Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Connell 2011
Connell 2011
To cite this article: Raewyn Connell (2011) Southern Bodies and Disability: re-thinking concepts, Third World
Quarterly, 32:8, 1369-1381, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.614799
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”)
contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our
licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or
suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are
the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis.
The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever
caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial
or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can
be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Third World Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2011, pp 1369–1381
So wrote the great English poet John Donne. As a priest, Donne was mainly
concerned with his readers’ souls. But his words also apply to their bodies,
and to ours. We are, as embodied beings, ‘part of the main’, profoundly
involved in a larger whole.
In this paper I explore the global scale of this involvement, starting with
fundamental concepts about embodiment, and the location of science in
world society. I then reflect on the changing ways disability is involved with
key processes that have formed world society: colonisation, global capitalism
and patriarchy. Finally, I consider questions about the politics of disability
and impairment on a world scale.
social processes. Every so often there was a fight about which was more
important—‘nature’ vs ‘nurture’—in studies of intelligence or sex roles. But it
was usual for biological determination to be thought more fundamental.
A biomedical paradigm reigned in disability policy, and to a large extent still
does.
The social-constructionist approach to disability that challenged the
biomedical model in the 1980s and 1990s was part of a broad rethinking of
bodies and society. Similar ideas were at work in feminism, sociology, science
and technology studies, cultural studies, public health, sexuality research,
and other fields. Challenges arose to biomedical models of causation, to
ahistorical classifications of bodies, and to professional power over margin-
alised groups. The capacity of social structures and cultural discourses to sort
and define bodies, and to shape bodily experience, was recognised.
Downloaded by [UTSA Libraries] at 07:56 04 October 2014
For scientists working in other parts of the world the centre remains
important. Most take their concepts, methods and problems from the
metropole, many go to the metropole for training or advanced work, and
have careers strongly shaped by their connections with it. This is the situation
called ‘extraversion’ by Hountondji and ‘academic dependency’ by Alatas.11
Usually this is not regarded as problematic. Science is thought to be
universal, so its concepts and methods are supposed to apply everywhere. If
that is the case, where science comes from does not matter. But to an
increasing number of scholars it does matter.12 Science is not something that
exists outside the culture and society that produce it. Theories that arise in
the global metropole are conditioned by the perspectives on the world that
are available in the metropole, in the historical circumstances in which
metropolitan scientists work at the time. For instance, the static, reproduc-
Downloaded by [UTSA Libraries] at 07:56 04 October 2014
Andes, a main source of Spanish royal wealth, was worse than in any of
Engels’ factories.
Global capitalism has replaced such workforces with free labour, but in
circumstances where many are desperate for an income. A ‘race to the
bottom’ in industries that are internationally mobile, such as clothing
and microprocessor assembly, results in minimum wages, long hours and
damaging physical conditions. The maquiladoras of northern Mexico, and
their competitors in Thailand, Vietnam and south China, are well known
examples. The social suffering produced by this form of industrial
development goes beyond problems of industrial health. In northern Mexico,
to give just one case, it includes the appalling brutality of the femicides in
Ciudad Juárez.27
Meanwhile neoliberal regimes, whose logic derives from global competi-
tion, have weakened the unions that might give such workers protection.
They have also weakened, under pressure from the IMF or by local ruling-
class initiative, state-based welfare systems supporting the workers whose
bodies show the consequences. The agenda of neoliberalism, which seeks to
expand the reach of the market and contract the role of the state, is now
felt in all areas of public service. It has affected disability services along
with others, pushing for privatisation, encouraging for-profit services,
emphasising competition, and imposing indirect controls in the name of
accountability.
At a deeper cultural level the capitalist order draws a boundary between
two categories of bodies: those whose labour generates profit, and those
whose labour does not. Of course there have always been differences in the
contributions different people make to social production and consumption.
But in most cultures some contribution is recognised from almost everyone in
the community, old or young, vigorous or not. In capitalism, where value is
defined sharply by the dollar, productivity is a concept that applies only to
workers in the money economy.
This shapes the understanding of disability. Impaired productivity in the
labour market, or exclusion from the labour market, becomes a key way of
defining the disabled. Under workfare regimes that claim to end paternalistic
care and dependence—in fact re-regulating the relation between welfare and
1375
RAEWYN CONNELL
all their intimate contradictions.42 But it also applies on a world scale, where
we have to think about bodies in huge numbers, and about social dynamics
of daunting complexity.
Social sciences and humanities have become a little too preoccupied with
virtual realities, networks and identities. By opening up fresh approaches to
dilemmas of embodiment, disability studies can show the way for other fields.
Disability studies in the metropole contested the medical model, very
powerfully, by prioritising the experience of the disabled. It treated the
people themselves as a source of authority. Doing this on a world scale is, by
itself, a transformative move. New social actors are brought into view, new
questions about the production of disability are raised. Questions of strategy
are thrown into the melting pot.
For instance, an important theme of social scientific work on disability in
the metropole has been the role of the state. The state is a key to the power
of medical models: it has been the provider of services, and has defined or
denied rights. In post-structuralist approaches, perceptions of disability
have been read through the lens of governmentality and normativity.43
In studies of neoliberalism the use of state power has always been in
question.
Issues about disability and the state take a different shape in relation to the
international and the postcolonial state. The UN has been the venue for the
world’s key statements on rights, including rights of the disabled. But UN
action involves unstable coalitions of governments, bureaucracies and NGOs.
In the developing world—given the willingness of local elites to reject human
rights regimes as neocolonial impositions, and of metropolitan powers to ride
over human rights in pursuit of profit and security—it is often NGOs rather
than states that pursue rights agendas. But NGOs, even the most influential
(Oxfam for instance), are constrained by the neoliberal environment from
which they are funded, and are influenced by the professional cultures of the
global North.
Politics among disabled groups is also likely to take different forms in the
global South from those familiar in the global North. This is not only a
matter of different cultures. As I have emphasised above, the history of social
embodiment in the colonised world is different. Contemporary economic
1378
SOUTHERN BODIES AND DISABILITY
But there are also social resources, local care mechanisms, which may have
survived the disruptions of recent history. Village society had its own
brutality, and its own triage, that could result in neglect or infanticide of
disabled children. But it also protected some, and has had a certain resilience.
So have the informal settlements of the new mega-cities. Social resources may
remain—skills, customs, kinship, networks, cultural understandings—on
which disabled people might draw.
Local communities are capable of changing culture and inventing new
strategies. An example is the growing number of working class families
in India who have changed gender divisions of labour as workforce
opportunities for women have emerged. Indigenous social knowledge is
capable of development, and disability politics may find resources here that
are not available from the metropole or from international agencies.
In moving beyond metropole-defined understandings of disability, and
metropolitan models of disability politics, this is one of the most important
points. The colonised and postcolonial world has intellectual resources. It has
ideas, principles, research agendas, art forms and religions that can inform
struggles to overcome marginality, prevent damage, and make the voices of
disabled groups heard (see De Clerck in this issue).
I started with a quotation from a Christian author. I would like to
finish with a Muslim author and an Islamic principle. The author is Ali
Shariati, sociologist and theologian, talking about Islam as a socially engaged
religion:
Islam is a realistic religion and loves nature, power, beauty, wealth, affluence,
progress, and the fulfilment of all human lives. Its Prophet is a man of life,
politics, power, and even beauty. Its book, more than being concerned with
metaphysics and death, speaks about nature, life, world, society and
history . . . It invites people to submit themselves to God, and urges revolt
against oppression, injustice, ignorance and inequality.45
Notes
Particular thanks to John Fisher, Helen Meekosha and Karen Soldatic.
1 World Health Organization, World Report on Disability, Geneva: WHO, 2011.
2 F Haug and others, Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory, London: Verso, 1987; D
Kirk, The Body, Schooling and Culture. Geelong: Deakin University Press, 1993; and K Soldatic &
J Biyanwila, ‘Tsunami and the construction of disabled third world body’, Global South: SEPHIS
e-magazine, 6(3), 2010, pp 75–84.
3 R Shuttleworth, ‘Disability/difference’, in C Ember & M Ember (eds), Encyclopedia of Medical
Anthropology: Health and Illness in the World’s Cultures, New York: Kluwer/Plenum, 2004, pp 360–
373.
4 H Meekosha, ‘Drifting down the Gulf Stream: navigating the cultures of disability studies’, Disability
and Society, 19(7), 2004, p 723.
5 H Meekosha & R Shuttleworth, ‘What’s so ‘‘critical’’ about critical disability studies?’, Australian
Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 2009, pp 47–75; and K Paterson & B Hughes, ‘Disability studies and
phenomenology: the carnal politics of everyday life’, Disability & Society, 14(5), 1999, pp 597–610.
6 N Krieger, ‘Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology’, Journal of Epidemiology and
Downloaded by [UTSA Libraries] at 07:56 04 October 2014
1380
SOUTHERN BODIES AND DISABILITY
28 K Soldatic & H Meekosha, ‘Disability and neoliberal state formations’, in N Watson, C Thomas &
A Roulstone (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, in press.
29 C Waldby & R Mitchell, Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism, Durham,
NC: Duke University Press, 2006.
30 AZ Aizura, ‘Where health and beauty meet: femininity and racialization in Thai cosmetic surgery
clinics’, Asian Studies Review, 33(3), 2009, pp 303–317.
31 M Mies, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour,
London: Zed Books, 1986.
32 R Connell, Gender: In World Perspective, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
33 U Chakravarti, Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens, Calcutta: Stree, 2003.
34 C O’Leary, ‘Fetal alcohol syndrome: diagnosis, epidemiology and developmental outcomes’, Journal of
Pediatrics & Child Health, 40(1–2), 2004, pp 2–7.
35 Quoted in C Frohmader & H Meekosha, ‘Recognition, respect and rights: women with disabilities in a
globalized world’, in D Goodley, B Hughes & L Davis (eds), Disability and Social Theory, London:
Palgrave Macmillan, in press.
36 Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights Violations as Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment: A Critical Human Rights Analysis, New York: Center for
Downloaded by [UTSA Libraries] at 07:56 04 October 2014
Notes on contributor
Raewyn Connell is University Professor at the University of Sydney. A
leading Australian social scientist, she is author of 21 books, including
Southern Theory; Masculinities, Gender & Power; and Confronting Equality.
1381