Redi Check

Construction Document Review
RediCheck
Interdisciplinary
Coordination
by
William T. Nigro, AIA
Before You Build It … RediCheck It!
Version 4.148
RediCheck Interdisciplinary Coordination

Sixth Edition: December 2015
© Copyright 2015 by William T. Nigro

All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in any form without permission.
Illustrations by Larry Peacock
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

William T. Nigro, AlA, is the originator of the RediCheck system.
RediCheck is in wide use by the United States Navy and is included in
handbooks or guidelines to practice published by the American
Consulting Engineers Council and the American Institute of Architects.
Bill is retired from the Civil Engineer Corps of the United States Navy
where he was Course Director for Design Contract Management, a course that prepared
government personnel for the effective management of architect/engineer contracts. He is a
registered architect in the state of Florida and has conducted many quality assurance seminars
for the American Institute of Architects, University of Wisconsin, Clemson University, private
A/E firms, and the government. He resides in Peachtree City, Georgia where he is the owner of
The RediCheck Firm, a firm specializing in quality assurance reviews and training. The
RediCheck Firm has performed reviews on over $12 billion worth of construction during the last
30 years, and has provided RediCheck training for over 8,000 architects and engineers.
William T. Nigro
The RediCheck Firm, LLC (770) 631-4430
109 Greensway, Suite 100 bnigro@RediCheck.biz
Peachtree City, GA 30269 www.RediCheck-Review.com
TESTIMONIALS
"The review ... is saving millions of dollars and lots of time. We have virtually no changes,and if
not for RediCheck, there would be almost double the RFI's."
David T. Lewis
Senior Project Manager
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“Even though all design disciplines used building information modeling (BIM) through Revit by
Autodesk, RediCheck’s QC review proved to be invaluable as the final coordination.”
Michael S. Moreland
Project Manager
Perkins+Will
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5
Part A – RediCheck
Chapter 1 – Definition and Benefits of RediCheck ............................................................ 7
Chapter 2 – RediCheck in Your Firm ................................................................................. 13
Chapter 3 – Performing the RediCheck Review ................................................................ 19
Part B – Interdisciplinary Checklists
Chapter 4 – Civil/Landscape Interdisciplinary Checklist ................................................... 26
Chapter 5 – Structural Interdisciplinary Checklist ............................................................ 28
Chapter 6 – Architectural Interdisciplinary Checklist ....................................................... 31
Chapter 7 – Mechanical/Plumbing Interdisciplinary Checklist ......................................... 34
Chapter 8 – Electrical Interdisciplinary Checklist .............................................................. 38
Chapter 9 – Food Service Interdisciplinary Checklist ........................................................ 41
Chapter 10 – Specifications Checklist ............................................................................... 42
Chapter 11 – Consolidated RediCheck Checklist .............................................................. 45
Part C – Concepts
Chapter 12 – RediCheck Concepts to Improve the Quality of Contract Documents ........ 51
Part D – Sample RediCheck Discrepancies
Chapter 13 – Sample RediCheck Discrepancies ................................................................ 61
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following for their help and encouragement:
Neil Block, P.E., Neil Block Interests, Houston, TX. Neil first coined the word
“RediCheck".
Frederick W. Coleman, Teacher, The Thatcher School, Ojai, CA. Fred was a
representative of the first liability insurance company to recognize the value of
RediCheck in A/E liability loss prevention.
Charles B. Zucker, AlA, Senior Director, Professional Service Center, The American
Institute of Architects, Washington, DC. Charlie requested I write this book.
William M. Hayden, P.E., Vice President for Corporate Quality, Reynolds, Smith and
Hills, Jacksonville, FL. Bill provided valuable comments with his critiques.
Larry Peacock, Graphic Artist, Portsmouth, VA. Larry created the wonderful character
"Professor At Variance Wythe" and some very entertaining illustrations.
Todd Nigro, Mechanical Engineer, Peachtree City, GA. Todd has been the driving force
in moving RediCheck from the light table to BIM. This latest edition would not be
possible without his expertise.
The architects and engineers that unintentionally provided examples for this manual.
They shall remain nameless.
4
INTRODUCTION
The focus of the RediCheck system is the interface of disciplines. If the design office does
not discover and correct interdisciplinary errors and omissions during the preparation of
contract documents or during a final quality assurance review, the contractor almost assuredly
will, and at the most inopportune time. Work stops, change orders are filed, and project costs
soar. In severe cases, litigation results. RediCheck helps manage the "crack" zone, assuring
that the designer catches interdisciplinary concerns that when caught in the field are often
described as having "fallen through the crack". This manual will reveal simple techniques to
catch these errors when correction on drawings is all that is required.
While administering hundreds of construction contracts that were designed by civilian A/E
firms for the U.S. Navy, I found that approximately 50% of the thousands of change orders that
were negotiated were due to coordination errors that could have been avoided. I would hate
to guess how many times a construction contractor was paid by change order to lower a ceiling
in a room because everything above the ceiling would not fit, or how many change orders
occurred because the voltage, horsepower, or phase for major mechanical equipment varied
between the mechanical and electrical drawings and specifications.
The first three chapters of this manual, Part A, define the RediCheck system, show the
benefits of the system, suggest how to use the system in your firm, and indicate in general how
to perform the RediCheck review.
Part B contains specific interdisciplinary checklists for each of the major disciplines
including: civil, structural, architectural, mechanical/plumbing, electrical, food service, and
specifications. Chapter 11 is a consolidated RediCheck checklist of all disciplines that can be
used during production and/or final quality assurance reviews.
Part C contains RediCheck concepts that will improve the quality of any project and should
be understood by the entire design team prior to the preparation of working drawings.
Part D contains a library of sample discrepancies that were discovered on some recently
reviewed projects. It is always wise to learn from the mistakes of others – the cost and impact
of each of these discrepancies could be significant if not discovered prior to construction.
To add some humor, there are many sketches containing a character by the name of
Professor" At Variance Wythe" whose favorite law is that two objects cannot occupy the same
space at the same time. I hope you find the points he makes not only educational but
enjoyable as well.
5
PART A
REDICHECK
Definition and Benefits of RediCheck ..................................................................... 3
RediCheck in Your Firm ........................................................................................... 8
Performing the RediCheck Review ....................................................................... 14
NOTE
The use of the RediCheck system as part of an A/E’s quality assurance program
may result in premium credits from major liability insurance companies including
DPIC, CNA/Schinnerer, and Shand Morahan.
6
CHAPTER 1
DEFINITION AND BENEFITS

OF REDICHECK
Many types of construction document reviews exist. Constructibility reviews, single

discipline reviews, cost/budget reviews, value engineering, scope reviews, dimension reviews,
and code reviews are frequently used during the preparation of plans and specifications.
Equally important, but often neglected, are interdisciplinary coordination reviews. A major
source of design errors and omissions is the point of interface between disciplines. RediCheck
is a construction document review system specifically designed to address points of interface,
enabling production personnel or a quality assurance reviewer to locate coordination
discrepancies between disciplines. It is a useful tool from early production to the 100% review
stage.
A common question is: “Do I need a system such as RediCheck if we are using BIM and
other software tools?” In short, yes! The technological advances in recent years, such as
Building Information Modeling (BIM), are moving in the right direction concerning document
coordination and increased efficiencies. However, BIM is still evolving and not working to its
full potential. Over the past several years, almost all of the projects we have reviewed are
produced with BIM software and we have found little changes in the types and quantity of
discrepancies. This may be due to a false sense of security that the software and concept
provides. Are all members of the design team using BIM and/or tools that are compatible?
What is the experience level of the personnel using the newest software tools? Our most
technologically savvy clients have found the RediCheck process to be a valuable supplement to
the design team.
7
Most design professionals have had a lack of formal education in the area of
interdisciplinary coordination. Upon graduation from college they may even be intimidated by
other discipline drawings. Architects tend to avoid electrical drawings; electrical engineers tend
to avoid plumbing drawings, etc. Each has been taught to "trust" the other disciplines to
produce drawings which will contribute to a standard of excellence in the final product.
Structural engineers are able to come up with good structural drawings. Mechanical engineers
produce good mechanical drawings. What happens when the mechanical drawings indicate
HVAC ducts in the same location as the concrete beams on the structural drawings? The
structural engineer and the mechanical engineer may have both provided what appeared to be
good documents, but the two disciplines were not coordinated.
Some specific examples of the types of interdisciplinary coordination errors that can be
eliminated with RediCheck are listed below.
• Civil drawings with site plans that have underground utilities such as water, sewer, or
storm lines interfering with locations of electrical substations, power poles, or
underground conduit, duct banks, or storage tanks.
• Landscape drawings with trees in the same location as sewer manholes and sewer
lines, or in the middle of drainage swales on civil drawings.
• Structural drawings with column locations and grid lines that vary with architectural
locations.
• Architectural floor plans that do not match other discipline background floor plans.
• Plumbing drawings with riser diagrams that do not match plumbing fixtures on
architectural floor plans.
• Mechanical drawings that read "see structural drawings for additional roof supports"
while the structural drawings do not indicate such supports.
• Electrical drawings that indicate items of equipment with different horsepower

ratings, voltages, and phases than mechanical drawings and/or specifications.
• Specification sections which refer to other sections that do not exist or that say to
install something "as indicated" or "where indicated" when there is no indication of
the item on the contract drawings.
An average project contains five coordination errors per contract drawing. The number of
coordination errors can be staggering on a large project. A project of 500 drawings will typically
contain 2,500 coordination errors.
The RediCheck interdisciplinary concept is based on the sequence of construction. In a

typical construction contract the contractor will work from the civil drawings first, structural
drawings second, plumbing drawings third, electrical and mechanical drawings fourth, and the
8
architectural drawings last. If the architectural drawings indicate a men’s room with water
closets in certain locations while the plumbing drawings indicate the water closets in other
locations, chances are the plumbing service and drain lines will be located as per the plumbing
drawings. Even though the architect is the project manager, he or she cannot assume that the
architectural drawings will govern during construction.
RediCheck is not intended to be a technical review. It should not replace or be confused

with single discipline technical reviews. Items such as the adequacy of structural members and
design calculations for HVAC equipment are not influenced by RediCheck. Single discipline
reviews are essential for assuring such technical accuracies. RediCheck is not intended to be a
safeguard against technical discipline errors or omissions, code violations, or inadequate site
investigations.
When proper interdisciplinary coordination occurs, everyone wins. Owners, contractors,

A/E liability insurance firms, and A/E's are all affected by a reduction of change orders, time
extensions, and liability claims. Suppose that in a set of drawings one detail indicates that the
exterior finish is to be brick and another detail indicates that it is to be wood siding. The
contractor may bid on the less expensive siding, install siding, and experience a delay while he
negotiates a change order for brick and tears out work in place. The owner may be involved
with a change order and liability determination, and may not be able to use the building at the
time he had planned, or may accept a building that has wood siding where he wanted brick.
The liability insurance company may pay a claim, a service for which A/E firms are paying
increasingly higher fees. The A/E may be liable for rework and time extension costs. In dealing
with such errors the A/E's work on other projects may be affected. Current design project time
schedules and deadlines are much easier to meet when work doesn't have to be interrupted to
"fight fires" such as change orders, telephone calls, letters of clarification, RFI’s, or redesign
9
work for a previous project. The entire problem could have been prevented with an effective
coordination check.
One place that monetary savings have been documented is in the U.S. Navy facilities
construction program. During fiscal years 1978 through 1986, approximately 50 percent of all
U.S. Navy change orders on construction projects were due to coordination errors and
omissions, with the rest primarily due to unforeseen site conditions and changes in owner
requirements. During those nine fiscal years, the U.S. Navy constructed approximately $14
billion worth of facilities, of which approximately $1 billion was change orders. This amounts to
an average change order rate of 7.4% of construction cost.
U.S. Navy Change Order Percentages

Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Work in Place ($M) Change Orders ($M) C/O Percent
78 828.0 57.7 7.0

79 963.1 98.9 10.3
80 1,116.4 89.3 8.0
81 1,039.5 93.7 9.0
82 1,214.4 99.8 8.0
83 1,902.9 133.2 7.0
84 2,060.8 151.2 7.3
85 2,427.3 168.0 6.9
86 2,472.8 142.0 5.7
10
Starting in fiscal year 1982, the RediCheck system was put into place for all major military
construction projects at the Officer in Charge of Construction (OICC) Trident, Naval Submarine
Base, Kings Bay, Georgia. Between fiscal years 1982 and 1985, twenty-nine projects with an
estimated construction cost in excess of $400 million were RediChecked. Cost of the RediCheck
services was approximately $500,000, 1/8 of 1 % of the estimated construction cost. During
fiscal years 1983 through 1986, the change order rate at the TRIDENT base was approximately
3% of all construction costs, the lowest rate of a major command in the Navy. During these
four years at Kings Bay, RediCheck appears to have saved 3 to 4% of the construction cost, for a
payback of approximately thirty to one.
OICC Trident Change Order Percentages

Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Work in Place ($M) Change Orders ($M) C/O Percent
78 102.4 7.6 7.4

79 74.2 8.7 11.7
80 45.6 4.8 10.5
81 27.6 2.4 8.7
82 26.0 2.6 10.0
83 51.0 1.3 2.5
84 62.6 2.3 3.5
85 114.1 3.8 3.3
86 165.4 4.3 2.6
11
Not all coordination errors can be eliminated by the use of RediCheck. There is no such
thing as a perfect set of contract documents. However, RediCheck is an approach that has
proven to be effective at cleansing contract documents of interdisciplinary coordination errors,
thereby reducing the largest single source of change orders, time extensions, and exposure to
liability claims. Most anyone who studies this book will be able to use the RediCheck system
during the preparation of plans and specifications and to perform required coordination
reviews. The system is structured and straightforward enough that even relatively
inexperienced design professionals can immediately uncover potentially disastrous
discrepancies.
12
CHAPTER 2
REDICHECK IN YOUR FIRM
Incorporating an interdisciplinary review such as RediCheck into a firm's routine is not

difficult but does require deliberate planning. During the preparation of plans and
specifications the project manager (PM) is the logical choice for ensuring quality control. Once
the preparation of plans and specifications has been completed, someone who is senior to the
project manager and has not been working on the project should supplement the project
manager as the quality assurance (QA) coordinator. This person should perform a RediCheck
spotcheck as described later in this chapter and decide whether a project is ready to be
advertised or should receive a complete RediCheck review.
Before the first line is drawn the project manager should establish concepts such as those
outlined in Chapter 12 of this manual, and should set aside specific blocks of time for
coordination meetings and final reviews. The coordination meetings should occur as early as
possible, such as at the 15% and 30% production stages. The final reviews, a spot check, and if
necessary, a complete review occur at the 100% construction document production stage.
The purpose of coordination meetings is to discuss items which impact interdisciplinary

coordination. The PM and a representative from each discipline should be present. Prior to the
meetings, each design team member should go over the portion of the RediCheck checklist that
pertains to his discipline, and be ready to inform the other team members of any change or
decision that will affect them. For example, if the mechanical engineer is planning to add heavy
roof top equipment, checklist item "1" under "Plan Check Mechanical and Plumbing" will tell
him that the structural engineer may be affected and should be notified. The reason for doing
this at a coordination meeting with all disciplines present is that if the structural engineer needs
to increase the depth of a beam to allow for the additional roof top equipment, other
disciplines involved with ceiling heights, light fixtures, and HVAC ducts may also be affected.
Having these meetings early in the production process results in advantages such as
willingness to change and cost effectiveness. When a coordination meeting is held at the 30%
construction document complete milestone, team members are about 85% willing to accept
ideas/revisions of others and will change their work. If a coordination meeting is held later
such as the 60% complete stage, only a 25% willingness to change surfaces as every discipline
has too much time invested in their documents to make changes. This relates to an interesting
concept called the "1-10-100-1000 Correction Factor". If the draftsman finds his own error it
can be corrected in one time unit. If the PM or QA coordinator finds the error it can be
corrected in ten time units. If the contractor finds the error then one hundred time units will
be expended to correct the discrepancy. And finally, if lawyers get involved it will take one
thousand time units. The earlier in the design process that coordination discrepancies are
located, the easier they are to solve.
13
Scheduling time for RediCheck may seem difficult, but the results are well worth the
effort. The time required is reminiscent of an oil filter commercial in which the garage owner
says "pay me now, or pay me later." Problems in contract documents do not go away. They will
eventually have to be solved.
Completion Time
The PM needs to make sure all RediCheck checklist items are coordinated no later than
the 60% complete production stage. During the preparation of plans and specifications each
member of the team should coordinate as he progresses through production, using the
RediCheck checklist as a guideline. Approximate percentage (%) milestone times for
completing coordination of each item are listed in Chapter 11. As each item in the checklist is
checked for coordination, the production personnel should either communicate the problem
with the other disciplines, or mark the item as being coordinated on the checklist. When
coordination discrepancies are found, all disciplines that the solution may affect must be
notified. Working in this manner, each discipline should complete the appropriate checklist by
the 60% contract document stage. The PM should see that this occurs.
14
RediCheck Schedule Milestones
When Item Who

Prior to Schedule Coordination
Preparation of Meetings and PM
Plans and Specs RediCheck Review
Use RediCheck Checklist as an
During Aid to the Preparation of Plans and Specs
Preparation of PM
Plans and Specs Hold Coordination Meetings Early
During Preparation of Plans and Specs
After Perform RediCheck Spot Check

Completion
of Plans If Spot Check Finds QA
If Spot Check Finds
and Specs Problems, Conduct
No Problems, Consider
RediCheck Review and
Advertising Early
Advertise on Schedule
After the project manager has overseen the use of RediCheck during the preparation of
plans and specifications, the quality assurance coordinator will use the time that the project
manager reserved for a complete review to perform a spot check and possibly a complete
review of the project. The spot check, requiring a few hours for most projects, is a means of
determining whether a complete review is necessary. A portion of the 80 RediCheck items
listed in Chapters 4 through 10 is used for the spot check. A good sampling for the spot check
would be the following 13 items:
Recommended RediCheck Spot Check
Chapter Discipline Items
4 Civil a, g
5 Structural b, c, d
6 Architectural e, k
7 Mechanical/Plumbing a, h, c
8 Electrical a, c
10 Specifications b
If all 13 items are coordinated, there is an excellent chance that all remaining 67 items in
the RediCheck list are coordinated and that the project is in good shape. At this point you may
decide not to have a complete RediCheck review and will be able to advertise the project early.
On the other hand, if 5 of the 13 items contain coordination problems, then the project is in
15
trouble and the previously scheduled complete quality assurance RediCheck review should be
accomplished.
It is important that the spot check review does occur, no matter when the design
documents are completed. What often happens is that with a deadline of June 20 for a project,
drawings are completed on June 19. The result is that the drawings are consolidated at the last
minute and no final coordination review occurs at all. A construction project will not be
completed sooner by putting it out for bid without a final review. It is far better to delay
advertising and delay the bid opening a few days or weeks than to award a construction
contract with coordination errors that could cause weeks or months of construction delay.
The amount of time to schedule for a complete RediCheck review is dependent upon the
size and complexity of the project, the drawing size, and the number of people performing the
review. A typical project of average complexity requires 51 minutes per sheet for a RediCheck
review. This is based on an average sheet size of 30" x 42" and one person performing the
review. The following table is helpful in estimating the review time in minutes/sheet.
Estimated Minutes/Drawing for RediCheck Review
Drawing Size 24x36 30x42 36x48
Minutes/Drawing 35 51 70
Simple projects such as a low rise housing complex may average 30 minutes per sheet.
Complex projects such as hospitals will usually require one hour per sheet. Adjust the matrix by
reducing or increasing the time by as much as 33% for simple or complex projects. If more than
one person is performing the RediCheck review, add 5% to the total review time for each
additional person.
For example, one person checking a project of average complexity, with 30" x 42" sheets,
and 50 drawings would result in a time budget of 51 minutes times 50 drawings, totaling 42.5
man hours. If the project were of simple complexity, the average complexity time estimate
would be multiplied by 67%, totaling 28 man hours. A complex project with a team of six
reviewers would require the average complexity estimate to be multiplied by 133%, for a
subtotal of 56.5 man hours, plus 5% of the total time for each additional reviewer (5 times 5%
or 25%) for a total of 71 man hours.
16
51 MINUTES / SHEET
5 ERRORS / SHEET
During a final review it is important to keep the number of RediCheck reviewers to an

absolute minimum. For most projects under $10 million construction cost, using only one
person for the entire final review is ideal. Such a review can normally be accomplished within
one week. With one person checking all disciplines, interdisciplinary coordination errors are
easily found. On the other hand, if several people are involved, omissions and duplication of
efforts are likely to occur. On larger projects time constraints will force a team approach. One
word of warning with the team approach - with a team of different disciplines it is very easy for
everyone to concentrate on his own discipline and primarily look at technical aspects. If this
happens the interdisciplinary review will probably fail. The smaller the number of RediCheck
reviewers the better.
There are several items which influence the decision to have a final RediCheck review
done in-house or externally. Does the firm have an in-house QA coordinator who is trained in
the area of interdisciplinary coordination and who can perform the spot check? Will in-house
personnel who did not design the project be available to review a project at the 100% design
stage if the QA spot check reveals problems? Is cost a critical factor? An external review will
probably be more expensive than an in-house review. When a firm initially incorporates a final
interdisciplinary review into its quality control program, external reviews by people
experienced in RediCheck would help the firm to see exactly how the system can be used,
giving a clearer picture of what to aim for in in-house reviews.
If the decision is made to have the final interdisciplinary review accomplished externally,
further options exist. A reciprocal arrangement with another firm for project peer review, in
which each firm agrees to check the other firm's work is a possibility. Hiring an outside firm
that specializes in quality control reviews may be desirable. External reviewers have the
advantage of being able to see things that people who have previous familiarity with the
project are not likely to notice. The disadvantages of external reviews are that they must be
17
scheduled with another firm and that the review may be more expensive than if it were
accomplished in-house.
If an in-house final review is chosen, people in the firm who have not worked on the
documents should perform the review. Someone who has been working on the project for a
few months and hasn't spotted the problem probably will not be able to during a final review.
Also, human nature being what it is, most professionals have a tough time trying to find errors
in their own work. It is a lot easier and more fun to find errors in someone else's work rather
than in your own.
One large government agency set up an interesting team approach for final quality
assurance (QA) checking. A rotating QA team with staggered temporary assignments was
established. They circulated a notice to all production employees with certain minimum
experience levels, offering a place on the QA team for a temporary assignment with minimum
increased pay. As a result, a large number of employees were interested. After the first QA
team was established and trained, additional members were rotated into the team as members
graduated every four months. Records were kept of avoided change orders, number of sheets
checked, number of hours spent checking, and estimated dollar amount of avoided change
orders. The first four-person in-house team saved over $700,000 in avoidable change orders,
for an estimated savings of over $1,300 for every hour of RediCheck review. As personnel
became more familiar with interdisciplinary coordination review concepts and a documentation
of savings was developed, a pride in quality construction documents soon spread throughout
the organization.
18
CHAPTER 3
PERFORMING THE
REDICHECK REVIEW
The first step is to obtain all the electronic files for the project. We ask for combined PDF
files of the drawings and specifications (separated by volume if the project is large). In addition,
it is helpful to have the files in “text-readable” format to facilitate searching.
There are several different ways that the drawings can be reviewed – electronically
and/or using printed drawings. There are advantages and disadvantages to either method, but
the end result is what is important – thoroughly reviewed and coordinated documents. We
have found that our team is more efficient working with printed drawings for most aspects of
the review. Before printing, we look at the most complex drawings such as electrical power or
mechanical HVAC plans to determine the smallest size we can print and still read the
documents. This will result in the minimum print cost and increase efficiency during the review.
Helpful Abbreviations/Conventions
Red Star Significant Item
AVW At Variance With
IR Incorrect Reference
CNL Could Not Locate
19
When overlaying documents, we recommend electronic overlays be used. The drawings

can be re-sized and rotated if necessary. Different colors are used to easily identify
discrepancies. The overlays can be saved with comments to clearly show any discrepancies
found. Here is an example:
Sample Electronic Overlay
The specifications should be reviewed electronically with a PDF markup tool such as
Adobe Acrobat or Bluebeam Revu. Comments from a distributed team of reviewers can easily
be imported, or updated in real time, depending on the needs of the design team.
Using the RediCheck checklist in Chapter 11, each item will be marked on the drawings
or specifications as it is checked. Correct items will be highlighted in yellow, and errors will be
circled and noted in red. The checklist consists of directions such as:
b. Column locations are the same on structural and architectural.
In this case the reviewer would overlay appropriate structural and architectural drawings,
locate each column on both sheets, and highlight them in yellow on both sheets if the same
location is indicated, or if the locations do not match, circle each column in red and write a note
on the architectural sheet, "column location at variance with sheet S-4" and also write a note
on the structural sheet, "column location at variance with sheet A-7." "At variance with" is used
so much that it is expedient to abbreviate it "AVW".
One word of caution: an independent RediCheck reviewer should not provide direction as
to how to correct an item. For example, if during a review it is discovered that column B3 on
sheet S4 is not located in the same location as on architectural sheet A7, do not make an
attempt to indicate the correct column location. If you do provide direction and you are wrong
you may incur liability for your action. Handle the discrepancy by noting that both column
20
locations are "at variance with" each other, and then leave it to the designer of record to make
the decision as to which is correct and what the impact may be on the rest of the contract
documents.
When omissions, design busts, or code violations are found, it is best to ask questions
such as "Have you considered a waterproof membrane for the plaza deck?" or "Does PVC piping
meet code requirements?"
Here are some sample drawings with RediCheck Review comments:
Sample Civil Drawing
Sample Architectural Drawing
21
Sample Mechanical Drawing
Sample Plumbing Drawing
22
Sample Electrical Drawing
When the review has been completed, the review project leader needs to combine all
comments into the master reviewed documents. If drawings/specs are electronically reviewed,
this will involve importing comments, and quickly checking that duplicate or conflicting
comments are removed. Any transfer comments from different reviewers need to be
combined on printed documents, and it is recommended that the drawings be color scanned.
The scans can be distributed to the design team via FTP upload/download.
23
To ensure that all comments have been addressed, we recommend each person on the
design team follow this process:
A. Use PDF markup software such as Adobe Reader, Adobe Acrobat, or Bluebeam to
comment on the reviewed documents
B. For all red-marked comments, do one of the following:
Agree with the comment and revision made

Place green rectangle (Rectangle Tool, 30% opacity) over the comment
Explanation, coordination required, or disagree with comment

Place a red text box (Text Box Tool, 30% opacity) near the comment.
C. When all comments have been addressed, select the Comments menu, “Export
Comments to Data File” and save the file. E-Mail your comments (via the data file) to
the project manager who is compiling all responses.
D. Comments can be imported into the Master Files by selecting the Comments menu,
“Import Comments”.
24
PART B
INTERDISCIPLINARY CHECKLISTS
Chapter 4 – Civil/Landscape Interdisciplinary Checklist ....................................... 26
Chapter 5 – Structural Interdisciplinary Checklist ................................................ 28
Chapter 6 – Architectural Interdisciplinary Checklist ........................................... 31
Chapter 7 – Mechanical/Plumbing Interdisciplinary Checklist ............................. 34
Chapter 8 – Electrical Interdisciplinary Checklist.................................................. 38
Chapter 9 – Food Service Interdisciplinary Checklist ............................................ 41
Chapter 10 – Specifications Checklist ................................................................... 42
Chapter 11 – Consolidated RediCheck Checklist .................................................. 45
NOTE
The use of the RediCheck system as part of an A/E's quality assurance program
helps meet government selection criteria for agencies including the U.S. Navy,
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Postal Service, and the National Park
Service.
25
CHAPTER 4
CIVIL
INTERDISCIPLINARY CHECKLIST
Preliminary Review
Quickly glance over all sheets, spending no more than one minute per sheet to
become familiar with the project.
Plan Check Civil
a. Verify that new underground utilities (power, telephone, water, sewer, gas, storm
drainage, fuel lines, grease traps, fuel tanks) have no interferences. Overlay all
discipline site plans with civil. Common discrepancies include power and telephone
poles directly above storm sewer lines, electrical substations not coordinated with
other disciplines, and landscape drawings indicating plants and trees directly above
underground utilities such as electrical conduits, duct banks, sewer lines, or
manholes.
b. Verify that existing power/telephone poles, pole guys, street signs, drainage inlets,
valve boxes, manhole covers, etc., do not interfere with new driveways, sidewalks,
or other site improvements. Overlay other discipline site plans with civil. In
addition, check that existing utility lines, fences, and other obstructions to new
construction are clearly identified so there is no confusion as to what is existing
26
versus new construction. Check that existing utility lines to be preserved,

maintained, abandoned in place, or removed following a particular construction
phase are clearly indicated.
c. Verify that limits of construction, clearing, grading, sodding, grass or mulch are
shown and are consistent in other disciplines. These limits should be consistent on
all discipline site plans. Common discrepancies include site plans not taking into
consideration underground utility connections to existing services that will increase
the limits of construction, clearing, grading, sodding, grass or mulch.
d. Verify that fire hydrants and street light poles do not conflict with other above
ground items. Overlay all discipline site plans. Common discrepancies are to have
landscape drawings indicate plants and trees that interfere with the light poles or
hydrants, or landscaping indicated to be planted in swales or drainage ditches.
e. Verify that profile sheets show other underground utilities and avoid conflicts.
Identify utilities that cross each other on the civil plan sheets, then check the profile
sheets to insure that utility crossings match the plans. Check that underground
utilities are shown at respective elevations on the profile sheets so that conflicts can
be identified. A common discrepancy is to have storm lines at the same elevation as
another underground utility such as water, power, communication, or gas lines.
Verify that existing utility locations are specifically noted as approximate subject to
field verification.
f. Verify that horizontal distances between drainage structures and manholes match
scaled dimensions and stated dimensions on both plan and profile sheets.
g. Verify that building footprint and finished floor elevations match other disciplines.
Verify finished floor elevations match between civil and other discipline floor plans.
Check that the building footprint and other site improvements match other
discipline site plans. Check that the finished grade slopes away from the building.
27
CHAPTER 5
STRUCTURAL
INTERDISCPLINARY CHECKLIST
1. Preliminary Review
2. Plan Check Structural
a. Verify that column grid lines on structural and architectural match. Make an overlay
between the structural foundation plan and the ground floor architectural plan.
Then make overlays between the structural foundation plan and structural floor
framing plans. Verify that footings are within property lines.
b. Verify that column locations are the same on structural and architectural. While
making the overlays in item "a." above, check that column locations match.
c. Verify that perimeter slab on structural matches architectural. Overlay structural

and corresponding architectural floor plans for consistent edge of slab dimensions.
Especially look for recesses and protrusions that don't match.
28
d. Verify that depressed or raised slabs are indicated and match architectural. Locate
depressed or raised slabs by checking the architectural finish schedule for floor
materials such as quarry tile, ceramic tile, and raised computer access floors. Then
check the perimeter of the depressed or raised slab on the architectural floor plans.
Finally, overlay the structural and architectural floor plans and check that the areas
for floor depressions or raised slabs match.
e. Verify that slab elevations match architectural. Check that slab elevations are the
same on architectural and structural plans and sections.
f. Verify that foundation piers are identified and sized on a schedule or plan. Locate
foundation piers on structural plans and check that each pier is on a schedule. Each
pier is usually identified by a letter/number symbol such as "F-1". Look for symbol
omissions and obvious typos.
g. Verify that foundation beams are identified and sized on a schedule or plan. Locate
beams on foundation plans and check that each beam is on a schedule. Each
foundation beam is usually identified by a letter/number symbol such as "B-1". Look
for symbol omissions and obvious typos.
h. Verify that locations of roof framing plan column lines and columns match
foundation plan column lines and columns. Overlay the structural roof framing plan
with the foundation plan.
i. Verify that structural perimeter roof line matches architectural roof plan. Overlay
architectural roof plans with structural roof framing plans. Make sure the structural
framing plan is adjusted for unusual architectural features such as concealed gutters
or skylights. Check if roof slopes on structural match architectural roof plan slopes.
j. Verify that columns, floor beams, and roof beams are listed in column and beam
schedules. Locate each column and beam on plans and check for each on a
schedule. Look for omissions and typos. Often a column or beam shown on a plan is
inadvertently not listed on a schedule.
k. Verify that length of columns in column schedule matches the length shown in
sections and elevations shown on plans. Check that schedule lengths match
architectural and structural floor plans and sections.
l. Verify that sections are properly labeled. Check that section labels are complete and
refer to the proper sheet and section or detail number.
m. Verify that expansion joint locations match other disciplines. Overlay all discipline
floor plans to check locations of expansion joints. Check that expansion joints are
uninterrupted throughout the entire building including floor, interior and exterior
wall, ceiling, and roof materials on other discipline drawings. Verify that
29
architectural building elevations and mechanical and electrical drawings indicate and
match locations of expansion joints.
n. Verify that dimensions match architectural. Overlay structural and architectural

floor plans and verify dimensions such as overall building dimensions, and
dimensions where concrete is indicated such as elevator shafts. Concrete is so
expensive to remove when in the wrong location that extra care should be taken to
ensure that dimensions are coordinated with the architectural floor plans.
o. Verify that drawing notes do not conflict with specifications. Very often a structural
engineer will list a large number of general notes at the beginning of the structural
drawings. These notes indicate items such as the strength of concrete, the class of
steel, and compaction requirements. Most if not all of the notes tend to repeat
information that is in the specifications. Whenever information is repeated there is
always the chance for error when a design change occurs. Recommend that
duplicate notes in the specifications and drawings be deleted from either location.
p. Verify that openings or penetrations for stairs, elevators, ducts, conduits, and chases
match other disciplines. Overlay structural framing plans with architectural,
mechanical, electrical, and plumbing drawings for floor openings. Check structural
shear wall elevations for vertical openings against architectural and mechanical
HVAC plans.
30
CHAPTER 6
ARCHITECTURAL
2. Plan Check Architectural
a. Verify that property line dimensions on surveyor civil site plans match architectural.
Overlay the surveyor civil site plans with the architectural site plans and ensure
overall dimensions are the same.
b. Verify that building is located behind set-back lines. Location of set-back lines on
survey site plans should be outside of the building as positioned on the civil or
architectural site plans. Ensure that building location is clearly defined and
coordinated with civil site plans.
c. Verify that overall building dimensions and locations of columns and bearing walls
match structural. Verify that architectural overall building dimensions and elevator
and stair core dimensions match structural. Using overlays make sure all column
and bearing wall locations are identical on architectural and structural plans.
31
d. Verify that existing and new work is clearly identified on site plans. Existing and new
work should be identified in legends.
e. Verify that building elevations match floor plans. In particular, check roof lines,
window and door openings, louver openings, exterior light fixtures, and expansion
joints. If the floor plans are not the same scale as the elevations, electronic overlays
with scale adjustments can be helpful. Also overlay architectural elevations with
mechanical plans to verify location and size of wall louvers, and electrical lighting
plans to verify location and mounting height of exterior fixtures.
f. Verify that building sections match elevations and plans. Check roof lines, windows
and door locations.
g. Verify that wall sections match architectural and structural building sections. Pay
particular attention to top of slab elevations, width and depths of beams, and
concrete slab thicknesses.
h. Verify size of openings for windows and doors. Verify that window glass types
match specifications. Size of openings on the window and door schedules should
match the architectural and structural floor plans. Make sure there is a shim space
to allow for irregularities so the windows and doors will fit. Check drawings for glass
types that may be different from specifications. Verify that structural X-bracing does
not conflict with window or door openings.
i. Verify expansion joints are continuous throughout the building. Check that
expansion joints on architectural plans, sections, details, and elevations are
uninterrupted throughout the entire building including floor, interior and exterior
walls, ceiling and roof materials.
J. Verify that large scale partial floor plans match small scale floor plans. Do not repeat
dimensions, door and room numbers, and other information unnecessarily.
k. Verify that reflected ceiling plans match architectural floor plans to ensure no
variance with wall locations. Verify that location of electrical fixtures and
mechanical registers/diffusers on electrical and mechanical plans doesn't contradict
the location on reflected ceiling plans. - Use overlays to check reflected ceiling plans
with floor plans and again to check light fixture layouts against electrical light plans,
and ceiling diffusers/registers and vents against mechanical HVAC plans.
l. Verify that room finish schedule information matches plan and elevation
information; including room numbers, names of rooms, finishes, and ceiling heights.
Look for omissions and inconsistencies. First look at the schedule for obvious
omissions by checking that all boxes are filled in. Second, look at the schedule for
inconsistencies. For example, if all toilets have ceramic tile walls and floors and a
gypsum board ceiling, and suddenly a toilet is in the schedule with carpeting and an
32
acoustical tile ceiling, chances are that it is wrong. It is much easier to check similar
rooms as a group than to check each individual room in sequence as on the
schedule. For example, check all toilets at once, then all office spaces, all corridors,
all mechanical rooms, etc. Third, compare the room finish schedule with the plan
and elevation sheets to match room numbers, names of rooms, finishes, and ceiling
heights; and to ensure that all rooms are on the schedule.
m. Verify that door schedule information matches plan, and elevation information;
including sizes, types, labels, etc. Look for omissions and inconsistencies. Similar to
the room finish example above, first look at the schedule for obvious omissions by
checking that all boxes are filled in. Second, look for inconsistencies. For example, if
all except one door along a certain corridor are fire rated there is probably an error.
It is easier to check similar doors as a group than to check each individual door in the
sequence on the schedule. For example, check aluminum storefront doors at once,
then steel doors, then hollow core wood doors, then solid core doors, and then fire
rated doors. Check mechanical HVAC floor plans to locate doors that need to be
indicated on the door schedule as requiring louvers, or to be undercut. Third,
compare the door schedule with plan and elevation sheets to make sure all doors
are on the schedule. Fourth, verify hardware sets on schedule match specifications.
n. Verify that the location of fire rated walls matches the location of fire and/or smoke
dampers on mechanical plans. The fire rated walls will usually appear on the
architectural floor plans and/or reflected ceiling plans. Verify that the wall ratings
have no gaps. Overlay the architectural floor plans with the mechanical HVAC
ductwork drawings. Verify that the mechanical drawings indicate fire and/or smoke
dampers at the rated walls.
o. Verify that cabinets will fit in available space and that electrical outlets on cabinet
walls are at the right height. Check cabinetry plan measurements against small scale
architectural floor plans. Can the cabinets be brought into the rooms once the walls
are in place? Due to slight variances in construction it is advisable for the plans
and/or specifications to require the contractor to make field measurements before
beginning cabinet fabrication. Check that electrical power drawings indicate outlets
above cabinet counter tops.
p. Verify that the locations of flag poles, dumpster pads, generator pads, transformers,
cooling towers, vaults, and landscaping have been coordinated with other discipline
site plans. Look for conflicts between flag poles and underground utilities, and for
landscaping conflicts such as trees that will interfere with above ground features
such as parking lot lights or below ground utilities such as sewer lines.
33
CHAPTER 7
MECHANICAL/PLUMBING
This is
ridiculous!
2. Plan Check Mechanical and Plumbing
a. Verify that plumbing floor plans match architectural floor plans. Overlay plumbing
floor plans with corresponding architectural floor plans and look for floor plan wall
location inconsistencies.
b. Verify that new gas, water, sewer, etc. lines connect to existing or new utilities on
civil drawings. Compare civil site plans and plumbing floor plans to look for utility
line size discrepancies and inconsistent alignment connection point locations.
Plumbing plans typically connect with civil utilities five feet beyond the building
perimeter. Verify invert elevations between plumbing and civil drawings.
c. Verify that plumbing fixtures match plumbing schedules and architectural locations.
Most plumbing drawings have a fixture schedule that identifies each fixture such as
a water closet, handicap water closet, drinking fountain, etc. Verify fixture
designations match fixture schedule and/or specifications. Overlay plumbing plans
34
with architectural plans to check that fixture locations and types match.
Inconsistencies with handicap fixtures and drinking fountains are common.
d. Verify that roof drain locations and roof slopes match architectural roof plan.
Overlay plumbing, and architectural roof plans to check that roof drain locations and
roof slopes are identical. Overlay plumbing and structural plans to check that roof
drains are not directly on top of roof beams.
e. Verify that pipes are sized sensibly and that drains are connected and do not
interfere with foundations. Pipe sizes should increase as additional lines join. Be
concerned when a 6" pipe increases to 10" pipe and then decreases to an 8" pipe.
When checking for foundation interference check the structural drawings for
elevations of footings and compare with inverts indicated on plumbing drawings.
Pay particular attention to roof drains next to columns and to plumbing lines
crossing footings.
f. Verify that wall chases are provided on architectural to conceal vertical piping.
Wherever there are waste and vent lines there will probably be the need for a chase.
Check that structural drawings do not indicate columns that will be inside chase
walls where they will obstruct the installation of horizontal piping and vents.
g. Verify that plumbing fixtures and vertical riser pipe sizes match riser diagrams.
Check that fixtures are connected by comparing the plumbing floor plans with the
plumbing riser diagrams.
h. Verify that HVAC floor plans match architectural. Overlay plans and verify that walls
and door openings occur at the same locations.
i. Verify that sprinkler heads do not interfere with other ceiling items. In those areas
to be protected by sprinklers ensure that the sprinklers will not interfere with light
fixtures, ceiling registers, soffits, and/or beams.
j. Verify that mechanical/plumbing ducts and pipes do not conflict with architectural
features or structural members. Look for unusual conditions on architectural
sections that may reduce available space. For example, if there is a large folding
partition supported by a steel beam, make sure there is adequate space above the
partition support for HVAC ductwork to pass beneath the main structure of the
building.
k. Verify that adequate ceiling height exists at worst case duct intersection or largest
beam. Look for the depth of the two biggest ducts that cross or for the largest duct
that passes under a beam. Check the architectural finish schedule to determine the
finish ceiling height in the space. Check the structural drawings to determine the
clear space between the bottom of the structure and the finish ceiling height. Don't
forget to add the depth of fire proofing. Check the specifications for thickness of
35
insulation for HVAC ductwork. Check the electrical drawings for depth of recessed
light fixtures. Check the architectural ceiling details to determine the thickness of
the ceiling. Check the plumbing drawings for plumbing lines that may be in the area.
If the building is in a seismic area there may be braces to consider. Add up all the
actual depth dimensions plus minimum installation clearance space, and determine
if the finish ceiling height is possible.
l. Verify that structural supports required for mechanical equipment are indicated on
structural drawings. Pay particular attention to roof mounted equipment. Overlay
mechanical and structural plans to determine that roof supports have been provided
for the mechanical equipment. Beneath heavy mechanical equipment look for
increased beam sizes and/or closer spacing of beams on structural drawings. Check
that structural floor and wall supports indicated on mechanical drawings exist on
structural drawings. Check structural drawings for lintels over duct/louver wall
openings.
36
m. Verify that smoke and fire dampers are indicated at smoke and fire walls. Overlay
architectural plans that identify the smoke and fire walls with the mechanical HVAC
ductwork plans to ensure that dampers are located at smoke and fire rated walls.
n. Verify that diffuser locations match architectural reflected ceiling plans. Overlay
HVAC sheets and architectural reflected ceiling plans to look for conflicts with lights,
sprinkler heads, dropped soffits, and skylights.
o. Verify that openings for roof penetrations (ducts, fans, etc.) are indicated on
structural roof plans. Overlay structural roof framing plans with the mechanical
HVAC ductwork plans and check that roof openings and additional framing supports
around the openings have been provided.
p. Verify that ductwork is sized logically. Check that ductwork sizes are indicated and
that the sizes appear to make sense. For example, if an 18" x 30" supply duct leaves
an air handling unit and then suddenly becomes 26" x 30", there is a discrepancy.
Main line duct sizes should increase as they near an air handling unit.
q. Verify that key notes are referenced. If there are 10 key notes, check that all 10 are
referenced in the drawings. If a note indicates to see sheet M-15 for additional
details, check that the details are on sheet M-15. Avoid duplicating the same notes
in drawings and specifications.
r. Verify that air conditioning units, heaters, and exhaust fans match architectural roof
plan locations. Overlay mechanical/plumbing plans with architectural roof plans to
check locations of equipment. Check that roof walkway pads are provided for
maintenance personnel.
s. Verify that mechanical equipment will fit in spaces allocated and that there is room
for maintenance such as removing filters or tubes.
t. Verify that horsepower ratings, phases, and voltages of major items of equipment
on mechanical and electrical drawings and specifications match. Check mechanical
schedules, electrical riser diagrams and/or panel schedules, and specifications
against each other.
u. Verify that thermostat locations have been coordinated with architectural drawings.
Check architectural floor plans to avoid thermostats behind doors, chalkboards,
bulletin boards, artwork, etc.
37
CHAPTER 8
ELECTRICAL
2. Plan Check Electrical
a. Verify that electrical floor plans match architectural and mechanical. Check that the
location of floor mounted equipment is consistent between disciplines. Overlay the
architectural floor plans with the electrical power and HVAC floor plans to make sure
that wall locations and door swings are the same. If the door swings don't match
there may be light switches located on the wrong side of the door or behind door
swings. Check the architectural, mechanical, and electrical plans for matching
location of pumps, compressors, air handling units, and other equipment.
b. Verify that the location of light fixtures matches architectural reflected ceiling plans
and that light fixtures do not conflict with the structure or mechanical HVAC system.
Overlay electrical light plans with architectural reflected ceiling plans and check for
conflicts with columns, ceiling diffusers, ceiling grids, skylights, expansion joints,
drapery or folding partition tracks, sprinklers, and/or soffits. Make sure that
recessed or surface mounted light fixtures are suitable for the ceiling. A common
38
discrepancy is to inadvertently indicate a surface mounted fixture for an acoustical

tile ceiling where a recessed fixture was desired. Overlay electrical light plans with
structural and mechanical plans to locate possible areas of conflict with recessed
lights, structure, and ducts. Check that sizes and types of light fixtures are the same
in the specifications and drawing schedules.
c. Verify that major pieces of equipment have electrical connections and horsepower
ratings, phases, and voltages are consistent with other discipline schedules. Check
mechanical, plumbing, and food service schedules for major pieces of equipment
that require electrical service and verify that these pieces of equipment are included
in electrical line diagrams, power plans, and/or panel schedules. Check horsepower
ratings, voltages, and phases for inconsistencies on mechanical schedule sheets,
electrical power plans and riser diagrams, and specifications.
d. Verify that locations of panel boards are consistent with architectural, mechanical,
and plumbing floor plans and that the panel boards are indicated on the electrical
riser diagram. Overlay the electrical power plans with architectural floor plans to
find conflicts in the location of the panel boards. Check for the same number and
designation of electrical panels on the electrical plans and riser diagram. Check that
voltages for panels on the riser diagram match voltages on the panel board
schedules.
e. Verify that key notes are referenced. If there are 10 key notes, check that all 10 are
referenced in the drawings. If a note indicates to see sheet E-11 for additional
details, check that the details are on sheet E-11. Avoid duplicating the same notes in
the drawings and specifications.
f. Verify that locations of electrical conduit runs, floor trenches, and openings are
coordinated with structural plans. Overlay electrical and structural floor plans.
Check that major conduit runs, floor trenches, and openings are shown the same on
structural.
g. Verify that electrical panels are not recessed in fire rated walls. Overlay electrical
power plans with architectural plans to determine the location of fire rated walls.
Check that electrical panels are not recessed in these walls. Usually recessing
anything in a fire rated wall will destroy the fire rating of the wall. If electric panels
have to be recessed along a fire rated wall, check that the wall will be modified to
remain rated. Often additional layers of fire rated gypsum board will be required
behind the panel.
h. Verify that exterior electrical equipment locations are coordinated with site paving,
grading, and landscaping. Overlay electrical site plans and check that locations for
substations, transformers, generators, underground conduit and duct banks do not
conflict with civil, architectural, and landscape site plans. Check that electrical
39
service is provided for motorized sprinkler valves, pools, and fountains on landscape
drawings and/or exterior lighted building signs.
i. Verify that structural supports are provided for roof top electrical equipment.
Overlay the electrical plans with the structural plans to locate the electrical
equipment and corresponding increased beam sizes and/or closer spacing of beams
on structural drawings.
40
CHAPTER 9
FOOD SERVICE
2. Plan Check Food Service
a. Verify that the equipment layout matches other discipline floor plans and that there
are no conflicts with columns. With overlays, compare food service plans with
architectural, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical plans to make sure the
equipment layout is the same. Check that the location of columns on structural
plans does not interfere with the equipment.
b. Verify that equipment is connected to utility systems. Check that water service
lines, steam lines, drain lines, gas lines, electrical service, and exhaust and make-up
hoods connect to utility systems on electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and civil plans.
c. Verify that food service equipment as shown on the drawings match food service
floor plans and specifications. Check food service equipment item numbers,
quantities, manufacturer names and model numbers between the drawings and
specifications.
d. Verify that floor depressions and floor troughs are coordinated with other
disciplines. Check architectural and structural plans to verify locations and depths of
depressions at coolers/freezers and locations and sizes of floor troughs.
41
CHAPTER 10
SPECIFICATIONS CHECKLIST
So far the need to check the coordination of drawings has been stressed, and
specifications have been neglected. Experience with hundreds of construction contracts and
thousands of change orders indicates that coordination errors are predominately in the
drawings, rather than the specifications. This does not mean that change orders are never due
to problems with the specifications, but that the largest interdisciplinary coordination payoff is
likely to occur in the drawings.
Some reasons for fewer problems with the specifications are: more experienced people
write the specifications than typically work on the drawings; most specifications are "type" or
"guide" specifications that are tried and true; and during the bidding period material suppliers
tend to notify the architect or owner when there is a problem with the material specified. The
specifications tend to be self-cleansing during the bidding stage while there is often time to
issue an addendum to solve specification problems. On the other hand, coordination problems
with the drawings usually don't surface until after the construction contract award, and then
result in change orders.
The impression that the specifications are not important or that change orders are never
experienced due to coordination problems with the specifications is erroneous. The following
specification items historically have created change orders and should be verified:
a. Check that Alternates or Bid Items explicitly state what is intended. Are they
coordinated with the drawings? If there are insufficient funds to award the contract
on the base bid plus all bid items then problems can occur. For example, consider a
42
situation such as a project with an additive alternate bid item number 4 identified as
"landscaping". The landscaping drawings for this project contain an underground
irrigation system. When the bids come in there are insufficient funds to pick up
alternate number 4. The intent of the A/E is that the underground irrigation system
is part of the base bid and not part of alternate number 4. However, the contractor
interprets the underground irrigation system as part of the landscaping since it was
in the landscape drawings. A dispute such as this will usually be resolved in favor of
any reasonable interpretation and the contractor will likely win the claim, regardless
of what the specification writer may have intended. This could have been avoided if
alternate number 4 indicated "all work indicated on the landscape drawings except
the underground irrigation system which is part of the base bid".
b. Check specifications for phasing of construction. Are the phases clear? Anything
that impacts on the contractor's freedom to schedule the work should be clear. For
example, if the contractor has a project to provide an asphalt overlay to an existing
parking lot that serves several large retail stores, it may not be possible to close the
entire parking lot at one time for the work to be performed. If this is the case the
specifications should be very specific about phasing of the work. Mobilization and
de-mobilization by a contractor is costly if not precisely specified. This point was
made during the construction of a new commissary (military food store) on the west
coast. In the contract the contractor was required to remove the existing
refrigeration equipment from the old commissary and build the new commissary in
a separate building. The specifications indicated that the contractor would retain
title to the old refrigeration equipment once removed and that he was required to
give the government 15 days written notice before beginning removal of the
equipment. At the preconstruction conference Mr. Reefer (not the contractor's real
name) handed the government representative a letter indicating that he intended to
start removing the old refrigeration equipment in 15 days. Because there was only
one commissary on the base, Mr. Reefer was directed not to remove the equipment
until the new commissary was completed. Mr. Reefer immediately indicated that
this was not in compliance with the contract and that he had a claim for additional
costs against the government. Unfortunately the specifications did not indicate that
the new commissary was to be completed before the old one was put out of
operation. A year and a half later the government was forced to begin additional
cost negotiations with Mr. Reefer. The negotiations considered equivalent rental
costs for the year and a half as well as depreciation charges as the equipment was
not worth as much a year and a half later as it had been at the beginning of the
contract. This omission in the specifications was a $200,000.00 change order in Mr.
Reefer's pocket. The specifications should have indicated phase one as "completion
of the new commissary", "then the contractor will give the government 15 days
notification before beginning phase two", which is "removal of the old commissary
refrigeration equipment" .
43
c. Compare architectural finish schedule to specification index. Ensure all finish

materials are specified. This is a simple cross check that often yields dividends. By
checking all of the floor, wall, and ceiling materials on the finish schedule against the
specification index you will often discover a material that is on the schedule but not
specified. Mr. Reefer was very good at being the low bidder on government
contracts because he was able to find these types of inconsistencies. On another
contract with Mr. Reefer, a finish schedule indicated walnut paneling for a
Commanding Officer's office. There were no details of the paneling in the drawings,
and unfortunately the walnut paneling was not specified. Mr. Reefer submitted for
approval imitation walnut paneling 1/64th of an inch thick. With no specification to
cover the quality of the material the government was forced to issue a request for
proposal for the additional cost between what Mr. Reefer had submitted and what
was really wanted, 3/4" walnut veneer plywood paneling.
d. Check major items of equipment and verify that they are coordinated with contract
drawings. Pay particular attention to horsepower ratings and voltage requirements.
If quantities of equipment, horsepower ratings, voltages, and phases are indicated
on schedules in the drawings, they should not be repeated in the specifications. If
they are repeated, make sure they are the same.
e. Verify that those items specified "as indicated" or "where indicated" in the
specifications are in fact indicated on contract drawings. The courts have ruled
many times that items specified "as indicated" or "where indicated" and not shown
on the drawings make it impossible for the contractor to bid since he doesn't know
the installation location. Under these circumstances the contractor is relieved of the
requirement. Avoid this pitfall by ensuring items specified "as indicated" or "where
indicated" are shown on both the drawings and the specifications.
f. Verify that the index and sections contained in the body of the specifications match.
Check that all specification sections in the body of the specification are indexed.
Also rapidly glance through all specification pages and look for references to other
specification sections. Verify that these references are in the specification index.
Often references are to "phantom" sections that don't exist.
g. Verify thickness of materials or quantities of materials in specifications. These items

are often best shown on the drawings and should not be repeated in the
specifications. For example, it is a good idea to avoid indicating the thickness of
drywall or gypsum wallboard in the specifications if it is already indicated on
architectural sections and details. Another example concerns food service
equipment. Very often the food service equipment specifications will list the
number of deep fat fryers and other equipment, and at the same time the food
service drawings will have a schedule that includes the same information. It is best
not to repeat information that will increase the opportunity for contradictions.
44
CHAPTER 11
CONSOLIDATED
REDICHECK CHECKLIST
Project Title ___________________________________________ Project No. __________________________
Reviewer’s Signature ____________________________________ Date _______________________________
Preliminary Review
a. Quickly glance over all sheets, spending no more than one minute per sheet to become familiar with
the project.
Civil – Verify that: Coordinated

Yes No N/A %
a. New underground utilities (power, telephone, water, sewer, gas, storm drainage,
30
fuel lines, grease traps, fuel tanks) have no interferences.
b. Existing power/telephone poles, pole guys, street signs, drainage inlets, valve
15
boxes, manhole covers, etc., do not interfere with the new driveways, sidewalks, or
other site improvements.
c. Limits of construction, clearing, grading, sodding, grass or mulch are shown and are 60
consistent in other disciplines.
60
d. Fire hydrants and street light poles do not conflict with other above ground items.
60
e. Profile sheets show other underground utilities and avoid conflicts.
f. Horizontal distances between drainage structures and manholes match scaled 60

dimensions and stated dimensions on both plan and profile sheets.
30
g. Building footprint and finished floor elevations match other disciplines.
Coordinated
Structural – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
15
a. Column grid lines on structural and architectural match.
15
b. Column locations are the same on structural and architectural.
15
c. Perimeter slab on structural matches architectural.
30
d. Depressed or raised slabs are indicated and match architectural.
45
Coordinated
Structural (continued) Yes No N/A %
30
e. Slab elevations match architectural.
60
f. Foundation piers are identified and sized on a schedule or plan.
60
g. Foundation beams are identified and sized on a schedule or plan.
h. Locations of roof framing plan column lines and columns match foundation plan 30
column lines and columns.
30
i. Structural perimeter roof line matches architectural roof plan.
60
j. Columns, floor beams, and roof beams are listed in column and beam schedules.
k. Length of columns in column schedule matches the length shown in sections and 60
the elevations shown on plans.
60
l. Sections are properly labeled.
30
m. Expansion joint locations match other disciplines.
30
n. Dimensions match architectural.
60
o. Drawing notes do not conflict with specifications.
p. Openings or penetrations for stairs, elevators, ducts, conduits, and chases match 30
other disciplines.
Coordinated
Architectural – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
15
a. Property line dimensions on surveyor civil site plans match architectural.
15
b. Building is located behind set-back lines.
c. Locations of columns and bearing walls, and overall building dimensions match 15
structural.
30
d. Existing and new work is clearly identified on site plans.
e. Building elevations match floor plans. In particular, check roof lines, window and 30
door openings, louver openings, and expansion joints.
30
f. Building sections match elevations and plans.
30
g. Wall sections match architectural and structural building sections.
h. Size of openings for windows and doors matches structural. Verify window glass 30
types with specifications.
46
Coordinated
Architectural (continued) Yes No N/A %
30
i. Expansion joints are continuous throughout the building.
60
j. Large scale partial floor plans match small scale floor plans.
k. Reflected ceiling plans match architectural floor plans to ensure no variance with
wall locations. Location of electrical fixtures and mechanical registers/diffusers on 60
electrical and mechanical plans do not conflict with locations on reflected ceiling
plans.
l. Room finish schedule information matches plan and elevation information;

60
including room numbers, names of rooms, finishes, and ceiling heights. Look for
omissions and inconsistencies.
m. Door schedule information matches plan, and elevation information; including 60

sizes, types, labels, etc. Look for omissions and inconsistencies.
n. The location of fire rated walls matches the location of fire and/or smoke dampers 60
on mechanical plans.
o. Cabinets will fit in available space and electrical outlets on cabinet walls are at the 60
correct height.
p. The locations of flag poles, dumpster pads, generator pads, transformers, cooling
60
towers, vaults, and landscaping have been coordinated with other discipline site
plans.
Coordinated
Mechanical/Plumbing – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
15
a. Plumbing floor plans match architectural floor plans.
b. New gas, water, sewer, etc, lines connect to existing or new utilities on civil 30
drawings.
30
c. Plumbing fixtures match plumbing schedules and architectural locations.
30
d. Roof drain locations and roof slopes match architectural roof plan.
e. Pipes are sized sensibly and that all drains are connected and do not interfere with 30
foundations.
30
f. Wall chases are provided on architectural to conceal vertical piping.
60
g. Plumbing fixtures match riser diagrams.
15
h. HVAC floor plans match architectural.
47
Coordinated
Mechanical/Plumbing (continued) Yes No N/A %
30
i. Sprinkler heads do not interfere with other ceiling items.
j. Mechanical/plumbing ducts and pipes do not conflict with architectural features or 30

structural members.
30
k. Adequate ceiling height exists at worst case duct intersection or largest beam.
l. Structural supports required for mechanical equipment are indicated on structural 60

drawings.
60
m. Dampers are indicated at smoke and fire walls.
60
n. Diffuser locations match architectural reflected ceiling plans ans.
o. Openings for roof penetrations (ducts, fans, etc.) are indicated on structural roof 60
plans.
60
p. Ductwork is sized logically.
60
q. Notes are referenced.
r. Air conditioning units, heaters, and exhaust fans match architectural roof plan 60
locations.
s. Mechanical equipment will fit in spaces allocated and that there is room for 60
maintenance such as removing filters or tubes.
t. Horsepower ratings, phases, and voltages of major items of equipment on 60

mechanical and electrical drawings and specifications match.
60
u. Thermostat locations have been coordinated with architectural drawings.
Coordinated
Electrical – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
a. Electrical floor plans match architectural and mechanical. Check that the location 15
of floor mounted equipment is consistent between disciplines.
b. The location of light fixtures matches architectural reflected ceiling plan and that 60
light fixtures do not conflict with the structure or mechanical HVAC system.
c. Major pieces of equipment have electrical connections and that horsepower 60

ratings, phases, and voltages are consistent with other discipline schedules.
d. Locations of panel boards are consistent with architectural, mechanical, and

30
plumbing floor plans and the panel boards are shown on electrical riser diagrams.
48
Coordinated
Electrical (continued) Yes No N/A %
60
e. Notes are referenced.
f. Locations of electrical conduit runs, floor trenches, and openings are coordinated 30
with structural plans.
15
g. Electrical panels are not recessed in fire rated walls.
h. Exterior electrical equipment locations are coordinated with site paving, grading, 30
and landscaping.
60
i. Structural supports are provided for roof top electrical equipment.
Coordinated
Food Service – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
a. The equipment layout matches other discipline floor plans and that there are no 30
conflicts with columns.
30
b. Equipment is connected to utility systems.
c. Equipment as scheduled on the drawings matches the food service floor plans and 60
specifications.
60
d. Floor depressions and floor troughs are coordinated.
Coordinated
Specifications – Verify that: Yes No N/A %
60
a. Check that bid items explicitly state what is intended.
30
b. Check specifications for phasing of construction.
60
c. Compare architectural finish schedule to specification index.
60
d. Check major items of equipment and verify coordinated with contract drawings.
e. Verify that the items specified "as indicated" or "where indicated" in the 60
specifications are in fact indicated on contract drawings.
60
f. Verify the index and sections contained in the body of the specifications match.
60
g. Verify thickness of materials or quantities of materials in specifications.
49
PART C
CONCEPTS
50
CHAPTER 12
REDICHECK CONCEPTS TO
IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The following concepts will improve the quality of any project. These concepts should be
understood by the entire design team prior to the preparation of working drawings.
Concept No. 1 Use the RediCheck checklist during preparation of plans and
specifications, and, if necessary, for a final quality assurance review
at the end of production.
Concept No. 2 Show the right information the least number of times – preferably
only once.
Concept No. 3 Keep the same orientation on all plans.
Concept No. 4 Use consistent terminology between the plans and specifications.
Concept No. 5 Avoid vague notes such as "see architectural" or "see structural".
Concept No. 6 If possible avoid match-lines.
Concept No. 7 Show all wall sections at relative elevations to each other on the
same sheet.
Concept No. 8 Avoid the word "new".
51
CONCEPT NUMBER 1
To pinpoint and avoid potential problems each architect or engineer should use the
portion of the RediCheck checklist that pertains to his discipline as he prepares contract
drawings and specifications.
For example, the engineer preparing the drawings of underground plumbing beneath the
building should be referring to the Mechanical/Plumbing checklist as he works. In doing so he
will find a checklist item that states, "Verify that pipes are sized sensibly and that drains are
connected and do not interfere with foundations," and will know that he needs to know the
elevation and size of structural foundations in order to safely locate underground plumbing
lines. This type of coordination between disciplines should occur early during the preparation
of working drawings. When the working drawings are complete, a final check that the
structural foundations were not moved or changed in size and do not conflict with underground
plumbing lines needs to be made.
All items in the RediCheck checklist should be coordinated no later than the 60% CD
completion stage of the preparation of plans and specifications. Some items such as location of
columns should be "locked in place" much earlier such as the 15% CD completion stage. Refer
to Chapter 12 for the latest percentage (%) stage at which an item should be coordinated.
52
CONCEPT NUMBER 2
If there is a design change, it is much easier to change the item only once. If the item is
cross referenced fifteen times, it is very likely that when a design change occurs, the item will
be corrected fourteen out of the fifteen times - and the one that is missed will be a change
order. Good examples of needless repetitions:
a. Dimensions on large scale plans that already exist on small scale plans.
b. Quantities of equipment shown on drawing schedules and in the specifications.
c. Horsepower ratings for equipment shown on mechanical schedules and in the

specifications.
d. Section marks on building elevations when they already appear on plans.
e. Window marks on floor plans when they are indicated on building elevations.
f. Ceiling heights on finish schedules when they are indicated on reflected ceiling
plans.
Adhering to this concept speeds up the production process as people are not taking time
to duplicate needless items in the plans and specifications.
53
CONCEPT NUMBER 3
Keeping the north arrow in the same direction at all times is much less confusing than
having different orientations between disciplines.
Architectural Floor Plan Electrical Floor Plan
In the example above it is difficult to determine that the architectural and electrical floor
plans are at variance with each other. If the orientation of the two plans were the same it
would be very easy to determine the plans do not match.
54
CONCEPT NUMBER 4
Using consistent terminology between plans and specs will avoid misunderstandings. If
the specifications call an item "fabric panels", the drawings should not identify the same item
as "fabric wrapped sliding acoustical panels". "Trench drains" on plumbing drawings should not
be "troughs" on architectural drawings.
Room names should be the same on all discipline drawings. If the architectural drawings
indicate a room as "Mechanical Equipment Room", the electrical drawings should not refer to
the same room as "Elevator Penthouse".
Mechanical equipment as identified on mechanical schedules should be identified exactly

the same on electrical power plans, panel schedules, or motor control centers. If the
mechanical schedule identifies a cold water pump as "CWP-1" it should be identified exactly the
same on the electrical drawings.
If the specifications call out "stainless steel piping", the drawings should not indicate
"corrosion resistant piping". In this case, the contractor can claim the bid was based on either
galvanized steel or plastic PVC piping and probably win the claim. Consistent terminology can
avoid needless claims.
55
CONCEPT NUMBER 5
Instead of using notes such as "see architectural" or "see structural" always refer to a
specific detail and sheet. Nonspecific notes are generally made when one designer assumes
another discipline will provide a detail, but doesn't check to see that the detail is there.
3
“See Structural” “See “
S11
Incorrect Correct
Common discrepancies are mechanical notes to "see architectural for louver details and
locations" and electrical notes that indicate "see structural for wall and roof equipment
supports". Very often these details do not exist. Avoid this pitfall by insisting that all details be
cross-referenced to a specific detail number and sheet.
56
CONCEPT NUMBER 6
Plans that are split into portions are difficult to read and check. Numerous design errors
have been caused by match-lines that did not line up properly. If match-lines have to be used
due to the size of the project, then make sure all disciplines use the same match-lines.
Architectural Floor Plan Structural Floor Plan
The building above is divided into different quadrants (A, B, C, and D) by the architect and
structural engineer. It is very difficult to make overlays when the quadrants don't match. If the
architect is checking quadrant B, all four structural quadrants must all be checked since they all
overlap architectural quadrant B.
57
CONCEPT NUMBER 7
Drawing continuous horizontal reference lines across drawings that contain sections
makes it easy to show all wall sections at relative elevations to each other on the same sheet.
In the example above, the number of elevation marks is greatly reduced, drafting time is
speeded up, and the sections are clear. If there is a design revision in the elevation marks, it is
easier to make the change.
58
CONCEPT NUMBER 8
All work on the contract drawings is either "existing" or is understood to be "new". When
the word "new" is inserted in a detail it creates the possibility of misunderstandings and claims.
If a note has some items identified as "existing", and some items identified as "new", and some
items not identified as either "existing" or "new", contractual problems can easily arise. The
items that are not identified as "existing" or "new" can often be interpreted either way.
In the example above, confusion arises as to whether the jumper cable, bolt-thru cable
connector, and bonding plates are existing or new.
59
PART D
SAMPLE REDICHECK DISCREPANCIES
We are pleased to share some interesting sample discrepancies that were discovered on
recently reviewed projects. The cost and impact of each discrepancy could be significant if
not discovered prior to construction.
We hope you find these sample discrepancies interesting and informative.
60
CHAPTER 13
SAMPLE REDICHECK DISCREPANCIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Discrepancy Discipline(s) Name Page
Discrepancy 101 Architectural Precast Panel Heights 63

Discrepancy 102 Architectural/Structural Floor Register Openings 65
Discrepancy 103 Architectural/Mechanical Return Air Plenum 68
Discrepancy 104 Architectural/Structural Floor Opening 71
Discrepancy 105 Architectural/Mechanical Ceiling Height 73
Discrepancy 106 Architectural/Electrical RCP vs Lighting Plan 75
Discrepancy 107 Architectural/Structural Skylight Quantity 77
Discrepancy 108 Architectural/Structural Brace Frame Coordination 79
Discrepancy 109 Architectural Exterior Panel Joint Coordination 81
Discrepancy 110 Architectural Sound Attenuation Blankets 83
Discrepancy 111 Architectural Obscure Equipment Requirement 85
Discrepancy 112 Architectural Furniture in Contract? 87
Discrepancy 113 Mechanical Pipe Route Conflict 88
Discrepancy 114 Architectural Wall Types 89
Discrepancy 115 Architectural Elevators 92
Tip 116 Architectural Section References 93
Discrepancy 117 Food Service Equipment 95
Tip 118 Architectural Reflected Ceiling Plans 97
Tip 119 Architectural Door Numbers 98
Tip 120 All Disciplines Drawing Size 100
Discrepancy 121 Architectural Window Heights 102
Discrepancy 122 Civil/Plumbing Connection Coordination 104
Discrepancy 123 Architectural/Electrical Light Fixture Type/Fan Missing 106
Discrepancy 124 Architectural/Electrical Interior Elevation Coordination 107
Discrepancy 125 Architectural/Electrical Door Hardware Coordination 108
Tip 126 Mechanical/Electrical Voltage/Phase 109
Tip 127 All Disciplines Selection Interview 110
Discrepancy 128 Structural/Civil Footing Conflict with Manhole 111
Discrepancy 129 All Disciplines Equipment Schedules 112
Tip 130 All Disciplines Use of the Word “Future” 113
Discrepancy 131 Structural / Landscape Duplicate Bid of Patio Concrete 114
Discrepancy 132 Architectural/Structural Column Orientation 115
Discrepancy 133 Architectural/Electrical Ceiling Fan Rough-In 116
Discrepancy 134 Architectural/Structural Stair Location 117
Discrepancy 135 Architectural/Plumbing Vent Riser Locations 118
Discrepancy 136 Architectural/Electrical Motor Shades 119
Discrepancy 137 Architectural/Plumbing Level 13 120
Discrepancy 138 Architectural/Mechanical Equipment Clearance 121
Discrepancy 139 Architectural/Structural Slab Depressions 122
Discrepancy 140 Architectural/Mechanical Soffit / Duct Coordination 123
61
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Discrepancy Discipline(s) Name Page
Discrepancy 141 Architectural/Mechanical Roof Plan Coordination 124

Discrepancy 142 Architectural/Elec. And Mech. Exterior Elevation Coordination 125
Discrepancy 143 Plumbing/Architectural Riser Diagrams 126
Discrepancy 144 Architectural Building Elevation Coordination 127
Tip 145 Architectural Door Schedule Coordination 128
Discrepancy 146 Structural Steel Member Sizes 129
Discrepancy 147 Architectural/Electrical Coordination in Bathroom Areas 130
Discrepancy 148 Multiple Disciplines Coordination of Exterior Items 131
62
RediCheck Discrepancy
Architectural
Precast Panel Heights
101
Incorrect Reference (4?)
Building Section A-301

9’-3” floor heights above 8th floor are at variance with wall section 4/A-501
(9’-4”). 9’-4” floor heights below 8th floor are at variance with wall section
3/A-501 (9’-3”).
63
At variance with Building At variance with Building Section

Section Drawing A-301 (9’-4”). Drawing A-301 (9’-3”).
Wall Sections – A-501

With 1” discrepancy, confirm (6) red-circled dimensions. Sections 3 and 4 are
incorrectly referenced on many drawings (reversed). If the precast panels are
fabricated according to these sections, there will be (6) floors of 2’-0” high
precast panels and (20) floors of 2’-1” high precast panels. This will result in (14)
floors with incorrectly sized panels.
64
Architectural/Structural
Floor Register Openings
102
Partial Architectural Floor Plan
65
Partial Structural Floor Plan
66
Structural Detail
Discrepancy Narrative
Along the left side of the Sterile Corridor, the slab openings for the floor
mounted supply air registers are missing on structural. There are over (100) of
these openings on this floor level. The register neck size is 30”x6”. Suggest
these be shown on structural so they can be sleeved prior to slab placement to
avoid a costly change order. In addition the Structural Detail shows a significant
amount of re-bar at the opening locations. Suggest review and confirm
placement of these openings at locations with such high concentrations of re-
bar.
67
Architectural/Mechanical
Return Air Plenum
103
Partial HVAC Floor Plan
Notice that Mechanical is using the space above the ceiling as a plenum for the
return air to Heat Pumps (HP-24, HP-25, etc.).
68
Partial Architectural Floor Plan
Wall Partition Type 4
69
Architectural Floor Plan General Notes
General Note 2 states “interior walls extend to underside of deck above…”. This
will prevent return air in Conference 027 and Offices from reaching the plenum
above the corridors. A change order for installing transfer grilles along corridor
walls will be required. This discrepancy occurred at approximately (80) room
locations throughout the building.
70
Floor Opening
104
Partial 1st Floor Architectural Floor Plan (A-101)
71
Partial 1st Floor Structural Framing Plan (S-101)
72
Architectural/Mechanical
Ceiling Height
105
HVAC Duct Space Coordination Matrix
Office ceiling height of 9’-0” is not possible due to stacked ducts above ceiling.
Approximately 26” is required above ceiling and only 18” of total clear space is
available. Either the ceiling must be lowered 8”, or a soffit along the east wall
will be required. On this particular project, similar problems occurred at many
stacked duct locations.
73
Partial HVAC Plan (M-301)
Partial Reflected Ceiling Plan (A-601)
74
Architectural/Electrical
RCP vs Lighting Plan
106
Partial Architectural Reflected Ceiling Plan
Partial Electrical Lighting Plan
75
Light quantity at
variance with each
other (2 versus 1).
Light orientation
at variance with
each other.
Overlay – Reflected Ceiling Plan vs. Lighting Plan
Lighting plans are compared to the reflected ceiling plans. It is typical on most
projects to find discrepancies involving light quantities, types, orientations,
locations, and conflicts with other ceiling mounted items. On this particular
project, all of the patient rooms showed one light fixture on the reflected ceiling
plan and two light fixtures on the electrical lighting plan.
76
Skylight Quantity
107
Partial Architectural Roof Plan
Partial Structural Roof Plan
77
Structural
indicates (3)
skylight openings
versus (2) on
architectural.
Length of skylight
openings (14’-4”
versus 15’-3 ½”) at
variance with each
other.
Overlay – Architectural versus Structural
The structural roof plan indicates (3) skylight openings versus (2) skylights on
architectural. Additionally, the length of the skylight openings is 14’-4” on
structural versus 15’-3 ½” on architectural.
78
Brace Frame Coordination
108
Partial Basement Level Floor Plan Partial Main Level Floor Plan
Notice the brace frame indicated in red between Grids H and I along Grid 4. See
Brace Framing elevation on next page.
79
Brace Framing Elevation
The brace framing blocks a door located at the Basement Level and blocks a
corridor opening located at the Main Level. If the structural brace is a design
requirement that cannot be moved, a new floor plan design would be required.
80
Architectural
Exterior Panel Joint Coordination
109
Unfolded Exterior Elevation - 2 Unfolded Exterior Elevation - 1
The unfolded elevations occurred on different drawings. The match line requires
drawing rotation to align. See next page.
81
Overlay of Unfolded Exterior Elevations
When Elevation 1 is rotated and overlaid with Elevation 2, there is an area of
metal panels between the elevations that is missing. In addition, the near
horizontal panel joints are not aligned and likely not an acceptable design
feature.
82
Architectural
Sound Attenuation Blankets
110
83
The extent of sound attenuation blankets is confusing and could result in the
sound attenuation not being installed where needed. This could result in
significant change orders as the entire building (with over 1,000 rooms) contains
this discrepancy. It appears the Partition Notes were copied from a previous
project and not updated to reflect the method of designation on the current
project.
84
Architectural
Obscure Equipment Requirement
111
Parking Stall Striping Plan
SHEET NOTES:
1. PROVIDE MOTORIZED INTEGRATED
SWEEPER/SCRUBBER
MANUF: TENNANT COMPANY
MODEL: M20
FEATURES: OPEN OPERATOR COMPARTMENT
SIDE BRUSH
EC-H2O WATER ECONOMY
BACK-UP ALARM
SEAT BELT
NON-MARKING TIRES
GAS ENGINE
85
On the Parking Stall Striping Plan, there is a note that indicates a Motorized
Sweeper/Scrubber and to see Sheet Note 1. Notice that the note reference is
obscured, overprinted, and indicated with a lighter typeface. It appears that the
Owner’s intention is for a $50,000 sweeper/scrubber to be provided. However,
this is the only reference to this equipment on any plans or specs. It could easily
be overlooked and may not be reasonable to assume the pavement striping
subcontractor or the general contractor would locate and identify this contract
requirement. Unnecessary conflicts and change orders can be avoided if
equipment requirements are clearly identified and/or specified in appropriate
places.
86
Architectural
Furniture in Contract?
112
GENERAL NOTES
1. REFER TO SYMBOLS LEGEND FOR SYMBOLS.
2. NOTES APPEAR ON VARIOUS DRAWINGS FOR DIFFERENT SYSTEMS AND

MATERIALS. REVIEW ALL SHEETS AND APPLY NOTES TO RELATED
BUILDING COMPONENTS.
3. REFER TO COMPLETE SET OF ISSUED CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR

OTHER APPLICABLE NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS.
4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS; DIMENSIONS GOVERN. FOR DIMENSIONS

NOT SHOWN OR IN QUESTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST
CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING.
5. "TYPICAL" MEANS THE REFERENCED DETAIL SHALL APPLY FOR ALL

SIMILAR CONDITIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
.
.
.
15. FURNITURE PLANS, IF PROVIDED, ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION

ONLY.
16. THE MOST CURRENT DATED DRAWINGS SUPERSEDE ALL PREVIOUS

DATED DRAWINGS.
Interior General Notes
Note 15 above indicates that the Furniture Plans are “For Information Only”
which is at variance with a series of Interior Furniture Plans provided and Spec
Section 124000 that both imply the furniture is in the contract. For this project,
there is approximately $2 million worth of furniture which the Owner expects is
in the contract. It appears that the General Note was copied from a previous
project and not updated. The furniture would have been in dispute.
87
Mechanical
Pipe Route Conflict
113
Hydronic Piping Plan
Notice that (4) pipes pass through an elevator shaft. Due to the location of the
adjacent stair, a significant change in pipe layout is required.
88
Architectural
Wall Types
114
Portion of Wall Type Drawing
This drawing contained (14) different wall types, of which (2) are shown above
along with the Wall Tag Key.
89
20
Enlarged Wall Tag Key
Material Type Key 07 indicates GWB which is at variance with the Example
(Cement Board). Also, the red-circled Smoke Rating 10 appears to be incorrect,
should it be 20 to indicate 2 Hour Rating?
90
Enlarged Material Type Keys
The Material Type Key was duplicated at all (14) wall types. This added
unnecessary clutter to an already busy drawing. If a change to the Material Type
Key needs to be made, it will have to be changed (14) times at each wall type.
The Material Type Key should only be indicated once in the General Note area on
this drawing.
91
Architectural
Elevators
115
Elevators
A quick check of the elevator specs usually offers a high possibility of finding
discrepancies with the drawings. The problem usually develops when the
preliminary elevator specs do not get updated at the completion of the
construction drawings. Confirming the following items in the elevator schedule
in the specs versus the drawings will eliminate many common coordination
errors.
A. Travel distance
B. Number of stops
C. Number and level of front and/or rear openings
D. Height and width of elevator openings
E. Type of doors (side or center opening)
F. Elevator cab dimensions
G. Elevator cab finishes
92
RediCheck Tip
Architectural
Section References
116
Stair Plan
It is never a good idea to make section cuts facing towards the bottom of a drawing such
as section reference A1/AE4201 on the Stair Plan above. When this occurs it is hard
(due to 180 degree rotation) to orient the Stair Section to match the section (see next
page). If the section cut reference were facing towards the top of the drawing,
confusion and/or mistakes in reading the drawings would be minimized resulting in
many advantages such as:
A. Easier bidding
B. Easier construction
C. Easier checking
Conclusions
If you are a designer, eliminate all section cuts facing towards the bottom of a drawing.
If you are an Owner and have Design Standards that your A/E must incorporate, add this
to your Design Standards.
93
Stair Section
94
Food Service
Equipment
117
Often food service equipment schedules on the drawings repeat information in
the food service specs. Whenever information is repeated, there is an
opportunity for discrepancies and/or change orders. This occurs because the
information is later changed in one place and not the other. For example, in the
drawing equipment schedule below, notice that the make/model number and
the quantity of each food service item are indicated.
Also notice that the specs are indicating the make/model number and the
quantity of each food service item. There are discrepancies between the
drawing schedule above and the specs below. There are typically discrepancies
related to electrical and plumbing requirements as well which are also high
payoff reviews.
95
Conclusions
It is never a good idea to needlessly duplicate information between the
drawings and specs. In this case, it is suggested that the equipment
make/model numbers only appear in the specs, and the quantities, if they are
indicated at all, only appear on the drawings.
96
RediCheck Tip
Architectural
Reflected Ceiling Plans
118
As a result of receiving projects for review often prepared by different
Architect/Engineer (A/E) firms, we have the unique opportunity to see how different
firms prepare their drawings and specs. Sometimes we see something new or different
that makes a lot of sense that other owners and A/Es could benefit from.
For example, the method of having a default RCP ceiling height (such as 9’-3” as
on the sample below) has many advantages.
With the default ceiling height only the exceptions need to be indicated and if
the default ceiling height ever needs to be changed, it only needs to be changed
once on the sheet.
On some projects we review the ceiling heights are only indicated on the Finish
Schedule. These occur in a ceiling height column with a ceiling height for each
room. When multiple ceiling heights occur in one room, the schedule indicates
“varies” which is not very helpful. If a common ceiling height needs to be
changed, multiple room heights need correction.
Recommend showing ceiling heights on RCPs and not indicating ceiling heights
on room finish schedules.
97
RediCheck Tip
Architectural
Door Numbers
119
RediCheck Tip
Architect/Engineer (A/E) firms, we have the unique opportunity to see how
different firms prepare their drawings and specs. Sometimes we see something
new or different that makes a lot of sense that many Owners and A/E’s could
benefit from.
For example, on architectural floor plans, suggest provide the following general
note:
“All rooms that have one door have door numbers the same as the room
number” and that “Rooms with multiple doors will be identified with extensions
starting with .1”. See sample floor plan.
Sample Floor Plan
98
Conclusion
The advantage of using this convention is door numbers for rooms with one
door never need to be indicated on floor plans and doors are easily found. In
this case, door numbers only need to be indicated on door schedules with far
less chance of error. Also, there is less clutter on the floor plans especially
when large projects have large alpha-numeric door numbers.
99
RediCheck Tip
All Disciplines
Drawing Size
120
RediCheck Tip
Architect/Engineer (A/E) firms, we have the unique opportunity to see how
different firms prepare their drawings and specs. Sometimes we see something
new or different that makes a lot of sense that many Owners and A/E’s could
benefit from.
For example, using the ANSI “D” drawing size of 22”x34” with 1/8” height
lettering has tremendous advantages over larger size drawings such as 24”x36”
or 30”x42”. Most owners, contractors, and designers use ½ size drawings for
reference and/or bidding. ANSI “D” drawings at ½ size are 11”x17” which is
convenient and very inexpensive to print (usually 10 cents a copy in quantity).
With the 1/8” height lettering all notes are readable at ½ size as per the sample
below.
½ Size Sample Drawing
100
Conclusions
Some projects will be more suitable for larger size drawings such as 30”x42”,
however, where possible, suggest use the ANSI “D” drawing size 22”x34” with
1/8” high lettering on future projects. Over the life of the project, owners will
save significant printing costs, contractors will appreciate the smaller readable
drawings during bidding and construction, and A/E’s will, in my opinion, be
providing a more economic and useful set of construction documents.
101
Architectural
Window Heights
121
Building Exterior Elevation
On the Elevation above, Window Types 20 and 76 are shown with the same
height and the head and sills are in alignment.
102
Window Schedule – Type 20
Window Schedule – Type 76
Conclusion
It is important to verify the sizes of all windows between the Window Schedule
and Building Exterior Elevations to avoid these types of discrepancies.
103
Civil/Plumbing
Connection Coordination
122
Civil/Plumbing Connection Coordination
It is important to verify that new gas, water, sewer, fire, etc., lines connect to
existing or new utilities on civil drawings. Civil utility plans and plumbing floor
plans should be compared for utility line size discrepancies and inconsistent
connection point locations. Plumbing plans typically connect with civil utilities
five feet beyond the building perimeter. Invert elevations should be verified
between plumbing and civil drawings.
In the Utility Plan below, the location of the CW and FIRE lines on plumbing are
located on the opposite side of the building. Also, plumbing indicates a 6” FIRE
line versus 8” FIRE on civil. The sanitary line must exit below the basement slab
(FFE=725’-0”), but the cleanout on civil indicates an invert of 728.42 just outside
the building.
Drawing C-6.9 – Civil Utility Plan
104
Drawing P3.9
Drawing P3.20
Conclusion
Civil utility connections must be coordinated to avoid costly change orders. If these
errors were not discovered during the review process, significant problems would have
occurred.
105
Light Fixture Type/Fan Missing
123
It is important to verify the types and locations of light fixtures and ceiling
mounted devices between architectural reflected ceiling plans and electrical.
Check for conflicts with columns, ceiling diffusers, ceiling grids, skylights,
expansion joints, drapery or folding partition tracks, sprinklers, and/or soffits.
Make sure that recessed or surface mounted light fixtures are suitable for the
ceiling.
In the example below, we discovered a discrepancy concerning the light fixture

type in the dining room (single lamp versus track). Also, a ceiling fan is not
provided by electrical, but appears to be desired by architectural. These
discrepancies would have resulted in a large change order because these plans
represented an apartment unit that occurred (86) times in the apartment
complex.
Architectural Reflected Ceiling Plan Electrical Power/Lighting Plan
106
Interior Elevation Coordination
124
It is important to verify that other disciplines have been coordinated with the
architectural interior elevations. Numerous conflicts can be avoided by locating
all devices. The focus of this discrepancy is electrical coordination which would
include outlets, electrical panels, audio visual equipment (smart boards, flat
screen TVs, projector screens), security devices (cameras, card readers, etc.), fire
alarm devices, clocks, etc.
In the example below, we discovered several discrepancies. It is common for

millwork to block electrical outlets or electrical panels and to have outlet height
discrepancies. It is also a good idea to ensure electrical devices are not located
at glass such as sidelights or windows.
Architectural Interior Elevation
107
Door Hardware Coordination
125
The specification hardware schedule should be coordinated with the door
schedule, electrical power, and security plans.
Many hardware schedules list the door numbers where they are used. This
invariably leads to variances with the door schedule (incorrect door numbers,
hardware sets, etc.). We recommend indicating information once, and not
repeating information unnecessarily.
When checking the door schedule versus the hardware schedule, look for the
following:
- Double/single door versus the number of hinges
- Fire/smoke doors have appropriate smoke seals and closers
- All hardware sets indicated on the door schedule exist
When checking the hardware schedule versus electrical power plans, security
plans, and fire alarm plans, look for the following:
- Devices (card readers, automatic door openers, magnetic contacts,

etc.) provided in the hardware sets match the plans
Sample Hardware Schedule
108
RediCheck Tip
Mechanical/Electrical
Voltage/Phase
126
Coordination of the voltage/phase of major equipment with electrical power plans is

essential to prevent problems with long lead mechanical procurement items.
For any electrical panel fed by (4) wires there will always be (2) voltages
available. In the example below, the (2) voltages are 208 and 120.
By only looking at the number of poles/circuits, you can easily determine if

electrical is providing the proper voltage/phase to match mechanical schedules.
The following examples are typical:
When (1) pole/circuit is utilized,

the equipment will receive single
phase power at the lower voltage.
For example, cold water pump
(CWP-3) is being provided single
phase power at 120 volts by
circuit 7.
When (2) poles/circuits are utilized,

the equipment will receive single
phase power at the higher voltage.
For example, hot water pump
(HWP-5) is being provided single
phase power at 208 volts by circuits
9 and 11.
When (3) poles/circuits are utilized,

the equipment will receive three phase
power at the higher voltage. For example,
air handling unit (AHU-1) is being
provided three phase power at 208
volts by circuits 1, 3, and 5.
109
RediCheck Tip
All Disciplines
Selection Interview
127
RediCheck Tip
Prior to starting The RediCheck Firm in 1986, Bill Nigro was Course Director for
Design Contract Management, a U.S. Naval Facilities (NAVFAC) course with the
objective to understand the relationships between the various personnel in A/E
contracting. A part of the course was how to select A/E’s for Navy design work.
Drawing upon the best minds in the NAVFAC engineering field divisions and
NAVFAC headquarters, it was concluded that the success or failure of any
design contract rested on the communication skills of the project architect or
engineer. With this in mind, a major point in the course was to determine in
advance the communication skills of the proposed architect or engineer.
Once firms were short-listed, we taught that it should be a requirement to have

the proposed project architect or engineer do the majority of the presentation
to the selection committee. What better way of demonstrating communication
skills? If this is not required, you will be hearing from a silver tongued principal
or head of marketing who promises the world and likely will never be heard
from again.
Conclusion
If you are an owner in charge of a selection process, suggest you require the
proposed project architect/engineer make the majority of the presentation. If
you are a principal for an A/E firm making a presentation to any owner, you
would probably score well by stating “we know the success or failure of any
project rests on the communication skills of our project architect and that’s why
I’m letting _________ do the rest of the presentation so he/she can explain how
your project will be managed.”
110
Structural / Civil
Footing Conflict with Manhole
128
Structural Foundation Plan (Black ) Overlay with Civil Draining Plan (Blue)
This multi-unit housing project had a large pool courtyard area with a storm
manhole adjacent to one of the building footings. The base of the manhole was
at -5’-0” elevation and the bottom of the adjacent F-7.5 footing (1’-9” thick)
was -4’-5”. The project specs did not indicate special sealing or coating for the
manhole which with leakage could cause the adjacent higher building footing to
settle.
Conclusion
It is always a good idea to check civil and plumbing plans versus structural
foundation plans to avoid potential conflicts. In this case, the building footing
should be lower and the manhole specified with special sealing or coating due
to its unique location within the building footprint.
111
All Disciplines
Equipment Schedules
129
At variance with 115486/2.1A

(appears to be CFCI)
Verifying that all Owner Furnished Owner Installed (OFOI) equipment is correctly
classified can prevent conflicts and/or change orders. When OFOI equipment is
present, suggest confirm all OFOI designations.
In this example, a $200,000 laboratory tunnel washer should have been

Contractor Furnished Contractor Installed (CFCI) instead of OFOI.
112
RediCheck Tip
All Disciplines
Use of Word “Future”
130
Chilled and Piping Flow Diagram
RediCheck Tip
The word “future” always implies “not in this contract”. Inadvertent “future”
designations, sometimes copied from earlier phases when the work was
“future”, can result in costly change orders.
In this example, not removing “future” could easily result in a $250,000

equipment change order.
Conclusion
On phased construction projects, suggest globally search for “future”
designated items and confirm they are still “future”.
113
Structural / Landscape
Duplicate Bid of Patio Concrete
131
Drawing S1.13 (Patio)
Drawing L402
Checking limits of construction between Landscape and Structural plans for
exterior slabs will often pay dividends. In this example, both disciplines indicate
the same patio concrete.
114
Architectural / Structural
Column Orientation
132
Column orientation at
variance with each other
Blue = Architectural
Black = Structural
Overlay Architectural vs Structural Floor Plan
Confirming column orientation between architectural and structural yields an

interesting result in this garage parking stall area. If column is constructed as per
structural orientation, parking will be restricted.
115
Architectural / Electrical
Ceiling Fan Rough-In
133
Unit Reflected Ceiling Plan
Lack of coordination of rough-in items on electrical (no fan) with architectural

(fan) could result in a change order for over (300) fans in this apartment
complex.
116
Stair Location
134
Overlay Architectural vs Structural Floor Plan
Late change in architectural location of garage stair is not coordinated with

structural.
117
Architectural / Plumbing
Vent Riser Locations
135
Architectural Floor Plan
It is always a good idea to locate all vertical piping to ensure adequate wall
thickness and appropriate location (see window example above).
118
Motor Shades
136
Interior Design Reflected Ceiling Plan
Checking electrical power plans versus reflected ceiling plans for all devices
needing power (motorized shades, projectors, screens, cameras, lights, etc.)
often yields instances where power is not provided.
119
Architectural / Plumbing
Level 13
137
Plumbing Riser Diagram with Superimposed Architectural Elevations
The riser diagrams indicated floors and floor elevations. On this project, the 13th
floor was not used and the floor to floor height was typically changed during
design from 10’-6” to 10’-8”. The Plumbing, Fire Protection, and Lighting Control
designers were apparently not aware of these changes by Architectural. This
resulted in most floor designations, elevations, and total height of the building to
be incorrect on the riser diagrams for these disciplines. Since Plumbing, Fire
Protection, and Lighting Control all indicated (27) total floors and Architectural
only had (26) total floors, the extra floor could easily result in an overbid
situation.
120
Architectural / Mechanical
Equipment Clearance
138
Mechanical Drawing - Garage
Three condensing units (CU-B1-5, 6, and 7) are indicated by the note above to be
suspended with the bottom of the units at 8’-6” above the floor. The purpose of
this note was to provide proper clearance for vehicle aisle traffic in the garage.
After calculating available ceiling height and subtracting the condenser height,
there was only 4’-6” clearance available. The condensing units needed to be
moved to a different location. The lesson learned was to always verify
clearances for unusual suspended items.
121
Slab Depressions
139
Shaded area indicates

2” depression
Architectural
2” depression not
provided (diagonal hatch)
Structural
Slab configurations such as floor elevations, slab edges, depressions, ramps, etc.,
should be coordinated between Architectural and Structural. In the example
above, the 2” depression in the two bathrooms is missing on Structural.
122
Soffit / Duct Coordination
140
Mechanical HVAC Plan
Ductwork should be sized logically. In the example above, the 10”x10” duct
becomes 18”x10” downstream at the sidewall diffuser. The larger duct size is
unnecessary. Also, the exhaust fan is missing exhaust ductwork.
HVAC drawings should be compared to architectural reflected ceiling plans to

look for conflicts with lights, dropped soffits, and skylights. In the example
above, a portion of the supply ductwork is exposed. A change in soffit design or
re-routing of the duct is required to resolve.
123
Roof Plan Coordination
141
Roof Plan Overlay – Mechanical (Blue) vs Architectural (Black)
HVAC roof plans should be compared to architectural roof plans to look for
conflicts with mechanical equipment locations. In the example above, the
condensing unit locations are configured differently. This also impacts the roof
walk pad locations that will be required.
124
Architectural / Elec. and Mech.
Exterior Elevation Coordination
142
Exterior Elevation
Verify that building elevations match floor plans. In particular, check roof lines,
window and door openings, louver openings, exterior light fixtures, and
expansion joints. If the floor plans are not the same scale as the elevations,
electronic overlays with scale adjustments can be helpful. Also overlay
architectural elevations with mechanical plans to verify location and size of wall
louvers, and electrical lighting plans to verify location and mounting height of
exterior fixtures.
In the example above, all mechanical and electrical items were not shown on the
building elevations. This could result in unintended conflicts and/or design
issues.
125
Plumbing / Architectural
Riser Diagrams
143
Verify that plumbing fixtures (quantities, types, locations) and vertical riser pipe
sizes on plumbing plans match riser diagrams. In addition, plumbing floor plans
should be overlaid with architectural floor plans to confirm all plumbing fixtures
are properly located.
The example above shows several typical discrepancies found:
- Quantities of fixtures at variance with plans
- Plumbing fixture tags at variance with plans or fixture schedule
126
Architectural
Building Elevation Coordination
144
Verify that building elevations match floor plans. In particular, check roof lines,
window/door openings, and expansion joints. It is also helpful to locate scuppers,
louvers, downspouts, exhaust wall caps, meter boxes, wall hydrants, gas manifolds,
FDC’s, lights, and cameras. To avoid unintended consequences, the architect should
indicate these items on the elevations.
127
RediCheck Tip
Architectural
Door Schedule Coordination
145
The door schedule requires significant coordination within the architectural plans, but
also with other disciplines such as electrical and mechanical. We suggest the following
items be reviewed:
 Verify that door schedule information matches plan and elevation information;
including sizes (single vs pair), types, labels, etc. Ensure all doors are scheduled.
 Ensure fire rated doors are coordinated with life safety plans.
 Scan the schedule for obvious omissions by checking that all boxes are filled in.
 Look for inconsistencies. For example, if all except one door along a certain corridor are
fire rated there is probably an error.
 Mechanical HVAC floor plans indicate doors that require louvers and undercut
requirements. Confirm these items have been coordinated.
 Verify hardware sets on schedule match specifications, security, life safety, and
electrical requirements.
It is easier to check similar doors as a group than to check each individual door in
sequence on the schedule. For example, check aluminum storefront doors at once, then
steel doors, then hollow core wood doors, then solid core doors, and then fire rated
doors.
128
Structural
Steel Member Sizes
146
Steel member sizes may not be what you think. For example, not all 18” wide flange
beams are a maximum of 18” deep and not all 14” wide flange columns are a maximum
of 14” deep.
Be aware that actual wide flange steel depths and widths can exceed nominal sizes. For
example, a W18x119 beam is actually 19” deep (not 18”). A W14x550 column has a
depth of 20 ¼” and a flange width of 17 ¼” (not 14”). Suggest confirm steel member
sizes with the Manual of Steel Construction published by The American Institute of Steel
Construction. Doing so will likely avoid an unintended ceiling height or expansion joint
problem.
In the example below, the design team located (2) W14x550 columns 16” apart at a 2”
expansion joint. They did not realize the actual flange width of the W14x550 was not
14”. With the actual size of 17 ¼”, the columns overlapped and the expansion joint was
not possible.
16”
ACTUAL DEPTH
20 ¼”
W14x550 W14x550
17 ¼” 17 ¼”
ACTUAL FLANGE WIDTH 2” ACTUAL FLANGE WIDTH
EXPANSION
JOINT
129
Coordination in Bathroom Areas
147
Coordination of above counter receptacles in relation to backsplashes and mirrors is
often overlooked. Electrical drawings by default typically mount all receptacles in a
vertical position. Often a horizontal mounted receptacle in this location is desired by the
architect. Suggest that all required horizontal receptacles be so noted on the electrical
plans.
In addition, we often find incorrect stud partition depths in ADA bathroom partitions
when recessed electrical panels in adjoining spaces are located in shared bathroom
partitions. The problem occurs where blocking for grab bars is needed. In order for the
blocking and the recessed panel to fit, a minimum of a 6” stud depth is required.
130
Multiple Disciplines
Coordination of Exterior Items
148
We often see coordination problems between disciplines with exterior items. For
example, the architectural roof plan (below left) has condensing units located on the
roof, while the mechanical floor plan shows them outside the building (below right).
Architectural Roof Plan Mechanical Floor Plan
Here are a few other areas that are commonly not coordinated:
- Quantity and configuration of roof top condensing units. These should be

coordinated between architectural, mechanical, structural, and electrical. In
addition, walkway pad configurations on architectural roof plans are directly
affected by this coordination.
- Transformer pad locations and size conflicts between electrical and civil.
- Landscape coordination including planting areas, sidewalks, etc. For example, tree
locations on landscaping in conflict with light poles on electrical.
131

Redi Check

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Redi Check

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Construction Document Review

William T. Nigro, AIA

Before You Build It … RediCheck It!

RediCheck Interdisciplinary Coordination

© Copyright 2015 by William T. Nigro

Illustrations by Larry Peacock

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Chapter 1 – Definition and Benefits of RediCheck ............................................................ 7

Chapter 2 – RediCheck in Your Firm ................................................................................. 13

Chapter 3 – Performing the RediCheck Review ................................................................ 19

Part B – Interdisciplinary Checklists

Chapter 4 – Civil/Landscape Interdisciplinary Checklist ................................................... 26

Chapter 5 – Structural Interdisciplinary Checklist ............................................................ 28

Chapter 6 – Architectural Interdisciplinary Checklist ....................................................... 31

Chapter 7 – Mechanical/Plumbing Interdisciplinary Checklist ......................................... 34

Chapter 8 – Electrical Interdisciplinary Checklist .............................................................. 38

Chapter 9 – Food Service Interdisciplinary Checklist ........................................................ 41

Chapter 10 – Specifications Checklist ............................................................................... 42

Chapter 11 – Consolidated RediCheck Checklist .............................................................. 45

Chapter 12 – RediCheck Concepts to Improve the Quality of Contract Documents ........ 51

Part D – Sample RediCheck Discrepancies

Chapter 13 – Sample RediCheck Discrepancies ................................................................ 61

Definition and Benefits of RediCheck ..................................................................... 3

RediCheck in Your Firm ........................................................................................... 8

Performing the RediCheck Review ....................................................................... 14

DEFINITION AND BENEFITS

Many types of construction document reviews exist. Constructibility reviews, single

• Electrical drawings that indicate items of equipment with different horsepower

The RediCheck interdisciplinary concept is based on the sequence of construction. In a

RediCheck is not intended to be a technical review. It should not replace or be confused

When proper interdisciplinary coordination occurs, everyone wins. Owners, contractors,

U.S. Navy Change Order Percentages

78 828.0 57.7 7.0

OICC Trident Change Order Percentages

78 102.4 7.6 7.4

REDICHECK IN YOUR FIRM

Incorporating an interdisciplinary review such as RediCheck into a firm's routine is not

The purpose of coordination meetings is to discuss items which impact interdisciplinary

RediCheck Schedule Milestones

When Item Who

After Perform RediCheck Spot Check

Recommended RediCheck Spot Check

Chapter Discipline Items

Estimated Minutes/Drawing for RediCheck Review

Drawing Size 24x36 30x42 36x48

During a final review it is important to keep the number of RediCheck reviewers to an

Red Star Significant Item

AVW At Variance With

CNL Could Not Locate

When overlaying documents, we recommend electronic overlays be used. The drawings

Sample Electronic Overlay

b. Column locations are the same on structural and architectural.

Here are some sample drawings with RediCheck Review comments:

Sample Civil Drawing

Sample Architectural Drawing

Sample Mechanical Drawing

Sample Plumbing Drawing

Sample Electrical Drawing

B. For all red-marked comments, do one of the following:

Agree with the comment and revision made

Explanation, coordination required, or disagree with comment

Chapter 4 – Civil/Landscape Interdisciplinary Checklist ....................................... 26

Chapter 5 – Structural Interdisciplinary Checklist ................................................ 28

Project Title _________________ Project No.

Reviewer’s Signature ______ Date _