MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF)

Name of Employee: JEFFREY LOIS S. MAESTRADO Name of Rater: MARY THESSA JUDE C. DALUPERE
Position: TEACHER II Position: MASTER TEACHER I
School: JACINTO D. MALIMAS SR. NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Rating Period: MID-YEAR
Date of Review: FEBRUARY 7, 2023

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Mid-Year Review/ Rating

Weight per Performance
MFO KRAS OBJECTIVES Timeline
Objective
Means of Verification (Presented)
Target
Ratee Rater Mid-Year Review Results
Rating Ramarks Rating Ramarks
B KRA 1 Content 1. Applied knowledge of content Quality
A Knowledge within and across curriculum 7%
S and Pedagogy teaching areas. (PPST 1.1.2) Efficiency
I
C 2. Used a range of teaching Quality
strategies that enhance learner 7%
E achievement in literacy and Efficiency
D numeracy skills. (PPST 1.4.2)
3. Applied a range of teaching Quality
U strategies to develop critical and
C 7%
creative thinking, as well as other Efficiency
A higher-order thinking skills. (PPST
T KRA 2: 4. Managed classroom structure to Quality
I Learning engage learners, individually or in 7%
O Environment & groups, in meaningful exploration, Efficiency
N Diversity of discovery and hands-on activities
Learners 5. Managed learner behavior Quality
S constructively by applying positive 7%
E and non-violent discipline to ensure Efficiency
R learning-focused environments.
6. Used differentiated, Quality
V
I
developmentally appropriate 7%
learning experiences to address Efficiency
C
learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
E KRA 3: 7. Planned, managed and Quality
S Curriculum and implemented developmentally 7%
Planning sequenced teaching and learning Efficiency
processes to meet curriculum
8. Participated in collegial Quality
discussions that use teacher and 7%
learner feedback to enrich teaching Timeliness
practice. (PPST 4.4.2) MID Year
9. Selected, developed, organized Quality
and used appropriate teaching and 7%
learning resources, including ICT, to Efficiency
address learning goals. (PPST 4.5.2)
 MID Year

KRA 4: 10. Designed, selected, organized Quality

Assessment and used diagnostic, formative and 7%
and Reporting summative assessment strategies Efficiency
consistent with curriculum
11. Monitored and evaluated learner Quality
progress and achievement using 7%
learner attainment data. (PPST Timelines
5.2.2)
12. Communicated promptly and Quality
clearly the learners’ needs, progress 7%
and achievement to key Timelines
stakeholders, including
KRA 5: 13. Applied a personal philosophy of Quality
Personal teaching that is learner-centered. 7%
Growth and (PPST 7.1.2) Timelines
Professional
Development 14. Set professional development Quality
goals based on the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers. 7% Efficiency
(PPST 7.5.2)
Timelines
PLUS Factor 15. Performed various related Quality
works / activities that contribute to
the teaching-learning process. 2% Efficiency
Timelines

JEFFREY LOIS S. MAESTRADO MARY THESSA JUDE C. DALUPERE EPITACIO P. LAUROZA JR., PhD
Ratee Rater Approving Authority