Thesis Paper Ramirez Macali David Tan Sembrano

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 88

READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES AND WRITING

STRATEGIES TO THE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY


OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
STUDENTS OF CAVITE NATIONAL
HIGH SCHOOL-SENIOR
HIGH SCHOOL

UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY


Cavite City Campus
Cavite City

Department of Teacher Education and Languages

VEN ALLEN A. DAVID


QUEENY VENISH MACALI
JANICA MAE F. RAMIREZ
WELLA YVONNE SEMBRANO
RAYN WAUKEE TAN
June 2022
READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES AND WRITING STRATEGIES
TO THE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL
SCIENCES STUDENTS OF CAVITE NATIONAL HIGH
SCHOOL-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
2

Undergraduate Thesis
Submitted to the Faculty of the
Department of Teacher Education and Languages
Cavite State University
Cavite City Campus

In partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the subject
BSEE31: Language and Education Research

VEN ALLEN A. DAVID


QUEENY VENISH MACALI
JANICA MAE F. RAMIREZ
WELLA YVONNE SEMBRANO
RAYN WAUKEE TAN
June 2022

Republic of the Philippines


CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY
Cavite City Campus
Barangay 8, Pulo II, Dalahican, Cavite City
3

DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER EDUCATION AND LANGUAGES


Teacher Education Program

Authors: VEN ALLEN A. DAVID


QUEENY VENISH MACALI
JANICA MAE F. RAMIREZ
WELLA YVONNE SEMBRANO
RAYN WAUKEE TAN

Title: READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES AND WRITING


STRATEGIES TO THE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
STUDENTS OF CAVITE NATIONAL
HIGH SCHOOL-SENIOR
HIGH SCHOOL

A P P R O V E D:

JEREMIAH L. JANGAD
ERLINDA CAERLANG
Adviser Technical Critic
Date: _____________ Date: _____________

MARIA CRISTINA J. BAESA, MA Ed GELUCILE BACONES


Department Chair Campus Coordinator, RDE
Date: _____________ Date: _____________

MARIA CRISTINA J. BAESA, MA Ed


Campus Administrator
Date: _____________
4

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Mr. Ven Allen A. David was born on December 27, 2000 in Cavite City and

the eldest child of Mrs. Roseby A. David and Mr. Ricky T. David. He resides in San

Antonio. Cavite City together with his family.

He completed elementary at Julian Felipe Elementary School (JFES), San

Antonio, Cavite City in 2013 and junior high school in one of the oldest schools in the

Philippines, Cavite National High School (CNHS), Caridad, Cavite City in 2017. In the

same school, he graduated senior high school in 2019 with honors. His

achievements include award in Spoken Poetry which talks about love, teachers, and

family. He has once become a student leader and a treasurer of the Humanities and

Social Sciences (HUMSS) organization, Humanitarian Association of Notable and

Devout Students (HANDS). He was also an active member of Glee Club, a choir

group of senior high school students.

The author is currently enrolled at Cavite State University-Cavite City Campus

with the degree of Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English. He was a

consistent Dean's lister from first year to second year and President's lister in his

third year. Furthermore, he was an active student-leader who served as Public

Information Officer of Societas Educare, the organization of Education students. He

also served Vice President – Internal of Gender Issues Busters, president of Central

Student Government (CSG), and chairman of Federation of the Central Student

Government-Committee on Student Organizations and External Affairs (CSOEXA).

With these achievements, the author then, hopes to obtain his degree in June 2023.

iv
5

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Ms. Queeny Venish Macali was born on July 31, 2001 in Cavite City and the

only child of Mrs. Melissa P. Macali and Mr. Ronald A. Lubo. She lives in Pasinaya

Northeast, Naic, Cavite together with her family.

She completed grade school at Ovidio S. Dela Rosa Elementary School

(ORES), Cavite City in 2013. She was a consistent honor student from Kindergarten

to Grade 6. She ended up First Honorable Mention with special awards in Reading

and Writing. Also, she completed junior high school at Cavite National High School in

2016graduated in the same institution in 2019. She was still a consistent honor

student since her 7th grade, up until her graduation in senior high school with

honorary award.

The author is currently in her third year at Cavite State University – Cavite

City Campus (CvSU taking up the degree of Bachelor in Secondary Education Major

in English. She was a consistent Dean’s Lister, who has the goal to graduate with

honors.

v
6

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Ms. Janica Mae F. Ramirez, born on August 21, 2001 in Cavite City and the

eldest daughter of Jay Ramirez and Maria Luz Ramirez. She resides at Sangley

Point, Cavite City.

She studied elementary at Sangley Elementary School, Cavite City and

completed it in 2013 with academic distinction. He enrolled junior high school at

Sangley Point National High School, Sangley Point Naval Airbase, Cavite City and

completed it in 2016. For senior high school, she enrolled at Cavite National High

School, Caridad, Cavite City under the strand, Humanities and Social Sciences and

graduated in2019. In the commencement exercises, she received an academic

distinction and honorary award.

The author enrolled her college education at Cavite State University-Cavite

City Campus taking the degree of Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English.

For the past 3 years, she was able to earn the Dean’s list and she is still on that

pursuit. For her extracurricular activities, she is secretary of the Central Student

Government (CSG), the mother student organization in the university this academic

year 2020-2021.

She hopes to obtain her degree in June 2023.


7

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Ms. Wella Yvonne L. Sembrano, lives in Purok 4, Lapinig, Kapatagan,

Lanao del Norte. She was born on September 27, 2000 in Lanao del Norte and the

eldest daughter of Mrs. Johanna Sembrano Lingolingo and Mr. Richard B.

Lingolingo.

She completed elementary at Sixto Maghanoy Sr. Central School,

Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte in 2013 and junior high school at Placida Mequiabas

National High School in 2016. In senior high school, she spent a month in Christ

the King College de Maranding, Lala, Lanao del Norte. However, after a month, she

went back to Placida Mequiabas National High School and graduated there in 2019.

The author enrolled her college at Cavite State University-Cavite City Campus

taking the degree of Bachelor of Secondary Education major in English. She was a

student-athlete during her freshmen year.

The author hopes to obtain her degree in June 2023.

vi
8

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA

Ms. Rayn Waukee M. Tan was born on June 24, 2021 and she lives in

Dalahican, Cavite City. She is eldest among the three children of Mrs. Maricel M. Tan

and Mr. Raphael R. Tan.

She completed elementary at Ladislao Diwa Elementary School (LDES),

Caridad, Cavite City in 2013 with honors and junior high school at Cavite National

High School in 2017. She continued senior high school at the same institution where

she graduated in 2019. With regards to extracurricular activities, author and her

group won in dance contests representing her alma mater.

The author continued her college education at Cavite State University- Cavite

City Campus with the degree of Bachelor of Secondary Education major in English.

Her achievements include a President’s list and Dean’s list. She hopes then that she

would earn her degree in June 2023.

vii
9

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

There searchers would like to express their deepest gratitude to the following

persons for their great contributions that made this study possible:

Mr. Jeremiah Jangad, their research adviser, for his guidance and shared

knowledge;

Ms. Erlinda Caerlang, their research instructor, for her unending support and

presence throughout the process of the study;

Ms. Dianne Agana, psychometrician, for validating the research instrument;

Mr. Lambert Diokno, statistician, for imparting his expertise, specifically in

data analysis and statistical treatment of data;

Prof. Maria Cristina J. Baesa, campus administrator, who is always supportive

with the student researchers;

Researchers’ families, for providing endless care, love, moral support and

financial assistance;

Friends, who served as greatest emotional support during the researchers’ lowest

times.

Above all, Almighty God, for granting wisdom and strength for the sake of the

furtherance of this study.

THE AUTHORS

viii
10

ABSTRACT

DAVID, VEN ALLEN A., MACALI, QUEENY VENISH., RAMIREZ, JANICA MAE F.,
SEMBRANO, WELLA YVONNE., TAN, RAYN WAUKEE. Reading
Comprehension Strategies and Writing Strategies to the English Proficiency of
Humanities and Social Sciences Students of Cavite National High School-
Senior High School. Undergraduate Thesis. Bachelor of Science in Secondary
Education Major in English. Cavite State University-Cavite City Campus. June 2022.
Adviser: Mr. Jeremiah L. Jangad.

Numerous studies have examined the reading and writing strategies

employed by students and the effect of strategy instruction on skill development.

However, no study has ever investigated whether there is a correlation between the

frequency of use of reading and writing strategies and English proficiency.

The primary objective of this study is to determine if there is a significant

relationship between reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies and

the English proficiency of Humanities and Social Sciences students at Cavite

National High School-Senior High School. The researchers implemented the

following reading comprehension and writing strategies to improve (a student's)

English proficiency based on the findings of the study. This study has a sample of 40

participants, with voluntary response sampling for the sampling technique. With the

use of reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies checklist together

with the standardized English proficiency test, the researchers were able to conclude

that there is no significant correlation between reading comprehension strategies and

writing strategies and the English proficiency of Humanities and Social Sciences

students of Cavite National High School-Senior High School.

ix
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA …………………………………………………………. iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………………………………………………… ix

ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………. x

LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………... xiii

LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………. xv

LIST OF APPENDICES…………………………………………………………. xvi

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. 17

Statement of the Problem ………………………………………………… 19

Objectives of the Study …………….……………………………………. 20

Hypothesis………………………………………………………………… 20

Significance of the Study ………………………………………….......... 20

Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………….. 21

Conceptual Framework …………………………………………….......... 22

Time and Place of the Study …………………...................................... 23

Scope and Limitation of the Study…………………………………….... 23

Definition of Terms …...………………………………………................ 23

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE………………………………………... 25

METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………. 33

J Research Design……………………………………...…………………... 33

Sources of Data…………………………………………………………….. 33

Research Instrument ……………………………………………………. 34

Data Gathering Procedure...……………………………………………... 34

Data Analysis……………….... 35

x
12

…………………………………………….

Statistical Treatment of 35

Data……………………………………………...

RESULTS AND 37
DISCUSSION……………………………………………………

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS……….………. 60

Summary…………………………………….……………………………... 60

Conclusion…………………………………….…………………………… 61

Recommendations…………………………………….............................. 62

REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………. 63

APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………... 64
13

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1 Cronbach’s alpha scale…………………………………………... 37

2 Reading comprehension strategies reliability statistics…….. 38

3 Prior to reading reliability statistics……………………………. 38

4 During reading reliability statistics……………………………. 39

5 After reading reliability statistics………………………………. 39

6 Writing strategies reliability statistics………………………….. 40

7 Prior to writing reliability statistics…………………………….. 40

8 During writing reliability statistics……………………………… 40

9 After writing reliability statistics…………………………………. 41

10 Distribution of participants by section…………………………. 41

11 Distribution of participants according to sex…………………… 42

12 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies


prior to reading…………………………….……………… 43

13 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies


during reading…………………………….………………… 45

14 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies after reading 48

15 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies prior to writing 50

16 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies during writing 52

17 Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies after writing 53

18 Grammar (Part 1) Percentage of HUMSS students of


CNHS-SHS…………………………….…………… 54

19 Grammar (Part 2) Percentage of HUMSS


students of CNHS-SHS…………………………….……… 55

20 Vocabulary Percentage of HUMSS Students of CNHS-SHS…… 56

xiii
21 Reading comprehension percentage of the HUMSS
14

students of CNHS-SHS…………………………….………… 57

22 The relationship between reading comprehension strategies


and English proficiency……………….………………… 58

23 The relationship between writing strategies and


English proficiency……………….…………………………… 59
15

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page
1 Conceptual framework of the study on reading comprehension
Strategies and writing strategies to the English proficiency of
Humanities and Social Sciences Students of Cavite
National High School-Senior High School…………………………. 22
.
2 Results of PISA 2018……………….………………………………… 26

xv
16

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Page
1 Research Instrument ………………….…………………………. 62

2 Letter of Request ………………………………………………. 67

3 Timetable of activities………………….………………………… 70

4 Routing Slip………………….…………………………………… 71

5 RD Forms…………………………………………………………. 78

6 English Critic Certification………………………………………. 87


17

READING COMPREHENSION STRATEGIES AND WRITING STRATEGIES TO


THE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL
SCIENCES STUDENTS OF CAVITE NATIONAL HIGH
SCHOOL-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Ven Allen A. David


Queeny Venish Macali
Janica Mae F. Ramirez
Wella Yvonne Sembrano
Rayn Waukee Tan

An undergraduate thesis manuscript submitted to the faculty of Department of


Teacher Education and Languages, Cavite State University–Cavite City Campus.
In partial fulfillment of the subject requirements of the subject, BSEE31: Language
and Education Research with Contribution No. ___________. Prepared under the
supervision of Mr. Jeremiah L. Jangad.

INTRODUCTION

English has long been established as the world’s first language or lingua

franca. Its prominence remains the same, especially in the 21st century when it has

been the primary language for academic writings, communication, business, and

politics. Having said this, the demands for English competency continue to increase,

as employers require such, making it their top priority when it comes to their hiring

preferences. Having the sensibility about the growing relevance of acquiring the

mastery of the English language and its marketability, more people invest in its

training and education.

Persons with high level of English proficiency are more likely to be globally

competitive, it is like a ticket to the world. However, the process of acquiring English

proficiency is not an easy road. One must enroll in proper training and education, not

to mention, the difficulty a person would inevitably experience with the course of

learning, the anxiety, the stress, the pressure, and so on.


xvi
18

The Philippines is recognized globally as one of the largest English-speaking

nations with the majority of its population having at least some degree of fluency in

the language (Cabigon, 2015). English has always been one of the official languages

of the Philippines and is spoken by more than 14 million Filipinos (Cabigon, 2015).

However, despite this title, stakeholders agree that the country needs to step up its

efforts in improving the teaching and learning of English, developing it as a vital skill

of the workforce (Cabigon, 2015). This leads to the issue of the poor reading

comprehension of Filipino students. In a study conducted by Program for

International Student Assessment (PISA), it is perceived that the Philippines shared a

significant rate of low performers among all PISA-participating countries and

economies. They added that 80 percent of the Filipino students did not reach the

minimum level of proficiency in reading. Their poor scores in English, Mathematics,

and Science are attributed to the students’ lack of ability in basic reading and

comprehension (Tomas, M.J., et al., 2021). Clearly, this problem taints the Filipinos’

reputation of being English language proficient individuals.

Reading comprehension and writing skills are both necessary for academic

achievement. It is a requirement for practically all graduate programs; however, most

students suffer from deficiencies in reading. This issue is most likely concerned with

student’s motivation and point of interest. When a student lacks interest in reading,

they are more susceptible to have bad remarks in assessments or examinations.

Students cut themselves off from the point of comprehension since they lack the

interest and motivation. This kind of attitude will most likely lead to poor sentence

construction, meaning it affects the student’s writing skills. This study aims to

construct reading comprehension strategies to improve English writing skills of the

HUMSS students of Cavite National High School.

Reading comprehension is the ability to objectively interpret written words and

draw conclusions about their meaning by integrating contemporary and past


19

information. Understanding the meaning of the text is far more important than simply

being able to precisely read printed words.

Students' inability to effectively connect with the material is frequently the

leading cause of reading comprehension difficulties. Decoding the words and

drawing inferences are two ways that may prove difficult for them. Consequently,

students struggle to comprehend what they are reading.

As mentioned above, 80 percent of the Filipino students did not reach the

lowest level of proficiency in reading. Their poor scores in some of the school

subjects are credited to the students’ need for capacity in essential reading and

comprehension. (Tomas, M.J., et al., 2021)

One article from Philippine Star (2010) states: “The undeniable fact remains

that the majority of Filipino students do not possess the ability and motivation to read.

Due to the fast-evolving world and changing technology, it cannot be denied that

sometimes reading is taken for granted.” That being said, there should be a solution

to fix this problem with regard to the poor reading comprehension of Filipino students.

Statement of the Problem

This study focused on reading comprehension strategies and writing

strategies to the English proficiency of Humanities and Social Science students of

Cavite National High School - Senior High School. Specifically, it sought answers to

the following questions:

1. What are the reading comprehension strategies of HUMSS students prior,

during, and after reading?

2. What are the writing strategies of HUMSS students prior, during, and after

writing?

3. What is level of English proficiency of HUMSS students?

4. Is there a significant relationship between reading comprehension and

writing strategy in English proficiency of the HUMSS students?


20

Objectives of the Study

This study primarily aimed to find out if there is a significant relationship

between reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to the English

proficiency of Humanities and Social Sciences students of Cavite National High

School-Senior High School.

Specifically, this study aimed to:

1. determine the reading comprehension strategies of the participants prior,

during, and after reading;

2. determine the writing strategies of the participants prior, during, and after

writing;

3. identify the English proficiency level of the participants;

4. know the significant relationship between reading comprehension strategies

and English proficiency of the participants; and

5. recognize the significant relationship between writing strategies and English

proficiency of the participants.

Hypothesis

Ho. No significant relationships between reading comprehension strategies

and writing strategies to the English proficiency of the HUMSS students at CNHS-

SHS.

Based on the assumption that there is a significant relationship between the

reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to the English proficiency of

the HUMSS students, the researchers would implement use of reading

comprehension strategies and writing strategies to improve (a student’s) English

proficiency.

Significance of the Study

This study was conducted to determine reading comprehension strategies

and writing strategies to improve the English proficiency of Grade 12 Humanities and
21

Social Sciences students at Cavite National High School – Senior High School. The

results of this study would benefit the following:

Learners. Results of this research could guide the learners to adapt and use

different reading comprehension and writing strategies to improve their English

proficiency skills.

Teachers. Some reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies

were discussed in the related literature. Teachers may them based on the learners’

learning styles; thus, would improve learners’ English proficiency skills in class.

Schools. This study may help the schools to know more about the different

reading comprehension and writing strategies that will improve learners’ English

proficiency skills that they may adapt in modifying school curriculum.

Future Researchers. This study would serve as a reference or guide to

future researchers as another study is conducted that is related to this topic.

Theoretical Framework

English being the world’s lingua franca, came the demands for English

proficient individuals; hence, it became a skill that requires mastery and competency.

The 21st century workplace demands English proficient individuals, being able to

speak English alone is not enough, especially in this 21 st century. This means that, if

a person is able to speak the English language, it does not automatically label them

as English proficient individual. With this information, the researchers of this study

had the initiative to conduct this research, which involves the improvement of

HUMSS students’ English proficiency with the reading comprehension strategies and

writing strategies.

This study puts heavy emphasis on the importance of acquiring English

proficiency. The researchers focused on senior high school students and chose

participants under a strand that will mostly require such skill (English proficiency)–

being Humanities and Social Sciences strand. The Humanities and Social Sciences

strand leads to fields of professions specifically as follows: education, law,


22

journalism, etc. With that, students under this strand are required to speak the

English language fluently which is a part of their training. Clearly, their future

professions demand such skill (English proficiency), most especially if they mean to

extend their careers overseas, which leads to the demand for English competency,

and in order to achieve such competency, one must employ several strategies. As

mentioned in the previous text, this study used reading comprehension strategies

and writing strategies. The following strategies are derived from a study entitled,

Investigation of Reading and Writing Strategies Used by Future Teachers: Do Good

Readers Write Well, by Ersoy Topuzkanamış (n.d.). The reading comprehension

strategies and writing strategies involved in this study are journaling, varied

instruction, and Socratic circles, which were measured by the authors discussed in

the data gathering procedure.

With this weight of information, it leads to the focal point of this study–to help

the Humanities and Social Sciences students of Cavite National High School-Senior

High School to improve their proficiency in the English language, but not without the

aid of the following reading comprehension and writing strategies in this study.

Conceptual Framework

Reading Writing Strategies (i.e.


Comprehension Journaling, Varied
Strategies (i.e. Instruction, and
Journaling, Varied Socratic Circles)
Instruction, and
Socratic Circles)

English Proficiency of
HUMSS Students
of CNHS-SHS
23

Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the study on reading comprehension strategies


and
writing strategies to the English proficiency of Humanities and Social
Sciences students of Cavite National High School-Senior High School

Reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies are the independent

variables (to the English Proficiency of HUMSS Students of CNHS-SHS). They are

separated into two since both are different factors that are highly critical to an

individual’s English proficiency which is the dependent variable. As mentioned earlier

in the text, the English proficiency of HUMSS students are dependent to the given

reading comprehension and writing strategy found in this study. These two factors

are both important to the development of a student’s English proficiency. The goal of

the study is to find out if there is a significant relationship between the given reading

comprehension and writing strategy to the English proficiency of HUMSS students at

Cavite National High School-Senior High School students.

Time and Place of the Study

This study was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 at Cavite

National High School-Senior High School, Cavite City.

Scope and Limitation of the Study

This study focused on reading comprehension and writing skills of Grade 12

Humanities and Social Sciences students at Cavite National High School - Senior

High School. Also, their English proficiency was determined through their answers in

the survey questionnaire.

Definition of Terms.

The following terms are defined according to how they were used in this study:

English Proficiency is the ability of students to use the English language to

make and communicate meaning in spoken and written contexts.

Reading is the process of taking in the sense or meaning of letters, symbols,

and the like.


24

Reading Comprehension is the ability to process text, understand its

meaning, and to integrate it with what the reader already knows.

Strategy is a general plan to achieve one or more long-term or overall goals

under conditions of uncertainty.

Writing Skills are the abilities used to clearly communicate ideas through

writing in various forms.


25

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

This chapter discusses the review of literature related to this study. It also

presents various findings and ideas taken from different existing legitimate sources of

knowledge.

Reading Comprehension

Reading takes both physical and mental efforts. To recognize words and

sentences, the reader's eyes must first navigate through lines of text in a coordinated

and sequential manner. Linking the word comprehension to the word reading easily

changes the definition the whole concept of the word. Reading comprehension is

defined as the ability to process written texts. It is the ability of a person to

understand and interpret what is read.

Efficiency in Reading Comprehension in Academics

Efficiency in reading comprehension leads a person to function more

effectively, especially in academics. As mentioned by Auld (2015) in a study about

student’s reading comprehension, “students who read independently have greater

reading comprehension, verbal fluency and general knowledge than those who do

not. They become better readers, score higher on achievement tests in all subject

areas, and have greater content knowledge than their non-reading peers.” This

statement clearly suggests that efficiency in reading comprehension results to better

academic performance.

A study about the impact of pleasure reading on academic success

concluded that (Whitten, C., et. al. 2016), “educators in the core subjects agreed that

pleasure reading was beneficial, even essential, to student development and

achievement.” The study examined the reading habits of 65 high school juniors at a

rural Southeast Texas high school, ranging in age from fifteen to seventeen years.

Students who read self-selected books for pleasure were thought to have higher

average grades in English, Mathematics, Science, and History than their non-reading
26

colleagues. The authors determined that students who read for enjoyment scored

higher on average in the subject areas studied than their non-reading peers. The

researchers went on to say that educators were aware of the link between pleasure

reading and academic performance, but that state curriculums and compulsory

examinations hampered their ability to do so.

Reading encourages students to think critically and enhances their reading

comprehension skills, which is important in all subject areas. Meanwhile, the

advantages of pleasure reading do not end in the classroom. Students carry their

reading skills into adulthood and, as a result, into the workforce and society.

Reading Comprehension in the Philippines

Figure 2: Results of students’ performance in reading, mathematics,


and science (PISA 2018)
27

Low Reading Comprehension of the Filipino Youth

The release of the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment

(PISA) Report in December 2019 revealed that high school students in the

Philippines scored lower in reading comprehension, mathematics, and science than

the majority of those surveyed in other countries. In fact, the national average

reading score was a meager 340 points. First-place China was awarded 555 points.

Based on the findings, more than 80 percent of fifteen-year-old Filipino students did

not meet the minimum proficiency level in reading.

Perez comments on the current state of literacy and reading comprehension

in the United States, stating, "I believe that we are in a dire situation." "Our NCAT

and NEAT results demonstrate that [our students] actually receive low scores on

standardized tests. Our students are not receiving adequate instruction in literacy

and mathematics."

This indicates the poor reading comprehension of Filipino students. The result

of the country’s overall score in reading is quite alarming. It is now a problem for the

Department of Education. It creates a huge impact on the future of the Filipino

students and also the welfare of the country’s future.

Reading Comprehension Strategies and English Writing Strategies

Reading comprehension strategies may be defined as "a complex process

involving interactions between the reader and the text, using multiple skills" (Medina,

2007, p. 4), because among the variety of known strategies, "some strategies work

for some students, and other strategies work for other students, just as some

strategies work best with certain types of reading material, other strategies work best

with other types of reading material" (Medina, 2007, p. 6). Teachers must take into

account a variety of factors when devising a strategy to help students improve their

reading comprehension, including the students' ability level, group dynamics, age

and gender demographics, and cultural context.


28

Reading and writing are interconnected. It states that written composition is a

multifaceted phenomenon, each dimension requiring a particular set of language and

cognitive abilities (Kim, Y.-S. G., & Graham, S., 2022). Higher-order cognitive abilities

such as inference, perspective taking, and monitoring, as well as reading

comprehension, all contribute to the written composition's quality. In comparison,

lexical literacy and handwriting fluency were significant predictors of writing

productivity (or composition length) and correctness in writing, but vocabulary and

grammatical understanding contributed significantly to writing accuracy. These

findings suggest that evaluation and training should carefully analyze and calibrate

the dimensions of written composition, and that systematic integration of reading and

writing promotes writing growth (Kim, Y.-S. G., & Graham, S. , 2022).

In a study conducted by Kline, Deshler, and Schumaker (1992)

demonstrated that teachers were more receptive to implementing a reading strategy

program based on educational psychology ideas after experiencing its efficacy. As a

result, it is necessary to equip teachers with knowledge about psychological studies,

such as the efficiency of reading strategies and how to teach them effectively.

This requirement is clear, as educational research on how to teach reading

in a traditional classroom setting indicates that teachers do not devote sufficient time

to teaching reading skills. Additionally, Sailors (2009) discovered that teachers

frequently lack information about how to teach reading skills and instead rely on what

they acquired in their own school experiences when it comes to interpreting texts.

While teachers frequently utilize strategies such as summarizing or asking questions

to test reading comprehension, they are rarely taught how to increase it (Hollenbeck

& Kalchman, 2013). Indeed, reading education in a traditional classroom context

frequently falls short of scientifically sound techniques (Stanovich & Stanovich,

2003).

According to Gilchrist-Ward (2019), Implementing effective, best-practice

strategies at the high school level will help ensure that students have first-rate
29

reading comprehension and writing skills—not only as they matriculate through

school, but also as they enter the workforce. Teachers and students choose the most

appropriate strategies according to their needs, purposes, and type of written text,

and the choice may vary from one reader/situation/time/circumstance to another

(Ulker, 2017). To achieve this, Babbitt (2002) introduces eight reading strategies that

a teacher may use to develop a scaffold for their students according to their needs,

abilities, and the type of print they work with. The reading strategies are as follows:

comprehension monitoring, cooperative learning, graphic organizers, story structure,

question answering, question generating, summarization, and multiple strategies.

McNamara (2012) believes that the reading strategies for proficient readers are

different from others. The researcher also introduces three reading comprehension

strategies for those readers, which are: dictionary artifact strategy, contextual word

definition strategy, and character motive strategy. If there are strategies for the

proficient, the author, McNamara (2012) also suggests six reading comprehension

strategies for less successful readers, which are: comprehension monitoring,

paraphrasing, elaboration, logic or common sense, predictions, and bridging. Having

said this, the teachers can observe the students if they are less proficient readers or

proficient readers. It is a good thing that today, different strategies are now available

to assist students in developing deep reading comprehension and improving their

English writing skills, Furthermore, it is good to help students depending on their

respective learning styles.

Strategies for Reading Comprehension and Writing

Journaling

Journaling allows students to write about their reaction to the theme of a text,

react (positively or negatively) to an event in the text, express their views about

controversial ideas in the text, or explore their thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about

the text. Expressing themselves through the written word increases readers'

understanding of the text and highlights the importance of sharing their ideas with
30

others (Gilchrist-Ward, 2019). According to Lynch (2019), journaling cannot only

make students better writers, but it can also expand their higher-order and critical

thinking skills, as well as boost their reading comprehension skills.

Varied Instruction

Teachers must vary instruction to meet the needs of every student. Several

studies have been conducted on the multiple intelligences and how they can be used

to address students’ learning in any academic setting. Howard Gardner of Harvard

University identified nine different intelligences: musical, bodily-kinesthetic, logical-

mathematical, linguistic, spatial, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalist, and

existential. One strategy English teachers can implement to address spatial

intelligence is visual literacy. Pictures and films that relate to the content of various

assignments help students make concrete connections to abstract ideas. The visual

content appeals to their need to "see" meaning in action. For example, the student

may interpret meaning based on body language. Verbal or dramatic readings of

passages help students hear the emotions of literary characters and develop a short-

term understanding of them. This strategy addresses musical intelligence, where

students interpret the meaning of sounds. A change in voice inflection may help

students identify emotional reactions to characters, conflict, and conflict resolution.

Role-playing and problem-solving scenarios are bodily-kinesthetic activities that allow

students to move beyond the assignment to engage with the text and real-life

experiences. Exploring how the natural environment affects the psyche, provides an

opportunity for self-exploration and appreciation of different cultures, beliefs, and

experiences (Gilchrist-Ward, 2019).

Socratic Circles

Socratic circles have been used by many English teachers to help

encourage student participation during reading and group discussions. Socratic

circles give ownership of the conversation and sharing of ideas to the students to

ensure dialogue about a topic. The discussion generally focuses on open-ended


31

questions that foster comprehension of the reading material (Gilchrist-Ward, 2019).

Using the Socratic circle method helps students learn how to talk with each other,

build knowledge based on previous experiences and apply it to new situations, come

up with hypotheses, and change their perceptions of themselves and others while

working with rhetoric and discourse (Copeland, 2005).

English Proficiency

According to University of Southern Queensland, English Proficiency is

defined as the student's ability to use the English language to make and

communicate meaning in spoken and written contexts while completing their program

of study.

English proficiency is essential for the success of a modern society. English is

the third most widely spoken and taught language in the world. English is a global

language, the lingua franca of the modern era, spoken as a first language by more

than 300 million people in over 100 countries and as a second language by more

than 600 million. English proficiency is required for any nation to fully benefit from

global commerce, gain access to cutting-edge science, technology, and innovation,

and exert global influence. Over twenty percent of published literature is written in

English, followed by roughly ten percent each in Mandarin and German. The United

States, in collaboration with other Anglophone nations, should do more to promote

the use of English abroad, particularly in regions where English proficiency is

currently weak and in strategic regions like the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and

Central Asia.

Benefits of English Language Education

According to Runde (n.d.) in his commentary about English Language

Proficiency, English proficiency confers a number of strategic advantages. First,

English is the language of commerce, expansion, and economic growth. Deutsche

Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and even the Beijing-based Asian

Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) use English as their operational language. The
32

elite French National School of Administration expects its graduates to be able to

conduct business in both French and English. With one-fourth of the global

population proficient in English, there are also significant economic benefits. The

ability to communicate with the widest possible customer base necessitates

proficiency in English, and cross-language negotiations in a shared third language

can be more successful than using the native tongue of either company. The text

simply indicates the importance of English proficiency in the workplace, specifically in

the economical setting.

Second, education and research are conducted in English. The majority of

academic journals are published in English. In 2015 to 2016, a record number of

international students enrolled in U.S. higher education institutions, over one million

compared to approximately 300,000 American students studying abroad. English

language proficiency is required for enrollment in U.S. institutions, as well as many

prestigious schools in Europe, Australia, and the rest of the world. To put it shortly,

Runde (n.d.) expresses the prominence and high dominance of English language in

the field of academics, especially in writings.


33

METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the methods used in the study. It also describes the

research design, sources of data, data gathering procedure, research instrument,

and data analysis of the study.

Research Design

This study adopted a descriptive- correlational design to determine the

relationship of reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to the English

proficiency of Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences students of Cavite National

High School – Senior High School. In a descriptive design, a researcher is solely

interested in describing the situation or case of the study. It is a theory-based design

method that is created by gathering, analyzing, and presenting collected data. This

allows a researcher to provide insights into the why and how of research. Descriptive

design helps others better understand the need for the research. If the problem

statement is not clear, you can conduct exploratory research.

Sources of Data

The targeted population for this research study were the six sections of Grade

12 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) students of Cavite National High

School-Senior High School; hence, they were the participants who answered the

survey questionnaire to supply the needed primary data. Secondary data were taken

from reliable websites on the internet, related studies- published and unpublished,

articles in journals and other materials.

Sampling Technique
34

In this study, the researchers used voluntary response sampling. Voluntary

response sampling is defined as a sample made up of participants who have

inclination to participate voluntarily as a part of the sample group. Participants in a

voluntary response sample usually choose to respond to surveys because they have

a strong opinion on the subject of the survey.

Research Instrument

A survey questionnaire created in Google form was used by the researchers

to gather primary data which are the responses of the participants. The first part of

the questionnaire contains the demographic profile of the participants such as email,

name (optional), sex, and their grade and section. The second part consists of a total

of 54 statement strategies. There are 33 reading comprehension strategies including

prior to, during, and after. A total of 21 statement writing strategies including prior to,

during, and after. The statement strategies are expressed in Likert scale options -

Always, Frequently, Sometimes, Seldom, and Never. This part of the questionnaire

was used to determine the reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies

of the participants. The last part of the questionnaire consists of the link for the

English Proficiency test. The English Proficiency Test is a standardized test that is

divided into four parts respectively, Grammar, Vocabulary, and Reading

Comprehension. This part of the questionnaire aims to assess the English proficiency

of the participants.

Data Gathering Procedure

The researchers wrote a letter addressed to the principal of Cavite National

High School through the Assistant Principal, Mr. Rea H. Topacio, asking permission

to conduct the study among Grade 12 students. Once the request was accepted, the

researchers proceeded in the validation of questionnaires. After its validation, they

created a survey questionnaire in Google form, after which, these were disseminated

among Grade-12 Humanities and Social Science students of Cavite National High

School – Senior High School. The handling of questionnaire was done online by
35

sending the link of the Google form survey questionnaire through Facebook. This

procedure secured both the safety of the researchers and of the participants, as they

avoided to interact face-to-face; also, to prevent the leak of information gathered to

those people who are not associated with the study.

Data Analysis

The distribution of survey questionnaire to the actual participants happened

after conducting a pilot testing. The researchers collected 30 samples in order to test

the validity of the instrument. After measuring the data collected from the reading

comprehension strategies and writing strategies, the researchers distributed the

survey questionnaires to the participants, the Humanities and Social Sciences

students of Cavite National High School-Senior High School.

The data gathered from the reading comprehension strategies and writing

strategies were then used to correlate with the English proficiency of the students.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The researchers used Cronbach’s alpha formula to measure the level of

reading and writing skills of the participants.

Formula:

Where:

N = the number of items

c̄ = average covariance between item-pairs

v̄ = average variance

The researchers used Pearson-r for the statistical treatment of the gathered

data. Pearson-r is a statistical tool used to measure the strength of relationship

between two variables and their association with each other. In this study, the
36

researchers aimed to find the relationship between the reading comprehension

strategies and writing strategies to improve students’ English proficiency.

Pearson-r correlation was used to determine the relationship between the

participants’ reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to their English

proficiency.

Formula:

Where:

r = correlation

N = no. of pairs of scores

∑x = sum of x scores

∑y = sum of y scores

∑xy = sum of products of paired scores

∑𝑥2 = sum of squared x scores

∑𝑦2 = sum of squared y scores


37

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter comprises the outcomes of the study in illustrative tables

and their corresponding analysis with the interpretations derived from the

statistical treatment of data.

Results of Pilot Testing

Table 1 shows the Cronbach’s alpha scale. The researchers conducted a

pilot test to 30 random samples. This was done to test the reliability of the

questionnaire adopted from study entitled, “Investigation of Reading and Writing

Strategies Used by Future Teachers: Do Good Readers Write Well” by Ersoy

Topuzkanamış(n.d.). The questionnaire used by the author of this study was the

same questionnaire that the researchers employed to gather data regarding the

reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies of the Humanities and

Social Sciences students of Cavite National High School. The following

describes the results from the pilot testing, with Cronbach’s alpha as the

statistical tool applied to gain results. The table below is Cronbach’s alpha scale

for internal consistency.

Table 1. Cronbach’s alpha scale


CRONBACH’S ALPHA INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
α ≥ 0.9 Excellent
0.9 > α ≥ 0.8 Good
0.8 > α ≥ 0.7 Acceptable
0.7 > α ≥ 0.6 Questionable
38

0.6 > α ≥ 0.5 Poor


0.5 > α Unacceptable

To measure the reliability and feasibility of the questionnaire, the researchers

conducted a pilot testing. The data gathered enabled the researchers to tailor

systematic investigation to the specific needs of the research population. The

participants for the pilot testing are under the same category, which are the Grade 12

HUMSS students, but the participants are studying in other schools. Using the

Cronbach's Alpha formula, the data gathered were strictly analyzed by the

researchers. The tables below depict the reliability statistics of reading

comprehension strategies prior to, during, and after and writing strategies prior to,

during, and after.

Reading Comprehension Strategies

Table 2 depicts the summary of the participants’ answers regarding reading

comprehension strategies. It includes prior to, during, and after reading. The N of

Items which is the total of all the statement strategies combined is 33. The

Cronbach's Alpha summary is 0.953 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on

standardized items summary is 0.955, which indicates good internal consistency. It

means that all the statement strategies items in the test are highly correlated.

Table 2. Reading comprehension strategies reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED N OF ITEMS
ALPHA ON STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.953 .955 33

Prior to Reading

Table 3 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement

strategies prior to reading which has a total of 9. The Cronbach's Alpha for prior to

reading is 0.809 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items is 0.819,
39

which indicates acceptable internal consistency. It means that the items in the test

are highly correlated.

Table 3. Prior to reading reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S ALPHA CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED ON N OF ITEMS
STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.809 .819 9

During Reading

Table 5 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement strategies

during reading which has a total of 14. The Cronbach's Alpha for during reading is

0.938 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items is 0.938 which

indicates good internal consistency. It means that the items in the test are highly

correlated.

Table 4. During reading reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED N OF ITEMS
ALPHA ON STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.938 .938 14

After Reading

Table 5 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement

strategies after reading which has a total of 10. The Cronbach's Alpha for after

reading is 0.874 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items is 0.876,

which indicates acceptable internal consistency. It means that the items in the test

are highly correlated.

Table 5. After reading reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED N OF ITEMS
ALPHA ON STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.874 .876 10

Writing Strategies: Prior to Writing


40

Table 6 depicts the summary of the participant's answers regarding writing

strategies. It includes prior to, during, and after writing. The N of Items which is the

total of all the statement strategies combined is 21. The Cronbach's Alpha summary

is 0.962 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items summary is 0.965,

which indicates good internal consistency. It means that all the statement strategies

items in the test are highly correlated.

Table 6. Writing strategies reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED N OF ITEMS
ALPHA ON STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.962 .965 21

Table 7 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement

strategies prior to writing which is a total of 10. The Cronbach's Alpha for prior to

writing is 0.947 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items is 0.949,

which indicates good internal consistency. It means that the items in the test are

highly correlated.

Table 7. Prior to writing reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED N OF ITEMS
ALPHA ON STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.947 .949 10

During Writing

Table 8 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement

strategies during writing which is a total of 4. The Cronbach's Alpha for during writing

and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items both 0.935, which indicates

good internal consistency. It means that the items in the test are highly correlated.

Table 8. During writing reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S CRONBACH'S ALPHA N OF ITEMS
ALPHA BASED ON
41

STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.935 .935 4

After Writing
Table 9 shows the N of Items, which represents the number of statement

strategies after writing which is a total of 7. The Cronbach's Alpha for during writing is

0.939 and the Cronbach's Alpha based on standardized items is 0.942, which

indicates good internal consistency. It means that the items in the test are highly

correlated.

Table 9. After writing reliability statistics


CRONBACH'S ALPHA CRONBACH'S ALPHA BASED ON N OF ITEMS
STANDARDIZED ITEMS
.939 .942 7

There are six portions that made up the participants' sections in total and it is

from A to F. Out of 40 participants 9 belonged to section A with 22.5 percent; 5

belonged to section B with 12.5 percent; 5 belonged to section C with 12.5 percent;

14 belonged to section D with 35.0 percent; 1 to section E with 2.5 percent; and 6

belonged to section F with 15.0 percent. The result implies that most of the

participants are from the Grade 12-D of Cavite National High School-Sr. High School.

Table 10. Distribution of participation by section


FREQUENCY PERCENT VALID CUMULATIVE
PERCENT PERCENT
12-A 9 22.5 22.5 22.5
12-B 5 12.5 12.5 35.0
12-C 5 12.5 12.5 47.5
Valid 12-D 14 35.0 35.0 82.5
12-E 1 2.5 2.5 85.0
12-F 6 15.0 15.0 100.0
TOTAL 40 100.0 100.0
42

Demographic Profile of the Participants

Table 11 shows the distribution of participants in terms of sex. Among the 40

participants, 21 are female with 52.5 percent; 16 are male with 40.0 percent; and 3 of

them are prefer not to say with 7.5 percent. This implies that most of the participants

of the Grade of 12 Cavite National High School-Sr. High School are female.

Table 11. Distribution of participation according to sex


FREQUENCY PERCENT VALID CUMULATIVE
PERCENT PERCENT
Female 21 52.5 52.5 52.5
Male 16 40.0 40.0 92.5
Prefer not to 7.5 7.5 100.0
say 3

TOTAL 40 100.0 100.0

Reading Comprehension Strategies

Table 12 shows that 52.5 percent of 40 participants from HUMSS students

from Cavite National High School – Senior High School are reading for a purpose.

There were 40 percent of the students took notes while reading to increase

comprehension. 47.50 percent of the participants say that they always use prior

knowledge to increase comprehension. When the text is hard, if necessary, 52.50


43

percent of the participants are always reading aloud to comprehend it. Prior to

reading, 40 percent of the participants are always scanning the text to see what the

text is about. 45 percent of the participants are always reading the text slowly but

carefully to make sure that they comprehend what they are going to read. 45 percent

of the participants frequently question their selves whether the content of what they

are going to read is suitable for their purpose. 42.5 percent of the participants are

frequently doing paraphrasing the important information in the text. Last but not the

least, 35 percent of the participants are frequently looking for the writer’s name (if

provided) prior to reading.

Table 12. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies prior to reading


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIMES SELDOM NEVER
F % F % F % F % F %
I read for a 21 52. 13 32.5 4 10 2 5 - -
purpose. 5

I take notes 8 20 15 37.5 16 40 1 2.5 - -


while reading to
increase
comprehension.

I use prior 19 47. 16 40 4 10 1 2.5 - -


knowledge to 5
increase
comprehension.

When the text is 21 52. 9 22.5 8 20 2 5 - -


hard, if 5
necessary, I
read aloud to
comprehend it.

Prior to reading, 16 4 14 35 8 20 2 5 - -
I scan the text to 0
see what it is
about.
I read the text 16 4 15 37.5 5 12.5 2 5
slowly but 0
carefully to
make sure I
comprehend it.

I question 13 3 18 45 6 15 1 2.5 2 5
whether the 2
content of the
.
text is suitable
for my purpose. 5
44

I paraphrase 10 25 17 42.5 8 20 3 7.5 2 5


important
information in
the text.

I look for the 11 2 14 35 9 22.5 4 10 2 5


writer’s name (if 7
provided) prior
.
to reading.
5

Table 13 shows that 35 percent of the 40 participants were frequently

scanning the text in terms of the characteristics such as the length, structures, and

others. There were 57.5 percent of the participants are always trying to return to the

part that they have read when they lost focus.; 32.5 percent of the participants are

frequently underlining or circle the information in the text to remember it; 35 percent

of the participants are always checking the information and ideas in the text in terms

of their practicality in daily life; 45 percent of the participants are frequently deciding

what points to focus on prior to reading; 35 percent of the participants are always

using a source of reference like dictionaries to increase reading comprehension; 50

percent was always concentrating to comprehend what they read when the text

seems hard. About 47.5 percent said that they always benefit from visuals like

diagrams, pictures, and tables in the text to comprehend what they read. There were

35 percent occasionally stopped to reflect on what they have just read. 40 percent of

the participants use contextual clues to comprehend what they read better. 40

percent of the participants are frequently doing a paraphrasing thought in the text to

comprehend it better and they schematize, illustrate, or visualize the information to

remember what they read. 42.5 percent of the participants are frequently paying

attention to punctuations, and bold or italic items to identify key information in the

text. The last statement shows that 45 percent of the total participants frequently

critically analyze and evaluate the information presented in the text.


45

Table 13. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies during reading


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIMES SELDOM NEVER
F % F % F % F % F %
Prior to 12 30 14 35 9 22.5 1 2.5 4 10
reading I scan
the text in
terms of
characteristics
such as the
length,
structures, etc.

I try to return 2 57. 11 27.5 4 10 2 5 - -


to the part I 3 5
have read
when I lose
focus.

I underline or 6 15 13 32.5 1 27.5 7 17.5 3 7.5


circle the 1
information in
the text to
remember it.

I check the 14 35 13 32.5 1 27.5 7 17.5 3 7.5


information 1
and ideas in
the text in
terms of their
46

practicality in
daily life.

I decide what 14 35 18 45 7 17.5 1 2.5 - -


points to focus
on prior to
reading.

I use sources 14 35 11 27.5 11 27.5 4 10


of reference
like
dictionaries to
increase
reading
comprehensio
n.

When the text 2 50 16 40 2 5 2 5


seems hard, I 0
concentrate to
comprehend
what I read.

I benefit from 19 47. 13 32.5 4 10 2 5 2 5


visuals like 5
diagrams,
pictures, and
tables in the
text to
comprehend
what I read.

I occasionally 10 25 14 35 1 30 3 7.5 1 2.5


stop to reflect 2
on what I have
just read.

Table 13.
10 25 16 40 1 25 3 7.5 1 2.5
I use clues 0
regarding the
context
(contextual
clues) to
comprehend
what I read
better.

I paraphrase 10 25 16 40 9 22.5 5 12.5 - -


thoughts in the
text to
comprehend it
better.

I schematize, 15 37. 16 40 6 15 3 7.5 - -


illustrate, or 5
visualize the
information to
remember
what I read.

I pay attention 16 40 17 42.5 4 10 3 7.5 - -


to
47

punctuations,
bold or italic
items to
identify key
information in
the text.

I critically 11 27. 18 45 7 17.5 4 10 - -


analyze and 5
evaluate the
information
presented in
the text.

Table 14 shows the following statements that the participants are using after

reading. The first statement shows that 40 percent of the total participants are

frequently thoroughly revising the text to detect relationships between thoughts. 35

percent of the participants are always checking what they have previously

comprehended when they come across controversial information in the text. Half of

the total participants or 50 percent are always trying to guess what the text is about

while they read. 45 percent of the participants always reread the text to increase

comprehension level when it seems hard to comprehend. 40 percent of the

participants are always asking themselves questions that they would like to find

answers to in the text. 45 percent of the total participants are always checking if their

predictions about the text are correct and trying to guess unknown words and

phrases in the text. 37.5 percent of the participants frequently rephrase the entire text

in their own words. The last two statements garnered 37.5 percent of the total

participants that they are always adjusting the pace of reading according to the text

and they discuss what they have read with others to check if they have

comprehended the text.


48

Table 14. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies after reading


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIMES SELDOM NEVER
F % F % F % F % F %
I refresh my 16 40 16 40 4 10 4 10 - -
knowledge on
the subject prior
to writing by
discussing with
my friends or
scanning books.

I determine the 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


audience prior
to writing.
2 - -
I determine to 15 37.5 20 50 3 7.5 5
what purpose
my writing will
serve prior to
writing.

I limit the 9 22.5 22 55 4 10 3 7.5 2 5


boundaries for
the topic to
serve my
purpose prior to
writing.

I choose an 15 37.5 14 34 7 17.5 3 7.5 1 2.5


appropriate text
structure to
construct the
content prior to
writing.

I produce ideas 19 47.5 12 30 6 15 2 5 1 2.5


by using
techniques like
brainstorming,
free writing, and
listing prior to
writing.

I organize the 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


ideas I have
produced by
using organizing
techniques like
forming a topic
tree, clustering,
etc., prior to
writing.

I specify main 14 34 17 42.5 7 17.5 2 5 - -


and supporting
ideas, and
organize them
as a text outline
prior to writing.

I note down the 16 40 14 34 6 15 4 10 - -


ideas I have
49

produced prior
to writing.

I use idea 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


enhancing ways
like
exemplification,
elaboration, and
providing
evidence prior to
writing.

Writing Strategies Questionnaire

Table 15 shows the summary of the 40 Humanities and Social Sciences

students of Cavite National High School – Senior High School’s answers to

statement strategies prior to writing. In the first statement, 16 or 40 percent of the

participants were tied who answered that they always and frequently refresh their

knowledge on the subject prior to writing by discussing it with a friend or scanning

books. In the second statement, the majority 15 or 37.5 percent answered that they

always determine the audience first. In the third statement, half of the participants

which is a total of 20 or 50 percent answered that they frequently determine what

would be the purpose of their writing, In the fourth statement, 22 or 55 percent said

that they frequently limit the boundaries for the topic to serve the purpose of the

writing. In the fifth statement, 15 or 37.5 percent answered that they always choose

an appropriate text structure to construct the content. In the sixth statement, almost

half of the participants which is 19 or 47.5 percent answered that they produce ideas

by using techniques like brainstorming, free writing, and listing. In the seventh

statement, the majority of 15 which is a total of 37.5 percent always organize their

ideas by using organizing techniques like forming a topic tree, clustering, and others.

In the eighth statement, it shows that 17 or 42.5 percent answered that they

frequently specify the main and supporting ideas, and organize them as a text

outline. In the ninth statement, the majority of the participants which is 16 or 40

percent answered that they always note down their ideas. Lastly, in the tenth
50

statement, a total of 15 or 37.50 percent said that they always use idea-enhancing

ways like exemplification, elaboration, and providing evidence.

Table 15. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies prior to writing


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIME SELDOM NEVER
S
F % F % F % F % F %
I refresh my 16 40 16 40 4 10 4 10 - -
knowledge on
the subject prior
to writing by
discussing with
my friends or
scanning books.

I determine the 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


audience prior
to writing.

I determine to 15 37.5 20 50 3 7.5 2 5 - -


what purpose
my writing will
serve prior to
writing.

I limit the 9 22.5 22 55 4 10 3 7.5 2 5


boundaries for
the topic to
serve my
purpose prior to
writing.

I choose an 15 37.5 14 34 7 17.5 3 7.5 1 2.5


appropriate text
structure to
construct the
content prior to
writing.

I produce ideas 19 47.5 12 30 6 15 2 5 1 2.5


by using
techniques like
brainstorming,
free writing, and
listing prior to
writing.

I organize the 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


ideas I have
produced by
using organizing
techniques like
forming a topic
tree, clustering,
etc., prior to
writing.

I specify main 14 34 17 42.5 7 17.5 2 5 - -


51

and supporting
ideas, and
organize them
as a text outline
prior to writing.
I note down the 16 40 14 34 6 15 4 10 - -
ideas I have
produced prior
to writing.

I use idea 15 37.5 13 32.5 9 22.5 3 7.5 - -


enhancing ways
like
exemplification,
elaboration, and
providing
evidence prior to
writing.

Table 16 shows the summary of the 40 Humanities and Social Sciences

students of Cavite National High School – Senior High School’s answers to

statement strategies during writing. In the first statement, the majority of 18

participants which is a total of 45 percent answered that they always edit the text in

terms of content by revising what is already written. In the second statement, the

participants who answered always and frequently are tied. They both have a total of

17 answers which is a total of 42.5 percent. They said that they edit the text in terms

of superficial (spelling and punctuation) elements. In the third statement, 19 or 47.5

percent of the participants answered that they always revise the text in terms of

appropriateness to the purpose of the writing. Lastly, in the fourth statement, the

always and frequently options, both have 15 or 37.5 percent of answers that

participants revise the text in terms of appropriateness to the text structure.


52

Table 16. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies during writing


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIMES SELDOM NEVER
F % F % F % F % F %
I edit the text in 18 45 14 34 7 17.5 1 2.5 - -
terms of content
by revising what
I have written
during writing.

I edit the text in 17 42.5 17 42.5 3 7.5 3 7.5 - -


terms of
superficial
(spelling and
punctuation)
elements by
revising what I
have written
during writing.

I revise the text 19 47.5 8 20 10 25 1 2.5 2 5


in terms of
appropriateness
to the purpose
during writing.

I revise the text 15 37.5 15 37.5 8 20 - - 2 5


in terms of
appropriateness
to the text
structure during
writing.

Table 17 shows the summary of the 40 Humanities and Social Sciences

students of Cavite National High School – Senior High School’s answers to

statement strategies after writing. In the first statement, the majority of 16 or 40

percent of participants answered that they always evaluate the text in terms of

content. The same 16 participants which is a total of 40 percent answered that they

always evaluate and edit the text in terms of superficial (spelling and grammar)

elements. In the third statement, the majority of 16 or 40 percent of the participants

said that they frequently evaluate and edit the text in terms of suitability to the

purpose. In the fourth statement, a total of 16 participants which is equivalent to 40

percent said that they always evaluate and edit the text in terms of suitability to the
53

text structure. In the fifth statement and sixth statement, a total of 14 or 34 percent of

the participants answered that they always ask a friend to read and criticize the text

in terms of content and in terms of superficial (spelling and punctuation) elements.

Lastly, the seventh statement, majority of the participants answered that they always

ask a friend to read and criticize the text in terms of structure.

Table 17. Descriptive statistics regarding the strategies after writing


STRATEGY ALWAYS FREQUENTLY SOMETIMES SELDOM NEVER
F % F % F % F % F %
I evaluate the 16 40 15 37.5 7 17.5 1 2.5 1 2.5
text in terms of
content after
writing.

I evaluate and 16 40 14 34 7 17.5 2 5 1 2.5


edit the text in
terms of
superficial
(spelling and
punctuation)
elements after
writing.

I evaluate and 14 34 16 40 8 20 1 2.5 1 2.5


edit the text in
terms of
suitability to
my purpose
after writing.

I evaluate and 16 40 13 32.5 9 22.5 2 5 - -


edit the text in
terms of
suitability to
text structure
after writing.

I ask my friend 14 34 12 30 8 20 5 12.5 1 2.5


to read and
criticize the
text in terms of
content after
writing.

I ask my friend 14 34 11 27.5 6 15 9 22.5 - -


to read and
criticize the
text in terms of
superficial
(spelling and
punctuation)
54

elements after
writing.

I ask my friend 15 37.5 9 22.5 9 22.5 6 15 1 2.5


to read and
criticize the
text in terms of
structure.

English Proficiency Test

Table 18 shows the HUMSS students’ grammar percentage results, based on

the standardized English Proficiency Test. With the number of 40 participants, only

one student achieved 88 percent from the first part of the Grammar Test, which is the

highest out of the 40 responses. Besides this, a student was able to attain 85 percent

being second to the highest. 15 of them had a passing grade having 78 percent to 84

percent grade. The remaining 23 students had a low percentage, specifically in this

range 20 percent to 76 percent.

Table 18. Grammar 1 percentage


NUMBER OF GRAMMAR 1 REMARKS
RESPONSES PERCENTAGE
1 88 Very satisfactory
3 87 Very satisfactory
1 85 Very satisfactory
5 84 Satisfactory
5 82 Satisfactory
5 78 Fairly satisfactory
2 76 Fairly satisfactory
3 73 Did not meet expectations
3 71 Did not meet expectations
2 69 Did not meet expectations
1 60 Did not meet expectations
2 58 Did not meet expectations
1 56 Did not meet expectations
2 53 Did not meet expectations
2 49 Did not meet expectations
1 45 Did not meet expectations
1 36 Did not meet expectations
2 20 Did not meet expectations
55

Table 19 shows the results from the second part of the grammar test in the

English Proficiency Test taken by the HUMSS students of Cavite National High

School. The highest score attained is 93 percent by 3 students. 2 of the HUMSS

students had the same percentage, which is 87 percent, being the second to the

highest among the responses. 7 students achieved a passing score, within this

range: 76 percent to 85 percent. While the remaining 30 students received a low

percentage (10% to 69%).

Table 19. Grammar 2 percentage


GRAMMAR 1 REMARKS
NO. OF RESPONSES
PERCENTAGE
6 100 Outstanding
3 93 Outstanding
2 87 Very satisfactory
1 85 Very satisfactory
1 84 Satisfactory
2 82 Satisfactory
4 80 Fairly satisfactory
3 78 Fairly satisfactory
3 76 Fairly satisfactory
3 73 Did not meet expectations
2 69 Did not meet expectations
2 69 Did not meet expectations
3 67 Did not meet expectations
2 64 Did not meet expectations
2 58 Did not meet expectations
2 44 Did not meet expectations
2 30 Did not meet expectations
1 20 Did not meet expectations

Table 20 shows the percentage of the HUMSS students’ vocabulary test

results from the standardized English Proficiency Test. The highest percentage of the
56

test result is 100 percent attained by 3 students. While 5 students were able to get 87

percent, being second to the highest grades among the responses. 8 students were

able to get average test scores from 75 percent to 83 percent. The remaining 24

students got a failing remark on their test result. 20 percent was the lowest

percentage attained by 1 student.

Table 20. Vocabulary percentage


VOCABULARY
NO. OF RESPONSES REMARK
PERCENTAGE
3 100 Outstanding
5 87 Very Satisfactory
4 83 Satisfactory
2 80 Satisfactory
1 77 Fairly Satisfactory
1 75 Fairly Satisfactory
2 73 Did not meet Expectations
2 70 Did not meet Expectations
1 67 Did not meet Expectations
2 63 Did not meet Expectations
2 60 Did not meet Expectations
1 83 Did not meet Expectations
1 59 Did not meet Expectations
1 53 Did not meet Expectations
2 50 Did not meet Expectations
1 43 Did not meet Expectations
1 30 Did not meet Expectations
1 20 Did not meet Expectations
57

Table 21. Reading comprehension percentage


NO. OF RESPONSES PERCENTAGE REMARKS
3 100 Outstanding
2 90 Outstanding
4 84 Satisfactory
4 83 Satisfactory
5 80 Satisfactory
2 77 Fairly Satisfactory
6 73 Fairly Satisfactory
1 70 Did not meet Expectations
1 67 Did not meet Expectations
1 62 Did not meet Expectations
1 57 Did not meet Expectations
1 53 Did not meet Expectations
1 50 Did not meet Expectations
1 37 Did not meet Expectations
1 33 Did not meet Expectations
1 30 Did not meet Expectations
1 20 Did not meet Expectations
3 7 Did not meet Expectations
1 27 Did not meet Expectations
Table 22 shows the summary of analyzation of the data gathered.

Specifically, it depicts the correlation coefficient and the P-value of prior to, during,

and after reading comprehension strategies and their relationship with the English

Proficiency. The correlation coefficient of the prior to reading comprehension

strategies and English Proficiency is -0.180, which means that there is a low negative

correlation. The P-value is 0.267, which implies that there is no significant

relationship between the two. The correlation coefficient for the during reading

comprehension strategies and English Proficiency is -0.066, which means that there

is a low negative correlation and the P-value is 0.687, which means that there is no
58

significant relationship between the two. Lastly, the correlation coefficient for the after

reading comprehension strategies and English Proficiency is 0.040, which means

that there is a low positive correlation and the P-value is 0.806, which means that

there is no significant relationship between the two. To sum it all up, there is no

significant relationship between the prior to, during, and after reading comprehension

strategies and the

HUMSS student’s English proficiency.

Table 22. The relationship between reading comprehension strategies and


English proficiency
CORRELATION VERBAL
VARIABLES P-VALUE
COEFFICIENT INTERPRETATION
Prior to reading
comprehension
Low Negative
strategies and -0.180 0.267
Correlation
English proficiency

During reading
comprehension
Low Negative
strategies and -0.066 0.687
Correlation
English Proficiency

After reading
comprehension Low Positive
0.040 0.806
strategies and Correlation
English Proficiency

Table 23 shows the summary of analyzation of the data gathered.

Specifically, it depicts the correlation coefficient and the P-value of prior to, during,

and after writing strategies and their relationship with the English Proficiency. The

correlation coefficient of the prior to writing strategies and English Proficiency is -

0.016, which means that there is a low negative correlation and the P-value is 0.922,

which means that there is no significant relationship between the two. The correlation

coefficient for during writing strategies and English Proficiency is -0.098, which

means that there is a low negative correlation and the P-value is 0.547, which means
59

that there is no significant relationship between the two. Lastly, the correlation

coefficient for the after writing strategies and English Proficiency is -0.084, which

means that there is a low negative correlation and the P-value is 0.607, which means

that there is no significant relationship between the two. To sum it all up, there is no

significant relationship between the prior to, during, and after writing strategies and

the HUMSS student’s English Proficiency.

Table 23. The relationship between writing strategies and English proficiency
CORRELATION VERBAL
VARIABLES P-VALUE
COEFFICIENT INTERPRETATION
Prior to writing
strategies and Low Negative
-0.016 0.922
English proficiency Correlation

During writing
strategies and Low Negative
-0.098 0.547
English Proficiency Correlation

After writing
strategies and Low Negative
-0.084 0.607
English Proficiency Correlation
60

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of the findings, conclusions drawn, and

recommendations based on the data analyzed in the previous chapter. Contents of

each section are described below:

Summary

This study focused on the reading comprehension strategies and writing

strategies to the English proficiency of Humanities and Social Sciences students of

Cavite National High School-Senior High School. Specifically, it aimed to determine

the: 1. HUMSS students’ level of reading skills prior, during, and after reading; 2.

HUMSS students’ level of writing skills prior, during, and after writing, to determine

their level of English proficiency; and, 3. to determine if there is a significant

relationship between reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to

improve English proficiency of the HUMSS students. The participants were

Humanities and Social Sciences students at Cavite National High School during

academic year 2021-2022.

In conducting the study, a Google Form survey is given to the Grade-12

Humanities and Social Sciences students of Cavite National High School – Senior

High School only. The questionnaire is divided into four parts; the first is the student’s

demographic profile, which includes their email, name (optional), grade and section,

and sex. The second part of the questionnaire consists of statement strategies prior

to, during, and after reading. The third part of the questionnaire consists of statement

strategies prior to, during, and after writing. In order for the participants to answer the

statements, the researchers used a Likert scale, wherein the choices are “always”,
61

“frequently”, “sometimes”, “seldom”, and “never”. The last part of the questionnaire

includes the English Proficiency Test, the link was provided in the questionnaire.

The researchers used Cronbach’s alpha formula to measure the level of

reading and writing skills of the Humanities and Social Sciences students. The

Pearson-r moment of correlation was applied to determine the relationship between

reading comprehension strategies and writing strategies to the English proficiency of

the HUMSS students.

The researchers analyzed all the data gathered and the result of the study

concluded that there is no significant relationship between the reading

comprehension strategies prior to, during, and after, and writing strategies prior to,

during, and after with the HUMSS students’ English proficiency.

After thorough analysis of gathered data, the researchers derived these

findings: Using the Cronbach’s alpha formula and Pearson-r test, the computed data

resulted that the correlation coefficient of the prior to reading comprehension

strategies and English Proficiency was -0.180, which means that there is a low

negative correlation and the P-value is 0.267; hence, there is no significant

relationship between the two. The correlation coefficient during reading

comprehension strategies and English Proficiency was -0.066, which means that

there is a low negative correlation and the P-value is 0.687; therefore, there is no

significant relationship between the two. Lastly, the correlation coefficient after

reading comprehension strategies and English Proficiency was 0.040, which means

that there is a low positive correlation and the P-value is 0.806. This result showed

that there is no significant relationship between the two. A study about reading-

writing relations suggests that reading and writing are interconnected. It states that

written composition is a multifaceted phenomenon, each dimension requiring a

particular set of language and cognitive abilities Kim, Y.-S. G., & Graham, S. (2022).

However, even though reading and writing are interconnected, those two did not

have a significant relationship to English proficiency.


62

Conclusion

All the data gathered from the Grade 12 HUMSS participants were strictly

interpreted by the researchers. The hypothesis of the study that there is no

relationship between the reading comprehension strategies prior to, during, and after,

and writing strategies prior to, during, and after with the HUMSS students’ English

proficiency was accepted.

Recommendations

In light of the results and findings of this study, the researchers offer the

following recommendations:

To curriculum makers, they may include literature in all grade levels and

programs, for the role of literature in education and English proficiency are closely

related. Literature can broaden students’ viewpoints, cultures, and world views

beside improve their grasp of the target language.

Furthermore, the researchers recommend teachers to become more

innovative in their instruction (of literature) and become sensible in choosing which

literary piece to employ, as literature plays an important role in shaping the interests

of the students.

Having said that, the researchers recommend future researchers may

conduct a related study with focus on literature that involves comprehensive reading.

This statement is supported by this study entitled “Literature Improve English

Proficiency: The Students' Perspective.” The following selection describes how the

study mentioned helped Malaysia to improve their English proficiency (with regard to

the PISA results).


63

REFERENCES

Allison Doyle. (May 2017). Communication skills for the workplace: The balance
careers. Retrieved from https://www.the balanceca reers.com/communication-
skills-list2063779

Arizona Education News Service (March 2015) Retrieved from


https://azednews.com/communication-collaboration-are-keyto-success-in-
school-workplace-life/.

Babbitt, P. (2002). Scaffolding: Strategies for improving reading comprehension


skills. Retrieved October 26, 2014, from Pearson:
www.phschool.com/eteach/language_arts/2002_12/essay.html

Blachowicz, C. L., and Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension: Strategies for


independent learners (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Hanaa Youssef Shaarawy. (October 2014). “The effect of journal writing on students’
cognitive critical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental research on an English
as a foreign language (EFL) undergraduate classroom in Egypt, International
Journal of Higher Education 3:4: 120-128. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p120.

Howard Gardner. (March 2014). In a nutshell, multiple intelligences: New horizons in


theory and practice (New York: Basic Books, 2006), 5-31:
https://howardgardner01.files.word press.com/2012/06/in-a-nutshell-minh.pdf;
Mark Vital, “9 Types of Intelligence—Infographics”): https://blog.
adioma.com/9-types-of-intelligence-info graphic/.

Joanne Cooper. (2013). Keeping a journal: A path to uncovering identity and keeping
your sanity. Educational Perspectives 46: 1-2): 40-43. ERIC Document No.
EJ1088286.

McNamara, D. S. (2009). The importance of teaching reading strategies.


Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 35(2), 34-38.

McNamara, D. S. (2012). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, inventions,


and technologies. New Jersey: Psychology Press.

Morten Asfeldt. (2012). Group journaling: A tool for reflection, fun and group
development,” pathways. The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education 24:4 14:
http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ994017.pdf. 

Medina, C. (2007). Introduction. in c. medina, successful strategies for reading in the


content areas (pp. 4-14). Huntington Beach: Shell Educational Publishing.
64

Mozayan, M. R., Fazilatfar, A. M., Khosravi, A., and Askari, J. (2012 November). The
role of semantic mapping as a while-reading activity in improving reading
comprehension ability of the Iranian University students in general English
(GE) courses. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2422-2429.

Virginia Kohl, Becky Dressler, and John Hoback. (2001). The roles of a visual literacy
component in middle school language arts curricula: A case study with at-risk
students and their teachers.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
National Communication Association, Atlanta, Ga.,

APPENDICES

Appendix Figure 1. Research Instrument


65
66
67
68
69
70
71

Appendix Figure 2. Letter of Request


72
73
74

Appendix Figure 3. Timetable of Activities


75
76

Appendix Figure 4. Routing Slip


77

Republic of the Philippines


CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY
Cavite City Campus
Pulo II, Dalahican, Cavite City
Tel. (046) 4313570/ (046) 4313580

DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER EDUCATION AND LANGUAGES

ROUTING SLIP

Name Signature

David, Ven Allen A. ____________________


Macali, Queeny Venish ____________________
Ramirez, Janica Mae F. ____________________
Sembrano, Wella Yvonne L. ____________________
Tan, Rayn Waukee M. ____________________

Degree: BSE-English Type of Study: Undergraduate


Thesis

Title: READING COMPREHENSION AND WRITING STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE


ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES TRACK
OF CAVITE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Remarks Date Date Signature


Received Released

ERLINDA CAERLANG
Research Adviser

JEREMIAS L. JANGAD, MA Ed
Technical Critic

MARIA CRISTINA J. BAESA,


MA Ed
Department Chair

SUSANA C. SAN PEDRO


Accredited English Critic

GELUCILE BACONES
Campus Coordination, RDE

MARIA CRISTINA J. BAESA,


MA Ed
Campus Administrator
78

Appendix Figure 5. RD Forms


79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87

Appendix Figure 6. English Critic Certification


88

Republic of the Philippines


CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
Cavite City Campus
Pulo II, Dalahican, Cavite City
Tel. (046) 431-35-70; (046) 431-35-

ENGLISH CRITIC CERTIFICATION


( X ) THESIS ( ) EDP ( ) NARRATIVE REPORT

_______________
DATE

To whom it may concern:

This is to certify that the research manuscript of:

Ven Allen A. David 201910152


Queeny Venish Macali 201910155
Janica Mae F. Ramirez 201910090
Wella Yvonne L. Sembrano 201910094
Rayn Waukee M. Tan 201910113

with the title, Reading Comprehension Strategies and Writing Strategies to the
English Proficiency of the Humanities and Social Sciences Students of Cavite
National High School-Senior High School, has been read and edited and is now
ready for final reproduction.

SUSANA C. SAN PEDRO


Accredited English Critic

You might also like