Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.

com

LewRockwell.com
anti-state • anti-war • pro-market

Wenzel on Libertarianism and the Right


By Robert Wenzel
Target Liberty
November 9, 2016

Below are the remarks as prepared for delivery by Robert Wenzel for the Ninth Annual
H.L. Mencken Cub Conference in Baltimore, Maryland on November 5, 2016.

When I was first asked to participate here at the H.L. Mencken Club conference I was
asked to speak on Libertarianism and the Right.

I wasn’t aware that this was a mere subtopic under the broader title Enemies of the
Right. For I am a libertarian but come here as a friend of the right or at least the right
that I believe is represented here at this conference. I consider us cousins.

Now before I get any further, I must define my terms. There are many people running
around calling themselves libertarians these days that in my view are far from
libertarian.

There are two men one by the name of Gary Johnson and the other by the name of
William Weld that claim to be libertarians.  One of these men, Bill Weld, who is the vice
presidential candidate of the Libertarian Party, this week  essentially told libertarians to
vote for Hillary Clinton. Go Figure.

There is a Silicon Valley billionaire who claims to be a libertarian and yet in a speech he
delivered this past week in Washington D.C., he raised concerns about free market
ideology.

Current Prices on popular forms of Gold Bullion

I am not making this up. I quote:

“Voters are tired of hearing conservative politicians say that government never works.”

And

“[W]e cannot let free market ideology serve as an excuse for the decline.”

There are those claiming to be libertarians who would like to slip in some cultural

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 1/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
g p
Marxists themes and general social justice themes into libertarianism

I hasten to add that on a personal level I have no problems with gays, those of other
races and I have lived in urban centers most of my adult life. I like to interact with those
different from me. That said, I do not believe that libertarianism provides any guidance
on such matters.

Libertarianism is about the non-aggression principle and a foundational respect for


private property. You should be allowed to do whatever you choose to do on your
property, ban whomever you want and rent to him whomever you want and refrain from
renting from to those you do not want to rent to or be free to not associate with anyone
you don’t want to.

As the great libertarian Murray Rothbard put it:

Libertarianism…is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion,
should be free to do as he sees fit, except invade the person or property of another.
What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to
libertarianism…Libertarianism does not offer a way of life; it offers liberty so that each
person is free to adopt and act upon his own values and moral principles.

So in other words, if you hold particular views that do not violate the non-aggression
principle and respect for private property, you are not going to get flack from
libertarians, as libertarians, that you should somehow be coerced by the hand of
government to change your views and actions.

To the degree the right incorporates certain cultural values in its worldview, you are not
going to see libertarians siccing the government on the right to coerce members of the
right to act differently.

Libertarianism is about leaving people alone. It is about total freedom with the exception
of objection to physical aggression against person or property.

I understand the views of the right as reflected by those here today as being generally in
favor of the very limited government. This, of course, does not reflect all of the right. The
neo-conservatives, for one, are quite happy with a large government that spreads its
military might around the world.

So in a very important way libertarians and the right in this room, which Paul Gottfried
calls the real right,  are on the same road. We stand on this road virtually alone in
desiring to shrink government and shrink it a lot, I am not talking about the phony
shrinkage that so-called conservatives in Congress propose, what Gottfried calls
Conservative Inc.

That libertarians and the real right are very close in our views can be seen even more
clearly when we contrast libertarianism and the right versus the left. The left is fully
about expanding the state and gaining power in the expanded state.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 2/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

The action handbook of the left, Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals tells the left;

The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves to hold power. Rules for Radicals is
written for the have-nots to take it away.

And they have no qualms about using any method necessary to gain power. From Rules
for Radicals again ;

In war, the end justifies almost any means.

And In action one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is both with one’s
individual conscience and the good of mankind… He who sacrifices the mass good for his
personal conscience has a peculiar perception of “personal salvation’;he doesn’t care
enough for people to be ‘corrupted’ for them”

It took me some time to realize how different the current day left is from libertarians and
the right. They are truly about gaining power and will say and do pretty much anything
to gain it.

Vox Day was very accurate when he titled his book SJWs Always Lie.

This really hit me when I attended a World Affairs Council event in San Francisco some
years back. I was sitting next to a woman who was a lefty and the discussion between us
somehow turned to Paul Krugman. I said to her that in certain ways he doesn’t
understand economics very well and at other times he just outright lies in his New York
Times columns.

Her response to me was,”Well. it concerns me if there is something he doesn’t


understand but I don’t mind if he lies in his columns.”

This is the Left we are dealing with. It is an end justifies the means Left, and they will
say and do anything.

Hayek understood, way before Saul Alinsky put pen to paper to provide tactics to the
Left, why this happens. Hayek wrote in The Road to Serfdom in 1944.

The principle that the end justifies the means is in individualist ethics regarded as the
denial of all morals. In collectivist ethics, it becomes necessarily consistent collectivist
must not be prepared to do if it serves “the good of the whole” because the”good of the
whole” is to him the only criterion of what ought to be done. The raison d’etat, in which
collectivist ethics has found its most explicit formulation, knows no other limit than that
set by the expediency-the suitability of the particular act for the end in view.

All this said I see no need for the right here to buy into the no-government philosophy of
libertarianism. That is a proposition that libertarians need to advance on our own and we
have a long way to go to get that advancement.

In my view there is no Private Property Society magnum opus that is similar to the

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 3/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
In my view, there is no Private Property Society magnum opus that is similar to the
magnum opus that exists in economics in the form of Human Action by Ludwig von
Mises.

Murray Rothbard did heroic work in advancing the concept of anarcho-capitalism but
there is much further to go. The theory needs much more development and better
descriptions of how a libertarian society could emerge.

I agree with Paul Gottfried when in his 2008 speech to this very group, he said:

It is one thing to deplore the modern welfare state as a vehicle of grotesque social
change or for its violations of the U.S. Constitution. It is another matter to believe that
all authority structures can be reduced to insurance companies formed to protect the
property and lives of anarcho-capitalists. Such a belief goes counter to everything we
know about human Nature.

The idea that insurance companies are the answer to a Private Property Society is a
stretch to be gentle about it. It ignores,as Gottfried states, how societies develop. It
indicates a failure to understand how businesses operate and most remarkably displays a
failure to understand the nature of insurance.

I can assure you that no anarcho-capitalist society will ever emerge where you are going
to have to show an insurance card to enter Macy’s as some have proposedI have also
heard libertarians suggest that insurance programs would emerge that would protect
against a massive global nuclear war.

If there are any libertarians here in the room that support the insurance structure of an
anarcho-capitalist society and want to buy insurance against a full out global nuclear war,
I will write you  the policies during the next break in the back of the room. Give me a
check now and I will pay you damages after you and the world are blown to smithereens
in a nuclear attack.

We libertarians have a lot of work before us to explain how our type of society would
emerge and function.

That said, there is a great giant that must be stopped from growing and the growth must
be reversed and that giant is the interventionist mentality that permeates every nook
and cranny of this country and  the world, including the education system, mainstream
media, and the masses who  have been bombarded with interventionist propaganda.

Here libertarians and the real right can work together. We are far outnumbered by those
who want to see the state grow, There is no reason that we need to promote each other
where differences do exist but there is no reason that we shouldn’t work together where
we agree.

As an example, the monster cultural Marxism must be defeated. There is absolutely no


reason that libertarians can not post on their blogs and websites and otherwise promote
the video on the Frankfurt School created by real right thinker William Lind. If you

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 4/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianismyand the Right
g - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
y
 haven’t seen this video I urge you to see it. In a conversation last night with Bill, he tells
me that there are some serious people who may have an interest in promoting the video.
This is the kind of work that needs to get out that promotes the important understanding
that both libertarians and the real right can agree on.

Whenever we can, we should promote each other’s views, where they do not conflict with
our basic principles and that has to be at least 70% of the time. We are simply
outgunned to such a vast degree that it is important that we support each other when we
can.

Political correctness and interventionist views simply permanate now. A business


acquaintance recently told me the story about a major Silicon Valley firm, I have been
sworn to secrecy to not reveal the name. The CEO of the firm gave a company-wide
address via a video conference. After he completed his formal remarks, he opened the
conference up to questions.

One employee asked about a future earnings report. The CEO talked about corporate
earnings but was alleged to have made a microaggression so that he had to send an
apology letter out about his comment on earnings!

I believe it is fair to say that the Cultural Marxists have captured the minds of the
masses.

Paul Gottfried was correct when he said last night that The Left has been triumphant.
They have gained control of the views toward culture and the nature of government.

BUT Not only is cultural Marxism and interventionist schemes, in general, a problem but
we are being directly attacked and plotted against.

I have read about 15% of the Podesta emails released by Wikileaks . While it is
noteworthy to see the cooperation between the Clinton campaign and the DOJ and
mainstream news media, I found of  perhaps greater significance the plotting Hillary
people are already planning for a Clinton administration, as revealed in the leaked
emails.

One email, in particular, etive HIllary group in the development stages. The group is the
creation of  Clinton economic adviser Heather Boushey who is sure to get a major
position in a Clinton administration. From the memo on the nature of the group:

[A] standing, but informal, group to engage with and advise us on the policy and political
conversations happening at the highest levels in Washington…It will consist of a small
group (3-4 people) of permanent members and several others who are rotated in and
out of participation depending on the subject of each particular meeting… Equitable
Growth [where Boushey is president] plans to host two meetings in 2016, and in 2017
will begin quarterly meetings of the group. The meetings will be held in Washington, DC,
and Equitable Growth will provide dinner, and, when necessary, travel and
accommodations for members and/or the expert academic.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 5/8
13/12/21 16:17
/Libertarianism and
p the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

The memo lists 8 potential topics, including the taxation of capital, another on inequality.
One curiously enough on The Next Recession.

I am not sure if they are expecting a recession or plotting one but is there on the agenda
of potential topics.

But those of you here should find this agenda topic most interesting:

The Rise of Extremely Conservative Politics

They are talking about us, folk, and it is not to create a reach out effort.

Ii is clear that we will be under active attack in a Clinton administration. The niceties of
the differences between libertarianism and the right are not going to matter.

We have to be on high alert for whatever they are plotting here and create a unified front
against it.

I spent last week in Washington DC talking to DC insiders and was told that the dynamics
are such that the horrific interventionist Elizabeth Warren will be a significant Senate
player in a Hillary administration that she will pull Hillary more to the left than she
already is.

If Donald Trump does lose, however, his campaign has done wonders in bulldozing the
old cozy establishment Republican party. A great vacuum will be created that will have to
be filled. It will be an opportunity for us to provide intellectual guidance as Trump
followers and other rank and file Republicans look for direction.

Yesterday, I had a discussion with Prof. Stanley Payne and the conversation turned to the
radical left of the 1960s that really didn’t have an intellectual foundation at its beginning.
It was the Marxists of the Frankfurt School who opportunistically provided the
foundation.

We can provide our own intellectual foundation, if Hillary wins, to those who will be anti-
Hillary.

There will be many looking for sound arguments to justify their hate of Hillary. We can
supply it.

If Trump is elected, given that he appears to not have any strong foundational
philosophical  thinking behind his views, the opportunity arises once again to provide
intellectual guidance.

As best as I can gather, the insiders on Capitol Hill view Trump as being lazy. He is known
as a non-reader and is unwilling to even read 2-page briefing papers. They hope, and
this really is “their plan,” that after being elected Trump will spend most of his time on
golf courses so that business continues as usual on The Hill. He may focus on a couple of
issues but for the most part they believe (hope) it will be business as usual
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 6/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com
issues but for the most part, they believe (hope) it will be business as usual.

Our role under this scenario would be to be the watchdogs against business as usual and
be loud about it so that Trump gets wind of it or the masses object so that Trump can not
ignore the objections. But our best attacks during a Trump administration will likely be in
the area of political correctness.  To the degree, we can point to all the areas of influence
where cultural Marxism resides, and how to eradicate it, the more influence we will have.
Important influence.

Trump may not be able to articulate it in these terms but if he is elected it would be
because  he  rode into office on a reactionary movement that includes reaction against
cultural Marxism. We know how to deliver the intellectual heft to justify the destruction of
that culture.

And although Trumps isn’t a reader, there are aides of his that are. He has some very
bad neocons around him but there are others that I have a more positive view of. In fact,
Bill Lind told me last night that the campaign reached out to him to get a copy of his
book, The Next Conservatism.

We are in a unique period in history, we should not let it go to waste. We are small in
number and in funding and in mainstream support but we are powerful in intellectual
depth. We bring flamethrowers to a knife fight. We just need to watch one another’s
backs.

We are a tough breed: Those of us that are pure libertarians and the real right
represented by those in this room. All of us are sufficiently talented to find cushy jobs
within the establishment. We are here because we put principle above it all. This makes
us different from leftists and those on the right who can be bought off.

A time of turmoil, which is likely ahead, regardless of who gets elected, is a time when
many look for new answers. We have those answers. In this sense, there is a great
opportunity ahead.

But we will continue to be attacked viciously from multiple sides.

Cousins we are going to need to stick together to battle the attacks.  It is going to be a
great battle, an intellectual battle that offers the opportunity to turn the tide away from
growing government, cultural Marxist infiltration  and a general view that government
intervention is somehow a must everywhere.

Reprinted with permission from Target Liberty.

The Best of Robert Wenzel

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 7/8
13/12/21 16:17 Libertarianism and the Right - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Privacy Policy

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/11/robert-wenzel/libertarianism-right/ 8/8

You might also like