Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student Project (Unedit)
Student Project (Unedit)
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
There are several names for TB. It was called phthisis in ancient Greece,
tabes in ancient Rome, and schachepheth in ancient Hebrew. On 1882, Dr. Robert
Koch discovered Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacteria that causes TB. During
this time, TB killed one out of every seven people living in the United States and
Europe.2
1
TB is a treatable and curable disease. Active, drug-susceptible TB disease
is treated with a standard 6 month course of 4 antimicrobial drugs. Anti-TB
medicines have been used for decades and strains that are resistant to 1 or more of
the medicines have been documented in every country surveyed.1
2
1.2.12. What are the complications of Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
(MDR-TB)?
3
CHAPTER II
CONTENT
4
12 weeks.8 For persons with intact cell-mediated immunity, the next defensive
step is formation of granulomas from accumulation of activated T lymphocytes
and macrophages. This environment destroys macrophages and produces solid
necrosis at the center of the lesion.9 By 2 or 3 weeks the necrotic environment
resembles soft cheese, often called caseous necrosis, and characterized by low
oxygen levels, low pH, and limited nutrients. For less immunocompetent persons,
granuloma formation is initiated yet ultimately is unsuccessful in containing the
bacilli. The necrotic tissue undergoes liquefaction, and the fibrous wall loses
structural integrity. The semiliquid necrotic can drain into bronchus or nearby
blood vessel, leaving an air-filled cavity at the original site. If goes to bronchus
the person becomes infectious, if goes to blood vessel the occurrence of
extrapulmonary tuberculosis is likely.10
5
start only if a second positive result is made or the patient have been referred to an
experienced medical officer. If the patient has been treated for more than a month
with anti tuberculosis drugs previously, such patient require very careful follow
up and a different treatment compared to those who has never been treated before.
There are 2 phases of medication; intensive phase which is the first 1-2 months of
adequate dose of drugs and continuous phase which is the next months with less
dosage to ensure the microbacteria has been eradicted form the patient.11
There are only limited numbers of drugs currently available for the
treatment of TB. For that reason, medical staffs should be very cautious to
prescribe these drugs to prevent resistance. According to WHO, anti TB drugs can
be classified into five groups based on the efficacy, experience of use, safety, and
drug class (Table 1)
Groups Drugs
6
streptomycin and kanamycin, or is DRS
data show high rates of resistance to
amikacin and kanamycin, Cm should be
used.
Group 3: Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin (Cfx);
Gatifloxacin (Gfx).
7
dose H);
Clarithromycin (Clr)
The choices of the first line treatment regimen for patients who has never
been treated for as much as one month are as follwing; rifampicin plus isoniazid
are given daily for six months. During the intensive phase, the durgs are
strengthened with pyrazinamide plus ethambutol. (see figure 1) As for patients
who have been exposed to first line of anti TB drugs for more than one month,
including patients who relapses ( become smear positive again after declared
cured or treatment compleated), treatment after failure ( while on treatment, smear
positive for more than 5 months), and treatment after default (return to treatment
and are smear positive after having interrupted treatment for more than 2 months).
The treatment recommended for these patients are of 8 months duration with
rifampicin and isoniazid and is added with pyrazinamide, ethambutol,
streptomycin during the first 2 months (see figure 2). Keep in mind that patients
who are proven to have multidrugs resistant TB should require different
treatments.11
8
Figure 2. Number of tablets taken daily for adults on treatment according to
body weight and the content of the tablets for patients given treatment for
TB before11
Side effect of anti TB drugs (figure 3) can lower life quality of the
patients, therefore, it should be important to know some of the inications to stop
or continue the medications as instructed below.
9
Numbness or tingling caused by isoniazid, can be cured with vitamin B6 at
dose of 50mg daily
Joint symptoms, usually caused by pyrazinamide, can be cured with
acetylsalicylic acid
Red/orange body fluids, caused by rifampicin
10
2.5 Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistance Tuberculosis
11
outcomes for this group of patients are far worse than for patients with fully drug
susceptible or lesser forms of drug resistant tuberculosis. Multidrug resistant
tuberculosis with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone (such as ofloxacin
or moxifloxacin), also any one of the three second line injectable agents
(amikacin, capreomycin, kanamycin) is designated as extensively drug resistant
tuberculosis (XDR-TB). Accumulations of mutations in individual drug target
genes involved in generation of MDR-TB are listed as below.20, 22
Drugs Genes
Resistance to INH, the most important first line anti-TB drug, can be
mediated by several genetic mutations involving ndh, kasA, inhA, ahcP, and katG.
INH is a pro-drug that requires activation by the catalase/peroxidase enzyme
encoded by katG, but it is reported that katG-activated INH inhibits inhA (the
target for INH), inhibits the NADH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase
to interfere with mycolic acid (indispensable element of its cell wall) synthesis.
Therefore, any mutation that reduces the activity of either inhA or katG, will result
12
in resistance to INH. The most common mutations of inhA is hugely targeted in
the promoter region. In addition, mutation in the inhA gene can cause resistance to
a second line drug, ETH. It was probably due to the structural similarity of ETH
with INH.20, 22
Other than two mechanisms explained above, there are also several
mechanisms related to drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that
probably cause antibiotic resistance in MDR-TB, such as: role of non-adherence
period, pharmacokinetic variability of the drug, and the role of efflux pumps.
Those mechanisms explained as below.23, 24
13
dependent low-level resistance process, allows the bacteria time to
undergo multiple rounds of replication under suboptimal antibiotic
pressure or monotherapy, allowing for development of mutations in the
canonical drug resistance genes, in efflux pump genes, or in negative
regulators of efflux pumps.
a. Latent Tuberculosis
At this stage, there are no clinical symptoms found as well as radiological
or microbiological evidence of the disease.27 This stage occurs when the pathogen
resides and stay dormant inside the host’s body. However, it may progress and
become active during the lifetime of individual if immune system becomes
compromised.
b. Primary Disease
From the latent stage, the pathogen may become active yet often
asymptomatic with some self-limiting clinical findings.26 As an example, pleural
effusion may occur due to bacterial infiltration of pleural space and cause
symptoms such as chest pain, fever, and dyspnea.
14
d. Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is defined as any site of infection in
the body other than the lung parenchyma. This results from the hematogenous and
lymphatic spread of the pathogen.29 The most common form of EPTB and occurs
due to infection of lymph nodes is lymph node tuberculosis. 30 This type of EPTB
mainly affects children and young adults presenting with enlarged lymph nodes
and are usually asymptomatic. The most common location is cervical lymph
nodes, followed by supraclavicular, axillary, thoracic, and abdominal nodes.31
15
TB drugs antibiotics to distinguish between susceptible and resistant
strains on solid media. While relatively inexpensive and undemanding
of sophisticated equipment, results usually take up to 8 weeks and this
is challenging. Delayed identification of drug resistance results in
inadequate treatment, which may generate additional drug resistance.34
1.2. Liquid Culture-Based Methods
Automated liquid culture systems are more sensitive than solid media
cultures, and they significantly reduce the time. However, even with
liquid cultures, two to four weeks are still needed to obtain results, and
their substantially higher cost is an issue for resource-limited
countries.34
1.3. Novel, Rapid Phenotypic Methods
Microcolony method is one of the novel and rapid methods that
relatively low cost. It has been adapted for the rapid detection of drug
resistance directly from sputum samples, and has been shown in early
studies to be accurate for the detection of MDR-TB compared with the
methods mentioned before, with results available in one week. Newly
developed phenotypic tests are usually cheaper but not always simple
to perform, with some requiring high standards of biosafety and
quality control.34
Though consume more time than molecular DST, phenotypic DST for first-
line agents (isoniazid (H) and rifampicin(R)) and selected second-line anti-
TB drugs (kanamycin, amikacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin) are generally
reliable.33
2. Molecular (Genotypic) Methods (Line Probe Assay [LPA] and Xpert MTB)
Molecular methods have considerable advantages for programmatic
management of DR-TB, in particular with regard to their speed, the
standardization of testing, their potentially high throughput and the reduced
requirements for laboratory biosafety. Molecular tools are based on
polymerase chain reaction techniques to detect the genetic mutations that are
known to resistance to drugs. Molecular tests for detecting drug resistance
16
to rifampicin (R) alone or in combination with isoniazid (H) have been
recommended for use by WHO since 2008. 33,35
Specifically, a positive molecular test for rifampicin (R) resistance can be
considered diagnostic for MDR-TB, because in most countries, greater than 90%
of rifampicin-resistant strains are also resistant to isoniazid (H). All patients
diagnosed with resistance to rifampicin (R) and/or isoniazid (H) should be tested
further, includes testing for resistance to the three second-line injectable drugs
(SLID) such as levofloxacin, amikacin, and capreomycin, and at least one
fluoroquinolone (FQ). Standard phenotypic tests must also be performed; while
these take longer and support the treatment decision, they can resolve any
discrepancies between the methods.35
17
24 months with the reported global cure rate by WHO accounted for 48% - lower
than the number of those considered best (60-80%).37
18
Figure 3. General principles in designing an MDR-TB treatment regimen.39
19
Dosing of anti-TB drugs is based on the weight of the patient. Even though
anti-TB are generally given once a day to improve peak-dependent killing, many
of those second-line anti-TB drugs have severe side effects that can be reduced by
twice-daily divided dosing.38
20
2.10.3. Monitoring and Duration of the Treatment
Timely and intensive monitoring for, and management of, adverse effects
caused by second-line drugs are important for MDR-TB. To assess treatment
response, sputum smears and cultures should be performed monthly until smear
21
and culture conversion (two consecutive negative smears and cultures taken 30
days apart). After a conversion, the minimum frequency recommended for
bacteriological monitoring is monthly for smears and quarterly for cultures. Each
patient’s weight should be assessed monthly.39
Second-line drugs have more side effects compared to the firs-line anti-
TB. Mismanagement of side effects is the major reason why patients do not
adhere or continue to take MDR-TB treatment, thus it is the responsibility of the
clinician to diagnose and manage them. Patient should be screened for side-effects
of medications. Clinical and laboratory services can help detecting side-effects,
and medications to treat adverse effects when they occur.38,39
Mild side effects are common, and can be managed symptomatically with
ancillary drugs without altering the treatment the treatment regimen. Side effects
often diminish over time, allowing patients to finish their treatment.38
22
supportive therapy
23
The treatment success rate in patients with non MDR TB Infections was
higher than MDR-TB infections.40 Treating patients with multidrug-resistant
tuberculosis (MDR-TB) strains is more complicated, complex, toxic, expensive,
than treating patients with suspectable TB strains. Previous use of second- line
drugs have been documented as significant risk factors for poor treatment
outcome due to the development of more drug resistance. 41 People who has HIV-
Positive, male gender, smoking, diabetes history, alcoholic, lower education has
higher risk factors for poor outcome and increase of death in populations, but
good outcome will be reached if the patient use MDR TB therapy at least 18
months, directly observed therapy throughout treatment,no previous treatment and
being educated about their situations.42,43
24
injectable drugs. It is reversible once the injectable is suspended, but it may take
weeks or months to be resolved completely. Because electrolyte wasting is
generally managed with electrolyte replacement therapy, serum potassium should
be checked at least monthly in all patients during the initial injectable phase.
Hypothyroidism can be induced by prolonged exposure to PAS or
ethionamide/prothionamide. The exact incidence of hypothyroidism during MDR-
TB treatment is unknown, but rates of up to 80% have been reported in some
patient populations. Because symptoms are nonspecific, all patients should be
screened for hypothyroidism starting after the third month of MDR-TB treatment.
Neurotoxic effects such as psychosis or depression can be caused by cycloserine.
Clinicians should screen patients for abnormal behavior and symptoms of
depression, anxiety, and agitation on a regular basis. Ototoxicity can be caused by
the injectables, which can cause damage to cranial nerve VIII. This may result in
hearing loss, tinnitus (ringing in the ear), or other vestibular symptoms such as
nystagmus, ataxia, and disequilibrium. Hearing loss is generally not reversible on
discontinuation of therapy. Hearing and balance should be assessed at least
monthly while the patient is receiving the injectable. Where available, audiometry
should be performed monthly and is an excellent way of detecting early hearing
loss.44,45
The patient's skin and eyes appear yellow, Hearing is reduced or the ears
are buzzing, Hearing voices, hallucinations, delusions, Severe allergic reactions
namely anaphylactic shock and angionerotic edema, must be immediately handled
by the clinic doctor according to standard shock management before being
referred to the referral hospital MDR-TB, Another severe allergic reaction in the
form of redness of the mucosa (mucous membrane) such as the mouth, eyes and
can affect the entire body in the form of exfoliation (Steven Johnsons
Syndrome).46
CHAPTER III
25
CONCLUSION
Treatment for MDR-TB at least four second-line anti-TB drugs with either
certain, or almost certain, effectiveness. All regimens should include a later
generation fluoroquinolone such as levofloxacin or moxifloxacin (a second-line
injectable drug, and other oral second-line drugs). Pyrazinamide may also be
included unless contraindicated (history of drug allergy or evidence of
ineffectiveness against the patient’s strain). Timely and intensive monitoring for,
26
and management of, adverse effects caused by second-line drugs are important for
MDR-TB.
27
REFERENCE
28
of Tuberculosis: a guide to the essentials of good practice. Paris, France:
International Union Agaunst Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2010. pp.27-
38
12. Seung KJ, Keshavjee S, Rich ML. Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Cold
Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015.
13. WHO. Treatment of Tuberculosis Guidelines 4th Edition. 2009.
14. Health Department Republic of South Africa. National Tuberculosis
Mangement Guidelines . 2014 .pp.43
15. WHO. (2010). Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB).
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
16. Tbfacts.org. (2018). Multi Drug Resistant TB - What is MDR, statistics,
treatment. [online] Available at: https://www.tbfacts.org/multi-drug-
resistant-tb/ [Accessed 8 Nov. 2018].
17. Dodd, P., Sismanidis, C. and Seddon, J. (2018). Global burden of drug-
resistant tuberculosis in children: a mathematical modelling study.
18. Munita J M, Arias C A. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol
Spectr. 2016;4(2):10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015.
19. Bhunia S, Sarkar M, Banerjee A, Giri B. An update on pathogenesis and
management of tuberculosis with special reference to drug resistance.
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2015;5(9):673-686.
20. Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic
resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):417-33.
21. Millard J, Ugarte-Gil C, Moore D. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis. BMJ.
2015;350(feb26 10):h882-h882. doi:10.1136/bmj.h882
22. Raviglione M. Tuberculosis. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2010.
23. Dheda K, Gumbo T, Maartens G et al. The epidemiology, pathogenesis,
transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant,
extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. The Lancet
Respiratory Medicine. 2017;5(4):291-360. doi:10.1016/s2213-
2600(17)30079-6
24. Valafar F. Pathogenesis of multi drug-resistant and extensively drug-
resistant tuberculosis as a determinant of future treatment success. Int J
29
Mycobacteriol. 2016;5:S64-S65. doi:10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.11.017
25. Joon D, Nimesh N, Nimesh M. Clinical manifestations of tuberculosis.
Voyager. 2017 Jun;8(1):37-46.
26. Knechel NA. Tuberculosis: pathophysiology, clinical features, and
diagnosis. Critical Care Nurse. 2009 April;29(2):34-43.
27. Lee SH. Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Tuberc
Respir Dis (Seoul). 2015 Apr;78(2):56-63.
28. CDC. Basic tb facts: signs & symptoms [Online]. CDC; 2016 [updated
2016 Mar 17; cited 2018 Nov 6]. Available from:
https://www.cdc.gov/tb/topic/basics/signsandsymptoms.htm
29. Polena H, Boudou F, Tilleul S, Dubois-Colas N, Lecointe C,
Rakotosamimanana N, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exploits the
formation of new blood vessels for its dissemination. Sci Rep [Internet].
2016 Sep;6:33162. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616470 DOI: 10.1038/srep33162
30. Fontanilla JM, Barnes A, von Reyn CF. Current diagnosis and
management of peripheral tuberculous lymphadenitis. Clin Infect Dis
[Internet]. 2011 Sep;53(6):555-62. Availbable from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21865192 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir454
31. Peto HM, Pratt RH, Harrington TA, LoBue PA, Armstrong LR.
Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the united states, 1993-
2006. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2009 Nov;49(9):1350-7. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793000 DOI: 10.1086/605559
32. Micheletti VCD, Kritski AL, Braga JU. Clinical features and treatment
outcomes of patients with drug-resistant and drug-sensitive tuberculosis: a
historical cohort study in porto alegre, brazil. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016
Aug;11(8):e0160109. Available from: DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0160109
33. Gilpin C, Korobitsyn A, Weyer K. Current tools available for the
diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis [Internet]. 2016 [cited 4 November
2018]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375090/
30
34. Migliori GB, Matteelli A, Cirillo D. Diagnosis of mutrigrug-resistant
tuberculosis and extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis: Current standards
and challenges [Internet]. 2008 [cited 4 November 2018]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605858/
35. Seung KJ, Keshavjee S, Rich ML. Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis [Internet]. 2015 [cited 4
November 2018]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561400/
36. Kaijin W, Sheng B, Zhongkang J. Distinguishing Nontuberculous
Mycobacteria from Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis,
China [Internet]. 2014 [cited 4 November 2018]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4036753/
37. Chhabra N, Aseri ML, Dixit R, Gaur S. Pharmacotherapy for multidrug
resistant tuberculosis. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012;3(2).
doi:10.4103/0976-500X.95502.
38. Seung KJ, Keshavjee S, Rich ML. Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Cold
Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015.
39. WHO. Treatment of Tuberculosis Guidelines 4th Edition. 2009.
40. Elmi O, Hasan H, Abdullah S, Mat Jeab M, BA Z, Naing N. Treatment
Outcomes of Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR- TB)
Compared with Non-MDR-TB Infections in Peninsular Malaysia.
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;23(4):17-25.
41. Gadallah M, Mokhtar A, Rady M, El-Moghazy E, Fawzy M, Kandil S.
Prognostic factors of treatment among patients with multidrug-resistant
tuberculosis in Egypt. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.
2016;115(11):997-1003.
42. Oliveira O, Gaio R, Villar M, Duarte R. Predictors of treatment outcome
in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Portugal: Table 1–. European
Respiratory Journal. 2013;42(6):1747-1749.
43. Chung-Delgado K, Guillen-Bravo S, Revilla-Montag A, Bernabe-Ortiz A.
Mortality among MDR-TB Cases: Comparison with Drug-Susceptible
Tuberculosis and Associated Factors. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119332.
31
44. Keshavjee S, Farmer PE. 2012. Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the
history of modern medicine. New Engl J Med 367: 931–936.
45. Pomerantz BJ, Cleveland JC, Olson JK, Pomerantz M. 2001. Pulmonary
resection for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 121: 448–453.
46. Riyanto BS, Wilhan. 2006. Management of MDR TB Current and Future
dalam Buku Program dan Naskah Lengkap Konferensi Kerja Pertemuan
Ilmiah Berkala. PERPARI.
32