working classes and focus on higher scope Globalization production of material goods rather than raw - The sharing of culture, and money and materials. products, between countries that is happening Periphery Countries because of international trade, and advances in transportation and communication. - Are those in Latin America and Africa International trade has influenced changes and tend to have a relatively weak across borders for centuries. government. - A social process where people become - They tend to depend on only one type more and more aware of other cultures and of economic activity like extracting raw peoples, across geographical and political and materials. social borders. The economic interdependence - There’s a high percentage of poor and of different countries, as well as advancements uneducated people, as well as a small upper in communication technology, and the progress class which controls most of the economy and of technology in general, have all contributed creates a huge inequality in the population. to globalization. - These countries are greatly influenced Silk and Spice Trade Routes by core countries and transnational - Began as early as the 1st century BCE in corporations which can harm the future East Asia economic potential of the periphery countries. - Introduced different cultures and Semi-Periphery Countries linked the economies of different nations. As - India and Brazil make up the middle did the English and Dutch shipping empires in ground between core and periphery. the 16th century. - They are often not dominant in Theories of Globalization international trade, but they have a relatively - World-systems Theory diversified and developed economy. - Modernization Theory - These semi-periphery countries can come either from periphery countries moving - Dependency Theory up toward the industrialized core countries, or World-systems Theory dorm core countries declining toward periphery status. - Focuses on the importance of the world as a unit, rather than looking at individual countries. It divides the world into three The World-systems theory is a fluid model, but regions: core countries, periphery countries, it is criticized for being too focused on the and semi-periphery countries. economy and the core countries, and Core Countries forgetting about the culture of even the class struggles of individual countries. - Western Europe and the United States. - These countries have a strong central government with enough tax to support it. They are economically diversified, industrialized, and relatively independent of Modernization Theory theorists don’t agree whether this is good or bad. - Proposes that all countries follow a similar path of development from a traditional Skeptical Perspective to a modern society. - Is critical globalization and considers - Assumes that with some help today’s international processes as becoming traditional countries can develop into modern regionalized rather than globalized. Countries countries in the same way that today’s modern borders are not becoming less important. The countries developed in the first place. It looks third world countries aren’t being integrated at the internal social dynamics as the country into the global economy with the same benefits adapts to new technologies, and the political as first world countries. Skeptics don’t believe and social changes that occur. that the current economy is leading towards global capitalism. Transnational corporations Dependency Theory are still tied to their home country and national - A reaction to modernization theory and borders are as important as ever. uses the idea of core and periphery countries Transformationalist Perspective from the World-systems theory to look at the inequalities between countries. - Doesn’t have either a specific outcome. - It is the idea that periphery or third world countries are poor and export resources - They believe that National to the wealthy core of first world countries, not Governments are changing, perhaps becoming because they are in an earlier stage of less important. As to the strong stance of development, but because they have been skeptics take on the marginalization of third integrated into the world-system as an world countries, transformationalists again just undeveloped country. see that the world order is changing, a new world order design is developing. - They have their own structures and features not seen in developed countries and - They state that there are many factors will not accelerate to become a developed that influence the change of the world nation. They are in an unfavorable economic patterns, but that the outcomes of these position that means they don’t even have the changes is just now known. opportunity to improve and develop. They’ll remain poor and dependent on wealthier nations. Globalization has caused many changes in society. It has allowed for international terrorism and civil unrest as different countries Different Ways of Looking at Globalization are interdependent on each other promoting a global community.
Hyper Globalist Perspective
- Sees globalization as a legitimate process, a new age in human history. Countries’ economies become interdependent as the nations’ states themselves become significantly less important. Many individual countries become one global society, though