Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUSS 420 Strategic Management Notes
BUSS 420 Strategic Management Notes
BUSS 420 Strategic Management Notes
Rationale
This course in Strategic Management has two aims: to draw together the various strands
of a business course to provide a holistic view of the business organization, and to
develop a strategic perspective of business management. This course is designed to
capture the fundamentals of the strategy process, incorporating analytically driven
analyses, strategy formulation and implementation. This course is structured to equip
students with the necessary theoretical and practical skills to enable them to think
strategically and apply strategically-driven analytical tools within the context of real-
world settings.
Learning Outcomes
This unit aims to demonstrate the application of strategic analysis in an effort to improve
firm performance. On completion of this unit, students should be able to:
i. Understand the fundamental concepts underlying the study of business strategy
and the elements of the strategic management process;
ii. Understand the role of strategy in matching an organisation’s resources,
capabilities and competencies with its environment in both static and dynamic
contexts;
iii. Understand the processes of strategy analysis, development and implementation,
especially those processes of strategic management that may lead to success;
iv. Knowledge on the implementation of strategy within the organisation, and the
relevance of firm culture within the context of organisational operation;
v. Practical application of the analytical concepts taught within class in the analysis
and development of strategy for a business organization.
Coursework 40%
Examination 60%
Total 100%
Course Texts
1. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy:
Texts & Cases; 8th Ed. Prentice Hall International; United Kingdom.
2. Pearce and Robinson (2007): Strategic Management, 5th edition Mc Graw-Hill,
New York.
3. Thompson, A.A., & Strickland, A.J. (2001). Strategic Management (12th ed.). Boston:
McGraw-Hill Irwin.
4. Wheelen, T.L., & Hunger, J.D. (2000). Strategic Management and Business Policy
(7th ed.). MA: Addison Wesley.
5. Hubbard, U., Morkel, A., Devenport, S., & Beamish, P. (2006). Cases in Strategic
Management. Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson Education.
6. David, F. (1999) Strategic Management, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
7. De Wit, R. & Meyer, R. (2004). Strategy Process, Content, Context; 3rd Ed.
Thompson: Australia.
8. Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, J. & Ghoshal, S. (2003). The Strategy Process:
Concepts, Contexts and Cases. Prentice Hall: United States.
9. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari. Prentice Hall:
Australia.
10. Davis, J. & Devinney, T. (1997). The Essence of Corporate Strategy: Theory for
Modern Decision Making. Allen & Unwin: Australia.
11. Grant, R. (1998). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques,
Applications. Blackwell Publications: United States.
12. Norman, R. & Ramirez, R. (1998). Designing Interactive Strategy: From Value
Chain to Value Constellation. John Wiley Publications: United Kingdom.
13. Ansoff, H. Igor, (1969) Business Strategy. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.
Hierarchy/Levels of strategies
ii. Business strategy. It usually occurs at the business unit or product level and it
emphasizes improvement of the competitive position of a corporation's products or
services in the specific industry or marketing segment served by that business unit. It
may fit within two overall categories of competitive or corporate strategies.
Competitive strategy is the strategy battle against all competitors for advantage.
Michael Porter developed three competitive strategies called Generic strategies. They
are cost leadership, differentiation and focus. Cooperative strategy is to work with
one or more competitors to gain advantage against other competitors.
iii. Functional strategy. It is the approach taken by a functional area to achieve
corporate and business unit objectives and strategies by maximizing resource
productivity. It is concerned with developing nurturing a distinctive competence to
provide a company or business unit with a competitive advantage.
Features/Components of a strategy
i. Focus. A company chooses to invest only on a few selected factors while making
its value offering, rather than diffusing its efforts across all key factors of
competition. It can, thereby, control the costs. When a company’s value curve
lacks focus, its cost structure will tend to be high and its business model complex in
implementation and execution.
ii. Divergent. This depicts a company’s profile that is differentiated from the
industry’s average profile and thus confirms uniqueness. When it lacks divergence,
a company’s strategy is a me-too, with no reason to stand apart in the market
place.
iii. Compelling tagline. This delivers a clear message about the exceptional cost-value
offering and generates interest among the buyers. When the strategy lacks a
i. Strategic management takes into account the future and anticipates for it.
ii. A strategy is made on rational and logical manner, thus its efficiency and its success
are ensured.
iii. Strategic management reduces frustration because it has been planned in such a
way that it follows a procedure.
iv. It brings growth in the organization because it seeks opportunities.
v. Strategic management also adds to the reputation of the organization because of
consistency that results from organizations success.
vi. Often companies draw to a close because of lack of proper strategy to run it. With
strategic management companies can foresee the events in future and that’s why
they can remain stable in the market.
vii. Strategic management looks at the threats present in the external environment and
thus companies can either work to get rid of them or else neutralizes the threats in
such a way that they become an opportunity for their success.
viii. Strategic management focuses on proactive approach which enables organization
to grasp every opportunity that is available in the market in today’s businesses,
the right approach and management of the company’s employees can
greatly affect the company’s overall performance.
The primary purpose of strategic management process is to help the organization achieve
a sustainable strategic competition in the market. When properly conceived and
implemented, SMP creates value for the organization by focusing on and assessing
opportunities and threats, then leveraging its strengths and weaknesses to help it survive,
grow, and expand as well as . Strategic management process can help a business achieve
this by:
There are five strategic management process steps that must be followed in their
chronological order.
i. Goal setting. This is essentially clarifying the organization’s vision. The vision will
include short-term and long-term objectives, the processes by which they can be
accomplished, and the persons responsible for implementing each task that
culminates in the set goals.
ii. Analysis. Analysis involves gathering the data and information that is relevant to
accomplishing the set goals. It also covers understanding the needs of the business
in the market and examining any internal and external data that may affect the
organization’s goals.
iii. Strategy Formulation. A business will only succeed if it has the resources required
to reach the goals set in the first step. The process of formulating a strategy to
These components are steps that are carried, in chronological order, when creating a new
strategic management plan. Present businesses that have already created a strategic
management plan will revert to these steps as per the situation’s requirement, so as to
make essential changes.
i. The Plan Phase of the Strategic Management Process. The first part of the strategic
management process involves figuring out what you want to accomplish, and
how you're going to get there. This entails high level goal setting that will result in
vision statement, focus areas and corporate level strategic objectives. Plan phase
also requires adequate strategic analysis & understanding of the firm environment
that facilitates in-depth strategy formulation.
ii. The Manage Phase of the Strategic Management Process. In the management
phase, there is need for Strategic Governance where there are clear Meeting
Structures as well as Strategy Reporting. This phase requires adequate Strategic
Communication that addresses organizational Strategy Culture, Performance
Management and Common Pitfalls of Strategic Implementation.
iii. The Track Phase of Strategic Management. This is a phase where check and
balances are put in place to track progress against strategic outcomes, implement
Many companies and marketing managers have dedicated staff for strategy formulation.
It is a very important process for the company, as it tells the future direction which the
company has to take and the way that the company can succeed. The 10 school of
thoughts tell us how Strategy formulation can be done, and what are the various ways
that you can formulate a strategy.
1. The design school. In this thought process of strategy formulation, the focus is on
conception of ideas and to design new ideas.
The company does an internal analysis with the help of SWOT analysis
The company then tries to match its internal strength with the market strength
which is required.
2. The planning school. In this case, the thought process runs towards planning the
entire strategy in a rigorous manner, so that the firm advances forward.
The complete process and the plan which the company will implement is
documented from the start to finish.
At all times the plan is referred to whenever the management wants to take new
decisions.
With the plan in hand, the management gets a clear direction to move in,
helping the company to move forward unanimously.
The issue arises in the planning school of thoughts when anything happens out of
plan. If you have planned for years in advance, and any new competitor pops up,
or any external business variable is changed, then the complete plan gets affected.
Hence, proper prediction is most essential when using the planning school of
thought.
Again, in the positioning school of thought, the strategy assumes the market as it is,
and does not take into consideration future entrants or change in business
environment. Like the planning strategy, the positioning of school of thought can
also fail if there are major changes in the business environment.
4. The entrepreneurial school. This school of thought puts all the focus on the CEO of
the company. Most observed in small businesses which want to make it large, or
even large corporations which trust their leaders (Steve jobs, Mark zuckerberg), in
this strategic process, the company follows whatever the CEO says.
In this case, the CEO needs to be visionary, needs strong leadership skill, and has
to have the right judgement and direction.
This strategy has been proven right in very few cases over the years where the
leaders were legendary by themselves. Steve jobs, Bill gates, Mark Zuckerberg
are all examples of people who have grown companies to astounding
proportions due to their leadership skills.
The problem with this management school of thought is a single one. How do you
find such a leader? If you want to design your marketing strategy based on the
recommendations by the leader of the company, then this leader can be wrong as
well. And you need someone who is very strong on the business front and is
dynamic to make the necessary changes.
5. The cognitive school. In this thought process, people’s perception and information
is studied. Wherein, you can better your business by understanding your customers.
The problem with the cognitive model is that it is not practical beyond a certain
point. A top company cannot rely on surveys alone to find new ideas or to make
connections with their customers, because it has become a mass company by that
time. Cognitive reasoning cannot be done at a mass stage. Moreover, innovations
are brought when you think of products which the customers have not thought of
which is not possible in the cognitive school of thought. Because you are only
improving on the things which your customers perceive.
6. The learning school. In this thought process, the management keeps a watch over
what has already happened and then forms the future strategy looking at the past.
It might not necessarily look at its own past. It might look at the way things worked
for some other company, or how some other company failed. And then decide on
which strategy to implement and which one to ignore.
The company looks at things that worked and tries to implement the same
thing over time with the assumption that it will work again.
The company also looks at things that did not work in its favor (or in favor of
a competitor who tried the same thing), and discards such things / processes.
More than a strategy, the learning school of thought looks like maneuvering or
guiding the company on the basis of the previous road that has gone by. We all
know its not a good decision because the road can change at any time. Hence this
thought process is not at all useful at time of crisis, nor does it help in creating
something outstanding. This strategy can be used when the firm is stable, and wants
to work on auto mode while it develops something else in the meantime.
The problem with the power school happens when the powerful people stop
listening to feedback or stop implementing measures of improvement, and only
focus on minor improvements. At such times, the power needs to change hands so
that the company keeps moving forward.
8. The cultural school. The cultural school of thought says that the company has a
fantastic capital in terms of its human capital as well as its social capital. A positive
culture in the firm can give a proper direction to the firm.
The cultural school tries to involve many different departments within a
company.
It is most useful during mergers and acquisitions.
It emphasizes the role of social values, beliefs and culture in decision making
There can be resistance to the cultural school as the same people whom we are
trying to unite, might not like the idea of change, due to which they become
united and the company moves in the opposite direction. Moreover, even if you
have got the people united, and have built a strong culture, your direction still
remains unclear.
Obviously, this thought process depends on the situation, and is used when there
is total dependence on environmental factors.
10. The Configuration school. One of the most preferred amongst the 10 School of
thoughts is the configuration school. It basically says, that the strategy needs to be
configured. The strategy allows the firm to move from one position to another,
hence a simple set of values will not help this movement.
As per the configuration school, strategy needs to consider a lot of thing which
can go wrong, and cannot be derived from simple set of values.
Over a period of time, an organization forms various sets of values which have
to be transformed so that the organization reaches the point that it desires.
To do this, the organizations stable business might need to be disrupted, and
the organization has to be configured so that it reaches the success it was
looking for.
Hence, the name configuration school, so that the organization is configured
over and over again unless it reaches the desired result.
Formulating a company mission statement may take the following two steps.
Mission statements can and do vary in length, content, format and specificity. Most
practitioners and academicians of strategic management consider an effectively written
mission statement to exhibit nine characteristics or mission statement components. Since
a mission statement is often the most visible and public part of the strategic management
process, it is important that it include most, if not all, of these essential
components. Components and corresponding questions that a mission statement should
answer are given here.
A mission statement defines the basic reason for the existence of that organisation. Such a
statement reflects the corporate philosophy, identity, character,
and image of an organisation. It may be defined explicitly or could be deduced from the
management's actions, decisions, or the chief executive's press statements. When explicitly
defined it provides enlightenment to the insiders and outsiders on what the organisation
stands for. In order to be effective, a mission statement should possess the following
seven characteristics.
i. It should be feasible. A mission should always aim high but it should not be an
impossible statement. It should be realistic and achievable. its followers must find
it to be credible. But feasibility depends on the resources available to work
towards a mission.
ii. It should be precise. A mission statement should not be so narrow as to restrict the
organization’s activities nor should it be too broad to make itself meaningless. For
instance, 'Manufacturing bicycles' is a narrow mission statement since it severely
limits the organization’s activities, while mobility business' is too broad a term as it
does not define the reasonable contour within which the organisation could
operate.
iii. It should be clear. A mission should be clear enough to lead to action. It should
not be a high sounding set of platitudes meant for publicity purposes. Many
organizations do adopt such statements but probably they do so for emphasizing
their identity and character. To be useful, a mission statement should be clear
enough to lead to action.
iv. It should be motivating. A mission statement should be motivating for members of
the organisation and of society, and they should feel it worthwhile working for
such an organisation or being its customers. A bank, which lays great emphasis on
customer service, is likely to motivate its employees to serve its customers well
Goals establish where you intend to go and tell you when you get there. They
help improve your overall effectiveness as a company, whether you want to
increase your share of the market, for example, or improve your customer service.
The more carefully you define your goals, the more likely you are to do the right
things and achieve what you wanted to accomplish in the first place.
Objectives are the specific steps you and your company need to take in order to
reach each of your goals. They specify what you must do and when.
Goal Objective
Corporate objectives are those that relate to the business as a whole. They are usually
set by the top management of the business and they provide the focus for setting more
detailed objectives for the main functional activities of the business.
Corporate objectives tend to focus on the desired performance and results of the
business. It is important that corporate objectives cover a range of key areas where the
business wants to achieve results rather than focusing on a single objective. As suggested
by Peter Drucker, corporate objectives should cover eight key areas.
Area example
Many business textbooks suggest that both corporate and functional objectives need to
conform to a set of criteria referred to as an acronym SMART.
i. The Resource Based View of The Firm. This model defines resources broadly to
include all assets that a firm can draw upon when formulating and
implementing strategy. The model has two major assumptions;
Resource heterogeneity. This means that bundles of resources and
capabilities differ across firms. The insight that the resource-based view
Tangible resources. These refer to all the resources that have a physical form.
They are the easiest to value and often are the only resources that appear on
a firm’s balance sheet. They include real estate, production facilities, and raw
materials, among others. Although tangible resources may be essential to a
firm’s strategy, because of their standard nature, they are only occasionally a
source of competitive advantage.
Intangible resources. These refer to all the assets that are not physical in
nature. They include; company reputations, brand names, cultures, technical
knowledge, patents and trademarks, and accumulated learning and
experience. These assets often play important roles in competitive advantage
or otherwise and the firm’s value.
Organizational capabilities. They are the complex combinations of both
tangible and intangible resources. Finely sharpened capabilities can be a
source of competitive advantage. The list of organizational capabilities
includes a set of abilities describing efficiency and effectiveness, more
responsive, higher quality, and so forth that can be found in any one of the
firm’s activities, from product to development, to marketing, to
manufacturing.
Resources
Capabilities Competencies Competitive
Intangible Advantage
Resources
These activities support the primary functions above. In our diagram, the dotted lines
show that each support, or secondary, activity can play a role in each primary activity.
For example, procurement supports operations with certain activities, but it also supports
marketing and sales with other activities.
Procurement (purchasing) – This is what the organization does to get the
resources it needs to operate. This includes finding vendors and negotiating
best prices.
Human resource management – This is how well a company recruits, hires,
trains, motivates, rewards, and retains its workers. People are a significant
source of value, so businesses can create a clear advantage with good HR
practices.
Technological development – These activities relate to managing and
processing information, as well as protecting a company's knowledge base.
Minimizing information technology costs, staying current with technological
advances, and maintaining technical excellence are sources of value creation.
Infrastructure – These are a company's support systems, and the functions
that allow it to maintain daily operations. Accounting, legal, administrative,
and general management are examples of necessary infrastructure that
businesses can use to their advantage.
The value chain is a very flexible strategy tool for looking at your business, your
competitors and the respective places in the industry’s value system.
The value chain can be used to diagnose and create competitive advantages on
both cost and differentiation.
It helps you to understand the organisation issues involved with the promise of
making customer value commitments and promises because it focuses attention
on the activities needed to deliver the value proposition.
Comparing your business model with your competitors using the value chain can
give you a much deeper understanding of your strengths and weaknesses to be
included in your SWOT analysis.
The value chain is well known and has been a mainstay of strategy teaching in
business schools for the last 35 years.
It can be adapted for any type of business such as manufacturing, retailing or
services, big or small ventures etc.
The value chain has developed into an extra model, the industry value chain or
value system which lets you get a better understanding of the much broader
competitive arena.
Macro environment factors are uncontrollable external forces that affect how a
business operates. They are largely out of the control of the business, and often
require changes in operating, management, production, and marketing. Analysts
often categorize them using the acronyms PEST or PESTEL. Broken down, PEST
stands for political, economic, social, and technological concerns. PESTEL also
includes environmental and legal factors.
The industry environment refers to the exterior forces which cannot be controlled
by management but may have a significant impact on the success of
the product offering including existing competition, the threat of new
competition, price competitiveness, changes in consumer tastes and economic fact
ors.
Porter's five forces of competitive position analysis were developed in 1979 by Michael
E. Porter of Harvard Business School as a simple framework for assessing and evaluating
the competitive strength and position of a business organisation. This theory is based on
the concept that there are five forces which determine the competitive intensity and
attractiveness of a market. Porter’s five forces help to identify where power lies in a
business situation. This is useful both in understanding the strength of an organization’s
current competitive position, and the strength of a position that an organisation may
look to move into. Strategic analysts often use Porter’s five forces to understand whether
new products or services are potentially profitable. By understanding where power lies,
the theory can also be used to identify areas of strength, to improve weaknesses and to
avoid mistakes
i. Identifying WHO your best customer is. Customer analysis can help you identify
who your customer is and thereby improve the segmentation targeting
and positioning process. Remember 80% of your business will come from 20% of
your customers. It is important you know who those customers can be.
hiring activity
R & D projects
capital investments
promotional campaigns
strategic partnerships
mergers and acquisitions
iv. Competitor’s capabilities. Knowledge of the competitor’s assumptions, objectives,
and current strategy is useful in understanding how the competitor might want to
respond to a competitive attack. However, its resources and capabilities determine
the ability to respond effectively. A competitor’s capabilities can be analyzed
according to its strength and weakness in various functional areas, as is done in a
SWOT analysis. The competitor’s strengths define its capabilities. The analysis can
be taken further to evaluate the competitor’s ability to increase its capabilities in
certain areas. A financial analysis can be performed to reveal its sustainable growth
rate. Since the competitive environment is dynamic, the competitor’s ability to
react swiftly to change should be evaluated. Some firms have heavy momentum
and continue for many years in the same direction before adapting. Others are
able to mobilize and adapt very quickly. Factors that slow a company down
include low cash reserves, large investments in fixed assets, and an organizational
structure that hinders quick action.
v. Competitor response profile. Information from an analysis of the competitor’s
objectives, assumptions, strategy, and capabilities can be compiled into a response
profile of possible moves that might be made by the competitor. This profile
includes both potential offensive and defensive moves. The specific moves and
their expected strength can be estimated using information gleaned from the
analysis. The result of the competitor analysis should be an improved ability to
Michael Porter identified two basic types of competitive advantage that organizations
can accrue.
iii. Liquidation Strategies- Liquidation strategy means closing down the entire firm
and selling its assets. It is considered the most extreme and the last resort because
it leads to serious consequences such as loss of employment for employees,
termination of opportunities where a firm could pursue any future activities, and
the stigma of failure. Liquidation strategy may be unpleasant as a strategic
alternative but when a "dead business is worth more than alive", it is a good
proposition. For instance, the real estate owned by a firm may fetch it more
money than the actual returns of doing business. Liquidation strategy may be
difficult as buyers for the business may be difficult to find. Moreover, the firm
Portfolio Management Strategies refer to the approaches that are applied for the efficient
portfolio management in order to generate the highest possible returns at lowest possible
risks. The following are basic approaches/models for portfolio evaluation;
i. BCG model. BCG matrix BCG matrix is a framework created by Boston Consulting
Group to evaluate the strategic position of the business brand portfolio and its
potential. It classifies business portfolio into four categories based on industry
attractiveness (growth rate of that industry) and competitive position (relative
market share).
Relative market share. One of the dimensions used to evaluate business
portfolio is relative market share. Higher corporate’s market share
results in higher cash returns. This is because a firm that produces more,
benefits from higher economies of scale and experience curve, which
results in higher profits. Nonetheless, it is worth to note that some firms
may experience the same benefits with lower production outputs and
lower market share.
Market growth rate. High market growth rate means higher earnings
and sometimes profits but it also consumes lots of cash, which is used as
investment to stimulate further growth. Therefore, business units that
operate in rapid growth industries are cash users and are worth
Dogs. Dogs hold low market share compared to competitors and operate
in a slowly growing market. In general, they are not worth investing in
because they generate low or negative cash returns. But this is not always
the truth. Some dogs may be profitable for long period of time, they may
provide synergies for other brands or SBUs or simple act as a defense to
counter competitors moves. Therefore, it is always important to perform
deeper analysis of each brand or SBU to make sure they are not worth
investing in or have to be divested. Strategic choices: Retrenchment,
divestiture, liquidation
Cash cows. Cash cows are the most profitable brands and should be
“milked” to provide as much cash as possible. The cash gained from “cows”
Industry Attractiveness
Grow – If the business unit is strong against a strong attractiveness, you grow the
business. This means, that you are ready to invest a higher percentage of your
resources in these businesses. These business units have high market attractiveness
and high business unit strength. They are most likely to be successful if backed up
with more resources. The quadrants marked in green are the places where you can
grow your business.
Hold – If the business unit strength or attractiveness is average, then you hold the
business as it is. It might be that the market is dropping in value, or that there is
much high competition which the business unit will be hard put to catch up. In
both the cases, the business unit might not give optimum returns even if resources
are invested. Thus, in this case, you wait and hold the business unit to see if the
market environment changes or if the business unit gains importance in the market
as compared to other players.
Harvest – If the business unit or market has become unattractive, than you either
sell or liquidate the business or you can hold it for any residual value that it has.
This strategy is used in the GE McKinsey matrix when the business unit strength is
weak and the market has lost its attractiveness. The best measure in this case is to
Like any other strategy, the GE McKinsey matrix has its own challenges. Some of them
are mentioned below.
Parenting Strategies
Parenting strategies refer to the manner in which the management coordinates activities
and transfers resources and cultivate capabilities among product lines and business units.
There are basically three styles of corporate parenting as follows;
generic strategies are the basic approaches to strategic planning that can be
adopted by any firm in
any market or industry to improve its competitive performance.
Product brand image and design firms that recognize changing trends and offer
advancements for current products are likely to differentiate the company from
their competition. An exclusive or exceptional design can draw customers and
help a company dominant their environment. For example Mercedes Benz has
created a perception that their automobile is unique and in a quality class of its
own.
Marketing- Having the right sales professionals on the team that are well trained,
knowledgeable, and enthusiastic and have a good work ethic can help give the
company an edge on its rivalry. Companies keep good sales people when they
show them appreciation and give recognition for superior performance.
Technology- A Company must develop an excellent reputation for cutting edge
research and development to lead in its industry. Though expensive, technology
will enable the organization to differentiate its self from its competitors and the
level of technology adopted can enable the firm improve its standards.
Customer service - Companies that hold their customers in high esteem and offer
quality service understands that without the customers’ business they will fold. It's
important to give great service consistently. The best gauge of excellent service is
repeat business and customers will spread the word. Bend over backwards to
make sure customers are satisfied.
iii. Formulation of operating plans: Operating plans refers to the action plans,
decisions and the programs, that take place regularly, in different parts of the
company. If they are framed to indicate the proposed strategic results, they assist
in attaining the objectives of the organization by concentrating on the factors
which are significant.
i. Creating budgets which provide sufficient resources to those activities which are
relevant to the strategic success of the business.
iv. Leading practices are to be employed for carrying out key business functions.
vi. Developing a favorable work climate and culture, for proper implementation of
the strategy.
While there are many change management models, most companies will choose at least
one of the following three models to operate under:
Below you can find the McKinsey model, which represents the connections between
seven areas and divides them into ‘Soft Ss’ and ‘Hard Ss’. The shape of the model
emphasizes interconnectedness of the elements.
The method chosen for implementation depends with the organization, nature of the
problem and urgency. The following ways can be used for implementing strategy;
i. Direct cutover. Also known as the plunge, abrupt cut-over, or the "big bang"
approach. In this method the old strategy is discarded and the new strategy is
adopted. This approach can be the least expensive of the different methods and
can occur in the quickest time. Users and management have a high interest in
making the new strategy work because, by design, there is no turning back. A
direct cutover conversion may be the only option if the old and new strategy
cannot co-exist in any form. The greatest risk is the impact that errors and failures
would have on the organization. The timing of this type of conversion is a key
element of its success.
ii. Pilot Operation. The pilot operation changeover method involves implementing
the complete new strategy at a selected department/section of the organization.
The group that uses the new strategy first is called the pilot site. The old strategy
continues to operate for the entire organization including the pilot site. After the
strategy proves successful at the pilot site, it is implemented in the rest of the
organization, usually using direct cutover method. Pilot operation is combination
of parallel operation and direct cutover methods. Pilot site assure the working of
new strategy and reduces the risk of strategy failure.
iii. Parallel Operation. In this method, the two strategies run simultaneously. The
parallel operation changeover method requires that both the old and the new
strategies operate fully for a specified period. When users and management are
satisfied that the new strategy operates correctly, the old strategy is terminate.
Parallel operation is having very low amount of risk as if the new strategy does
not work correctly, the company can use the old strategy as a backup. But it is the
most costly changeover method.
Structure is the sum total of the ways in which the organization divides its labor
into distinct tasks and then achieves coordination between them.
The structure breaks up the company’s work into well-defined jobs, assigns these
jobs to departments and people and coordinates these jobs by defining formal
lines of authority and communication.
Types of organizational structures
Organizational leadership
Leadership is the ability to influence the attitudes and opinions of others in
order to achieve a coordinated effort from a diverse group of employees.
Leadership answers the question of “How” of influence
Without a linkage between manager selection and strategy, an organization
risks either sacrificing a well-planned strategy to a manager who is ill suited
to implement it or hiring a key manager without a clear rationale for that
particular choice. The assumption is that the style of managers influences
their effectiveness in carrying out particular strategies. Certain
organizational cultures and strategies are better suited for certain styles of
leadership. Therefore the organization should be provided with
The Vision Barrier. Only 5% of the work force understands the strategy. The
“command and control” mechanisms of the industrial age, when employees were
merely “spokes in the wheel,” who required little knowledge of the company
vision are no longer effective in the age of the knowledge-based economy.
The People Barrier. Only 25% of managers have personal objectives and
incentives linked to strategy. Most incentive compensation systems are tied to
short-term financial results, rather than the long-term initiatives that support
strategy execution.
The Resource Barrier. 60% of organizations don't link budgets to strategy. This
occurrence is not uncommon, as in many companies the budgeting and strategic
planning functions don't interact! Amazing! And since budgets are the traditional
tools for planning the allocation of human and financial resources, strategic plans
and strategic initiatives may fall short in terms of necessary resources.
The Management Barrier. 85% of executive teams spend less than one hour per
moth discussing strategy. Have you ever conducted a monthly operations review
meeting with your staff? When you hold operations reviews, is the majority of
time dedicated to a discussion of financial results, focusing on "budget versus
actual" variances. Not uncommon. But, since budgets are often not linked to the
strategic plan, the discussions may completely avoid any focus on the true value
drivers in the business.
There are several types of evaluations that can be conducted. Some of them include the
following:
Rummelt (1996) has outlined four criteria that can be used to evaluating any
strategy. These are:
i. Consistency. Strategy must not present mutually inconsistent goals or goals are
consistent with the organization’s overall strategic direction.
The success of the evaluation process depends of the systems used and how they are
used. Effective strategy evaluation systems should have the following characteristics;
i. Economical; too much information is a bad as too little.
ii. Meaningful; Strategy-evaluation activities must be meaningful and relate directly
to the organization’s objectives
iii. Timely: Strategy-evaluation activities should provide timely information.
iv. Contextual: Strategy-evaluation activities should provide information that is
contextual and designed to show a true picture of what is happening.
v. Action-oriented: Information from strategy evaluation activities should be action-
oriented rather than information oriented and should be directed at those
individuals in the organization who are responsible for taking the relevant action
vi. Cooperation: The strategy evaluation process should facilitate cooperation
between departments during decision making to foster mutual understanding
rather than dominated activities.
The five basic organizational resources usually define the areas of control.
i. Physical resources: Control includes inventory management, quality control and
equipment control.
ii. Human resources: Control includes selection and placement, training and
development, performance appraisal and compensation.
iii. Information resources: Control includes sales/marketing forecasting,
environmental analysis, public relations, production scheduling and economic
forecasting.
iv. Technological resources. Control includes cost of technology usage, and effects of
technology usage.
Control process
The success of any organization is determined by its ability to achieve its fundamental
purpose and live its stated values effectively. Both of these are stipulated in the mission
statement. After the strategy is implemented, it is important to carry out an evaluation to
ascertain how well the strategy has been achieved. For successful strategy evaluation, the
following specific control procedures must apply.
i. Establishing standards. Standards are criteria against which results are measured.
They are norms to achieve the goals. Standards are usually measured in terms of
output. They can also be measured in non-monetary terms like loyalty, customer
attraction, goodwill etc. Some of the standards are as.
Time standards: The goal will be set on the basis of time lapse in
performing a task.
Cost standards: These indicate the financial expenditures involved per
unit, e.g. material cost per unit, cost per person, etc.
Income standards: These relate to financial rewards received due to a
particular activity like sales volume per month, year etc.
Market share: This relates to the share of the company's product in the
market.
Productivity: Productivity can be measured on the basis of units
produced per man hour etc.
Profitability: These goals will be set with the consideration of cost per
unit, market share, etc.
ii. Measuring actual performance. Most organizations prepare formal reports of
performance measurements that managers review regularly. These measurements
should be related to the standards set in the first step of the control process. For
example, if sales growth is a target, the organization should have a means of
Importance of control
i. Control improves Goodwill. Quality control improves the quality of the
products. Cost control decreases the cost of the products. Therefore, the
organisation can supply good quality products at lower prices. This increases the
goodwill of the organisation.
ii. Control minimizes Wastage. Control helps to reduce the wastage of human,
material and financial resources. This increases the profits of the organisation.
iii. Control ensures optimum utilization of resources. Control helps the organisation
to make optimum utilization of the available resources. This also increases the
profit of the organisation.
iv. Control helps to fix responsibility. Control helps to fix responsibility of a
particular job on a particular person or a particular department. So, if there are
any mistakes then a particular person or a particular department will be held
responsible for it.
v. Control guides operations. Control fixes certain standards. All the work has to be
done according to these standards. So control, acts like a traffic signal. It guides all
the operations of the organisation in the right direction.
vi. Control motivates employees. In control, the employees' performances are
evaluated regularly. Those who show good performances are rewarded by giving
them promotions, cash prizes, etc. This motivates the employees to work hard,
and it also improves their morale.
vii. Control minimizes deviations. Control minimizes the deviations between a
planned performance and actual performance.