Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACYFAR 1 - Unit 1 - Standard Setting
ACYFAR 1 - Unit 1 - Standard Setting
Standard Setting
➢ Tells companies on what to disclose by telling them the basic information used might need (like brochures)
➢ Enables us to compare one company from another
○ Being able to compare companies helps an investor or creditor on which company to better decide to invest
in or provide loans to
➢ Pag walang guide, hirap mag compare kasi iba iba dinididisclose ng mga companies
Accounting
➢ A service activity whose function is to provide information, primarily financial in nature, about economic
entities that is intended to be useful in making economic decisions (-AICPA or American Institute of Certified
Public Accountant)
➢ The process of identifying, measuring and communicating economic information to permit informed
judgments and decisions by users of the information (-AAA or American Accounting Association)
Accounting Scandal
➔ is a major factor that pushes the need for single set of standard
Three Results in this Study
★ Scandals came first before regulations, which means regulators are more reactive than proactive probably
they are less informed than companies because companies have the first hand experience
★ Regulators are not full effective because there has to be rules first in order to identify corporate scandalous
actions, and because new regulations may have loopholes which is unforeseen by regulators when they
publish
★ How the effectiveness of these regulations vary from country to country, since not all countries have efficient
legal system
Globalization
➔ is also a major factor.
★ Example: You are a company biz in the Philippines and you want to expand abroad. If we had multiple
standards, then iba iba laman ng financial statements mo bawat country although you are a single entity. Iba
iba din ung annual reports na kailangan mong isubmit sa government bawat country.
★ Also pushes for
○ consistency in application and interpretation
○ common disclosures
○ common delivery system
○ Common approach to regulator’s review and enforcement
○ Education and training of marketing participants
2. Standard-Setting Bodies
➢ Professional organizations which produce technical standards for financial reporting
➢ Organizations in charge of promulgating guidelines on financial reporting
Timeline
2001
- IASC was reorganized and renamed into International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
- IASB was in charge was in charge of promulgating the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
- International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) is in charge of interpreting the IFRS
2003
- Certain IFRS have already superseded the past IAS, but there are still some certain IAS that still remained
enforced of the present
2002
- Norwalk Agreement, which is an agreement between the IASB and the Standard Setting Body of the US,
which is Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). In this agreement, the two organization agreed to
try to converge the US GAAP and the International Standards
2020
- 17 IFRS and 28 IAS enforced
❖ Philippine Standard Setting Body
○ Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC)
○ Philippines Interpretations Committee (PIC)
November 18, 1981
- Accounting Standard Council (ASC) was created by PICPA and was in charge of promulgating the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
2004
- Replacement happened through the RA 9298 (Accountancy Law)
- Philippines adapted the IAS and IFRS
- FRSC renamed IAS and IFRS to PAS and PFRS
2006
- PIC is a counterpart of IFRIC
△What happened before 1981, where we don’t have the standards committee yet? What standards
do Philippine companies follow? Do they even have standards they follow?
➔ Before ASC was created and SFAS was published, accounting was freestyle. It depends on the company on
what information they want to disclose
*Key characteristics of a Monitoring Board is independence. Members are different government agencies of
different countries.
*IASC is the predecessor of IASB. SIC is the predecessor of IFRS.
Independence
- It must not be dependent on the opinions of an individual country or an individual sector considering that
IASB is an international organization, it must consider opinions from different countries
Thorough
- There is a period for commenting and the standard is not fixed. It is continuously revised to reflect the
current situation. It is systematic because there is a step by step process.
This is done in order to minimize the unintended consequences before it becomes an official standard.
The board asks for comments from business persons, investors, regulators and accounting professionals across
the globe.
★ 3 Types of Pronouncements/Publications
● Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
- The one that lays out the general principles or guiding characteristics which the provisions of IFRS try to
capture
● IFRS Interpretations
- Are explanations of the IFRS
★ Hierarchy of IFRS
- Companies should use standards in this order of priority
1. IFRS
a. International Accounting Standards (IAS) - issued by IASC
b. IFRS Interpretations
c. IAS Interpretations - issued by SIC
*take note some IFRS already supersede some IAS. If IAS is superseded, it means it is already replaced.
❖ Composition of FRSC
➔ 15 members (3-year term renewable for another 3-year term), appointed by BOA
➔ Chairman should be a senior accounting practitioner
➔ 14 representatives
◆ 1 BOA
◆ 1 SEC
◆ 1 BSP
◆ 1 BIR
◆ 1 COA
◆ 1 Organization of preparers and users of financial statements
◆ 8 from the accredited professional organizations of CPAs:
● 2 ACPAPP (public practice)
● 2 ACPACI (commerce and industries)
● 2 NACPAE (education)
● 2 GACPA (government)
❖ FRSC Due Process
➔ Similar to IASB, FRSC has its own due process. FRSC does not simply adopt a new IFRS standard without
first analyzing its implications.
➔ Exposure Draft, issuing a comment, approved by the majority of FRSC members (8 since 15). Generally, the
draft is open to public for comments for 60 days, but FRSC has the option to shorten this period for 30 days
if the FRSC deems that shorter period would already suffice
- In charge of interpreting the adopted standards or the PAS and PFRS, which are still subject for approval of
the FRSC
- May also inform the FRSC of certain issues that are not covered or addressed by the presenting/existing
PAS and PFRS
Regulatory Bodies
- BIR (national taxes)
- LGU (local taxes)
- SEC (listed securities)
- BSP (monetary policy)
- PICPA (all CPAS in Philippines)
Others
- BOA - the body authorized by RA 9298 to - FRSC
promulgate rules and regulations affecting the - COA
practice of accountancy profession in the - FinEx
Philippines - ACPAE
- ACPAPP - PIMA
- ACPACI - AASC
- GACPA - Etc
- RAMA