Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Alaina Gates
Mrs. Gustafson
English 3H
2 November 2022
Generations Later
Unplanned teenage pregnancy does not just affect one person. It is not just the
mother-to-be, nor is it just the product of the pregnancy that is affected. Most people do not think
about the long-term effects, and how the event of an unplanned teenage pregnancy snowballs
itself into bigger problems generation after generation. The children and grandchildren are
forever affected by the lack of a proper parent-child relationship, and many fall into that same
trap of early parenthood. Teenage pregnancy is luckily preventable. The improvement of sex
education and the teaching of safe contraceptive options in school at a younger age helps to
lower the rates of pregnancy in teens, educates about the prevention of sexually transmitted
diseases, and in turn, helps to lower the rates of abortion. The current sex education that is being
offered in the curriculum is not properly regulated, the current most common teachings are
harmful to the safety and health of our youth. There are better ways to teach children about
themselves and their health in a safe environment, rather than leaving it solely up to their parents.
In Illinois, the curriculum is laid out very clearly. According to the Illinois State Board of
Education, the standard for sex education in Illinois is to teach seven key topics: Consent and
Healthy Relationships, Anatomy and Physiology, Puberty and Adolescent Sexual Development,
Gender Identity and expression, Sexual Orientation and Identity, Sexual Health, and
Interpersonal Violence (ISBE). These seven key topics laid out in the Illinois curriculum are the
same as the National standards but are only partially regulated. Even though these are the
Gates 2
standards for Illinois sex education, these are not the requirements. As stated on the Illinois State
Board of Education’s website, “Sex education in Illinois is optional for districts to provide”
(ISBE). It is also stated that parents are able to opt-out of the sex education that is provided at
schools. The option for parents to opt-out works well to regulate the information that individuals
get, a choice made for these children by people they know. The problem lies in the fact that
entire school districts are able to decide if they are going to teach sex education. This leaves
plenty of room for children to fall through the cracks and not get the education they actually
need. These standards have already sparked some arguments about what should be taught.
representing District 77 near Chicago, speaks of many of the school districts in her area adopting
the new curriculum. This directly clashes with the words of Republican Illinois State
Representative Adam Niemerg, who claims that most of the schools in his area are opting out of
the program (Gersh). These opposing views need to come to a consensus on what should be
implemented in schools, so as to not let any children be left behind without the education they
need or deserve. These children that end up not getting the education they need are more
Currently, those who are most affected by teenage pregnancy are minorities. According to
data collected by the CDC, “In 2019, the birth rates for Hispanic teens (25.3) and non-Hispanic
Black teens (25.8) were more than two times higher than the rate for non-Hispanic White teens
(11.4).” (CDC). These statistics are getting better and better each year, with more and more
decline in numbers, but those who are minorities are experiencing less progress in lowering rates
of pregnancy. This, of course, begs the question of why. When looking deeper into the
breakdown of sex education in America, the answer is clear. According to CNN’s ethnicity
Gates 3
breakdown of the United States, many of the states that are illustrated stress abstinence only.
CNN’s ethnicity breakdown helps show where many of these minorities are located, and when
compared to SIECUS' Sex Ed State Law & Policy Chart, which illustrates which states stress
abstinence only, they correspond (CNN & SIECUS). What this all means, is the same areas
where sex education is failing to be taught, are the same areas that are most commonly
experiencing teenage pregnancies. Meaning these pregnancies are most likely a product of this
lack of education. The effects of teaching absence only reach further than teenage pregnancies.
Not only does sex education help teach about reproduction, but it also teaches about healthy
relationships and sexually transmitted diseases. According to the National Library of Medicine,
distorting data on topics such as condom efficacy, and promoting gender stereotypes” (NIH). The
data from these recent findings from this depicts the severity of teaching an inaccurate subject.
One thing that was mentioned in the National Library of medicine’s study was the effects that
abstinence-only teaching has on the data relating to condom efficiency. This brings up the topic
of contraceptives.
Sex education does more than teach the basics of the “birds and bees.” Sex education
teaches children from a young age to build healthy relationships, the upkeep of sexual health,
and use contraceptives. Sex education gradually introduces the basics of consent and bodily
autonomy from a young age. These things are important to teach at a young age to help protect
children from sexual violence, and to keep them aware of their relationships with others. The
things that children would learn in their sex education class are important things for kids to know
to help prevent sexual assault. As stated by an article written by Megan Osbren, the teachings of
consent, autonomy, boundaries, and trusting yourself to young children helps to prevent sexual
Gates 4
assault in future generations (HCWC). Teaching sex education is extremely important in the
protection of children in general, but it also helps the protection of these kids as they grow up.
Removing any sort of stigma surrounding this kind of education at a young age is critical to
The teaching of contraceptives directly correlates with the decline in teenage pregnancy.
According to data collected by Guttmacher Institution and their director of public policy, Heather
protecting themselves from risk," (Boonstra). Not only is the use of contraceptives helping lower
rates of teen pregnancies, but is also teaching about protection from other things such as sexually
transmitted diseases. Teenagers knowing about the risks helps them to make more educated
decisions and to be careful with what they do. These things that would be taught in sex education
would not normally be brought up in everyday life for most people. This means that the only
place some kids learn these things is in school. This is another important reason why there needs
to be a better standard for sex education in America. A study done by the National; Library of
Medicine states that “The CHOICE Project also found that when cost is removed, the majority
study helps to further the point that contraceptive use on the part of teenagers is extremely
beneficial. This promoted use of contraceptives is a healthy habit for teenagers. The more that
these topics that are deemed “taboo” are talked about, the more normalized these topics become.
The stigma surrounding any talk about sex and sexual health needs to be stopped in order to
ensure the safety and health of generations yet to come. This desensitization to perfectly normal
and natural behavior helps create a better environment for generations to come and helps protect
On the other side of things, there is a cause for concern. Some parents want to be
involved in informing their children of such a universal experience. Everyone needs to know
certain things about themselves, and some parents want to be the ones to teach their own
children. Whether this is for cultural or religious reasons or even just the want to monitor what is
being taught, parents are concerned about the information that their children consume. Whether
this is through the elusive “talk” that many kids have to sit through or just the need to control,
some parents want to be the ones to teach their children. The biggest reason for complaints about
sex education coming from school is the religious side of it. Teaching anything but
abstinence-only could be against the wishes of some parents. According to an article written by
an organization called Catholic Parents Online, “The primary teachers of children are their
parents. It is their right and responsibility to teach sexual morality to their children.” (CPO). This
same article goes on to talk about the ways that these children could be taught this subject.
Parents never truly know exactly what is being taught to their children, and in such a
touchy topic, it is difficult to let children learn through someone else, all while not knowing
exactly what is being taught. The article mentions not knowing what goes on behind “closed
doors,” hinting at the fact that this curriculum is extensive, and some things that you want to
keep your child from you are not able to do if you let them through the school offered programs
(CPO). This also raises the concern about not knowing exactly what is being taught to your child
since you are not there in the classroom to monitor it, and the child will not accurately relay the
information, so there is no way for certain to know just the education that your child is getting.
The main concern with parents teaching their children is not every parent thinks to teach their
child all the lessons they get in sex education classes. The main cause for concern is the teaching
of consent and health relationships. Many people, even adults, are not aware of their situations if
Gates 6
they were raised a certain way. Some people may not realize all the way into adulthood that they
do not have healthy relationships, and teaching this to their children furthers the problem
Keeping everything in mind, there is more good than bad caused by introducing sex
education to children in schools. Taking religious reasons into account, there is still much to gain
for a child receiving proper sex education. Learning more than just abstinence as a form of birth
control helps keep adolescents safe and protected from any risks and teaches them about
self-awareness. This education also protects the younger children from harmful situations or
relationships they otherwise wouldn’t understand. The benefits of sex education far outweigh the
downsides in the sense that children are better able to protect themselves from a multitude of
things and ensure a healthy lifestyle for themselves and for the generations that come after them.
The implementation of proper sex education in schools will overall better the quality of
education for children. Not only does sex education teach about self-awareness, autonomy, and
sexual health, but the betterment of sex education helps to reduce the stigma surrounding sex in
general, creating a healthier environment for everyone. Making the change to better sex
education now helps to better the lives of generations to come, instead of harming them with
Works Cited
“About Teen Pregnancy.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease
“Declines in Teen Pregnancy Risk Entirely Driven by Improved Contraceptive Use.” Guttmacher
www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2016/declines-teen-pregnancy-risk-entirely-driven-impr
oved-contraceptive-use.
Gersh, AJ. “Many Illinois Schools Opting out of National Sex Education Standards.” WICS,
newschannel20.com/news/local/isbe-adopts-national-sex-education-standards-many-illinoi
health.
“Map: Race and Ethnicity across the US.” CNN, Cable News Network,
www.cnn.com/interactive/2021/us/census-race-ethnicity-map/.
Osborne, Megan. “7 Things We Can Teach Children to Prevent Sexual Assault in Future
Ott, Mary A, and John S Santelli. “Abstinence and Abstinence-Only Education.” Current
Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Oct. 2007,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913747/.
catholicparents.org/ten-good-reasons-oppose-public-school-sex-education/.
Todd, Nicole, and Amanda Black. “Contraception for Adolescents.” Journal of Clinical
Gates 8
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7053440/.