1 Exploring - The - Relationship - Bet

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 117

EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP, PHYSICAL

ACTIVITY, AND JOB-RELATED AFFECTIVE WELL-BEING OF SELF-IDENTIFED LEADERS

By

Leo Villarreal

Dissertation
Presented to the Faculty of the Department
of Leadership Studies
Our Lady of the Lake University,
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

For the Degree of


Doctor of Philosophy
In Leadership Studies

Our Lady of the Lake University


San Antonio, Texas
April 14, 2020

____________________________ April 14, 2020


Phyllis Duncan, Ph.D. Date
Committee Chair

____________________________ April 14, 2020


Meghan Carmody-Bubb, Ph.D. Date
Committee Member

____________________________ April 14, 2020


Carol Rownd, Ph.D. Date
Committee Member
ProQuest Number: 27837648

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS


The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.

ProQuest 27837648

Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2020 ). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.

All Rights Reserved.


This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.

ProQuest LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
ABSTRACT

The importance of physical activity and fitness is well established for the physical

well-being of individuals. However, research regarding physical activity and the

mental/psychological well-being for individual is limited. Particularly, physical activity

and how it relates to leadership and affective well-being. Research shows that physical

fitness builds resiliency to better manage stress and it increases mental stamina and focus.

The purpose of this study aimed to examine the relationship between physical

activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being of self-identified leaders.

Two research models examined the relationship between physical activity and Authentic

Leadership behaviors. The second model examined the relationship between overall

Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being while controlling for physical

activity. A survey was provided and completed by 214 participants that included a

demographic survey, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire SF, Authentic

Leadership Questionnaire, and the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale. Descriptive

statistics, Pearson Product Moment Correlation, and multiple regression analysis were

used to test for significance between the independent and dependent variables.

The results of the analysis found that physical activity was a significant predictor

of Authentic Leadership transparency. Gender was also found to be a predictor the data

showed males were more transparent than females. Education was found to be a

significant predictor of Authentic Leadership Moral/Ethical behavior. Overall Authentic

Leadership showed a significant relationship with Job-related Affective Well-being.

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. iii
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vi
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vii
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................ viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... ix
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................ 1
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
Background ................................................................................................................................ 3
Statement of the Problem .......................................................................................................... 7
Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................................. 8
Conceptual Definitions .............................................................................................................. 8
Research Questions .................................................................................................................. 10
CHAPTER TWO ......................................................................................................................... 12
Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 12
Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership ......................................................................... 12
Physical Activity and Leadership ........................................................................................... 13
Authentic Leadership and Job-related Affective Well-being............................................... 15
Age and Authentic Leadership ............................................................................................... 18
Age and Leadership ................................................................................................................. 23
Gender and Authentic Leadership ......................................................................................... 24
Gender and Leadership ........................................................................................................... 27
Ethnicity and Authentic Leadership ...................................................................................... 28
Tenure and Authentic Leadership ......................................................................................... 29
Education and Authentic Leadership .................................................................................... 32
Age and Job Affective Well-being .......................................................................................... 34
Gender and Job Affective Well-being .................................................................................... 35
Ethnicity and Job Affective Well-being ................................................................................. 37
Tenure and Job Affective Well-being..................................................................................... 38

iii
iv

Education and Job Affective Well-being ............................................................................... 39


Physical Activity and Job Affective Well-being .................................................................... 40
Age and Physical Activity........................................................................................................ 43
Gender and Physical Activity ................................................................................................. 45
Ethnicity and Physical Activity............................................................................................... 48
Tenure and Physical Activity .................................................................................................. 49
Education and Physical Activity ............................................................................................. 49
CHAPTER THREE ..................................................................................................................... 51
Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 51
Overview ................................................................................................................................... 51
Sample Plan .............................................................................................................................. 51
Participants............................................................................................................................... 51
Instruments............................................................................................................................... 52
International Physical Activity Questionnaire ..................................................................... 52
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ Version 10. Self)............................................. 53
Job-related Affective Well-being (JAWS) ............................................................................ 54
Operational Definitions ........................................................................................................... 55
Research Design ....................................................................................................................... 56
Null Hypothesis (H0) ................................................................................................................ 57
Procedure .................................................................................................................................. 58
Ethical Considerations............................................................................................................. 60
CHAPTER FOUR........................................................................................................................ 61
Descriptive Statistics ................................................................................................................ 61
Demographics of Participants ................................................................................................. 61
Physical Activity Ratings ......................................................................................................... 64
Authentic Leadership Ratings ................................................................................................ 65
Job Affective Well-being Ratings ........................................................................................... 68
Multiple Regression Analysis .................................................................................................. 69
Null Hypothesis ........................................................................................................................ 74
Null Hypothesis One: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic ......... 74
Leadership Behavior Self-awareness ................................................................................. 74
Null Hypothesis Two: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic ......... 74
v

Leadership Behavior Transparency ................................................................................... 74


Null Hypothesis Three: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic ...... 77
Leadership Behavior Moral/Ethical Perspective .............................................................. 77
Null Hypothesis Four: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic ........ 78
Leadership Behavior Balanced Processing ........................................................................ 78
Null Hypothesis Five: The relationship between Overall Authentic Leadership and ... 79
Job-related Affective Well-being ........................................................................................ 79
Summary of Results ................................................................................................................. 80
CHAPTER FIVE ......................................................................................................................... 81
Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 81
Rejection of the Null Hypothesis ............................................................................................ 81
Important Findings .................................................................................................................. 82
Limitation of Study .................................................................................................................. 84
Recommendation for Future Research .................................................................................. 84
Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 85
REFRENCES ............................................................................................................................... 88
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ 100
Appendix A ............................................................................................................................. 101
OLLU Institutional Review Board Approval .................................................................. 101
Appendix B ............................................................................................................................. 102
Participant Consent Form ................................................................................................. 102
Appendix C ............................................................................................................................. 104
Permission to use International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) ...................... 104
Appendix D ............................................................................................................................. 105
Permission to use Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) ...................................... 105
Appendix E ............................................................................................................................. 106
Permission to use Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS) ................................. 106
Appendix F ............................................................................................................................. 107
Demographics Survey ........................................................................................................ 107
LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Correlation matrix of continuous variables ……………………………………70

Table 2. Modul summary for physical activity and gender on transparency ……………75

Table 3. Model summary for education on moral/ethical perspective ………………….77

Table 4. Model summary for overall Authentic Leadership on Job-related Affective Well-
being …………………………………………………………………………………….79

Table 5. Summary of Results…………………………………………………………….83

vi
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Distribution of gender of respondents…………………………………………62

Figure 2. Distribution of the age of respondents…………………………………………62

Figure 3. Distribution of the tenure of respondents……………………………………...63

Figure 4. Distribution of the level of education of respondents…………………………64

Figure 5. Distribution of the ethnicity of respondents…………………………………...64

Figure 6. Distribution of physical activity scores………………………………………..65

Figure 7. Distribution of scores on transparency subscale………………………………66

Figure 8. Distribution of cores on moral/ethical subscale………………………….……67

Figure 9. Distribution of scores on balanced processing subscale………………………67

Figure 10. Distribution of scores on self-awareness subscale………………………..…68

Figure 11. Distribution of scores on overall Authentic Leadership scale……………….68

Figure 12. Distribution of scores on Job-related Affective Well-being scale……………69

Figure 13. Bar graph of gender and transparency……………………………………….76

Figure 14. Scatter plot of physical activity and transparency……………………….......76

Figure 15. Bar graph of education and moral/ethical perspective………………………78

Figure 16. Scatter plot of overall Authentic Leadership and Job-related Affective Well-

being…………………………………………………………………………………….80

vii
DEDICATION

This dissertation is dedicated to my family for all their love and support

throughout this long adventure. To my mother for always believing in me you supported

me through the good times and the bad, you laid the foundation for me to accomplish

this. Thank you mom and I love you. To my wife, the most important person through this

adventure, thank you for all your support and for always believing in me. You always

pushed me to finish and I am grateful to you, Rocio Villarreal, I love you. Lastly, my two

boys whom I love dearly thank you for your patience and understanding and I hope you

can see that anything is possible.

viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to begin by thanking my committee chair Dr. Phyllis Duncan, for her

guidance and support throughout this process. Thank you so much Dr. Duncan for your

encouragement and inspiration to complete my dissertation and for your contribution to

my professional development. To the members of my committee Dr. Meghan A.

Carmody-Bubb and Dr. Carol Rownd thank you for your guidance and support needed to

complete this project. The both of you were patient with me in my development and the

knowledge that you both passed on to me was greatly appreciated.

To my pre-public committee Dr. Esther Chavez Gergen and Dr. Jared Montoya

thank you as well for your guidance and knowledge that propelled me to complete the

process. I also would like to thank the faculty of Our Lady of the Lake University from

the San Antonio and Rio Grande Valley campus to helped me along the way.

I wished to acknowledge and thank my colleagues in RGV Cohort 2, we

supported one another through this process and made some valuable friendships along the

way. A special thank you goes to Dr. Irma Pye Gavito for not giving up on anyone in our

cohort including me. Thank you so much Irma for your support and inspiration.

Finally, to my family and friends for always showing an interest and supporting

me through this process. I want to thank Dr. Martin (Butch) Farias my childhood friend

for pushing me to continue my education after my master’s degree and my cousin Cesar

Jesus (CJ) Gonzalez whose conversations inspired me to continue my education, I miss

you guys.

ix
CHAPTER ONE

Introduction

Physical activity is becoming more and more important these days with obesity on

the rise in children and adults’ causing medical professionals to encourage patients to

lose weight and to be more active. The United States has been experiencing a dramatic

increase in the prevalence of obesity and has become a public health crisis (Wang &

Beydoun, 2007). Sedentary lifestyles have been associated with this public health crisis

linking it to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, which is the reason the

promotion of active lifestyles has become an important public health priority (Lee,

Macfarlane, Lam, & Stewart, 2011). The Harvard Business Review published an article

comparing the stress of an athlete and that of the executive regarding the physical and

emotional demands of the hectic workweek. The article explains that in business having a

well-established foundation of physical well-being, such as vigorous exercise will clear

the way for emotional intelligence and the rest of the factors of the High-Performance

Pyramid (Loehr & Schwartz, 2001).

The Center for Disease Control (CDC) define chronic diseases as conditions that

last one year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily

living or both. Chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes are the leading

causes of death and disability in the United States. They are also leading causes of the

nation’s $3.5 trillion in annual health care costs (Center for Disease Control). Employees

that have three or more risk factors such as extremely sedentary, smoke, and drink too

much are likely to have 50% more absences from work than those employees who have

1
2

no such risk factors (Shain & Kramer, 2004). Similarly, an obesity report by the

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has estimated that

obesity is responsible for 5% to 10% of total health expenditures in the United States

(2014). The economic burden of chronic disease attributable to obesity is projected to

increase by $66 billion in the United States by 2030 (Bell, Hamer, Hees, Singh-Manoux,

Kivimaki, & Sabia, 2015)

Regular physical activity can help keep your thinking, learning, and judgment

skills sharp as you age, according to the CDC. It can also reduce your risk

of depression and anxiety and help you sleep better. Physical fitness is an important tool

to assist individuals to build resiliency towards work stress and to regenerate in the active

work environment in a healthy way (Lovelace, Manz, & Alves, 2007). Furthermore,

building resiliency through physical fitness in high demand organizations increases

stamina and mental focus to make sound decisions (Lovelace et. al., 2007). Research has

shown that exercise enhances mood by reducing anxiety and depression, and increases

feelings of vigor (Neck & Cooper, 2000).

Job well-being is an important factor for leaders that are working at becoming

resilient. Health and well-being in the workplace have become common topics in the

mainstream media (Danna & Griffin, 1999). Well-being is viewed as encompassing the

various life/non-work satisfactions, the work/job-related satisfaction, and overall general

health (1999). Subjective well-being is a multi-faceted construct that comprises of

affective and cognitive well-being (Luhman, Hawkley, Eid, &Cacioppo, 2012). Affective

well-being refers to the frequency and intensity of positive and negative emotions and

cognitive well-being refers to global evaluations of life such as marital status or life
3

satisfaction (2012). Health is a sub-component of well-being which is a combination of

mental and psychological indicators as affect, frustration, and anxiety and physical and

psychological indicators as blood pressure, heart condition, and general physical health

(Dana & Griffin, 1999).

Background

Researchers and managers recognize that leaders’ physical activity in the

workplace enhances productivity, reduces staff turnover and absenteeism, improves

health of workers, and improves moral among the staff (World Health Organization &

World Economic Forum, 2008). Physical activity has important health benefits, that

include reduce risk associated with cardiovascular disease, overweight and obesity,

hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, some cancers, osteoporosis and musculoskeletal

impairments, and depressions (Warburton, Nicol, & Bredin, 2006). In an HBO

documentary “Weight of a Nation,” Thomas Friedman from the Center of Disease

Control and Prevention described how physical activity is the wonder drug to many of

these health concerns (2012). Moreover, the former Texas Comptroller of Public

Accounts, Susan Combs, states the importance of the crisis regarding the obesity

epidemic, it will affect employees and employers and employers will not be able to make

their bottom-line business if they do not have fit employees (2012).

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum

developed a joint report as a plan or outline for companies to use, if they wish, to

promote a healthy lifestyle in the workplace. The report also states that by addressing diet

and physical activity in the workplace it has the potential to contribute to a positive and

caring image of the company, reduce sick leave, health plan costs, and workers’
4

compensation and disability payments (2008). The worksite is the best place for taking

action to prevent work related injury and disease; it is also an appropriate setting for a

broader approach to promotion and prevention; the responsibility for improving health

has to be shared by government, management, trade unions, health professionals, and the

individual worker (Schilling, 1998). Physical activity is important as fit executives are

better able to handle the enormous demands and pressures that confront them (Neck,

Mitchell, Manz, Cooper, & Thompson, 2000). Not addressing the leaders’ health and

well-being has the potential to affect leaders and followers of an organizations in

negative ways such as becoming less productive, make lower quality decisions, and be

more prone to absenteeism (Danna & Griffen, 1999).

Physical activity is imperative for an employee’s well-being in the workforce.

Affective well-being is the core dimension of employee well-being (Rahimnia &

Sharifirad, 2014). According to research affective well-being addresses both positive and

negative effects that make up the various emotions that relate to job stressors and job

affect (Danna & Griffin, 1999). Stress is highly correlated with employee health practices

and conditions hostile to well-being (Rahimnia & Sharifirad, 2014). Moreover, job

satisfaction is the key objective for an individual’s well-being as it is the positive

emotional state resulting from the appraisal of the individual’s job experience (Luhmann,

Hawkley, Eid, & Cacioppo, 2012). These complex and stressful workplaces present

challenges to organizational leaders tasked with managing while concurrently

maintaining commitment and moral (Lyons & Schneider, 2009). As a result, leaders

should practice positive emotional leadership behaviors that nurtures these positive

characteristics.
5

Research shows that leaders who engage in Authentic Leadership behaviors are

more effective at fostering worker motivation, which results in follower satisfaction with

the leader, follower job satisfaction and performance, and organizational commitment

(Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2008). Authentic Leadership is a

leader behavior theory that enhances job satisfaction and decreases stress symptoms of

employee well-being (Illies, Morgeson, & Nahrgang, 2005). Leaders that are Authentic

impact the well-being of both the leader and the follower that will assist with the high

demands of a hectic work environment (Illies, et.al., 2005). The National Institute of

Mental Health (NIMH) explains how health problems can occur if stress response goes

on for too long or becomes chronic, such as when the source of stress is constant, or if the

response continues after the danger has subsided. According to the American

Psychological Association (APA), chronic stress may cause coronary disease because of

changes in the body or overeating, smoking, and other bad habits people use to cope with

stress that results from job strain (2013). Consequently, the research shows that Authentic

Leadership theory may alleviate the stress in the work environment with the positive

behaviors.

Leadership is key to an organization and an individual to be successful.

Employees want a leader who is empathetic, positive, and someone who will believe in

them. Authentic Leadership is a theory that looks at the leaders and how followers react

to their leaders. Authentic Leadership is defined as a pattern of leader behavior that draws

upon and promotes both positive psychological capacities and a positive ethical climate,

to foster greater self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing of

information, and relational transparency on the part of leaders working with followers,
6

fostering positive self-development (Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, and

Peterson, 2008). In a study by Rahimnia and Sharifirad (2015) found that the process of

Authentic Leadership positively influences self-awareness and self-regulated positive

behaviors on the part of both leaders and followers, and it provokes positive personal

growth and self-development. Both studies formerly mentioned, as well as other

researchers, state how authentic leadership positively influences the leaders and that this

leadership trait is spread to others that the leader works with.

A study on the effects of exercise training on mood and anxiety found that aerobic

training has a favorable effect on psychological well-being. The authors conclude that

moderate exercise training is effective and has important implications for the use of

physical conditioning programs in health care (Steptoe, Edwards, Moses & Mathews,

1998). The authors also found that exercise training has been found effective in reducing

anxiety levels in non-anxious groups and women reporting stress at work and in helping

people to cope with stressful events (Steptoe et. al., 1998). Another study revealed that

those in the study who reported greater physical activity also reported less stress and

lower levels of depression (Norris, Carrol, & Cochrane, 1991). Furthermore, physical

activity and exercise training on psychological stress and well-being that subjects

undergoing high intensity exercise reported significantly less stress than subjects in the

groups that did not (Norris, et. al., 1991). A study that examined the relationship between

the intensity and duration of physical activity and subject well-being found that a 30-

minute fitness program conducted twice a week over a four-week period significantly

improved the subjects’ well-being (Wicker & Frick, 2015). Supervisors are considered as

the key individual as they can have an enormous effect, positive or negative, on
7

employee’s lives since supervisors significantly influence work demand, control and

social support (Harris and Kacmar, 2006). Therefore, it is imperative that employers

begin to look at the well-being of their leaders and what they can do to improve the work

environment.

Statement of the Problem

Leaders can often be a central source of stress among employees. Stress

originating from work is highly correlated with employee personal health practices and

conditions that are hostile to their well-being (Shain & Kramer, 2004). However, leaders

who promote supportive relationships, elicit motivation among subordinates, facilitate

more positive and less negative emotions among subordinates, and engender more benign

evaluations of stressful tasks among subordinates may be more effective than the more

traditional leaders who tend toward task-directive techniques (Lyons & Schneider, 2009).

Authentic leadership enhances job satisfaction and decreases stress and stress symptoms

of employee well-being (Rahimnia & Sharifirad, 2014). Authentic Leadership behaviors

impacts well-being on both the leader and the followers (Illies, Morgeson, Nahrgang,

2005).

Research on the relationship between physical activity, authentic leadership, and

job well-being is needed to understand the role of the organization in healthy employees.

Studies have shown a correlation between the effects of exercise training on mental well-

being (Moses et al., 1988) and the effects of physical activity on psychological stress and

well-being (Norris et al., 1991). Leaders can often be a central source of stress among

employee and yet research on Authentic Leadership and well-being is limited.

Furthermore, few studies on self-reported physical activity and Authentic Leadership


8

Behaviors exist. Finally, after an extensive search no studies could be found on the

relationship between physical activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job Affective Well-

being.

Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between leaders’ self-

rated physical activity and Authentic Leadership Behaviors. To examine the relationships

between leaders’ self-rated overall Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being

when controlling for physical activity. Thus, with no studies found on the relationship

between physical activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being this study

will add an understanding to this important and much needed research topic.

Conceptual Definitions

Physical Activity refers to any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles

that requires energy expenditure–including activities undertaken while working, playing,

carrying out household chores, traveling, and engaging in recreational pursuits (World

Health Organization, 2015).

International Physical Activity Questionnaire is an instrument developed by

International Consensus Group to establish a standardized and culturally adaptable

measurement tool to assess the levels of habitual Physical Activity for individuals (Kim,

Park, & Kang, 2012).

Authentic Leadership is defined as a pattern of leader behavior that draws upon

and promotes both positive psychological capacities and a positive ethical climate, to

foster greater self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing of


9

information, and relational transparency on the part of leaders working with followers,

fostering positive self-development (Walumbwa, et al., 2008).

Self-Awareness refers to demonstrating an understanding of how one derives and

makes meaning of the world and how that meaning making process impacts the way one

views himself or herself over time (Walumbwa, et al., 2008).

Transparency refers to presenting one’s authentic self, as opposed to a fake or

distorted self, to others. Such behavior promotes trust through disclosures that involve

openly sharing information and expressions of one’s true thoughts and feelings while

trying to minimize displays of inappropriate emotions (Walumbwa, et al., 2008).

Balanced Processing refers to leaders who show that they objectively analyze all

relevant data before coming to a decision (Walumbwa, et al., 2008).

Moral/Ethical Perspective refers to an internationalized and integrated form of

self-regulation. This sort of self-regulation is guided by internal moral standards and

values versus group, organizational, and societal pressures, and it results in expressed

decision making and behavior that is consistent with these internalized values

(Walumbwa, et al., 2008).

Job-Related Affective Well-Being (JAWS) is an instrument developed to assess

both positive and negative emotional reactions a job makes one feel (Van Katwyk,

Spector, Fox, & Kelloway, 2000).

Well-being refers to a multi-faceted construct comprising affective and cognitive

components (Luhmann, Hawkley, Eid, & Cacioppo, 2012).

Affective Well-being refers to the frequency and intensity of positive and

negative emotions and mood (Luhmann, Hawkley, Eid, & Cacioppo, 2012).
10

Age refers to the length of time in completed years that the leader has lived (U.S.

Census Bureau, 2018).

Gender refers to the social construction whereby a society or culture assigns

certain tendencies or behaviors the labels of masculine or feminine (U.S. Census Bureau,

2018).

Ethnicity refers to the leader’s self-identification of their origin or descent,

“roots,” heritage, or place where the leader or his/her parents or ancestors were born

(U.S. Census Bureau, 2018).

Tenure refers to the distinctive years in current job position (U.S. Census Bureau,

2018).

Education refers to the highest level of education that the leader has completed

(U.S. Census Bureau, 2018).

Research Questions

RQ 1: Is there a relationship between physical activity and authentic leadership behavior

(self-awareness) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender, ethnicity,

tenure, and education.

RQ 2: Is there a relationship between physical activity and authentic leadership behavior

(transparency) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender, ethnicity,

tenure, and education.

RQ 3: Is there a relationship between physical activity authentic leadership behavior

(moral/ethical perspective) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.


11

RQ 4: Is there a relationship between physical activity and authentic leadership behavior

(balanced processing) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

RQ 5: Is there a relationship between overall authentic leadership behavior and job-

related affective well-being of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.


CHAPTER TWO

Literature Review

The following is a review of the research that is related to the current study. This

review of literature section will address the independent variable physical activity and

dependent variable Authentic Leadership Behaviors of self-awareness, transparency,

moral/ethical perspective and balanced processing. The control variables for the first

research model are age, gender, tenure, ethnicity, and education level. The next segment

of the research will address the second research model of the independent variable overall

Authentic Leadership and the dependent variable job affective well-being and adding

physical activity as a control variable.

Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Ruiz (2017) conducted a study exploring the relationship of physical activity,

Authentic Leadership Behaviors, and Emotional Intelligence. The Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire, the Shutte Emotional Intelligence Test, and the International Physical

Activity Questionnaire were administered to a sample size of 281 participants. The

dependent variable are Authentic Leadership and the four components: Transparency,

Moral/Ethical, Self-Awareness, and Balanced Processing. The independent variables

were Emotional Intelligence and physical activity. Control variables included age,

gender, years of work experience, education and organization. A multiple regression

analysis was conducted to determine if independent variables are predictive of dependent

variables. Other statistical analysis used were Pearson correlation, Analysis of Variance

(ANOVA), and Sheffe post hoc test. Years of work experience (R2 = .026, β = .162, p <
12
13

.05), managing others’ emotions (ΔR2 = .192, β = .438, rp = .444, p < .05) and managing

own emotions (ΔR2 = .023, β = .186, rp = .173, p < .05) were all significant predictors of

Authentic Leadership component Self-awareness. Work experience (R2 = .052, β = .229,

p < .05), Organization (ΔR2 = .038, β = -.037, rp = -.032, p < .05) F(5,275) = 3.23, (p <

.05), managing own emotions (ΔR2 = .015, β = .149, rp = .131, p < .05), managing others’

emotions (ΔR2 = .056, β = .240, rp = .248, p < .05), and physical activity (ΔR2 = .013, β =

-.122, rp = -.125, p < .05) were all significant predictors of Authentic Leadership

component balanced processing. Years of work experience (R2 = .073, β = .270, p < .05),

managing others’ emotions (ΔR2 = .109, β = .330, rp = .343, p < .05) and managing own

emotions (ΔR2 = .011, β = .130, rp = .118, p < .05) were all significant predictors of

Authentic Leadership component transparency. Work experience (R2 = .073, β = .270, p

< .05), organization (ΔR2 = .049, β = .064, rp = .059, p < .05) F(5,275) = 6.29 (p < .05),

managing own emotions (ΔR2 = .013, β = .139, rp = .134, p < .05), managing others’

emotions (ΔR2 = .097, β = .315, rp = .246, p < .05), and physical activity (ΔR2 = .011, β

= -.112, rp = -.126, p < .05) were all significant predictors of Authentic Leadership

component moral/ethical.

Physical Activity and Leadership

In a 2002 study, McDowell-Larsen, Kearney, and Campbell administered the

Executive Success Profile (ESP) and the Campbell Leadership Index (CLI) along with a

health and physical activity questionnaire to 600 senior level executives attending the

Leadership at the Peak, a five-day course at the Center for Creative Leadership. The

executives completed a health and physical activity questionnaire before arriving, after
14

they arrived fitness professionals collected additional data such as percent body fat,

blood-pressure, and exercise routine. The data was then compared with the results of the

ESP and the CLI, which required a self-assessment along with parallel ratings by an

observer group of bosses, subordinates, and peers. The ratings by direct reports on the

ESP scale rated the exercisers significantly higher (p < .05) on 32% (7/22) of the scales.

The average of all the scales was also significantly higher for the exercisers. Peers rated

exercisers higher on 12 out of 22 scales (55%). There were no differences between

exercisers and non-exercisers when the bosses rated the executives. The CLI scales all

were combined to make up the leadership orientation score were significantly higher for

the exercisers (p < .05) than for the non-exercisers.

A study by Kiser and Clayton in 2018, administered a self-reporting 22 item

survey that was administered through survey monkey to 120 principals. The principals

were sent a survey via e-mail that was distributed by the Center for Education

Improvement (CEI). Many of the participants (66%) were female (n = 73) and 34% were

male (n = 38), nine participants chose not to answer that question. A chi square statistic

was not significant (p = .155) for the number of days physically active, however it was

for the amount of time physically active (p = .001). A McNemar’s test was used to test

the amount of aerobic physical activity and found that the amount of physical activity

changed after becoming principals (p = .010) as did the amount of time (p = .0001).

Exploratory data showed that principals who engage in the recommended amount of

aerobic physical activity report experiencing lower levels of stress (M = 2.57, SD = .52, n

= 37) than principals that did not engage in the recommended amount (M = 2.96, SD =
15

.70, n = 69). A significant difference t(93.451) = 3.386, p = .001, and represented a

medium sized d = .33.

In 2007, Lovelace, Manz, and Alves examined literature on work stress, physical

fitness, the flow of managing demands, increasing job control, and leadership. The

authors looked at leaders work environment, their job demands and the control these

leaders have, and the amount of physical fitness leaders’ practice. The authors determined

that outcomes of high-strain work environments on leader health were an increased risk

of disease and psychological strain. It was proposed that leaders could achieve healthful

regeneration through physical fitness and that by practicing self-leadership strategies

leaders could achieve higher levels of physical fitness.

In another review of literature by Neck, Mitchell, Manz, Cooper, and Thompson

in 2000, describe the importance of fitness for top ranking executive leaders. The article

discusses how fitness can contribute to stamina, mental clarity, ability to cope with stress

and a variety of other factors that can affect an executive’s ability to lead. The study

supported this premise by looking at research studies and actual accounts of top

executives from a variety of business organizations. The authors found that leaders who

are fit are better able to handle the enormous demands and pressures that confront them

the endless meetings, grueling travel schedules, high pressure, and stress.

Authentic Leadership and Job-related Affective Well-being

A 2016 meta-analysis by Banks, McCauley, Gardner, and Guler (k = 100, N =

25,452) was to compare Authentic Leadership and Transformational Leadership theories

for redundancy. The estimate of the true score mean correlation was used between

Authentic Leadership and Transformational Leadership found (k = 23, N = 5,414, rho =


16

.72) a strong overlap between the two leadership theories. Also, the study found a strong

relationship with Authentic Leadership and group or organizational performance. Job

satisfaction (k = 16, N = 4,084, rho = .53), follower satisfaction with leader (k = 6, N =

1,318, rho = .66), organization performance (k = 4, N = 333, rho = .40), Leader-rated

effectiveness (k = 7, N = 1,413, rho = .58), task performance (k = 9, N = 2,054, rho =

.14), organization citizenship behavior (k = 10, N = 2,309, rho = .48), organizational

commitment (k = 17, N = 4,077, p (rho) = .51), and counterproductive work behaviors (k

= 3, N = 1,549, p (rho) = -.31) are all strongly correlated with Authentic Leadership.

In another related meta-analysis in 2016, by Hock, Bommer, Dulebohn, and Wu

examined a number of organizationally relevant measures in the comparison of Authentic

Leadership with Transformational Leadership. The nine measures of job performance (k

= 8, N = 2,101, rho = .12), organizational citizenship behavior (k = 8, N = 1,256, rho =

.33), employee deviance (k = 4, N = 1,175, rho = -.25), job satisfaction (k = 9, N = 2,129,

rho = .48), organization commitment (k = 5, N = 797, rho = .48), empowerment (k = 4, N

= 1,117, rho = .52), psychological capital (k = 7, N = 2,236, rho = .53), moral identity (k

= 4, N = 578, rho = .45), and trust in manager (k = 6, N = 929, rho = .69) were found to

be highly correlated with Authentic Leadership. The relationship across the nine common

measures were about the same for Transformational Leadership which shows the two

leadership styles highly correlated with each other.

A study in 20014, by Nelson, Boudrias, Brunet, Morin, De Civita, Savoie, and

Alderson administered self-reported questionnaires Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

(ALQ), a 17-item scale to access the perception of work climate, and a 25-item validated

scale assessed psychological well-being at work to 406 nurses. The purpose of the
17

research aims to deepen the understanding of psychological well-being among nurses by

assessing the role of both Authentic Leadership and work climate. A time-lagged study

design was employed to determine the mediational role of work climate in explaining the

impact of Authentic Leadership. This study used correlational analysis to verify the

associations between the socio demographic variables and variables of the model.

Education was found to be positively related to Authentic Leadership (r = .10, p < .05),

and work climate (r = .12, p < .05). Number of hours work per week was negatively

related to psychological well-being (r = .18, p < .05), frequency of contact with the

supervisor is positively related to Authentic Leadership (r = .24, p < .05), and work

climate (r = .10, p < .05). ANOVA analysis was used to verify associations between

categorical variables and variables of the model. The results of the ANOVA show two

statistically significant differences, the first in work climate and employment status F(2,

403) = 6.35, p < .05 with nurses working full time (M = 4.64) better perceive their work

climate than nurses working part time (M = 4.29). The second difference is work climate

and work shift F(2, 403) = 6.35, p < .05 nurses working the day shift (M = 4.61) better

perceive their work climate than nurses working the evening shift (M = 4.32). The

findings indicate that Authentic Leadership impacts the work climate in a positive

manner thereby, increasing levels of psychological well-being at work.

Illies, Morgeson, and Nahrang (2005) in a literature review examined the concept

of Authentic Leadership and the influences of authenticity on leader and follower and

follower well-being. The framework linking Authentic Leadership components and

follower well-being that were proposed in this review of literature found a positive

contribution to the theoretical development of Authentic Leadership. One was how it


18

anchors the concept in historical philosophical approaches to psychological well-being

and links to the larger psychological and positive organization movements. A conceptual

model was used to define Authentic Leadership as a four-component construct which

complements other work that has examined the concept and process Authentic

Leadership and how it is able to positively influence the well-being of followers.

Age and Authentic Leadership

Stone (2015) administered the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for self-esteem, the

Internal Control Index for locus of control, and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

for leadership to 562 veterinarians. The statistical analysis of the collected data included

Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t-test, multiple regression, ANOVA, and Sheffe post

hoc. The study of veterinarians found that age was a significant predictor of three

Authentic Leadership scales. The older the veterinarians the higher rated higher on

Transparency (R2 = .31, β = .175) Balanced Processing (R2 = .022, β = .148, rp = .149),

and Moral/Ethical conduct (R2 = .011, β = .104, rp = .104).

Rodriguez (2016) administered the Shutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test

and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 254 self-identified leaders. Descriptive

statistics were used to establish the characteristics of the participants, Multiple

Regression analysis used to explain variance that included further analysis if significant

using beta weight and partial correlation. A t-test used for dichotomous variables for

significant findings with categorical variables. The age distribution of the respondents

ranged from 21 to 64, with an average mean of 38.61 years and a standard deviation of

11.77 years. The results indicated that age was significant predictor of Ethical/Moral
19

Perspective. Age explained 1.9% of the total variance (R2 = .019, β = .137, p < .05) the

older the leader the higher the leader self-rated on Ethical/Moral Perspective.

Teaff (2014) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, the Moral

Foundations Questionnaire, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale to 130 participants. The

study examined political ideology, moral reasoning, and Authentic Leadership behaviors.

Regression analysis was used to determine predictable relationship exists between

political ideology, moral reasoning and Authentic Leadership. Descriptive statistics was

used for demographic survey, t-test used to determine if political ideology in the study is

a fair representation of the normative sample in US, Pearson Correlation used on data to

further examine relationship between variables. The regression analysis revealed that age,

ranging from 22 to 68 years (M = 41.09, SD = 11.317), was found to be a significant

predictor of Authentic Leadership with an additional 3% of variance explained (R2 =

.129, ΔR2 = .030, p < .05). The findings revealed that the older the individual, the higher

the Authentic Leadership scores (β = .315, rp = .327, p < .05).

A study in 2015, Corner, administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

and the Psychological Capital Questionnaire to 147 secondary school principals. The

study examined the principal’s psychological capital and measured the principal’s

Authentic Leadership behavior. The sample had a wide range of ages with 5.26% of the

sample less than 35 years old, 23.03% of the sample over the age of 54, and over 1/3 of

the sample between the ages of 40 and 49 years. One-way Analysis of Variance

(ANOVA) was performed to test the mean differences among the variables. Age revealed

significant difference in Authentic Leadership four subscales. Post hoc test conducted
20

using Turkey HSD revealed that the less than 35 group (M = 13.43, SD = 3.31) rated

significantly lower in transparency than the 45-49 group (M = 16.39, SD = 2.04), 50-54

group (M = 16.23, SD = 1.80), and 54+ group (M = 17.54, SD = 1.56). In overall

authentic leadership, less than 35-year-old principals were significantly lower (M =

46.00, SD =8.33) than 45-49-year-old principals (M = 54.36, SD = 4.42), 50-54-year-old

principals (M = 53.38, SD = 3.92), and more than 54-year-old principals (M = 56.46,

SD = 4.38). The over 54-year-old principals were also significantly higher in

transparency (M = 17.54, SD = 1.56) than 35-39-year-old principals (M = 15.00, SD =

2.81). Additionally, over 54-year-old principals were significantly higher in self-

awareness (M = 10.06, SD = 1.26) than less than 35-year-old principals (M = 8.00, SD =

1.83) and 40-44-year-old principals (M = 8.96, SD = 1.48). In the subscale of balanced

processing, both the over 54 year old principals (M = 13.89, SD = 1.66) as well as the 45-

49-year-old principals (M = 13.54, SD = 1.73) were significantly higher than the less than

35-year-old principals (M = 11.29, SD = 2.36).

Prestol-Puesan (2014) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to

147 financial leaders. The self-report on Authentic Leadership consisted of 35 males and

10 females. The ages range was from their 30s to their 70s, with 71% of them in age

groups ranging from 50 to 69 years of age. The canonical correlation analysis tested the

associations between Authentic Leadership subscales and the participant’s characteristics

(age, gender, tenure, and education) revealed a significant relationship using the Wilk’s 𝜆

= .446 criterion, F(20, 120) = 1.65), p = .051, Rc = 581, Rc2 = .338, and RI = .175. The

findings indicate that the age (.428) was a strong predictor of Authentic Leadership and

included transparency (.36) and moral/ethical perspective (.62) of the subscales.


21

The following ten studies found no significant relationship between age and

Authentic Leadership. Beginning with Ruiz (2017) administered the Authentic

Leadership Questionnaire, the Shutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test, and the

International Physical Activity Questionnaire to 281 participants. Respondents ages

ranged from 18 to 81, with a mean of 39.73. Multiple regression revealed no significance

with Authentic Leadership or any of the four behaviors.

Lopez (2015 administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and the

Charismatic/Value based leadership adapted from GLOBE research survey. The 147

respondents self-reported age ranged from 22 to 61, with a mean age of 38.22, and a

median age of 37. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed to determine correlations

between significant continuous variable and the dependent variables. No statistical

significance was found among age and Authentic Leadership.

Cerne, Jaklic, and Skerlavai, (2013) administered the Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire to 289 participants from a manufacturing and processing company in

Slovenia. A translation/back-translation procedure was used to translate the questionnaire

from English to Slovenian and back to English. Pearson product-moments correlation

was conducted, and no significant difference was found between age and self-ascribed

Authentic Leadership.

Azanza, Moriano, and Molero (2013) administered the Spanish version of the

FOCUS 93 Questionnaire and the 13 item Spanish adaptation of the Authentic

Leadership Questionnaire to 571 participants. In this sample, 53.8% of the participants

were female, the average age was 35.62 years (SD = 8.61), and the average seniority was

7.85 years (SD = 7.32); 41.7% of participants had a college degree and 21.9% were
22

graduated from vocational school. Pearson correlations was conducted and found no

significant difference between age and Authentic Leadership.

Sendjaya, Pekerti, Hirst, Hartel, and Butarbutar (2016) administered the Authentic

Leadership Questionnaire and the Machiavellianism Personality Scale to 70 respondents.

The respondents were 42 (60%) male and 28 (40%) female, ages ranged from 31 – 40

years old (52.90%), and 41 – 50 years old (28.60%). Zero order correlations and

regression analysis examined independent variables, dependent variables, and control

variables found no significance with age and Authentic Leadership.

Nielson, (2013) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Negative

Acts Questionnaire Revised, Global Transformational Leadership Scale, Multifactor

Leadership Questionnaire and the Norwegian offshore risk and safety climate inventory

to 594 participants from two large Norwegian shipping companies. The respondents were

588 males (99%) and 6 females (1%), the range for age was 18 to 63 with a mean of 40.4

years (SD = 10.0). Pearson’s r used to examine the relationship found a negative

correlation between age and Authentic Leadership (r = -.18, p < .01, 2-tailed) that

indicates younger participants rated higher on Authentic Leadership.

Toor and Ofori (2009) administer The Authenticity Inventory (AI:3) a self-report

45-item scale, Ryff’s psychological well-being scale, 15-item Contingent Self-Esteem

Scale to 32 leaders from the construction industry in Singapore. Data was analyzed using

t-test, ANOVA, correlations analysis and regression. Participants age were as follows less

than 30 years old, 31 – 40 years old, 41 – 50 years old, and 51 – 60 years old with a mean

age was 42.45. An analysis of variance was used to examine age and Authentic

Leadership and found no significant association.


23

Gatling, Castelli, and Cole (2013) administered the Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire to 96 participants, age ranged 30 – 49 years old and 50+ years old with

32% being 31 and 68% 65 years of age. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis found

no significant relationship between age and Authentic Leadership.

Gatling (2014) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 96

business coaches to investigate the effectiveness of coaching. An analysis of variance

found no difference in the scores between age and Authentic Leadership.

Beyer (2010) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 75

participants that consisted from sample population of junior Wisconsin Army National

guard officers. A convenience sample was taken of the officers using voluntary data on

their authenticity. Descriptive statistics generated mean, minimum and maximum values

and the standard deviation and variation between constructs was determined using an

ANOVA analysis. Age ranged from 18 – 21 years, 21 – 24 years, 25 – 28 years, 28 – 31

years, and 31+ years. A one-way analysis of variance found no significant relationship

between age and Authentic Leadership subscales.

Age and Leadership

Sessa, Kabacoff, Deal, and Brown (2007) administered a 360-degree evaluation

process called Leadership 360 (Management Research Group, 1992) to 20,640 business

professionals. Of the total sample, 2,440 were born between 1925 and 1945 (Silent),

6,631 were born between 1946 and 1954 (Early Boomers), 7,722 were born between

1955 and 1963 (Late Boomers), and 3,847 were born between 1964 and 1982 (Gen-

Xers). The canonical variate ranked the cohorts in order from Silents (-.570), Early

Boomers (-.230), Late Boomers (.113), and Xers (.532) with roughly equal spacing
24

between each group. The analysis found that younger leaders tended to perceive

themselves and be perceived by others to utilize the more individual leadership style

whereas older leaders tended to perceive themselves and be perceived by others to utilize

a more consensual leadership style, with middle age leaders falling somewhere in

between.

Gender and Authentic Leadership

Beyer (2010) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 75

participants that consisted from sample population of junior Wisconsin Army National

guard officers. A convenience sample was taken of the officers using voluntary data on

their authenticity. Descriptive statistics generated mean, minimum and maximum values

and the standard deviation and variation between constructs was determined using an

ANOVA analysis. Age ranged from 18 – 21 years, 21 – 24 years, 25 – 28 years, 28 – 31

years, and 31+ years. Males made up 78.3% of the respondents and females made up

22.7%. A one-way analysis of variance demonstrated significance at the p < .05 level

between gender and balanced processing F(1, 67) = 6.160, p = .016. A Turkey HSD Post

Hoc test was performed to quantify the specific relationships within the independent

variables found gender variables demonstrated a tend for males (M = 4.28, 95% CI [4.15,

4.41]) to have a greater level of balanced processing than females (M = 3.91, 95% CI

[3.55, 4.27]).

A study in 2016, Rodriguez administered the Shutte Self Report Emotional

Intelligence Test and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 254 self-identified

leaders. Descriptive statistics were used to establish the characteristics of the participants,

Multiple Regression analysis used to explain variance that included further analysis if
25

significant using beta weight and partial correlation. A t-test used for dichotomous

variables for significant findings with categorical variables. Males made up 40% (102) of

the respondents and females made up 60% (152) of the respondents who completed the

survey. Results indicate gender was a significant predictor of balanced processing with

3.2% of the variance explained (R2 = .032, p < .05). A t-test between males and

females revealed males self-rated higher than females on balanced processing, t(252) =

2.867, p < .05.

Stone (2015) administered the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for self-esteem, the

Internal Control Index for locus of control, and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

for leadership to 562 veterinarians. The statistical analysis of the collected data included

Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t-test, multiple regression, ANOVA, and Sheffe post

hoc. The study of veterinarians found that gender was a significant predictor of two

Authentic Leadership scales. Gender was 7% of the variance explained (ΔR2 = .007, p <

.05). A t-test found that females rated higher in transparency than males, t(526) = 12.78, p

< .05. The other finding with gender was a significance of moral/ethical perspective

accounting for an additional 1.1% of the variance explained (ΔR2 = .011, p < .05) a t-test

revealed that females rated higher on moral ethical perspective than males t(526) = 13.31,

p < .05.

Jasso (2016) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and the

Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test to 493 first time college students. The

study examined the relationship among Authentic Leadership, emotional intelligence,

student success, and control variables that included gender. The respondent’s gender

were 292 females (59.23%) and 201 males (40.77%). The study used multiple regression
26

analysis to determine the relationships of variables. Multiple regression analysis found

that gender accounted for an additional .9% of the total variance (ΔR2 = .009, p < .05). A

t-test revealed t(491) = 2.483, p < .05, that female participants (M = 3.14) have a

statistically significantly higher mean score on self-awareness than male participants (M

= 3.00, p < .05). Gender accounted for an additional .9% of the total variance (ΔR2 =

.009, p < .05). A t-test revealed t(491) = 2.160, p < .05 shows that female participants (M

= 3.21) have a statistically significantly higher mean score on ethical/moral behavior than

male participants (M = 3.09) (p < .05).

The following three studies found that gender was not a predictor of Authentic

Leadership. Peterson (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire,

Concise Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-

Short Form, and the Short Profile of Emotional Competences to 350 participants. The

purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to assess the relationship between the

characteristics of authentic leadership and three variables: physical activity, mindfulness,

and emotional competence. Participant response by gender was male 189 (54%) and

female 161 (46%). A one way analysis of variance revealed that gender was not

significant with Authentic Leadership.

Ruiz (2017) conducted a study exploring the relationship of physical activity,

Authentic Leadership Behaviors, and Emotional Intelligence. The Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire, the Shutte Emotional Intelligence Test, and the International Physical

Activity Questionnaire were administered to a sample size of 281 participants. The

dependent variable are Authentic Leadership and the four components: Transparency,

Moral/Ethical, Self-Awareness, and Balanced Processing. The independent variables


27

were Emotional Intelligence and physical activity. Control variables included age,

gender, years of work experience, education and organization. A multiple regression

analysis was conducted to determine if independent variables are predictive of dependent

variables. Other statistical analysis used were Pearson correlation, Analysis of Variance

(ANOVA), and Sheffe post hoc test. The results found no significant difference with

gender and Authentic Leadership.

Tate (2008) administered a self-report 18 item Authentic Leadership scale based

on George’s (2003) five dimensions of Authentic Leadership and a Self-Monitoring Scale

to 69 participants. Correlational analysis shows that gender was not a significant

predictor of Authentic Leadership (r = .02, p > .05).

Gender and Leadership

A meta-analysis by Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, and van Egan (2003) was

conducted to address the issues of gender and leadership styles (k = 44, N = 29,874). A

quantitative synthesis of studies that had compared men and women on measures of

transformation, transactional, and laissez-faire styles. Hedges g and Cohen’s d was used

for effect size Eagly et. al. followed (Hedges and Olkin’s) procedures where gs were

converted to ds by correcting them for bias, and each d was weighted by the reciprocal of

its variance in the analysis. Examination of the mean weighted effect sizes shows that, by

this standard of statistical significance, female leaders were more transformation than male

leaders in their leadership style. On transactional leadership, female leaders scored higher

than male leaders on the first subscale, contingent reward. However, male leaders scored

higher than female leaders on the management by exception (active) and management by

exception (passive) subscales of transactional leadership. Idealized influence (attribute) d+


28

= -.12; Idealized influence (behavior) d+ = -.02; Inspirational motivation d+ = -.05;

Intellectual stimulation d+ = -.05; and Individualized consideration d+ = -.19. Results for

transactional leadership were mixed Females scored higher on contingent reward d+ = -

.13; men scored higher on management by exception active d+ = 12 and passive d+ = .27.

Ethnicity and Authentic Leadership

Stone (2015) administered the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for self-esteem, the

Internal Control Index for locus of control, and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

for leadership to 562 veterinarians. The statistical analysis of the collected data included

Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t-test, multiple regression, ANOVA, and Sheffe post

hoc. The study of veterinarians found ethnicity was a significant predictor of two

Authentic Leadership behaviors. The first significant predictor transparency accounted

for 1.3% of the variance explained (ΔR2 = .013, p < .05). A t-test found that non-Whites

scored higher in transparency than Whites, t(526) = 5.01, p < .05. The second, ethnicity

was a significant predictor of balanced processing accounting for 1.9% of the variance

explained (ΔR2 = .019, p < .05). A t-test revealed that non-Whites scored higher on

balanced processing than Whites t(526) = 5.0, p < .05.

Jasso (2016) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and the

Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test to 493 first time college students. The

study examined the relationship among Authentic Leadership, emotional intelligence,

student success, and control variables that included gender. The respondent’s ethnicity

was 14 American Indian or Alaskan Native, 19 Asian, 37 Black or African American,

320 Hispanic or Latino, and 103 White. The study used multiple regression analysis to
29

determine the relationships of variables. Multiple regression analysis found that ethnicity

was not a significant predictor of Authentic Leadership.

A study in 2016, Rodriguez administered the Shutte Self Report Emotional

Intelligence Test and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 254 self-identified

leaders. Descriptive statistics were used to establish the characteristics of the participants,

Multiple Regression analysis used to explain variance that included further analysis if

significant using beta weight and partial correlation. A t-test used for dichotomous

variables for significant findings with categorical variables. The respondent’s ethnicity

was 218 Hispanic and 36 non-Hispanic (30 White/non-Hispanic, 1 Black/African

American, and 5 Asian or Pacific Islander). No significant predictor was found between

ethnicity and Authentic Leadership.

Peterson (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Concise

Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form,

and the Short Profile of Emotional Competences to 350 participants. The purpose of this

quantitative correlational study was to assess the relationship between the characteristics

of Authentic Leadership and three variables: physical activity, mindfulness, and

emotional competence. Participant response by ethnicity was White 264 (75.4%),

Hispanic 31 (8.9%), African American 31 (8.9%), Asian or Pacific 15 (4.3%), Native

American 2 (.6%), Other 1 (.3%), and 6 (1.7%) declined to answer. A one-way analysis

of variance revealed a difference with ethnicity and Authentic Leadership F(20, 329) =

1.25, p = .08.

Tenure and Authentic Leadership


30

Stone (2015) administered the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for self-esteem, the

Internal Control Index for locus of control, and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire

for leadership to 562 veterinarians. The statistical analysis of the collected data included

Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t-test, multiple regression, ANOVA, and Sheffe post

hoc. No relationship was found between tenure and Authentic Leadership.

Peterson (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Concise

Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form,

and the Short Profile of Emotional Competences to 350 participants. The purpose of this

quantitative correlational study was to assess the relationship between the characteristics

of Authentic Leadership and three variables: physical activity, mindfulness, and

emotional competence. A one-way ANOVA found no significant difference with tenure

and Authentic Leadership.

Ruiz (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, the Shutte

Emotional Intelligence Test, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to 281

participants. The study examined the relationship of physical activity, Authentic

Leadership Behaviors, and Emotional Intelligence. A multiple regression analysis was

conducted to determine if independent variables are predictive of dependent variables.

Other statistical analysis used were Pearson correlation, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA),

and Sheffe post hoc test. The results found work experience (tenure) predicted 2.6% of

the total variance (R2 = .26, β = .162, p < .05). The correlation shows that the more work

experiences the participants had, the higher they scored on Authentic Leadership scale

Self-Awareness.
31

Rodriguez (2016) administered the Shutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test

and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 254 self-identified leaders. Descriptive

statistics were used to establish the characteristics of the participants, Multiple

Regression analysis used to explain variance that included further analysis if significant

using beta weight and partial correlation. A t-test used for dichotomous variables for

significant findings with categorical variables. The respondent’s tenure mean score was

9.08 years with a standard deviation of 8.10 years. Results indicate tenure explained 3.0%

of the total variance (R2 = .030, β = .162, p < .05). The greater number of years

participants have worked for their current employer the higher they self-rated on

transparency.

Ng and Feldman (2013) conducted a meta-analysis that included 98 empirical

studies (k = 98, N = 15,932) to examine the relationship of age and organizational tenure

with the generation, dissemination, and implementation of new ideas. Detailed

information about the organizational tenure of samples, the average was 7.8 years, with a

range from 2.5 to 19 years of service. A breakdown of the distribution of mean tenure

across samples is as follows: <5 years (k = 23), between 5 and 10 years (k = 24), and

more than 0 years (k = 18). Meta-analysis techniques used in the study was to correct the

observed correlations between tenure and innovation-related behavior (IRB) for

measurement error variance because of various studies measured IRB with different

scales, a diattenuation process was needed to adjust for different levels of measurement

error variance. The weighted mean corrected correlation of effect sizes for relationship

between tenure and IRB found that <5 years of tenure (rc = .29); 5 – 10 years od tenure

(rc = .23); and more than 10 years of tenure (rc = -.01). The lack of significant
32

relationships of tenure with Innovative-related behavior suggests that older and longer

tenured workers are capable of contributing as effectively as younger more junior

employees to innovative-related activities.

Education and Authentic Leadership

All Studies without significance

Lopez (2015) study revealed no significant relationship between education level

(90 participants earned a Bachelors, 56 participants earned a Masters, and 1 earned a

PhD) and Authentic Leadership after performing a correlation analysis.

Teaf (2014) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, the Moral

Foundations Questionnaire, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale to 130 participants.

Regression analysis was used to determine predictable relationship exists between

political ideology, moral reasoning and Authentic Leadership. Descriptive statistics was

used for demographic survey, t-test used to determine if political ideology in the study is

a fair representation of the normative sample in US, Pearson Correlation used on data to

further examine relationship between variables. The regression analysis revealed

education was not a significant predictor of Authentic Leadership.

Ruiz (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, the Shutte

Emotional Intelligence Test, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to 281

participants. There were 110 respondents that did not competed a bachelor’s degree, 71

competed a bachelor’s degree, 100 respondents had obtained a graduate degree or a Ph.D.

The study examined the relationship of physical activity, Authentic Leadership

Behaviors, and Emotional Intelligence. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to


33

determine if independent variables are predictive of dependent variables. Correlation

analysis revealed no significant predictor between education and Authentic Leadership.

Peterson (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Concise

Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form,

and the Short Profile of Emotional Competences to 350 participants. The purpose of this

quantitative correlational study was to assess the relationship between the characteristics

of Authentic Leadership and three variables: physical activity, mindfulness, and

emotional competence. A one-way ANOVA found no significant difference with

education and Authentic Leadership.

Rodriguez (2016) administered the Shutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test

and the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 254 self-identified leaders. There were 72

respondents with a high school or less education, 42 with an associate’s education, 84

with a bachelor’s education, and 56 with a graduate education. Descriptive statistics were

used to establish the characteristics of the participants, Multiple Regression analysis used

to explain variance. Correlation analysis revealed no significant predictor between

education and Authentic Leadership.

Azanza, et al. (2013) administered the Spanish version of the FOCUS 93

Questionnaire and the 13 item Spanish adaptation of the Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire to 571 participants, 41.7% of participants had a college degree and 21.9%

were graduated from vocational school. Pearson correlations was conducted and found no

significance between education level attained and Authentic Leadership.

Sendjaya et. al. (2016) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and

the Machiavellianism Personality Scale to 70 respondents. Zero order correlations and


34

regression analysis examined independent variables, dependent variables, and control

variables found no significance with education and Authentic Leadership.

Gatling et. al (2013) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 96

participants. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis found no significant relationship

between education and Authentic Leadership.

Gatling (2014) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire to 96

business coaches to investigate the effectiveness of coaching. An analysis of variance

found no difference in the scores between education and Authentic Leadership.

Corner (2015) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire and the

Psychological Capital Questionnaire to 152 secondary school principals. The study

examined the principal’s psychological capital and measured the principal’s Authentic

Leadership behavior. Education was divided into two groups master’s degree 126

(82.89%) and doctoral degree 26 (17.11%). One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

was performed to test the mean differences among the variables and found no significant

difference between education level and Authentic Leadership.

Age and Job Affective Well-being

In a 2012 study, Grant and Kinman administered the Shutte Self-Report Emotional

Intelligence Test (SSEIT), Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS), Interpersonal

Reactivity Index (IRI), Social Support Questionnaire, Resilience Scale (RS), General

Health Questionnaire (GHQ – 12) to 240 participants. Correlations test was run, and all

were found significant. participants rated themselves (Self-Raters). This study looked at

undergraduate social work students and that the younger generation ready to go into the

workforce will need to practice resilience and well-being to handle the stress of what is to
35

come. Analysis of the data revealed a strong need for interventions to enhance resilience

and well-being (p < .001) as high levels of psychological distress compared to

community and occupational norms were found amongst the trainee social workers that

were surveyed.

In a 1978 study Warr administered survey questions on positive and negative

affect, anxiety levels, and feelings about present life to 1,655 participants. The age

distribution was under 25 years 7%, 25 to 34 years 17%, 35 to 44 years 19%, 45 to 54

years 25%, and 55years and above 31%. An Analysis of variance indicated a significant

difference in well-being with employment position is for the middle-aged group and the

youngest group under 25 age group (p < .001). Members of the 45 – 54 age group who

are unemployed tend to have particularly low well-being scores.

Collins, Stewart, Coffey, Margaret, and Morris (2010) administered an eighty-

two-item questionnaire to 76 participants and the age range of the respondents varied

considerably. Using a Chi-square and ANOVA, no statistically significant differences

were found between student of different ages and well-being.

Gender and Job Affective Well-being

In a 1988 study, Harris, Heller, and Braddock administered a 13 item scale

assessing anxiety, depression, and irritation (α = .92), cognitive appraisal measured 4

item scale (α = .73), a 2-item scale measured situation appraisal (α = .78), attachment

used an 8-item index (α = .82), and social support used a 5-point scale (α = .65) to 454

participants. The purpose of the study was to examine gender differences in

psychological well-being during the closing of a mental health care facility. There was a

total of 115 males and 333 females, the majority were white (91%), and the mean age of
36

the sample was 38. A t-test comparing males and females with regard to psychological

well-being was statistically Signiant t(438) = 2.04, p < .05. Gender differences in well-

being during a facility closure confirmed that females report more psychological health

problems than men.

Daley and Parfitt (1996) administered the Bipolar Profile of Mood States, Job

Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Harvard Step Test in addition to a set of physical

activity questions to 293 subjects. Of these employees 147 were male and 146 were

female. Ages ranged from 18 to 63 (M = 34.6, SD = 15.6). Participants held various

positions within the company ranging from clerical duties and secretarial work to

administrative and managerial/director posts. The MANCOVA revealed a significant

main effect for gender (F(1,257) = 2.51, p < .01). Analyses identified that males were

significantly physically fitter (p < .01) and reported significantly higher levels of physical

activity (p < .01) than females. The findings revealed that more physically active subjects

reported more job satisfaction as well as fewer perceived health problems and less

anxiety than physically inactive workers. Also, experienced fewer days of absenteeism

compared to non-active participants.

Collins et. al. (2010) administered an eighty-two-item questionnaire to 76

participants and the age range of the respondents varied considerably. Using an

independent t-test, there were no statistically significant differences for scores between

males and females and well-being.

Saboe (2012) administered Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)

for physical fitness, SF-36 Health survey, Food Frequency Questionnaire, Watson and

Clark’s PANAS 10-item subscale (α = .92), and Rosenberg’s 10-item Self-esteem scale
37

(α = .83) to 107 subordinates and supervisors. Of the subordinate respondents 69.2%

were female and 30.8% were male and of the supervisors 47.7% were female and 50.5%

were male. Regression analysis revealed no significant relationship between gender and

well-being.

Ethnicity and Job Affective Well-being

An exhaustive search of self-reported ethnicity and well-being articles concluded

that research is limited in this area. The search found three articles with no significance

between ethnicity and well-being

Dyrbye, Thomas, Eacker, Harper, Massie, Power, Huschika, Novotny, Sloan, and

Shanafelt (2007) administered Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Primary Care

Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME MD), and the Medical Outcome Study – Short

Form (SF-8) to 3,080 participants. The study explored differences in the prevalence of

burnout, depressive symptoms, and quality of life among minority and nonminority

medical students as well as the role race/ethnicity plays in student’s experiences.

Participants rated themselves (Self-Rated). Statistical Analysis used: Chi Square (x2), or

Kruskal – Wallis test, A forward stepwise logistic regression used to evaluate

independent associations among minority status, and multivariate analysis for age. There

were no statistically significant differences in screening positive for symptoms of

depression among minority groups (p = .49) or between minority students as a group and

nonminority students (p = .12). Also, no statistically significant differences in mental or

physical scores between different minority groups (p = .41 and p = .85 for mental and

physical scores respectively)


38

Collins et. al. (2010) administered an eighty-two-item questionnaire to 76

participants and the age range of the respondents varied considerably. Using a Chi Square

and ANOVA no statistically significant differences were found between ethnic

backgrounds and well-being.

Saboe (2012) administered Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)

for physical fitness, SF-36 Health survey, Food Frequency Questionnaire, Watson and

Clark’s PANAS 10-item subscale (α = .92), and Rosenberg’s 10-item Self-esteem scale

(α = .83) to 107 subordinates and supervisors. Regression analysis revealed no significant

relationship between ethnicity and well-being.

Tenure and Job Affective Well-being

In a 1978 study Warr administered survey questions on positive and negative

affect, anxiety levels, and feelings about present life to 1,655 participants. The age

distribution was under 25 years 7%, 25 to 34 years 17%, 35 to 44 years 19%, 45 to 54

years 25%, and 55years and above 31%. Correlation analysis of well-being found the

unemployed people report significantly lower well-being than those who have work.

Danna and Griffin (1999) conducted a review and synthesis of literature on health

and well-being in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to summarize and integrate

the extant literatures dealing with health and well-being in the workplace, with the goal

of moving this topic toward the mainstream of organizational research. An organizing

framework for the discussion and examines commonly used definitions and

conceptualizations of health and well-being, discuss factors associated with health and

well-being, and address how health and well-being can be improved through various

interventions. The review and synthesis implications are the clear need for creating a
39

rigorous model or theory of health and well-being in the workplace. The study found that

companies that have health interventions programs benefits both the employee and the

corporation.

Saboe (2012) administered Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)

for physical fitness, SF-36 Health survey, Food Frequency Questionnaire, Watson and

Clark’s PANAS 10-item subscale (α = .92), and Rosenberg’s 10-item Self-esteem scale

(α = .83) to 107 subordinates and supervisors. Subordinates’ reported being employed

with their current organization an average 4 years 7 months (M = 55.4 months, SD =

68.3) supervisors reported work with their current organization an average of 11 years 3

months (M = 111.5 months, SD = 93.8). Regression analysis revealed that supervisor’s

tenure in current position (β = -.18, p < .05) shares a significant relationship well-being.

Education and Job Affective Well-being

In a 1978 study Warr administered survey questions on positive and negative

affect, anxiety levels, and feelings about present life to 1,655 participants. Correlation

analysis of well-being found educational levels, participants with degree level

qualifications and higher-level national certificate, to be significantly associated with

positive well-being scores.

Saboe (2012) administered Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)

for physical fitness, SF-36 Health survey, Food Frequency Questionnaire, Watson and

Clark’s PANAS 10-item subscale (α = .92), and Rosenberg’s 10-item Self-esteem scale

(α = .83) to 107 subordinates and supervisors. Regression analysis revealed that

education level does not share a significant relationship with well-being.


40

Physical Activity and Job Affective Well-being

Daley and Parfitt (1996) administered the Bipolar Profile of Mood States, Job

Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Harvard Step Test in addition to a set of physical

activity questions to 293 subjects. Of these employees 147 were male and 146 were

female. Ages ranged from 18 to 63 (M = 34.6, SD = 15.6). Participants held various

positions within the company ranging from clerical duties and secretarial work to

administrative and managerial/director posts. A two-factor analysis of covariance

(ANCOVA) was calculated for the job satisfaction data. There was a main effect for the

physical fitness group (F(2,257) = 5.68, p < -01). Scheffe’s follow-up tests indicated that

members were on the whole more satisfied (M = 5.2, SD = 1.09) with their jobs (p < .01)

than the nonphysical active group (M = 4.5, SD = 1.3). The findings revealed that more

physically active subjects reported more job satisfaction as well as fewer perceived health

problems and less anxiety than physically inactive workers. Also, experienced fewer days

of absenteeism compared to non-active participants

In 2015, Wicker and Frick conducted a cross-sectional research study based on

survey data from the Eurobarometer and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM)

estimator used for large scale cross-sectional data. Survey data from 28 European

countries were used for the analysis with 22,971 participants. Two regression models

(Generalized Method of Moments) are estimated which analyze the effect of participation

intensity and duration on Subjective Well-being (SWB) (measured by life satisfaction).

The average level of SWB is 2.99 (SD = .77) equivalent to fairly satisfied. Respondents,

on average, reported that they practiced 2.17 days at moderate intensity (SD = 2.44) and

1.46 days at vigorous intensity (SD = 2.06) in the week. Regression analysis show that
41

the number of days people were physically active at moderate intensity significantly add

to SWB (r = .528, p < .001). Findings saw that the number of days people participate in

moderate-intensity activity is positively associated with Subjective Well-being – as well

as the duration of moderate-intensity activity.

Bell, Hamer, van Hees, Singh-Manoux, Kivimaki, and Sabia (2015) administered

the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire to assess self-reported

physical activity. Physical activity was also assessed using an accelerometer on their

wrist; and metabolic risk factor data was taken by a nurse to 3,457. The statistical

analysis of instruments of physical activity variables were standardized using z scores to

allow comparison between measure. Regression coefficients from general linear models

and accompanying 95% CIs were used to examine cross-sectional differences in

questionnaire and accelerometer-assessed total physical activity across six phenotypes.

Spearman’s correlation between self-reported and objectively assessed total physical

activity appeared to be nondifferential between healthy and normal-weight (.300, P <

.001) and healthy obese (.296, P < .001) adults. This correlation was weaker within

unhealthy obese adults (.205, P < .001). Pairwise comparisons showed differences in total

physical activity between healthy and unhealthy groups within all categories at both

stages of adjustment; healthy obese adults had higher total physical activity than their

unhealthy obese counterparts (P = .002). Research revealed that increased physical

activity was associated with reduced prevalence of all metabolic risk factors individually

including in overweight and obese adults.

Norris, Carroll, and Cochrane (1989) administered the Job Stress Questionnaire

(JSQ), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and Life Situation Survey (LSS) to 100
42

police officers with health problems. The study sought to examine different types of

training (i.e. aerobic vs anaerobic exercise regimes) to provide an active control for group

effects. Males between 20 – 50 years of age were assigned to either aerobic or anaerobic

training groups. Both groups (F(2,74) = 4.05, p < .05) and time (F(1,74) = 7.58, p < .01)

exerted a significant effect on responses to the JSQ. Post hoc comparisons reported

aerobic group reported less job stress than anaerobic group (p < .01). however, following

intervention aerobic and anaerobic registered lower job stress scores than the control

group (p < .01). LSS an ANOVA revealed (F(1,74) = 7.44, p < .01) as highly significant

and post hoc indicated that following intervention the aerobic and anaerobic group

registered lower scores than the control group (p < .01). Scores for GHQ scores similar,

ANOVA yielded significant effect (F(1,74) = 15.17, p < .001) post hoc revealed aerobic

and anaerobic group different scores with control group (p < .01). The study found that

the effects of training on self-reports surveys showed aerobic and anaerobic training

improves health and well-being.

A 2008, meta-analysis conducted by Parks and Steelman examined the effects of

participation in an organizational wellness program (fitness or comprehensive) on

absenteeism and job satisfaction. For the purposes of this study, organizational wellness

programs were classified into two types: fitness only and comprehensive. Fitness-

oriented programs provide on or off-site membership to health clubs in which participants

enjoy aerobic and nonaerobic activities, as well as weight training. Comprehensive

wellness programs include both a fitness component and an educational component such

as nutrition or stress reduction classes. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria for

the meta-analysis (15 published studies and 2 dissertations) yielding 7,705 individuals
43

with absenteeism data and 2,480 individuals with job satisfaction data. Meta-analytic

procedures followed a standardized mean difference effect size was calculated. In this

case, the effect size provided an estimate of the size of the treatment effect (participation

in a wellness program) as compared to the control group (non-participation in a wellness

program) and was calculated using the d statistic. For absenteeism the mean effect size

was (d = -.30, p < .00) with a confident interval of -.48 to -.22. For job satisfaction the

mean effect size was moderate (Cohen, 1969; d = .42, p < .03) with a confidence interval

of .05 to .80, indicating those participating in wellness programs tended to report higher

job satisfaction. Results indicate that participation in organizational wellness programs

ten to have lower absenteeism and higher job satisfaction.

Age and Physical Activity

Norris, Carroll, and Cochrane conducted two studies of adolescents (1992). In the

first study the measurements administered to 147 participants were Life Events

Questionnaire, Seriousness of Illness Rating Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the

Multiple Affect Adjective Check List at a comprehensive secondary school. The purpose

of the study was to determine whether participating in physical activity affects

psychological well-being in and adolescent population. The participants completed self-

reports of exercise and psychological stress and well-being. Correlational analysis found

a significant relationship with perceived stress (r = -.23, p < .01) and depression (r = -.18,

p < .05). Examination of the exercise variable reveals that it is consistently correlated

with the psychological well-being. In accordance with the evidence, it appears that

adolescents who report exercising more frequently also report significantly less perceived

stress and depression.


44

Norris et. al. second study (1992) administered Life Events Questionnaire,

Seriousness of Illness Rating Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Multiple Affect

Adjective Check List to 80 adolescents to further the study conducted to try to unravel the

mechanisms through which exercise may mediate between stress and illness. The same

self-report measures form study 1 were used in study 2, in addition fitness was assessed

using the Louisiana State University step-test. The data was analyzed using a one factor

ANCOVA and post hoc comparisons were conducted where appropriate using Newman-

Keuls method. The results of ANCOVA to the measures of exercise and perceived stress

(F(3,56) = 3.90, p < .01) shows an effect and post hoc analysis revealed that the high

intensity group displayed significantly lower scores at the end of the study than did the

other three groups (p < .05). ANCOVA applied to anxiety also demonstrated effect

(F(3,56) = 3.52, p < .05), and pair-wise comparisons revealed that the high intensity

group had reliably lower scores than the moderate intensity group (p < .05) at the end of

the intervention. After the ANCOVA results it was apparent that high intensity exercise

has a positive effect on psychological well-being reporting significantly less stress and

anxiety.

In a 2000 study, Lee and Paffenbarger conducted a health study from 13,485 men

who are Harvard Alumni that completed a 1977 survey. The respondents aged were <55,

55 – 64, 65 – 74, and >75 years at baseline 397, 704, 1,057, and 381, respectively, died

during follow-up. The multivariate analysis found that all age groups except the

youngest had a significant inverse trend between total energy expenditure and mortality.

The multivariate risks for men aged <55 years were 1.00, .79, .75, 1.01, and 1.02,

respectively (p, trend = .86). The results reveal a greater participation in moderate
45

activities showed a trend toward lower mortality rates, while greater energy expended in

vigorous activities clearly predicted lower mortality rates.

Caspersen Pereira, and Curran (2000) examined cross-sectional data from the

National Health Interview Survey, using the 1992 Youth Risk Behavior Survey

supplement for 10,645 adolescents and the 1991 Health Promotion/Disease Prevention

supplement for 43,732 adults. The purpose was to determine sex-specific, age-related

changes in physical activity patterns. The study did not use multiple tests of statistical

significance rather a calculate nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals to identify

potential statistically significant differences was used. Adolescents were computed the

difference in prevalence between ages 12 and 21 and divided the result by 9. Also

computed was the annual rate of change for the 3-year age grouping od 12-15, 15-18, and

18-21 year to compare data. Adults were computed the difference in prevalence between

the age groups of 18-29 and >75 year and divided that result by 57. The results show that

physical activity declined in adult age groups 18-29 years and 75 years and older.

Sustained activity and regular, vigorous activity patterns appeared to stabilize from ages

30 to 64 years, however the prevalence of strengthening and stretching continued to

decline through middle and older adulthood.

Gender and Physical Activity

Pauline (2013) administered the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire,

Exercise Motivation Inventory-2, and an Exercise Self-Efficacy Questionnaire to asses

physical activity, behavior, motivation, and self-efficacy respectively to 871 participants.

The purpose for this study was to assess baseline physical activity levels and psycho-

social determinants of physical activity in college students. The participants


46

demographics were 48.3% female and 51.7% male of undergraduate students (age M =

19.73 years, SD = 1.27) that volunteered to participate in the study. The independent

factors were gender (male and female) and class standing. The dependent variables were

GLTEQ scale scores, EMI-2 subscale scores, and Exercise Self-Efficacy scale scores. A

multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were employed to determine if there were

significant differences in physical activity, motivation, and self-efficacy in college

students. The level of significance was set at p < .05 for all analysis. Results indicate that

males and females differed on the type and amount of physical activity. The tests of

between-subjects effects showed males (M = 42.98, SD = 32.73) to significantly engage

in more strenuous exercise minutes per session, F(1,863) = 17.340, p < .001, than

females (M = 34.19, SD = 29.25) and males (M = 35.22, SD = 27.27) to significantly

engage in more moderate exercise minutes per session, F(1,863) = 11.549, p < .001, than

females (M = 29.37 , SD = 23.55). This study revealed male participants engaged in

significantly more vigorous and moderate minutes per session of physical activity than

females. Specifically, female college students displayed higher rates of physical inactivity

than male college students. This is an indication the rates of inactivity are related to

gender.

Caspersen Pereira, and Curran (2000) examined cross-sectional data from the

National Health Interview Survey, using the 1992 Youth Risk Behavior Survey

supplement for 10,645 adolescents and the 1991 Health Promotion/Disease Prevention

supplement for 43,732 adults. The purpose was to determine sex-specific, age-related

changes in physical activity patterns. The study did not use multiple tests of statistical

significance rather a calculate nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals to identify


47

potential statistically significant differences was used. The results found across the age

groups adult women had a 27% significantly higher prevalence of physical inactivity than

the men 21%, with moderate or large divergences at the youngest and oldest age groups

of 7 and 11 percentage points, respectively. After age 74, the prevalence of regular,

sustained activity began to decline substantially for both sexes, but the decline was more

pronounced for women.

Dagmar, Erik, Karel, and Ales (2011) administered International Physical

Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short and Long form and the Neighborhood Environment

Walkability Scale-Abbreviated (ANEWS) to 2,023 participants. The analysis included

957 males and 1,066 females ranging from 25 to 60 years of age (M = 40.18, SD = 9.56).

Statistical analysis carried out using the association between variables and physical

activity were quantified by use of the Spearman correlation coefficient. To assess

significant differences, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and its relevant effect size

ƞ2 coefficient were used. In the evaluation of total physical activity the study found a

significant increase over the years of monitoring in men [H(3, 957) = 54.08; p < .0001; ƞ2

= .057] and in women [H(3, 1066) = 54.17; p < .001; ƞ2 = .051]. Men showed in total,

significantly more physical activity than women as assessed in MET-min/week [H(1,

2023) = 13.37; p < .0003; ƞ2 = .007]. The study revealed significant differences were

found in vigorous physical activity between mean and women (p < .05) in favor of men.

Shiroma and Lee (2010) conducted a systematic evidence review behind the 2008

Guidelines summarized 30 prospective cohort studies published between 1995 and 2007,

all using self-reported data on physical activity, to examine the association with Coronary

Heart Disease (CHD). In total, these studies included >141,000 men and >263,000
48

women in gender-specific analysis and >50,000 subjects in analysis of both genders

combined. The review indicated that the inverse association between physical activity

and risk of developing coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease is present in

both men and women but more pronounced in women compared with men.

Abu-Omar and Rutten (2008) administered the self-reported instrument

International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form to 29,193 participants. The

objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between physical activities in

different domains (leisure time, occupational, domestic, commuting) and health

indicators. Data was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression modes. Physical

activity is calculated in energy expenditures (MET-minutes/week) using the IPAQ. The

result of leisure time physical activity (compared to no leisure time physical activity) was

positively associated with self-rated health (males: Odds Ration (OR) = 2.85, 95%

Confidence Interval (CI): 2.27, 3.58; females: OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.16, 3.56) and inversely

with obesity (males: OR = .65, 95% CI .50, .83; females: OR = .46, 95% CI .34, .63). The

result of the analysis shows a relationship of leisure time physical activity to health

indicators in both male and females, however men more active than females.

Ethnicity and Physical Activity

Shiroma and Lee (2010) conducted a systematic evidence review behind the 2008

Guidelines summarized 30 prospective cohort studies published between 1995 and 2007,

all using self-reported data on physical activity, to examine the association with Coronary

Heart Disease (CHD). In total, these studies included >141,000 men and >263,000

women in gender-specific analysis and >50,000 subjects in analysis of both genders

combined. The review found no statistically interactions among race were observed.
49

Tenure and Physical Activity

Schwetschenau, O’Brien, Cunningham, and Jex (2008) administered the

Corporate Exercise Barriers Scale (C-EBS) to 88 employees from a mid-western health-

care service corporation. The sample of respondents were 74% female with a mean age of

37 years (SD = 10.21), 58% were members of the on-site fitness center (N = 51), mean

organizational tenure was 5.7 years (SD = 5.7) with an average work week of 43.6 hours

(SD = 6.1), and 20% served in supervisory roles with mean number of people supervised

being 5 (SD = 7). Statistical analysis results indicated no statistical significance with

physical activity or inactivity and organizational tenure.

Peterson (2017) administered the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire, Concise

Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form,

and the Short Profile of Emotional Competences to 350 participants. The purpose of this

quantitative correlational study was to assess the relationship between the characteristics

of Authentic Leadership and three variables: physical activity, mindfulness, and

emotional competence. A one-way ANOVA found no significant difference with

organizational tenure and Authentic Leadership

Education and Physical Activity

A 2014 meta-analysis by Castelli, Centeio, Hwang, Barcelona, Glowacki, Calvert, and

Nicksic examined the history of physical activity and academic performance research.

Empirically experimental design research studies having both control and treatment

group were included in the meta-analysis (k = 20, N = 2,104). The study used Hedge’s

formula to calculate the effect size and assessed heterogeneity by using Q-statistic among
50

studies, significance at (p < .05) indicates a substantial level of heterogeneity. Data

results from all studies comparing physical activity group with control group showed that

children who participated in physical activity had significantly improved academic

performance including academic achievement and cognitive function with a random-

effect model [effect size = .383; Z = 4.934 (SE = .078); p < .05]. Meta-analysis revealed a

positive association between physical activity and academic performance.


CHAPTER THREE

Methodology

Overview

This research examined the relationship of physical activity, Authentic

Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being. The study is a non-experimental research

design that used a sample of convenience to administer instrument surveys to the sample

population. Descriptive statistics is used to address the problem of the statement and the

null hypothesis of the study. This chapter will show a detailed outline regarding the

methodology used to determine the outcome of the relationships examined. A description

of the participants, how data was collected, instruments, research design, statistical

analysis, null hypothesis, operational definitions, ethical definitions, and limitations are

all included in this section.

Sample Plan

Participants

The sample this research study examined was self-identified leaders in South

Texas area. A sample of convenience was used to administer the survey to potential

participants using SurveyMonkey. The potential participants were contacted from the

researcher’s personal network, social media outlets, and participants were requested to

send out link to their network. A total of 584 survey requests were sent out with an email

or posted on social media with a link to the survey. The participants voluntarily

completed the survey online after reading information regarding the survey, the
51
52

participants then agreed to an adult consent form by checking the appropriate box that

stated they agreed before they could continue with survey. The survey included

demographic questions, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Authentic

Leadership Questionnaire, and the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale. Participants

age group was from 18 years and older, gender and ethnicity were asked but not a factor

for completing the survey. There was a response rate of 41% or 241 responses from these

responses only 214 were useable.

Instruments

The first part of the survey that the participants completed was a demographics

survey that included questions regarding the participants age, gender, ethnicity, level of

education, and tenure.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire. To assess physical activity

participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire 7SF (IPAQ) to

self-report their minutes spent active. The short version of the IPAQ, that consists of a

seven item self-report instrument, is designed to measure health related to physical

activity. The IPAQ was developed by the International Consensus Group in 1998 – 1999

to establish a standardized and culturally adaptable measurement tool across various

populations in the world (Kim, Park, & Kang, 2012). The questions relate to time spent

being physically active in the last seven day prior to the survey. The questions covered

the amount of time in vigorous activity such as heavy lifting, digging, aerobics, or fast

bicycling; moderate activity such as carrying light loads, bicycling at a regular pace, or

tennis; walking this includes at work and home, traveling place to place; and time sitting.
53

Each activity is given a metabolic equivalent task (MET) level that is a score derived

from each type of activity.

Craig, Marshall, Sjostrom, Bauman, Booth, Ainsworth, Pratt, Ekelund, Yngve,

Sallis, and Oja (2003) tested the criterion validity against CSA accelerometers showing

overall acceptable strength for short form (N = 781, ρ = .33, 95% CI .23 – 36). The test-

retest reliability data for consistency of the IPAQ short form revealed acceptable

measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity (N = 1,974,

ρ = .76, 95% CI .73 – 77).

A study of reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in

college students (N = 123) mean age was 20.8, 75% were Caucasian, 74% were female,

and 94.3% were underclassmen. The overall students reported high physical activity,

engaging in 589.4±404.9 minutes of total physical activity during the previous week.

Males reported spending significantly more time than females in vigorous physical

activity (t = 3.2, df = 37.9, p = .003). The reported time spent in each category of physical

activity was compared between the two administrations of the IPAQ to examine

reliability of the instrument. The reported amount of time in moderate (t = 3.9, df =110, p

< .01) and total physical activity (t = 2.5, df = 110, p = .01) was different between

administrations. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .71 - .89, indicating

moderate to high reliability of the questionnaire items (Dinger, Behrens, and Han Ma,

2006).

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ Version 10. Self). Leadership was

assessed using the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) by the participants

(Avolio, Gardner, and Walumbwa, 2007). Participants completed a 16-item self-report


54

measure of components that make up Authentic Leadership theory. The four components

that make up Authentic Leadership are self-awareness, transparency, moral/ethical, and

balanced processing. The participants rate themselves on five-point Liker scale (0 = not at

all to 4 = frequently, if not always) that calculates the mean of each component for a

score. The four components that make up Authentic Leadership is averaged for a total

overall Authentic Leadership score (Avolio and Gardner, 2005).

Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, and Peterson (2008) performed a

confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using two independent samples from the United

States (N = 224) and the People’s Republic of China (N = 212). The CFA examined if

second order Authentic Leadership factor existed and if it explained the relationships

among the four lower order factors. The result was a CFA value of .95 and a root mean

square error of approximation value of .06 or less as indicative of adequate fit. The

estimated internal consistency alphas (Cronbach’s Alpha) for each measure were also

acceptable levels: self-awareness, .92; relational transparency, .87; internalized moral

perspective, .76; and balanced processing, .81.

A study of (N = 170) graduate nurses were selected to examine the relationships

between of Authentic Leadership, work engagement, and job satisfaction. The study used

Cronbach’s Alpha for reliability measures of the instrument and the results show: Overall

Authentic Leadership, .91; self-awareness, .88; transparency, .71; moral/ethical

perspective, .83; and balanced processing, .69.

Job-related Affective Well-being (JAWS). The Job-related Affective Well-being

Scale (JAWS) is a 20-item short version scale designed to assess people’s emotional

reactions to their job (Van Katwyk, Fox, Spector, and Kelloway, 2000). Each item is an
55

emotion respondent are asked on how often they have experienced each at work over the

prior 30 days. Responses are made with a five-point scale (Never, Rarely, Sometimes,

Quite often, Extremely often or always).

The internal consistency reliability measures using Cronbach’s Alpha for the 20-

item short form scale range from α = .80 to .90 (Van Katwyk et. al., 2000).

Operational Definitions

Physical activity assessed by the sum of the duration (minutes) and frequency

(days) using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form. Expressed as

metabolic equivalent task (MET) – minutes per week: MET level x minutes of

activity/day x days per week. MET levels ae walking = 3.3 METs, moderate intensity =

4.0 METs, and vigorous intensity = 8.0 METs. The selected MET values were derived

from work undertaken during the IPAQ Reliability Study in 2000 – 200, an average MET

score was derived for each type of activity (Craig et. al., 2003).

Authentic Leadership behaviors is evaluated by the mean of each subscale using

the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ Version 1.0 Self). Self-awareness refers to

the mean of the sum of the responses on four items. Transparency refers to the mean of

the sum of the responses on five items. Ethical/Moral perspective refers to the mean of

the sum of the responses on four items. Balanced processing refers to the mean of the

sum of the responses on three items by the leader. Overall Authentic Leadership refers to

the mean of the sum of the responses on all items of the Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire (Avolio et. al., 2007).

Job Affective Well-being is evaluated by completing the Job-related Affective

Well-being Scale (JAWS) by the self-identified leader. JAWS refer to the sum of the
56

responses on all items of the 20-item scale. The instrument measures pure affect as

opposed to the belief oriented and measures specific affected experienced in response to

the job. It has the ability to measure a wide range of affective states and to distinguish

patterns of related affective experience, such as negatively or positively balanced

responses at high or low levels of arousal (Van Katwyk et. al., 1999)

Research Design

This study utilized a non-experimental design with a sample of convenience to

administer survey responses to participants. Descriptive statistics were used to address

the null hypothesis by examine the responses from questionnaire. Pending results from

the categorical, dichotomous, or continuous variables determined the analysis that were

performed. Measures of central tendencies were used to organize the raw data from the

various questionnaires into a representative score. A bivariate correlation was performed

on data to obtain correlation coefficients describing the measure of the relationship

between two linear variables.

Multiple regression analysis performed to predict the value of the independent

and control variables on the dependent variable. Block method was used to enter data to

determine the variance of the model and the relative contribution of each predictor to

total variance explained. Enter method was used in blocks for categorical variables,

dummy variables needed to be created. For continuous or dichotomous variables stepwise

method was used. R2 and R2 measures the proportion of the variation and additional

variance accounted for by the most recent variable. Results that were significant and

continuous variables were analyzed further using beta weights () and partial correlations
57

(rp). Significant results with categorical variables were analyzed using a t-test for

dichotomous variables to find differences between the means of the variables. Analysis of

variance was used if significance was found on categorical variables to compare the

means of three or more groups. If differences found between the means a Fisher LSD

Post Hoc was used to find the significant differences between the groups. The analysis

was performed by using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp. 2017), and p value < .05 on all

statistical analysis indicated statistical significance.

Null Hypothesis (H0)

The following are the null hypothesis for this research study:

H01: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Self-Awareness) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H02: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Transparency) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H03: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Ethical/Moral Perspective) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H04: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Balanced Processing) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.


58

H05: There is no relationship between Overall Authentic Leadership Behavior and

Job-related Affective Well-being of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, education, and physical activity.

Procedure

Permission was granted to conduct this research by Our Lady of Lake University

Institutional Review Board (IRB). Permission was granted for the following instruments:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ Group), this instrument was free to

use. This research project was presented to Mind Garden Institute and was granted use of

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (Copyright© 2007 Bruce J. Avolio, William L.

Gardner, and Fred O. Walumbwa. All rights reserved) for the purpose of research. The

Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (Copyright© 2020 Professor Paul E. Spector,

PhD. All Rights Reserved) was granted with a written permission to Professor Spector in

return for results of this dissertation.

A single survey was developed and sent to potential and willing participants that

voluntarily agreed to participate in the research. The survey consists of an invitation to

the potential participant requesting their participation. This will consist of an

introduction, the reason for the study, the benefits of the study, and complete instructions

of what the potential participant will need to do if he or she accepts to continue with the

survey. At the end of the instructions in the introduction participants will agree on the

consent of the survey and continue to the first part of the survey. The first part of the

survey is a five-item demographic questionnaire asking for participant age, gender,

ethnicity, work tenure, and education level. The second part of the survey will be the first

instrument that is the IPAQ. Participants will be asked to complete a self-report of seven
59

items designed to measure health-related physical activity. Next, participants will

complete the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire a 16-item self-report Likert scale.

Participants will then proceed to the last part of the survey that is the Job-related

Affective Well-being Questionnaire. This questionnaire consists of 20 questions, Likert

scale, where participants will self-report both positive and negative emotions related to

their work.

The surveys were then examined using Microsoft Excel to score instruments and

organize the raw data. There were 241 surveys returned however not all were completed,

respondents completed certain instruments and skipping other instruments. As a result,

these surveys were excluded since this study is looking for the relationship between

physical activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being. A total of 214

surveys were used for this research study. Instructions for data cleaning and truncation

rules were followed as per IPAQ website. Next, data were inputted into a research tool

that scored the IPAQ short form on an excel spreadsheet that was developed by Hoi Lun

Cheng, Ph.D. (2016). The ALQ was scored using the instructions from Mind Garden to

average the item value to get the raw score for the scale. JAWS was scored as instructed

negative emotions were reversed scored and missing values were given a median score of

3 as recommended. After the scoring process the decision was made to use only the mean

scores of the positive emotions as Authentic Leadership is based on a pattern of behaviors

that draws upon and promotes both positive psychological capacities and a positive

ethical climate. These raw data were then entered into SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp.

2017) to analyze data and null hypothesis.


60

Ethical Considerations

This study was voluntary and anonymous at no costs or risks to the participants. The

study and instruments were reviewed and approved by OLLU IRB. A signed informed

consent form was received by participant with principal researcher’s and Dissertation

Committee Chair’s contact information. Identification numbers would be used to identify

each subject and in no way could be linked to any actual individual. Permission granted

to use IPAQ-7SF, ALQ Version 1.0, and JAWS (20-item Version).


CHAPTER FOUR

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between physical

activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being while controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education. This chapter provides the process of the data, the

descriptive statistics, and the analysis conducted and results.

Descriptive Statistics

Demographics of Participants

The surveys were disseminated electronically with 241 surveys returned of those

participants that returned surveys 214 (N = 214) were useable for this study. The

information provided were entered in SPSS Version 25 for analysis of the variables using

descriptive statistics that include mean score, sample size, and standard deviation. The

following figures of bar graphs and histograms provide a graphical description of the

sample.

Figure 1 provides a bar graph for the number of male and female respondents.

There was a total of 143 (67%) females and 71 (33%) males that completed the survey.

61
62

Figure 1. Distribution of the gender of respondents.

Figure 2. provides a bar graph of the age distribution of the respondents. The age

categories and number of respondents were 18 – 24 years 10 (4.7%), 25 – 34 years 30

(14%), 35 – 44 years 74 (34.6%), 45 – 54 years 66 (30.8%), 55 – 64 years 25 (11.7%),

and 65 years and older 9 (4.2%).

Figure 2. Distribution of the age of respondents.


63

Figure 3 provides a bar graph of the respondents’ tenure by years. Tenure categories

and the number of respondents 0 – 5 years 92 (43%), 6 – 14 years 63 (29%), and 15 and

more of years 59 (28%).

Figure 3. Distribution of tenure of the respondents.

Figure 4 is a bar graph of the respondents’ level of education. The categories and

number of respondents less than bachelor’s degree 36 (16.8%), bachelor’s degree 83

(38.8%), master’s degree 72 (33.6%), doctoral and professional degree 23 (10.7%).


64

Figure 4. Distribution of the level of education of respondents.

Figure 5 is a bar graph of the respondents’ ethnicity. The categories are as follows

Hispanic/Latino 184 (86%) and non-Hispanic/other 30 (14%).

Figure 5. Distribution of ethnicity of the respondents.

Physical Activity Ratings

International Physical Activity Questionnaire 7SF (IPAQ)


65

Physical activity was assessed using the IPAQ 7-item short form completed by

214 participants in the survey. The following section shows a histogram with the

distribution of scores for physical activity in figure 6. The total METs is shown and

ranges from .00 to 20000.00, the mean score is 3711.70 and standard deviation of

3571.90. A floor effect was observed this occurs when the mode is at the bottom of the

scale. The results of a floor effect may lead to an underestimate of the correlations

relative to the population and may lead to a type 2 error.

Figure 6. Distribution of physical activity scores.

Authentic Leadership Ratings

Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)

Leadership was assessed using the ALQ for Authentic Leadership and the

subscales of the Authentic Leadership components. The following section shows the

distribution of scores for each of the ALQ subscales and the overall total score for

Authentic Leadership.
66

Transparency scale scores distribution is shown in figure 7 of a histogram with a

mean score of 3.00 and standard deviation .540.

Figure 7. Distribution of scores on Transparency subscale.

Figure 8 is a histogram showing the distribution of scores on the Moral/Ethical

scale with mean of 3.24 and standard deviation of .604. This distribution indicates a

ceiling effect, which occurs when the mode is at the highest point on the scale. This

causes a skewed distribution that may lead to an underestimate of the correlations relative

to the population and may lead to a type 2 error.


67

Figure 8. Distribution of scores on Moral/Ethical subscale.

Figure 9 is a histogram showing the distribution of scores on the Balanced

Processing scale, a mean of 3.15, and standard deviation .604.

Figure 9. Distribution of scores on Balanced Processing subscale

Figure 10 is a histogram of the distribution of scores on Self-awareness scale, a

mean of 3.12 and standard deviation .543.


68

Figure 10. Distribution of scores on Self-awareness subscale.

Figure 11 is a histogram of the distribution scores for overall Authentic

Leadership, a mean score of 3.13 and standard deviation of .439.

Figure 11. Distribution of scores on Overall Authentic Leadership

Job Affective Well-being Ratings

Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS)


69

Job Affective Well-being was assessed with the JAWS that were completed by

the participants. The scores range from 1.00 to 5.00, a mean of 3.36, and a standard

deviation of .734. Figure 12 is a histogram of the distribution of scores for the JAWS.

Figure 12. Distribution of scores on Job Affective Well-being

Multiple Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis was used as the primary statistical method for this

study. Multiple regression analysis identifies the relationships between multiple

independent variables and dependent variables in two areas of research.

Research area one, the independent variable was physical activity and the

dependent variable was the four subscales of Authentic Leadership. The four subscales

that make up Authentic Leadership are Self-awareness, Transparency, Moral/Ethical

Perspective, and Balanced Processing. The demographic variables that were included

with physical activity were age, gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

Research area two, the independent variable was overall Authentic Leadership

and the dependent variable was Job Affective Well-being. The demographic variables are
70

age, gender, ethnicity, tenure, education, and physical activity was added in the second

research area for control.

A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients analysis was conducted to

identify bivariate relationships between the continuous variables. The analysis measures

the strength and direction of a linear association between two variables and is denoted by

r. The values from a Pearson correlation range in values from +1 to -1, a value of 0

indicates no association between two variables. A value greater than 0 indicates a positive

association and a value less than 0 indicates a negative association. Values of .01 to .29

indicate a weak association, values from .30 to .49 indicate a moderate association, and

values from .50 to 1.0 indicate a strong association. The bi-variate correlation coefficient

matrix of continuous variables can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1

Bi-Variate Correlation Table


Job-related Overall
Affective Moral/ Balanced Self Authentic IPAQ
Well-being Transparency Ethical Processing Awareness Leadership METs
Job-related
Affective Well-
being 1
Transparency 1
Moral/Ethical .433** 1
Balanced
Processing .211** .352** .491** 1
Self Awareness .215** .399** .431** .655** 1
Overall Authentic
Leadership .207** .697** .774** .814** .799** 1
IPAQ METs .213** .139* 1
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Weak Values .01 - .299 indicate weak association
Moderate Values .30 - .499 indicate a moderate association
Strong Values .50 - 1.0 indicate a strong association
71

Multiple regression blocks were designed, after the correlation analysis, to test the

null hypothesis. The multiple regression analysis allowed for the prediction of the

dependent variable from multiple independent variables.

In addition to multiple regression, a t-test was performed for dichotomous

variables and an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Fisher’s LSD Post Hoc for

categorical variables with three or more categories to identify relationships, differences,

and statistical significance of the variables. The continuous variables were International

Physical Activity Questionnaire, the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire scales, and the

overall Authentic Leadership. The categorical variables were age, tenure, and education.

Gender and ethnicity were dichotomous variables.

The Stepwise and Enter regression method were performed on the variables after

the variables had been set up in blocks. Multiple regression blocks allow for the variance

explained for a dependent variable by a set of predictor variables. Stepwise method was

performed for dichotomous variables or for continuous variables and enter method were

performed on categorical variables. Categorical variables must be dummy coded and

entered in a separate block because regression requires continuous variables. The dummy

coding creates a frequency counts of categories within one true variable. Stepwise

method enters the variables in different combinations until the best linear combination is

found and throws out non-significant and sets up significant predictors in the equation in

order of strongest to weakest.

Research area one used five blocks for each of the dependent variable Authentic

Leadership subscales (self-awareness, transparency, moral/ethical perspective, and

balanced processing).
72

In block 1, stepwise method was used in the regression analysis for the

demographic variables of gender and ethnicity.

Block 2 enter method was used in the regression analysis for the demographic

variable age. Dummy coding was required for the categories as there were six that

comprised the age variable.

Block 3 used an enter method in the regression analysis for the variable tenure.

Dummy coding was necessary as there were three categories that were included in the

variable tenure.

In block 4, the enter method was used in the regression analysis for the variable

education. This variable required dummy coding as there were four categories in

education variable.

Block 5 used stepwise method in the regression analysis for the total physical

activity variable.

▪ Block 1: Stepwise

➢ Gender (dichotomous)

➢ Ethnicity (dichotomous)

▪ Block 2: Age (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded

▪ Block 3: Tenure (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded

▪ Block 4: Education (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded

▪ Block 5: Physical Activity (Stepwise)


73

In research area two, Job-related Affective Well-being is now the dependent variable.

Block 1 used stepwise method in the regression analysis for gender, ethnicity, and

physical activity. The stepwise method may include both dichotomous and continuous

variables.

Block 2 used an enter method in the regression analysis for the demographic

variable age. Dummy coding was required for the categories as there were six that

comprised the age variable.

Block 3 used an enter method in the regression analysis for the variable tenure.

Dummy coding was necessary as there were three categories that were included in the

variable tenure.

Block 4, the enter method was used in the regression analysis for the variable

education. This variable required dummy coding as there were four categories in

education variable.

Block 5 a stepwise method was used in the regression analysis for overall

Authentic Leadership.

▪ Block 1: Stepwise

➢ Gender (dichotomous)

➢ Ethnicity (dichotomous)

➢ Physical Activity (continuous)

▪ Block 2: Age (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded

▪ Block 3: Tenure (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded
74

▪ Block 4: Education (Enter Method)

➢ Dummy coded

▪ Block 5: Overall Authentic Leadership (Stepwise)

Null Hypothesis

Null Hypothesis One: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic
Leadership Behavior Self-awareness

H01: There is no relationship between physical activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Self-awareness) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

The hypothesis was tested using multiple regression with five blocks. Block 1

included gender and ethnicity and was stepwise. Block 2, 3, and 4 contained age, tenure,

and education, respectively and were all enter method with dummy coding. Block 5

included physical activity and was stepwise. This regression analysis did not find any

statistical significance in this block. As a result, the study failed to reject the null

hypothesis one.

Null Hypothesis Two: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic
Leadership Behavior Transparency

H02: There is no relationship between physical activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Transparency) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure and education.


75

Multiple regression analysis was used to test the null hypothesis with five blocks.

Block one contained gender and ethnicity these were stepwise method. Block two, three,

four contained age, tenure, and education respectively, and were all enter method. Block

five contained physical activity. Table 2 represents the model summary for Authentic

Leadership behavior transparency.

Table 2: Model summary for Transparency

Model Summary for Physical Activity on Transparency


R
R Square Sig. F
Model R Square Change Beta β rp df1 df2 Change
1 .217a .047 1 212 .001
2 .269b .072 .025 .165 .162 1 211 .018
a Predictors: (Constant), Gender
b Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Physical Activity

Table 2 demonstrates the results of the multiple regression of the independent

variables and the dependent variable, Authentic Leadership Transparency. These results

indicate gender and physical activity were significant predictors of transparency. Gender

explained 4.7% of the total variance (R2 = .047, p < .05). A t-test revealed that males

scored significantly higher than females on transparency (t(212) = -3.24, p < .05). Null

hypothesis two is rejected as a result of the significant findings. Figure 13 represents the

more transparency males scored than females.


76

Figure 13. Bar Graph of Gender and Transparency.

Physical activity accounted for an additional 2.5% of the variance explained (ΔR2

= .025, β = .165, rp = .162, p < .05). Figure 14 represents the higher the physical activity

scores the higher they scored on Transparency.

Figure 14. Scatter plot of Physical Activity and Transparency.


77

Null Hypothesis Three: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic
Leadership Behavior Moral/Ethical Perspective

H03: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Moral/Ethical Perspective) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

Multiple regression analysis with five blocks tested the null hypothesis. In block

one stepwise was used for the dichotomous variables gender and ethnicity. For blocks

two to four were age, tenure, and education respectively using the enter method. Block

five was physical activity. Table three represent the model summary for the dependent

variable Authentic Leadership Moral/Ethical Perspective.

Table 3: Model Summary for Moral/Ethical Perspective

Model Summary for Physical Activity on Moral/Ethical


R
R Square Sig. F
Model R Square Change Beta β rp df1 df2 Change
1 .217a .047 3 210 .018
a Predictors: (Constant), Education

The results of the multiple regression indicate education was the only significant

predictor of Authentic Leadership Moral/Ethical Perspective. Education explained 4.7%

of the total variance (R2 = .047, p < .05). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) used to

compare the means of the groups found a significant difference between the means

(F(3,210) = 3.45, p < .05). A Fisher’s LSD Post Hoc revealed the differences and found

participants with a master’s degree and higher scored significantly higher than

participants with a bachelor’s degree and lower on Moral/Ethical Perspective. This result

failed to reject the null hypothesis however there was a significant predictor with the
78

demographic variable, education. Figure 15 represents the significant difference between

master’s and doctoral degree and bachelor’s degree and below.

Figure 15. Bar Graph on Education and Moral/Ethical Perspective

Null Hypothesis Four: The relationship between physical activity and Authentic
Leadership Behavior Balanced Processing

H04: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Balanced Processing) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

Multiple regression analysis using the five blocks tested the null hypothesis. In

block one stepwise was used for the dichotomous variables gender and ethnicity. For

blocks two to four were age, tenure, and education respectively using the enter method.

Block five was physical activity. This regression analysis did not find any statistical

significance with Balanced Processing. The study failed to reject the null hypothesis four.
79

Null Hypothesis Five: The relationship between Overall Authentic Leadership and
Job-related Affective Well-being

H05: There is no relationship between Overall Authentic Leadership Behavior and

Job-related Affective Well-being of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, education, and physical activity.

Multiple regression analysis with five blocks tested the null hypothesis. In block

one stepwise was used for the dichotomous variables gender and ethnicity and continuous

variable physical activity. For blocks two to four were age, tenure, and education

respectively using the enter method. Block five contained the overall Authentic

Leadership continuous variable. Table four represent the model summary for the

dependent variable Job-related Affective Well-being.

Table 4: Model Summary for Job-related Affective Well-being

Model Summary for Overall Authentic Leadership on Job-related Affective Well-being


R
R Square Sig. F
Model R Square Change Beta β rp df1 df2 Change
1 .207a .043 .207 1 212 .002
a Predictors: (Constant), Overall Authentic Leadership

The multiple regression results indicate that overall Authentic Leadership was a

significant predictor of Job-related Affective Well-being. Overall Authentic Leadership

accounted for 4.3% of the total variance explained (R2 = .043, β = .207, p < .05).

Therefore, this null hypothesis is rejected with the significant finding. Figure 16

represents the higher participants rated scored on overall Authentic Leadership the higher

they scored on Job-related Affective Well-being.


80

Figure 16. Scatter plot of Overall Authentic Leadership and Job-related Affective Well-

being

Summary of Results

Authentic Leadership Self-awareness: No significance found with self-awareness

with the independent and control variables.

Authentic Leadership Transparency: Males scored higher than females on

transparency. The higher participants rated on physical activity the higher their score on

transparency.

Authentic Leadership Moral/Ethical Perspective: Participants with a master’s

degree and higher scored higher than participants with a bachelor’s degree and below.

Authentic Leadership Balanced Processing: No significance was found with

balanced processing and the independent and control variables.

Job-related Affective Well-being: The higher participants rated on Overall

Authentic Leadership the higher they rated on Job-related Affective Well-being.


CHAPTER FIVE

Discussion

This chapter discusses the results of the study, the limitations of the study, the

implications, and the recommendations for future research. The study examined the

relationship between physical activity and the Authentic Leadership behaviors of self-

awareness, transparency, moral/ethical perspective, and balanced processing. The study

also examined the relationship between overall Authentic Leadership and Job-related

Affective Well-being. The control variables were age, gender, ethnicity, tenure, and

education.

Rejection of the Null Hypothesis

This study examined the relationship between leaders’ self-rated physical activity

and Authentic Leadership Behaviors and the relationships between leaders’ self-rated

overall Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being. There were limited studies

found on the relationship between physical activity, Authentic Leadership, and Job

Affective Well-being. This study will contribute to the research of physical activity,

leadership and well-being.

Five null hypotheses were identified for this study two of which were rejected as

significant relationships were found in the research areas of Authentic Leadership

Transparency and Job-related Affective Well-being. The study failed to reject hypothesis

one, three, and four but did find significance in the dependent variable and an

independent control variable. The five null hypothesis in this study are as follows:

81
82

H01: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Self-Awareness) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H02: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Transparency) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age, gender,

ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H03: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Ethical/Moral Perspective) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H04: There is no relationship between Physical Activity and Authentic Leadership

Behavior (Balanced Processing) of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, and education.

H05: There is no relationship between Overall Authentic Leadership Behavior and

Job-related Affective Well-being of self-identified leaders when controlling for age,

gender, ethnicity, tenure, education, and physical activity.

Important Findings

The research study found statistical relationships between independent variables

and dependent variables, after correlation analysis (Table 1) and multiple regression

analysis were performed (Table 5).

Table 5: Significant predictors associated with dependent variables.


83

p < .05 Dependent Variables


Job-
related
Affective
Independent Self- Balanced Well-
Variables Awareness Transparency Moral/Ethical Processing being
Physical ΔR2 = .025
Activity β = .165
Overall
Authentic R2 = .043
Leadership β = .207

R2 = .047
t(212) = -3.24
Males >
Gender Females

Ethnicity

Age

Tenure
R2 = .047
F(3, 210),-3.45
Master's >
Education Bachelor's
Physical
Activity

Physical activity was a predictor of transparency from the four scales of Authentic

Leadership behaviors. Gender was a predictor of transparency, males scored higher than

females.

Education was a predictor of moral/ethical perspective. Participants with a

master’s degree and higher scored higher on moral/ethical than participants with a

bachelor’s degree and less.


84

Overall Authentic Leadership was a predictor of Job-related Affective Well-

being. The higher participants rated on overall Authentic Leadership the higher they rated

on Job-related Affective Well-being.

The demographic control variables of ethnicity, age, and tenure were not

significant predictors of any of the Authentic Leadership behaviors or Job-related

Affective Well-being dependent variables.

Limitation of Study

The study identified several limitations. The first being that this study was a non-

experimental study that used a sample of convenience. The research instruments were

self-reported by the participants that may overstate levels of activity on survey

instruments. Study was done in the summer month where people are most active, and the

International Physical Activity Questionnaire has a seven-day recall. Another limitation

is the floor effect that was observed with physical activity that may lead correlations to be

underestimated relative to the population. The study also observed a ceiling effect with

moral/ethical perspective that may also lead correlations to be underestimated relative to

the population.

Recommendation for Future Research

The study explored the relationship between physical activity and Authentic

Leadership behaviors and overall Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being.

The purpose for this study was to add to a body of knowledge that to my understanding is

limited. This study contributes to the field of physical activity and leadership while also

providing support for well-being in the workplace. Future research is needed between
85

physical fitness and leadership. Often, we find literature on the importance of physical

activity will physical well-being such as blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, and other

chronic diseases. Though these studies are very important and must continue and new

arena of research should focus on physical activity and the mental/psychological well-

being.

Future research using various leadership theories may also be considered to

expand the limited body of knowledge that currently exists. Leadership theories such as

Full Range Model (Bass & Avolio, 1995) with its different leadership characteristics may

show a better understanding when looking at a relationship with physical activity. Much

more is needed in this field of research there is much to gain and learn from.

Discussion

This study set out to find a relationship between physical activity, Authentic

Leadership, and Job Affective Well-being. Although the study did not find many results

with the statistical analysis used, we did manage to identify some significant relationships

that are at the core of what this study set out to accomplish. The review of the literature

revealed significance with physical activity and leadership, although one study found a

negative relationship. This study also found a positive significance with physical activity

and Authentic Leadership behavior transparency. This process also revealed the limited

research available for this area of study. Another important area of research that is limited

is the relationship of leadership and affective well-being. Previous research has found

significance in these area constructs as well as this study finding a statistical significance

between Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being.


86

Based on the findings of this study and the review of literature some implications

were made. Regarding physical activity and leadership, research shows that physical

activity may build resiliency to cope with stress from the work environment. Physical

activity may lead to more transparency in the leader and the workplace which may lead to

a more positive office environment. Gender showed significance with males being more

transparent than females thus more studies needed to find if there is more to this finding

as more females are entering more leadership roles.

The statistical significance found between Authentic Leadership and Job

Affective Well-being and the previous studies found for the literature review support the

positive relationship between the two constructs. The implications are that practicing

Authentic Leadership behaviors may result in a positive job satisfaction that according to

the research found may lead to follower satisfaction with the leader and job satisfaction is

a fundamental objective of well-being. Another implication is that significance found

with education and moral/ethical perspective of Authentic Leadership theory. There was

no significant relationship found in the literature review between education and

leadership however this study did find significance between education the moral/ethical.

The implications are that individuals in leadership roles tend to be higher educated with

graduate degrees which is when classes on ethics are offered by universities, which is

beneficial to the leader and the organization.

Some of the key takeaways from this study is the findings with physical activity

and transparency and the idea that is finding is added to a limited body of knowledge. As

mentioned previously, this study set out to find a significance between the two and add to

a limited body of knowledge to the area. In the process this study also found significance
87

with overall Authentic Leadership and Job Affective Well-being and according the

research Authentic Leadership decreases stress and enhances employee well-being in the

workplace. Physical activity is a phenomenon that needs more research on the construct

of leadership and well-being. This study explored those relationships and the conclusions

were drawn based on the findings of the data. Research in leadership is expanding with

various leadership theories and the instruments to the theories. The idea of the emerging

constructs of physical activity, leadership, and well-being will help provide information

for individuals to better handle stress and for employers to better assist their workforce to

lead a healthy lifestyle.


REFRENCES

Abu-Omar, K., & Rutten, A., (2008). Relation of leisure time, occupational, domestic,

and commuting physical activity to health indicators in Europe. Elsevier Journal

of Preventive Medicine, 47, 319-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.012

Armstrong, T., Candeias, V., Quintiliana, L., Roy, C., Ai, X., Leurent, H. & Nayyar, S.,

(2008). Preventing Noncommunicable disease in the workplace through diet and

physical activity. World Health Organization/World Economic Forum. Retrieved

from http://who.int/dietphysicalactivity/en/.

Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., & Walumbwa, F. O., 2007). Authentic Leadership

Questionnaire (ALQ Version 1.0 Self). Mind Garden Inc. Retrieved with

permission from http://www.mindgarden.com.

Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F. & May, D. R., (2004).

Unlocking the Mask: A Look at the process by which authentic leaders impact

follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. doi:

10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003

Azanza, G., Moriano, J. A., & Molero, F., (2013). Authentic Leadership and

organizational culture as drivers of employees’ job satisfaction. Journal of Work

and Organizational Psychology, 29, 45-50. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a7

Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E., (2016). A meta-analytic

review of Authentic and Transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The

Leadership Quarterly, 27, 634-652.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006
88
89

Bell, J. A., Hamer, M., van Hees, V. T., Stingh-Manoux, A., Kivimaki, M., & Sabia, S.,

(2015). Healthy obesity and objective physical activity. The American Journal of

Clinical Nutrition, 102, 268-275. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110924

Beyer, P. D., (2010). Authentic Leadership in extremis: A study of combat leadership

(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global

database. (UMI Number 3398746)

Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W., (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective

well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and

synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290-314. doi:

10.1177/1088868310391271

Caspersen, C. J., Pereira, M. A., & Curran, K. M., (2000). Changes in physical activity

patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Medicine & Science

in Sports & Exercise 1601-1609. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00013

Castelli, D. M., Centeio, E. E., Hwang, J., Barcelona, J. M., Glowacki, E. M., Calvert, H.

G., & Nicksic, H. M., (2014). The history of physical activity and academic

performance research: Informing the future. Society for Research in Child

Development, 79(4), 119–148.

Cerne, M., Jaklic, M. & Skerlavaj, M., (2013). Authentic Leadership, creativity, and

innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9(1), 63-85. doi:

10.1177/1742715012455130

Cheng, HL. A simple, easy-to-use spreadsheet for automatic scoring of the International

Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form (updated November 2016).

ResearchGate, 2016.
90

Clapp-Smith, R., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Avey, J. B., (2009). Authentic Leadership and

Positive Psychological Capital. Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies,

15(3), 227-240. doi: 10.1177/1548051808326596

Collins, S., Coffey, M., & Morris, L., (2010). Social Work Students: Stress, Support and

Well-Being. British Journal of Social Work 40, 963-982. doi:

10.1093/bjsw/bcn148

Craig, C. L., Marshal, A. L., Sjostrom, M. Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E,

Pratt, M., Ekelund, E., Yngve, A., Sallis, J. F., & Oja, P. (2003). International

Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12 Country Reliability and Validity. Medicine &

Science in Sports & Exercise, 1381 – 1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.

61453.FB

Dagmar, S., Erik, S., Karel, F., & Ales, S., (2011). Gender Differences in Physical

Activity, Sedentary Behavior and BMI in the Liberec Region: the IPAQ Study in

2002-2009. Journal of Human Kinetics, 28, 123-131. doi: 10.2478/v10078-011-

0029-6

Daley, A. J., & Parfitt, G., (1996). Good health – Is it worth it? Mood states, physical

well-being, job satisfaction and absenteeism in members and non-members of a

British corporate health and fitness club. Journal of Occupational and

Organizational Psychology. 69, 121-135.

Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W., (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review

and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357-384.

Diener, E., (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin Journal 95(3), 542-

575.
91

Dinger, M. K., Behrens, T. K., & Han, J. L., (2006). Validity and Reliability of the

International Physical Activity Questionnaire in College Students. American

Journal of Health Education, 37(6), 337-343. Doi:

10.1080/19325037.2006.10598924

Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Massie, S. Power, D. V.,

Huschka, M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Shanafelt, T. D., (2007). Race,

Ethnicity, and Medical Student Well-being in the United States. Archives of

Internal Medicine, 167(19), 2301-2109.

Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engan, M. L., (2003). Transformational,

transactional, and laissez-fairre leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing

women and men. American Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591. doi:

10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., Dickens, M. P., (2001). Authentic

Leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership

Quarterly, 22, 1120-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007

Gatling, A., (2014). The Authentic Leadership qualities of business coaches and it impact

on coaching performance. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and

Mentoring, 12(1), 27-46.

Gatling, A., Castelli, P. A., & Cole, M. L., (2013). Authentic Leadership: The role

of self-awareness in promoting coaching effectiveness. Asia-Pacific Journal of

Management Research and Innovation, 9(4), 337-347. doi:

10.1177/2319510X14523097
92

Giallonardo, L. M., Wong, C. A., Iwasiw, C. L., (2010). Authentic Leadership of

preceptors: predictors of new graduate nurses’ work engagement and job

satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 993-1003.

Grant, L., & Kinman, G., (2011). Enhanceing well-being in social work students:

Building resilience in the next generation. Social Work Education The

International Journal, 31(5), 605-621.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.590931

Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, M. K., (2006) Too Much of a Good Thing: The Curvilinear

Effect of Leader-Member Exchange on Stress. The Journal of Social

Psychology, 14(6), 65-84, DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.146.1.65-84

Harris, M. M., Heller, T., & Braddock, D., (1988). Sex differences in psychological well-

being during a facility closure. Journal of Management, 14(3), 391-402.

Hock, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D., (2016). Do Ethical, Authentic,

and Servant Leadership explain variance above and beyond Transformational

Leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 1-29. doi:

10.1177/0149206316665461

Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrang, J. D., (2005). Authentic Leadership and

eudemonic well-being: understanding leader – follower outcomes. The

Leadership Quarterly 16, 373-394. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002

Jasso, S. L., (2016). Authentic Leadership and Emotional Intelligence: Predicting Student

Success (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://library.ollusa.edu/library.


93

Kim, Y., Park, I., & Kang, M., (2012). Convergent Validity of the International Physical

Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): meta-analysis. Public Health Nutrition, 16(3),

440-452. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002996

Kiser, K., & Clayton, J., (2018). Aerobic physical activity and the leadership of

principals. Journal of School Leadership, 28 202-228.

Lee, I., & Paffenbarger, S. Jr., (2000). Associations of Light, Moderate, and Vigorous

Intensity Physical Activity with Longevity. American Journal of Epidemiology,

151(3), 293-299.

Lee, P. H., Macfarlane, D. J., Lam, T., & Stewart, S. M., (2011). Validity of the

International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): A

systematic Review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical

Activity 8:115. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115

Locke, E. A., (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human

Performance, 4, 309-336.

Loehr, J., & Schwartz, T., (2009). The Making of a Corporate Athlete. Harvard Business

Review 79(1), 120-128.

Lopez, M. J., (2015). Exploring the relationship between a classroom teacher’s Authentic

Leadership, Charismatic/Value-Based Leadership (Doctoral dissertation).

Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global database (ProQuest

Number 3664082).

Lovelace, K. J., (2002). Survival of the fittest: an investigation of the relationship

between stressful work environments, physical fitness, and employee well-being


94

(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global

database. (UMI Number 3039373)

Lovelace, K. J., Manz, C. C., & Alves, J. C., (2007). Work stress and leadership

development: The role of self-leadership, shared leadership, physical fitness and

flow in managing demands and increasing job control. Human Resource

Management Review, 17, 374-387. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.001

Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., Eid, M., & Cacioppo, J. T., (2012). Time frames and the

distinction between affective and cognitive well-being. National Institute of

Health, 46(4), 431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.004

Lyons, J. B., & Schneider, T. R., (2009). The effects of leadership style on stress

outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 737-748. doi:

10.1016/j.leaqua.20019.06.010

McDowell-Larsen, S. L., Kearney, L., & Campbell, D., (2002). Fitness and leadership: is

there a relationship? Regular exercise correlates with higher leadership ratings in

senior-level executives. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(4), 316-324. doi:

10.1108/02683940210428119

Neck, C. P., Mitchell, T. L., Manz, C. C., Cooper, K. H., & Thompson, E. C., (2000).

Observations fit to lead: is fitness the key to effective executive leadership?

Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(8), 833-841.

https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010694323

Nelson, K., Boudrias, J., Brunet, L., Morin, D., De Civita, M., Savoie, A., & Alderson,

M., (2014). Authentic Leadership and psychological well-being at work of nurses:


95

The mediating role of work climate at the individual level of analysis. Journal of

Burnout Research, 1, 90-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.08.001

Nevins, S., & Hoffman, J., (Executive Producers). (2012). The Weight of a Nation

[Documentary Series]. Home Box Office, Inc.

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C., (2013). A meta-analysis of the relationship of age and

tenure with innovation-related behavior. Journal of Occupational and

Organizational Psychology, 86, 585-616.

Nielson, M. B., (2013). Bullying in work groups: The impact of leadership. Scandinavian

Journal of Psychology, 54, 127-136. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12011

Norris, R., Carroll, D., & Cochrane, R., (1990). The effect of aerobic and anaerobic

training on fitness, blood pressure, and psychological stress and well-being.

Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 34(4), 367-375.

Norris, R., Carroll, D., & Cochrane, R., (1992). The effect of physical activity and

exercise training on psychological stress and well-being in an adolescent

population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36(1), 55-65

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014, June).

Obesity update. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/

Parks, K. M. & Steelman, L. A., (2008). Organizational Wellness Programs: A Meta-

Analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 58-68. doi:

10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.58

Pauline, J. S., (2013). Physical activity behaviors, motivation, and self-efficacy among

college students. College Student Journal, 47(1) 64-74.


96

Peterson, M. L., (2017). Authentic Leadership links between physical activity,

mindfulness, and emotional competence (Doctoral dissertation). Available from

ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global database. (ProQuest Number 10270883)

Prestol-Puesan, J., (2015). An exploratory, correlational, self-rater study on Authentic

Leadership values of Adventist local conference chief financial officers in the

United States (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation &

Theses Global database. (UMI Number 3700503)

Rahimnia, F. & Sharifirad, M. S., (2015). Authentic Leadership and Employee Well-

Being: The Mediating Role of Attachment Insecurity. Journal Business Ethics,

132, 363-377. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2318-1

Rodriguez, J., (2016). Emotional intelligence and Authentic Leadership: An empirical

exploration of two emerging theoretical constructs (Doctoral dissertation).

Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global database. (ProQuest

10304266)

Ruiz, E. L., (2018). Emotional Intelligence and Physical Activity Predicting Authentic

Leadership (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation &

Theses Global database. (ProQuest 10822995)

Saboe., K. N., (2012). Fit to lead? Supervisors’ health behaviors, well-being, and

leadership behaviors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest

Dissertation & Theses Global database. (UMI Number 3522785).

Schwetschenau, H. M., O’Brien, W. H., Cunningham, C. J. L., & Jex, S. M., (2008).

Barriers to Physical Activity in an on-site Corporate Fitness Center. Journal of


97

Occupational Health Psychology 13(4), 371-380. doi: 10.1037/1076-

8998.13.4.371

Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Hartel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I., (2016). Are Authentic

Leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between

Authentic Leaders and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 125-139. doi:

10.1007/s10551-014-2351-0

Sessa, V. I., Kabacoff, R. I., Deal, J., & Brown, H., (2007). Generational differences in

leader values and leadership behaviors. The Psychologist Manager Journal, 10(1),

47-74.

Shain, M., & Kramer, D. M., (2004). Health promotion in the workplace: framing the

concept; reviewing the evidence. Occupational and Environmental Medicine,

61(7), 643-648.

Shamir, B., & Eilam, G., (2005). “What’s your story?” A life-stories approach to

Authentic Leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395-417. doi:

10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005

Shiroma, E. J. & Lee, I., (2010). Physical Activity and cardiovascular health lessons

learned from epidemiological studies across age, gender, and race/ethnicity.

Journal Circulation, 122, 743-752. doi:

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914721

Steptoe, A., Edwards, S., Moses, J., & Mathews, A., (1989). The effects of exercise

training on mood and perceived coping ability in anxious adults from the general

population. Journal of Psychosomatic research, 33(5), 537-547.


98

Stone, D. A., (2016). A study of the relationships between self-esteem, locus of control,

Authentic Leadership, and veterinarians in the United States (Doctoral

dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global database.

(ProQuest 10014682)

Tate, B., (2008). A longitudinal study of the relationships among self-monitoring,

Authentic Leadership, and perceptions of leadership. Journal of Leadership &

Organizational Studies, 15(1), 16-29

Teaf, S. H., (2014). Authentic Leadership: An examination of the relationship between

political ideology, moral reasoning, and Authentic Leadership behaviors

(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global

database. (UMI Number 3581564)

Toor, S., & Ofori, G., (2009). Authenticity and its influence on psychological well-being

and contingent self-esteem of leaders in Singapore construction sector.

Construction Management and Economics, 27, 299-313. doi:

10.1080/01446190902729721

U.S. Census Bureau, (2016, June 24). Retrieved from

https://www.census.gov/glossary/#term_Age

U.S. Census Bureau, (2016, June 24). Retrieved from

https://www.census.gov/glossary/#term_Gender

U.S. Census Bureau, (2016, June 24). Retrieved from

https://www.census.gov/glossary/#term_Educationalattainment

U.S. Census Bureau, (2016, June 24). Retrieved from

https://www.census.gov/glossary/#term_Ethnicorigin
99

Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, K. E., (2000). Using the Job-

Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to Investigate Affective Responses

to Work Stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219-230.

doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.219

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., Peterson, S. J., (2008).

Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure.

Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. doi: 10.1177/0149206307308913

Wang, Y., & Beydoun, M. A., (2007). The obesity epidemic in the United States –

gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: A

systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiologic Review, 29, 6-28.

doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm007

Warr, P., (1978). A study of psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 69,

111-121.

Wicker, P., & Frick, B., (2015). The relationship between intensity and duration of

physical activity and subjective well-being. European Journal of Public Health,

25(5), 868-872. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv131

World Health Organization (WHO). (2014, January). Physical activity. Retrieved from

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/#
APPENDICES

Appendix A: OLLU Institutional Review Board Notice of Approval

Appendix B: Participant Consent Form

Appendix C: Permission to use International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

Appendix D: Permission to use Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)

Appendix E: Permission to use Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS)

Appendix F: Demographic Survey

100
101

Appendix A

OLLU Institutional Review Board Approval


102

Appendix B

Participant Consent Form


103

Appendix B Continued

Participant Consent Form


104

Appendix C

Permission to use International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)


105

Appendix D

Permission to use Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)


106

Appendix E

Permission to use Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS)

Dear Leo:

You have my permission for noncommercial research/teaching use of any of my


scales that are in the Our Assessments section of my website paulspector.com,
including the JAWS. You can find copies of the scales in the original English and
for some scales other languages, as well as details about the scale's
development and norms on the website. I allow free use for noncommercial
research and teaching purposes in return for sharing of results. This includes
student theses and dissertations, as well as other student research projects.
Copies of the scale can be reproduced in a thesis or dissertation as long as the
copyright notice is included, "Copyright Paul E. Spector, All rights reserved" with
the appropriate year. Results can be shared by providing an e-copy of a
published or unpublished research report (e.g., a dissertation). You also have
permission to translate the scales into another language under the same
conditions in addition to sharing a copy of the translation with me. Be sure to
include the copyright statement, as well as credit the person who did the
translation with the year.

Thank you for your interest in my scales, and good luck with your research.

Best,

Paul Spector, Distinguished Professor


Department of Psychology
PCD 4118
University of South Florida
Tampa, FL 33620
813-974-0357
pspector@usf.edu
Website: http://shell.cas.usf.edu/~pspector/
107

Appendix F

Demographics Survey

You might also like