Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) - Emergency Care Institute
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) - Emergency Care Institute
The NSW Government is in a caretaker period in the lead up to the 2023 state election. Until the caretaker period
ends, limited updates will be made to this website.
AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia affecting approximately 1-2% of the population. It is
associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and preventable stroke. With the
increasing age of the population, AF is becoming more prevalent in the community.
There is no strong evidence to favour either a rate control or rhythm control strategy. This is partly because
there is a reasonably high spontaneous reversion rate – around one third in the first 6 hours, and the
adverse event rate is very low making it hard to differentiate any strategy on the basis of safety.
In otherwise healthy patients with acute AF, a strategy to return them to sinus rhythm as soon as possible
seems reasonable. In patients with an unknown duration of AF, or significant cardiac or other illness
disease, emphasis should be on rate control.
Classification
1. First detected episode
2. Recurrent
Permanent
AF Immediate Management ()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 1/8
23/03/2023, 13:55 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Emergency Care Institute
Initial Assessment
An assessment of haemodynamic instability should be made first. Parameters suggesting instability include:
Decreased LOC
Chest pain
Shortness of breath (due to heart failure)
Systolic of less than 90mmHg (or 30-40mm less than the patient’s usual SBP)
Diaphoresis
Patients assessed as unstable require immediate cardioversion to prevent further deterioration to cardiac
arrest. This is uncommon in the setting of uncomplicated AF. The need for urgent cardioversion should also
be anticipated in patients where decompensation is thought likely. The parameters above are a guide only.
For example a patient who appears well and has atypical chest pain and has no shortness of breath will not
get cardioverted, whereas a patient who is diaphoretic, appears unwell and has a systolic of 80 should get
cardioverted urgently.
In stable patients, evaluation involves history, examination and ECG. Blood tests including renal function,
full blood count and magnesium levels are routine. Hepatic and thyroid function should also be considered.
Coagulation studies should be sent in patients where anticoagulation is likely to be commenced, or in
patients already on warfarin. Transthoracic echo is ideal, if available.
Initial Management
Objectives in the management of AF are:
Identify and treat associated or causative factors which may abort the arrhythmia
fluid resuscitation in dry patients
temperature control and antibiotics where there is an infection
electrolyte deficiencies, particulalry magnesium and potassium
Decide on rate control or rhythm control
Prevent thromboembolism (balancing the risk of stroke against risk of bleeding from anticoagulation)
- CHADS2, HASBLED.
Alcohol
Caffeine
Surgery
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
Phaeochromocytoma
Pericarditis
Myocarditis
Pulmonary embolism
Atrial ischaemia
Amyloidosis
Age-induced atrial fibrotic changes
Haemochromatosis
Endomyocardial fibrosis
Primary or metastatic disease in or adjacent to the atrial wall
Electrophysiological abnormalities
Obesity
Sleep apnoea
Neurogenic
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Major ischaemic stroke
While rate versus rhythm contol is a key issue in the management of AF, the AFFIRM study
(http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021328)showed no statistically significant difference in mortality or in
quality of life with either management. Most patients require control of heart rate for symptomatic relief and ()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 3/8
23/03/2023, 13:55 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Emergency Care Institute
Rhythm control
In an otherwise healthy person (stable) with AF for less than 48hrs, chemical cardioversion is appropriate.
Cardioversion (electrical or chemical) to achieve rhythm control is not recommended where onset of AF is
thought to be more than 48 hours earlier (unless unstable). There is no clear evidence for this time, however
it is widely accepted and stated in guidelines.
The most potent rhythm control agent is DC cardioversion, with success rates well above 90% in published
trials. These also demonstrate
positioning of the pads matters: anterior and posterior is better than anterior and lateral
bi-phasic waveform is better than mono-phasic
the optimum initial energy for bi-phasic is 100 Joules.
Pharmacological cardioversion effectively restores sinus rhythm in approximately 50% of patients with
recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
For a patient with atrial fibrillation who has normal left ventricular function and no coronary disease,
flecainide is preferred by cardiologists. In the ED we will rarely know a patent has normal ventricular
function and coronary arteries. For this reason Amiodarone is the preferred ED option for chemical
cardioversion.
Rate control
Patients with duration of AF of over 48hrs and/or patients with chronic cardiac complaints as per CHADS2
(http://www.ecinsw.com.au/CHADS2) should have rate control and anticoagulation started.
Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and beta blockers are both effective agents to reduce the ventricular
rate. Neither increases the likelihood of conversion to sinus rhythm. The most studied intravenous
calcium channel blocker – Diltiazem – is not available in Australia and with limited data on verapamil,
beta blockers are probably the better option for rapid IV rate control. There is little evidence favouring
one agent over another – take your pick. However, there is rarely a real urgency to control rate, so
oral therapy with either diltiazem or a beta blocker is a reasonable approach. Often this will depend
on local cardiologist preference.
Digoxin does have rate control properties, but is slower to work than calcium channel blockers and
beta blockers. However it does not have the negative inotropy of the other agents so is a reasonable
and safe choice in patients with poor LV function or who are compromised for other reasons such as
sepsis. It has no rhythm control properties.
Anti-arrhythmic drugs only have a 40-60% success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm at 1 year and have
significant side effects. Older patients >65 years with recurrent persistent AF at high risk of stroke (CHADS2
score of 1 or more) have similar out comes (stroke or mortality) with either rate or rhythm control and a trend
towards fewer hospitalisations for those rate controlled. Rate control is more suitable for older patients with
persistent or permanent AF whereas young patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF may require
rhythm control.
AF Medications
Back to the top
Rate control
Beta-blockers
Metoprolol 25-100mg bd PO
()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 4/8
23/03/2023, 13:55 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Emergency Care Institute
Metoprolol 5mg IV (1-2mg per minute) repeated at 5-minute intervals if necessary, up to a total 15mg
(usually total doses of around 5mg are required)
Atenolol 25-100mg daily PO (IV not available)
Beta blockers and Calcium channel blockers control both exertional and resting heart rate
Digoxin
Digoxin loading: Digoxin 250-500mcg IV or oral initial dose, then followed by further doses of 125-
250mcg q6-8h to a maximum of 1mg or until control achieved (inpatient regime only).
Maintenance therapy: digoxin 62.5-250mcg PO in patients who are elderly, sedentary or those with
heart failure. Adjust dose accordingly to renal function (eGFR) and age.
Rhythm control
The decision to attempt cardioversion and maintain sinus rhythm depends on the long term frequency and
hazards of AF and risks of cardioversion and therapy. Cardioversion can be attempted using anti-arrhythmic
medication or by electrical cardioversion.
Stroke may occur at the time of cardioversion because of the expulsion of an atrial thrombus and up to 4-6
weeks after because of atrial stunning. It is generally regarded as safe if it is certain the episode has lasted
less than 48 hours (limited hard evidence). The options are to anticoagulate for at least 3 weeks prior and 4-
6 weeks post, or a pre-procedure TOE to exclude the presence of LA/LAA thrombus.
Amiodarone
150-300mg IV infusion over 20 minutes - 2 hours
Or 200-400mg po tds for 1 week, then taper dose
Flecanide
2mg/kg up to 150mg IV infusion over 30 minutes
Or 50-100mg po 2-3 times/day
Can be used as a ‘pill in the pocket’ for infrequent highly symptomatic AF
Possibility of accelerating ventricular rate so consider pre-treatment with AV nodal blocking
drug e.g. Digoxin, beta blocker, verapamil, diltiazem
Fleicanide is contraindicated in structural heart disease
Prevention of thromboembolism
AF predisposes to the formation of blood clots within the left atrium and left atrial appendage which may
embolise to the systemic circulation. Consequently AF is an independent risk factor for cardio-embolic
ischaemic stroke. These strokes are typically large and associated with high early mortality. Optimal
thromboprophylaxis is important but requires individual assessment.
Use of antithrombotic prophylaxis depends on the patient’s long term risk of ischaemic stroke (estimated by
the CHADS2 score (http://www.ecinsw.com.au/CHADS2)) and the benefits and risks of long term anticoagulation
including major bleeding (this can be estimated using tools such as HASBLED)
()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 5/8
23/03/2023, 13:55 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Emergency Care Institute
Oral anticoagulation is recommended for people at moderate to high risk of stroke (CHADS2 score ≥1)
unless contraindicated or annual major bleeding risk >3%. Aspirin is recommended in patients
with CHADS2 score of 0, or if anticoagulation contraindicated. Stroke risk should be re-assessed yearly.
Anticoagulation medication includes warfarin and the novel oral anti-cogulants (NOACs Dabigatran,
Rivaroxaban and Apixaban). The National Prescribing Service only recommends NOACs as suitable for
stroke prevention in non-valvular AF. Valvular AF carries a much higher risk of stroke and there is insufficient
evidence of NOAC efficacy in this group of patients. NOACs are contraindicated in people with severe renal
failure.
Catheter ablation
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an increasingly used therapeutic strategy for the management of AF. The
procedure involves application of radiofrequency energy to electrically isolate the pulmonary veins, and/or
to ablate identified trigger areas, in an attempt to cure the patient of AF.
The National Heart Foundation of Australia produced a consensus statement in January 2013
(https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/1/national-heart-foundation-australia-consensus-statement-catheter-ablation-
therapy). It recommends the primary indication being the presence of symptomatic AF that is refractory or
intolerant of class 1 or class 3 antiarrhythmic medications. Best results have been seen in younger patients
with paroxysmal AF, no structural heart disease and smaller atria. Patients with persistent AF
or CHADS2 score ≥ 2 require anticoagulation for at least 3 weeks prior to RFA as well as a transoeophageal
echo to eclude atrial thrombus. Anticoagulation is continued for at least 1-3 months post procedure but not
recommended to be ceased in patients with a CHADS2 score ≥ 2.
CHADS2
Back to the top
This is a tool to stratify the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF to assist in the need for treatment
with anti-coagulation.
Hypertension 1 point
Diabetes 1 point
Oral anticoagulation is recommended for people with moderate to high risk of stroke unless
contraindicated.
The CHA2DS2VASc score, introduced by the European Society of Cardiology provides a more
comprehensive stroke risk assessment extending the score with points allotted for female sex, vascular
disease and age 65-74yrs. Click here for online calculator. (http://clincalc.com/cardiology/stroke/chadsvasc.aspx)
()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 6/8
23/03/2023, 13:55 Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Emergency Care Institute
HASBLED
Back to the top
HASBLED SCORE
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to
assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010
Nov; 138(5):1093-100. Epub 2010 Mar 18. PubMed PMID: 20299623.
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20299623)
Hypertension 1 point
Stroke 1 point
Using this tool you can identify correctable risk factors for bleeding and people who need increased clinical
monitoring. >3 equates to high risk.
()
https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci/clinical/clinical-tools/cardiology/atrial-fibrillation 8/8