Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kûfâ Is Better
Kûfâ Is Better
Introduction
The history of the town of Kufa is a crucial topic in the general study
of the expansion of the Muslim Empire towards the east in the 7th century
as well as in research concerning the creation of the medieval Muslim
town. Nevertheless, for several decades Kufa was only a marginal town
in Iraq, a neglected suburb of Najaf. Since the town was ruined in the
late ‘Abbasid period, much of its history still remains a mystery. The aim
of this article is to try to reconstruct Kufa’s original religious status in
early Islam. Another goal is to prove the existence of the fa∂a’il al-Kufa
literature, a genre which is typical of venerated towns in Islam. The article
presents strong indications that this town was considered, in Iraq in general
and in Shi‘i society in particular, to be the most sacred place in the Muslim
world. The article also deals with Shi‘i apocalyptic beliefs related to Kufa
that would eventually motivate the extreme activity of the Shi‘i Qarma†ians
of BaÌrayn and shock the Muslim world.
While the city of Kufa has received much attention in historical studies1,
its religious status remained a marginal issue, usually mentioned in the
context of holy places in Islam. This is explained by the fact that Kufa
was the political center of Islam only for brief periods and was founded
by the Muslim army in a location which apparently had no religious back-
ground. Hence, Medina, Damascus and later Baghdad were considered to
be the main political capitals of the Muslim caliphate and Mecca, Medina
and Jerusalem were considered to be the holy cities of the empire. How-
ever, this common assumption is wrong, since medieval sources point
clearly to the fact that Kufa did have a religious background; its location
was an important Christian site and also a center of Arab pagan cult
before Islam. Moreover, it had religious importance in the first two
decades of Islam, much beyond what is known today, as is demonstrated
below.
M.J. Kister recently dedicated an important part of his study of holy
places in Islamic tradition to Kufa2, as did O. Livne-Kafri in his article
1
See DJAIT, al-Kufa. See his detailed bibliography, p. 333-338.
2
KISTER, Sanctity Joint and Divided.
Kufa was founded in 17/638 in the area of the Caliph ‘Umar’s great
conquests. It was mainly a garrison camp (miÒr, pl. amÒar) designated
3
LIVNE-KAFRI, The Early Shi‘a.
4
HAIDER, Prayer, Mosque, and Pilgrimage.
for the Muslim warriors headed to the east, until its Umayyad governor,
Ziyad ibn Abihi (50/670-53/672), transformed it into a real city and built
its Great Mosque. According to Hichem Djait, the urbanization of Kufa
reached its peak in the 3rd/8th century, when its population was estimated
at around 300-400 thousand people. In his important study of the city,
Djait suggests that Kufa was founded as an Arab alternative to the old
Iraqi center of Îira and also as an alternative center to the Persian capital
of Ctesiphon. Its location was ideal for the Arab fighters as a station for
the future conquest of Persia and its position was based on the strategy
of creating the amÒar at the desert borders5.
Kufa turned from a garrison camp into an important urban center, to
such an extent that both the Shi‘ites and the ‘Abbasids chose it as their
capital. But for political reasons, these two chapters in Islamic history,
with Kufa the capital of the empire, were very short: ‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib,
the fourth caliph and the greatest Imam of the Shi‘ites, transferred the
capital of the caliphate for the first time out of Arabia. He chose Kufa,
where his supporters were, as his new capital, thus making the town an
alternative political center to Medina. Because of his rivalry with Syria’s
governor, Mu‘awiya ibn Abi Sufyan, and his questioned legitimacy among
the Iraqis themselves, ‘Ali’s caliphate was short and he was murdered in
41/661, only five years after moving to Kufa. After his death the Umayyad
dynasty ruled from Syria, transferring the capital to Damascus. Only in
129/749 did Kufa regain its capital status, as a result of the ‘Abbasid revo-
lution and the overthrow of the Umayyad dynasty. Shi‘i rebels did not
command the ‘Abbasid revolution, but were merely exploited as troops by
the ‘Abbasids in order to remove their mutual Umayyad enemy. When
they felt powerful enough to get rid of their Shi‘i allies, the ‘Abbasids built
their own new town, Baghdad, which took the place of Kufa in 145/762
as the new capital of the ‘Abbasid empire. Since that time, Kufa has never
regained its status.
Since the two brief periods when the town was the capital of the Muslim
world, the Sunni authorities seem to have made considerable effort to
reduce the importance of Kufa, probably due to the fact that it represented
Shi‘i authority, and was indeed a center of Shi‘i revolt and the cradle of
several Shi‘i sects. Umayyad governors used to subordinate the town to
Basra, where the governor was seated, to reduce its importance. Neverthe-
less, this did not prevent Kufa’s scholars from playing a major role in the
creation of the Arabic language, the development of Muslim culture, and
the shaping of its theology.
5
DJAIT, al-Kufa, p. 9, 47, 66-67, 84, 96-99, 217-220, 270.
The hypothesis that Kufa was much more important in early medieval
Islam than it is today needs clarification. Since the town was first of all
“the capital of ‘Ali” we should obviously search for evidence in Shi‘i
literature. But before turning to that literature, we must note that some
traces of the censored traditions concerning the religious importance of
Kufa can still be found in Sunni sources. The famous historian al-™abari,
in his description of the deluge in his Tarikh, notes that the oven that
boiled in the deluge, mentioned in the Qur’an (Hud [11]: 40), was located
in Kufa and that it was the place from which the water came out6. More
details are given by the Andalusian geographer al-Bakri (d. 487/1094),
who explains that Kufa, also called Kufan, was the house of Noah and
that he built the town’s mosque7.
The choice of Kufa was not based on merely military needs; the area
had religious significance. According to al-™abari, Salman al-Farisi and
Îudhayfa ibn al-Yaman, who were sent before the Muslim army to the
region in the year 17/638, were impressed by three monasteries in the
location and decided to pray there and to thank God for finding the
place8. Kufa was founded next to Îira, the capital of the buffer kingdom
of the Lakhmids, who were Nestorian Christians. Centuries before Islam,
Îira was a seat of Nestorian Catholicons and the location of monasteries
containing their tombs9. In addition, on the territory of the future Sawad
(cultivated region) al-Kufa, Arab pagan tribes organized an alternative
to the Ka‘ba (the Ka‘ba of Sindad near the fortress of Khawarnaq; see
below). It is interesting to note the involvement of two elements, Nesto-
rian Christian and Sassanian Persian, in the building of the Great Mosque
of Kufa, the Jami‘, under Umayyad rule, since this mosque was going to
take the place of previous Christian and jahili pagan sanctuaries. Accord-
ing to al-™abari, the first mosque of Kufa, founded in the time of the
caliph ‘Umar, was built using marble pillars of Sassanian Christian
churches (probably Nestorian). The renovated mosque from the time of
the governor Ziyad was built by architects who were known as “archi-
tects of the jahiliyya” well acquainted with Persian buildings10.
6
AL-™ABARI,
Tarikh, vol. 1, p. 61.
7
AL-BAKRI,
Mu‘jam ma ista‘jam, vol. 3. p. 1142.
8
AL-™ABARI, Tarikh, vol. 2, p. 679. DJAIT, al-Kufa, p. 68. The monastries are Dayr
Îurqa, Dayr Umm ‘Amr and Dayr Silsila; they are not mentioned in other sources.
9
SHAHID, Hira, p. 462-463; MORONEY, Iraq, p. 334-342.
10
AL-™ABARI, Tarikh, vol. 2, p. 681.
11
AL-QAZWINI, Athar al-bilad, p. 250-259. Al-Qazwini uses the term fa∂a’il when
praising the town. Since he is a Sunni scholar, his book also includes negative opinions
(i.e. mathalib) referring to the town and its inhabitants. Al-Sahla mosque is also called the
mosque of Banu Åafr and the Suhayl mosque. It is located 2 km northwest of the Great
Mosque of Kufa. Between the two mosques the Kunasa area is found.The Sahla and the
Great Mosque were built in the middle of the 7th century and are among the oldest Muslim
mosques.
12
YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 4, p. 559-560.
the Ìajj? Or did the two governors only intend to compete with the
churches of Îira? The sources do not reveal the real motives behind their
glorification of the mosque of Kufa. Nevertheless, it was a Shi‘i messi-
anic revolt that eventually turned Kufa into an alternative to Mecca.
This exceptional period of revolt and the interruption of the Ìajj raised
theories among researchers as to the possibility that, in this specific
period, the sanctuary of Jerusalem was chosen by the Umayyads as a
temporary replacement for Mecca, or more accurately as an alternative
center of pilgrimage for the Muslims until the revolt ended. The main
source for this theory is the explicit claim of the Shi‘i historian al-
Ya‘qubi (d. 274/897). According to the same theory, it was during this
period that the fa∂a’il Bayt al-Maqdis (merits of Jerusalem) literature
was probably composed to glorify Jerusalem’s sanctity13. As to Kufa,
its Great Mosque was built earlier, around twenty years before al-AqÒa
and, as Shi‘i traditions confirm, it raised negative sentiments rather than
admiration among the Shi‘i community. Several traditions (see below)
predict the destruction of this mosque as a sign of the return of the mahdi
(lit. the guided one, the Messiah). Although the Umayyads tried to glo-
rify this mosque, as shown by Yaqut’s description, we can suppose that
the mosque did not turn into a site of Ìajj, since the Muslim historians
are silent concerning the religious role of Kufa at the time of the revolt of
Ibn Zubayr in Mecca. Such a replacement, if explicitly declared, would
serve Sunni polemic against the Shi‘ites later on. Hence, the claim of
al-Ya‘qubi, that the Umayyads had turned the Dome of the Rock into a
site of Ìajj, remained unchallenged by any Sunni scholar pointing at
Kufa. Nevertheless, it would also be wrong to assume that Kufa did not
play a significant role in this period.
Iraq was also detached from the Îijaz until ‘Abdallah ibn Zubayr was
able to take it over in 68/687. Jerusalem could serve in this situation as
an alternative Ìajj destination for the Syrian Muslims and for the Umayyad
rulers, but certainly could not provide an alternative for the Iraqi Muslims,
because of their profound hostility to Syria and its authority. Thus, it
would be logical to assume that in the period of the revolt in Mecca, Shi‘i
13
GOLDZIHER, Muslim Studies, vol. 2, p. 44-45; ELAD, Medieval Jerusalem, p. 147-
173; See KISTER, A Study of an Early Tradition, p. 173-196; LIVNE-KAFRI, The Early
Shi‘a, see bibliography, p. 112-113 note 1. See also another view concerning this issue:
GOITEIN, Historical Background.
religious sentiments for Kufa, “the capital of ‘Ali”, were increased to the
point of turning it into a short-term solution for the interrupted Ìajj in
Mecca. As is shown below, Imami sources contain evidence that the
pilgrimage to Kufa was considered a Ìajj. This belief was eminent among
extremist Shi‘ites (Kaysanis, Ghulat and Ba†inis). The available sources
indicate that Kufa would not replace Mecca until the advent of the mahdi.
Thus, the only way Kufa could turn into an alternative to Mecca in the
time of the revolt would be the belief that the days of the appearance of
the mahdi had come.
Indeed, during the revolt of Ibn Zubayr in Iraq, a messianic movement
was already organizing another revolt in Kufa to avenge the blood of
Îusayn, the martyr of Karbala’. There is no doubt that the Shi‘i revolt of
al-Mukhtar ibn ‘Ubayd in Kufa between the years 66/685 and 68/687
intensified the messianic beliefs attributed to Kufa. According to a famous
tradition, al-Mukhtar predicted that the sign of the Messiah’s advent
would be the destruction of the Great Mosque of Kufa, beginning with
the wall facing the house of the famous scholar ‘Abdallah ibn Mas‘ud14.
It was from the Great Mosque of Kufa that al-Mukhtar first announced
his intentions to rebel in the name of MuÌammad ibn al-Îanafiyya,
Îusayn’s half-brother, whom he considered to be the mahdi15. From then
on, Kufa’s religious significance in Shi‘i belief was always associated
with the return of the mahdi. Al-Mukhtar’s tomb in the town is still a site
of pilgrimage16.
Livne-Kafri, dealing with the question of the sanctity of Jerusalem in
Shi‘ism, explains the status of Kufa in the context of the holy cities in
Islam and suggests that the traditions that praise Kufa represent the Iraqi
hostility to the Umayyads17. Although this hypothesis is acceptable, it
should be noted that there are still traces of fa∂a’il al-Kufa in Sunni lit-
erature and also several traditions praising Jerusalem in Shi‘i sources, a
phenomenon that deserves further study. The hostility to the Umayyads
was only one motive for the composition of the fa∂a’il al-Kufa and prob-
ably not the main one. Rather, it is likely that in the period of the revolt
14
AL-MUFID,Kitab al-irshad, vol. 2, p. 375; AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 3, p. 55.
15
AL-MAJLISI,
BiÌar al-anwar, vol 45, p. 357.
16
IBN BA™™U™A, TuÌfat al-nuÂÂar, vol. 3, p. 55. According to Ibn Ba††u†a (14th century)
the tomb of al-Mukhtar is situated in Kufa but not in the city’s mosque. Nevertheless,
according to the Shi‘i Sayyid BaÌr al-‘Ulum (18th century) al-Mukhtar’s tomb was located
in his period inside the Great Mosque near the tomb of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil, cousin of al-
Îusayn ibn ‘Ali, but BaÌr al-‘Ulum admits that the location of his tomb was unknown in
the past. See BAÎR AL-‘ULUM AL-™ABA™ABA’I, al-Fawa’id al-rijaliyya, p. 96. This location
is accepted nowadays among Shi‘i authorities.
17
LIVNE-KAFRI, The Early Shi‘a, p. 114-116.
in Mecca, in order to harm Ibn Zubayr and to prevent the pilgrims from
giving him their bay‘a (oath of allegiance), the Umayyads, led by the
caliph ‘Abd al-Malik, encouraged the composition of the fa∂a’il literature
to praise Jerusalem. At the same time, Îusayn’s martyrdom created in
Kufa a messianic movement led by Mukhtar, which expected the return
of the mahdi in his time. This return was believed to be to Kufa, accord-
ing to ‘Ali’s prediction (see tradition below). Thus, two alternatives to
Mecca were created, in Iraq and in Syria, one by the Umayyads and the
other by the Shi‘ites. It may be assumed that the fa∂a’il literature of
both Jerusalem and Kufa was composed in this period, some of it simi-
lar and some different, since each of them represented a particular local
religious background. The merits of Kufa may have preceded those
of Jerusalem, since the Great Mosque of Kufa was erected before the
mosques of Jerusalem and it was already a sanctuary in the period of
‘Ali. While the Umayyad leaders planned to use Jerusalem as a tempo-
rary alternative to Mecca until they could conquer it from Ibn Zubayr,
the status of Kufa was intended to change forever, since ‘Ali promised
that the mahdi’s return to the town would turn it into the focus of all
subsequent mystical events.
It is important to note at this point another factor emphasizing the
prominence of Kufa in this specific period. In the second half of the
7th century, Kufa was believed to be the site of ‘Ali’s tomb18 and for his
followers it was still the only holy site in Iraq, since the shrines of the
later Shi‘i Imams did not yet exist. The murder of Îusayn ibn ‘Ali three
years before the rebellion of Ibn Zubayr was too fresh to turn Karbala’
into a center of pilgrimage in place of Kufa19. It should also be added
that when speaking in general about Shi‘ism in this early period of Islam,
18
There are several traditions concerning the location of ‘Ali’s tomb. It is believed
that his followers did not reveal the exact place in order to keep his body safe. Some Shi‘i
tradition locates the grave in Kufa and others in Najaf. The latter is the most common
tradition today, and there is also a tradition saying that he was buried in a cave in the
outskirts of Kufa. In these traditions it was his elder son Îasan who buried him. See for
example: AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 456, 458. See several versions concerning his
grave in Sunni sources, for example: IBN KATHIR, al-Bidaya wa-al-nihaya, vol. 8, p. 14.
Ibn Taymiyya, the famous Îanbali scholar, noted that ‘Ali is buried in Kufa not in Najaf;
see KISTER, Sanctity Joint and Divided, p. 24.
19
See, for, example a late tradition that maintains that the pilgrimage to the Imam
Îusayn in Karbala’ was a Ìajj: AL-ÎURR AL-‘AMILI, Wasa’il al-Shi‘a, vol. 6, p. 79. The
first time Shi‘i believers from Kufa are described visiting the tomb of Îusayn is the visit
of Sulayman ibn al-∑ard and his fighters in 65/684, on their way to Syria to avenge
Îusayn’s murder. According to Shi‘i sources, they wept near his tomb and “were crowded
like the crowd in the Ka‘ba”, but at this early stage of Shi‘i history this visit was only an
act of mourning and an expression of regret and sorrow before their own inevitable death,
not a ritual of pilgrimage. See AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 45, p. 359.
20
IBN AL-KALBI, Kitab al-aÒnam, p. 45.
21
YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 3, p. 302-303. See also: IBN HISHAM, al-Sira al-
Nabawiyya, vol. 1, p. 213. In a poem, A‘sha ibn Qays praises this sanctuary, mentioning
the water of the Euphrates flowing to it (see the religious significance of this water
below).
22
IBN AL-KALBI, Kitab al-aÒnam, p. 45; IBN KATHIR, al-Bidaya wa-al-nihaya, vol. 2,
p. 289-290.
23
IBN ABI AL-ÎADID, SharÌ nahj al-balagha, vol. 17, p. 252.
24
The Khawarnaq fortress had special significance because it was founded by the
Lakhmid al-Nu‘man, son of the well-known Imru’ al-Qays. According to several sources,
it was lived in by ‘Ali during his caliphate; see, for example: AL-SUHAYLI, al-Raw∂ al-
unuf, Cairo, 1971, p. 156.
25
AL-™USI, Tahdhib al-aÌkam, vol. 3, p. 161.
26
For an explicit indication of the existence of the genre of “the virtues of Kufa’s
mosque”, see YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 4, p. 559. References to Sunni sources in
the following traditions are also offered when available.
27
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 396.
28
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 2.
29
Ibidem, p. 11-12.
Khusraw [the Persian king], Nu‘man [ibn Mundhir, king of the Lakhmids]
and eventually by Ziyad [the Umayyad governor]30. This anachronistic
tradition makes the king of the Lakhmids, who lived a century before
Islam, envy the mosque of Kufa, since it competes with the Christian
sanctuary of Îira31.
d. Noah built his boat in the mosque of Kufa before the deluge. Noah
took the grave of Adam in his boat from Mecca to Kufa, where the water
of the deluge went out and returned32.
e. The sixth Imam, Ja‘far al-∑adiq (d. 148/765), said: In Kufa are
situated the tombs of Noah, Abraham, three hundred and seventy other
prophets, six hundred legatees [awÒiya’, sing. wasi] and ‘Ali the master
of the legatees 33.
f. The Sahla mosque in Kufa (other traditions concern the Great
Mosque of Kufa) was the house of Idris (Enoch), the place where Abra-
ham stayed before his attack against the Amalekites and from which
David launched his attack against Goliath34. These traditions leave no
doubt as to their reference to the city’s role as a base of attack against the
enemies of the Shi‘ites (for example, ‘Ali against Mu‘awiyya, Mukhtar
against Ibn Ziyad).
g. According to Shi‘i interpretation, the four Qur’anic symbols, “the
fig, the olive, Mount Sinai and the city of security” (Qur’an, al-Tin 95:1),
refer to the four most sacred cities in Islam: Medina, Jerusalem, Kufa
and Mecca35. It should be noted that in this tradition Kufa is identified
30
AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 8, p. 279. According to al-Majlisi, the foundations of the
original mosque were altered from their original position and the new mosque, built by
the “heretical caliphs” (i.e. the Umayyads) deviated from the qibla (the direction of the
prayer to Mecca) by forty degrees to the right; see AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97,
p. 433-434. According to one tradition, ‘Ali ibn Mahziyar dreamt that the mahdi was
revealed to him and told him that at the end of time he intended to destroy the mosque of
Kufa and to rebuild it as it was originally; see ibidem, vol. 54, p. 104.
31
The most famous tradition of the attempt of Christian leaders to compete with
Mecca as a pilgrimage center for the Arabs in the Jahiliyya, is that of Abraha who built a
great church in San‘a’, Yemen, for this purpose. See AL-™ABARI, Tarikh, vol. 1, p. 263-
266.
32
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 2; AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 6, p. 23.
33
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 5; AL-ÎURR AL-‘AMILI, Wasa’il al-Shi‘a, vol. 14,
p. 387.
34
AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 3, p. 494. See also this tradition mentioned in Sunni
sources by the Iranian geographer al-Qazwini: AL-QAZWINI, Athar al-bilad, p. 251. The
Sahla mosque is held in such high esteem that to pray there is considered to be like
praying in the tent of the Prophet MuÌammad; see AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97,
p. 435.
35
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 96, p. 96, 383; vol. 97, p. 392. As to these four
sacred mosques (al-masjid al-Ìaram, masjid al-Madina, al-masjid al-aqÒa and masjid
al-Kufa), see also: ibidem, vol. 97, p. 396.
with Mount Sinai, where, according to Judaism, the Torah was revealed
(Exodus 18-40). Also the verse, “We have made the son of Mary [Jesus]
and his mother a model [for the believers] and We gave them both refuge
on high ground, a place of rest, security and flowing streams” (Qur’an,
al-Mu’minun 23:50) is explained as a description of Kufa, its mosque
and the Euphrates river36.
h. Ja‘far al-∑adiq said concerning the mosque of Kufa: if people knew
its merit, they would come to it, even crawling on snow; it contains in its
south [the door of Kinda] the sanctuaries of Abraham and that of the
angel Gabriel; there is no prophet or pious believer who did not pray in
this place. Even the Prophet MuÌammad during his Night Journey asked
the angel Gabriel to stop and to pray there [see below]; to pray there is
an obligation [fari∂a] which is equal to a thousand prayers in another
mosque and an optional prayer there is worth five hundred prayers else-
where37.
i. A tradition attributed to Ja‘far explicitly defines Kufa as a holy city:
Mecca is the Ìaram [holy place] of God, Medina is the Ìaram of the
Prophet MuÌammad and Kufa is the Ìaram of ‘Ali38.
j. Salman al-Farisi, the companion of the Prophet MuÌammad and
the first Persian converted to Islam, said that Kufa is the qubbat al-
Islam [dome of Islam] and at the end of time everybody will long
for it39.
k. The water of the Euphrates flowing to Kufa is sacred, since it flows
from heaven40. For this reason the Imam Ja‘far said that whoever drinks
from this water would be cured from sickness41.
36
AL-ÎURR AL-‘AMILI, Wasa‘il al-Shi‘a, vol. 14, p. 361; on p. 405 the “high ground”
is interpreted as Najaf al-Kufa and in AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 94, p. 232 as Îirat
al-Kufa. The latter source says that some interpret it as Ramla in Filas†in (Palestine, south
Syria), Damascus, Cairo or Jerusalem.
37
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 3. Concerning the Prophet MuÌammad’s stop in Kufa
to pray in the middle of the night journey, see also: AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97,
p. 405. According to other traditions, the prayer in Kufa is worth a thousand prayers
elsewhere; see, for example: ibidem, p. 397. Haider noted that several traditions are asso-
ciated with both the mosque of Kufa and al-Sahla mosque; see HAIDER, Prayer, Mosque,
and Pilgrimages, p. 165, note 61.
38
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 8; AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 96, p. 242.
39
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 101, 110.
40
AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 6, p. 388; AL-ÎURR AL-‘AMILI, Wasa’il al-Shi‘a, vol. 13,
p. 361. See in a Sunni source: AL-QAZWINI, Athar al-Bilad, p. 421.
41
AL-™USI, Tahdhib al-aÌkam, vol. 6, p. 39. Sindawi mentions a Shi‘i tradition which
says that in the time of Noah, because of the sins of the inhabitants of Mecca, the water
of the Zamzam turned salty, and the pure water was transferred into the Euphrates. See
SINDAWI, Between the Two Gharis of Kufa, p. 138-139.
42
AL-MAJLISI,
BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 405, 437.
43
AL-BURAQI,
Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 25, 27.
44
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 2-3; KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 3, p. 494; AL-MAJLISI,
BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 389. This tradition is cited also by the Iranian Sunni al-Qazwini;
see AL-QAZWINI, Athar al-bilad, p. 250. According to Shi‘i tradition, the rod of Moses was
transmitted from Adam to Jethro, from him to Moses, then to the Imams and eventually
to the mahdi and it remains green and fresh as it was in the day it was taken from heaven.
The rod does whatever it is ordered to do; see AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 13, p. 45.
According to another Shi‘i tradition, on the day of judgment, the mahdi will use the rod
of Moses to reveal the believers and the ring of Solomon to reveal the sinners; see ibidem,
vol. 6, p. 301-303.
of the messenger of God. Then the man asked his view concerning
the mosque of al-AqÒa [in Jerusalem], and the Imam replied that it is in
heaven [fi al-sama’], thus giving an explanation of the term AqÒa [most
remote], since the Night Journey was to the “most remote mosque”,
not to the earthly Jerusalem. When the man told him that people were
associating this mosque with Jerusalem, he answered: “Kufa is better
than it45”.
45
In Arabic: masjid al-Kufa af∂al minhu; see AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 5; AL-
MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 405.
46
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 4; AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 400. The
Arabic text leaves no place for doubts: al-salat al-maktuba fihi Ìijja [a synonym for Ìajj]
mabrura wa-al-nafila ‘umra mabrura. The same phrase is also attributed in the Shi‘i lit-
erature to Ja‘far’s father, the Imam MuÌammad al-Baqir, see AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa,
p. 29; and even to the Prophet MuÌammad himself, see ibidem, p. 27; AL-HURR AL-
‘AMILI, Wasa‘il al-Shi‘a, vol. 5, p. 256-258.
47
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 96, p. 72.
48
Ibidem, vol. 97, p. 236.
49
Ibidem, vol. 97, p. 400.
50
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 5; AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 96, p. 83, 377.
51
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 385.
52
Ibidem, vol. 52, p. 390.
53
This tradition appears in several Sunni sources, for example: AL-SUYU™I, al-Îawi
li-al-fatawa, vol. 2, p. 67.
54
The most important line in ‘Ali’s speech is: la tadhhabu al-ayyam wa-al-layali
Ìatta yunÒabu al-Ìajar al-aswad fihi (not many days and nights will pass until the Black
Stone will be placed in it); see AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 6, 28-29, 83; AL-ÎURR AL-
‘AMILI, Wasa’il al-Shi‘a, vol. 5, p. 658. As to the tradition that Kufa will be the place of
the Ìashr (the gathering at the end of time), see also: AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 83.
It is interesting to compare this with an Umayyad tradition concerning the carrying of the
Ka‘ba with the Black Stone to Jerusalem in the time of the mahdi “like the bringing of a
bride in the wedding [to her husband]”; see for example: AL-‘UMARI, Masalik al-abÒar,
vol. 1, p. 207. LIVNE-KAFRI, Burial in the Holy Land, p. 421. These two traditions, con-
cerning the carrying of the Black Stone to Jerusalem and to Kufa, are not equivalent at
all. They use different terminology in Arabic, and in the case of Kufa the Stone is carried
without the Ka‘ba, which will be replaced by the mosque of ‘Ali at the end of time.
55
See additional traditions concerning Kufa, in KISTER, Sanctity Joint and Divided,
p. 31-36.
56
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 434.
57
Ibidem, p. 435-436. Moshe Gil proposed to translate it as: “there were pictures of
the prophets”, see GIL, The Creed of Abu ‘Amir, p. 37-38. Contrary to our hypothesis, Gil
does not consider the green stone as more than a part of the cult of Idris/Enoch. Gil’s
translation contradicts the aniconism in Islam, the proscription of the creation of images
and in holy sites in particular. Moreover, Gil’s translation also does not fit the proportions
of the small mosque of al-Sahla, since Muslim tradition speaks of thousands of prophets,
120,000 according to one tradition (the Qur’an mentions 25 prophets and another 10 are
mentioned in the QiÒaÒ al-Anbiya’ literature). See FRIEDMAN, The Nusayri-‘Alawis, p. 93.
The expression “picture of every prophet [from Adam to Jesus]” appears in medieval
geographic literature only once, in the description of the great Church of Rome, where the
huge space does indeed allow for the presence of such a number of pictures. In this case
Gil’s translation would fit. See YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 2, p. 367. Nor do we accept
the translation of Haider: “the marks of every prophet” which does not fit the terms in
Arabic. See HAIDER, Prayer, Mosque, and Pilgrimages, p. 165. In the case of the Sahla
mosque, the green stone should be understood as a mystical phenomenon, a belief that the
green stone enables the sight of every prophet. According to Ibn Faqih al-Hamadhani, a
10th century geographer, the green stone was a yaqut (precious stone), a term also used to
describe the Black Stone, yaqut min yawaqit al-janna (stone from the precious stones of
heaven); see AL-HAMADHANI, Kitab al-buldan, p. 210.
58
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 436. It could have been claimed that this
tradition placed the green stone of Kufa as the opposite of the Quranic sijjin (Qur’an,
al-Mu†affifin 83:8), since it is explained by some commentaries as a green stone placed
in the bottom of the seventh earth, covering hell in Sunni traditions. Nevertheless, this
is a Sunni description of the sijjin that we could not find in Shi‘i sources. On the con-
trary, Shi‘i traditions do not describe this stone covering hell as a green one and some
place it under Jerusalem, not Kufa; see for example: AL-MAJLISI, Bihar al-anwar, vol. 7,
p. 116.
59
Ibidem, vol. 97, p. 437.
60
Ibidem.
61
See for example in Genesis Rabbah, 31:11. I would like to thank Professor Marc
Bregman, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, for contributing this important
note.
62
AL-ÎILLI, Kitab al-aman, p. 86.
after the Prophet’s death will be saved from hell and led to paradise63.
Thus, we should not be surprised to find a tradition relating that when
Îasan buried his father ‘Ali in the location that he had instructed him to,
he found on a plane tree an inscription saying: “Preserved from Noah to
‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib” (iddakhara NuÌ li-‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib)64.
In BiÌar al-anwar, al-Majlisi concludes his chapter on the “Merits
of Kufa” with the statement that unfortunately the Masjid al-Sahla/
Suhayl, like most of the holy sites of the town, was destroyed in his
period (17th century)65. Djait, in his book about Kufa, explains that the
town contained hundreds of mosques in the Middle Ages, more than any
city in the medieval Muslim empire. All these mosques, together with the
rest of the town, were destroyed by Bedouin invasions, such as that of the
Qarma†ians, which is discussed later. Thus, Djait justly maintains that
“the town which was established by Arabs was destroyed by Arabs”66.
6. Burial at Kufa
The proximity to ‘Ali’s grave in Kufa (or Najaf) and the prophecies of
the advent of the mahdi in that city turned it into an attractive place for
burial. According to Shi‘i tradition, ‘Ali severely punished people who
moved the body of a Muslim who had died in a rural region in order
to bury him in Kufa. He explained that this custom was similar to the
Jewish tradition of carrying people who died to burial in Jerusalem.
Nevertheless, this ritual became widespread in Shi‘ism67.
‘Ali’s prohibition may indicate that already in his caliphate (7th century)
people considered Kufa a holy city. However, it seems more plausible
that this tradition reflects an attempt to limit the custom of burial near
63
See for example: AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 23, p. 144; vol. 254, p. 254.
64
Ibidem, vol. 42, p. 224. Sindawi notes that according to Shi‘i traditions, the grave
in Ghari contains the remains of 370 prophets, including Noah. According to Sunni
sources, Noah’s grave is in Mecca; see SINDAWI, Between the Two Gharis of Kufa, p. 132-
135.
65
Ibidem, vol. 97, p. 438.
66
H. DJAIT, al-Kufa, p. 297-299, 330. Djait provides a list of mosques in Kufa (p. 298-
299), in which the Masjid al-Sahla is identified with the mosque of the tribe of ‘Abd
al-Qays.
67
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 79, p. 66. The well-known Shi‘i scholar Ibn
Tawus (d. 664/1266) from Îilla asked to be buried after his death in Najaf, where his
parents were also buried; see KOHLBERG, A Medieval Muslim, p. 4, 14 note 91. Shi‘i
Muslims still ask to be buried in Najaf today; see for example: VERTESALJI, Supralocal
Cemeteries, p. 195. The jurist al-Khu’i (d. 1992) stated that those buried in Najaf will
not suffer in the grave due to their proximity to the Imam; see TAKIM, The Heirs of the
Prophet, p. 67-68.
Another belief which places Kufa at the center of the world because
the grave of ‘Ali is there was created among mystical Shi‘i circles. The
sanctity of Kufa was an important tenet among the Ghulat (extremist
admirers of ‘Ali), who developed the idea that ‘Ali was an exalted being.
According to their doctrine, certain divine powers were delegated to him
by God (by tafwi∂, delegation); in the opinion of some Ghulat groups he
was even God’s personification on earth. According to this mystical
belief, ‘Ali and his descendants, the Imams of the Shi‘a, were considered
the spiritual qibla, the object of sanctity that every believer should turn
to, body and soul.
An allegorical interpretation of the term qibla (direction of prayer) is
also known in some ∑ufi orders who replace the Ka‘ba in Mecca with a
human qibla. The ∑ufi qibla is a spiritual leader from whom the believers
ask for guidance71. In Shi‘ism the spiritual leader is the Imam. For exam-
ple, the eighth Imam, ‘Ali al-Ri∂a (d. 203/818), was called “the seventh
qibla”, a nickname used by the Persian theologian NaÒir al-Din al-™usi
68
LIVNE-KAFRI, Burial in the Holy Land, p. 417-425.
69
Ibidem, p. 420.
70
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 79, p. 233.
71
See, for example, on the terminology of the Naqshbandiyya order, BUEHLER, Sufi
Heirs, p. 155. See also the biography of the eleventh-century Persian Shaykh Abu ‘l-‘Abbas
QaÒÒab, in RAVAN FARHADI, ‘Abdullah AnÒari of Herat, p. 52.
72
AMIR-MOEZZI, La religion discrète, p. 261-262, 292.
73
Concerning the NuÒayri (today called Alawi) sect, which began in Iraq and migrated
to Syria, see FRIEDMAN, The Nusayri-‘Alawi.
74
See in NuÒayri writings, for example: AL-JILLI, Kitab ba†in al-Òalat.
75
In NuÒayri literature the Ìajj is condemned: in al-Adhani’s Kitab al-majmu‘, in
the fourth chapter, called al-Bayt al-ma‘mur (the house which is the object of pilgrimage)
he explains that the Imam Ja‘far equated the Ìajj with the worship of a stone and that Ibn
NuÒayr, eponym of the sect, denounced it; see AL-ADHANI, Kitab al-bakura al-Sulaymaniyya,
p. 30-32.
76
VIRANI, The Isma‘ilis, p. 150-153.
77
AMIR-MOEZZI (ed.), Le voyage initiatique, p. 53.
78
See, for example: AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 493. Concerning tayy al-ar∂
(lit. folding up of earth), a virtue attributed to the Imams in Shi‘ism, see AMIR-MOEZZI,
La religion discrète, p. 268-269.
79
See SIVAN, The Fa∂a’il al-Quds, p. 263-271.
80
MIRZA ÎUSAYN NURI, Mustadrak al-wasa’il, vol. 3, p. 399.
81
AL-MAJLISI, Bihar al-anwar, vol. 42, p. 338. The usual explanation is that ‘Ali’s
children were afraid that his body would be harmed by the Umayyads or the Khawarij;
see, for example: ibidem, vol. 97, p. 235-236. See Sindawi’s discussion of the Ghari, the
grave of ‘Ali and its Jahili background, in SINDAWI, Between the Two Gharis of Kufa,
p. 111-151. According to Sindawi, the Ghari was built by the Lakhmid al-Mundhir at the
end of the 6th century as a grave. According to Muslim sources, the site was used for a
pagan cult of human sacrifice. See also AL-HAMADHANI, Kitab al-buldan, p. 214-217.
The expectations of the return of the mahdi did not stop after al-
Mukhtar’s death; they were kept by the Kaysaniyya movement, which
followed his path secretly. Several messianic sects, who were disap-
pointed with the results of the ‘Abbasid revolution, still existed among
Shi‘i circles of mystics in Kufa between the 8th and 10th centuries. Such
groups, mainly Ba†ini-Isma‘ilis, were expecting the return of the mahdi
in their period. It was only a matter of time until one of these messianic
Shi‘i groups would turn the prophecy of the removal of the Black Stone
from the Ka‘ba to Kufa from theory to practice.
The historical episode of the stealing of the Black Stone of the Ka‘ba
appears in every medieval historical book, since it shocked the Muslim
community and proved how destructive fitna (war between Muslims) can
be. Abu ™ahir al-Jannabi (d. 333/944), leader of the Qarma†ian-Isma‘ilis
of BaÌrayn, believing the return of the mahdi to be very close, sacked
Mecca in 317/930, murdered the pilgrims, threw their bodies at the Ka‘ba
and into the Zamzam well and stole the Black Stone. The stone was taken
82
IBN ABI AL-ÎADID, SharÌ nahj al-balagha, vol. 7, p. 155-157.
83
According to al-™abari, the reason for the caliph’s gradual withdrawal from Kufa
was the unstable situation in its region due to the existence of sects and rebellious groups
such as the Rawandiyya; see AL-™ABARI, Tarikh, vol. 4, p. 1601.
to the Qarma†ian capital in AÌsa’, where it stayed until 339/951, the year
Abu ™ahir’s brothers brought it back, first to Kufa, then to Mecca84.
Until now, this event remains a mystery: why did the Qarma†ians steal
the Black Stone? And a more relevant question for our discussion: why
was the stone not returned directly to Mecca as expected, but to Kufa
first? Researchers are left with several contradictory answers given in
Sunni sources in light of the lack of original Qarma†ian sources85. We
suggest that the most reasonable explanation for these drastic Qarma†ian
acts, the stealing and the returning of the stone to Kufa, is simply the
famous prophecy of ‘Ali that the Black Stone would be returned to Kufa
at the end of time.
The Qarma†ians expected the advent of the mahdi in the form of
MuÌammad ibn Isma‘il, who was believed to be incarnated in a young
Persian in al-AÌsa‘ (BaÌrayn). The expectation for the end of time coin-
cided with astral signs as well as an old Zoroastrian prophecy of the
restoration of the reign of the Persian magians86. The young Persian who
was said to be a magian was discovered to be an impostor and was
executed, proving that the preparations for the end of time were in vain.
Shortly after the death of Abu ™ahir, leader of the Qarma†ians, the expec-
tation of the return of the mahdi was postponed.
Indeed, the Egyptian medieval historian al-Maqrizi (d. 846/1442), a
Sunni with Fa†imi roots, linked the Shi‘i prophecy of the return of the
Black Stone to Kufa and the act of the Qarma†ians87. The Sunni scholar
Badr al-Din al-‘Ayni (d. 855/1453) stated explicitly that: “forty camels
died carrying the stone from Mecca to Kufa; then he [Abu ™ahir], may God
84
IBN AL-ATHIR, al-Kamil fi al-tarikh, vol. 8, p. 207-208, 486; SUHAYL ZAKKAR, al-
Jami‘, p. 222-224; DAFTARY, The Assassin Legend, p. 21-22. Concerning astral signs of
the end of time, as predicted by the Qarma†ians, see IBN ™AHIR AL-BAGHDADI, al-Farq
bayna al-firaq, p. 272.
85
MADELUNG, The Fatimids, p. 45-49.
86
MADELUNG, Ëarma†i, p. 662. The messianic activity of the Qarma†ians and their
apocalyptic beliefs contradict the thesis of Faiza Akbar, that the objectives of the sect were
only political and economic and not religious; see AKBAR, The Secular Roots, p. 376-
390. In medieval as well as modern Islam, religious motives cannot be separated from
economic and political goals. In this context, it should be noted that the Black Stone has
more significance in Shi‘ism than in Sunnism. According to Shi‘i tradition, when ‘Umar
spoke about the Black Stone, saying that it was merely a stone, neither harmful nor useful,
‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib answered, that ‘Umar was wrong. According to ‘Ali, the Black Stone
was ordered to absorb the behavior of the Muslims during the Ìajj and to confess to God
concerning the believers’ loyalty; hence the Stone was both harmful and useful. See AL-
MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 39, p. 227-228.
87
AL-MAQRIZI, Itti‘a al-Ìunafa’, vol. 1, p. 6. al-Maqrizi does not attribute this
prophecy to ‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib, but to his grandson ‘Ali Zayn al-‘Abidin or to his son
MuÌammad.
curse him, hung the stone on the seventh pillar of the Great Mosque of
Kufa in its western corner, assuming that following this act the Ìajj would
turn to Kufa… then it was carried to Hajar [BaÌrayn]88”. The version of
the carrying of the stone directly from Mecca to Kufa is also mentioned
by Ibn Makula (d. 475/1082)89. This link between ‘Ali’s prophecy and the
Qarma†ian transfer of the Black Stone, was also made by the modern Shi‘i
scholar al-Buraqi (d. 1904), in his important Tarikh al-Kufa90.
In his research on the Qarma†ians, Farhad Daftary concluded that
their decision to return the Black Stone was a result of neither the pro-
posed ransom of the caliph of Baghdad nor the letter from the Fa†imi
caliph demanding its return. The first claim was intended to blame the
sect for greed and the second was illogical in the light of the theological
differences between Qarma†ians and Fa†imis as well as the autonomous
nature of the Qarma†ians. All these explanations appear in hostile Sunni
sources91. The Qarma†ian hung the stone in the Great Mosque of Kufa
“so that everybody would see it”, writes the historian Ibn al-Athir,
without further explanation. The Black Stone was placed exactly where,
some two centuries earlier, ‘Ali had delivered his prophecy. It was prob-
ably hung in the mosque to demonstrate where it would be placed in
the time of the mahdi. After a while the Qarma†ians returned it from its
holy location to what they considered its earthly and temporary place,
in Mecca92.
Before these events took place, during the six days of the pillage of Kufa
in 312/924 by the Qarma†ians, Ibn al-Athir describes bizarre visits to the
great mosque of the city by Abu ™ahir, every day until the evening93. The
mysterious activity of the Qarma†ian leader in the mosque of Kufa, only
six years before he stole the Black Stone, may also support the assumption
that the sect was planning to fulfill ‘Ali’s prophecy. The Qarma†ians had
had strong roots in Kufa from the time Îamdan Qarma† had founded the
sect there a century earlier94. Abu ™ahir also treated Kufan Shi‘ites better
than other Muslims, accepting their offer of protection of the pilgrims95.
88
AL-‘AYNI, ‘Umdat al-qari’, vol. 9, p. 242.
89
IBN MAKULA, al-Ikmal, vol. 4, p. 36.
90
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 83.
91
DAFTARY, The Assassin Legends, p. 21-22, 138; IDEM, Isma‘ilis, p. 823-832.
92
Abu ™ahir is said to recite a poem emphasizing that the Ìajj to Mecca represents the
state of jahiliyya; see AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 84.
93
IBN AL-ATHIR, al-Kamil fi al-tarikh, vol. 8, p. 156. See also the same description by
the historian Thabit ibn Sinan (d. 365/976), in SUHAYL ZAKKAR, al-Jami‘, p. 217.
94
IBN MUSA AL-NAWBAKHTI, Firaq al-Shi‘a, p. 72-76; DAFTARY, Isma‘ilis, p. 832.
95
IBN AL-ATHIR, al-Kamil fi al-tarikh, vol. 8, p. 311; HALM, The Empire of the Mahdi,
p. 383-384.
The famous tradition that “Kufa is the dome of Islam and the place of
migration” is mentioned in Shi‘i as well as Sunni sources. Most of the
Sunni sources give the same title to Medina, explaining that this is the
96
SUHAYL ZAKKAR, al-Jami‘ fi akhbar al-Qarami†a, p. 301.
97
See for example: AL-MAJLISI, Bihar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 392-393. The seventh
pillar is also called “the sanctuary of Abraham” and it is the place of the prayer of the
angels on Judgment Day, see AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, vol. 3, p. 493.
98
According to Ibn Makula the Qarma†ian who was ordered to hang the Stone on
the seventh pillar was named Rakhma; see IBN MAKULA, al-Ikmal, vol. 4, p. 36. Accord-
ing to a Sunni source, when the Black Stone was hung in the mosque of Kufa, people
cried in excitement, “Allahu akbar” (God is greater), because they knew that ‘Ali’s
prophecy concerning the hanging of the Black Stone on the seventh pillar by a black man
named Rakhma had been fulfilled; see IBN MAKRAM IBN MANÅUR, MukhtaÒar, vol. 7,
p. 65 (biography of al-Îasan ibn MuÌammad al-Ma’umm). This accurate prophecy also
appears in Shi‘i sources; see for example AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 40, p. 191; IBN
ABI AL-ÎADID, SharÌ nahj al-balagha, p. 13-14.
99
YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 2, p. 258-259. See a similar description in AL-
QAZWINI, Athar al-bilad, p. 118.
100
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa, p. 83. Several sources report that the returned Black
Stone was severely damaged; see for example: IBN MAÎMUD AL-ALUSI, Jala’ al-aynayn,
vol. 1, p.146; AL-SUYU™I, Tarikh al-khulafa’, vol. 1, p. 345.
title given to a place from which the Muslim empire is ruled101. It can be
assumed that when Kufa became the capital of the empire, it was given
the title that Medina had, “the dome of Islam”. But the transfer of title
“land of the migration” to Kufa demands an explanation.
It is ‘Ali’s transfer of the capital from Medina to Kufa which gave his
new capital the title of dar al-hijra102, since his migration was as impor-
tant as that of the Prophet MuÌammad to Medina at the dawn of Islam.
The tactic of hijra represents migration from a place of weakness to
another place that enables him to return triumphant. MuÌammad migrated
to Medina in 622 after being persecuted by the Quraysh tribe, created a
new Ìaram in Medina and after eight years returned to Mecca victorious
and became the leader of the Arabian Peninsula. ‘Ali’s hijra to Kufa had
a similar goal, migrating to a new place where he would become power-
ful enough to rule the Muslim empire. Kufa also became the tomb and
the Ìaram of ‘Ali, in the same way that Medina became the tomb and
the Ìaram of the Prophet MuÌammad. Whether ‘Ali intended to return
to Medina or keep Kufa as his capital is unknown, since he was mur-
dered before fulfilling his goal of becoming the caliph of all the empire.
However, ‘Ali brought the term hijra to his followers and even the group
of the Khawarij who left his camp and revolted against him used this
term. A Shi‘i tradition speaks about three hijras (al-hijar al-thalath) in
Islam: that of Îabasha (Ethiopia), that of Medina and that of Kufa103.
The Isma‘ilis, developing the Shi‘i term hijra, called every one of their
cells dar al-hijra, following the same tactic of migration and founding
bases for attack104. One of them was the fortified dar al-hijra near al-
AÌsa’ of the Qarma†ians of BaÌrayn105. They left Kufa for BaÌrayn in
order to become powerful enough to conquer Baghdad. The removal of
the Black Stone was an important part of their messianic ambition.
The founder of the NuÒayri sect, al-Îusayn ibn Îamdan al-KhaÒibi106,
who was alive at the time the Black Stone was stolen, dedicated several
lines to Kufa in his Diwan. Some of these rhymes sum up Shi‘i mystical
101
See for example: AL-∑ALIÎI AL-SHAMI, Subul al-huda, vol. 3, p. 286, 288, 291;
AL-HINDI, Kanz al-‘ummal, vol. 12, p. 230. While both Kufa and Medina are called in
Arabic Qubbat al-Islam (dome of Islam) and dar al-hijra (house of the immigration),
Medina is also called ar∂ al-hijra (land of the migration). See the term hijra in WATT,
Hidjra, p. 367.
102
Kufa appears in several Shi‘i sources as ‘Ali’s dar al-hijra; see, for example: AL-
MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 41, p. 41; vol. 44, p. 66; vol. 53, p. 20.
103
Ibidem, vol. 35, p. 201.
104
HODGSON, The Isma‘ili State, p. 439-440.
105
DAFTARY, The Isma‘ilis, p. 162.
106
FRIEDMAN, Al-Îusayn ibn Îamdan al-KhaÒibi, p. 91-112.
beliefs concerning the dar al-hijra, the Black Stone and other traditions
related to Kufa:
Kufa of the righteous home of the waÒi [legatee, i.e. ‘Ali]/
and his hijra that is the home of peace
All the prophets and the messengers/
[came] to it and stayed in it
There the Imam ‘Ali , peace upon him, is found/
Turning it into his home in favor of the honorable ones
For his Shi‘a, for his supporters/
Who are united after the leader
And for the humans as well as the jinnis [spirits, supernatural creatures] of
pure light/
And [for those who] became exalted from the darkness
And the Ka‘ba of the Holy House will be transported/
To the Ìaram [of Kufa] of he who has so much honor [i.e. ‘Ali]
Conclusion
107
Diwan al-KhaÒibi, Ms. Manchester (John Rylands Library), Ms. Arab, fol. 48b-49a.
In this context, it should be stressed that Sindawi, although he does not mention al-KhaÒibi,
dedicates an important chapter in his research of the fa∂a’il al-Ghari to the poetic Shi‘i
genre of “merits of the Ghari”; see SINDAWI, Between the Two Gharis of Kufa, p. 142-
150.
Jerusalem Kufa
Tradition of the isra’ to al-AqÒa Tradition of the isra’ to the Great
Mosque
The mi‘raj from the Dome of the Rock The mi‘raj from the Sahla mosque108
fa∂a’il Bayt al-Maqdis literature fa∂a’il al-Kufa literature
Mecca Kufa
The Black Stone The green stone in Sahla mosque
Founded by Abraham Founded by Abraham
Holy water of Zamzam Holy water of Euphrates
Site of pilgrimage once in a lifetime Site of the Ìashr in the time of the
mahdi
The holy mosque of the Ka‘ba The Great Mosque of Kufa and
al-Sahla mosque
Ìaram of God Ìaram of God and of ‘Ali
In the Muslim empire, the transfer of the capital out of Arabia, far from
the Ìaram of Mecca, demanded the existence of an equivalent or at least
a secondary sanctuary which would legitimize such a drastic step. The
capital Medina was legitimized by the location of the tomb of the Prophet
MuÌammad in that city and the proximity of Mecca. Damascus, the cap-
ital of the Umayyads, was legitimized by its proximity to Jerusalem, city
108
For the exact location of the mi‘raj at the Sahla mosque, see AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar
al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 437.
of the first qibla and of the isra’ and the mi‘raj109. Kufa was legitimized
by ‘Ali who later created a new dar al-hijra with his tomb and a sanctu-
ary associated with the prayer of all prophets as well as the isra’ and the
mi‘raj.
It is probable that the holy status of Kufa became in time a Shi‘i
characteristic and less a general Iraqi Islamic phenomenon. Over time addi-
tional Shi‘i sanctuaries were created, shrines of Imams and other members
of the ahl al-bayt, in particular: Jannat al-Baqi‘ in Medina, the tomb of
Îusayn and the ‘Abbas mosque in Karbala’, the mosques of Zaynab and
Ruqayya in Damascus, al-Ri∂a’s shrine in Mashhad, al-KaÂimiyya in
Baghdad, al-‘Askari mosque in Samarra, and more. Hence, in later tradi-
tions, Kufa’s original central role was forgotten even by the Shi‘i com-
munity. This may explain why there are only a few books of fa∂a’il
al-Kufa today.
While Kufa lost its centrality and suffered devastation, Jerusalem’s
fa∂a’il Bayt al-Maqdis were preserved due to their repeated relevance in
history. These traditions served as important propaganda during the con-
quest of Jerusalem by Crusaders and in modern history as an important
instrument to promote the Palestinian national movement. While Jerusa-
lem and its mosques were renovated several times, Kufa was neglected
for centuries110. Archeological excavations in the town, which took
place in the 1960s, are only a first and insufficient step toward revealing
Kufa’s secrets111.
When verifying the Sunni sources, we have to assume that the author-
ities’ interest was to make disappear any remnant of the glorification of
Kufa, the capital of the Shi‘i opposition, after the rebellion of Ibn Zubayr.
Nevertheless, the Sunni censorship was not total. Traces of the “merits
of Kufa” in Sunni sources are few but still exist, mainly in geographic
109
ELAD, Medieval Jerusalem, p. 147-163.
110
See Niebuhr’s description of Kufa at the beginning of the 20th century, in EI1,
vol. 2, p. 216.
111
See for example MUSTAFA, Preliminary Report, p. 36-65. These excavations, how-
ever, did not take place in the mosque but mainly in the Dar al-‘Imara. A description of
the actual situation of the Great Mosque is found in a publication of the Iraqi Government
Bureau of Antiquities: Masjid al-Kufa. According to this document, the actual mosque is
situated in the same place as the medieval mosque, southeast of actual Kufa and it includes
the mashhad of ‘Ali and a place believed to be the site where the water of the deluge
finally drained. According to this report, five and a half meters of the walls of the mosque
are sunken in the ground, due to negligence and its antiquity; see ibidem, 1-10 and the
map on p. 31. The most recent description of the Sahla mosque is in the commentaries of
IBN JA‘FAR AL-MASHHADI, Fa∂l al-Kufa, p. 39, note 1. According to this description, there
is a graveyard in the mosque and a maqam al-mahdi also called maqam ÒaÌib al-zaman
near the wall of the qibla.
112
IBN JUBAYR, Risalat i‘tibar al-nasik, p. 168-169.
113
IBN BA™™U™A, TuÌfat al-nuÂÂar, vol. 3, p. 54-55.
114
YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 4, p. 557.
Bibliographical abbreviations
AL-ADHANI, Kitab al-bakura al-Sulaymaniyya = SULAYMAN AL-ADHANI, Kitab
al-bakura al-Sulaymaniyya fi kashf asrar al-diyana al-NuÒayriyya, Beirut,
1862.
AKBAR, The Secular Roots = F. AKBAR, The Secular Roots of Religious Dissidence
in Early Islam. The Case of the Qaramita of Sawad Al-Kufa, in Journal of
the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, 12 (1991), p. 376-390.
AMIR-MOEZZI, La religion discrète = M.A. AMIR-MOEZZI, La religion discrète:
croyances et pratiques spirituelles dans l’islam shi’ite, Paris, 2006.
AMIR-MOEZZI (ed.), Le voyage initiatique = M.A. AMIR-MOEZZI (ed.), Le voyage
initiatique en terre d’islam. Ascensions célestes et itinéraires spirituels
(Bibliothèque de l’École des Hautes Études. Section des Sciences Reli-
gieuses, 103), Louvain, 1996.
AL-‘AYNI, ‘Umdat al-qari’ = BADR AL-DIN AL-‘AYNI, ‘Umdat al-qari’ sharÌ ÒaÌiÌ
al-Bukhari, Beirut, 1929.
BAÎR AL-‘ULUM AL-™ABA™ABA’I, al-Fawa’id al-rijaliyya = MUÎAMMAD AL-MAHDI
BAÎR AL-‘ULUM AL-™ABA™ABA’I, al-Fawa’id al-rijaliyya, Tehran, 1943.
AL-BAKRI, Mu‘jam ma ista‘jam = ‘ABDALLAH IBN ‘ABD AL-‘AZIZ AL-BAKRI,
Mu‘jam ma ista‘jam, Cairo, vol. 3, 1949.
BUEHLER, Sufi Heirs = A.F. BUEHLER, Sufi Heirs of the Prophet: The Indian
Naqshbandiyya and the Rise of the Mediating Sufi Shaykh, Columbia, 1998.
AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa = ÎUSAIN IBN-AÎMAD AL-BURAQI, Tarikh al-Kufa,
Najaf, 1960.
DAFTARY, Isma‘ilis = F. DAFTARY, art. Isma‘ilis, in Encyclopaedia Iranica,
vol. 4, London, 1990, p. 823-832.
DAFTARY, The Assassin Legends = F. DAFTARY, The Assassin Legends: Myths of
the Isma‘ilis, London, 1994.
DAFTARY, The Isma‘ilis = F. DAFTARY, The Isma‘ilis. Their History and Doctrine,
Cambridge, 1992.
DJAIT, al-Kufa = H. DJAIT, al-Kufa, naissance de la ville islamique, Paris, 1986.
EI1 = M.Th. HOUTSMA et al. (ed.), The Encyclopædia of Islam, 1st edition, 4 vol.
and Suppl., Leiden – London, 1913-1938.
EI2 = C.E. BOSWORTH et al. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition,
12 vol., Leiden, 1960-2005.
ELAD, Medieval Jerusalem = A. ELAD, Medieval Jerusalem and Islamic Wor-
ship, Leiden, 1995.
FRIEDMAN, Al-Îusayn ibn Îamdan al-KhaÒibi = Y. FRIEDMAN, Al-Îusayn ibn
Îamdan al-KhaÒibi. A historical biography of the founder of the NuÒayri-
‘Alawite sect, in Studia Islamica, 93 (2001), p. 91-112.
FRIEDMAN, The Nusayri-‘Alawis = Y. FRIEDMAN, The Nusayri-‘Alawis. An Intro-
duction to the Religion, History and Identity of the Leading Minority in
Syria, Leiden, 2010.
GIL, The Creed of Abu ‘Amir = M. GIL, The Creed of Abu ‘Amir, in Israel Orien-
tal Studies, 12 (1992), p. 9-47.
GOITEIN, Historical Background = S.D. GOITEIN, The Historical Background of
the Erection of the Dome of the Rock, in JAOS, 70 (1950), p. 104-108.
GOLDZIHER, Muslim Studies = I. GOLDZIHER, Muslim Studies, ed. S.M. STERN,
trans. C.R. BARBER and S.M. STERN, London, 1971.
KISTER, Sanctity Joint and Divided = M.J. KISTER, Sanctity Joint and Divided:
On Holy Places in the Islamic Tradition, in Jerusalem Studies in Arabic
and Islam, 20 (1996), p. 18-65.
KOHLBERG, A Medieval Muslim Scholar = E. KOHLBERG, A Medieval Muslim
Scholar at Work: Ibn Tawus and His Library, Leiden, 1992.
AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi = MUÎAMMAD IBN YA‘QUB AL-KULAYNI, al-Kafi, Tehran, 1968.
LIVNE-KAFRI, Burial in the Holy Land = O. LIVNE-KAFRI, Burial in the Holy
Land and Jerusalem According to Muslim Tradition, in Liber Annuus, 53
(2003), p. 417-425.
LIVNE-KAFRI, The Early Shi‘a = O. LIVNE-KAFRI, The Early Shi‘a and Jerusalem,
in Arabica, 48 (2001), p. 112-120.
MADELUNG, Ëarma†i = W. MADELUNG, art. Ëarma†i, in EI2, vol. 4, p. 660-665.
MADELUNG, The Fatimids = W. MADELUNG, The Fatimids and the Qarma†is of
BaÌrayn, in F. DAFTARY (ed.), Medieval Isma‘ili History and Thought,
Cambridge, 1996, p. 21-73.
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, Beirut, 1983, vol. 3, 13, 23, 40-42, 45, 55, 79, 94,
96, 97.
AL-MAQRIZI, Itti‘a al-Ìunafa’ = AÎMAD IBN ‘ALI AL-MAQRIZI, Itti‘a al-Ìunafa’
bi-akhbar al-a’imma al-Fa†imiyyin al-khulafa’, Cairo, 1948.
Masjid al-Kufa = [Iraqi Government Bureau of Antiquities], Masjid al-Kufa,
Baghdad, 1940.
MIRZA ÎUSAYN NURI, Mustadrak al-wasa’il = MIRZA ÎUSAYN NURI, Mustadrak
al-wasa’il, Qumm, 1987.
MORONEY, Iraq = M.G. MORONEY, Iraq After the Muslim Conquest, Princeton
(NJ), 1984.
AL-MUFID, Kitab al-irshad = SHAYKH AL-MUFID, Kitab al-irshad, Qumm, vol. 2,
1992.
MUSTAFA, Preliminary Report = M.A. MUSTAFA, Preliminary Report on the
Excavations in Kufa During the Third Season, in Sumer, 19 (1963), p. 36-65.
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal = AÎMAD IBN ‘ALI AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, Qumm, 1996.
AL-QAZWINI, Athar al-bilad = ZAKARIYYA IBN MUÎAMMAD AL-QAZWINI, Athar
al-bilad wa-akhbar al-‘ibad, Beirut, 1960.
RAVAN FARHADI, ‘Abdullah AnÒari of Herat = A.G. RAVAN FARHADI, ‘Abdullah
AnÒari of Herat (1006-1089): An Early ∑ufi Master, Richmond (Surrey), 1996.
AL-∑ALIÎI AL-SHAMI, Subul al-huda = MUÎAMMAD IBN YUSUF AL-∑ALIÎI AL-
SHAMI, Subul al-huda wa-al-rashad fi sirat khayr al-‘ibad, Beirut, 1993.
SHAHID, Hira = I. SHAHID, art. Hira, in EI2, vol. 3 (1971), p. 462-463.
SINDAWI, Between the Two Gharis of Kufa = Kh. SINDAWI, Between the Two
Gharis of Kufa and the Grave of ‘Ali ibn Abi ™alib in the Shi‘i Literature,
in al-Karmil, 23/24 (2002-2003), p. 138-139 [Arabic].
SIVAN, The Fa∂a’il al-Quds = E. SIVAN, The Beginnings of the Fa∂a’il al-Quds
Literature, in Israel Oriental Studies, 1 (1970), p. 263-271.
SUHAYL ZAKKAR, al-Jami‘ = SUHAYL ZAKKAR, al-Jami‘ fi akhbar al-Qarami†a,
Damascus, 1982.
AL-SUHAYLI, al-Raw∂ al-unuf = ‘ABD AL-RAÎMAN IBN MUÎAMMAD AL-SUHAYLI,
al-Raw∂ al-unuf, Cairo, 1971.
AL-SUYU™I, al-Îawi li-al-fatawa, vol. 2, Beirut, n.d.
AL-SUYU™I, Tarikh al-khulafa’ = ‘ABD AL-RAÎMAN IBN ABI BAKR AL-SUYU™I,
Tarikh al-khulafa’, Cairo, 1952.
Abstract — The article deals with the religious importance of Kufa, one of the
first garrison towns created by the Muslim conquerors of Iraq in the 7th century.
It suggests that the site of Kufa had a religious background combining Nestorian
Christianity and Arab paganism. Medieval Muslim traditions attributed to Kufa
are analyzed. Most of them are ascribed to the Great Mosque and the smaller
Sahla mosque. Shi‘i texts clearly indicate that the holiness of Kufa was equal to
that of Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem in primitive Shi’ism and even surpassed
their importance for two short periods. The article examines for the first time in
research the genre of fa∂a’il al-Kufa (the merits of Kufa) literature, written in
order to glorify this holy site, probably during the same period as the fa∂a’il Bayt
al-Maqdis (merits of Jerusalem) literature. The fa∂a’il al-Kufa were censored by
the Sunni authorities but fragments are still to be found in Sunni sources, mainly
in medieval geography books. Most of the genre survived in Shi‘i sources. The
analysis of the holiness of Kufa provides a solution to the unsolved question of
why in the 10th century the Qarma†ians stole the Black Stone from Mecca, and
why they returned it to Kufa before returning it to Mecca.
APPENDIX
115
YAQUT, Mu‘jam al-buldan, vol. 18, p. 184; AL-™USI, Fihrist, p. 92; AL-NAJASHI,
Rijal, p. 257-258, appears also as ‘Ali ibn Îasan ibn Fa∂∂al.
116
AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16, p. 272. According to AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 341,
he was nicknamed “Îamdan” and his nisba was al-Nahdi rather than al-Hudhali.
117
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 394; AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 18, p. 184.
118
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 398; AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16, p. 272. The author
claims that it is an epistle which is still available.
119
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 94; AL-™USI, Fihrist, p. 28-29. The author was a mawla, a
learned Zaydi scholar.
120
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 385; AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16, p. 273.
121
AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16, p. 273. According to the author, two copies of this
epistle are available in Iran.
122
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 17; AL-™USI, Fihrist, p. 5; AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16,
p. 272. Sunnis: Ibn ÎAJAR, Lisan al-mizan, vol. 1, p. 102. The author’s ancestors were
relatives of Mukhtar, the famous rebel from Kufa. He was a Zaydi who became an Imami
Shi‘i and went to Isfahan because of his extremist views.
123
AL-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 123.
124
AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 16, p. 272.
125
AL-™AHRANI, al-Dhari‘a, vol. 18, p. 184. Appears as AÌmad ibn ‘Ali ibn AÌmad
ibn ‘Abbas, in al-NAJASHI, Rijal, p. 101.
126
AL-MAJLISI, BiÌar al-anwar, vol. 97, p. 213; AL-ÎURR AL-‘AMILI, Wasa’il al-Shi‘a,
vol. 3, p. 161; appears as Fa∂l Kufa wa-Fa∂l ahliha in AGHA BUZURG AL-™AHRANI, al-
Dhari‘a ila taÒanif al-Shi‘a, Tehran, 1968, vol. 16, p. 272. According to Kohlberg the
author’s nisba is al-Bu†Ìa’i and he lived in the first half of the 5th/11th century; the first
part of the book is available in manuscript; see KOHLBERG, A Medieval Muslim Scholar,
p. 220. The book was printed in Beirut, Mu’assasat Ahl al-Bayt, 1988.
127
IBN JA‘FAR AL-MASHHADI, Fa∂l al-Kufa.