Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Huang Et Al Canadian99
Huang Et Al Canadian99
net/publication/245377430
CITATIONS READS
14 80
3 authors, including:
An-Bin Huang
National Chiao Tung University
77 PUBLICATIONS 1,062 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by An-Bin Huang on 22 March 2021.
Abstract: Publications associated with sands are often limited to clean (i.e., little fines content), uniform, uncemented
silica or quartz sand. On the other hand, the importance of mineral content, particle shapes, as well as gradation to the
behavior of sand has long been recognized. Although systematic studies of sands other than clean quartz sand have
been limited, there is increasing attention being paid to sands with an appreciable fines content. Because of a major
construction project, extensive field and laboratory experiments were performed on a silty fine sand from Mai-Liao,
which is located on the central west coast of Taiwan. Results show that Mai-Liao Sand (MLS), a silty sand, can be
significantly more compressible than clean quartz sand under static load. The particles of MLS have moderate strength,
and significant crushing can be induced by triaxial shearing. As a result, MLS has low dilatancy and a relatively small
range of peak friction angles. Cone penetration tests in MLS were conducted in a calibration chamber. Analyses of the
data indicate that interpreting cone tip resistance in MLS using methods developed based on clean quartz sand without
considering the differences of compressibility can be unrealistic. This paper documents results of the experimental
studies on MLS.
Key words: silty fine sand, strength, dilatancy, compressibility, crushing, in situ test.
Résumé : Les publications associées aux sables se limitent souvent aux sables quartziques ou siliceux propres (peu de
fines), uniformes et non cimentés. Par ailleurs on a reconnu depuis longtemps que le comportement de ces matériaux
était fortement tributaire de la partie minérale, de la forme des particules ainsi que de la répartition granulométrique.
Bien qu’il n’existe qu’un petit nombre d’études systématiques sur les sables autres que les sables quartziques propres,
ceux qui contiennent un part appréciable de fines retiennent de plus en plus l’attention. A l’occasion d’un important
projet de construction, on a effectué des essais complets, en place et au laboratoire, sur un sable fin silteux de Mai-
Liao, sur la côte centre-ouest de Taiwan. Les résultats indiquent que le sable de Mai-Liao (MLS) peut être beaucoup
plus compressible, sous charge statique, qu’un sable quartzique propre. Les particules de MLS ont une résistance
modérée et un cisaillement triaxial peut provoquer un broyage significatif des grains. Ainsi le MLS présente-t-il une
dilatance faible et un intervalle relativement étroit d’angles de frottement au pic. Des essais de pénétration au cône ont
été effectués sur le MLS dans une chambre de calibration. L’analyse des données indique qu’il peut être irréaliste
d’interpréter la résistance de pointe selon des méthodes développées pour des sables propres, sans considérer les
différences de compressibilité. Cet article présente les résultats des essais expérimentaux sur le MLS.
Mots clés : sable fin silteux, résistance, dilatance, compressibilité, broyage, essai in situ.
Fig. 1. General layout of the Mai-Liao project site and soil N from SPT, cone tip resistance, qc, from CPT, and fines
boring locations. (particles pass No. 200 sieve) content profiles from 13 of the
N borings shown in Fig. 1. The shear wave velocities shown in
Fig. 2 were collected from seven test locations. The fines of
MLS are mostly nonplastic; the in situ fines contents varied
Taiwan from less than 10 to over 90%. The soil deposit is generally
Strait A Mai-Liao
classified as SM or ML, depending on the amount of fines
B
content. The ML material is mostly found below a depth of
10 m.
C
D
10
Depth, m
20
30
40
Compressibility of MLS test in the triaxial cell. A burette was connected to the drain-
age lines of the triaxial specimen. The water level in the bu-
Compressibility of sand under static conditions is usually rette was monitored by a differential pressure transducer.
low, at least for quartz sand, except when the stress is ex- The amount of porewater drainage in and out of the speci-
tremely high. Under high-stress conditions, the compression men during the isotropic consolidation was monitored by
of sand is mainly a result of particle crushing. Extensive measuring the porewater level fluctuation in the burette. Fig-
studies on compression and crushing of granular materials ure 7 shows a set of isotropic consolidation curves in terms
under elevated stresses have been reported (Lee and of void ratio versus effective mean normal stress (e – log p′).
Farhoomand 1967; Vesic and Clough 1968; El-Sohby and The maximum void ratio (emax = 1.04) and the minimum
Andrawes 1972; Hardin 1985; Been et al. 1991; Lade et al. void ratio (emin = 0.57) of MLS are indicated in Fig. 7 to
1996; Yamamuro et al. 1996; Konrad 1998). The compress- provide a reference of relative density, Dr, for the consolida-
ibility of MLS was measured isotropically in a triaxial cell tion curves. The step-loading consolidation tests had a maxi-
and one-dimensionally in an oedometer using the kiln-dried mum consolidation stress of 588 kPa.
material. The primary compression index taken as the slope of the e –
The isotropic consolidation tests were performed on spec- log p′ curve near the maximum consolidation stress is ap-
imens, 70 mm in diameter and 150 mm high, prepared in proximately 0.08 ± 0.01. The swelling index or slope of the
membrane-lined split mould mounted on the lower platen of rebound part of the e – log p′ curve is 0.013 ± 0.002. These
the triaxial cell. Dry sand was first placed in the mould us- compression indices are unusually high for a sand under
ing a spoon and then statically pressed to achieve the desired such mild stress conditions. The consolidation stress was
void ratio in four equal layers. Because of the high com- maintained for 60 min for each load increment to facilitate
pressibility of MLS, to be described later, static pressing was observations of secondary consolidation. The time settle-
rather effective in densifying the sand specimen without ment record provided a set of void ratio – time (e – log t)
causing particle segregation. To verify the uniformity of gra- curves to determine the secondary compression index. The
dation, a specimen was prepared following this procedure ratios of primary over the secondary compression indices
and then saturated in the triaxial cell under an effective con- (equivalent to C α /Cc in one-dimensional compression) taken
fining stress of 30 kPa. The confining stress was then re- beyond the apparent preconsolidation stress varied from 0.02
leased and the specimen removed from the triaxial cell. The to 0.025, which is within the range of sand and sandy silt in
specimen was sliced into nine equal layers. Table 1 shows one-dimensional compression, as reported by Mesri et al.
the fines content measured for each of the nine layers. They (1990). The whole specimen was used for a sieve analysis
varied from 14.6 to 16.2% with an average of 15.3%, which after the consolidation test. The change in fines contents was
is 0.2% higher than the average of those shown in Fig. 3. No within 1% compared with the average fines content of
sign of concentration of fines was noticed. 15.1% shown in Fig. 3. The difference is likely to be within
The specimen was saturated under a back-pressure of the accuracy of the experiments, indicating that the volume
98.1 kPa prior to the doubly drained isotropic consolidation change was mainly a result of rearrangement of sand parti-
Fig. 3. Grain size distribution of MLS. Fig. 4. Scanning electronic micrographs of MLS. (a) Particles
retained on a No. 200 sieve; (b) particles passing a No. 200 sieve.
100 100
Field (0–10m)
90 90
Kiln-dried
80 80
70 70
Fines by weight, %
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001
Sieve opening, mm
100 100
Field (10–40m)
90 90
Kiln-dried
80 80
70 70
Fines by weight, %
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20 the case of a step-loading consolidation test. The vertical
10 10 deformation of the specimen was monitored using a linear
displacement transducer and the vertical stress measured
0 0 with a load cell. A strain rate of 0.065%/min was used in
10.000 1.000 0.100 0.010 0.001 these tests. This strain rate is approximately 10 times that of
Sieve opening, mm the isotropic step-loading consolidation tests described
above. Figure 8 shows e versus vertical consolidation stress,
σv′, from the one-dimensional consolidation tests with three
different initial void ratios. The specimens were consoli-
cles and crushing was minimal. dated to a maximum consolidation stress of 10 MPa. A com-
In order to facilitate further comparisons with quartz sand parison with quartz sand (see Fig. 8) under similar loading
in compressibility and crushing, one-dimensional consolida- conditions shows that MLS is at least five times as com-
tion tests under elevated stress conditions were conducted on pressible as quartz sand, depending on the stress level and
MLS. A high-capacity, strain-controlled load frame origi- density. Results show a further increase of compressibility
nally designed for creep tests on rock specimens was used beyond the maximum stress level applied in the isotropic
for the consolidation tests. The sand specimen was prepared consolidation (i.e., 588 kPa). The one-dimensional compres-
in a thick, oil-impregnated bronze ring 70 mm in diameter sion index according to the e – log σv′ curves at σv′ values
and 25 mm high. The specimen was inundated in water as in between 3 and 10 MPa, where three curves essentially
Fig. 5. Variation of qc/PaN with fines content. Fig. 7. e – log p ′ curves from isotropic consolidation tests.
10 1.05 emax
4 25 29 38 48
9 1.00 Initial Dr , %
5 26 32 40 Borehole No.
50
8 10 27 36 42 0.95
60
7 Kulhawy and Mayne (1991) 0.90
70
6 0.85 85
qc / PaN
5 0.80
e
4 0.75
3 0.70
2 0.65
1 0.60
emin
0 0.55
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 10 100 1000
Fines content, % log p', kPa
Fig. 6. Correlation between Gmax and qc of MLS. Fig. 8. e – log σv ′ curves from one-dimensional consolidation
60 tests.
4 25 29 38 48 1.0
MLS
5 26 32 40 Initial Dr = 24 %
50
10 27 36 42 Initial Dr = 38 %
0.9
Borehole No. Initial Dr = 62 %
40 Quartz sand
Rix and Stokoe ( 1991 ) Loose
Gmax / qc
0.8
Medium
30
Yamamuro et al. ( 1996 )
e
0.7
20
10 0.6
0 0.5
100 1000 2000
qc / (σ'v) 1/2
10 100 1000 10000 100000
Table 1. Vertical distributions of fines content of the triaxial log σ'v, kPa
specimen.
Layer No. Height (mm) Fines content (%) merge together, is approximately 0.29. This compression in-
1 0–17 15.3 dex value is comparable with that of a lean clay. The whole
2 17–34 15.7
specimen was used in the measurement of fines content fol-
3 34–51 16.2
lowing the consolidation test. All three specimens showed
4 51–68 15.4
an increase of fines content of approximately 3% after the
5 68–86 14.6
test. Judging from the moderate increase of fines content, it
6 86–103 14.7
appears that the compression of MLS under one-dimensional
loading is again mostly a result of rearrangement of soil par-
7 103–120 15.3
ticles.
8 120–137 15.4
Hardin (1985) indicated that most crushing occurs to par-
9 137–154 15.4
ticles with diameters larger than silt size (D ≥ 0.074 mm).
© 1999 NRC Canada
Huang et al. 93
Table 2. Variables applied in the MLS triaxial tests. Fig. 9. CID triaxial test results with an initial Dr of 50%.
′ – φcrit
Fig. 10. φmax ′ versus p ′p for MLS. Fig. 11. Dilatancy of MLS during triaxial tests.
12 1.0
p'p , kPa Quartz sand
Initial Dr, %
p'p = 300 kPa
10 250 ( Q = 10 )
Dr = 85 % 50 0.8
( Q=9) 300
60
400
8 70
φ'max - φ'crit , deg.
( dε v / dεa ) max
0.6 500
85
Dr = 50 %
6 (Q = 9 )
0.4 MLS
p'p = 300 kPa
4 ( Q=7)
0.2
2
0 0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
10 100 1000 10000 Dr, %
p'p , kPa
Fig. 12. Critical state lines and CPT initial states. Fig. 13. Schematic view of the calibration chamber.
cone
1.0 cone
CPT initial state
container
Critical State Line drainage
port
MLS
0.9
Ticino (Konrad 1998)
membrane
0.7
specimen
piezometer
cell
0.6 wall
1500 mm
0.5
10 100 1000 10000 bottom plate
log p', kPa
back-pressure and the desired confining stress were then ap- Mai-Liao. The upper K values shown in Table 3 were se-
plied. The status of saturation was monitored through the six lected to reflect a moderately to highly overconsolidated
piezometers installed in the specimen. In the six saturated stress history due to dynamic compaction.
chamber specimens shown in Table 3, the average B param-
eter from the piezometer readings after 2 h of saturation CPT chamber test results
ranged from 0.95 to 0.98. Considering the compressibility of There were a total of 40 chamber CPT performed in this
MLS, these B values should correspond to a degree of satu- series of experiments, as shown in Table 3. Six of them were
ration in excess of 99.8% according to Black and Lee performed in a saturated specimen using a standard
(1973). (35.6 mm diameter) piezocone to evaluate the development
Variables applied in the calibration tests include initial Dr of excess pore pressure during cone penetration. The porous
of the specimen, effective vertical stress σv′, and the ratio of element was located immediately behind the cone tip. The
effective horizontal stress σh ′/σv′ (K). Table 3 summarizes remaining CPT were conducted in a dry specimen using a
these applied variables. All tests used stress-controlled verti- half-size (17.8 mm diameter) cone. Figure 14 depicts the qc,
cal and horizontal boundary conditions. Dynamic compac- friction ratio FR, and excess pore pressure ∆u obtained from
tion was an important part of the construction activities in Test 4. The corresponding piezometer readings obtained dur-
© 1999 NRC Canada
Huang et al. 97
100
Depth of penetration, mm
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fig. 15. Excess pore pressure measurements from piezometers in men, as shown in Fig. 15. In Test 4, the cone penetration
Test 4. was interrupted at 300 mm and the excess pore pressure was
Initial Dr = 70 % allowed to dissipate before further penetration. The full dis-
σ'v = 147.1 kPa , σ'h = 147.1 kPa , Back-pressure = 294.2 kPa sipation of excess pore pressure took approximately 25 s.
∆u, kPa According to McNeilan and Bugno (1984), the qc values im-
-20 0 20 40 60 80 mediately after restart of the penetration can be at least 20%
0 higher than that just prior to the interruption for CPT in silt
or sandy silt. The discrepancy in qc is a result of high pore
dL, mm pressure development during cone penetration in silt. For the
100
test shown in Fig. 14, the peak qc after restart was
25.4
11.55 MPa, which is 4% higher than the qc recorded just
200 25.4 prior to the interruption of penetration, and much lower than
Depth of penetration, mm
Fig. 16. Comparison of qc profiles from tests with two different Fig. 17. qc versus σ h ′.
cone diameters. 40
qc, MPa Initial Dr, %
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 35
0 50
70
30
100 85
25
Depth of penetration, mm
qc, MPa
200 20
15
300
10
400 Initial Dr = 70%
σ'v = σ'h = 294.3 kPa 5
Cone diameter, mm
500 35.6 0
17.8 0 200 400 600 800 1000
σ'h, kPa
600
Fig. 18. qc versus σv ′.
Figure 17 shows the averaged qc values and their relation- 40
ship with initial σh ′ in the specimen. The average qc is deter-
Initial Dr, %
mined based on readings taken in calibration tests at depths 35
from 200 to 500 mm where qc has reached more or less a 50
steady value. The qc in MLS has a clear and positive rela-
tionship with σh ′. The influence of σh ′ appears to be much 30 70
stronger than the initial Dr. The relationship between qc and
85
σv′ is not nearly as obvious as shown in Fig. 18. For low- 25
compressibility sand, there have been conflicting reports on
qc, MPa
Fig. 19. Normalized qc versus ψ N. Fig. 20. Comparison between measured qc and qc computed
1000 using eq. [5].
40
MLS
(qc - p0 )/ p'0 at p'0 = 100 kPa
30
Sand type
MLS 10
Ticino (Baldi et al. 1986; Konrad 1998)
10
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5
Normalized state parameter, ΨN 0
0 10 20 30 40
ous soil types. Using Ticino sand and a p′0 of 100 kPa as a Computed qc, MPa
reference, it is possible to obtain a unique normalized qc for
several types of sand, as reported by Konrad (1998). This during penetration should have similar dilative or
framework offers an ideal platform where qc in MLS can be contractive behavior. Or, the state paths should follow the
compared with a clean, uniformly graded sand, such as same direction to reach critical state where grain crushing
Ticino sand, considering the differences in dilatancy, grada- occurs under high-stress conditions. This assumption would
tion, and grain crushing characteristics. be valid for most of the clean, uniformly graded quartz sand
Figure 19 compiles MLS chamber CPT data along with with comparable compressibility. As reported in Fig. 8, the
Ticino sand reported by Baldi et al. (1986) and Konrad compressibility of MLS can be many times higher, espe-
(1998). The qc value is normalized following an empirical cially under high stresses. It is thus expected that MLS near
equation by Konrad (1998) for a reference p′0 of 100 kPa as a penetrating cone tip is much more contractive than Ticino
sand under the same p′0 and ψN. For Konrad’s (1998) frame-
q − p q c − p0 p′0
0.373
[4] c 0 =
work to be valid, it is necessary to account for such differ-
p′0
p′0 =100kPa p′0 100 ences in sand compressibility. For MLS, it may require the
choice of p′cs that corresponds to a lower ψN than that in
Ticino sand. The current framework, however, does not pro-
where p0 is the total mean stress at initial state. For the vide a basis for an appropriate selection of that ψN.
range of ψN and p′0 applied, the data points of MLS are clus- The above analysis provides convincing evidence that a
tered within a rather narrow range of normalized qc. This is separate method is called for when interpreting CPT in
an indication that for a given initial stress state, qc in MLS is MLS. The CPT calibration data in MLS were compiled and
considerably less sensitive to ψN (or relative density) in an empirical equation that relates qc to Dr and state of stress
comparison with Ticino sand. The phenomenon is consistent was developed. This equation follows the pattern of
with the result depicted in Fig. 17 where initial σh ′ shows a Fioravante et al. (1991) that considers the effects of σv′ and
much stronger influence than Dr. σh ′ as follows:
The framework by Konrad (1998) calls for a further nor-
malization to consider the differences in p′cs that relate to [5] q c = 230(σv′ ) 0108
.
(σh ′ ) 0.425 exp(1.45Dr )
grain crushing. In this case, the normalized qc obtained in
Note that Dr used in eq. [5] is calculated based on void ra-
eq. [4] is multiplied by the ratio of ( p′csTicino / p′csMLS) that
tios after the application of confining stress. Figure 20
corresponds to the same ψN. The last normalization should
shows a comparison between qc values obtained in the avail-
bring MLS data points closer to those of the Ticino sand, ac-
able chamber CPT and those estimated using eq. [5]. The
cording to Konrad (1998). However, due to the drastic dif-
coefficient of correlation is 0.966.
ferences in λc between MLS and Ticino sand, as shown in
Fig. 12, ( p′csTicino / p′csMLS) increases significantly with ψN.
As a result, the p′cs normalization would shift MLS data Concluding remarks
points into a trend that is opposite to that of the Ticino sand The paper compiled and analyzed a series of in situ test
(i.e., normalized qc increases with ψN), which is apparently data on MLS, a relatively compressible silty fine sand. Lab-
unrealistic. The p′cs normalization implicitly assumes that for oratory experiments were performed to determine the com-
a given p′0 and ψN, sand of different types near the cone tip pressibility, shear strength, and dilatancy of MLS that has a
© 1999 NRC Canada
100 Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 36, 1999
fines content of approximately 15%. A series of CPT were Engineering Division, ASCE, 99(1): 75–93.
conducted in a calibration chamber to evaluate the possible Bolton, M.D. 1986. Strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique,
differences between tests in MLS and those in clean, uni- 36(1): 65–78.
formly graded quartz sand. Based on the findings of these El-Sohby, M.A., and Andrawes, K.Z. 1972. Deformation character-
studies, the following conclusions are made. istics of granular materials under hydrostatic compression. Ca-
(1) For a compressible sand such as MLS, the change in nadian Geotechnical Journal, 9(3): 338–350.
void ratio as a result of static loading can be many times that Fioravante, V., Jamiolkowski, M., Tanizawa, F., and Tatsuoka, F.
of a clean, uniformly graded quartz sand. The effects of 1991. Result of CPTs in Toyoura quartz sand. In Proceedings of
compressibility should not be ignored for MLS in the inter- the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber
pretation of test data. Testing, Potsdam, N.Y. Edited by A.-B. Huang. Elsevier, New
York, pp. 135–146.
(2) The φ′crit of MLS is comparable with the lower end of
Hardin, B.O. 1985. Crushing of soil particles. Journal of the
a quartz sand. However, the range of φ′max – φ′crit for MLS is
Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 111(10): 1177–1192.
relatively small compared with quartz sand. This is a result
Houlsby, G.T., and Hitchman, R. 1988. Calibration chamber tests
of the lack of dilatancy of MLS.
of a cone penetrometer in sands. Géotechnique, 38(1): 39–44.
(3) For a given initial stress state, qc in MLS is consider-
Huang, A.B., and Ma, M.Y. 1994. An analytical study of cone pen-
ably less sensitive to ψN (or relative density) in comparison etration tests in granular material. Canadian Geotechnical Jour-
with clean quartz sand. nal, 31(1): 91–103.
(4) Normalizing CPT results in MLS following the frame- Huang, A.B., Bunting, R.D., and Carney, T.C. 1991. Piezoblade
work proposed by Konrad (1998), without considering that tests in a clay chamber. In Proceedings of the First International
the differences of compressibility may be unrealistic. The Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing, Potsdam, N.Y.
analysis of available data provides convincing evidence that Edited by A.-B. Huang. Elsevier, New York, pp. 161–174.
a separate method is called for when interpreting CPT in Ishihara, K. 1993. Liquefaction and flow failure during earth-
MLS. quakes. The 33rd Rankine Lecture. Géotechnique, 43(3): 351–
(5) For MLS, there appears to be a consistent relationship 415.
between qc and σh ′. The qc values obtained from available Joustra, K., and de Gijt, J.F. 1982. Results and interpretation of
chamber CPT show a coefficient of correlation of 0.966 with cone penetration tests in soils of different mineralogical compo-
those estimated using the empirical equation developed sition. In Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on
herein. Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 2,
(6) The laboratory experiments described in this paper are pp. 615–626.
restricted to MLS with a fines content of approximately Koerner, R.M. 1970a. Effect of particle characteristics on soil
15%. Further studies are necessary to determine the effects strength. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engi-
of different fines contents on the behavior of MLS. neering Division, ASCE, 96(4): 1221–1234.
Koerner, R.M. 1970b. Behavior of single mineral soils in triaxial
shear. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engi-
Acknowledgments neering Division, ASCE, 96(4): 1373–1390.
This research was conducted under a contract with the Konrad, J.M. 1998. Sand state from cone penetrometer tests: a
Construction Engineering Division of the Formosa Plastics framework considering grain crushing stress. Géotechnique,
Group, Taipei, Taiwan. The National Science Council of the 48(2): 201–215.
Republic of China provided additional funding under con- Kulhawy, F.H., and Mayne, P.W. 1991. Relative density, SPT, and
tracts 82-0115-E-009-373 and 83-0410-E-009-026. CPT interrelationships. In Proceedings of the First International
Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing, Potsdam, N.Y.
Edited by A.-B. Huang. Elsevier, New York, pp. 197–211.
References Lade, P.V., Yamamuro, J.A., and Bopp, P.A. 1996. Significance of
Baldi, G., Belloti, R., Ghiona, V., Jamiolkowski, M., and particle crushing in granular materials. Journal of the
Pasqualini, E. 1986. Interpretation of CPTs and CPTUs. Part 2. Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 122(4): 309–316.
Drained penetration of sands. In Proceedings of the Fourth In- Lee, K.L., and Farhoomand, I. 1967. Compressibility and crushing
ternational Geotechnical Seminar on Field Instrumentation and of granular soils in anisotropic triaxial compression. Canadian
in situ Measurements, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singa- Geotechnical Journal, 4(1): 68–86.
pore, pp. 129–156. McNeilan, T.W., and Bugno, W.T. 1984. Cone penetration test re-
Been, K., and Jefferies, M.G. 1985. A state parameter for sands. sults in offshore california silts. In Proceedings of the Sympo-
Géotechnique, 35(2): 99–112. sium on Strength Testing of Marine Sediments: Laboratory and
Been, K., Jefferies, M.G., and Hachey, J. 1991. The critical state of in-situ Measurements, San Diego, Calif. ASTM STP 883,
sands. Géotechnique, 41(3): 365–381. pp. 55–71.
Bellotti, R., and Pedroni, S. 1991. Design and development of a Mesri, G., Feng, T.W., and Benak, J.M. 1990. Postdensification
small calibration chamber for compressible sands. In Proceed- penetration resistance of clean sands. Journal of the
ings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Cham- Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 116(7): 1095–1115.
ber Testing, Potsdam, N.Y. Edited by A.-B. Huang. Elsevier, Parkin, A.K. 1988. The calibration of cone penetrometers. In Pro-
New York, pp. 91–100. ceedings of the First International Symposium on Penetration
Bishop, A.W., and Green, G.E. 1965. The influence of end restraint Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, Fla. Edited by De Ruiter. Balkema,
on the compression strength of a cohesionless soil. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 221–243.
Géotechnique, 15(3): 243–266. Rix, G.J., and Stokoe, K.H. 1991. Correlation of initial tangent
Black, D.K., and Lee, K.L. 1973. Saturating laboratory samples by modulus and cone penetration resistance. In Proceedings of the
back pressure. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing,
© 1999 NRC Canada
Huang et al. 101
Potsdam, N.Y. Edited by A.-B. Huang. Elsevier, New York, Voyiadjis, G.Z., Kurup, P.U., and Tumay, M.T. 1993. Preparation
pp. 351–362. of large-size cohesive specimens for calibration chamber testing.
Salgado, R., Mitchell, J.K., and Jamiolkowski, M. 1997. Cavity ex- Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 16(3): 339–349.
pansion and penetration resistance in sand. Journal of Yamamuro, J.A., Bopp, P.A., and Lade, P.V. 1996. One dimen-
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, sional compression of sands at high pressures. Journal of the
123(4): 344–354. Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 122(2): 147–154.
Vesic, A.S., and Clough, G.W. 1968. Behavior of granular materi- Yu, H.S., and Houlsby, G.T. 1991. Finite cavity expansion in
als under high stresses. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foun- dilatant soils: loading analysis. Géotechnique, 41(1): 173–183.
dation Engineering Division, ASCE, 94(3): 661–688.