Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constitution Petition S.c-1
Constitution Petition S.c-1
(Original Jurisdiction)
Const. Petition No. /2023
VERSUS
INDEX
Malik Babar Hameed Advocate High Court, Member Islamabad Bar Association,
Islamabad
....Petitioner
VERSUS
.....Respondents
Respectfully Sheweth;
QUESTION OF LAW
a) Whether the Council of Common Interest (CCI) was justified to convene its
50th meeting on 05-08-2023?
b) Whether the care taker Chief Ministers of the Punjab and KPK Provinces
were constitutionally justified to participate in the meeting convened by
Council of Common Interest (CCI)?
c) Whether a meeting of CCI can be convened when the appellate forum is un-
available or is likely to be un-available?
e) Whether the matter of extension of a care taker setup must not be referred
to this Court in the unavoidable circumstances, if any?
g) Whether the care taker setup can be made of the persons with known
political party affiliation?
h) Whether a care taker Chief Minister accused of making partisan cabinet can
be allowed to change his cabinet and continue for indefinite period?
j) Whether the Parliament can take the power of the President granted by the
constitution through statutory amendment and not the constitutional
amendment?
l) Whether the census can be approved when the National Assembly is going
to be dissolved?
II. The above questions of law arose in the following facts and circumstances
of the case:-
FACTS
6. That while dilly dallying the holding of elections for the provincial
assemblies mentioned above various excuses were put forward including
security situation, lack of funds and elections of the provincial assemblies
as well as national assembly simultaneously. Even at one point of time 8th
October, 2023 was announced as the date of the General Elections.
7. That even the advice for dissolution of National Assembly four days before
the date of expiry of the term of National Assembly though a constitutional
step but seems to be tainted with malafide just to delay the elections as
farther as may be possible.
8. That almost in the last week of July it was publically announced that the
National Assembly shall be dissolved under the advice of the then Prime
Minister on 08-08-2023 yet the 50th meeting of the Council of Common
Interests (CCI) was convened on 05-08-2023 at Islamabad although it was
in the knowledge of all the respondents that in the provinces of Punjab and
KPK, caretaker setups are functioning that too beyond the constitutionally
mandated period of 90 days so, the representation of the masses of these
provinces in the meeting could not be termed as a regular or proper
representation as envisaged by the Constitution of Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, 1973.
9. That the 50th meeting of the CCI is also not mandated under the constitution
especially when the non-availability of the appellate forum of the CCI i.e.
Joint Sitting of the Senate as well as National Assembly is in the offing.
10. That the proceedings of the 50th meeting of the CCI are thus not warranted
under the constitution so are nullity in the eye of law.
11. That the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) without keeping in view
the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 issued delimitation
program while relying upon the outcome of the 50th meeting of the CCI and
thus violated the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 in as
much it warrants the elections within the period of 90 days from dissolution
of the National Assembly. More so when the seats of the National
Assembly as well as provincial assemblies could not be altered in the
absence of National Assembly of Pakistan.
12. That the above mentioned acts of the respondents are leading the country
towards the constitutional crises amassed with political as well as economic
crises which can cause irreparable loss to the country, nation and
individuals like the petitioner.
13. That the petitioner feels his onerous duty to knock the door of this Court as
an attempt to rectify the current situation of the Country where currency is
depreciating day by day and the masses have failed to make both ends meet.
14. That the petitioner requests this Court to look into the above mentioned
circumstances and to answer the above mentioned constitutional/legal
questions in order to save the country as well as the nation from any further
complications.
PRAYER
v) That the caretaker setups of the provinces of Punjab and KPK are
working without any mandate of the Constitution of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973 hence all actions carried out by them
beyond 90 days of their taking charge of dissolution of the
respective provincial assemblies are declared to be without
lawful authority.
Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the
circumstances, may also graciously be allowed to the petitioner.
CERTIFICATE:
It is certified that, this is first Constitution petition which is being filed on the
subject matter by the petitioner.
Advocate-on-Record
Dated: 24- 08-2023
“POWER-OF-ATTORNEY”
To
Advocate-On-Record
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
(Appellate/Original Jurisdiction)
Accepted
Signature
Advocate-on-Record
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Islamabad.
M/s. M. Shahid Kamal Khan, ASC 0321-5251900,
Ghulam Mehboob Khokhar ASC, 0333-5101165 &
Ch. Amjad Ali ASC 0300-7183755 shall appear on behalf of
Petitioner.
Advocate on Record
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
(Original Jurisdiction)
Malik Babar Hameed Advocate High Court, Member Islamabad Bar Association,
Islamabad
....Petitioner
VERSUS
.....Respondents
To,
NOTICE
Take Notice that today I have filed a Constitution Petition under Article
184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 before the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Malik Babar Hameed Advocate High Court, Member Islamabad Bar Association,
Islamabad
....Petitioner
VERSUS
.....Respondents
Respectfully Sheweth,
1. That the captioned Constitution Petition is being filed by the petitioner before
this Hon’ble Court, contents of which may kindly be read as an integral part of
the instant application.
3. That the caretaker setups of the provinces of Punjab and KPK are carrying on
official business without any mandate of Constitution or the law.
4. That each and every day of the above mentioned caretaker setups is continuity
of illegal, unconstitutional regime which cannot be permitted under any stretch
of law or the imagination hence the same needs to be stopped forthwith.
5. That if the relief prayed for is not granted to the applicant, they will suffer
irreparable loss.
PRAYER
In view of the above matter, it is most respectfully prayed that the above cited
CMA may kindly be accepted and the caretaker setups of Punjab and KPK may kindly
Malik Babar Hameed Advocate High Court, Member Islamabad Bar Association,
Islamabad
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS
CMA are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information.
2. That the said facts have been obtained from the perusal of the record as
Deponent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
(Original Jurisdiction)
Malik Babar Hameed Advocate High Court, Member Islamabad Bar Association,
Islamabad
VERSUS
.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
That I did serve the above named respondents of my having filed Constitution
Islamabad.
Deponent