Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Digest 1
Case Digest 1
Case Digest 1
Antioquia
HTM C407-302H
A Chinese Coast Guard ship outside the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, June 18,
2016. (Sergey Ponomarev/The New York Times)
What’s behind rising China-Philippines
tensions in the South China Sea?
A Chinese Coast Guard ship uses water cannon on a Philippine Coast Guard ship near the Philippine-
occupied Second Thomas Shoal in the South China Sea on August 5, 2023 [File: Philippine Coast
Guard via AP]
Parties Involved
Plaintiff: Philippines
Defendant: China
Other Party’s Involved:
Court
The Arbitral Tribunal Court
Legal Instruments
1. Philippine initiated the arbitration under Annex VII of
the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS or the Convention or the 1982 Convention)
1
Key Issues
Phillipines and China Tension in the South China
Sea
Ruling
Philippines launched arbitral proceedings against China on
January 22, 2013. China responded by rejecting the
arbitration in a diplomatic note sent to the Philippines on
February 19, 2013, in response. China claimed that the
Arbitral Tribunal lacked jurisdiction in the case because the
Philippines' proposed legal theory, the UN Convention on the
Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), was not fully accepted by China
and excluded issues like historic title determination and sea
boundary delimitation. Since that time, China has
consistently refused to recognise the arbitral processes that
the Philippines had started as well as to take part in them.
However, the tribunal did not view this as a barrier, and on
29 October 2015 it issued its first award establishing
jurisdiction, and on 12 July 2016 it issued its award
addressing the merits of the dispute.
Implications
The United States of America implicate the tension
by joining the Philippines against China for defense
and guard the South China Sea and the countries
conduct a joint training.
Conclusion
It came to the conclusion that China had violated the terms of UNCLOS,
specifically by (a) temporarily banning fishing in South China Sea areas
that were part of the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone, (b) failing to
stop Chinese vessels from fishing in the EEZ at Mischief Reef and
Second Thomas Shoal, and (c) preventing Filipino fishermen from
engaging in traditional fishing at Scarborough Shoal.
References:
https://apnews.com/article/philippines-dispute-south-china-sea-patrol-
27ee9778f7302938c5090644e3d153c2
https://globalnation.inquirer.net/210843/china-harasses-philippine-coast-
guard-vessel
https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/1/legal-victory-for-the-philippines-
against-china-a-case-study/
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/9/whats-behind-rising-china-
philippines-tensions-in-the-south-china-sea
https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/08/china-philippines-tensions-
risk-wider-conflict-could-draw-us