Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Paper
Sample Paper
Maria Rodriguez
Michelle Lee
Alejandro Santos
Benedict Cruz
Gina Divinagracia
Sofia Tanaka
Thesis Adviser
MS. JUVYLANE MANGLICMOT
High School Department
December 2022
Quantifying the Impact of Artificial Intelligence
on Customer Satisfaction: A Comparative Study
by
Maria Rodriguez
Michelle Lee
Alejandro Santos
Benedict Cruz
Gina Divinagracia
Sofia Tanaka
December 2022
APPROVAL SHEET
________________________________________________________________________
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
________________________________________________________________________
Declaration of Originality
We, Maria Rodriguez1, Michelle Lee, Alejandro Santos, Benedict Cruz, Gina
Divinagracia, and Sofia Tanaka, declare that this research is original to the best of our
knowledge. We declare further that this activity was undertaken by us.
DECEMBER 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER PAGE
TITLE PAGE
APPROVAL SHEET
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview and Problem of the Study
1.2 Theories and Related Literature
1.2.1 Theories
1.2.2 Related Literature
1.3 Conceptual Framework
1.4 Objectives of the Study and Hypothesis
1.5 Significance of the Study
1.6 Scope and Delimitation
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research Design
2.2 Sampling Design and Respondents
2.3 Instruments and Procedures
2.4 Data Analysis
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
A. Statement of Project Member Contribution
B. Permission Letter/s
C. Letter of Informed Consent
D. Questionnaire/s
E. Validation Sheets
F. Validation Results
G. Turnitin Result
CURRICULUM VITAE
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Maria Rodriguez1*
Michelle Lee2
Alejandro Santos3
Benedict Cruz4
Gina Divinagracia5
Sofia Tanaka6
1,2
Department of Business Administration, University of Davao, Davao City, Philippines
3,4
School of Information Technology, Kaugmaon University, Davao City, Philippines
1.2.1 Theories
This study is anchored in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Commented [NJAM12]: Name of the theory
Fred D. Davis in 1989, which explains users' acceptance and adoption of new technologies Commented [NJAM13]: Proponent and year
based on perceived usefulness and ease of use. By assessing customers' perceptions of AI- Commented [NJAM14]: HIGHLIGHT/EXPLANATION of the
theory
assisted interactions, the study gains insights into the determinants of customer satisfaction
Commented [NJAM15]: Importance of the theory to the
with AI technologies in Davao City. Additionally, the study incorporates Customer study
Commented [NJAM16]: Theory 2: name of the theory
Experience Management (CEM) theory by Schmitt in 2003, focusing on delivering
Commented [NJAM17]: Name of the proponent and
positive, memorable experiences to customers. CEM examines the relationship between AI year proposed
adoption and customer satisfaction, analyzing the impact of AI-assisted interactions on
aspects such as personalization and service quality to optimize overall customer
satisfaction in Davao City. Commented [NJAM18]: HIGH/EXPLANATION of the
theory, with contextualization to the locale
Integrating TAM and CEM theories in the theoretical framework enables the study
to examine customer satisfaction determinants with AI adoption and the mediating role of
customer experience. Understanding customers' perceptions of AI technologies' usefulness,
ease of use, and holistic experiences during AI-assisted interactions yields valuable insights
for Davao City businesses to optimize their AI-driven customer service and enhance overall
customer satisfaction. Commented [NJAM19]: Relevance of the theories, in
general, to the study.
1.2.2 Related Literature
Various industries have been investigated in prior studies to assess the impact of AI
on customer satisfaction, revealing potential benefits and challenges associated with its
adoption (Smith et al., 2018). For instance, in retail, AI-driven chatbots positively Commented [NJAM20]: Move 1, Strategy 1A
influenced satisfaction by delivering quick and efficient responses to inquiries (Poe et al.,
2018). Similarly, AI's role in the banking industry streamlined customer service processes, Commented [NJAM21]: Move 1, Strategy 1C
improving satisfaction levels (Johnson & Lee, 2019). AI-driven healthcare services in the
healthcare sector enhance patient satisfaction through personalized care and improved
accessibility (Gonzales & Santos, 2020). In e-commerce, AI-driven personalized
recommendations increase customer engagement and satisfaction (Brown & Williams,
2021). Customer demographics, such as age, gender, and prior AI experience, influenced
satisfaction with AI-based customer service (Rodriguez & Ramirez, 2022). However, Commented [NJAM22]: Move 2, Strategy 2B
Ho: The two groups have no significant differences in the satisfaction ratings. Objective 2 is an inferential objective (identifying the
significant difference)
Commented [NJAM27]: Since there is an inferential
objective, there is a hypothesis. Note that the number of
hypothesis depends on the number of inferential objectives.
1.5 Significance of the Study
This study's findings will provide valuable insights for businesses in Davao City
regarding the effective integration of AI technologies in customer service processes. By
understanding the impact of AI on customer satisfaction across industries, organizations
can make informed decisions about adopting and optimizing AI-driven customer service.
Additionally, the research will contribute to the academic literature on AI adoption and
customer satisfaction in the specific context of Davao City, bridging the research gap
identified in the existing body of knowledge.
2. Methodology
statistical significance and power analysis principles. Approximately 400 respondents were
recruited and equally distributed across the selected industries to ensure adequate
representation. Commented [NJAM32]: Elaboration of the number of
respondents
2.3 Instruments and Procedures
The collected data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Descriptive
statistics, such as means, were used to summarize demographic characteristics and
customer satisfaction ratings. Comparative analyses, such as t-tests, assessed the Commented [NJAM35]: This answers Objective 1. The
descriptive frequency used is the mean. Note that this varies
differences in customer satisfaction levels between AI-assisted and human-assisted depending on the suggestion of your research adviser and
panelists.
interactions. Statistical software, such as SPSS or R, was utilized for data analysis.
Commented [NJAM36]: This answers Objective 2. This is
the inferential statistics (t-test) and justification.
3. Results and Discussion
Commented [NJAM37]: Include what software is used in
analyzing the data.
3.1 Customer Satisfaction in AI-Assisted Interactions versus Human-Assisted Interactions
Table 1 presents the customer satisfaction ratings for AI-assisted interactions and
human-assisted interactions across different industries.
Table 2
Customer ratings in AI-assisted interactions versus human-assisted interactions in
different industries
Human-
AI-assisted
Industry Description assisted Description
Interaction
Interaction
1. Retail 4.2 High 4.0 High
2. Service Industries 4.2 High 4.0 High
3. Financial Institutions 4.2 High 4.0 High
Overall 4.2 High 4.0 High
In the retail sector, the mean satisfaction rating for AI-assisted interactions was 4.2,
slightly higher than the mean rating of 4.0 for human-assisted interactions. A similar pattern
is observed in the service industries and financial institutions, where AI-assisted
interactions received higher mean satisfaction ratings than human-assisted interactions. Commented [NJAM38]: Reporting and summarizing the
results
These findings suggest that AI-assisted interactions in customer service positively impact
customer satisfaction in Davao City. Customers appear to experience slightly higher
satisfaction levels when engaging with AI-driven systems compared to traditional human
interactions. Commented [NJAM39]: Interpreting the result
As observed in these findings, these are aligned with the trends suggested in the
previously reviewed studies. For instance, the study by Smith et al. (2018) on the impact
of AI-driven chatbots in the retail sector reported a higher level of customer satisfaction
with AI-assisted interactions, which is consistent with the results of the present study in the
retail industry. Additionally, the paper by Gonzales and Santos (2020) on enhancing patient
satisfaction through AI-driven healthcare services highlighted the positive influence of AI
on customer satisfaction. While the current study focuses on different industries, the
findings demonstrate a similar pattern, indicating that AI-assisted interactions contribute to
higher customer satisfaction. Similarly, Brown and Williams (2021) explored the effects of
AI-driven personalized recommendations on customer satisfaction in e-commerce. Commented [NJAM40]: Comparing results with
literature
Although the present study does not specifically examine personalized
recommendations, the overall trend of AI-assisted interactions leading to higher customer
satisfaction is consistent with the notion that AI technologies can enhance customer
experiences across different sectors. Commented [NJAM41]: Accounting for the results
3.2 Significant differences in satisfaction ratings between the two groups
Table 2 presents the results of the t-test analysis, which aimed to compare the mean
satisfaction ratings between AI-assisted interactions and human-assisted interactions
within different industries. The t-value and p-value were calculated to determine the
statistical significance of the differences.
Table 3
T-Test Analysis on Customer Satisfaction Ratings between AI-assisted and Human-
assisted Interactions
Industry t-value p-value Remarks
1. Retail 2.34 0.032
2. Service Industries 2.34 0.032 Reject Ho
3. Financial Institutions 2.34 0.032
In all three industries (Retail, Service Industries, and Financial Institutions), the t-
tests revealed statistically significant differences between AI-assisted interactions and
human-assisted interactions. The t-value of 2.34 and p-value of 0.032 indicate that the mean
satisfaction ratings for AI-assisted interactions were significantly higher compared to
human-assisted interactions. These findings align with the literature, suggesting that AI
adoption positively impacts customer satisfaction (Smith, Johnson, & Williams, 2018;
Johnson & Lee, 2019; Gonzales & Santos, 2020). The literature review highlighted similar
trends, where studies reported improved customer satisfaction levels using AI-driven
technologies in various industries.
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Limitations
While this study provides valuable insights into the impact of AI on customer
satisfaction in the context of Davao City, certain limitations need to be considered. Firstly,
the study employed a comparative design, comparing AI-assisted and human-assisted
interactions, which may not capture the full range of AI applications and their effects on
customer satisfaction. Additionally, the study relied on self-reported satisfaction ratings,
which may be subject to respondent bias. Future studies could incorporate objective
customer satisfaction measures or employ qualitative methods to gain deeper insights into
customer experiences.
4.3 Recommendations
Based on the findings and limitations of this study, the researchers recommend
conducting an in-depth industry-specific analysis to understand the factors contributing to
the higher satisfaction levels in AI-assisted interactions, including customer expectations
and the effectiveness of AI technologies in addressing industry-specific challenges. It is
also recommended to explore the customers' perception and trust in AI-driven interactions,
investigating how AI systems' transparency, explainability, and trustworthiness influence
customer satisfaction and trust in AI technologies. Lastly, investigate the ethical
implications of AI adoption in customer service and its impact on customer satisfaction
that focuses on concerns related to data privacy, bias, fairness, and accountability in AI-
driven interactions and their potential effects on customer satisfaction.
References
Johnson, M. & Lee, S. (2019). Exploring the role of AI in improving customer satisfaction
in the banking industry.
Johnson, R., Garcia, M., & Santos, L. (2022). The impact of AI adoption on customer
satisfaction in Davao City's retail sector. Journal of Customer Satisfaction, 10(2),
45-58.
Martinez, E., Reyes, B., & Cruz, D. (2024). Assessing the influence of AI-assisted
interactions on customer satisfaction in Davao City's financial institutions. Journal
of AI in Business, 15(1), 28-42.
Smith, J., Johnson, R., & Williams, A. (2018). The Impact of AI-Driven Chatbots on
Customer Satisfaction in the Retail Sector.
Tan, A., Lim, C., & Fernandez, J. (2023). Exploring the effects of AI integration on
customer satisfaction in the service industry of Davao City. International Journal
of AI Applications, 7(3), 112-127.
APPENDIX A
Permission Letter
APPENDIX C
Dear Respondent:
Thank you for agreeing to participate in this research study. Your valuable insights will
contribute to a better understanding of the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on customer
satisfaction in Davao City. Please take a few minutes to answer the following questions.
Your responses will remain confidential and will be used for research purposes only.
Part 1: Demographic Information
Age: ___ 18-23 years old ___ 30-35 years old ___ 41-45 years old
___ 24-29 years old ___ 36-40 years old ___ 45-up years old
Gender: ___ Male ___ Female
How often do you interact
Always Frequently Occasionally Rarely Never
with customer service in the
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
following industries?
1. Retail
2. Service Industries
3. Financial Institutions
2. Have you recently interacted with human-assisted customer service in any selected
industries? ____ Yes ___ No
Part 2: Customer Satisfaction Ratings
For the following questions, please rate your level of satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5,
with 1 being "Not Satisfied" and 5 being "Highly Satisfied."
Highly Moderately Highly
AI-Assisted Satisfied Dissatisfied
Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
Interactions (4) (2)
(5) (3) (1)
1. Overall
satisfaction with
AI-assisted
interactions
2. Perceived
usefulness of AI-
assisted
interactions
3. Perceived ease
of use of AI-
assisted
interactions
Highly Moderately Highly
Human Satisfied Dissatisfied
Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
Interactions (4) (2)
(5) (3) (1)
1. Overall
satisfaction with
human
interactions
2. Perceived
usefulness of
human
interactions
3. Perceived ease
of use of human
interactions
Do you have additional comments or suggestions about your experiences with AI-assisted
or human-assisted customer service interactions?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX E
Validation Sheet
5 4 3 2 1
1. CLARITY of DIRECTIONS and ITEMS
The question's vocabulary level, language structure, and
concept suit the respondents' level. The test direction and items
are written clearly and understandably.
2. PRESENTATIONS/ORGANIZATION of ITEMS
The items are organized logically.
3. SUITABILITY of ITEMS
The items appropriately represent the substance of the
research. The questions are designed to determine the
conditions, knowledge, skills, and attitudes that should be
measured.
4. ADEQUATENESS of ITEMS per CATEGORY
The items represent the coverage of the research adequately.
The number of questions per category is representative enough
of all questions needed for the research.
5. ATTAINMENT of the PURPOSE
The instrument as a whole fulfills the objective for which it is
constructed.
6. OBJECTIVITY
Each item question only one specific answer or measure only
one behavior, and no aspect of the questionnaire suggests bias
on the part of the research.
7. SCALE and EVALUATION in RATING SYSTEM
The scale adopted is appropriate for the items.
Remarks:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
________________________
Signature over Printed Name
APPENDIX F
Validation Results
Turnitin Result
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL INFORMATION
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
AWARDS/ACHIEVEMENTS
Skill/s:
Talents:
Hobbies: