Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 54 views

    G.R. No. 211969 - 2022107203 PINEDA

    Uploaded by

    Derry
    The Linden Suites Inc. filed a complaint against Meridien Far East Properties Inc. after discovering the respondent's retaining wall encroached on its property line. The issue is whether the regional trial court that rendered judgment on the complaint can examine the respondent's officers. The Supreme Court ruled the regional trial court has supervisory control over execution of its judgment and its refusal to examine the officers was a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    G.R. No. 211969 - 2022107203 PINEDA

    Uploaded by

    Derry
    54 views1 page
    The Linden Suites Inc. filed a complaint against Meridien Far East Properties Inc. after discovering the respondent's retaining wall encroached on its property line. The issue is whether the regional trial court that rendered judgment on the complaint can examine the respondent's officers. The Supreme Court ruled the regional trial court has supervisory control over execution of its judgment and its refusal to examine the officers was a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    G.R. No. 211969_2022107203 PINEDA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Linden Suites Inc. filed a complaint against Meridien Far East Properties Inc. after discovering the respondent's retaining wall encroached on its property line. The issue is whether the regional trial court that rendered judgment on the complaint can examine the respondent's officers. The Supreme Court ruled the regional trial court has supervisory control over execution of its judgment and its refusal to examine the officers was a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    54 views1 page

    G.R. No. 211969 - 2022107203 PINEDA

    Uploaded by

    Derry
    The Linden Suites Inc. filed a complaint against Meridien Far East Properties Inc. after discovering the respondent's retaining wall encroached on its property line. The issue is whether the regional trial court that rendered judgment on the complaint can examine the respondent's officers. The Supreme Court ruled the regional trial court has supervisory control over execution of its judgment and its refusal to examine the officers was a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    The Linden Suites Inc.

    , Petitioner
    vs.
    Meridien Far East Properties Inc. Respondent
    G.R. No. 211969, October 4,2021
    Ponente: Hernando, J.

    Facts:
    The herein petitioner filed a complaint for damages against the respondent after discovering that
    the concrete retaining wall of the adjacent building, One Magnificent Mile, owned by
    respondent, had encroached on its property line. Linden Suites Inc. filed an urgent motion to
    examine judgment obligor.

    Issue:
    May the RTC, as the court that rendered judgment on petitioner’s complaint, examine
    respondent’s officers?

    Held:
    The petition is impressed with merit. The RTC’s error in judgment is tantamount to grave abuse
    of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. It is settled that the court which
    rendered the judgment has the supervisory control over the execution of its judgment.

    You might also like