Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Trainon Trauma
Trainon Trauma
renaissance under the role of Viktor Orban in Hungary, especially since 2010?
“In 2010, with a firm and unified stance, we ended the era of transition and found
the path leading to the complete renewal of Hungary.” 1 – said Viktor Orbán in his speech
during the commemoration of the 1848-49 revolution in March 2011. Hungary has been a
place of huge changes and “renewals” during past thirteen years. However, in this essay I
would like to focus mainly on one aspect of those “renewals” - the growth of nationalistic and
reversionistic tendencies, which I claim to be the effect of direct and indirect actions of
Hungarian PM and his party FIDESZ . These tendencies are not new, because organization
called “World Federation of Hungarians” have been claiming for almost three decades to keep
the “remembrance of Trianon” as its main goal. However, during past 13 years, the historical
narrative about the injustice and treachery has started to dominate the official message from
survey of Hungarian Academy of Sciences from 2020, agree that Trianon still hurts, while two
decades before, it seemed that more people have accepted 1920 borders.2 What is more,
commemorations of 100th anniversary of Trianon Treaty in summer 2020, were one of the
biggest in the modern history of Hungary, bigger than these ten or twenty years ago. It shows
that nationalistic and reversionistic tendencies have enormously grown during past years. 3 The
fact that in the Central Europe, which for many centuries was a scene of bloody and long-
lasting wars, is a nation with growing nationalist and revisionist tendencies, does not wish
1
Viktor Orban, “Both 1848 and 2010 brought renewal”, 15 March 2011,
https://2010-2014.kormany.hu/hu/miniszterelnokseg/miniszterelnok/beszedek-publikaciok-interjuk/1848-es-
2010-is-megujulast-hozott, accessed on 10th May 2023
2
Dominik Hejj, „Węgry na nowo. Jak Wiktor Orban zaprogramował nową tożsamość narodową”, Warsaw:
Szczeliny, 2022.
3
Zsuzsanna Szelenyi, „Tainted Democracy: Viktor Orban and the Subversion of Hungary”, (London: C. Hurst &
Co., 2022)
good for its future and that’s why the understanding of this topic is so important in a present-
day Europe.
1. Topic of Trianon Treaty and Greater Hungary under communist rule and in years
1989-2010
2. Social medias used by Viktor Orbán and his ministers as an example of the revisionist
4. Direct and indirect support of far-right groups by FIDESZ that have revisionism and
movements
5. Contact with the Hungarian diaspora – case of dual citizenship and uncontrolled
pre-1920 maps
In my essay, I am going to focus both on primary and secondary sources. From primary
sources, I will use mainly social medias of Viktor Orbán, but also texts of his speeches
(mainly given during national holidays) and also these from parliament. As secondary
sources, I will use mainly books written by former politicians, e.g. Zsuzsanna Szleneyi, or by
- Hejj, Dominik. „Węgry na nowo. Jak Wiktor Orban zaprogramował nową tożsamość
- Orbán, Viktor. “Both 1848 and 2010 brought renewal”, 15 March 2011, https://2010-
2014.kormany.hu/hu/miniszterelnokseg/miniszterelnok/beszedek-publikaciok-