The document is a final assessment form from an industry mentor evaluating a student's performance in their internship. It assesses the student on their final process/equipment design, application of engineering principles, leadership abilities, and professional discipline. The student is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being "excellent" and 1 being "poor". The mentor provides brief descriptions of what constitutes each rating level in each category. They then sign and date the form, and include their name, designation, and the industry/organization name and seal.
The document is a final assessment form from an industry mentor evaluating a student's performance in their internship. It assesses the student on their final process/equipment design, application of engineering principles, leadership abilities, and professional discipline. The student is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being "excellent" and 1 being "poor". The mentor provides brief descriptions of what constitutes each rating level in each category. They then sign and date the form, and include their name, designation, and the industry/organization name and seal.
The document is a final assessment form from an industry mentor evaluating a student's performance in their internship. It assesses the student on their final process/equipment design, application of engineering principles, leadership abilities, and professional discipline. The student is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being "excellent" and 1 being "poor". The mentor provides brief descriptions of what constitutes each rating level in each category. They then sign and date the form, and include their name, designation, and the industry/organization name and seal.
The document is a final assessment form from an industry mentor evaluating a student's performance in their internship. It assesses the student on their final process/equipment design, application of engineering principles, leadership abilities, and professional discipline. The student is rated on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category, with 5 being "excellent" and 1 being "poor". The mentor provides brief descriptions of what constitutes each rating level in each category. They then sign and date the form, and include their name, designation, and the industry/organization name and seal.
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, Punjab -147004, INDIA
Department of Chemical Engineering
Final Assessment (20 marks) – To be filled by industry mentor
Roll No.: .............................................. Student name: ........................................................................
Excellent Good Average Poor Marks achieved 5 3-4 2 1 X Final design of Design meets or Design meets desired Barely capable of Not capable of process/equipment/ exceeds desired objectives. achieving desired achieving desired system: arrived and objectives with specific Moderately effective objectives. Minimal objectives. No or trivial optimized through timeframe. Effective utilization of resource. utilization of resource. utilization of resource. engineering, social, implementation of environmental, ethical, resource. economic, financial, institutional and commercial considerations Application of Engineering Critical selection and Effective application of Serious deficiencies in No or erroneous Principles and software/ application of engineering principles proper selection and application of mathematical tools: using engineering principles resulting in reasonable use of engineering engineering principles engineering knowledge and ensuring reasonable solution with moderate principles with low yielding unreasonable concepts/codes/standards/ results and adequate application of level of application of solution and trivial or design manuals/literature application of design software/mathematical software/mathematical no application of and software/mathematical tools. tools. tools. software/mathematical tools. tools. Leadership: able to work in Taken initiative to Taken moderate Occasionally taken Never or rarely took group(s) and to take meet project initiative to meet initiative to meet initiative to meet initiative requirements and/or project requirements project requirements project requirements able to consult and and/or moderate and/or non-adequate and/or limited ability work with peers in ability to consult and ability to consult and to consult and work various fields in the work with peers in work with peers in with peers in various realisation of project. various fields in the various fields in the fields in the realisation realisation of project. realisation of project. of project. Page 1 of 2 Excellent Good Average Poor Marks achieved 5 3-4 2 1 X Professional discipline: Maintained high Maintained moderate Moderate to low Poor overall maintained overall degree of professional to high degree of degree of professional professional discipline. discipline of the discipline in all professional disciplines disciplines in all or organization categories. in all or most most categories. (attendance/regularity, categories. meetings with the industry mentors, attentive to the professional/environmental / health and safety protocols of organisation) Total marks achieved ΣX
Signature with date:
Evaluated by (name): Designation: Industry/organization name & seal: