MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JUAN P. DELA CRUZ Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher/ Head Teacher/ Principal
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Davao City Division Date of Review: February 10, 2023
Rating Period: September 2022-February 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Knowledge knowledge of 21% Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services and content within and 2023 or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form/s done
teaching areas. through onsite /face-to-face/in-
(PPST 1.1.2) person classroom observation
Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person evidence was evidence was
shown shown
classes are not implemented,
● through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 2. Used a range September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services strategies that 2023 or inter-observer
enhance learner agreement form/s done
achievement in through onsite /face-to-face/in-
literacy and person classroom observation
numeracy skills.
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
(PPST 1.4.2)
classes are not implemented,
● through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
modalities; or Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
● through observation of a shown shown
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 3. Applied a range September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1

2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services strategies to 2023 or inter-observer
develop critical agreement form/s done
and creative through onsite /face-to-face/in-
thinking, as well person classroom observation.
as other higher-
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
order thinking
classes are not implemented, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
skills. (PPST ● through observation of evidence was evidence was
1.5.2) synchronous/asynchron shown shown
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education Environment classroom Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services & Diversity of structure to 2023 or inter-observer
Learners engage learners, agreement form/s done
individually or in through onsite /face-to-face/in-
groups, in person classroom observation.
meaningful Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
exploration, evidence was evidence was
classes are not implemented, shown shown
discovery and ● through observation of
hands-on synchronous/asynchron
activities within a ous teaching in other
range of physical modalities; or
environments. ● through observation of a
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
(PPST 2.3.2) demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education learner behavior Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services constructively by 2023 or inter-observer
applying positive agreement form/s done
and non-violent through onsite /face-to-face/in-
discipline to person classroom observation.
ensure learning-
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
focused Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
classes are not implemented, evidence was evidence was
environments. ● through observation of shown shown
(PPST 2.6.2) synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 6. Used September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services developmentally 2023 or inter-observer
appropriate agreement form/s done
learning through onsite /face-to-face/in-
experiences to person classroom observation.
address learners’
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
gender, needs,
classes are not implemented,
strengths, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
● through observation of evidence was evidence was
interests and synchronous/asynchron shown shown
experiences. ous teaching in other
(PPST 3.1.2) modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services implemented 2023 or inter-observer
developmentally agreement form/s done
sequenced through onsite /face-to-face/in-
teaching and person classroom observation.
learning Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person evidence was evidence was
processes to
classes are not implemented, shown shown
meet curriculum ● through observation of
requirements and synchronous/asynchron
varied teaching ous teaching in other
contexts. (PPST modalities; or
4.1.2) ● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
8. Participated in September 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality 4 Attended in LAC 4 Attended in LAC 4
2022-July LAC sessions/FGDs/ sessions/FGDs/ sessions/FGDs/
collegial
2023 meetings/ meetings/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial other collegial other collegial
use teacher and discussions discussions that discussions that
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC sessions discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/
to enrich teaching / FGDs/ meetings/ other learner feedback learner feedback
collegial discussions on use to enrich to enrich
practice. (PPST instruction, as instruction, as
of teacher and learner
4.4.2) shown in MOV shown in MOV
feedback to enrich teaching
1 1
practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs / meetings/
other collegial discussions Timeliness* 5 Participated in 5 Participated in 5
that use teacher and learner collegial collegial
feedback to enrich teaching discussions that discussions that
discuss teacher discuss teacher
practice, with proof/s of
and learner and learner
attendance feedback feedback
4. Any equivalent ALS across 4 across 4
form/document that quarters quarters
highlights the objective
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 9. Selected, September Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July evidence was evidence was
Education developed, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s shown shown
Services organized and 2023 or inter-observer
used appropriate agreement form/s done
teaching and through onsite /face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom observation.
resources,
including ICT, to If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
address learning classes are not implemented, Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
evidence was evidence was
goals. (PPST ● through observation of shown shown
4.5.2) synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 4. 10. Designed, September 21% Classroom Observation Quality 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
2022-July Tool (COT) rating sheet/s evidence was evidence was
Education Assessment selected,
2023 shown shown
Services and organized and or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form/s done
formative and through onsite /face-to-face/in-
summative person classroom observation.
assessment
If onsite/face-to-face/in-person
strategies Efficiency 1 No acceptable 1 No acceptable 1
classes are not implemented,
consistent with ● through observation of
evidence was evidence was
shown shown
curriculum synchronous/asynchron
requirements. ous teaching in other
(PPST 5.1.2) modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 11. Monitored and September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 3 Monitored 3 Monitored 3
Education evaluated learner 2022-July ● Individual Learning and and
2023 Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
Services progress and evaluated evaluated
achievement ● Peer assessment data learner learner
using learner ● Sample of learners’ progress and progress and
attainment data output with achievement achievement
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
reflection/self- based on an based on an
assessment existing existing
● Progress grade grade
charts/anecdotal level/depart level/depart
records ment ment
● Class/e-class learning learning
record/grading sheets
area report area report
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with Timeliness 3 Submitted 3 Submitted 3
identified least/most MOV/s MOV/s
mastered skills monitoring monitoring
● Any equivalent ALS and and
form/document that evaluation evaluation
highlights the objective done across done across
(e.g. Individual Learning 2 quarters 2 quarters
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. September Any one (1) of the following: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education Communicated ● A sample of corrected
2023 clearly using clearly using
Services promptly and test paper of a learner various tools various tools
clearly the in a learning area with and strategies and strategies
learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
parent’s or guardians progress and progress and
progress and
signature and date of achievement to achievement to
achievement to key key
key stakeholders, receipt stakeholders, stakeholders,
including ● Minutes of meetings including including
parents/guardians with key stakeholders parents/guardia parents/guardian
ns, as shown in s, as shown in
. (PPST 5.4.2) (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, the MOV the MOV
CPC) with proof of submitted submitted
attendance
● Report card with
parent’s or guardians
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes Timeliness 3 Showed prompt 3 Showed prompt 3
communication communication
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
of meeting of learners’ of learners’
needs progress needs progress
● Communication with and and
key stakeholders (e.g. achievement achievement
across 2 across 2
parents/guardians, co-
quarters quarters
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a September A reflection/journal entry that Quality 3 Submitted MOV 3 Submitted MOV 3
2022-July highlights the application of a that shows the that shows the
Education Growth and personal 16%
2023 application of a application of a
Services Professional philosophy of learner-centered teaching personal personal
Development teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or philosophy of philosophy of
learner-centered community work teaching that is teaching that is
learner-centered learner-centered
(PPST 7.1.2)

Timeliness 3 Applied a 3 Applied a 3

personal personal
philosophy of philosophy of
teaching that is teaching that is
learner-centered learner-centered
across 2 across 2
quarters quarters

Basic 14. Set September 1. Certification fron the ICT Quality 3 Applied personal 3 Applied personal 3
2022-July philosophy of philosophy of
Education professional Coordinator/School Head/
2023 teaching that is teaching that is
Services development Focal Person incharge e- learner-centered learner-centered
goals based on SAT) across 2 across 2
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP quarters quarters
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF)
Teachers. (PPST 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Efficiency 5 Submitted 4 5 Submitted 4 5
7.5.2) acceptable acceptable
Phase II MOVs MOVs

Timeliness 5 All four (4) 5 All four (4) 5

submitted MOVs submitted MOVs
were were
accomplished accomplished
within the within the
prescribed prescribed
RPMS Phase RPMS Phase

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed September Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4 Communicated 4 Communicated 4
2022-July promptly and promptly and
Education various related
2023 • committee involvement; clearly using clearly using
Services works/activities various tools various tools
that contribute to • involvement as module/ and strategies and strategies
the teaching- learning material learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
writer/validator; progress and progress and
learning process.
achievement to achievement to
• involvement as a resource key key
person/speaker/learning stakeholders, stakeholders,
including including
faciltator in the parents/guardia parents/guardian
RO/SDO/school-initiated TV- ns, as shown in s, as shown in
/radio-based instruction; the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted
• book or journal authorship/
contributorship;
• advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
• participation in demonstration
teaching;
• participation as research
presenter in a forum/
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
conference;
• mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers;
• conducted research within the
rating period;
• others (please specify) with
annotations on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

PATRICIA V. MENDIOLA HANZ ALBRECH B. ABELLA SEGUNDINA C. RAMOS

Master Teacher III Teacher I Principal IV
Rater Ratee Approving Authority