Brief synopsis

The method of death (homicide or suicide) was determined at the crime site of the death itself using
the physical evidence that was at hand in the present case study report, which is a unique and
unusual case of suspicious death. A woman fled the house after receiving a call on her cell phone,
according to IO. She didn't arrive home until late in the day, so her husband and kids searched but
were unable to find her. A missing person report was then filed at the neighbourhood police station.
The lifeless body of the missing woman and another man were discovered in a hotel restroom late
the same day. The IO contacted us over the scientific add. The case was resolved at the scene of
occurrence (SO) after we went and provided the IO with guidance based on our findings.

A crime scene is a gold mine of data. To identify the fact at the crime site so that it can be
acknowledged by the court's sentencing authorities, forensic experts should use their knowledge and
expertise9. The current case report contained important details regarding a suspected death. Our
team's observations on the scene are as follows:

1. There was no other key, gate, or window for guests to use to enter or exit the hotel room,
which was locked from the inside. The Sharma room was reserved in the afternoon,
according to the hotel reception, but no orders for food or tea came from this room.
2. The door was forced open, and as the visitor entered, the floor was covered in blood
splatters and some incomplete barefoot prints. Near the double bed, on the tea table, were a
tool box and leather bag with tools. There were several blood clots seen on the bag as well.
The preliminary test was performed on each blood spot.
3. Upon entering the hotel room's bathroom, both bodies were found there. One fired
cartridge was discovered in the bathroom's washbasin.

Who killed someone or whether it was a murder mystery was uncertain on the IO. In accordance
with our four observations, the hotel room's door was closed from the inside; there was a bloodstain
on the person's tool bag; there was one cartridge case in the gun and one in the sink; and there was
naked skin in the room. Male footprints left by Sharma on the ground. On the basis of these findings,
the conundrum was resolved and the report's details were explained. The male had a sexual
encounter with the woman first, shot her in the bathroom with a CMP, and then returned to the
room looking for a second bullet in his backpack to use in his intended suicide. At the washbasin, the
shooter changed the bullet and fired on his own. The cases were settled on the spot, and all of the
material was sent to a lab for additional, crucial tests that are not covered in this piece.

Evidence has been shown to tell a story and assist an investigator in reconstructing the crime scene.
In establishing the sequence of events at spot 10, particularly those involving weapons, GSR is the
primary piece of evidence. Physical evidences (such as blood stains, GSR, and struggle marks) that
are appropriately analysed and interpreted will aid the investigating agency in choosing the best
course of action. These tangible proofs are more trustworthy than testimonies 11. We provided the
IO with the right investigational direction based on our on-site observations, blood prelim tests, GSR
pretests, and sequence of events (reconstruction), and cases were decided based on physical
evidence12.
Evidence collected

 Hotel room forcefully open.

 Tea table nearby blood detected
 Black coloured tool bag having blood drop on it.
 Bare feet blood smeared impressions observed at the floor of the room.
 Both the dead body lying in the bathroom
 Hand made firearms having a fired bullet in it.