Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study of The Umbilical Cord Length and Foetal Outcome .
A Study of The Umbilical Cord Length and Foetal Outcome .
A Study of The Umbilical Cord Length and Foetal Outcome .
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY
A study of the umbilical cord length and foetal outcome at Kanyama First
Level Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
V3. 09/10/2020.(KM)
Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
The Umbilical cord is a structure that attaches to the navel before birth and connects the foetus to
the placenta; contains the umbilical arteries and vein (Marieb et al)
It is the essential life-sustaining connection of the developing baby and many scholars refer to it
as “baby’s life-line” as (Donald, 1994) put it, “the baby’s life hangs by a cord.”
The umbilical cord is the most important part of the foetoplacental unit. Studies have shown that
complete obstruction of the cord leads to foetal demise and partial obstruction has been
associated with brain damage while foetal distress in utero has been found to occur due to
umbilical cord abnormalities. (Balkawade et al, 2012)
Different authors associate umbilical cord length with foetal activity and movement even though
it is not completely understood what controls cord length, Nevertheless, it is believed that
sufficient space in the amniotic cavity for movement and the tensile force applied to the
umbilical cord during foetal movements are two main factors that determine cord length
(Benirschke. 2004)
There is wide variation in the length of the umbilical cord with extremes varying from no cord
(achordia) to 300 cm, with diameters up to 3 cm (Berg and Rayburn, 1995). About 5% of cords
are shorter than 35 cm, and another 5% are longer than 80 cm (Berg and Rayburn, 1995).
The fully developed umbilical cord is on average some 50 – 60 cm long. The vessels of the
umbilical cord are rarely straight, and are usually twisted into either a right – or left – handed
cylindrical helix. The number of turns involved ranges a few to over 300. (Grays 40th edition).
And a study done in the United States of America showed that up to 10 % of all stillbirths are
due to umbilical cord abnormalities (Collins et al, 2012).
A study done by Balkawade et al, found cases of short-cord group had maximum cases of
caesarean section (40.7 %), than cases with long (24.5 %) or normal (23.6 %) cord length.
Normal-cord group cases had maximum number of vaginal delivery cases (76.4 %) more than
75.5 % for long-cord group and 59.3 % for short-cord group. Short-cord group was associated
with significantly higher (p < 0.05) incidence of caesarean section cases (Balkawade, 2012).
1.3. Rationale
The umbilical cord length has very important clinical correlates especially as it concerns the
growth, wellbeing and the survival of the new-born (Ogunlaja et al, 2015)
In his book, (Collins, 2014) said that it has been estimated that 30% of births have some type of
umbilical cord anomaly. This statistic implies a potential for foetal harm that may not be
appreciated by scientific and public health authorities. Not knowing how many foetuses are
harmed by their umbilical cords prevents research into the issue. If neurological harm can occur
as the result of umbilical cord problems, then mechanism of harm to the foetus needs to be
investigated. (Collins, 2014)
1.2. Objectives
A study was conducted by (Balkawade, 2012) on 1000 deliveries. The mean length of the cord was
found to be 63.86+/-15.69 cm ranging from 24cm to 124cm. Short cords were associated with
increased rates of LSCS whereas variability in foetal heart rate and birth asphyxia were associated
with long cords.
Suzuki et al studied the perinatal outcome of 11, 029 singleton women in association to length of the
umbilical cord. In his study, the mean length of the cord was 56.2+/-11.7cm. Author of this study
considered the length less than 38cm (-1.5SD below the mean) as Short cord and the length greater
than 74cm (+1.5SD above the mean) as a Long cord, which occurred in 0.9% and 5% respectively.
In this study both long and short cords were not associated with any maternal and foetal impairment.
According to (Georgiadis et al), many complications of pregnancy and delivery are associated with
umbilical cord length. And in this study, significantly shorter cords where found in women with
placental abruption. (Suzuki ,2012)
Another study conducted in Norway a population-based register study of all singleton births during
the period of 1999 – 2013 found that short cords were associated with a 50% increased risk of
abruption in the total population of 856 300 and a double risk of abruption at term. (Linde et al,
2018)
Chapter 4 : METHODOLOGY
Dependent variables
1. APGAR score
2. Foetal weight
3. Mode of delivery
1. Singleton deliveries
2. Healthy women with gestational age 37 – 42 weeks
3. Delivery via vaginal or caesarean section
Exclusion criteria
1. Preterm deliveries (i.e. <37 weeks) or postdates (i.e. >42 weeks)
2. Previously diagnosed intrauterine foetal death
3. Multiple pregnancies
4. All patients with a manually removed placenta
Careful examination of the umbilical cord and measuring its length will be done and while
measuring the stump on the baby, sterile surgical gloves, caps, face masks and protective
gowns will be worn by the principle investigator to prevent infection of the new-born.
The data collecting tool will also capture the foetal parameters such as gender, birth weight,
Apgar score and mode of delivery
1. Algreisi, Fahad & Brown, Richard & Shrim, Alon & Albasri, Samera & Shamarani,
Hanan & AlZoubiadi, Aisha. 2016, Effect of long and short umbilical cord on perinatal
outcome. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
5. 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20164042.
2. Balkawade, Nilesh & Shinde, Mangala. 2012, Study of Length of Umbilical Cord and Fetal
Outcome: A Study of 1,000 Deliveries. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India. 62.
520-525. 10.1007/s13224-012-0194-0.
12. Ogunlaja, Olumuyiwa & Ogunlaja, I.P. 2015, Correlation between umbilical cord length,
birth weight and length of singleton deliveries at term in a Nigerian population. Sudan
Journal of Medical Sciences. published 2016. Accessed 09/10/202
13. Ryo, Eiji & Kamata, Hideo & Seto, Michiharu & Morita, Masayoshi & Yatsuki, Keita.
2019, Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a
fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder. European Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X. 1. 100003. 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100003.
14. Suzuki S, Yukiko F, 2012, Length of the Umbilical Cord and Perinatal Outcomes in
Japanese Singleton Pregnancies Delivered at Greater Than or Equal to 34 Weeks’ Gestation.
J Clin Gynecol Obstet. Elmer Press. 2012;1(4-5):57-62, (accessed 02/072020)
15. Yamamoto, Yuriko & Aoki, Shigeru & Oba, Mari & Seki, Kazuo & Hirahara, Fumiki.
2016, Relationship Between Short Umbilical Cord Length and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.
Fetal and pediatric pathology. 35. 1-7. 10.3109/15513815.2015.1122126. (accessed
17/06/2020)