Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amphotericin B Nephrotoxicity - UpToDate
Amphotericin B Nephrotoxicity - UpToDate
Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity
AUTHOR: Mark A Perazella, MD, FACP
SECTION EDITOR: Michael Emmett, MD
DEPUTY EDITOR: Albert Q Lam, MD
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
INTRODUCTION
lower with lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B, as discussed below. (See 'Use of lipid-
based formulations' below.)
● Chronic kidney disease (CKD) at baseline and the severity of the underlying illness also
increase the risk [4,5]. In one series, the incidence of moderate to severe nephrotoxicity
(defined as a doubling of the serum creatinine to a level greater than 2 mg/dL) was 4
percent in patients with no risk factors for AKI and 8 to 29 percent in those with CKD [4].
● The likelihood of kidney disease is also dose dependent, with the risk of kidney function
impairment being low at doses of less than 0.5 mg/kg per day and a cumulative dose of
less than 600 mg [4,5,7].
A prediction rule risk stratified patients based upon the following clinical data available during
the course of therapy: location of care (general medical unit versus intensive care unit),
concurrent use of cyclosporine, and maximum daily amphotericin B dose (<60 mg versus ≥60
mg daily). In the lowest risk group (12 percent of patients), the risk of nephrotoxicity was 4
percent, while in the highest risk group (10 percent of patients), the risk of AKI was 80 percent
[5].
Proximal tubular cells and medullary interstitial cells respond with programmed cell death
when treated with therapeutic doses of amphotericin B. In animal models, the number of
apoptotic tubular cells correlates with the degree of hypokalemia and loss of renal
concentrating ability; administration of insulin-like growth factor-1, an antiapoptotic agent,
prevents hypokalemia and preserves concentrating ability [12]. In addition to this direct
effect, in vitro studies suggest that approximately one-half of the tubular toxicity of
amphotericin B may be mediated by deoxycholate [8-11].
The reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) associated with amphotericin B-induced
tubular toxicity may be mediated in part by the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system
[1,13]. Normally, when sodium chloride delivery to the distal tubule increases, a greater
quantity of sodium chloride enters the macula densa cells located in the early portion of the
distal tubule. This results in activation of a feedback loop (TGF), which triggers afferent
arteriolar vasoconstriction and a fall in GFR [1,13]. Under most circumstances, this TGF
response is physiologically appropriate: high rates of sodium chloride delivery out of the
proximal tubule are restored to near normal levels by the appropriate reduction in GFR, and
this prevents excessive sodium chloride losses in the urine [14]. However, amphotericin B
nephrotoxicity increases the permeability of the macula densa cells. This may inappropriately
activate the TGF system and lead to excessive afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and a fall in
GFR [1,13].
Alternatively, the renal vasoconstriction and fall in GFR may reflect a direct action of
amphotericin B on blood vessels, rather than TGF [15]. In experimental animals,
administration of a calcium channel blocker prevents amphotericin-induced vasoconstriction
and the resultant decline in GFR [16].
In most cases, the serum creatinine increases by no more than 2.5 mg/dL (220 micromol/L)
above baseline [1,4,5,13]. More severe kidney injury due to amphotericin B alone is
uncommon but can occur with diuretic-induced volume depletion or the concurrent
administration of another nephrotoxin.
aminoglycoside or cyclosporine [4,5]. Two other preventive measures are salt loading and the
use of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. In addition, for some fungal infections, non-
amphotericin B agents are now available.
Salt loading — For patients who are going to receive amphotericin B (conventional or lipid-
based formulation) and who are not hypervolemic, we suggest volume expansion with
isotonic fluids (typically isotonic saline) rather than more dilute fluids or no volume expansion
to prevent the development of AKI. In patients who are euvolemic, a total of 500 mL of
isotonic saline is typically given immediately prior to the amphotericin B infusion or divided
before and after amphotericin B administration. Patients who are hypovolemic may require
additional isotonic saline for volume repletion, while those who are hypervolemic should not
receive isotonic saline prior to or after receiving amphotericin B.
The proposed importance of TGF in amphotericin B nephrotoxicity has led to the use of salt
loading since volume expansion has been shown to reduce the sensitivity of the TGF system.
Studies in both humans and animals have shown that saline administration can protect
against or ameliorate the amphotericin B-induced decline in GFR [1,2,13,20] but not the signs
of tubular dysfunction described above [20]. (See 'Pathogenesis of AKI' above.)
The beneficial effect of salt loading was best shown in a controlled study of patients with
mucocutaneous leishmaniasis who received a 10-week course of amphotericin B (average
dose 50 mg per day, given three times per week) [20]. The serum creatinine concentration
was stable with salt loading (1 liter of isotonic saline over the 60 minutes prior to
amphotericin B administration) but rose from 0.6 to 1 mg/dL (53 to 88 micromol/L) in patients
given only water. The minor degree of kidney function impairment in the relatively healthy
control group probably reflects in part the absence of potentiating factors, such as volume
depletion or concurrent aminoglycoside therapy.
However, this benefit of salt loading does not prove that TGF, rather than vasoconstriction, is
the major mechanism underlying the reduced GFR. Increases in the secretion of
vasoconstrictors (angiotensin II and norepinephrine) and decreases in the secretion of the
vasodilator atrial natriuretic peptide might modulate the constrictive effect of amphotericin B
[15]; volume expansion could prevent these hormonal changes.
Data from randomized trials [22-24] and observational studies [25-28] suggest that
administering amphotericin B in a lipid-based formulation can minimize, though not
eliminate, the incidence and severity of nephrotoxicity. The best comparative data are
reported in a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared conventional amphotericin B
with both liposomal amphotericin B (five trials, 1233 patients) and lipid emulsion
amphotericin B (nine trials, 459 patients) [22]. Compared with conventional amphotericin B,
the incidence of nephrotoxicity was reduced with the use of liposomal amphotericin B (15
versus 33 percent) or lipid emulsion amphotericin B (12 versus 31 percent).
The reason why lipid-based formulations are associated with less AKI is incompletely
understood. However, two possibilities have been proposed:
● The liposomal preparation does not contain deoxycholate, which (as noted above) has
direct tubular toxicity [8]. (See 'Pathogenesis of AKI' above.)
Pentoxifylline and sodium bicarbonate have also been employed for prophylaxis without
success [17,34].
Amphotericin B has been associated with the following electrolyte and acid-base disorders:
The loss of magnesium and potassium may also be related in part to the systemic toxicity of
the amphotericin B that causes these intracellular ions to leak into the extracellular fluid
space and then be lost into the urine [2].
The net effect of these changes is that both hypokalemia due to potassium loss and a normal
anion gap metabolic acidosis (ie, a distal RTA) due to hydrogen retention are commonly seen
[2,6,38,40]. Hypomagnesemia, though somewhat less common, is also reported. The distal
RTA generated by amphotericin B, unlike most other forms of distal RTA, is associated with a
normal urine-blood partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) after alkaline loading [43,44].
This likely results from the previously mentioned back-diffusion of secreted hydrogen ions,
but a loss of polarity of the chloride-bicarbonate exchanger is also consistent with this finding
[43].
Amphotericin B may also cause resistance to antidiuretic hormone, leading to polyuria and
polydipsia [2,6,44,45]. (See "Arginine vasopressin resistance (nephrogenic diabetes insipidus):
Clinical manifestations and causes".)
● Prevention – As with acute kidney injury (AKI), the use of liposomal amphotericin B may
help to prevent electrolyte abnormalities and AVP-R [6,46]. In one randomized trial,
• Distal RTA (see "Treatment of distal (type 1) and proximal (type 2) renal tubular
acidosis", section on 'Management of distal RTA')
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Acute kidney injury in
adults" and "Society guideline links: Acute kidney injury in children".)
have reduced but not completely eliminated the risk of nephrotoxicity. (See
'Introduction' above.)
● Electrolyte and acid-base disorders – Amphotericin B can also cause urinary potassium
wasting and hypokalemia, urinary magnesium wasting and hypomagnesemia,
metabolic acidosis due to type 1 (or distal) renal tubular acidosis (RTA), and polyuria due
to arginine vasopressin resistance (AVP-R, previously known as nephrogenic diabetes
insipidus).
• Prevention – As with AKI, the use of liposomal amphotericin B may help to prevent
amphotericin B-associated electrolyte abnormalities and AVP-R. However, these
abnormalities are not ameliorated by volume expansion. Patients without significant
kidney function impairment who are receiving conventional amphotericin B are
generally given daily potassium supplementation to prevent hypokalemia due to
urinary potassium wasting. (See 'Prevention and management' above.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Richard Sterns, MD, who contributed to earlier
versions of this topic review.