Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cre Lab Ubaid
Cre Lab Ubaid
Engineering university of
Engineering and Technology
Peshawar.
Lab
Report
Chemical
Reaction
Engineering
1
Experiment No 01:
Demonstration of Chemical Reactor Service Unit
This unit is designed by internationally modified UK Company, ARMFIELD. Its basic material
of construction is ABS (Acronytrile-Butadiene-Styrene).
SPECIFICATIONS
It is basically a self contained bench top service unit designed in such a manner that three
types of reactors can be mounted on it:
Batch reactor
Tubular reactor
Stirred tank reactor
REAGENT TANK
There are two reagent tanks on the unit having a capacity of 5 liters each. They are used to
store the reactants. There are rigid pipes inside the tanks that are used to suck the reactants
from the tanks.
PUMPS
There are two peristaltic pumps, one for each reagent tank. They work as feed pumps for the
reactor and transfer reactants from the tank to reactor. The speed of these pumps can be
changed using controllers beside them. The flow rate from the pump ranges from 0-95 ml/min.
Agitator is driven by electric motor and is used for homogenization of heat in the reactor. The
speed of agittor can be controlled using control system, at the right side of the pumps.
It usually provides hot or cold water for the reactor. Water is heated in the circulator by electrical
heating.
CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT
There is a conductivity probe which can be used with any of the reactors. During the chemical
reaction, it senses the conductivity of the solution and conductivity values are displayed on the
screen.a
2
EXPERIMENT # 2
CALIBRATION OF FEED PUMPS, TEMPERATURE AND CONDUCTIVITY SENSORS
PROVIDED WITH CHEMICAL REACTOR SERVICE UNIT AND TO FIND OUT FLOW RATE
AT VARIOUS POTENTIOMETER SPEED.
EQUIPMENTS USED:
Chemical reactor service unit equipped with;
Reagent tanks
Temperature and conductivity sensors
DEMONSTRATIONS
TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION
Took the temperature sensor, plugged it in chemical reactor service unit and switched on
the temperature reading meter. Kept the sensor in air for few minutes to measure the
room temperature. Then put the sensor in water for a minute to measure the water
temperature. Temperature was shown on the temperature meter on the service unit.
CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION
Plugged the conductivity sensor into the service unit and switched on. Took a beaker and
filled with water. Put the sensor in plain water and measured the conductivity displayed on
the conductivity meter on the service unit.
Then made a salt solution in water in the beaker. Put the conductivity sensor in the salt
solution and then measured the conductivity. Noted the difference between the
conductivity of plain water and that of salt solution.
3
OBSERVATION AND CALCULATIONS
TEMPERATURE CALIBRATION
CONDUCTIVITY CALIBRATION
4
Experiment no 03
Demonstration of Batch Reactor
A batch reactor is a simple reactor that holds the components which reacts to form a
product.
SPRING COIL
The reactor is equipped with stainless steel coil to which water
circulator of chemical reactor service unit is connected. This coil is
used for maintaining the temperature throughout the process.
AGITATOR
There is a propeller agitator in the reactor which is used for heat transfer and provides
good mixing of reacting components.
DEMONSTRATION CAPABILITIES
Batch reactor is designed to determine the reaction rate constant as well as
various changes to process conditions such as reaction temperature,
concentration, heat rate etc.
The reactor is designed in such a way that no reagent should be used to carry
out reactions because of material of construction of reactants, temperature and
pressure.
5
EXPERIMENT NO 4
Objective:
TO DERIVE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONDUCTIVITY AND CONCENTRATION FOR
BATCH SPONIFICATION OF ETHYL ACETATE.
EQUIPMENTS USE
Batch reactor fitted on chemical reactor service unit
Beakers,
flasks and
pipette for preparing the solutions
CHEMICALS USED
REACTION INVOLVED
PROCEDURE
Prepared 0.1 molar solution of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate each. After that, put 0.1M
ethyl acetate solution in the batch reactor. Noted the initial readings. Then put 0.1 M sodium
hydroxide solution in the batch reactor and started it. Started the stop watch as the NaOH
solution was poured into the reactor. Noted the conductivity readings after every two minutes
i-e regular interval of time.
Kept on taking the reading until the conductivity become constant. When the conductivity
become constant, then stopped the process. Noted all the experimental data.
Then calculated the concentration at any time’t’ is given by,
Where
CA (t) = concentration at any time t
CA (0) = initial concentration
K (t) = conductivity at any time t
K (0) = initial conductivity
K (∞) = conductivity at time t=∞
6
OBSERVATIONS AND CALCULATIONS
1. NaOH SOLUTION
7
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
S.NO Time(sec) Conductivity CA XA
1 0 9.44 0.1 0
2 2 7.66 0.066914 0.330855
3 4 6.58 0.04684 0.531599
4 6 5.97 0.035502 0.644981
5 8 5.57 0.028067 0.719331
6 10 5.3 0.023048 0.769517
7 12 5.09 0.019145 0.80855
8 14 4.93 0.016171 0.83829
9 16 4.8 0.013755 0.862454
10 18 4.71 0.012082 0.879182
11 20 4.62 0.010409 0.895911
12 22 4.55 0.009108 0.908922
13 24 4.49 0.007993 0.920074
14 26 4.44 0.007063 0.929368
15 28 4.4 0.00632 0.936803
16 30 4.36 0.005576 0.944238
17 32 4.33 0.005019 0.949814
18 34 4.3 0.004461 0.95539
19 36 4.27 0.003903 0.960967
20 38 4.25 0.003532 0.964684
21 40 4.23 0.00316 0.968401
22 42 4.21 0.002788 0.972119
23 44 4.2 0.002602 0.973978
24 46 4.18 0.00223 0.977695
25 48 4.17 0.002045 0.979554
26 50 4.16 0.001859 0.981413
27 52 4.14 0.001487 0.98513
28 54 4.13 0.001301 0.986989
29 56 4.12 0.001115 0.988848
30 58 4.11 0.000929 0.990706
31 60 4.11 0.000929 0.990706
32 62 4.1 0.000743 0.992565
33 64 4.09 0.000558 0.994424
34 66 4.09 0.000558 0.994424
35 68 4.08 0.000372 0.996283
36 70 4.07 0.000186 0.998141
37 72 4.07 0.000186 0.998141
38 74 4.07 0.000186 0.998141
39 76 4.06 0 1
40 78 4.06 0 1
42 80 4.06 0 1
8
CONCENTRATION vs. CONDUCTIVITY
9
CONCETRATION vs. TIME
RESULTS
The following relation ships have been obtained
1. The concentration decreases as the conductivity decrease so there is a direct
relation ship between concentration and conductivity.
2. The conversion increases as the conductivity decrease so there is an inverse
relation ship between conversion and conductivity.
3. The conductivity decreases with respect to time.
10
EXPERIMENT NO 05
TO DETERMINE THE ORDER AND RATE CONSTANT FOR BATCH SPONIFICATION OF
ETHYL ACETATE
EQUIPMENTS USED
Batch reactor fitted on chemical reactor service unit
Beakers, flasks and pipette for preparing the solutions
CHEMICALS USED
0.1 M NaOH of 0.5 L solution
0.1 M CH3COOC2H5 of 0.5 L solution
REACTION INVOLVED
The reaction involved is the batch sponification of ethyl acetate.
PROCEDURE
Prepared 0.1 molar solution of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate each. After that, put ethyl
acetate solution in the batch reactor. Noted the initial readings. Then put 0.1 M sodium
hydroxide solution in the batch reactor and started it. Started the stop watch as the NaOH
solution poured into the reactor. Noted the conductivity readings after every two minutes i-e
regular interval of time.
Keep on taking the reading until the conductivity become constant. When the conductivity
become constant, then stopped the process. Noted all the experimental data.
Then calculated the concentration at any time’t’ is given by,
Where
CA (t) = concentration at any time t CA (0) = initial concentration
K (t) = conductivity at any time t K (0) = initial conductivity
K (∞) = conductivity at time t=∞
Here the method used is the differential method; According to this method;
1. Determined the concentration at each time interval and obtained a concentration
data.
2. Plotted time vs. concentration data on x and y-axis respectively.
3. Carefully drawn a smooth curve among the points obtained by the time vs.
11
concentration data.
4. Drawn tangents at each point. That tangents represented the rate of reaction at those
points.
5. Then used the nth order rate equation;
n
-rA = kC A
Or
log (-rA) = log (k) + n.log (CA)
6. Then put the data of log (-rA) and log (CA) on y and x-axis respectively.
7. Drawn a straight line among the possible data points.
12
38 4.24 0.002292769
40 4.22 0.001940035
42 4.21 0.001763668
44 4.2 0.001587302
46 4.19 0.001410935
48 4.18 0.001234568
50 4.17 0.001058201
52 4.16 0.000881834
54 4.15 0.000705467
56 4.15 0.000705467
58 4.14 0.000529101
60 4.14 0.000529101
62 4.13 0.000352734
64 4.13 0.000352734
66 4.12 0.000176367
68 4.12 0.000176367
70 4.12 0.000176367
72 4.11 0
74 4.11 0
76 4.11 0
78 4.11 0
13
Selecting the points
Time 0 2 10 20 30 40
Concentration 0.1 0.054497354 0.018165879 0.00776 0.00388 0.00194
T CA rA Log(CA) Log(-rA)
0 0.1 (0.1-0.028)/(0-2) = - 0.036 -1 -1.444
2 0.054497354 (0.076-0.012)/(0-6) = -0.0107 -1.2636 -1.97
10 0.018165879 (0.024-0.004)/(7-18) = - 0.00182 -1.741 -2.74
20 0.0076 (0.014-0.002)/(10-28) = - 0.00067 -2.11 -3.174
30 0.00388 (0.01-0)/(10-40) = - 0.00033 -2.41 -3.48
40 0.00194 (0.004-0)/(26-50) = -0.000167 -2.512 -3.78
14
The first three points seems to be in straight line so,
Slope = n = (y2 – y1)/(x2 – x1)
Here
x1 = 0 and x2 = -1.741
y1 = 0.41 and y2 = -2.74
Thus,
Slope n = (-2.74-0.41) / (-1.741 – 0)
So n = 1.81
And intercept is,
log(k) = 0.41
k = 2.57
Thus, rate constant = k = 2.57 and order = n = 1.81
So we have equation as,
1.81
-rA = 2.57 CA
15
Experiment No 06
The vessel is constructed from borosilicate glass and PVC with stainless steel heat transfer coil
and removable reactor baffle.
GLANDS
PILLARS
The vessel is mounted on a PVC base plate through the pillars which fits directly onto the
service unit.
16
DEMONSTRATION CAPABILITIES:
17
EXPERIMENT NO 7
TO DETERMINE THE ORDER AND RATE CONSTANT FOR
SPONIFICATION OF ETHYL ACETATE USING CONTINUOUS
STIRRED TANK REACTOR
EQUIPMENTS USED
Continuous stirred tank (CSTR) reactor fitted on chemical reactor service unit
Beakers, flasks and pipette for preparing the solutions
CHEMICALS USED
0.1 M NaOH of 0.5 L solution
0.1 M CH3COOC2H5 of 0.5 L solution
REACTION INVOLVED
The reaction involved is the sponification of ethyl acetate.
PROCEDURE
Prepared 0.1 molar solution of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate each. After that, put NaOH
solution in the CSTR. Noted the initial readings. Then put 0.1 M ethyl acetate solution in the
reagent tank. Started the peristaltic pump so that the ethyl acetate solution transfers into the
CSTR and at the same time, started the stop watch. Noted the conductivity readings after every
two minutes i-e regular interval of time.
Kept on taking the reading until the conductivity become constant. . When the conductivity
become constant, then stopped the process. Noted all the experimental data.
Where
CA (t) = concentration at any time t
CA (0) = initial concentration
K (t) = conductivity at any time t
K (0) = initial conductivity
K (∞) = conductivity at time t=∞
18
DETERMINATION OF ORDER AND RATE CONSTANT
Here the method used for the determination of rate constant and order is the half life
method;
According to this method;
1. Determine the concentration at each time interval and obtain a concentration
data.
2. Plot time vs. concentration data on x and y-axis respectively.
3. Draw a smooth curve among the points obtained by the time vs. concentration
data.
4. Use the half life equation as:
tf = ((0.5)1-n-1) CAo1-n
k (n-1)
5. Then pick CAo = 0.05, 0.04, 0.02, 0.01 and 0.006 and fill in the table (table-A) in
the calculations.
6. Next, plot log tf, vs. log CAo, and find the required slope and rate constant.
19
40 5.97 0.000264317
42 5.96 0.000176211
44 5.96 0.000176211
46 5.95 8.81057E-05
48 5.95 8.81057E-05
50 5.94 0
52 5.94 0
54 5.94 0
56 5.94 0
20
TABLE A:
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.05 0.025 6 – 3.6 = 2.4 -1.3 0.38
0.04 0.02 7.2 – 4.5 = 2.7 -1.3979 0.43
21
0.02 0.01 12 – 7.2 = 4.8 -1.6989 0.68
0.01 0.005 20 – 12 = 8 -2 0.903
0.006 0.003 27- 18 = 9 -2.222 0.954
22
Now, Here
So 1 - n = - 0.7
And n = 1.7
And intercept is,
log (((0.5)1-n-1)/ k.(n-1)) = -0.7
Thus k = 4.47
23
Experiment no 08
TO FIND THE EFFECT OF INADEQUATE MIXING ON REACTION RATE USING
STIRRED REACTOR WITH BAFFLE
EQUIPMENTS USED
Continuous stirred tank (CSTR) reactor fitted on chemical reactor service unit
Beakers, flasks and pipette for preparing the solutions
CHEMICALS USED
0.1 M NaOH of 0.5 L solution
0.1 M CH3COOC2H5 of 0.5 L solution
REACTION INVOLVED
PROCEDURE
Prepared 0.1 molar solution of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate each. After that, put NaOH
solution in the CSTR. Noted the initial readings. Then put 0.1 M ethyl acetate solution in the
reagent tank. Started the peristaltic pump so that the ethyl acetate solution transfers into the
CSTR and at the same time, start the stop watch. Note the conductivity readings after every
two minutes i-e regular interval of time.
Keep on taking the reading until the conductivity become constant. When the conductivity
becomes constant, then stopped the process. Note all the experimental data.
24
CASE 1: OBSERVATIONS & CALCULATIONS
25
CASE 1: DETERMINATION OF REACTION RATE AT ANY TIME ‘t’:
Time(min) CA rA -rA
12 0.006784141 (0.017 - 0)/(0 - 19.5) = -8.72*10-4 8.72*10-4
14 0.005286344 (0.0142 - 0)/(0 - 22) = -6.45*10-4 6.45*10-4
16 0.004140969 (0.012 - 0)/(0 - 24) = -5*10-4 5.0*10-4
26
CASE 2: UnStirred Reactor with Baffle
Repeated the same procedure as for case1, but in this case did not switch on the stirrer.
Performed the experiment without stirrer and with baffle.
27
CASE 2: DETERMINATION OF REACTION RATE AT ANY TIME ‘t’:
Time(min) CA rA -rA
12 0.004992076 (0.015 - 0)/(0 - 17.5) = -8.57*10-4 8.57*10-4
14 0.00340729 (0.012 - 0)/(0 – 19.2) = -6.25*10-4 6.25*10-4
16 0.002377179 (0.009 - 0)/(0 – 21.2) = -4.25*10-4 4.25*10-4
28
CASE 3: UnStirred Reactor with No Baffle
Repeat the same procedure as for case1, but in this case did not switch on the stirrer
and removed the baffle also. Performed the experiment without stirrer and with no baffle.
29
Time(min) CA rA -rA
12 0.003931204 (0.012 - 0)/(0 - 17.4) = -6.89*10-4 6.89*10-4
14 0.002866503 (0.0095 - 0)/(0 – 19) = -5.0*10-4 5.0*10-4
16 0.002047502 (0.0071 - 0)/(0 – 21) = -3.38*10-4 3.38*10-4
CONCLUSION
From the three experiments, we have the data as
RESULTS
Here it has been concluded from the results of three experiments that at all time intervals
-rA of CASE 1 > -rA of CASE 2 > -rA of CASE 3
the rate of reaction decreases.
30
EXPERIMENT NO 09
TO FIND THE EFFECT OF FLOW RATE ON REACTION RATE USING
CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR
EQUIPMENTS USED
Continuous stirred tank (CSTR) reactor fitted on chemical reactor service unit
Beakers,
flasks and
pipette for preparing the solutions
CHEMICALS USED
REACTION INVOLVED
PROCEDURE
Prepared 0.1 molar solution of sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate each. After that, put
0.1 M NaOH solution in the CSTR. Noted the initial readings. Then put 0.1 M ethyl acetate
solution in the reagent tank. Sat the potentiometer speed to some value .Started the peristaltic
pump so that the ethyl acetate solution transferred into the CSTR and at the same time, started
the stop watch. Noted the conductivity readings after every two minutes i- e regular interval of
time.
Kept on taking the reading until the conductivity become constant. When the conductivity
become constant, then stopped the process. Noted all the experimental data.
Then calculated the concentration at any time’t’ is given by,
Where
31
FAo -rA
V= xA But FAo = CAo.V0
Similarly repeated the same procedure for different potentiometer speeds and
finally observed the effect of flow rate on rate of reaction.
Now
32
CASE 2: When potentiometer speed set at 8
Now
33
22 5.96 0.001980198 0.98019802
24 5.89 0.001350135 0.98649865
26 5.83 0.000810081 0.99189919
28 5.78 0.000360036 0.99639964
30 5.74 0 1
Now
CONCLUSION
RESULTS
Here it has been concluded from the results of three experiments that at all time intervals
-rA of CASE 1 < -rA of CASE 2 < -rA of CASE 3
By increasing flow rate, the rate of reaction increases
34
Experiment No 10
Demonstration of Tubular Reactor
DESCRIPTION
Tubular Reactor or 'plug flow' reactor is in the form of a tube wrapped in a spiral around an
acrylic former which is enclosed in a transparent tank.
Water at a controlled temperature is circulated within the tank, this maintains the reactants at
constant temperatures.
Reagents are separately piped to the reactor through quick release fittings mounted on the lid.
Reagents are pre-heated in stainless steel coils before being mixed and loaded into the reactor
coil.
HEATING COILS
Two pre-heat coils bring the reactants up to the reaction temperature separately
before they are mixed in a Y piece after which the reaction begins.
SENSORS
35
Performance is monitored by a conductivity sensor mounted in a flow cell at the
end of the reactor coil.
FITTINGS
Quick release fittings are used for process and service connections to enable
quick mounting and removal from the service unit.
DEMONSTRATION CAPABILITIES:
36
Experiment No 11
APPARATUS
Plug Flow Reactor
Working Principle
THEORY
One or more fluid reagents are pumped through a pipe or tube and it also consists of a sensor. The
pipes or tubes are characterized by continuous gradients of concentration in the direction of flow.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
PROCEDURE:
● Made a solution (0.1M) of NaOH and ethyl acetate
● Switched on the apparatus and calibrate it
● Poured both solutions into their inlets and set T.
● When they come constantly with each other the product will form and flow through
the tubes.
● Note the initial conductivity.
● Find concentration
● Using a half-life method to find tf.
37
DIMENSIONS:
● Reactor Dimension
● Preheat coils each total length = 1.2m, reactor coil = 0, internal dia = 4.9mm,
● reactor coil id = 5mm, total volume of coil = 0.02L, reactor coil volume = 0.41 L.
CHEMICALS:
PRECAUTIONS
FORMULA
GRAPH:
Graphs between CAo and log of Tf also shows indirect relation through a straight line.
The reciprocal of the rate of the reaction increases exponentially with concentration.
Hence the rate of the reaction decreases exponentially with concentration.
38
Conclusion
In this experiment a saponification reaction of ethyl acetate and sodium hydroxide was
carried out in a plug flow reactor and a change in Concentration (in terms of Electrical
Conductivity) was measured with time at room temperatures of 250C. At each
conductivity, different values of concentration were obtained. The results shown that the
rate of the reaction decreased exponentially with concentration.
39