Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dox MLA - Edited
Dox MLA - Edited
Ryan Allan
comment #1
Business report
USE THIS
Document Details
Submission ID
trn:oid:::1:2677986038 4 Pages
Download Date
File Name
dox_MLA.edited.docx
File Size
15.3 KB
0%
Caution: Percentage may not indicate academic misconduct. Review required.
Our testing has found that there is a higher incidence of false positives when the percentage is less than 20. In order to reduce the
likelihood of misinterpretation, the AI indicator will display an asterisk for percentages less than 20 to call attention to the fact that
the score is less reliable.
However, the final decision on whether any misconduct has occurred rests with the reviewer/instructor. They should use the
percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their student and/or use it to examine the submitted assignment in
greater detail according to their school's policies.
Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the submission highlights and the
percentage shown.
In a longer document with a mix of authentic writing and AI generated text, it can be difficult to exactly determine where the AI writing begins and original writing
ends, but our model should give you a reliable guide to start conversations with the submitting student.
Disclaimer
Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify
both human and AI-generated text) so it should not be used as the sole basis for adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an
organization's application of its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred.
Due Date
Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" exemplifies persuasive writing.
Written in 1963 while King was imprisoned for organizing civil rights protests, the letter
responds to criticism from eight white clergy members and aims to justify nonviolent resistance
against unjust laws. He crafts an insightful argument using compelling rhetorical techniques,
including ethos, pathos, logos, and rhetorical questions. Ultimately, "Letter from Birmingham
Jail" is a persuasive masterpiece in which King morally elevates his movement above its critics.
King establishes his goodwill and ethical appeal by politely justifying his presence in
expressing disappointment with the clergymen's criticism of the timing of the protests, writing,
"I hope to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms" (par. 3).
This serves to construct King as a credible leader seeking moral progress through nonviolence.
King further enhanced his character by highlighting his leadership role in the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference, invoking his authority and reputation as an influential civil
rights figure. Developing this strong ethical appeal is crucial for King to be seen as a respected
In addition to ethos, King uses pathos to elicit sympathy for African Americans
lynch[ing] your mothers and fathers,” hate-filled policemen abusing blacks, the daily
indignities of segregation, and unsolved bombings of churches (par. 12). This draws the
emotions of the reader, generating outrage against such injustice to morally justify civil
puts a human face on oppression to compel support for the civil rights movement. By vividly
detailing the brutality and hardship endured by blacks, King aims to awaken the conscience of
the white moderates to recognize segregation as a grave moral crisis requiring action.
Logos is also deftly utilized as King argues that segregation contradicts morality and
natural law. He pronounces that "an unjust law is no law at all" and "one has a moral
responsibility to disobey unjust laws" (par. 14-16). This appeal to longstanding philosophical
and religious principles provides a logical basis for breaking segregation laws without
sanctioning general lawlessness. King bolsters the reasonableness of his case by invoking
historical examples of justified civil disobedience from Shadrach and Jesus to reinforce that
not all law-breaking is unethical. This appeal to logic frames civil disobedience not as a
criminal disorder but a principled moral duty in the face of legalized injustice.
Beyond these classic appeals, King's brilliant use of rhetorical questioning gives
persuasive power to his arguments. After vividly detailing the evils of segregation, he asks
rhetorically how the clergymen can worry about merely the timing of protests in the face of
such injustice: "I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind
of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes"
(par. 10). This questioning calls out the privileged blindness of the clergymen to necessitate
bolder action. Additional rhetorical questions, like asking if negotiated patience somehow
redeems oppression, further King's case for active resistance. The disarming use of questioning
guides the audience to reconsider their views in light of King's moral arguments.
While a persuasive text, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" does have some rhetorical
limitations. Its substantial length, spanning many pages, challenges the patience of readers. A
more concise expression of King's core arguments may have enabled swifter persuasion.
Furthermore, King's passionate condemnations of moderates and the church for their inaction
could be overly accusatory for the clergy members's audience, potentially eliciting
defensiveness rather than conversion to his cause. A constructive call to action may have been
more effective. Nevertheless, these minor weaknesses do not significantly detract from the
overall persuasive power of "Letter from Birmingham Jail." The letter remains incredibly
King morally elevates his nonviolent movement over its critics through insightful
arguments and skillful rhetoric. The eloquent "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a persuasive
text and a work of profound inspiration that continues to resonate today. It remains a timeless
testament to the power of words to advocate for justice. King's brilliance is in framing civil
disobedience not as radical lawlessness but as a moral obligation in the face of legalized
immorality. This moral framing was instrumental in gathering broader sympathy and support
for the civil rights movement, bringing national attention to the urgent need to dismantle
segregation. The letter's historic impact speaks to its sheer rhetorical excellence.
In conclusion, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" showcases Martin Luther King Jr.'s gifts
as a persuasive writer and thinker. Through appeals to ethics, emotion, and logic, King puts
forward an eloquent moral argument that compelled the national conscience. The letter stands
as a rhetorical masterpiece and a literary monument that advanced the cause of civil rights
through its words' simple yet profound power. It remains required reading for understanding
the power of persuasive writing to shape society for the better. The letter's elegance, insight,
and persuasive force reveal King's role not only as an activist but as a visionary artist uniquely
capable of touching the conscience of a nation. It remains essential reading for understanding
Works Cited
King Jr., Martin Luther. “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” The Martin Luther King, Jr.
kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/letter-birmingham-jail. Accessed 8
Sept. 2023.