Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.0m Abutment Design (4 P.C Girder-12 Pile) (Final & Ok)
6.0m Abutment Design (4 P.C Girder-12 Pile) (Final & Ok)
C/L of bearing
C/L of pier
1.33 ft. 128.5ft. span of noncomposite loads
0.1 ft.
Figure 1-2: X-Section of P.C. I-Girder Bridge
1.1 - Overhanging width of deck slab: (C4.6.2.6.1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 4-55)
1. Overhang width is less or equal to 0.5Sg = 3.9 ft
Applied overhanging width from C/L of facia girder = 4.8 ft
1.4 - Top flange thickness of P.C. I-girder: (S 5.12.3.5.1a, AASHTO-2017, Page; 5-219)
m
1. Min top flange thickness of girder, t tf > clear span between webs divided by 20 = 4.1 in.
m
2. Min top flange thickness of girder as per AASHTO I‐Beams type V‐VI, t tf = 5.0 in.
Applied girder top flange thickness, ttf = 6.0 in.
1.6 - Bottom flange thickness of P.C. I-girder: (S 5.12.3.5.1b, AASHTO-2017, Page; 5-219)
m
1. Min bottom flange thickness of girder, t bf > 5.5 in. = 5.5 in.
m
2. Min bottom flange thick. of girder, t bf > clear span between webs divided by 30 = 2.7 in.
m
3. Min bottom flange thick. of girder as per AASHTO I‐Beams type V‐VI, t bf = 8.0 in.
Applied girder bottom flange thickness, tbf = 10.0 in.
(g) 20 12 6 in.
(f) (e) 3
(d) 4
4
12 in.
10in.
10 in.
(b)
(a)
10
32 in.
Figure 1-3: X-Section of Non Composite P.C. I-Girder
Table 1-1 Noncomposite P.C. I-girder section properties along X-X or strong axis:
Neutral axis,
Gross area, Ag y of each part
2
Ix of each part AY y - Yb A*(y - Yb) Moment of
Part from bottom 3 N.A (in.) 4
(in.2) Inertia, Ig (in. )
4
(in. ) (in. ) (in.) (in. )
4
(in.)
Yb Yt
a 320 5.0 2667 1600 -34.9 390243
b 100 13.3 556 1333 -26.6 70693
c 732 40.5 226981 29646 0.6 245
d 16 69.7 14.2 1115 29.7 14156
39.9 40.1 1172434
e 60 72.5 45.0 4350 32.6 63682
f 36 73.0 18.0 2628 33.1 39391
g 264 77.0 792 20328 37.1 362952
Total = 1528 231072 61000 941361
2.4 - Shear distribution factor of an interior P.C. I-girder with two or more design lanes:
2
Two or more design lanes, DV = 0.2+S g/12‐(Sg/35) = 0.81
Applying skew correction factor, DV = 0.81
(T 4.6.2.2.3a-1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 4-43)
2.5 - Shear distribution factor of an interior P.C. I-girder with one design lane:
One design lane, DV = 0.36+S g/25 = 0.67
Applying skew correction factor, DV = 0.68
X1
4.6 ft. 2.0 ft. 6 ft. 0.0 ft.
4.3 ft. X2
7.87 ft.
Figure 2-2: Lever rule of an exterior P.C. I-girder
2.6 - Moment distribution factor of an exterior P.C. I-girder with one design lane using lever rule:
Fatigue limit state, DM = (X1+X2)/(2*Sg) (T 4.6.2.2.2d‐1, AASHTO‐2017, Page; 4‐40) = 0.38
Service & strength limit state, DM will be multiplied by multilple presence factor = 0.46
2.7 - Shear distribution factor of an exterior P.C. I-girder with two or more design lanes:
Ecentricity of a design truck, e = 0.6+de/10 (T 4.6.2.2.3b‐1, AASHTO‐2017, Page; 4‐45) = 0.61
Two or more design lanes, DV = e*DVInterior = 0.50
2.8 - Shear distribution factor of an exterior P.C. I-girder with one design lane using lever rule:
Service and strength limit state, DV = DMExterior *SC = 0.46
C/L
10.0 ft.
3.9
11.8 ft.
Figure 2-3: Additional Check of Rigidly Connected P.C. I-Girder
2.9 - Distribution factor of an exterior P.C. I-girder with one design lane by additional check:
Number of lane, NL = 1.0 nos.
Horizontal distance from C.G. of pattern to exterior girder, Xext = 11.8 ft.
Ecentricity of a design truck from C.G. of pattern of girders, Σe = 7.0 ft.
Fatigue limit state reaction on exterior beam in terms of lanes, R = NL/Ng+Xext(Σe)/Σx2 = 0.51
Strength limit state applying multiple presence factor, R = 0.62
(EQ C4.6.2.2.2d-1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 4-39)
2.10 - Distribution factor of an exterior P.C. I-girder with two or more design lane by additional check:
Number of lane, NL = 2.0 nos.
Ecentricity of a design truck from C.G. of pattern of girders, Σe = 1.9 ft.
2
Reaction on exterior beam in terms of lanes, R = NL/Ng+Xext(Σe)/Σx = 0.57
Strength limit state applying multiple presence factor, R = 0.57
Table 2-1 Summary of service and strength limit state distribution factors:
Distribution factors Load case DV for interior girder DV for exterior girder
14 ft. 14 ft.
Figure 3-1: Design Truck of HL-93K
1.1 ft.
a1
3.9 ft.
7.9 ft. 2.0
13.4 ft. Toe
20.7 ft.
Z Z'
25 kip 25 kip
4 ft.
Figure 5-1: Design Tandem
Total load for design tandem (S 3.6.1.2.3, AASHTO-2017, Page; 3-23) = 50.0 kip
8 - Surcharge Live-Load:
Coefficient of at rest lateral earth pressure, Ko = 0.33
Height of abutment wall with pile cap, habut-pilecap = 19.7 ft.
Height of abutment wall, habut (T 3.11.6.4-1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 3-142) = 15.7 ft.
Equivalent height of soil for highway loading on abutment, h eq = 2.0 ft.
Length of abutment for surcharge load, Labut-sur = 29.2 ft.
Length of wing wall with cantilever portion, Lwing+cant. = 19.4 ft.
Unit weight of soil, γs = 0.12 kcf
Table 10-1 - General arrangement of pile cap & pile (S 16.10, Winter-Nilson, 14th Edition, Page; 585)
Co-orinate with respect to Pier C.G. Coorinate with respect to Pile C.G.
Long direction Tran. Direction Total pile Long direction Tran. Direction Ipg = Ʃy2x Ʃy2z
Pile No.
x (ft.) z (ft.) npile (no's) Cx (ft.) Cz (ft.) y2x (ft.2) y2z(ft.2)
1 7.87 15.74 1.0 7.87 15.74 62 248
2 7.87 5.25 1.0 7.87 5.25 62 28
3 7.87 -5.25 1.0 7.87 -5.25 62 28
4 7.87 -15.74 1.0 7.87 -15.74 62 248
5 0.00 15.74 1.0 0.00 15.74 0 248
6 0.00 5.25 1.0 0.00 5.25 0 28
7 0.00 -5.25 1.0 0.00 -5.25 0 28
8 0.00 -15.74 1.0 0.00 -15.74 0 248
9 -7.87 15.74 1.0 -7.87 15.74 62 248
10 -7.87 5.25 1.0 -7.87 5.25 62 28
11 -7.87 -5.25 1.0 -7.87 -5.25 62 28
12 -7.87 -15.74 1.0 -7.87 -15.74 62 248
C.G. of pile 0.00 0.00 12 0.00 0.00 496 1652
10 6 2
11 7 3
12 8 4
Longitudinal Direction
In service limit state condition maxm axial load on pile = 231 kip
= 105 Ton
10.2 - Load on individual piles at ULS Condition
Table 10-5 - Load combination as ultimate limit state condition
Py Pz Px Mx Mz Mxe Mze
Load case
kip kip kip kip-ft kip-ft kip-ft kip-ft
Strength I 3463 0 270 0 198 0 0
Strength II 3306 0 248 0 -359 0 0
Strength III 2776 0 173 0 -2238 0 0
Strength IV 3164 0 173 0 -2149 0 0
Strength V 3306 0 248 0 -359 0 0
Extreme Event I 2972 0 156 0 -944 0 0
11.1 - Reinforcement along longitudinal direction (LHS): (EQ 3.1, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 117)
Balanced steel ratio, ρb = .85*β1*f'c/fy*87000/(87000+fy) = 0.049
Maxm steel ratio, ρmax = 0.75*ρb (EQ 3.2, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 117) = 0.04
Assume 20 mm ɸ bar will be use, as = 0.49 in2
Effective depth of pile cap, de = Dp-cap - Ie - cc - 0.5*φ = 3.3 ft.
C.G of flexural section up to abutment face = 3.6 ft.
Consider area of provided steel, AS Trial here = 38.9 in.2
11.7 - Temperature & shrinkage reinforcement: (EQ 5.10.6-1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 5-170)
Shrinkage and temperature reinf., AS(shrink) > 1.3*Wp-cap*Dp-cap/(2*(Wp-cap+Dp-cap)*fy) = 0.43 in.2/ft.
Total shrinkage and temperature reinforcement along longitudinal direction, A S(shrink total) = 15.51 in.2
Assume 32 no's 20 mm ɸ bar will be use, as = 15.58 in2
= Ok
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (Lp-cap - 2*cc)/(Nb - 1) = 8.0 in.
12 - Flexural Design Along Transverse Direction:
For tension control reinforcement, ɸt = 0.9
Concrete density modification factor, λ = 1.0
Concrete strength (28-days), f'c = 4.4 ksi
Yield strength of steel, fy = 60.0 ksi
Flexural cracking varibility factor, γ1 = 1.60
Ratio of minm yield strength to ultimate tensile strength, γ3 = 0.67
Tension controlled strain limit, εtl = 0.005
Stress block factor, α1 = 0.85
Stress block factor, β1 = 0.80
Clear cover for all side, cc = 3.0 in.
Embeded length of pile, le = 6.0 in.
Distance of pile c.g. from face of abutment along trans. direction for P6, P7, P11 & P12 = 9.35 ft.
Length of pile cap along transverse direction, Lpcap = 36.08 ft.
Width of pile cap along longitudinal direction, Wpcap = 20.66 ft.
Depth of pile cap, Dp-cap = 3.94 ft.
Area of pile cap up to abutment face = 167.6 ft2
m
12.2 - Max required reinforcement:
Area of provided steel, AS = 14.3 in.2
Distance between the neutral axis and the compressive face, c = A sfy/(α1*β1*f'c*Wp-cap) = 1.2 in.
The maxm amount of tensile reinforcement must be, c/d e < 0.003/(0.003 + £tl) 0.03 < 0.38
Ok
m
12.3 - Min required reinforcement:
Modulus of rupture for normal weight concrete, fr = 0.24λ√f'c = 0.50 ksi
Section modulus of pile-cap, Sp = Wp-cap*Dp-cap2/6 = 92197 in3
Cracking moment, Mcr = γ3(γ1*fr)Sp = 4123 kip-ft.
1.33 times the applied factored moment, 1.33Mu = 3296 kip-ft.
Applied moment is lesser of Mcr & 1.33Mu = 3296 kip-ft.
Provided stress, fp = Mcr/(Фt*Wp-cap*de2) = 0.12 ksi
Steel ratio, ρ = 0.85*f'c/fy*(1-√(1-2*fp/(0.85*f'c))) = 0.002
Area of steel required, As-req = ρ*Wp-cap*de Check here = 19.06 in.2
Area of provided steel, AS(P) = 19.06 in.2
As-applied>As-req, so ok
No. of provided bar, Nb = 39 no.
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (Wp-cap - 2*cc)/(Nb - 1) = 6.3 in.
m
12.5 - Max required reinforcement:
Area of provided steel, AS = 14.3 in.2
Distance between the neutral axis and the compressive face, c = A sfy/(α1*β1*f'c*Wp-cap) = 1.2 in.
The maxm amount of tensile reinforcement must be, c/d e < 0.003/(0.003 + £tl) 0.03 < 0.38
Ok
m
12.6 - Min required reinforcement:
1.33 times the applied factored moment, 1.33Mu = 3296 kip-ft.
Applied moment is lesser of Mcr & 1.33Mu = 3296 kip-ft.
Provided stress, fp = Mcr/(Фt*Wp-cap*de2) = 0.12 ksi
Steel ratio, ρ = 0.85*f'c/fy*(1-√(1-2*fp/(0.85*f'c))) = 0.002
Area of steel required, As-req = ρ*Wp-cap*de Check here = 19.1 in.2
Area of provided steel, AS(P) = 19.1 in.2
As-applied>As-req, so ok
No. of provided bar, Nb = 39 no.
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (Wp-cap - 2*cc)/(Nb - 1) = 6.3 in.
12.7 - Temperature & shrinkage reinforcement:
Shrinkage and temperature reinf., AS(shrink) = 1.3*Lp-cap*Dp-cap/(2*(Lp-cap+Dp-cap)*fy) = 0.461 in.2/ft.
Total shrinkage and temperature reinforcement along transverse direction, A S(shrink total) = 9.533 in.2
Assume 20 no's 20 mm ɸ bar will be use, as = 9.74 in2
= Ok
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (Wp-cap - 2*cc)/(Nb - 1) = 8.0 in.
m
13.2 - Max required reinforcement:
Area of provided steel, AS = 15.2 in.2
Distance between the neutral axis and the compressive face, c = A sfy/(α1*β1*f'c*Labut) = 0.8 in.
The maxm amount of tensile reinforcement must be, c/d e < 0.003/(0.003 + £tl) 0.036 < 0.38
Ok
m
13.3 - Min required reinforcement:
Modulus of rupture for normal weight concrete, fr = 0.24λ√f'c = 0.50 ksi
Section modulus of abutment, Sabut = Labut*tabut2/6 = 36952 in3
Cracking moment, Mcr = γ3*γ1*fr*Sabut = 1652 kip-ft.
1.33 times the applied factored moment, 1.33Mu = 1904 kip-ft.
Applied moment is lesser of Mcr & 1.33Mu = 1652 kip-ft.
Provided stress, fp = Mcr/(Фt*Labut*de2) = 0.12 ksi
Steel ratio, ρ = 0.85*f'c/fy*(1-√(1-2*fp/(0.85*f'c))) = 0.002
Area of steel required, As-req = ρ*Labut*de Check here = 17.53 in.2
Area of provided steel, AS(P) = 17.53 in.2
As-applied>As-req, so ok
No. of provided bar, Nb = 56 no.
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (Labut - 2*cc)/(Nb - 1) = 7.1 in.
13.4 - Temperature & shrinkage reinforcement:
Shrinkage and temperature reinforcement, AS(shrink) = 1.3*Labut*tabut/(2*(Labut+tabut)*fy) = 0.241 in.2/ft.
Shrinkage and temperature reinforcement for each face of abutment, AS(shrink, each face) = 3.80 in.2
Assume 22 no's 12 mm ɸ bar will be use, as = 3.86 in2
= Ok
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (habut - cc)/Nb = 8.0 in.
14 - Design of Wing Wall:
For tension control reinforcement, ɸt = 0.9
Concrete density modification factor, λ = 1.0
Concrete strength (28-days), f'c = 4.4 ksi
Yield strength of steel, fy = 60 ksi
Flexural cracking varibility factor, γ1 = 1.60
Ratio of minm yield strength to ultimate tensile strength, γ3 = 0.67
Tension controlled strain limit, εtl = 0.005
Stress block factor, α1 = 0.85
Stress block factor, β1 = 0.8
Length of wing wall, lwing = 11.5 ft.
Height of wing wall, hwing = 15.7 ft.
Thickness of wing wall, twing = 1.97 ft.
Factored moment at base of wing wall, Mwing = 1138 kip-ft.
Clear cover for all side, cc = 2.0 in.
m
14.2 - Max required reinforcement:
Area of provided steel, AS = 12.3 in.2
Distance between the neutral axis and the compressive face, c = A sfy/(α1*β1*f'c*lwing) = 1.8 in.
The maxm amount of tensile reinforcement must be, c/d e < 0.003/(0.003 + £tl) 0.086 < 0.38
Ok
m
14.3 - Min required reinforcement:
Modulus of rupture for normal weight concrete, fr = 0.24λ√f'c = 0.50 ksi
Section modulus of counter-fort, Sw = lwing*twing2/6 = 12805 in3
Cracking moment, Mcr = γ3*γ1*fr*Sw = 573 kip-ft.
1.33 times the applied factored moment, 1.33Mu = 1513 kip-ft.
Applied moment is lesser of Mcr & 1.33Mu = 573 kip-ft.
Provided stress, fp = Mcr/(Фt*lwing*de2) = 0.12 ksi
Steel ratio, ρ = 0.85*f'c/fy*(1-√(1-2*fp/(0.85*f'c))) = 0.002
Area of steel required, As-req = ρ*lwing*de Check here = 6.10 in.2
Area of provided steel, AS(P) = 12.33 in.2
As-applied>As-req, so ok
No. of provided bar, Nb = 25 no.
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (lwing - cc)/Nb = 5.4 in.
14.4 - Temperature & shrinkage reinforcement:
Shrinkage and temperature reinforcement, AS(shrink) = 1.3*lwing*twing/(2*(lwing+twing)*fy) = 0.22 in.2/ft.
Shrinkage and temperature reinforcement for each face of wing wall, A S(shrink, each face) = 3.44 in.2
Assume 20 no's 12 mm ɸ bar will be use, as = 3.51 in2
= Ok
Spacing of reinforcement, s = (hwing - cc)/Nb = 8.0 in.
15 - Pile Design:
Diameter of pile, Dp = 32.0 in.
Minm factored vertical load, P = 202442 Ib.
Maxm factored lateral load, Hu = 22.5 kip
Concrete strength (28-days), f'cp = 3.6 ksi
Yield strength of steel, fy = 60.0 ksi
Diameter of main bar proposed to be used in pile, db #6 = 0.8 in.
No's of main bar proposed to be used, Nbar = 16 no's
Clear cover with C/L. of longitudinal bar, cc (T 5.10.1-1, AASHTO-2017, Page; 5-165) = 3.4 in.
Modulus of elasticity of steel, Es (S 5.4.3.2, AASHTO-2017, Page; 5-22) = 29000 ksi
1.5
Modulus of elasticity of pile, Ep =33000*K 1*γc *√f'cp = 3498 ksi
Modulur ratio, n = Es/Ep = 8.3
Rate of increase of soil modulus for sand, nh = 0.556 ksi/ft.
(T C10.4.6.3-2, AASHTO-2017, Page; 10-21)
15.1 - Pile reinforcement:
Diameter of pile through center of longitudinal bars, Ds = Dp - 2*cc = 25.3 in.
The gross area of concrete, Ag = π/4*Dp2 = 804 in.2
Perimeter of pile through center of longitudinal bars, Ppile = πDs = 79.33 in.
Clear spacing of reinforcement, s = Ppile/Nbar = 4.54 in.
Reinforcement spacing is ok
Area of longitudinal steel provided in pile, Ast = Nbar*π/4*db2 = 7.07 in.2
Percentage of steel in pile, Pg = Ast/Ag = 0.009 %
Hence ok and % of steel is in safe condition
Moment of inertia of pile, Ip = π/64*Dp4 = 2.48 ft.4
(EQ C10.7.3.13.4-2, AASHTO-2017, Page; 10-121)
Length to fixity below the ground, Lf = 1.8*(Ep*lp/nh)0.2 = 12.4 ft.
Unsupported length of pile, Lu = 0.0 ft.
Design moment of pile, Mu = Hu*(Lf+Lu)/2 = 139.5 kip - ft
= 1673593 Ib-in.
Stress ratio of pile, m = fy/(0.85*f'c) (Art. 5.8, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 269) = 19.47
Ecectricity for bending, eb =0.43*Pg*m*Ds+0.14*Dp = 6.3 in.
(EQ 5.19c, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 270)
The actual ecentricity, e = Mu/P = 8.3 in.
(Appendix B, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 632) Hence ok & e > eb so in steel tension governes
Moment of inertia of longitudinal steel in pile, Is = Ast * Ds2/8 = 563 in.4
(Art. 5.8, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 274)
Moment of inertia contributed by steel, Ist = 100*pg*(2n-1)*Is = 7715 In.4
Total moment of inertia, Iut = Ip + Ist = 59187 In.4
(Art. 5.8, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 274)
Section modulus of transformed uncracked section, Sut = Iut /(Dp/2) = 3699 in.3
(Art. 5.8, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 269)
Allow avg. compression stress, Fa =0.34*(1+pg*m)*f'cp = 1443 Ib/in.2
Allow avg. bending stress, Fb = 0.45 * f'cp = 1631 Ib/in.2
Axial force, Pb = 1/(1/(Ag*Fa)+eb/(Sut*Fb)) (EQ 5.25, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 275) = 5.E+05 Ib
Balanced moment, Mb = pb*eb (EQ 5.26, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 275) = 3.E+06 Ib-in.
(EQ 5.20c, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 270)
Moment for spiral columns, Mc = 0.12*Ast*fy* Ds = 1285068 Ib-in.
The allowable bending moment, M = Mc + P / Pb * (Mb - Mc) = 2070834 Ib-in.
(EQ 5.21, Winter-Nilson, 7th Edition, Page; 271) Hence ok & Mr > Md so design is ok
16 nos. ## 6 bar
2.7 ft.
Figure 15-1: Pile Cross Section with Reinforcement