Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25-Space Maintenance For Areas of Multiple Loss of Teeth
25-Space Maintenance For Areas of Multiple Loss of Teeth
25
Space Maintenance for
Areas of Multiple Loss of
Teeth
Assistant Professor
Aseel Haidar
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
Loss of multiple primary molars in the primary or mixed dentition may lead to sever
change and mutilation of the developing dentition unless an appliance is constructed to
maintain relationships of the remaining teeth and to guide eruption of the developing teeth.
In addition to arch dimension concerns, reduced masticatory function is undesirable from
a nutritional standpoint and also a collection of plaque material and food debris after loss
of the normal cleansing function will result in increased dental caries activity and gingival
inflammation. Cross bite of 1st permanent molar and subsequent anterior drifting of the
permanent molars occurs after loss of maxillary primary molar.
3- Transpalatal arch.
formed and this can be done by taking X-ray to follow the eruption of the permanent
successor, when the 1st permanent molar and incisors have erupted, a partial denture S.M.
or a lingual arch can be constructed to serve until remaining permanent teeth erupt.
2
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
2) When the first permanent molar is lost after the eruption of the second permanent
molar, orthodontic evaluation is indicated, and the following points should be
considered: Is the child in need of corrective treatment other than in the first
permanent molar area? Should the space be maintained for a replacement
prosthesis? Should the second molar be moved forward into the area formerly
occupied by the first molar? The latter choice is often the more satisfactory, even
though there will be a difference in the number of molars in the opposing arch. A
third molar can often be removed to compensate for the difference. Without
treatment, the second molar will tip forward within a matter of weeks.
3) Another option to consider is autotransplantation of a third molar into the first molar
position.
3
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
Notes:
** The early-mixed dentition (6 to 9 years of age) is a period much more prone to
localized factors that may result in severe malocclusion problems if undetected
3. Distal step
Distal surface of lower second primary molar is distal to the same surface
of the maxillary molar is abnormal and is indicative of a developing class
II malocclusion.
Notes:
** The pattern of transition involving the straight terminal plane is normal but that the
occlusion forming a mesial step is more ideal.
5
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
2. Intertransitional period
This is a relatively quiet (lag) phase and no active tooth eruption is seen. In this
period the maxillary and mandibular arches consist of deciduous and permanent teeth.
Between the permanent incisors and the first permanent molars are the deciduous molars
and canines (the permanent incisors and the permanent molars sandwich the primary
canines and molars). This phase during the mixed dentition period is relatively stable and
no change occurs. Only few changes in the morphology of the primary teeth are seen
because they undergo attrition.
1. Leeway space:
6
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
7
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
ARCH-LENGTH ANALYSIS
1. Nance Analysis.
As a result of comprehensive studies, Nance concluded the followings:
1. The length of the dental arch from the mesial surface of one mandibular first permanent
molar to the mesial surface of the corresponding tooth on the opposite side is always
shortened during the transition from the mixed to the permanent dentition.
2. Nance observed that in the average patient's mandibular arch a leeway of 1.7 mm per
side exists between the combined mesiodistal widths of the primary mandibular canine and
first and second primary molars and the mesiodistal widths of the corresponding permanent
teeth, with the primary teeth being larger.
3. This difference in the total mesiodistal width of the corresponding three primary teeth
in the maxillary arch compared with the width of the three permanent teeth that succeed
them is only 0.9 mm per side.
Recently, Nance arch length analysis is seldom used, partly because:
The involved procedures for this analysis require a complete set of periapical
radiographs.
The clinical reliability of other analyses that do not use radiographs is
sufficient for determining major arch-length inadequacies.
It is time consuming.
8
Lec.25 Pedodontics Fifth stage
The analysis is based on a correlation of tooth size; one may measure a tooth
or a group of teeth and predict accurately the size of the other teeth in the same
mouth.
The mandibular incisors, because they erupt early in the mixed dentition and
may be measured accurately, have been chosen for the measurement to predict
the size of the upper, as well as the lower, posterior teeth.
4. Bolton analysis.
This analysis addresses tooth mass discrepancies between the maxillary and
mandibular arches. It can be used to compare the sum of the mesiodistal widths of the 12
maxillary teeth with that of the 12 mandibular teeth, from the first molar to first molar, and
to compare the 6 maxillary teeth with the 6 mandibular teeth, canine to canine.
The Bolton analysis ratio is as follows:
(Sum mandibular)/ (Sum maxillary) x 100 = Tooth mass ratio
For the overall ratio (12 teeth versus 12 teeth), the mean is 91.3 (±1.91) %.
For the anterior ratio (6 teeth versus 6 teeth), the mean is 77.2 (±1.65) %.
When a significant discrepancy with these ratios is noted, the clinician must assess
where the tooth mass problem is located and decide on the best method to resolve it.