Level: 1 Student Name:

Assessment Standard: AS91884 - Use Basic Iterative Processes To Develop A

Digital Outcome

Credits: 6

Further Comments Candidate Declaration:

I confirm that I have read and understood the conditions of this assessment,
and I have had the opportunity to get any clarification that I need from my
assessor.
Any health and safety requirements that I must observe have been outlined.
I confirm that all work completed for this assessment is my own and has been
produced without assistance from anyone else.
Finally, I confirm that the process by which I may seek a review of the marking
for this assessment has been outlined to me.

Teacher Signed: Student Signed: ___________________________

Date: Date: ___ / ___ / _____

Final Grading

Not Yet Achieved Achieved Merit Excellence

   

The learner used basic iterative processes to develop a digital outcome. This included doing the following.
Description
Planning the digital outcome to address a
problem, need, opportunity, or interest
Managing the development by decomposing the
digital outcome into smaller components
Trialling component parts of the outcome in an
iterative manner
Evidence/Judgements for Achievement
Applied
Evidence Marker Comment
Y/N
Example:
The learner has developed a plan for the
development of the digital outcome that includes
the following.
• Each component part of the outcome that ☐
needs to be developed
• The planned date for completion of each ☐
part.
• The resources that will be needed to ☐
develop each part of the outcome.
• The trialling and testing to be completed – ☐
including when and how this would be done
(eg a test plan for each main part of the
code).
• An overview of each part of the outcome in ☐
an appropriate form. For example: A
flowchart/ mindmap/ wireframe and/or
plain English to summarise the overall
digital outcome.
Example:
• The learner managed the development of ☐
the digital outcome by following the plan
they created, which included the smaller
component parts of the outcome.
Example:
• The learner trialled each part of the digital ☐
outcome before planning and building the
next part of the outcome.
• This included trialling relevant parts of the ☐
digital outcome with their peers and target
users to get feedback on the wording and
presentation.
Testing that the digital outcome functions as
intended
Describing implications relevant to the digital
outcome and its development
Example:
• The learner tested the different parts of the ☐
digital outcome to ensure they worked as
expected.
• The candidate also asked their peers to test ☐
the digital outcome to use a variety of
aspects that they may not have thought of
themselves.
This could include any of the following implications.
• Social
• Cultural
• Legal
• Ethical
• Intellectual property
• Privacy and/or confidentiality
• Accessibility
• Usability
• Functionality
• Aesthetics
• Sustainability and future-proofing
• End-user considerations
• Health and safety
It is expected that, at a minimum, usability,
functionality, aesthetics, end-user considerations,
and at least one other relevant implication will be
described in terms of the specific digital outcome
being developed.
 Evidence/Judgements for Achievement with Merit
The learner used basic iterative processes to develop an informed digital outcome. This included doing the following.
Applied
Description Evidence Marker Comment
Y/N
As for Achievement, PLUS:
Trialling multiple components and/or techniques Examples:
and selecting the most suitable • The learner researched different options for ☐
components for the digital outcome.
• The learner researched the different
components. They found two possible
components and tried out each to identify
which was most logical/efficient in the ☐
outcome as a whole.
Using the information from testing and trialling Example:
to improve the outcome • The learner used the results of their ☐
trialling, including feedback from peers and
target users to make improvements to the
wording and presentation of the digital
outcome. They provided screenshots
showing the ‘before’, and ‘after’ changes,
with annotations on the ‘before’
screenshots indicating what needed to be
changed, and annotations on the ‘after’
screenshots indicating what had been
changed.
• The candidate kept a testing log and noted
any errors that testing identified in the
digital outcome, along with an indication of
how this would be addressed. They also
included different versions of the digital
outcome.
Addressing implications relevant to the digital Example:
outcome • The candidate sought feedback from target ☐
end users and peers on the ‘look’ of the
digital outcome and used this feedback to
make changes where needed to ensure the
digital outcome is aesthetically pleasing and
appropriate for the end users.
 [The aforementioned is only possible examples.
Different and additional examples would be
expected].

Evidence/Judgements for Achievement with Excellence

The learner used basic iterative processes to develop a refined digital outcome. This included doing the following.
Description
As for Achievement and Merit, PLUS:
Apply information from the planning, testing,
and trialling to develop a high- quality outcome
Applied
Evidence Marker Comment
Y/N
Example:
The learner applied information gathered from their
planning, trialling, and testing of the digital
outcome to ensure the outcome:
• is free from errors and works effectively ☐
• makes efficient use of resources (avoids ☐
wasting time, money, and other resources)
• is one that target users find attractive and ☐
easy to use.
• There is clear evidence that the learner has ☐
carefully documented all information
gathered from planning, trialling, and
testing, and used this on an ongoing basis to
ensure all parts of the digital outcome
function correctly, and to improve the
outcome in terms of its aesthetics,
functionality, and usability.