Đề 1: Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their

free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual
teenager and society as a whole.
Do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that adolescents must participate in volunteer work in their spare time
because of the advantages for themselves as well as for the community. From my point of view,
uncharged jobs bring a variety of benefits, nonetheless, I just partly agree with the notion to force
all students to do this kind of work.
On the one hand, I will not contradict the point that school should encourage their students to
join volunteer work. In terms of individuals, such activities help youngsters create a sense of
responsibility because after the campaigns people could understand that implication of work is
more important than the money they might receive. With respect to society, this work could
connect people together, in addition to raising their awareness about sympathy. For instance, last
year I took part in an unpaid teaching event in a remote area and during that time I learned many
things about local culture along with building up new relationships.
On the other hand, I must take issue with the view that all teenagers should be required to do
unpaid things. Firstly, more often than not, adolescents are under great pressure of studying as
well as testing, therefore they ought to spend their spare time relaxing or hanging out with their
friends. People have approximately 15 years at school, while the rest is at the offices,
accordingly, they need not dedicate themselves too early. Besides, because there are many
families running into financial troubles, their children could get a part-time job to mitigate the
problem for their parents rather than doing unpaid work.
In conclusion, I think that people should participate in voluntary work if possible, however, it
will not be plausible for schools to include such activities as a mandatory part.
Đề 2: Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their
teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of
children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not schoolchildren should be given homework. While
there are some strong arguments against the setting of homework, I still believe that it is a
necessary aspect of education.
There are several reasons why people might argue that homework is an unnecessary burden on
children. Firstly, there is evidence to support the idea that homework does nothing to improve
educational outcomes. Countries such as Finland, where school children are not given
homework, regularly top international educational league tables and outperform nations where
setting homework is the norm. Secondly, many parents would agree that the school day is
already long enough, and leaves their children too tired to do further study when they return
home. Finally, it is recognized that playtime is just as beneficial as study time from the
perspective of brain development.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that homework has an important role to play
in the schooling of children. The main benefit of homework is that it encourages independent
learning and problem solving, as children are challenged to work through tasks alone and at their
own pace. In doing so, students must apply the knowledge that they have learnt in the classroom.
For example, by doing mathematics exercises at home, students consolidate their understanding
of the concepts taught by their teacher at school. In my view, it is important for children to
develop an independent study habit because this prepares them to work alone as adults.
In conclusion, homework certainly has its drawbacks, but I believe that the benefits outweigh
them in the long term.