REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

 
FOREIGN LITERATURE
 

According to Yong, Kusumarini, and Tedjokoesoemo (2015), this study focuses on

the advantages that students will experience when using CAD software. The goal is
to learn how students perceive the usefulness of 2D and 3D. After completing the
AutoCad software, they responded to a poll survey using the SUS (System Usability
Scale). The data were collected and examined by statistical analysis to show
differences between SketchUp and AutoCad. They prove that SketchUp is less
usable than AutoCAD. In addition, Zakaria, Abu, and Othman (2012), They claim that
students with the most modest abilities perform better when the teachers employ
3D software in classes. This proves that AutoCad software is useful and
sophisticated for students. Today will make it much simpler to understand what
engineers have in mind. AutoCAD software can be essential in assisting students in
overcoming obstacles while they learn objectives for automotive engineering
designs. However, Runmei & Yehuan (2017) found that the program with the largest
user base is AutoCad. When producing many types of design drawings for the same
product, they have numerous tasks that must be completed. The standard method
involves using an application to produce drawings, but it also has a number of
additional shortcomings, such as low efficiency, a high error rate, and a high input
cost when examining the functional extension of the plane drawing. This tool
accesses databases and supports development. Therefore, Irawan & Affandi (2017),
heavily emphasize the use of AutoCAD 2D. Students frequently use software to
stimulate the product design process as part of their project. The students' ability to
create prototypes and advance their projects is hampered by the poor quality of 2D
technical drawings. It aims to pinpoint the issues that hindered students proficiency
with AutoCad 2D engineering drawings.