Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hittmair 2001
Hittmair 2001
THICKNESS IN CATS
M. HITTMAIR,
KATHARINA DR. MED.VET, HANNA DR. MED.VET.,
D. VIELGRADER,
GERHARD LOUPAL,DR.MED.VET.
Ultrasonography of the gallbladder and biliary tract was performed on 42 cats: 22 clinically healthy cats
(group A) and 20 cats with hepatobiliary disease and post mortem confirmation of gallbladder abnor-
malities (group B). The gallbladder wall was visible in 9 of 22 cats in group A and all 20 cats in group
B. Additional gallbladder findings in group B included shape anomalies, biliary tract obstruction, wall
thickening, polyps, neoplasia, and biliary sludge. Ultrasonographic evaluation of abdominal organs
identified pancreatic disease as the predominant pathological cause of extrahepatic biliary obstruction.
Hepatic parenchymal involvement was noted with inflammation and thickening of the gallbladder wall.
Histologically, gallbladder walls were characterized by mucous gland hyperplasia, inflammation, infil-
tration, edema, epithelial detachment, and/or neoplasia. Ultrasonographic and histologic gallbladder
wall measurements of 20 cats in group B agreed within 0.4 mm and all cats with a gallbladder wall
thickness 21.0 mm had histopathologic abnormalities of the wall. Serum biochemical analysis revealed
elevations of one or more parameters in all cats of group B, but was non-specific for a gallbladder lesion.
The results of this study indicate that a visible, echogenic gallbladder wall can be considered a normal
variant and is not always associated with hepatobiliary disease. Ultrasonography is accurate in mea-
suring gallbladder wall thickness. Wall thickness greater than l mm is accurate in predicting galiblad-
der disease in cats, while a thickness less than 1 mm cannot rule out mild or chronic inflammation.
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2001, p p 149-155.
From the Radiology Clinic (Hittmair, Vielgrader) and Institute for Pa- Materials and Methods
thology and Forensic Veterinary Medicine (Loupal), University of Veteri-
nary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. Forty-two cats were included in this study and divided
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Katharina Hittmair, into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 22 clinically healthy
Radiology Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veteriniirplatz I ,
A- I2 1 0 Vienna, Austria. cats from a breeding colony, 1 I males and 11 females, with
Received March 27, 2000; accepted for publication August 21, 2000. an average age of 9 yrs (range 8 to 10 yrs). No abnormalities
149
150 HITTMAIR
ET AL. 200 I
Results
In 22 healthy cats of group A, 10 cats did not have a
visible gallbladder wall (Fig. 1). Nine cats had a gallbladder
with a thin echogenic wall, ranging in thickness from 0.4-
0.9 mm. An abnormal gallbladder shape but without wall
visualization was found in 3 cats. All abdominal organs in
group A cats were sonographically normal.
FIG.2. Biliary obstruction in a cat. The gallbladder is distended, the
"ATL HD1-3000, Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash- gallbladder neck, cystic duct, and common bile duct are dilated. Extrahe-
ington, USA. patic biliary obstruction was caused by chronic pancreatitis.
VOL. 42, No. 2 WALL1 HICKNESS
GALLBLADDER - -
IN L A T S 151
FIG. 6. Gallbladder wall polyp. There is a 6 mm, focal, echogenic, FIG.8. Mild gallbladder wall thickening with mild inflammation. The
intraluminal wall mass in the gallbladder fundus. Mild diffuse wall thick- gallbladder wall is hyperechoic and measures 0.8 mm.
ening is also apparent. Reverberation artifacts are seen in the near field
within the gallbladder.
is described as occasionally being- a non-specific and inci-
dental finding associated with other organ abnormalities.83y
adenopathy (1/7), and nephropathy (1/7). Ultrasonographic
The most apparent ultrasonographic gallbladder finding in 2
findings of the abdomen were unremarkable in 2 cats, ex-
groups of cats in this study was a visible, sometimes thick-
cept for gallbladder wall thickening.
ened, hyperechoic gallbladder wall. In 9 (40.9%) of 22 cats
In 11 (55%) of 20 group B cats, ultrasonographic and
of group A and all 20 cats (100%) of group B, gallbladder
histologic gallbladder wall measurements agreed within 0.4
walls were visible. Since cats of group A did not have
mm. In the other 9 (45%) cats, agreement was within 0.15
clinical signs or serum biochemistry abnormalities and were
mm.
regarded as a control group, we concluded that a visible
Serum biochemistry values were normal in all cats of
gallbladder wall is not necessarily associated with hepato-
group A and one cat in group B. All values were elevated at
biliary disease in the cat. Reasons for an ultrasonographi-
least five-fold in cats with signs of biliary obstruction. Se-
cally visible gallbladder wall in these healthy cats may be
rum bile acids were at least slightly elevated in all cats but
improved equipment or sonographer skills, previous gall-
one in group B.
bladder disease, or a normal variant. Normal ultrasono-
Discussion graphic gallbladder wall thickness of 3.0 mm in humans”
and 2.0-3.0 mm in dogs’4 is high compared to the measure-
The normal gallbladder wall has been noted to be unde-
ments made of visible walls in normal cats in this study
tectable ultrasonographically. l 7 Gallbladder wall thickening
(0.4-0.9 mm). This may be explained by more sensitive
equipment and measurements. Furthermore, there was an
overlap between wall measurements in both groups of cats. thickening due to chronic inflammation and scarring ex-
Gallbladder walls of cats in group B with ultrasonographic plains the hyperechoic gallbladder wall.”
measurements as thin as 0.2 mm were characterized histo- Neoplasia of the gallbladder or biliary tract is reported to
logically by mild inflammation or mucosal gland hyperpla- be rare in the Adenomas and adenocarcinomas are
sia. In these cats the gallbladder wall was considered ab- mentioned as the most probable type of tumor found in the
normally thickened because of clinical signs, concurrent gallbladder wall, while other types of neoplasia affect he-
abnormalities of abdominal organs and/or elevated serum patic parenchyma.22326The ultrasonographic appearance of
biochemistry parameters. Necropsy findings in the cats of biliary cystadenomas in cats has recently been described as
this study included chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic neopla- cystic lesions within the liver.27 The gallbladder wall mass
sia, chronic liver disease, and biliary obstruction as the pre- found in one cat had polypous proliferation of the epithe-
dominant underlying causes for gallbladder wall thickening. lium with lymphoid infiltration of the wall and common bile
Pancreatic and gastrointestinal disease, such as inflam- duct. Ultrasonographically, the tumor had a wide base and
mation and neoplasia, have been reported as the most com- infiltrated the gallbladder wall. Histopathologic diagnosis
mon cause for extrahepatic biliary obstruction. ‘ , I x Some pa- was lymphosarcoma. This type of gallbladder wall tumor
tients with biliary obstruction may not have a distended has not been described previously. Secondary to the tumor,
gallbladder when the gallbladder is contracted due to in- cholestasis was present due to mechanical intraluminal ob-
flammation. The common bile duct may remain dilated struction. Neoplastic wall lesions are difficult to differenti-
following resolution of a previous obstruction when the ate ultrasonographically from benign polyps. In a recent
elasticity of the wall is decreased by prolonged distension or report, ultrasonographic angiography was performed to dif-
inflammation” (Fig. 2). Thickening of the gallbladder wall ferentiate between various gallbladder wall lesions in hu-
was present in all cats with biliary tract obstruction in this mans and found to be limited in the differential diagnosis of
study. Extrahepatic bile duct obstruction from pancreatitis small polypoid-type gallbladder carcinomas and benign le-
or enteritis will lead to reflux with bacteria colonizing the sions2’
biliary tract, resulting in cholecystitis.” Obstruction of lym- Ultrasonographically, gallbladder form anomalies in cats
phatic drainage of the gallbladder results in increased inter- are frequently seen as incidental findings29 and are ex-
stitial fluid and thickening of the gallbladder wall. l 4 plained by the embryologic development of the gallbladder.
Diffuse thickening of the gallbladder wall in humans is The embryonic gallbladder is split longitudinally during the
often associated with inflammation or cholecystitis. How- solid stage, creating a partially divided organ. These paired
ever, the sensitivity of these findings in distinguishing be- buds are connected to each other, while the fundic ends
tween acute and chronic cholecystitis is not high.*’ The remain separated. A bilobed gallbladder represents an in-
double rim effect of the gallbladder wall is usually seen with complete resolution of the solid stage with a remaining fold
acute cholecystitis and is due to edema and inflammation of or septum.3o Ultrasonographic evaluation of gallbladder
the gallbladder wall.’* The significance of this layered wall wall thickness in these cats is the same as with normal
appearance is limited in differentiating between chronic and gallbladder forms.
acute gallbladder disease, and the layers are no more spe- Ultrasonographic gallbladder wall measurements in the
cific for inflammation than the thickened wall itself.” In a cats of group B were similar to histologic measurements.
study of gallbladder wall thickening in humans, attempts All gallbladder walls visualized ultrasonographically had
were made to correlate gallbladder wall thickness to the histologic features consistent with mild inflammation or
degree of cholecystitis, with measurements under 3 mm mucosal gland hyperplasia. Given the fact that gallbladder
indicating mild inflammation, greater than 3 mm acute wall thickness may vary according to the degree of disten-
cholecystitis, 3-6 mm with chronic disease, and greater than sion, no significant differences were found in the measure-
6 mm gangrenous cholecystitis.” As there was an overlap ments. In humans, this has been reported previously.2133’ On
in wall measurements with chronic and acute cholecystitis, the other hand, gallbladder contractions may increase wall
it was found that the type of gallbladder wall pathology width and thereby simulate pathologic thickening.” These
could not be decided on the basis of the ultrasonographic contractions may be responsible for a “thickened” gallblad-
appearance, unless there was severe inflammation.’3 In this der wall in some clinically healthy cats. Age-related thick-
study, cats of group B with ultrasonographically visible, ening of the gallbladder should also be considered. Special
thick, double-rimmed gallbladder walls had acute forms of care should be taken to rule out artifacts, such as refraction,
cholecystitis, while a thinner, single-layered, hyperechoic slice thickness, and reverberation, which may cause the
wall was more characteristic of chronic or mild inflamma- gallbladder wall to appear thickened ultrasonographically. l 4
tion. The ultrasonographic, double-rimmed gallbladder wall Pseudothickening of the gallbladder wall is also seen with
appearance with acute cholecystitis was due in part by peritoneal effusion due to the acoustic interface between the
edema of the epithelium. Chronic cholecystitis leads to hy- fluid and the wall.I7
perplasia of the mucous glands in the Irreversible One of the problems faced when examining the gallblad-
154 HITTMAIR
ET AL. 200 1
der wall at necropsy is its rapid disintegration. Cats have (9/22) had normal serum biochemistry values, while group
fewer mucous glands in the gallbladder wall than dogs.32 B cats with similar gallbladder wall measurements had el-
The mucous glands protect the wall from the detergent ef- evated parameters. Total bilirubin, ALP, GGT, and bile ac-
fects of bile acids.33 Autolysis of the gallbladder wall begins ids are reported to be highly elevated with c h o l e ~ t a s i sand
~~
immediately after death, as soon as mucous secretion stops. also found in our study. Serum bile acids were elevated in
These autolytic areas are histopathologically similar to wall all cats of group B except for one, and this parameter may
necrosis described with acute c h o l e ~ y s t i t i sand
~ ~ may lead be an indication for hepatobiliary disease in cats.
to a false diagnosis or measurement. The time lapse between The results of this study indicate that normal ultrasono-
the ultrasonographic examination of the gallbladder and graphic gallbladder wall thickness in cats is difficult to de-
subsequent histopathology was therefore kept to a mini- fine. Identification of the gallbladder wall in clinically
mum. The cats in group B were euthanized within 5 days healthy cats may be due to previous disease, gallbladder
following the ultrasonographic examination. Some of the contractions, age, or a normal variant. Further studies with
gallbladder wall measurements were repeated before eutha- histopathologic examinations of the gallbladder wall from
nasia. The gallbladder in euthanized cats (group B) was healthy cats are needed to clarify the significance of an
removed immediately post mortem and fixated in formalin. ultrasonographically visible wall. Ultrasonography is reli-
Autolysis or necrosis of the gallbladder wall did not appear able in measuring gallbladder wall thickness in cats. In this
to be a factor in this report. report, a gallbladder wall measuring 1 mm or thicker ap-
Serum biochemistry evaluations in the cats of this study pears to be indicative of gallbladder disease. However,
were not reliable in identifying gallbladder diseases or wall when the thickness is less than 1 mm mild inflammation or
thickening. Group A cats with a visible gallbladder wall chronic cholecystitis cannot be ruled out.
REFERENCES
I . Fossum TW, Willard MD. Diseases of the gallbladder and extrahe- 15. Besso JG, Wrigley RH, Gliatto JM, Webster CRL. Ultrasonographic
patic biliary system. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldmann EC. Textbook of veterinary appearance and clinical findings in 14 dogs with gallbladder mucocele. Vet
internal medicine, Vol. 2, 4th Ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 1995: Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:261-27 1.
1393-1398.
16. Newel1 SM, Selcer BA, Mahaffey MB, Gray ML. Jameson PH,
2. Reed AL. Ultrasonographic findings of diseases of the gallbladder Cornelius LM, Downs MO. Gallbladder mucocele causing biliary obstruc-
and biliary tract. Vet Med 1995;90:950-958. tion in two dogs: UltrdSOnogrdphiC, scintigraphic, and pathological find-
3. Lamb C. Abdominal ultrasonography in small animals: examination ings. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1995;31:467472.
of the liver, spleen, and pancreas. J Small Anim Pract 1990;31:6-15. 17. Santilli RA, Biller DS. Ultrasonography of the liver and biliary tract.
4. Neer TM. A review of disorders of the gallbladder and extrahepatic Eur J Compan Anim Pract 1994;IV:57-66.
biliary disease. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:186-192. 18. Fahie MA, Martin RA. Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction: A retro-
5. Nelson RW, Couto CG. Hepatobiliary diseases of the cat. In: Nelson spective study of 45 cases (1983-1993). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1995;
RW, Couto CG. Small animal internal medicine. St. Louis, Mosby-Year 3 1 :478482.
Book, 1992:398411.
19. LCveillC R, Biller DS, Shiroma JT. Sonographic evaluation of the
6. Center SA, Baldwin BH, Dillingham S, Erb HN, Tennant BC. Di- common bile duct in cats. J Vet Intern Med 1996;10:296-299.
agnostic value of serum y-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase
activities in hepatobiliary disease in the cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 20. Center SA. Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tree. In: Guilford
188:507-510. WG, et al. Strombeck’s small animal gastroenterology, 3rd Ed. Philadel-
phia, WB Saunders Co, 1996:860-888.
7. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der
Haustiere, 5th Ed. Vol. 11. Berlin, Verlag Paul Parey, 1982. 21. Engel JM, Deitch EA, Sikkema W. Gallbladder wall thickening:
sonographic accuracy and relation to disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;
8. Partington BP, Biller DS. Hepatic imaging with radiology and ul- 134:907-909.
trasound. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Practice 1995;25:305-336.
22. Nyland TG, Hager DA. Sonography of the liver, gallbladder, and
9. Hager DA, Nyland TG, Fischer R. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the
spleen. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Practice 1985;15:1123-1148.
canine liver, kidney, and prostate. Vet Radiol 1985;26:82-88.
23. Teefey SA, Baron RL, Bigler SA. Sonography of the gallbladder:
10. Bromel C, Barthez PY, L6veillC R, Scrivani PV. Pi-evalence of
significance of striated (layered) thickening of the gallbladder wall. AJR
gallbladder sludge in dogs as assessed by ultrasonography. Vet Radiol
Ultrasound 1998;39:206-210. Am J Roentgenol 1992;156:945-947.
1 I . Colli A, Cocciolo M, Buccino G, Parraviciui R, Martinez E, Rinaldi 24. Sandritter W, Thomas C. Histopathologie Lehrbuch und Atlas fur
G, Scaltrini A. Thickening of the gallbladder wall in ascites. J Clin Ultra- die Kurse der allgemeinen und speziellen Pathologie. Stuttgart, Schattauer
sound 1991; 19:357-359. Verlag, 1986.
12. Wegener M, Barsch G, Schneider J, Wedmann B, Winter R, Za- 25. Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, Wisner ER. Ultrasonography of the liver.
charias J. Gallbladder wall thickening: a frequent finding in various non- In: Nyland TG, Mattoon JS,eds. Veterinary diagnostic ultrasound. Phila-
biliary disorders-a prospective ultrasonographic study. J Clin Ultrasound delphia, WB Saunders Co, 199552-73.
1987;15:307-312. 26. Patnaik AK. A morphologic and immnocytochemical study of he-
13. Teefey SA, Kimrney MB, Bigler SA, Trowers EA, Sillery JK. Gall- patic neoplasms in cats. Vet Pathol 1992;29:405415,
bladder wall thickening: an in vitro sonographic study with histologic 27. Nyland TG, Koblik PD, Tellyer SE. Ultrasonographic evaluation
correlation. Acad Radioi l994;1:12I-l27. of biliary cystadenomas in cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound I999;40:30O-
14. Spaulding KA. Ultrasound corner: Gallbladder wall thickness. Vet 306.
Radiol Ultrasound I 993;34:270-272. 28. Kato T, Tsukamoto Y, Naitoh M, Mitake M, Hirooka T, Furukawa
VOL. 42, No. 2 GALLBLADDER IN CATS
WALLTHICKNESS 155