Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 56

Engineers Training on

Seismic Retrofit design of Masonry Buildings


5-9 August 2019, Kathmandu, Nepal

BASICS OF SEISMIC VULNERABILITY


ASSESSMENT

Organized By:
National Reconstruction Authority – CLPIU
(Building)
Baliyo Ghar Program (NSET), supported by
USAID

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Objectives

At the end of the session, participants will be able to:

• Know the process of Seismic vulnerability assessment of


building

• Understand the Seismic Vulnerability factors

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Process for Assessment
Qualitative structural assessment

Site Visit & Collect Data

Determine region of seismicity, Geology & level of performance

Identify building type

Quick Checks & Quick


Identify the vulnerability factors
Calculations

Interpret probable performance of the building at IX MMI

Yes Meet the criteria No Buildings does


of target level of not Comply
performance

Quantitative
Building Complies Recommendation Demolition
Assessment
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Process for Assessment

Qualitative Assessment

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Steps for Qualitative
Assessment
1. Site visit & collect data

2. Determine region of seismicity and geology

3. Determine level of performance

4. Identify building type

5. Identify fragility of the building

6. Identify vulnerability factors

7. Identify probable influence by the different vulnerability factors to the level of


performance of building

8. Reinterpret the building fragility based on observed vulnerability factors

9. Interpret the probable performance of the building at different intensities

10. Recommendation
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
1. Site visit & data collection

Building description:
Architectural & structural drawings
Site visit
Interview (House owner, structural
engineer/designer, contractor..)

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 6


2. Region of seismicity and
Geology
Seismic Zone factor:
 Earthquake zone : Zone V (IS 1893(Part1):2002)

 Seismic Zone Factor = 1, NBC 105 for Kathmandu

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 7


2. Region of seismicity and
Geology
Earthquake shaking level:
 Location on Intensity map: IX Intensity

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 8


2. Region of seismicity and
Geology
Liquefaction potential:
 Location on liquefaction map map: Medium liquefaction

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 9


3. Level of performance

 Performance level: Immediate Occupancy


(School Building)
 Importance factor : 1.5

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 10


4. Building Typology
Identification

No. Building Types


1 Adobe, stone in mud, brick-in-mud (Low
Strength Masonry).
2 Brick in Cement, Stone in Cement
3 Non-engineered Reinforced Concrete
Moment-Resisting-Frame Buildings
4 Engineered Reinforced Concrete Moment-
Resisting-Frame Buildings
5 Others

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 11


5. Fragility of the Building

 Fragility of unreinforced masonry building at different


intensity of earthquake:

Shaking Intensity (MMI) VII VIII IX

Damage Grades for Weak DG3 DG4 DG5


Different Classes of Average DG2 DG3 DG4
Buildings Good DG1 DG2 DG3

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 12


6.Identify Vulnerability factors

Building System
Lateral Force Resisting System
Diaphragm
Non Structural Components
Geologic Site Hazards and Foundations

(Checklists have been developed based on FEMA 310,


Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of
Existing buildings- A Prestandard and IITK-GSDMA guideline
for Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of Existing
Buildings. )

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Factors associated with Building
System

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Configuration

It is related to dimensions, building form, geometric


proportion and location of structural components

U shaped building L shaped building

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Complex Shapes: Buildings
with re-entrant corners

U shaped building L shaped building

T shaped building Courtyard type building


Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Proportions

• Height to thickness ratio and Length to thickness ratio of


unreinforced masonry wall shall not be too large
• L/B < 3, H/B <3

h
L >3b

Long Narrow building b


Slender building
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Adjacency/pounding

– Clear horizontal distance between building under


consideration and any adjacent building shall be
•Greater than 4% of height of shorter building
Except for buildings that are of same height with floors located
at the same levels

34 Pounding in situation (b) is far more damaging


Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Pounding effect

Buildings attached to each other without seismic gap

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Geometry

•Shall avoid Complex Vertical Geometry


 Change in the horizontal dimension of lateral force
resisting system < 50% in a storey relative to adjacent
stories,
 Excluding penthouses and mezzanine floors, should be
made.

Vertical geometric irregularities


due to Set backs

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Mass

• Irregular distribution of mass in different stories of the


building
•Change in effective mass <100% from one storey to the
next. Light roofs, penthouse, and mezzanine floors need
not be considered.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Torsion

• Torsion is due to difference in center of stiffness and center


of mass
• Shall be less than 30% of building dimension at right
angles to direction of loading considered

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Redundancy

– Number of lines of vertical lateral load resisting


elements in each principal direction shall be greater
than or equal to 2

– Number of lines of shear walls in each direction shall


be greater than or equal to 2

Redundancy of Shear Wall


31
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Masonry Units and Joints
• In masonry buildings, deteriorated masonry units and
joints can result in significant reductions in strength of
structural elements

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Unreinforced masonry wall
cracks
•Diagonal wall cracks may reduce the strength and
stiffness of unreinforced masonry walls

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Factors associated with Lateral
Force Resisting System

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Shear Stress
in masonry shear walls

• If shear wall has a capacity in shear less than the


shear induced by earthquake load, shear failure may
occur and result in collapse.
• Shear Stress in Masonry shear walls:
τwall = Vj / Aw < 0.10 Mpa (or shear strength of wall)
Where,
Aw = total area of shear walls in the direction of the
loading
Vj = Maximum storey shear at storey level 'j‘

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Openings in walls

• Total length of openings in a wall <50% of the length of the


wall between consecutive cross walls in single storey
construction, 42 % in two storey construction, and 33 %
in three storey buildings.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Position of Opening

• Openings shall not be located at corners or junctions of a


wall
• Openings shall not be placed closer to an internal corner
of a wall than 1/4 the opening height or 600mm, whichever
is greater.
• The width of pier between two openings shall not be less
than half of the opening height or 600mm, whichever is
greater.
• The vertical distance between two openings one above
the other should not be less than 600mm or half the width
of the smaller opening, whichever is greater.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Openings in walls

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Seismic Resistant
Elements
• Plinth band, lintel band, sill band, gable band, roof
band, corner stitches
• Vertical reinforcement at corners and T junction and
around the openings

Corner Stitch

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Factors associated with
Diaphragms

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Diaphragm Continuity

• Split level floors and roofs, or diaphragms interruptions


create discontinuities in the diaphragm
• Reinforcing steel shall be present around the diaphragm
openings larger than 50% of the building width

Split level Large diaphragm opening


Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal
Lateral Restrainers

• For flexible floors


and roofs, each
joists and rafters
shall be restrained
by timber keys in
both sides of wall

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Wall Anchorage
& Connections

• Walls shall be properly


anchored to diaphragm for
out of plane forces.

• Diaphragm shall be well


connected to transfer loads
to shear walls.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Diagonal Bracing

• Flexible Diaphragms are to


be diagonally braced

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Additional factors for stone
buildings

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Through Stones

• For stone
buildings, walls
shall have plenty of
through stones
extending the
whole width of
walls.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Non-structural
component

Parapet walls, partition walls, mumty, water


tanks, projections and staircase are non
structural elements behave like cantilevers if
they remain unrestrained and are subjected to
greater amplification as compared to ground
motion becoming prone to failure.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Non-structural
component failure

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Unreinforced
Masonry Parapets

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Factors associated with site
hazards and foundations

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Area History

• The site shall not


have evidence of
landslide, mud flows,
soil settlement,
sinkholes, or fill soil.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Liquefaction

• Liquefaction
Susceptible
soil shall not
be present
underneath the
foundation.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Slope Failure

• Building shall be
sufficiently remote
from potential
earthquake induced
slope failures or rock
falls.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


7.Influence of Different
Vulnerability Factors to the Building:
Increasing Vulnerability of the Building by different vulnerability
factors
Vulnerability Factors
High Medium Low N/A Not known
Shape √
Proportion in Plan √
Number of Storey √
Opening in walls √
Position of Opening √
Load Path √
Redundancy √
Configurat
Geometry √
ion /
Mezzanines/Loft/Sub-floors √
Building
Weak Storey √
System
Soft Storey √
Vertical Discontinuities √
Mass √
Adjacent Buildings √
Deterioration of material √
Masonry joints √
Cracks in wall √
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 46
8. Reinterpret the building
fragility
The building to fall under “Average" category of the
“Brick in Cement Building” typology

MMI VII VIII IX

Building Performance DG2 DG3 DG4

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 47


9. Probable
performance of the building

Performance of the Building


Description
MMI =VII MMI =VIII MMI = IX
Structural Damage Slight Moderate Heavy

 The probable structural damage to the building in MMI IX


earthquake is heavy with serious failure of walls; partial
structural failure of roofs and floors.

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 48


10. Summary & Recommendation

The building is average type of unreinforced masonry in


Building typology
cement mortar building
Shear strength of walls, lack of vertical reinforcement,
High Vulnerability
horizontal bands and corner stitches, transfer to shear
Factors to the Building
walls
Medium Vulnerability Openings in walls, position of openings, height of walls,
Factors to the Building liquefaction, non structural components
Probable structural MMI VII MMI VIII MMI IX
performance Slight Moderate Heavy
 Summary:
It is identified that the building is likely to suffer heavy structural
damage at large earthquake of intensity IX MMI.
 Suggested action:
The building is suggested to conduct Quantitative Assessment.
Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 49
Recommendation

Meet the No
criteria of Buildings
Yes target level of does not
performance Complies

Building Quantitative Demolition


Complies Assessment

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Quantitative Assessment

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Destructive Test if needed

• Crushing test of concrete cubes


• Crushing test of brick masonry
• Tensile test of reinforcement

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Destructive Test if needed

In-situ Shear Test of masonry walls

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Retrofit Design

8/6/2019 Type your presentation theme - edit to put title on Insert/header & footer

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal 54


Objectives review

At the end of the session, participants will be able to:

• Know the process of Seismic vulnerability assessment of


building

• Understand the Seismic Vulnerability factors

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal


Thank You !!!

Earthquake Safe Communities in Nepal

You might also like