GEOPOLITICAL, SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FIELD WORK ON COVID 19

(CORONAVIRUS).

Instrumental English 3rd semester students:

Alexandre Luiz Zarth Schreiner

Helmut Henrique Zarth Schreiner

Julian Saulo Adami

Lilia Silva Martins

Miriam Vaz Silva

Renilton Nunes Junior

Silvio Roberto Lopes Junior

Roberta Azevedo Dias

Victor Farias Asuncion

Professor Dr. Sergio Roberto Moraes Grunbaum 3 ° C Headquarters 2 UCP

November 2020.

1
 Index:

Introduction. Page.3

Methodology. Page.4

Summary. Page.5

Political sphere. Page.5

Social ambit. Page.8

Comprehensive health information. Page.10

Psychological scope. Page.14

Conclusion. Page.19

Thanks. Page.22

Bibliographic references. Page.23

2
Introduction.

Let's start from this to help the collaboration of the data collected online to
help in the discussion about political, economic, social and health problems
collected by our system.

We use online platforms mainly due to the corona virus pandemic (covid 19)
so as not to spread the disease or end up contracting it and thus help in
prevention.

The data collected is from a simplified interview and does not necessarily
link any document or specification of the interviewee, thus obtaining wide-ranging
responses that are defined in the following text.

3
Applied methodology

Used in the pandemic, being the main reason for heat and contamination to
the covid, it is still present at the current time of the interviews. We use the Google
Forms Tool (Google Forms) to ask the questions.

In its dissemination we use the research method together with the tools
wattsapp, instagran and telegran (which show a satisfactory result for collection
and dissemination).

The questions were mandatory, but open data collections and can identify
100% of the responses received, but the surveys remained individual. Since there
was no mandatory data collection for informants. Thus she transmitted, but
transparency to the interviewee, not being the same forcing her to insert her name
in whole or in part.

The data collection period began on 10/27/2020 around 6:00 p.m. Brasilia
time and continued until 11/09/2020 around 12:15 a.m. Brasilia time, containing
the same hour several 237 respondents.

4
Political scope:

The research in the online method was successful with 29 surveys, in the 25
Brazilian states, covering all regions from north to south with an international focus
as well.

In the northern region, the states (Acre, Amapá, Amazonia, Pará, Rondônia
and Tocantins) represented the number of 22 in the survey with a percentage of
9.28%.

In the northeast region, the states (Alagoas, Bahía, Ceará, Maranhão,

Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte and Sergipe) concentrated the
number of 53 in the survey, with a percentage of 22.36%.

In the central-west region, the states (Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do
Sul and the Federal District) represented the number of 48 in the survey, with a
percentage of 20.25%.

In the southeast region, the states (Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de
Janeiro and São Paulo) concentrated the number of 53 in the survey, with a
percentage of 22.36%.

In the southern region, the states of (Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio
Grande do Sul) concentrated the number of 52 in the survey, with a percentage of
21.94%.

And we also got responses from some Brazilians who were outside the
country who counted number 9 in the survey, with a percentage of 3.8%.

5
6
This survey also obtained a wide age range of the respondents, who are between
0 and 83 years old, with the number of 46 in the range from 0 to 20, the number of
68 in the 21 to 30 and number of 10 above 51 years.

Thus, the sex found was 63.3% for women and 36.7% for men.

That regardless of his religion, he was neither questioned nor asked in the
survey.

Attached to the survey was the question about their level of education,
which we obtained the following results:

Incomplete basic level 0.42%, complete basic 0.84%, incomplete primary

2.11%, complete primary 4.64%, incomplete average 2.95% complete average
18.57%, technical or technological course 2.53% Incomplete higher education

7
24.47%, complete higher education 23.21% and graduate higher education
20.25%.

Social ambit:

Among those interviewed, we also investigated their situation in the market,

so we add among them that 48.5% are in the labour market, 40.1% are students,
11.4% are not fully working in the labour market, like retirees, unemployed,
working. At home, leave (pregnancy or others) and heads of family.

8
 Another important issue described was the financial aspect during the
pandemic on a scale of one that had no impact to five that obtained debt. We
come to the following conclusion.

One (1) without financial impact 35%

Two (2) slight financial impact 18.6%

Three (3) moderate financial impact 23.2%

Four (4) major financial impacts 10.1%

Five (5) high indebtedness 13.1%

9
 Comprehensive health information.

In this survey we request the collaboration of the interviewees to inform the

following options.

Was it contaminated with covid 19 (corona virus)?

12.7% answered yes, 66.2% answered no, now we also insert the question
in which 21.1% answered maybe.

10
 Another was whether the respondent performed any screening tests.

Since they answered that 62.9% did not take the test, and 37.1% answered
that the test had already been done. Within this, there was no specificity that
generated whether it was positive or negative to what they took the test.

11
 In the presence of the survey, we also asked if the interviewees had any
symptoms of corona virus (covid 19), among them, we had the following answers:
36.3% yes and no symptoms 63.7%.

Now we enter into a question of our own that we seek by asking the
following question. Were you in direct contact with potential transmitters?

Our answers were equivalent to yes 54.9%, no 25.3% and perhaps 19.8%.

12
 Among the questions we evaluate that we could insert one that is being
discussed a lot at the international level.

For the interviewees we ask for your collaboration in the following question.
About the covid vaccine today?

I would use 19.1% without fear, I would use it as a test 4.3%, I would not
use it, because I do not believe in the vaccine 3.9%, I do not think it will have
results today 8.7%, I would use it after the release of competent bodies to validate
them 58.7% and it is only a political strategy of 5.2%.

13
Psychological scope.

In our research, we also looked for the psychological factor in which

respondents answered the following questions.

Did you suffer any emotional impact in this pandemic? And using a scale,
we start with zero (0) indicating nothing and five (5) indicating depression. Being
the results we find.

None (indicator zero) 16.9%, not visible (indicator one) 10.5%, small
(indicator two) 16.9%, medium (indicator three) 24.1%, depressive onset (indicator
four) 17.7 % and depression (indicator five) 13.9%.

Another topic addressed was the risk of contamination, what would be your
fear? In response to the matter, we asked the following questions. Little fear
21.9%, moderate fear 27%, great fear 8.9%, low anxiety 4.2%, moderate anxiety
20.7% and a lot of anxiety 17.3%.

14
 In three more questions that covered the pandemic in total, we made the
following conclusion what was your psychological state before the pandemic, in the
first three months and how you were answering the questionnaire. This was
released in a scalar fashion, with zero (0) indicating a depressed state and ten (10)
indicating a super happy state.

15
 Using the parameters we equate the responses indicating where zero (0) to
three (3) with some psychological problem, four (4) to seven (7) in a normality

16
indicating which would be common among the interviewees and eight (8) to ten (10
) a normality that would not indicate any psychosomatic change or problem.

Among the responses to the pandemic, the percentage sums of responses

from zero to three (0-3) indicated with some psychological problem reached 13%,
in the responses from four to seven (4-7), indicated as common problems, we
obtained the sum of 33.3% and in the answers from eight to ten (8-10), indicated
as without psychosocial problem, we obtained a sum of 53.7%.

Among the responses in the first three months of the pandemic, the
percentage sums of responses from zero to three (0-3) indicated with some
psychological problem reached 37.2%, in responses from four to seven (4-7),
listed as common problems. We obtained the sum of 46.3% and in the responses
from eight to ten (8-10), indicated as without psychosocial problem, we obtained a
sum of 16.5%.

17
 Among the responses in their current position, the percentages of
responses from zero to three (0-3) indicated with some psychological problem
reached 13%, in the responses from four to seven (4-7), indicated as common
problems, we obtained the sum of 52,8% and in the answers from eight to ten
(8-10), indicated as without psychosocial problem, we obtained a sum of 34,2%.

18
Conclusion.

We first concluded that it was used in an academic part and members used
their contacts, groups or friends to formulate it. In this conclusion the index of
workers, unemployed students and other functions, we cannot take in total bad
considerations leads to be discussed.

In terms of education, we can already conclude that we obtained all degrees

of employee education.

Since our research covered almost the entire national territory and even
respondents who reside abroad.

The audience present was presented with an amount of 63.3% for women
and 36.7% for men.

We enter into discussion the following; assessing the level of education in a

current national average, we have 10.97% who is not finished in high school. As
for the interviewees, we conclude that 45.57% are in higher education or have
already completed a technical course. The remaining 43.46% are high-grade and /
or attended the same.

In relation to the sex factor and the levels of training, the greater number of
(sex) is higher than the level of education than the opposite sex.

Regarding foreign geography, it cannot be concluded that the data is a

percentage of 96.2%, but at the national level, the northeast and southeast region
that obtained the highest number of responses, increasing the percentage of
22.36%, each region with the sum of 44.72% followed by the southern region with
21.94%, in sequence the Central West region with 20.25%, leaving only the
northern region with 9.28% and also outside of Brazil with 3, 8%.

The data collected came to the conclusion that 66.2% were not
contaminated by covid 12.7% confirm that they have already contracted the
disease, but the doubt remains with 21.1% regarding its confirmation or not.

19
 Thus, we had a percentage of 63.7% who did not show symptoms and the
remaining 36.3% confirmed that they had a symptom. In relation to the tests
applied, how many see that there is a good relationship with those who presented
the symptom, since the number of interviewees evaluated was 37.1% versus
62.9% who did not take the test and the same data concluded that perhaps were
they contaminated? A smaller percentage than those who took the test. Thus
leaving a conclusion in which the path followed up to the present moment is
satisfactory.

We also came to the conclusion that not only policies are (not) helping, but
also the economy (not helping), since the responses acquired about the financial
impact of the interviewees resulted in 53.6% (not) was impacted on your opinion.
That they were low or none.

Now, in terms of the psychological level that we should inform you of, before
the pandemic started, we had 53.7% of people who were psychologically well
against 13% who were in other circumstances. When viewing and analyzing the
data obtained, he sees that the current situation is close, but somewhat diffuse
among most of the interviewees, going from total happiness to the beginning of
improvement, with 34.2% being in better conditions before.

Already at the beginning of the pandemic, which we comment on in another

question, we see that the media did not help the conditions, providing a lot of
information under which it became frustrating for those who received more
cumulative knowledge. Since 24.6% left their comfort zone and almost completely
reduced their satisfaction, approaching a certain depression.

In a broad sense, we also commented on the vaccine, which was the most
talked about topic in the current media. And most of them are aware that the
commands used for the launch still have the most important role so that the
interviewees must or can use it efficiently, with 58.7% only believing in the vaccine
after the launch of ANVISA followed. Of the percentage of 19.1%. Which would
use any type of vaccine without any fear, and also captured which add up to the

20
percentage of 4.3% that they would use to test it, thus helping the organs that are
in search of the vaccine? The rest, being 8.7%, do not believe that a result will
arrive 5.2% think that the promise is only to choose a candidate (political strategy)
and 3.9% do not believe in the vaccine (assuming that they may or may not accept
its use in Brazil, as legally it is not required).

21
Thanks.

For our research, we thank Google for providing search tools such as online
forms and their tools. We also appreciate the means of publishing the research,
whether mobile phone operating systems such as Android (Google and Linux),
IOS (Apple) and others have been used. As a whole, we also appreciate the
applications provided to mobile phones free of charge and also paid as wattzapp
telegran isntagran and others that helped to receive the data.

Now my most sincere and greatest thanks are the people who knew how to
answer the form sincerely because without them whose names we will not mention
but who go from A to Z in the north to south regions of Brazil and also to those
outside the country.

We appreciate the technological means found today so that this instrument

can be used as computers on the Internet and the Linux and Microsoft operating
systems that were used to operate the machine.

I am especially grateful to Microsoft for the text formatting tools and the
spreadsheet developer. And also AbleWord for providing a suitable program to
convert files to PDF for free.

My most sincere and greatest whom I must not fail to thank is the Central
University of Paraguay that offered the course I am taking today, and also my
class that accompanied me and we are always helping each other to stand out and
improve as colleagues and future professionals.

To the teachers who introduced us to the research subjects under which we

learned a lot about how to do quality work, and in the space the instrumental
English material that helped us along the way, encouraging and helping in the
steps of how to formulate an exemplary work.

22
Bibliography:

Use of collection tools, https://docs.google.com/forms .

Use of the data collection tool, https://drive.google.com/ .

Text editing, Microsoft Word (ver. 2007), AbleWord (ver. 3.0 PDF)

Text translation, https://translate.google.com.br/ .

Editing charts and spreadsheets, Microsoft Excel (ver. 2007) and Google,
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets .

23