1

Networking Fundamentals

Student’s Name

Institution Affiliation

Course Title

Professor’s Name

Date
 2

Networking Fundamentals

Routing protocols are pivotal in determining how data packets traverse through networks,

ensuring efficient communication between devices. These protocols are essential to manage the

complex task of directing data across various interconnected nodes. Several aspects come into

play when considering the factors that can prompt the replacement of a routing protocol.

Technological advancements and evolving network requirements are prime drivers. For instance,

a protocol might be replaced if it becomes outdated and cannot accommodate increased network

traffic or new security challenges.

Additionally, the scalability and adaptability of a routing protocol are crucial. If a

network experiences rapid growth, the existing protocol might be swapped for one that better

handles the increased load. Moreover, security vulnerabilities in the current protocol can trigger a

replacement in favor of a more secure alternative.

An illustrative example of a routing protocol replacement is the transition from RIP

(Routing et al.) to OSPF (Open et al.). RIP, a distance-vector protocol, had limitations in

handling large networks due to its slow convergence and limited hop count (Roy & Deb, 2018).

As networks grew more intricate, OSPF, a link-state protocol, emerged as a replacement due to

its faster convergence, scalability, and support for hierarchical network design. The need for

improved performance and adaptability to modern network demands drove the replacement.

Network categories must be distinguished to understand their functions. P2P networks

allow devices to interact directly without a server (Cao et al., 2020). File sharing and

collaboration leverage P2P networks for resource sharing and fault tolerance. In contrast, client-

server networks operate with a centralized server that handles resource management and

communication. Clients request services or resources from the server and respond accordingly
 3

(Musa et al., 2019). This architecture offers centralized control, efficient resource utilization, and

easier maintenance.

In summary, the world of routing protocols and network classifications is ever-evolving.

The need for protocol replacements can arise from technological advancements, scalability

concerns, and security vulnerabilities. Transitioning from one protocol to another often stems

from the pursuit of enhanced performance and adaptability. Meanwhile, understanding the

distinctions between network categories like peer-to-peer and client-server is essential for

designing efficient communication infrastructures tailored to specific requirements.

 4

References

Cao, T., Yu, J., Jérémie Decouchant, Luo, X., & Paulo Veríssimo. (2020). Exploring the Monero

Peer-to-Peer Network. 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_31

Musa, A., Abubakar, A., Gimba, U. A., & Rasheed, R. A. (2019). An Investigation into Peer-to-

Peer Network Security Using Wireshark. 2019 15th International Conference on

Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO).

https://doi.org/10.1109/icecco48375.2019.9043236

Roy, A., & Deb, T. (2018). Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc

Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, pp. 33–48.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6890-4_4