Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Comparison Table 25.7.23

    Uploaded by

    Labonna Khan
    2 views1 page
    The document compares and contrasts the key features of public administration in Western, Islamic, and Chinese contexts. Some of the main differences discussed include the role of secular vs religious values, hierarchical structure, the focus on efficiency vs wisdom, and merit-based vs qualifications-based appointment of officials. Overall, the document provides a high-level overview of the core philosophical approaches to public administration across different cultural contexts.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Comparison Table 25.7.23 (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares and contrasts the key features of public administration in Western, Islamic, and Chinese contexts. Some of the main differences discussed include the role of secular vs religious values, hierarchical structure, the focus on efficiency vs wisdom, and merit-based vs qualifications-based appointment of officials. Overall, the document provides a high-level overview of the core philosophical approaches to public administration across different cultural contexts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    2 views1 page

    Comparison Table 25.7.23

    Uploaded by

    Labonna Khan
    The document compares and contrasts the key features of public administration in Western, Islamic, and Chinese contexts. Some of the main differences discussed include the role of secular vs religious values, hierarchical structure, the focus on efficiency vs wisdom, and merit-based vs qualifications-based appointment of officials. Overall, the document provides a high-level overview of the core philosophical approaches to public administration across different cultural contexts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Concept Western Public Islamic PA Chinese PA

    administration
    Feature Secular & legal Religious & moral ethical
    ethos
    Core value Efficiency & Islamic value Virtue
    effectiveness
    Structure Hierarchical Hierarchical Hierarchical/decentralized
    approach
    Aim Sound decision making Wisdom, judgement & Moral self-cultivation &
    & impersonal personal interaction commitment to virtue
    hierarchy
    Hierarchy Rigid Flexible Rigid
    Division of labor Clearly defined Job allocation Job allocation is not clear
    according to expertise according to
    knowledge
    Authority & Legal, living from the Allah fearing, living for Moral, serving the people
    responsibility state the state
    Discipline Obedience to rule of Obedience to Allah Accountability to people
    law
    Degree of Balanced Centralized Centralized/decentralized
    centralization
    Equity Added to recent good Social justice & equity More emphasis on equity
    governance indicators define by Islamic
    norms
    Appointment of Merit based Qualifications & Merit & ethics based
    officials (exception American religious values
    spoil system)
    Characteristics of Transparent, honest & Honest, truthful & Responsible & kind
    officials accountable Allah fearing
    Training Technical & efficiency Islamic education & Moral education &
    technical technical
    Record keeping Written records Written records Written records
    Leadership Traditional, legal Servant & guardian Cultural leadership (
    rational, charismatic, collectivism) ,
    transactional transformational
    Decision making Process oriented Consultative decision Service oriented/ resulted
    guided by law making

    You might also like