Unit IG2: Risk assessment

Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).

Important note: You must refer to the document „Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners‟ while
completing all parts of this assessment. Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.

Part 1: Background

You should aim to complete this section in 150 - 200 words.

Topic Comments
Name of organisation* Dalda foods private limited.
Site location* Karachi, Pakistan
Number of workers 1200
Dalda Foods is the leading edible oil and fats company in Pakistan, which is continuously
expanding its line of businesses by making a mark in the dairy, snacks and other food related
categories. The company aims to touch millions of lives daily even in the remotest of areas,
offering products and services to cater to varied consumer needs Their main products are edible
oils, cooking oil and dairy products. During my visit to the plant I observed main activities like
cleaning of the seeds, grinding, pressing and extracting oil from seeds, dosing, filling, processing
of plastic bags for filling, testing activities, work at height and welding activities. The plant was
General description of the organisation being operated on different equipment like pressing machines, cleaning filters, sieving machines,
filling machines, dryers,, evaporators, dosing pumps, motors, blenders, grinders, boilers, plastic
bag production machines, conveyer belt system and power generators.
The plant was working 24/7 and was being operated on 3 rotating shifts of 8 hours. First shift is
from 07:00 am to 03:00 pm, second shift is from 03:00 pm to 11:00 pm while third is from 11:00
pm to 07:00 am. Most of the work force is young here also some women were working in different
sections like admin areas.
I conducted my risk assessment on many section like filling section, grinding and cleaning
Description of the area to be included in the
section, dosing section, blending section, conveyer section, plastic bag production section, dairy
risk assessment product section admin areas, storage area, boiler hall section and maintenance workshops etc.
Any other relevant information HSE manager who reports directly to finance director and all the areas supervisor will be

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 1 of 15

 the most responsible of managing health and safety at plant site.
* If you‟re worried about confidentiality, you can invent a false name and location for your organisation but, all other information provided must be
factual.

You should aim to complete this section in 100 - 200 words.

Note: this section can be completed after you have competed your risk assessment.
Outline how the risk assessment was
carried out this should include:
 sources of information consulted;
 who you spoke to; and
 how you identified:
- the hazards;
- what is already being done; and I read their audits reports, previous inspection reports, ill health data, accident and incident
- any additional controls/actions
that may be required.
Before the completion of my risk assessment task I studied the ig2 book of RRC international. I
studied all the requirements of completing risk assessment task from this book like hazard
identification, control measures and additional control measures. I also visited some of the
websites of international labour organization (ILO) and some UK based websites which gave me
too much knowledge about the health and safety of processing plants.
https://www.hse.gov.uk/toolbox/machinery/index.htm
https://www.ilo.org/safework/info/standards-and-instruments/codes/WCMS_218458/lang--
en/index.htm
After that I visited all the premises and talked to workers and supervisors about their health and
safety related issues. They all had a great understanding of the health and safety of the plant and
they knew much about the existing hazards and their control measures that were put in place.
Then I have consulted with company's HSE Manager for health and safety related issues in plant.
reports to see what types of accidents had occurred over the last 12 months. I also checked the
reasons for sick absence and analysis work process. From all the above mentioned sources and
records I observed many existing hazards of the workplace and their control measures, after that I
suggested some further control measures for which I referred back to the notes and finding that I
have made during my visit to the site. For the careful consideration of further control measures, I
also referred some of the HSE notes like for work at height hazard I referred
https://www.cidb.mu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/5.-OSH-Work-at-Height-Regulations-2013.pdf

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 2 of 15

 Part 2: Risk Assessment

Organisation name: Dalda foods private limited.

Date of assessment: 29th November 2021
Scope of risk assessment: filling section, grinding and cleaning section, dosing section, blending section, conveyer section, plastic bag production
section, dairy product section admin areas, storage area, boiler hall section and maintenance workshops etc.
Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Work The workers working near Instruction on healthy working 1. Install tripping devices on 2 months Finance
equipment and filler wheel machines can methods was offered to the conveyer belt system. director
machinery get harmed. workers 2. Provide robust gloves and tight (2 3)
The workers were Safety operating procedures clothing to the workers. 1 week
HSE
Safety guard working with the conveyer were developed. 3. A fixed safety guard must be
1 month supervisor ( 4
around the machines can get installed on the rotating parts of 5)
rotating parts of entangled with the the conveyer belt systems.
the conveyer belt rotating parts of the 4. Monitoring and supervision 1 week Area
system was machines while working must be taking into account. supervisor
missing. on it and can have many 5. Provide refresher training to (4)
injuries like cuts, bruises the workers on safe working 3 days
and bone fracture etc. he procedures.
can also lose his finger.

Slips and trips All the workers of the Safety warning signs were 1. Slip resistant matts must be 2 weeks Finance
diary section can be placed at the area. installed. director
Slipper floor in harmed. 2. Floor must be cleaned 1 day (1 3)
the diary product The workers can get immediately.
section and slipped due to the slippery 3. Personal protective equipment 3 days
HSE
obstructed condition of the floor while like safety shoes and gloves supervisor

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 3 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
walkways of the moving on the floor and must be provided to the (24)
bottled section can tripped due to the workers.
obstructed walkways as 4. Remove all the scattered 1 week Maintenance
some material like empty boxes and other material from in-charge
(5)
boxes were placed in the floor of the bottled section.
Area
bottled section. Due to 5. Maintenance of all the supervisor
which workers can have pipelines of the water treatment 1 week (2 4 5)
many injuries like internal section to avoid leakage
and external injuries,
bruises and head injuries
etc.
Noise All the workers, Silencers were installed on 1. Install sound proof enclosure 1 month Finance
supervisor and engineers different machines. and acoustic shielding around director
can get harmed. Maintenance of different noise the machinery. (1 2 3)
Excessive noise The exposure to producing machines. 2. Total enclosure of the noise 1 month
HSE
during different excessive noise is always producing machines
supervisor
machinery like dangerous. Some 3. Provide ear defenders and 1 week (4)
motors, machines were producing make mandatory to wear them. Plant
conveyers, excessive noise due to 4. Give training and supervision 1 week manager(5)
grinding which the workers were to the workers.
machines. exposed to it for a long 5. Place the stationary noise
period of time. The sources as far as possible from 1 month
workers can get many noise sensitive receivers.
hearing problems like
tinnitus, NIHL and
persistent ringing in the
ears etc.

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 4 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Fire All the workers of the Safety warning signs were 1. Safe and well-ventilated area 2 week
plant can get harmed. placed. must be designed for welding
Welding activity A welder was doing Fire fighting equipment like fire work. HSE
in the welding activity in the extinguisher was placed at the 2. Stop the welding work supervisor
1 day (1 2 3 4 5 6)
maintenance maintenance workshop area. immediately and give the tool
workshop near and there were empty box talk. Area
combustible sacks and card boards 3. Apply permit to work system on 1 month supervisor
material and too due to which there all hot work activities, (1 2 4 6)
without the fire were chances that 4. Remove combustible material. 1 day
watcher Any spark from the 5. Provide refresher training to
welding activity can get the worker. 1 week
contact with unattended 6. Fire watcher must be there with
combustible material the welder to assist him 1 week
behind him and a fire can
happen due to which the
workers can get many
burn injuries,
asphyxiation, cardiac
arrest and death also.
Ergonomics All the workers that are Daily supervision by the 1. If applicable, include eyesight 1 month Finance
working on DSE systems supervisor on a regular basis. checks and spectacles. director
Continuous work can get harmed. There were routine of pan work 2. Ergonomic risk assessment of (1 6)
on computers in Continuous work on DSE and regular delays. the work station must be 1 month
HSE
admin areas / system can lead to many conducted.
supervisor
non adjusting physical problems in the 3. For such staff, walking and 1 week (2 3 4 5)
chairs workers like the workers light exercise is beneficial and
can get WRULD, back should be recommended. Area
pain, eye strain and the 4. Proper rest breaks and job supervisor
workers can also get rotation must be given to the 2 week (2 3 4)
stress due to the workers.
continuous work on DSE 5. Provide training to workers on
systems. risk and precautions 1 week

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 5 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
6. Ergonomically designed work
stations must be provide to the 3 weeks
workers

Manual The workers that are They were given all kind of 1. Workers must be provided 1 week Finance
handling involved in manual welfare facilities like water proper manual lifting director
handling of the heavy facility, rest brakes etc. techniques training. (2 5)
Shifting of the pets can get harmed. Monitoring on regular basis by 2. Instead of manual handling,
1 week
heavy packages Repeatedly posture of the manager. trolley must be used for
HSE
of the products to lifting the heavy packaged packaged products supervisor
the storage area product and placing on 3. Perform manual handling risk 1 week (1 3 4 )
by manually. the on the floor of the assessment.
storage area can lead to 4. Ensure that individual Area
many physical problems capabilities are matched to the 1 day supervisor
in the workers. The activity. (1 4 )
workers can get WRULD, 5. Energy booster drinks must be
internal and external provided to the workers. 3 days
injuries, back pain,
muscle stretchiness etc.
Health, welfare All the workers of the N/A 1. Replace the chairs and table of 1 month Finance
and work plant can get harmed. the dining halls. director
environment. 2. Implement a cleaning (1 3 4)
The chairs and table of programme in the dining halls. 2 weeks
Condition of the the dining hall were kept 3. Provide workers with large
HSE
chairs and tables dirty and unhygienic due number of the washing 2 weeks supervisor
of the dining hall to which any outbreak of facilities. (2 4 5)
was unhygienic. the virus or disease can 4. Health screening of the 1 month
And there were be happened and the workers must be done. Activity
less washing workers can get many 5. Proper housekeeping of the 1 week supervisor
facility also diseases like food dining halls. ( 2 5)

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 6 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
poisoning and hepatitis
etc.

Confined space All the maintenance The workers was given 1. All the confined space 2 weeks HR manager
workers that are involved respiratory protective activities must be under (5)
Maintenance in maintenance work of equipment permit to work system.
work was being the storage tank. 2. Gas testing must be done 1 day HSE
supervisor
done storage The maintenance worker before entry.
(1 2 3 4)
tank that has entered in the 3. Cleaning of the storage tank 1 day
tank can get contact with must be done before entry.
toxic material in the 4. The worker must be trained Activity
confined space and get and give him supervision and 5 days supervisor
skin irritation and instruction. ( 1 2 3 4 5)
dermatitis and the due to 5. Hole watcher must be there
low level of oxygen he with maintenance workers. 5 days
can be asphyxiation.
Movement of The workers that are Training are conducted for safe 1. Conduct defensive driving 1 week Finance
people and working around the heavy movement of vehicles and trainings. director
vehicles in the loader trucks can be pedestrians. 2. Stop vehicles and conduct (5)
workplace harmed. local TBT to drivers. 1 day
HSE
A driver was reversing the Speed limit is set. 3. Mark routes with paint for
2 week Supervisor
Reversing of the heavy loader truck in the pedestrians & vehicles. (1 2 3 )
loader truck workers area and 4. Hire a banskman for the 1 week
without the banksmen was not reversing activities HR manager
usage of assisting him 5. Segregate routes of entry for (4)
banksmen. The loaders trucks can pedestrians and vehicles. 1 month
get collide with the
workers while reversing
and the workers can get

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 7 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
many injuries from this
collision like cuts, bruises,
sprains and bone fracture
etc.

Work at height. The workers working at The area was barricaded. 1. Fixed ladder or mobile bridge 1 month Finance
height can be harmed. The equipment was isolated. must be purchased and used director
Maintenance The workers working on Safety signs and warning signs for work ate height activities (1 6)
work on some of the top of the machines were installed. 2. Mobile bridge must be
1 month
the machines without using fixed ladder inspected on monthly basis.
HSE
without using can get fallen on the floor 3. Safe access and anchor points 1 day supervisor
fixed ladder due to the inadequate must be decide before work at (2 3 4 5)
movement of the ladder. height.
Movement of the ladder is 4. Information, instruction and
dangerous for the workers training must be provided to 1 week Activity
and the workers can get the workers supervisor
many injuries after getting 5. All the work at height activities (2 3 4)
fallen on the floor like must be under permit to work 1 month
internal and external system.
injuries, head injuries and 6. Provide full body harness to
1 week
bone fracture etc. the workers before work at
height activity.

Health, welfare The workers working in Fresh water facility was 1. The worker must be given heat 1 week Finance
and work the boiler halls can be available to the workers. retardant clothing and the director
environment harmed. PPE,S (1 2 3 4 5)
2. The workers must be given 2 week
Extreme The workers were energy booster drinks.
HSE
temperature in working in boiler hall and 3. The workers must be given rest 2 week supervisor
the boiler hall. they were exposed to break and job rotation. (3)
extreme temperature due 4. The workers must be provided 2 month

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 8 of 15

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescales for
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
to which they can get with the cooling shelters.
many health related 5. Cooling fans must be installed 1 month
problems like they can get at different spots.
heat stroke, dehydration
and heat burns.
Work Workers who are working Emergency stop buttons were 1. The workers must be provided 1 week
equipment and on machine might get installed on the machines. with robust gloves and other Finance
machinery harmed. safety operating procedures PPE‟S. director
The sharp rotating parts were developed 2. The adjustable guard must be 1 month (1 2 5 )
Safety guard on of the filling machines installed on the sharp rotating
filler machine were naked it has no parts of the filler machine to HSE
was missing safety guard installed on it secure the workers hand. supervisor
and workers have easy 3. Two hand controls should be 2 months (4 )
access to them While applied to secure operators'
working on the these hands, HSE manager
machine the workers can 4. Provide refresher training to 1 week (3)
get contact with the sharp the workers on safe working
rotating of the machines procedures while working with
and the workers can get machine.
many injuries like cuts, 5. Tripping devices must be 1 week
bruises, damage to body installed where possible.
part and bone fracture
can also happen.

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 9 of 15

Part 3: Prioritise 3 actions with justification for the selection
Suggested word counts
Moral, general legal and financial arguments for all actions: 300 to 350 words
For EACH action:
Specific legal arguments: 100 to 150 words
Likelihood AND severity: 75 to 150 words
How effective the action is likely to be in controlling the risk: 100 to 150 words

Moral, general legal and financial arguments for ALL actions

Moral, general legal and financial Moral arguments

arguments
To ensure that employees can work in a safe environment on their workplace the organization has
moral obligation to protect all employees from risk present at their workplace. Workers have only
come to the premises of the employer for earning but also for the progress and prosperity of the
employer. If the workers are injured or killed by accident at workplace of the employer it is
intolerable for our civilized society. So, employer is morally responsible to have a safe system of
work at his workplace. He should be responsible to provide all type of personal protective
equipment and machinery, safe machinery and safe equipment to his employees.
Financial arguments;
The employer will have to bear many expenditures when an accident occurs at any workplace and
that cost can be broken these kinds of costs, like cost associated with loss of time, accident
investigation and money, cost associated with recruiting new staff and training, disruption and loss
of future orders and business. Injuries of workers (medical cost, lost working time, sick pay without
working hours, low morale of workers, replacement worker wages which will be a reason to reduced
productivity and cost associated with loss of medical treatment of the injured worker. Organization
might face repair and replace equipment and infrastructure costs and repair of damaged
equipment. Organization can also bear cost associated with enforcement actions like fines from
enforcement authorities. So the employer should create safe system of work in the work place, so
that the workers working in the areas cannot get harm and the employer could not face the cost
associated the accident.
Legal arguments;

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 10 of 15

 International labour organization has put some legal duties on every employer according to the
convention c155.This organization must comply with legal laws and regulations. It is necessary for
all the organizations to imply legal practices. International bodies and agencies have set some
rules, if organization fails to achieve those standards, then enforcement agencies can take further
actions. At first, they inform the organization through general notice after that they take further legal
steps. They can stop the work which can harm the employees. After making certain improvements
or taking respective control measure in order to make the risk factor low enforcement authorities
can also demand to start the working. In case of any severe accident overseeing chief can be
imprisoned and firm license can be terminated.

Justification for action 1

Install sound proof enclosure and acoustic shielding around the machinery. (noise)
Action

Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
International labour organization has made many convention and recommendation for the employer
to protect their workers from the noise hazards. Every organisation is fully bounded to these
conventions and recommendations. As mentioned below
C148 - Working Environment (Air Pollution, Noise and Vibration) Convention, 1977 (No. 148).
States that National laws or regulations shall prescribe that measures be taken for the prevention
and control of, and protection against, occupational hazards in the working environment due to air
pollution, noise and vibration.
https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C148
The likelihood associated with this hazard will be considered as high because the workers were
working in the noisy areas for a long period of time and they were exposed to high pitch noise
generated from the machines like conveyers and grinding machines so there were many chances
for the workers to get many health problems related to the noise hazard. The current control
measures were also ineffective to protect the workers from getting harm.
When considering the severity, I set 4 categories:
 minimal: no injury or damage occurred
 minor: injury requiring first-aid and/or slight damage caused to plant/equipment/buildings
 major: injury requiring hospital treatment/stay and/or significant damage
caused to plant/equipment/buildings
 Catastrophic: death and/or irreparable damage to
plant/equipment/buildings

Learner number: 00644737 Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 11 of 15


How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 2
Action
Specific legal arguments
Learner number: 00644737
The severity factor will be considered from the above mentioned table as major because after a
long period of time exposure to noise the workers will get health problems like tinnitus and NIHL
which will require proper hospital treatment.
The risk associated with this hazard will be fully minimised by installing sound proof enclosure and
acoustic shielding around the machinery. This control measure will minimise the noise level of the
workplace and the workers will now be less exposed to noise and hence the overall risk associated
with this hazard will also be minimised. This control action will have major impact on finance saving
also because the cost of implementing this control action will be less than the cost associated with
harm of the workers.
I have suggested a time period of 1 month for the implementation of this control action because it
will take some time to make arrangements and to get approval from the managing director
I think this control action will control maximum of the risk associated with this hazard with some
other control actions that are mentioned in the risk assessment section
Fixed ladder or mobile bridge must be purchased and used for work ate height activities (work at
height)
International labour organization has set many conventions and recommendation for the hazard
related to work at height activities and every organization is fully bounded to comply with these
conventions and recommendations.
ILO Convention 1988 (C167, Article 14) (Work at height) states that Where work cannot safely
be done on or from the ground or from part of a building or other permanent structure, a safe and
suitable scaffold shall be provided and maintained, or other equally safe and suitable provision shall
be made .In the absence of alternative safe means of access to elevated working places, suitable
and sound ladders shall be provided. They shall be property secured against inadvertent
movement. All scaffolds and ladders shall be constructed and used in accordance with national
laws and regulations. Scaffolds shall be inspected by a competent person in such cases and at
such times as shall be prescribed by national laws or regulations.
https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C167
Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 12 of 15
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 3
Action
Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
Learner number: 00644737
The likelihood associated with this hazard will be considered as high because some maintenance
workers were using moveable ladder for maintenance work which have inadequate movement due
to which there were many chances for the workers to get fall on the floor and worker can have
many injuries like head injuries, internal and external injuries and bone fracture etc. The current
control measures were also ineffective to protect the workers from getting harm.
The severity factor associate with this hazard will be considered from the above mentioned table in
justification action 1 as major because if the workers get injuries like internal and external injuries
and head injuries and bone fracture they will require proper hospital treatment .
The risk associated with this hazard will be minimised by purchasing and fixing all the work at
height activities on only fixed ladder or mobile working plate form , this action will eliminate the
inadequate movement and hence the overall chances of getting fallen on the floor will be minimised
This control action will have major impact on finance saving also because the cost of implementing
this control action will be less than the cost associated with harm of the workers.
I have suggested a time period of 1 month for the implementation of this control action because it
will take some time to make arrangements and to get approval from the managing director
I think this control action will control maximum of the risk associated with this hazard with some
other control actions that are mentioned in the risk assessment section.
The adjustable guard must be installed on the sharp rotating parts of the filler machine to secure
the workers hand. (work equipment and machinery)
The International labour organization (ILO) has set many conventions and recommendations to
develop the safe working environment at workplace and managing risk associated with work
equipment and machineries, as given below
C119 - Guarding of Machinery Convention, 1963 (No. 119),
“The use of machinery any dangerous part of which, including the point of operation, is without
appropriate guards shall be prohibited by national laws or regulations or prevented by other equally
effective measures: Provided that where this prohibition cannot fully apply without preventing the
use of the machinery it shall apply to the extent that the use of the machinery permits”.
https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C119
The likelihood associated with this hazard will be considered as high because rotating parts of the
filling machines were naked and easy access to the workers due to which there were many
Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 13 of 15

How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Part 4: Review, communicate and check
Suggested word counts for each section:
 Planned review date or period and reasoning for this: 50 - 100 words
 How the risk assessment findings will be communicated and who needs to know the information: 100 - 150 words
 Follow up on the risk assessment: 100 - 150 words.
Planned review date/period with
reasoning
How the risk assessment findings will be
communicated AND who you need to tell
Learner number: 00644737
chances for the workers to contact with these parts of the machines and they can be trapped in
between the parts also. The overall current control measures were also ineffective to protect the
workers against harm.
The severity associated with this hazard will be considered from the above mentioned table in
justification action 1 as major because the workers can get injuries like cuts, bruises and damaged
body part which will require proper hospital treatment
The risk associated with this hazard will be minimised by installing adjustable guard must be
installed on the sharp rotating parts of the filler machine to secure the workers hand. The safety
guards will give protection to the worker‟s hand from getting contact with the moving parts of the
filling machines and hence the overall risk associated with this hazard will be minimised. This action
will also have a major impact on finance saving because the cost of implementation of this action
will be less than that of the cost associated with the injury or harm of the workers
I have given a time period of 1 month for the completion of the risk assessment as time will take for
HSE engineer to take approval from the managing director for the implementation for this control
action.
This action will control maximum risk associated with this hazard with some other control actions
that are mentioned in the risk assessment section.
Review date was set for 29th November 2022 because it‟s necessary for the risk assessments to be
reviewed yearly to get improvement continuously and to keep it up-to-date to comply with legal
standards. I also ensured that company will must review its risk assessment if there is any change
in equipment, any change in number of workers or change in process etc.
A meeting will be arranged with the finance director and managing director to go through and agree
on the urgent actions and control measures of the risk assessment. I would highlight the importance
of these control actions and I would also highlight that these actions would save the large amount in
various forms such as for sick-pay, medical treatment, repairing and replacing damaged building
etc. My finding will be shared on all level of the organisation and I will make a presentation on all
the findings of my risk assessment to present it in front of all the technical staff, workers, operators,
Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 14 of 15

How you will follow up on the risk
assessment to check that the actions
have been carried out
Learner number: 00644737
HSE supervisor and plant manager to alert from the hazard present there. A request will also be
made to display these findings on the notice boards and also sent via email to all the staff.
I would set the time frame for reminder of each control measure before the deadline. To check the
progress of each control measure at the workplace I will visit the workplace and will have a talk with
the supervisor or the manager to know about the progress of each control measure. On the
implementation of these actions If found any negligence, then I will find the exact reason of this
unsafe behaviour. I will discuss this problem with the higher management to resolve this problem as
soon as possible. I will also make a request to appoint the highly experienced team for the
implementation of these control measures and allocate the budget that would be enough for the
implementation of these actions.
Learner name: Taimur Kamal Page 15 of 15