Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14 Optical Activity and The Structure of Macromolecules: F. Ciardelli
14 Optical Activity and The Structure of Macromolecules: F. Ciardelli
THE STRUCTURE OF
MACROMOLECULES
F. CIARDELLI
Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Italy and
CNR, Center for Stereordered and Optically Active Macromolecules, Pisa, Italy
O. PIERONI
Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Italy and
CNR, Institute of Biophysics, Pisa, Italy
and
A. FISSI
CNR, Institute of Biophysics, Pisa, Italy
14.1 INTRODUCTION
14.1.1 ORIGIN OF OPTICAL ACTIVITY IN
MACROMOLECULES
As in low molecular weight compounds, optical activity can be observed only in
chiral macromolecules, that is, macromolecules for which all allowed conforma-
tions lack reflection symmetry elements.
The identification of chiral macromolecules differs from that of low molecular
weight molecules because of the substantially linear structure along the chain
backbone. Accordingly, analysis of the symmetry properties has been carried out
on the basis of three different models: (i) the infinite length chain; (ii) the finite
length chain with equal end groups; and (iii) the finite length chain with different
end groups. Point symmetry valid for molecules having definite and 'discrete'
dimensions in all directions can be used only for the last two models, whereas
linear symmetry must be used for the first model, which implies an infinite
dimension [I]. In linear symmetry, in contrast to point symmetry, the new
symmetry operation 'translation' and the new symmetry element 'translation
axis' are introduced. The analysis for aflexiblemacromolecule, which can assume
an extremely large number of conformations, is conveniently carried out on the
most symmetric of these conformations, which is usually the 'planar zigzag'. The
Polymer Spectroscopy. Edited by Allan H. Fawcctt
© 19% John Wiley & Sons Ltd
analysis of the derived Fischer projection of an infinite chain indicates that this is
chiral when a symmetry plane containing the chain, those perpendicular to the
chain and that with translation containing the chain are all lacking [ I ] . For finite
length chains, chirality is guaranteed by lack of symmetry in the plane containing
the chain and the plane perpendicular to the chain at its central point [I].
Thus, in vinyl polymers, only atactic macromolecules can be chiral in the first
model with infinite length chain. The atactic and the syndiotactic macro-
molecules with an even number of monomer residues are chiral in the finite chain
model with identical end groups, whereas all isotactic, syndiotactic and atactic
chains have a chiral structure for the last model with different end groups [1,2].
Even in vinyl polymers consisting of chiral macromolecules, extremely low or
vanishing optical rotation can be predicted when the molecular weight is high,
even if a complete separation of the enantiomeric pair were to be possible. Indeed,
in vinyl polymers every stereogenic carbon atom is flanked by two CH 2 groups,
and its chirality arises only from the different lengths of the two chain sections
attached to it. Thus an appreciable contribution to chiroptical properties is
conceivable only for asymmetric centers close to the chain ends, the concentra-
tion of which decreases with increasing molecular weight. The same holds for
conformational optical activity referred to the presence of secondary structures,
involving the macromolecule as whole or a substantial fraction of it, with
a predominant handedness. This last is not attributable simply to stereogenic
centers (asymmetric centers) with a single absolute configuration in each repeat-
ing unit.
Indeed, the existence of purely conformational optical activity is not a unique
macromolecular requisite, being Well known in low molecular weight atro-
pisomerism. However, in polymers it assumes a very specific characteristic
connected with the occurrence of cooperative effects which allow transmittance
of molecular asymmetry along the chain to very long distances [3].
Most isotactic vinyl polymers assume helical conformations in the crystalline
state [4], but owing to the substantial achirality of the macromolecules both
screw senses are found in the lattice cells in equal amounts. This is even more true
in a melt or in solution, where left-handed and right-handed helical sections
alternate even within the same macromolecular chain. Certainly, an appreciable
optical rotation would be observed in the crystalline state provided that crystalli-
zation occurred under a chiral field inducing a single screw sense helicity in all
chains. Such an optical rotation would promptly be lost on melting or dissolution,
as an immediate equilibration between the two opposite helical senses would occur.
Isotactic macromolecules derived from achiral monomers have no preference
for right- or left-handed screw senses, and the two are perfectly balanced at inter-
and intramolecular level. However, distribution of left- and right-handed helical
secondary structures affects markedly the free energy of the system, alternation of
the two senses in the same chain being favored for entropic reasons [4,5]. If this
last situation takes place, conformational optical activity cannot be obtained
because of intramolecular conformational compensation, which hinders any
isolation of chains with a predominant handedness.
The above considerations are described in fuller detail in previous papers [6,7]
and indicate that macromolecules assuming a single chirality conformation can
show chiroptical properties characteristic of the conformation itself. Moreover, if
chromophores are present in the side chains specific chiroptical properties can
arise from dipole-dipole electronic interactions among these chromophores
disposed along the chirally arranged backbone. This situation is clearly shown in
poly-a-amino acids, in which specific and typical chiroptical properties are
associated with specific and typical conformations (a-helix, /?-structures, random
coil) [8].
In order to make one screw sense largely predominant in a single macro-
molecule, the intramolecular equilibration must be hindered by building very
rigid chains. In the limiting case the chains will form rods having helical structure
with either left- or right-handed helicity. Even if hindering of equilibration can be
considered as a kinetic effect, it cannot be excluded that thermodynamic contri-
butions are involved, particularly when rigidity is due to bulk side chains and
conformational reversals have a very high internal energy [5,9]. In other words,
bulky side chains in a vinyl type structure, for instance, can favor the formation of
longer helical chain sections, as the lower entropy is balanced by the gain in
internal energy due to minimization of the number of conformational reversals.
Indeed these last have, in the case of macromolecules with bulky and branched
side chains, larger internal energy per structural unit than the same unit in the
helical conformation [10]. Which mechanism is actually operating cannot be
established from primary structure as a general rule, an increase in temperature in
both cases favoring the equilibration of the two screw senses within each
macromolecular chain.
Chiroptical properties (molar rotatory power [ $ ] and molar ellipticity [0])
result from a weighted average of the contributions from different conformers, as
shown in the following equations:
where N1 indicates the molar fraction and [O] 1 (or [G]1) indicates the molar
rotatory power (or molar ellipticity) of the i-th conformer. In macromolecules the
molar entities refer to one residue; thus the chiroptical properties are independent
of molecular weight, at least when this is very high.
It has been demonstrated that in isotactic polymers of optically active a-olefins
the molar optical rotation per monomeric residue can be interpreted in terms of
the prevalence of few conformations with very high optical rotation of the same
sign, corresponding to those allowed to the structural unit inserted in an one
screw sense helix [11].
Moreover, in coisotactic copolymers of optically active a-olefins with viny-
laromatic monomers, it was shown that the aromatic groups in the side chains
give rise to dichroic bands in the spectral region of the n->n* electronic
transitions. In several cases exciton splitting was also observed, correspon-
ding to the strong allowed n-m* electronic transition [12]. This circular-
dichroism (CD) couplet was confirmed to be connected to the dipole-dipole
electronic interaction of transition moments of aromatic moieties disposed
in a mutual chiral geometry with a predominant handedness, such as that of
a one screw sense helix [13,14]. This clear demonstration that the extrinsic
CD bands of side chains are related to main chain conformation indicates
their usefulness as 'conformational probes'. A typical case comprises poly-
peptides with aromatic side chains masking the peptide absorption bands
[15].
14.1.2 OBJECTIVE
dark takes place so slowly that it cannot be observed under normal experimental
conditions. The photochromic cycles are completely reversible and can be
repeated at will, without any apparent fatigue.
As a consequence of the different electronic situations, the two isomers have
markedly different absorption, and the photo-isomerization is accompanied by
strong variations in the spectra (Figure 14.2). In particular, the trans-to-cis
isomerization is revealed by a strong decrease of the intense band at « 350 nm
associated with a n-n* transition and a contemporaneous increase of the band at
450 nm associated with the n-n* transition of the azo-chromophore.
Spiro Spiro
Spiro group
opposite to that usually observed in most common organic solvents. Thus, HFP
solutions kept in the dark at room temperature show a yellow-orange color
which is completely bleached upon exposure to visible light and is reversibly
restored in the dark.
NMR data confirm that the photochromism in HFP involves the well-known
interconversion between the colorless closed spiro structure / and the colored
ring-opened merocyanine structure II (Figure 14.7). Accordingly, in the 13C
NMR spectra of the colorless solution the resonances of the geminal methyl
groups appear as two separate peakes, 27.0 and 21.0 ppm, as a consequence of the
presence of the chiral spiro carbon atom. In the colored solution, by contrast, the
two methyl group resonances merge to a single signal at 28.7 ppm, analogously to
that observed for the proton resonances. The spectra of the colored species kept
in the dark do not show nuclear resonances associated with the spiro form,
indicating that in HFP the spiropyran ;=± merocyanine equilibrium is fully shifted
to the right.
The very polar solvent HFP is probably responsible for the reverse photo-
chromism by stabilizing the charged merocyanine species II more than the apolar
spiropyran species I. A protonated open structure III might also be formed
between the zwitterionic species II and HFP, with the solvent functioning as an
acid, as will be described in the following section.
The dark-adapted sample shows a spectrum which displays two absorption
maxima, at 500 and 370 nm, of about the same intensity (Figure 14.8). Irradiation
with visible light (500-550 nm) or exposure to sunlight for a few seconds
completely dispels the absorption in the visible region and gives rise to the
spectrum of the colorless spiro form, characterized by absorption maxima at 355
and 272 nm. In the dark, the original spectrum is progressively restored.
In the colorless indolinospiropyran species, the two halves of the molecule
are topologically independent, so the absorption spectrum consists mainly of
A
light
dark
Figure 14.8 Variation of the absorption spectra as a function of irradiation and dark-
adaptation time for poly(L-glutamic acid) bearing 85mol% spiropyran units in HFP
(c = 5.01 x 10"2 g/1; / = 1 cm); 1, dark-adapted solution; 2, irradiated solution
dark
Figure 14.9 Reverse photochromic reactions of spiropyran salts (see Fig. 14.7)
light
dark
merocyanine form , %
Figure 14.13 PoIy(GIu) bearing 85 mol% spiropyran units. a-Helix relative variation as
a function of spiropyran/merocyanine isomeric composition of the side chains, in pure
HFP ( ) and HFP/MeOH/TFA = 90/10/5 x 10 " 2 ( ). The a-helix variation in
% was estimated as {[@]V[©]°} x 100, where [0]° and [ 0 ] ' are the ellipticity values
measured at 222 nm at the beginning and at the time t during decay, at 250C
Exposure to light and the consequent photoconversion of the side chains to the
apolar spiro form make the macromolecules adopt the a-helix conformation.
In order to investigate the dependence of the secondary structure on the
isomeric composition of the photochromic side chains, the rate of the helix-to-
coil conversion and the rate of appearance of absorbance at the longer
wavelength in the dark were measured simultaneously. The helix content was
then plotted as a function of the photochromic units present in the merocyanine
form (Figure 14.13). In pure H F P (Figure 14.13, dotted line), the helical structure
starts to break up rapidly as soon as the merocyanine species begin to be formed,
and the helix -* coil conformational change takes place almost entirely following
conversion of % 30% of spiropyran to merocyanine groups. A rather different
behavior is observed in HFP/MeOH/TFA (Figure 14.13, full line): the helix
content decreases slowly with increasing merocyanine percentage, but the helical
structure does not collapse until « 50% of the spiro groups are isomerized to the
merocyanine form.
The different dependence of the helix structure on the percentage of photo-
chromic groups present in the merocyanine form is a confirmation that denatura-
tion of the macromolecules in the dark occurs through different mechanisms in
non-acidic and acidic media. In the former case denaturation should be caused by
stacking and aggregation between zwitterionic merocyanine species II. In the
latter case, denaturation should be caused by repulsive forces among the cationic
side chains III. In both cases, exposure to light removes the electrostatic
interactions between side chains, allowing the formation by the polypeptide
chains.
Also poly(Lys)-containing spirobenzopyran side chains, as well as low molecu-
lar weight model compounds, exhibit intense 'negative' photochromism in HFP
[25]. In the dark the solutions are orange, with two absorption maxima at
«470nm (£mol = 31700) and 370 nm (emol = 32 000). Exposure to sunlight is
accompanied by prompt bleaching, with a shift of the absorption maxima to
353 nm (emol = 11200) and 270-272 nm (emol = 16 200). The original spectrum is
reversibly restored when the illumination is stopped. Decay in the dark at 25 0 C
follows first order kinetics for the model compounds, with a rate constant of
5.7 x 10" 3 min" 1 and a half-life of «122min. For the polymer, the kinetics
deviate slightly from monoexponential and biexponential decay; the time necess-
ary to restore half of the original absorbance is « 80 min.
The analogy of these reversible processes with those observed in spiropyran-
modified poly(Glu) suggests the occurrence of similar photochromic reactions.
Accordingly, HFP stabilizes the colored ionic merocyanine structure, while
irradiation gives the colorless spiro structure.
In pure HFP, the CD spectra are consistent with those of random coil
polypeptide chains, and the photoisomerization reaction does not affect the
polymer conformation at all. Addition of triethylamine to the HFP solution
induces the coil-•helix transition, but the amount of base necessary to induce
the transition is different for the dark-adapted sample (15% v/v) than for
the irradiated one (30% v/v). Thus, at any composition in the range 3-15%
v/v of NEt 3 , exposure to sunlight produces reversible variations of the helix
content. Combination of the effects due to the photochromic behavior with
appropriate amounts of NEt 3 allows modulation of the extent of the photo-
response.
It appears that in pure HFP the conformation for poly(Lys)-containing
spiropyran is determined by the unmodified Lys side chains protonated by the
acid solvent; as a consequence, the polypeptide assumes a coil conformation
which is not affected by the isomerization of the photochromic groups. Addition
of a moderate amount (3-15%) OfNEt3 removes protons from Lys side chains,
whose basicity depends on isomeric composition of the photochromic moieties.
In the range between the transition curves of the dark-adapted and the irradiated
sample, the chain folding ;=± unfolding is then controlled by the isomerization of
the photochromic side chains: when these are in the charged merocyanine form,
the polypeptide chains are in the random coil arrangement, but photoconversion
to the apolar spiropyran form causes the macromolecules to assume a helical
conformation. At NEt 3 contents above 15%, the high concentration of
a NEt 3 • HFP saline complex can probably exert a shielding effect on the charged
side chains, allowing the polypeptide to stay in the helical conformation at any
photoisomeric composition.
The system described provides a well defined example of the combined action
of light and environment on the secondary structure of polypeptides. It can thus
be considered as a macromolecular model resembling the behavior of naturally
occurring photoreceptors [32].
t i m e , mi n
Figure 14.14 PoIy(GIu) bearing 85mol% spiropyran units. a-Helix content ( ) and
viscosity ( ) variation during decay in the dark at 25 0C. HFP solutions were irradiated,
then dark adapted and monitored over time. The percentage of a-helix variation is
estimated as indicated in Figure 14.13
a-helix variation,%
t i m e , min
Figure 14.15 Helix content ( ) and viscosity ( ) variation during decay in the dark
for poly(Lys) bearing 46 mol% spiropyran units, in HFP/NEt3 = 94/6
14.3 REFERENCES
[1] (a) M. Farina, Chim. Ind. (Milan), 1986, 68, 62; (b) M. Farina, Top. Stereochem.,
1987,17,1.
[2] P. Pino, Adv. Polym. ScL, 1965,4, 393.
[3] F. Ciardelli, M. Aglietto and G. Ruggeri, in M. Fontanille and A. Guyot (Eds.),
Recent Advances in Mechanistic and Synthetic Aspects of Polymerization, Reidel,
Dordrecht, 1987, p. 409.
[4] G. Natta, Makromol. Chem., 1960,35,94.
[5] P. Pino, F. Ciardelli and G.P. Lorenzi, J. Polym. ScI, Part C, 1963, 4,21.
[6] P. Pino, F. Ciardelli and M. Zandomeneghi, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1970, 21,
561.
[7] F. Ciardelli and P. Salvadori, Pure Appl. Chem., 1985,57,931.
[8] E.R. Blout, in F. Ciardelli and P. Salvadori (Eds.), Fundamental Aspects and Recent
Developments in ORD and CD, Heyden, London, 1973, Chs. 4 and 5.
[9] P.L. Luisi and F. Ciardelli, in A.D. Jenkins and A. Ledwith (Eds.), Reactivity,
Mechanism and Structure in Polymer Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1974, p. 471.
[10] P.L. Luisi and P. Pino, J. Phys. Chem., 1968,72,2400.
[11] P. Pino, F. Ciardelli, G.P. Lorenzi and G. Montagnoli, Makromol. Chem., 1963,61,
207.
[12] F. Ciardelli, P. Salvadori, C. Carlini and E. Chiellini, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1972, 94,
6536.
[13] W. Hug, F. Ciardelli and I. Tinoco, Jr, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1974,96, 3407.
[14] F. Ciardelli, C. Righini, M. Zandomeneghi and W. Hug, J. Phys. Chem., 1977, 81,
1948.
[15] F. Ciardelli and O. Pieroni, Chimia, 1980, 34, 301.
[16] F. Ciardelli, O. Pieroni, A. Fissi and J.L. Houben, Biopolymers, 1984,23, 1423.
[17] A. Fissi, O. Pieroni and F. Ciardelli, Biopolymers, 1987, 26,1993.
[18] O. Pieroni, D. Fabbri, A. Fissi and F. Ciardelli, Makromol. Chem., Rapid. Commun.,
1988,9,637.
[19] B.R. Malcolm and O. Pieroni, Biopolymers, 1990, 29,1121.
[20] O. Pieroni, A. Fissi, J.L. Houben and F. Ciardelli, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1985,107,2990.
[21] M.M. Long and D.W. Ury, in E. Grell (Ed.), Membrane Spectroscopy, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 1981, pp. 143-171.
[22] P. Bayley, in S.B. Brown (Ed.), An Introduction to Spectroscopy for Biochemists,
Academic Press, London, 1980, pp. 148-234.
[23] A. Fissi and O. Pieroni, Macromolecules, 1989,22,1115.
[24] F. Ciardelli, D. Fabbri, O. Pieroni and A. Fissi, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1989, 111, 3470.
[25] O. Pieroni, A. Fissi, A. Viegi, D. Fabbri and F. Ciardelli, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1992,114,
2734.
[26] N.W. Tyer, Jr, and R.S. Becker, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1970,92,1289.
[27] T.M. Cooper, K.A. Obermeyer, L.V. Natarajan and R.L. Crane, Photochem. Photo-
biol., 1992,55,1.
[28] A.S. Kholmanskii and K.M. Dyumaev, Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. TransL), 1987, 56,
136.
[29] WJ. Middleton and R.V. Lindsey, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 1964,86,4948.
[30] (a) J.R. Parrish, Jr., and E.R. Blout, Biopolymers, 1971,10,1491; (b) R.W. Woody, J.
Polym. ScL, Macromol. Rev., 1977,12,181.
[31] (a) M. Satoh, Y. Fujii, F. Kato and J. Komiyama, Biopolymers, 1991,31, l;(b) R.F.
Epand and H. Scheraga, Biopolymers, 1968, 6,1383.
[32] B.F. Erlanger, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1976,45,267.