Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. Ed. 73 Syllabus
Prof. Ed. 73 Syllabus
Prof. Ed. 73 Syllabus
VISION
A university that produces quality graduates who are academically competitive, globally responsive and locally sustained.
MISSION
We are committed to be agents in the development of Abra through enhanced instruction, creative and innovative researches and projects for public and
community services towards globally competitive professionals who contribute to the realization of a nation that enjoys strongly rooted comfortable and
secure life.
CORE VALUES
1
COLLEGES OF TEACHER EDUCATION
Teacher Education Department
2
Across the Curriculum
Prof. Ed. 72: Technology for Teaching and Learning 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 73: Assessment in Learning 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 74: Assessment in Learning 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 75: Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 80: Field Study 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 90: Field Study 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Prof. Ed. 100: Teaching Internship 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Legend:
Cre Creativity PS Problem Solving CT Critical Thinking DML Decision Making & Learning
Com Communication Col Collaboration ICT information and Communication Technology
IL information Literacy Cit Citizenship LC Life and Career PSR personal and Social Responsibility
Legend:
Cre Creativity PS Problem Solving CT Critical Thinking DML Decision Making & Learning
Com Communication Col Collaboration ICT information and Communication Technology
IL information Literacy Cit Citizenship LC Life and Career PSR personal and Social Responsibility
3
Liminal Period (MIDTERM) UNIT 1:CLASSROOM ORIENTATION AND VMGO
Essential Learning
Week Content Standards Declarative Knowledge Functional Knowledge Intended Learning Outcomes Suggested Assessment Tasks
(ILO) Teaching/Learning (ATs)
Students should be able to: Activities (TLAs)
1 Demonstrate awareness Classroom Orientation VGMO Recite the VMGO, understanding Teaching/Learning Activities Oral Recitation
and understanding of Grading system the grading system, Course Discussion
the institutional VMGO, Course description description and requirements Group collaboration/
the grading system, the and Requirements Brainstorming
course coverage and its Expository essay writing
nature and requirements
Input Material/Resources
Student handbook
Output Materials
Essay on pledge of obedience
4
assessment to Common Identify and discuss the
teaching and learning Terminologies types of measurement,
evaluation and test
Identify the principles of
high quality assessment
Discuss the three levels of
learning domains
Get familiarize with the
Principles of High different traditional
Quality assessment methods
Assessment Explain the properties of
assessment methods
5
constructively Determine and discuss the
aligned with different assessments
national conducted in the K to 12
standards BEC
Discuss the K to Compare and construct
12 assessment the K to 12 assessment
guidelines guidelines
Liminal Period (FINALTERM) Unit 4: ASSESSMENT TOOLS DEVELOPMENT
Essential Learning
Week Content Standards Declarative Knowledge Functional Knowledge Intended Learning Outcomes Suggested Assessment Tasks
(ILO) Teaching/Learning (ATs)
Students should be able to: Activities (TLAs)
10 - 14 Discuss the steps Assessment Tools Planning a Test and Explain the steps in Teaching/Learning Activities Constructing
in planning a test Development Construction of Table planning of a test Modular Approach objective type tests
Identify the of Specifications Identify the parts of TOS Lecture-Discussion and TOS
different types Constructing a True- Construct a hypothetical Brainstorming
of objective tests False Tests TOS Group Discussion
Construct a Constructing a Multiple Determine and explain the Library/online research Critiquing samples
hypothetical Choice Tests rules in constructing a Critiquing objective type tests
Table of Constructing a True-False Test
Specifications Matching Type Tests Construct a True-False Input Material/Resources
Construct paper Constructing Other Test Module 3
and pencil tests Creative Assessment Determine the guidelines
in accordance Tools in constructing a multiple- Output Materials
with the choice test Developed objective type test
guidelines in test with Table of Specifications
Construct a 10-item
construct multiple-choice test
Determine the guidelines
in constructing a
Matching Type Test
Construct a matching type
test
Identify and explain the
guidelines/rules in the
construction of other
6
creative assessment tools
Construct samples of
these types of tests
Liminal Period (FINALTERM) UNIT 5: GRADING SYSTEMS
Essential Learning
Week Content Standards Declarative Knowledge Functional Knowledge Intended Learning Outcomes Suggested Assessment Tasks
(ILO) Teaching/Learning (ATs)
Students should be able to: Activities (TLAs)
15-16 Familirize with Grading System What is Grading Identify the types of Teaching/Learning Activities Developing a word
the different System? grading system used in the Modular Approach cloud
types of grading K to 12 Grading country Lecture-Discussion
systems System Distinguish between Group Discussion Creating a sample
Compute norm-referenced and temporary
grades of criterion-referenced Input Material/Resources progress report
students in grading; cumulative and Module 4 card
various grade averaging grading system
levels Familiarize with the Output Materials Computing a
observing the ASIST grading system Sample Temporary Progress sample grades of
DepEd Familiarize with the Report Card students
DepEd K to 12 Grading Developed Word Cloud for
guidelines
System Assessment in Learning 1
Differentiate the three
components of summative
assessments
Compute grades of
students observing the
guidelines
7
BS Bloom (2006). Learning Domains or Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved from
https://users.manchester.edu/student/gjtribbett/webpage/bloom's%20taxonomies.pdf
Earl, Lorna (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. Retrieved from
http://web.uvic.ca/~thopper/iweb09/GillPaul/Site/Assessment_and files/Assessment.pdf
realizations in the Evaluating
Elcomblus (2017). Appropriateness of Assessment Methods. course Retrieved from https://www.elcomblus.com/appropriateness-of-
Input Material/Resources students’ outputs
assessment-methods-2/ Module 1 – 4/e-portfolio
McMillan, James H. (1999). Establishing High Quality Classroom Assessments. Retrieved from
Basic Readings https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429146.pdf Output Materials
Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G. & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning 1 (3 rd Edition). Developed e-portfolio
Lorimar Publishing, Inc. 776 Aurora
Blvd., cor. Boston Street, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila.
Sandra Ozola (2014). Views on Taxonomy and Learning. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
Course Outline doi=10.1.1.903.1962&rep=rep1&type=pdf Teaching Strategies Assessment/Evaluation
1. Classroom Orientation and VGMO Online Class,
Santos, R. G. (2007). Assessment ofLecture-Discussion,
Learning 1. LorimarBrainstorming, Group
Publishing, Inc. 776 AuroraOral Recitation
Blvd., cor. Boston Street, Cubao, Quezon City,
Metro Manila. Discussion
2. Basic Concepts of Assessment Modular/Virtual, Lecture-Discussion, Brainstorming, Group Practical Test; Activity Output; Write-up
Discussion, Interview, observation
DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2017. Policy Guidelines on System Assessment in the K to 12 Basic Education Program. Accessed online:
3. Assessing the Student Learning Outcomes Modular/Virtual, Lecture-Discussion, interview, Group
https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DO_s2017_029.pdf Practical Test; Activity Output; Write-up; Instructor
DepEd Order No. 31, s.Discussion,
2020. Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Grading in Light of Evaluation
the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan.
Accessed online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DO_s2020_031.pdf
4. Assessment Tools Development DepEd Order No. 55, Modular/Virtual, Lecture-Discussion,
s. 2016. Policy Guidelines Group Discussion,
on the National Practical
Assessment of Student Test; Activity
Learning Output;
for the K to 12 Write-up; Instructor
Basic Education
Critiquing Evaluation
Program. Accessed online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DO_s2016_55-3.pdf
Duka, C. D. (2014). Reviewer for the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET). Manila Review Institute, Inc. 3/F Consuelo Building
5. Grading Systems 929 Nicanor Reyes St. Modular/Virtual,
(formerly Morayta),Lecture-Discussion,
Manila. Brainstorming Practical Test; Activity Output; Write-up; Instructor
Gonzales, Cathrine (2020). DepEd: Guidelines for streamlined K to 12 curriculum Evaluationnow available online. Retrieved at
Extended Readings
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1291914/deped-guidelines-for-streamlined-k-to-12-curriculum-now-available-online
6. Portfolio Making K to 12 Curriculum Guides Modular/Virtual, Group Discussion, Post-conference Self, Peer, and Instructor Evaluation
K to 12 Most Essential Learning Competencies
MET- Review Center (2006). LET Reviewer Lecture and Exercises (General and Professional Education). G/F Paseo del Colegio Bldg,
S.H. Loyola Street Sampaloc, Manila..
Mhairi McAlpine, 2002. Robert Clark Centre for Technological Education, University of Glasgow. Retrieved from
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.137.3942& rep=rep1&type=pdf)
Talledo, M. R. B. (2021). Module in Prof. Ed. 73 – Assessment in Learning 1. Abra State Institute of Sciences and Technology,
Lagangilang, Abra.
Course Assessment To be discussed by the Committee on Grading System
Written Outputs……………………………… 30 %
Performance Tasks…………………………… 40 %
Attendance…………………………………… 5 %
Term Examination…………………………… 25 %
TOTAL 100%
Course Policies Medium of Instruction: The medium of instruction is English. In the teaching and learning presentation, however, the use of Iloko is
encouraged only if needed to exemplify an activity/report in this course. 8
Committee Members
-
Approved: