Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hydrology Report PKG-13
Hydrology Report PKG-13
Hydrology
Report
FEBRUARY - 2023
InceptionAN
NUAL
SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
In Association with
Upham International Corporation
1101A, XIth Floor, Tower A/2, Corporate Park, Plot No. 7A/1,
Sector-142, Noida-201301 (Uttar Pradesh)
Tel. No. 0120-6148000, 6148031, Fax No. 0120-6148092
info@sainfra.com
Table of Details of Submission
2
3
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3
1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3
1.2. General description of the site ................................................................................ 3
1.3. Data Used for the Hydrological Studies ................................................................... 4
1.3.1. Catchment Area Calculations ............................................................................... 4
1.3.2. Rainfall Data ......................................................................................................... 4
1.3.3. Survey Data .......................................................................................................... 6
1.3.4. Silt factor from Bore Hole Data ............................................................................ 6
2. METHODOLOGY FOR HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS........................................................ 7
2.1. Methodology Adopted For Discharge Computation ............................................... 7
2.1.1. Dicken’s method................................................................................................... 7
2.1.2. Ryve’s method ...................................................................................................... 7
2.1.3. Rational Formula .................................................................................................. 7
2.1.4. Synthetic unit hydrograph method ...................................................................... 8
2.1.5. Design Discharge for Bridges................................................................................ 9
2.1.6. Design HFL ............................................................................................................ 9
2.1.7. Recommended Waterway for Bridges ................................................................. 9
2.2. Scour Depth ........................................................................................................... 10
2.3. Afflux ...................................................................................................................... 10
2.3.1. AASHTO Formula ................................................................................................ 10
2.3.2. Molesworth equation......................................................................................... 10
3. PROPOSAL FOR BRIDGE ............................................................................................ 11
3.1. Proposal for Bridge ................................................................................................ 11
Annexures
Annexure A: Catchment area for bridges
Annexure B: Detailed hydrological calculations for bridges
2
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
Hydrological analysis of bridges is utmost important task in highway projects. Estimation of
design flood/discharge for the design of different types of hydraulic structures is a very
significant component of hydrological studies. Proper estimation of design flood value is of
great importance. While a higher value of design flood results in increase in the cost of the cross
drainage structures, an under estimated value is likely to place the structure at great risk. The
main objective of the hydrological and hydraulic study is to determine the required size of
drainage structures to allow the estimated design flow of the streams to cross the alignment
safely and to check whether waterways of existing structures are sufficient to transmit the flow
without risk so that appropriate decisions could be taken concerning their rehabilitation. The
hydrological and hydraulic study for the project has been based on:
Topographic survey data of cross drainage structures
Topographic data of streams, Upstream and downstream
Rainfall pattern of the project site
Site study of the characteristics of the catchment areas, HFL from local enquiries and marks,
Hydraulic conditions at the existing drainage structures.
The hydrological studies usually cover the following aspects:
Assessment of the catchment of streams crossing the project stretch and
Determination of discharge by various methods.
Safety of the proposed cross drainage structures/ Existing Structures in the event of extreme
flood i.e. estimation of design flood.
Determination of waterway required to pass the design flood safely.
Determination of Design HFL corresponding to the design flood.
1.2. General description of the site
The project road is located in Purulia district in the state of West Bengal. The Key Map of
project location is shown in Figure: 1.1.
3
Fig. 1.1: Key Plan of the Project Road
Most of the alignment is proposed as green alignment. The project stretch is passing through
the agricultural land and Barren land.
1.3. Data Used for the Hydrological Studies
1.3.1. Catchment Area Calculations
The maps through Bhuvan mapping and catchment area through google earth remote sensing
images and toposheets of scale 1:50,000 have been used to calculate catchment area for the
streams. These maps are studied to find out catchment area, contours, terrain slope, land use
and cover conditions, stream flow, etc. The catchment for all the river crossings on the
proposed road has been demarcated and analysed to calculate the runoff from different
methods. The catchment area of bridges is enclosed as Annexure A.
1.3.2. Rainfall Data
India is divided into 26 hydro meteorologically homogenous sub zones. The corridor of the
proposed project – package‐13 is in Lower Ganga Plains Subzone 1(g). For assessing design
discharge of any given return period (100yrs. for bridges), input rainfalls for the design return
period are found. These data are taken from the isopluvial maps published in the flood
estimation report of Central Water Condition (CWC) for subzone 1(g), published jointly by CWC,
IMD, RDSO, and MoRT&H. The rainfall depth values used for the project are given in the table
below;
4
Table 1.3.2‐1: Rainfall Depth along Project Road
Location 24 Hours Rainfall 24 Hours Rainfall (mm)
(mm) for the for the Return Period
Return Period of 50 of 100 Years
Years
Ramgarh 280 320
Bokaro 240 300
Source : Central Water Commission Flood Estimation Report for Lower Ganga Plains
subzone 1(g)
The 100 year discharge data has been taken from Lower Ganga Plains subzone 1(g) as shown in
Figure 1 which is Plate 10 of the report.
Figure 1: 100 year 24 hour rainfall for subzone 1(g)
5
1.3.3. Survey Data
The longitudinal section of the river extending to about 100m to 500m both on the U/S D/S side
is drawn on the basis of actual survey data received from site. Longitudinal section of the
stream along deep channel is plotted for the stream to determine the longitudinal bed slope.
Cross‐sections of the streams are also plotted across the stream up to 100 to 500m on u/s and
d/s side. Manning’s roughness coefficient (n), cross‐section area of flow (A), wetted perimeter
(P) and conveyance (K) etc. are found for the stream. Design High Flood Level is assessed on the
basis of the design flood.
1.3.4. Silt factor from Bore Hole Data
For the calculation of normal scour depth, Lacey has introduced one formula which is based
upon the silt factor (Ksf). The value of Ksf depends upon the size and looseness of the grains of
the alluvium. Ksf is assumed to be 1.0 for hydrological calculation purposes.
6
2. METHODOLOGY FOR HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS
2.1. Methodology Adopted For Discharge Computation
Discharge is generally computed by using various methods (i.e. Empirical Formula, modified
Rational method, CWC method, Slope Area method), as recommended in IRC:SP:13‐2004 and
IRC:5‐2014 are briefed below. Methods adopted in any particular case may vary depending on
availability of data and site conditions.
2.1.1. Dicken’s method
Dicken’s formula is commonly used for computation of flood discharge based on catchment area
of the stream.
Q = CA0.75
Where:
A = Catchment area in Sq. km.
C = Run‐off coefficient which depends on the topography, annual rainfall, type of soil,
vegetation, ground slope, climate of the region, etc.
2.1.2. Ryve’s method
Ryve’s formula is commonly used for computation of flood discharge based on catchment area
of the stream.
Q = CM 2/3
Where:
M = Catchment area in Sq. km.
C = 6.8 for areas within 25 km of the coast
= 8.5 for areas between 25 km and 160 km of the coast
= 1 0.0 for limited areas near the hills
2.1.3. Rational Formula
Q= 0.028 PfAIC
Where:
Q = Maximum runoff in cumecs
A = Catchment area in hectares
Ic = Critical intensity of rainfall in cm/ hr.
P = Coefficient of run‐off for the given catchment characteristics.
F = Spread factor for converting point rainfall into area mean rainfall.
Ic = (F/T)*(T+1) / (Tc+1)
F = Total Rainfall of T hours duration (24 hrs.) in cm corresponding to 100 yrs return
period.
7
T = Duration of total rainfall (F) in hours= 24 hrs.
Tc= Time of concentration in hour.
Ic values found from Inglis formula (as per IRC: SP‐13) gives extremely high intensity of rainfall
when 24 hrs rainfall is considered. Design rainfall intensity Ic is therefore computed from
rainfall distribution given in CWC’s flood estimation report corresponding to 100 years return
period for bridges for storms of duration equal to time of concentration. Concentration time Tc
is found for every catchment for the given stream from respective toposheets assuming some
tortuosity and also from Dicken’s and Time of Travel formulas as given below. Average of the
two values is taken for finding Tc and corresponding Ic. Total rainfall in 24 hrs is adjusted
corresponding to Tc for finding critical rainfall intensity Ic from the rainfall distribution curve
(Duration vs conversion ratio) of CWC report.
Time of concentration
Times of concentrations (Tc) are to be determined on the basis of stream lengths (Lc) and shape
of catchment as well as from terrain slope and cover conditions from the toposheets as well as
hydrological survey data of stream. The values are to be found both by Dicken’s (empirical)
formulae as well as from time of travel from farthest point of catchment as follows:
Dicken’s formula
Tc = [0.87(L3/H)] 0.385
Where L is the length of catchment in km and H is the elevation difference in meter in length L.
Time of Travel
Tc=(Lc/Vc)+(B/(2*VB))
Lc is the main channel length and B is the average width of catchment contributing flow to the
main channel. Vc is the mean velocity of flow along the main channel and the VB is the mean
velocity of the flow from areas contributing flow to the main channel. Average value of Tc is to
be taken as the concentration time. Point rainfall values are to be adjusted for areal mean value
using spread factors as per IRC: SP‐13 and CWC report.
2.1.4. Synthetic unit hydrograph method
Synthetic unit hydrograph method is based on generation of flood hydrograph through certain
equations certified by CWC department through CWC flood estimation report based on subzone
of Lower Ganga Plains ‐ subzone 1(g).
The following steps shall be taken for calculations of discharge:
1. Preparation of catchment area plan.
2. Determination of physiographic parameters: The physiographic parameters determined
from the catchment area plan are : Catchment Area, length of the longest stream and
equivalent stream slope. The stream slope can be calculated by graphical method and by
mathematical method.
3. Determination of 1hr unitgraph parameters with the known values of A, L and s. The
equations are as follows:
8
qp = 2.0972/[tp]^(0.927)
tp = 1.1808*[L*Lc/ √S]^(0.285)
W50 = 1.2622*[tp]^(0.828)
W75 = 0.7896*[tp]^(0.711)
WR50 = 0.5357*[tp]^(0.745)
WR75 = 0.3825*[tp]^(‐0.647)
TB = 5.583*[(tp)^(0.824)]
Tm = tp + tr/2
Qp = qp x A
4. Drawing of a synthetic unit graph
5. Estimation of design storm duration
6. Estimation of point rainfall and areal rainfall
7. Time distribution of areal rainfall
8. Estimation of effective rainfall unit
9. Estimation of 100 year flood
10. Computation of design flood hydrograph
The flood hydrograph is generated and design loss rate and base flow are added to the main
flow. A design loss rate of 0.27cm/h is considered and base flow of 0.04cumec/ sq km of
catchment area have been used as per CWC flood estimation report.
2.1.5. Design Discharge for Bridges
The discharge is computed by various methods (discussed above) and then finally the design
discharge is fixed based on provision given in IRC: SP‐13 and IRC 5.
When the variation between the highest two values of discharges computed by different
methods is less than 50%, the highest discharge has been taken as design discharge.
2.1.6. Design HFL
The project alignment is a green alignment. To accommodate the design discharge or in other
words to facilitate design flood to pass through the proposed waterway, the normal flood level
has been built up corresponding to design discharge using stage discharge curve and then
design HFL is computed by adding afflux to the normal flood level. The afflux is calculated for
the constricted waterway or in other words for the proposed waterway of the bridge.
2.1.7. Recommended Waterway for Bridges
Although IRC 5 ‐ 2014 recommends Lacey’s regime waterway as clear waterway under bridges.
Based on the width of the banks for the confined streams and water spread at HFL and Lacey’s
waterway, waterway for the bridges shall be recommended. Lower of the two (Lacey’s regime
waterway and normal waterway) shall be considered to estimate clear waterway keeping a
maximum restriction up to 40 per cent (i.e. a fluming ratio of 60%) as recommended by IRC.
9
2.2. Scour Depth
Lacey’s equation is used for estimating normal scour depth as per IRC: 5
R = 1.34 (q2/Ksf) 1/3
Where R is the Lacey’s regime scour depth, measured below HFL, q is the design discharge
intensity under bridge in cumecs per meter and Ksf is silt factor given by the equation
Ksf= 1.0 (assumed for worst condition)
Normal scour depth based on Lacey’s equation and the actual observed depth. Higher of the
two values is adopted for design. Maximum scour level for pier and abutment will be calculated
using a factor of safety of 2 and 1.27, respectively as per IRC: Code‐5. For computing scour
depth, design discharge is to be enhanced by 30% to provide for adequate margin of safety as
per provision of IRC: 78 ‐ 2000.
2.3. Afflux
Afflux is the difference in water surface elevation at any point u/s of the bridge before and after
the construction of bridge for a given flow. Afflux occurs just upstream of the bridge and it
reduces to zero at a point where normal HFL meets new HFL due to constriction of waterway.
Afflux can be estimated by using several empirical equations. IRC:SP‐13 recommends use of
weir/orifice formula for computing flow with known afflux or vice versa. This method has
already been discussed above. Other methods which are used to calculate afflux are given
below:
2.3.1. AASHTO Formula
For shallow channels with wide flood planes, afflux can be obtained from the following
expression. (Bradley 1970)
H1* = 3(1‐M) Vn22 /2g
Where,
M = Qb/Q, Qb is that portion of the total discharge Q in the approach channel within a width
equal to the projected length of the bridge
Vn2 = Q/An2
An2 is the gross area of waterway under the bridge opening below normal stream depth
corresponding to design discharge.
2.3.2. Molesworth equation
IRC 5 and IRC 89 recommend use of Molesworth equation
H1* = [V2/17.88 +0.015] [(A/A1)+2‐1]
Where V = Mean velocity of flow prior to bridge construction.
A and A1 are areas of flow section at normal HFL in approach river section and under the bridge
respectively.
10
3. PROPOSAL FOR BRIDGE
3.1. Proposal for Bridge
As discussed above the hydrological analysis has been done for all the rivers crossings and pond
locations along the proposed road. The water way of the cross‐drainage structures have been
worked out based upon the design flood and survey data. The details of proposals for bridges
are as mentioned in Annexure B.
11
Proposal of Bridges
Discharge Proposed
Name of
Bridge Design for Linear
S. No. stream or Design HFL Velocity LBL Soffit Level
Ch. Discharge foundation Waterway/
canal
design total span
15 383+650 Local Nala 8.188 10.644 328.662 0.446 327.941 10.0 329.262
Discharge Proposed
Name of
Bridge Design for Linear
S. No. stream or Design HFL Velocity LBL Soffit Level
Ch. Discharge foundation Waterway/
canal
design total span
2
Annexure A: Catchment area for bridges
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 328+100
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 333+650
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 333+940
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 334+250
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 334+480
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 334+780
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 338+100
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 338+360
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 338+960
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 343+370
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 345+800
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 346+780
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 347+460
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 347+870
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 349+330
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 349+840
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 350+200
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 351+480
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 353+060
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 354+825
CATCHMENT AREA OF BRIDGE AT CHAINAGE 355+400
Annexure B: Detailed hydrological
calculations for bridges
Proposed Chainage = 358+980
Catchment Area = 18.03 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 40 m
Lacey's waterway = 53.97661 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 164.3888 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 40 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 3.438 m
LBL (m) = 349.040 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 3.508 m
R (Adopted) = 3.438 m
Maximum scour under pier = 6.876 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 4.366 m
HFL (m) = 352.548 m
MSL for pier (m) = 345.671 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 348.181 m
Froude's no = 0.300
Waterway considered = 44.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.909
Proposed Chainage 358+980
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 18.03 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 141.80 mm
y = -0.0041x + 349.03
R² = 0.6431
349
RL
348
347
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 79.87 m Q design 139.113
Wetted Perimeter, P = 43.7 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 1.828 m v= 1.741723539 m/s
AR2/3 = 119.67
352.0
351.0
350.0
349.0
348.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 126.45 cumecs
Effective Span = 40.00 m
Actual Waterway = 44.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.10 Average Afflux = 0.01 m
Regime depth = 3.50 m
vn1 = 0.24 m/s Normal Flood Level = 352.54 m
vn2 = 0.90 m/s
Design HFL = 352.548 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.00 m
h1* = 0.01
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
29.216 349.040 352.548
351.0
38.124 351.050 352.548
49.667 352.250 352.548 350.0
63.462 352.410 352.548
349.0
348.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 359+800
Catchment Area = 4.441 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 25 m
Lacey's waterway = 34.49889 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 67.15389 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 25 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 2.589 m
LBL (m) = 358.564 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.065 m
R (Adopted) = 2.589 m
Maximum scour under pier = 5.179 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 3.288 m
HFL (m) = 359.629 m
MSL for pier (m) = 354.450 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 356.340 m
Froude's no = 0.319
Waterway considered = 39.42 m
Fluming ratio = 0.634
Proposed Chainage 359+800
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 4.44 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 120.24 mm
ADOPTED SLOPE = 1 in 55
360
y = 0.0223x + 358.23
R² = 0.9243
RL
359
358
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 35.72 m Q design 57.465
Wetted Perimeter, P = 60.0 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.595 m v= 1.608765709 m/s
AR2/3 = 25.22
361.0
360.0
R.L.(m)
359.0
358.0
357.0
359740 359760 359780 359800 359820 359840 359860
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 51.66 cumecs
Effective Span = 25.00 m
Actual Waterway = 39.42 m
W / L Ratio = 1.58 Average Afflux = 0.16 m
Regime depth = 0.90 m
vn1 = 0.38 m/s Normal Flood Level = 359.464 m
vn2 = 2.30 m/s
Design HFL = 359.629 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.29
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
359840 358.939 359.629
359860 359.289 359.629
359.0
358.0
357.0
359740 359760 359780 359800 359820 359840 359860
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 360+240
Catchment Area = 9.436 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 35 m
Lacey's waterway = 42.73984 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 103.0687 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 35 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 2.753 m
LBL (m) = 360.030 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.262 m
R (Adopted) = 2.753 m
Maximum scour under pier = 5.506 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 3.496 m
HFL (m) = 361.292 m
MSL for pier (m) = 355.786 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 357.796 m
Froude's no = 0.419
Waterway considered = 60.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.583
Proposed Chainage 360+240
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 9.44 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 128.21 mm
361
360
RL
359
y = 0.0173x + 358.57
R² = 0.8827
358
357
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 37.98 m Q design 82.636
Wetted Perimeter, P = 51.0 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.745 m V= 2.175653024 m/s
AR2/3 = 31.18
363.0
362.0
R.L.(m)
361.0
360.0
359.0
358.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 79.28 cumecs
Effective Span = 35.00 m
Actual Waterway = 60.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.71 Average Afflux = 0.16 m
Regime depth = 1.10 m
vn1 = 0.48 m/s Normal Flood Level = 361.13 m
vn2 = 2.06 m/s
Design HFL = 361.292 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.05 m
h1* = 0.27
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
45.374 360.700 361.292
53.489 360.030 361.292 360.0
65.393 361.320 361.292
77.090 361.010 361.292 359.0
358.0
0 20 40 60 80
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 363+465
Catchment Area = 1.672 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 15 m
Lacey's waterway = 21.58272 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 26.2829 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 15 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.948 m
LBL (m) = 388.350 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.733 m
R (Adopted) = 1.948 m
Maximum scour under pier = 3.895 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 2.473 m
HFL (m) = 390.083 m
MSL for pier (m) = 386.188 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 387.609 m
Froude's no = 0.209
Waterway considered = 25.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.600
Proposed Chainage 363+465
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 1.67 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 102.32 mm
ADOPTED SLOPE = 1 in 49
388
y = -0.0201x + 388.15
R² = 0.8812
387
RL
386
385
384
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 30.22 m Q design 27.652
Wetted Perimeter, P = 25.9 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 1.169 m v= 0.914929219 m/s
AR2/3 = 33.56
392.0
391.0
R.L.(m)
390.0
389.0
388.0
387.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 20.22 cumecs
Effective Span = 15.00 m
Actual Waterway = 25.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.67 Average Afflux = 0.03 m
Regime depth = 1.70 m
vn1 = 0.08 m/s Normal Flood Level = 390.05 m
vn2 = 0.79 m/s
Design HFL = 390.083 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.04
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
32.742 388.490 390.083
36.924 389.450 390.083
389.0
52.162 390.820 390.083
62.891 390.580 390.083
388.0
387.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 364+620
Catchment Area = 1.129 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 15 m
Lacey's waterway = 18.62742 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 19.57792 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 15 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.600 m
LBL (m) = 388.160 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.429 m
R (Adopted) = 1.600 m
Maximum scour under pier = 3.201 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 2.032 m
HFL (m) = 389.589 m
MSL for pier (m) = 386.389 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 387.557 m
Froude's no = 0.459
Waterway considered = 25.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.600
Proposed Chainage 364+620
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 1.13 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 36.32 mm
386
y = -0.0078x + 386.68
R² = 0.8364
RL
385
384
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 25.36 m Q design 46.104
Wetted Perimeter, P = 26.7 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.951 m v= 1.818322983 m/s
AR2/3 = 24.51
391.0
390.0
R.L.(m)
389.0
388.0
387.0
386.0
385.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 15.06 cumecs
Effective Span = 15.00 m
Actual Waterway = 25.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.67 Average Afflux = 0.03 m
Regime depth = 1.40 m
vn1 = 0.07 m/s Normal Flood Level = 389.56 m
vn2 = 0.72 m/s
Design HFL = 389.589 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.03
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
37.440 388.350 389.589 389.0
44.454 388.480 389.589 388.0
46.000 391.000 389.589
387.0
66.556 391.000 389.589
386.0
385.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 366+120
Catchment Area = 0.452 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 10 m
Lacey's waterway = 13.21507 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 9.853712 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 10 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.327 m
LBL (m) = 383.751 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.794 m
R (Adopted) = 1.327 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.654 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.685 m
HFL (m) = 384.545 m
MSL for pier (m) = 381.891 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 382.860 m
Froude's no = 0.238
Waterway considered = 25.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.400
Proposed Chainage 366+120
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.45 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 20.10 mm
386
RL
385
384
y = -0.0067x + 384.17
0 10 20 30 40 R² = 50
0.8995 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 14.00 m Q design 12.031
Wetted Perimeter, P = 40.0 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.350 m v= 0.859375328 m/s
AR2/3 = 6.93
388.0
387.0
R.L.(m)
386.0
385.0
384.0
383.0
366040 366060 366080 366100 366120 366140 366160 366180 366200
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 7.58 cumecs
Effective Span = 10.00 m
Actual Waterway = 25.00 m
W / L Ratio = 2.50 Average Afflux = 0.09 m
Regime depth = 0.70 m
vn1 = 0.07 m/s Normal Flood Level = 384.451 m
vn2 = 1.08 m/s
Design HFL = 384.545 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.08 m
h1* = 0.11
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
366140 383.801 384.545 386.0
366160 384.598 384.545 HFL = 384.545m
385.0
366180 386.221 384.545
366200 387.569 384.545 384.0
383.0
366040 366060 366080 366100 366120 366140 366160 366180 366200
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 369+020
Catchment Area = 79.92681 Km2
River Name = Khanjo River
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 70 m
Lacey's waterway = 102.7492 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 595.6866 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 70 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 5.585 m
LBL (m) = 363.490 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 3.272 m
R (Adopted) = 5.585 m
Maximum scour under pier = 11.171 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 7.093 m
HFL (m) = 366.762 m
MSL for pier (m) = 355.591 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 359.669 m
Froude's no = 0.415
Waterway considered = 85.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.824
Proposed Chainage 369+020
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 79.93 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 172.18 mm
y = -0.0053x + 363.27
R² = 0.6896
363
RL
362
361
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 157.59 m Q design 484.440
Wetted Perimeter, P = 72.1 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 2.187 m v= 3.074076005 m/s
AR2/3 = 266.17
366.0
365.0
364.0
363.0
362.0
361.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 458.22 cumecs
Effective Span = 70.00 m
Actual Waterway = 85.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.21 Average Afflux = 0.07 m
Regime depth = 3.20 m
vn1 = 0.95 m/s Normal Flood Level = 366.69 m
vn2 = 2.05 m/s
Design HFL = 366.762 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.11
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
94.001 367.030 366.762 366.0
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 15 m
Lacey's waterway = 21.47279 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 26.01583 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 15 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.934 m
LBL (m) = 379.770 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.737 m
R (Adopted) = 1.934 m
Maximum scour under pier = 3.869 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 2.457 m
HFL (m) = 380.507 m
MSL for pier (m) = 376.639 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 378.051 m
Froude's no = 0.450
Waterway considered = 20.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.750
Proposed Chainage 370+920
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 1.55 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 75.38 mm
378
RL
y = -0.0097x + 378.51
377
R² = 0.4572
376
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 11.45 m Q design 22.472
Wetted Perimeter, P = 22.1 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.517 m v= 1.96220692 m/s
AR2/3 = 7.36
382.0
381.0
R.L.(m)
380.0
379.0
378.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 20.01 cumecs
Effective Span = 15.00 m
Actual Waterway = 20.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.33 Average Afflux = 0.09 m
Regime depth = 0.65 m
vn1 = 0.21 m/s Normal Flood Level = 380.42 m
vn2 = 2.05 m/s
Design HFL = 380.507 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.01 m
h1* = 0.16
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
67.128 381.200 380.507 380.0
82.134 382.710 380.507
379.0
378.0
377.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 374+250
Catchment Area = 0.477177 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 10 m
Lacey's waterway = 13.48644 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 10.26256 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 10 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.363 m
LBL (m) = 374.492 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.600 m
R (Adopted) = 1.363 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.727 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.731 m
HFL (m) = 375.092 m
MSL for pier (m) = 372.365 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 373.361 m
Froude's no = 0.213
Waterway considered = 10.00 m
Fluming ratio = 1.000
Proposed Chainage 374+250
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.48 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 33.35 mm
ADOPTED SLOPE = 1 in 98
y = -0.0089x + 375.42
R² = 0.6617
375
RL
374
373
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 12.38 m Q design 9.649
Wetted Perimeter, P = 60.0 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.206 m v= 0.779380843 m/s
AR2/3 = 4.30
379.0
378.0
R.L.(m)
377.0
376.0
375.0
374.0
373.0
374180 374200 374220 374240 374260 374280 374300 374320 374340
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 7.89 cumecs
Effective Span = 10.00 m
Actual Waterway = 10.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.00 Average Afflux = 0.00 m
Regime depth = 0.60 m
vn1 = 0.09 m/s Normal Flood Level = 375.092 m
vn2 = 1.32 m/s
Design HFL = 375.092 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.00 m
h1* = 0.00
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
374280 374.247 375.092 377.0
374300 373.619 375.092
HFL = 375.110m
374320 373.927 375.092
374340 374.727 375.092 375.0
373.0
374180 374200 374220 374240 374260 374280 374300 374320 374340
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 376+415
Catchment Area = 0.157 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 6m
Lacey's waterway = 8.889042 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 4.458315 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 6 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.099 m
LBL (m) = 355.259 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.641 m
R (Adopted) = 1.099 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.199 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.396 m
HFL (m) = 355.900 m
MSL for pier (m) = 353.702 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 354.504 m
Froude's no = 0.288
Waterway considered = 10.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.600
Proposed Chainage 376+415
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.16 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 14.37 mm
ADOPTED SLOPE = 1 in 73
356
y = -0.0186x + 355.66
R² = 0.8279
355
RL
354
353
352
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 12.00 m Q design 11.367
Wetted Perimeter, P = 40.0 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 0.300 m v= 0.947215842 m/s
AR2/3 = 5.35
360.0
359.0
R.L.(m)
358.0
357.0
356.0
355.0
376360 376380 376400 376420 376440 376460 376480
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 3.43 cumecs
Effective Span = 6.00 m
Actual Waterway = 10.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.67 Average Afflux = 0.04 m
Regime depth = 0.60 m
vn1 = 0.04 m/s Normal Flood Level = 355.859 m
vn2 = 0.95 m/s
Design HFL = 355.900 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.06
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
376460 357.000 355.900
376480 357.000 355.900
356.0
355.0
354.0
376360 376380 376400 376420 376440 376460 376480
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 377+240
Catchment Area = 7.194 Km2
River Name = Local nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 27 m
Lacey's waterway = 39.18637 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 86.6425 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 27 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 2.915 m
LBL (m) = 324.521 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.554 m
R (Adopted) = 2.915 m
Maximum scour under pier = 5.831 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 3.702 m
HFL (m) = 326.075 m
MSL for pier (m) = 320.245 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 322.373 m
Froude's no = 0.256
Waterway considered = 35.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.771
Proposed Chainage 377+240
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 7.19 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 122.68 mm
323
322
y = -0.0047x + 322.87
RL
R² = 0.0713
321
320
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
327.0
326.0
R.L.(m)
325.0
324.0
323.0
322.0
321.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 66.65 cumecs
Effective Span = 27.00 m
Actual Waterway = 35.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.30 Average Afflux = 0.05 m
Regime depth = 1.50 m
vn1 = 0.30 m/s Normal Flood Level = 326.021 m
vn2 = 1.65 m/s
Design HFL = 326.075 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.01 m
h1* = 0.09
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
325.0
59.042 324.857 326.075
65.034 324.662 326.075 324.0
75.562 324.521 326.075
323.0
87.069 324.890 326.075
100.764 326.620 326.075 322.0
321.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 378+200
Catchment Area = 25.531 Km2
River Name = Ijri nadi
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 50 m
Lacey's waterway = 59.98505 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 203.0238 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 50 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 3.411 m
LBL (m) = 311.360 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 2.166 m
R (Adopted) = 3.411 m
Maximum scour under pier = 6.821 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 4.331 m
HFL (m) = 313.526 m
MSL for pier (m) = 306.705 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 309.194 m
Froude's no = 0.495
Waterway considered = 71.50 m
Fluming ratio = 0.699
Proposed Chainage 378+200
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 25.53 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 160.02 mm
ADOPTED SLOPE = 1 in 69
y = -0.0144x + 311.17
R² = 0.9487
311
310
RL
309
308
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Chainage (m)
Determination of Flow Depth at Bridge Site
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 62.78 m Q design 179.779
Wetted Perimeter, P = 56.5 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 1.112 m v= 2.863512209 m/s
2/3
AR = 67.42
317.0
R.L.(m)
315.0
313.0
311.0
309.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 156.17 cumecs
Effective Span = 50.00 m
Actual Waterway = 71.50 m
W / L Ratio = 1.43 Average Afflux = 0.07 m
Regime depth = 2.10 m
vn1 = 0.50 m/s Normal Flood Level = 313.46 m
vn2 = 1.49 m/s
Design HFL = 313.526 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.03 m
h1* = 0.10
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
58.164 311.820 313.526
61.556 311.360 313.526 HFL = 313.526m
314.0
72.185 311.450 313.526
84.483 313.150 313.526 312.0
97.666 316.380 313.526
112.042 315.630 313.526 310.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 380+610
Catchment Area = 1.015 Km2
River Name = Local Nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 12 m
Lacey's waterway = 17.89853 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 18.07572 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 12 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.761 m
LBL (m) = 330.015 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 1.203 m
R (Adopted) = 1.761 m
Maximum scour under pier = 3.522 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 2.236 m
HFL (m) = 331.218 m
MSL for pier (m) = 327.696 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 328.982 m
Froude's no = 0.136
Waterway considered = 67.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.179
Proposed Chainage 380+610
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 1.02 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 54.41 mm
334.0
333.0
R.L.(m)
332.0
331.0
330.0
329.0
328.0
380560 380570 380580 380590 380600 380610 380620 380630 380640 380650 380660
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 13.90 cumecs
Effective Span = 12.00 m
Actual Waterway = 67.00 m
W / L Ratio = 5.58 Average Afflux = 0.35 m
Regime depth = 0.85 m
vn1 = 0.11 m/s Normal Flood Level = 330.865 m
vn2 = 1.36 m/s
Design HFL = 331.218 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.47 m
h1* = 0.23
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
380660 334.000 331.218
HFL = 331.218m
331.0
329.0
380560 380580 380600 380620 380640 380660
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 381+700
Catchment Area = 0.502 Km2
River Name = Local Nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 10 m
Lacey's waterway = 13.74537 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 10.66041 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 10 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.398 m
LBL (m) = 337.012 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.721 m
R (Adopted) = 1.398 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.797 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.776 m
HFL (m) = 337.733 m
MSL for pier (m) = 334.936 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 335.957 m
Froude's no = 0.140
Waterway considered = 12.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.833
Proposed Chainage 381+700
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.50 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 24.48 mm
341.0
340.0
R.L.(m)
339.0
338.0
337.0
336.0
381640 381650 381660 381670 381680 381690 381700 381710 381720 381730 381740
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 8.20 cumecs
Effective Span = 10.00 m
Actual Waterway = 12.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.20 Average Afflux = 0.02 m
Regime depth = 0.70 m
vn1 = 0.08 m/s Normal Flood Level = 337.712 m
vn2 = 1.17 m/s
Design HFL = 337.733 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.01 m
h1* = 0.03
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
381740 337.630 337.733
337.0
336.0
381640 381660 381680 381700 381720 381740
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 383+650
Catchment Area = 0.501 Km2
River Name = Local Nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 10 m
Lacey's waterway = 13.7351 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 10.64448 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 10 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.397 m
LBL (m) = 327.941 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.721 m
R (Adopted) = 1.397 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.794 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.774 m
HFL (m) = 328.662 m
MSL for pier (m) = 325.868 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 326.888 m
Froude's no = 0.121
Waterway considered = 12.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.833
Proposed Chainage 383+650
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.50 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 24.04 mm
331.0
330.0
R.L.(m)
329.0
328.0
327.0
326.0
383600 383610 383620 383630 383640 383650 383660 383670 383680 383690 383700
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 8.19 cumecs
Effective Span = 10.00 m
Actual Waterway = 12.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.20 Average Afflux = 0.02 m
Regime depth = 0.70 m
vn1 = 0.08 m/s Normal Flood Level = 328.641 m
vn2 = 1.17 m/s
Design HFL = 328.662 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.01 m
h1* = 0.03
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
383700 330.310 328.662
328.0
327.0
326.0
383600 383620 383640 383660 383680 383700
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 384+550
Catchment Area = 60.526 Km2
River Name = Gobai river
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 60 m
Lacey's waterway = 82.3533 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 382.6686 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 60 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 4.608 m
LBL (m) = 319.236 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 2.151 m
R (Adopted) = 4.608 m
Maximum scour under pier = 9.217 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 5.853 m
HFL (m) = 321.387 m
MSL for pier (m) = 312.171 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 315.535 m
Froude's no = 0.310
Waterway considered = 67.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.896
Proposed Chainage 384+550
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 60.53 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 246.93 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 152.64 m Q design 318.033
Wetted Perimeter, P = 100.2 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 1.524 m v= 2.083551846 m/s
AR2/3 = 202.40
323.0
R.L.(m)
321.0
319.0
317.0
384460 384470 384480 384490 384500 384510 384520 384530 384540 384550 384560 384570 384580 384590 384600 384610 384620
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 294.36 cumecs
Effective Span = 60.00 m
Actual Waterway = 67.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.12 Average Afflux = 0.05 m
Regime depth = 2.10 m
vn1 = 0.93 m/s Normal Flood Level = 321.336 m
vn2 = 2.34 m/s
Design HFL = 321.387 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.02 m
h1* = 0.09
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
321.0
384560 320.245 321.387
384580 320.290 321.387 320.0
384600 320.646 321.387
319.0
384620 320.379 321.387
318.0
317.0
384460 384480 384500 384520 384540 384560 384580 384600 384620
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 385+780
Catchment Area = 0.512 Km2
River Name = Local Nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 10 m
Lacey's waterway = 13.84742 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 10.81928 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 10 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 1.412 m
LBL (m) = 321.164 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 0.914 m
R (Adopted) = 1.412 m
Maximum scour under pier = 2.824 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 1.794 m
HFL (m) = 322.078 m
MSL for pier (m) = 319.254 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 320.285 m
Froude's no = 0.156
Waterway considered = 12.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.833
Proposed Chainage 385+780
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 0.51 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 28.70 mm
325.0
324.0
R.L.(m)
323.0
322.0
321.0
320.0
385720 385730 385740 385750 385760 385770 385780 385790 385800 385810 385820
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 8.32 cumecs
Effective Span = 10.00 m
Actual Waterway = 12.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.20 Average Afflux = 0.01 m
Regime depth = 0.90 m
vn1 = 0.06 m/s Normal Flood Level = 322.064 m
vn2 = 0.92 m/s
Design HFL = 322.078 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.01 m
h1* = 0.02
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
385820 324.000 322.078
322.0
320.0
385720 385740 385760 385780 385800 385820
Chainage (m)
Proposed Chainage = 387+060
Catchment Area = 25.30472 Km2
River Name = Local Nala
Waterway
Clear waterway provided = 40 m
Lacey's waterway = 59.78513 m
Scour Calculation
Q for scour = 201.6727 cumec
Silt Factor (Assumed) = 1
Clear waterway = 40 m
Normal scour (m below HFL) = 3.940 m
LBL (m) = 310.198 m
Depth from (HFL-LBL) = 2.320 m
R (Adopted) = 3.940 m
Maximum scour under pier = 7.880 m
Maximum scour under abutment = 5.004 m
HFL (m) = 312.518 m
MSL for pier (m) = 304.638 m
MSL for abutment (m) = 307.515 m
Froude's no = 0.212
Waterway considered = 67.00 m
Fluming ratio = 0.597
Proposed Chainage 387+060
2) By Ryve's Method
2/3
Q = CM Cumecs
Area of catchment, M = 25.30 Km2
Coefficent, C = 8.5
3) By Rational Method
tc hr rainfall = 203.20 mm
2
Cross Sectional Area, A = 121.96 m Q design 160.505
Wetted Perimeter, P = 80.2 m
Hydraulic radius, R = 1.521 m v= 1.316043768 m/s
2/3
AR = 161.50
317.0
R.L.(m)
315.0
313.0
311.0
309.0
386980 387000 387020 387040 387060 387080 387100 387120 387140 387160 387180
Chainage(m)
Calculation of Afflux by different methods
Design Discharge = 155.13 cumecs
Effective Span = 40.00 m
Actual Waterway = 67.00 m
W / L Ratio = 1.68 Average Afflux = 0.12 m
Regime depth = 2.20 m
vn1 = 0.47 m/s Normal Flood Level = 312.398 m
vn2 = 1.76 m/s
Design HFL = 312.518 m
2
1) Molesworth Eqn : (vn /17.88 + 0.015)*((A/A1)2 - 1)
h1* = 0.05 m
h1* = 0.19
Normal Crossection at Bridge Site
R.L. (m)
387080 310.198 312.518 HFL = 312.518m
313.0
387100 311.148 312.518
387120 312.331 312.518 312.0
387140 313.493 312.518
311.0
387160 313.925 312.518
387180 314.000 312.518 310.0
386980 387020 387060 387100 387140 387180
Chainage (m)