Discuss the two schools of thought related to the relationship of intelligence

producers and intelligence consumers. Explain each school of thought.

The dispute about who collects and analyzes data on relationships between intelligent

producers and those who receive the producer's intelligence consumers began even before World

War II ended, resulting in today's US intelligent system. The majority of US intelligence analysis

focuses on producer-consumer ties. There are a few hypotheses or points of view on the

intelligent producer-intelligent consumer interaction.

One of the prevailing schools of thought in the relationship of intelligent producer and

intelligent consumer is that “we all want the same thing.” The majority of policymakers, who

are also consumers, operate under the idea that they would receive basic support from the

government for their various policy efforts. Comprising intelligent community support, which

simply denotes a shared interest that motivates intelligent producers to operate in the same way

so that what they make or the data they collect is appropriate for each consumer or recipient in

terms of language and application.

The Consumer Behavior that Matters school of thinking is another school of thought

that cultivates the intelligent producer-consumer connection. In reality, the intelligent consumer

does more than simply receive the manufactured item or information; they are more anticipatory

of materials that will shape their thinking. Consumers assist in the setting of agendas, from

intelligent priorities to data gathering and analysis. Because customers have their priorities and

preferences when it comes to the problems they care about, they serve as a reference point for

manufacturers. They shape the Producer Behaviors that natters in this way.

What is your assessment of each school of thought on this relationship?

 People are bound to diverse interpretations and have their views of events and

knowledge, so the school of thinking that suggests we all desire the same thing is not very

evident. Suggestions that we all want the same thing will lead to intelligent manufacturing or

rules that exclude certain intelligent customers, thereby destroying relationships. It is reasonable

to say that a clever producer has greater control and that the producer must rely heavily on them

to create incredible goods for consumption.

Because an intelligent consumer may combine views on what will come out, consumer

behavior that counts is a school that can establish a healthy relationship between the producer

and the consumer. As a result, intelligent producers will have low prejudice while developing

information items for consumption.

 Reference

Hulnick, A. S. (1986). The intelligence producer–policy consumer linkage: A theoretical

approach. Intelligence and National Security, 1(2), 212-233.

Liu, C. (2020). Multi-agent modeling of the collaborative operation of the producer service

supply chain under the intelligent manufacturing clusters in the Yangtze River Delta.

Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 53(4), 487-492.