The document summarizes the steps taken in a mediation between two parties. It outlines discussing the problem from each perspective, suggesting alternative approaches, establishing ground rules for discussion, listening to each party's wants, clarifying expectations, and agreeing on steps forward. The two parties were able to find compromises to their issues around one person's eating habits affecting the other's health and the TV being left on at night disturbing sleep. They agreed to make changes to accommodate each other's needs.
(Environmental Pollution 16) Kai Bester, Christa S. McArdell, Cajsa Wahlberg, Thomas D. Bucheli (Auth.), Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Kai Bester, Klaus Kümmerer (Eds.) - Xenobiotics in The Urban Water
The document summarizes the steps taken in a mediation between two parties. It outlines discussing the problem from each perspective, suggesting alternative approaches, establishing ground rules for discussion, listening to each party's wants, clarifying expectations, and agreeing on steps forward. The two parties were able to find compromises to their issues around one person's eating habits affecting the other's health and the TV being left on at night disturbing sleep. They agreed to make changes to accommodate each other's needs.
The document summarizes the steps taken in a mediation between two parties. It outlines discussing the problem from each perspective, suggesting alternative approaches, establishing ground rules for discussion, listening to each party's wants, clarifying expectations, and agreeing on steps forward. The two parties were able to find compromises to their issues around one person's eating habits affecting the other's health and the TV being left on at night disturbing sleep. They agreed to make changes to accommodate each other's needs.
The document summarizes the steps taken in a mediation between two parties. It outlines discussing the problem from each perspective, suggesting alternative approaches, establishing ground rules for discussion, listening to each party's wants, clarifying expectations, and agreeing on steps forward. The two parties were able to find compromises to their issues around one person's eating habits affecting the other's health and the TV being left on at night disturbing sleep. They agreed to make changes to accommodate each other's needs.
- Party #1 wants the other person to eat healthier. The food is negatively affecting their heart, is costlier, and isn’t allowed in their diet. So, they would appreciate if they would cut down in the future. - Party #2 wants the other person to sleep with the TV off. They recognize how talking helps them fall asleep, but the light and noise from it makes it difficult for them to do the same. Step #2: Alternative Approach - I suggested that party #1 might listen with headphones to that sound or try listening to a podcast at a reduced volume. That would allow them to continue hearing those voices in their sleep but with a lower annoyance to the other. - I suggested that party #2 might continue eating but limit it to a few days and ensure that the food is disposed of before the other returns home. That permits them to continue eating their food, but in moderation and not to distract the other. Step #3: Your Ground Rules - I notified both parties that each would be allocated one minute to speak uninterrupted. The other can yield more time if interested, but it ensures each person has the room to speak without fear of criticism. - I specified that they could disagree with the other, but only if they could provide a reason why and a rebuttal. That helps the discussion flow instead of them acting retaliatory. - I mandated that after a topic point was concluded, it would not be rehashed until this mediation reached its end. That progresses the discussion to other points they might have wanted to be amended. Step #4: You Listen to their Wants - Party #1 explained how they feared for their health (due to family history) and their temptation toward that food. Party #2 expressed how that was their comfort food, but was caught off-guard by that fear for their health. Recognizing that it could be limited to a couple of times a week instead. - Party #2 stated how much the tv being on impacted their sleeping patterns and inquired about if they could sleep without the light and/or lighter sound. Party #1 stressed how important it was to listen to something while acknowledging that it can be modified. Step #5: Expected Results - Party #1 was asked if the problem was more of a temptation for them, impacting the other’s appearance, or genuine fear for their health. They stated that it was mainly about temptation. - Party #2 was asked if they had issues with having a program on or what the program was. They noted that although they didn’t like the program, it was mainly the light being emitted. Say Yes 3
Step #6: Steps Forward
- Party #1 agreed to listen to audiobooks/podcasts when in bed and not critique the other’s diet as much. - Party #2 agreed to restrict their fast food intake to the outside of the house and to try earplugs/blindfolds if they struggle to sleep again.
(Environmental Pollution 16) Kai Bester, Christa S. McArdell, Cajsa Wahlberg, Thomas D. Bucheli (Auth.), Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Kai Bester, Klaus Kümmerer (Eds.) - Xenobiotics in The Urban Water