Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EVMs
EVMs
EVMs
They don’t bargain morality and they do not barter goodness. No sir, they do
not ever do this because, you know what? They would rather die — on the big
screen, that is — before they indulge the whims and fancies of their most vile,
most despicable and definitely most unworthy enemies. That is not how
honourable men and women behave. And PTI is, after all, a party of
honourable men and women.
Which is why the PTI pretends EVMs are the panacea this country needs. The
PTI also pretends Daska never happened. It pretends dozens of election
officials were not kidnapped by officials of PTI’s own government, and that the
atrocity of electoral manipulation led to the whole contest being cancelled. The
PTI also pretends the Election Commission did not issue a report that proves
that rigging took place in Daska and that the Punjab administration was
culpable. No one will raise Daska, no one will talk Daska, and no one will
address Daska. So let’s pretend EVMs will ensure Daska does not happen
again.
The vast majority of the bills — 29, to be exact — that were enacted into law by
the joint session had been passed by the National Assembly, and were in the
Senate for deliberation. Article 70 of the Constitution provides for bills, under
certain circumstances, to be considered in a joint sitting; it certainly does not
envisage them being forced through in the roughshod way witnessed this
week, without allowing for any meaningful debate or voting on the clauses
contained therein that is required by the relevant rules of procedure.
No less than six bills pertained to Islamabad, including the Food Safety and
Rent Restriction Amendment bills. Among the other bills were also the
Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2021, and the Anti-Rape (Investigation and
Trial) Bill, 2021, stipulating the use of modern technology and setting up of
special courts to investigate and try rape cases. These provisions to address
the crime of rape had first been introduced through an ordinance in 2020, and
were later tabled as proposed statutory legislation and passed by the Lower
House.
Herein may lie the answer as to why the PTI government thought it fit to bring
this massive legislative agenda to a single joint session of parliament. Time
and again it has demonstrated an authoritarian streak that has little patience
for parliamentary conventions and rules or the importance of having diverse
points of view feed into lawmaking. That has translated into a plethora of
legislation by executive decree during the last three years. Certainly, bypassing
parliament is hardly the sole preserve of this government; ordinances are a
convenient tool to avoid justifying proposed legislation to the opposition
benches. But this week, the PTI government’s show of political expediency and
its disdain for the grave responsibility of lawmaking offers yet more cause for
alarm.
It is ironic that while the joint sitting was passing the law to introduce
electronic voting in the country, the electronic automatic vote recorder and its
display boards already installed in the National Assembly chamber incurring
quite a handsome amount of taxpayers’ money remained unused as they have
for the last many years. It is about time the electronic voting system within
parliament was revived.
The flaws in the joint sitting proceedings reflect a poor quality of democracy
which seems to be getting worse with each such development.