Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nusayrî Review
Nusayrî Review
net/publication/283753024
CITATION READS
1 557
2 authors, including:
Jens Kreinath
Wichita State University
40 PUBLICATIONS 89 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jens Kreinath on 23 November 2017.
Finally, I should note that Jamaica does not recognize the Rastafari as a “legiti-
mate” religion. Nevertheless, Jamaica benefits from the tourism generated by interest
in the Rastafari, though few Rastafari benefit from the bounty. If Jamaica does not
sanction Rastafari religiosity, why would Ethiopia?
In closing, I recommend Visions of Zion. It sets a baseline for grasping what repatri-
ation to Ethiopia means for Ethiopians and for the Rastafari. It will prepare us to probe
further into this emergent area of inquiry.
CHARLES PRICE
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(
The Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s: An Introduction to the Religion, History and Identity of the Lead-
ing Minority in Syria. By YARON FRIEDMAN. Islamic History and Civilization, vol.
77. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Pp. xxiiþ325. $182.00.
xix). Acknowledging that formerly only fragments were available, Friedman gives the
first coherent synthesis of the sect’s founders by reviewing their main scriptures. His
history
( of the Nuṣayrı̄s starts with a detailed description of the life and work of Abu
Shu ayb Muḥammad ibn Nuṣayr, his excommunication, and his creation of a mystical
community in Basra, Iraq, supplemented by the traditions and scriptures that suc-
ceeded him.
Friedman then introduces al-Ḥusayn ibn Ḥamdan al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ as the main founder of
the sect, who developed the most important theological doctrines for the Nuṣayrı̄s. He
discusses the leadership of al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ in the context of his notion of mystical guidance
before he accounts for the appointment of al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ as Imam and his founding of reli-
gious centers in Syria and Iraq. Subsequently, Friedman covers developments leading
to the formation of the Nuṣayrı̄ doctrines of secrecy, ascribed to al-Jisrı̄ and al-Jillı̄,
who were successors of al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ in Baghdad. Friedman then addresses the work of
Maymun al-Ṭabaranı̄( and his book of holidays, which outlines the main festivals as
observed by Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s. After discussing al-Ṭabaranı̄ and his leadership in times
of persecution, Friedman examines the two emerging rival groups, the Isḥaqı̄s and
Druzes. Addressing troubles experienced in Baghdad and Harran at the end of the
twelfth century, Friedman describes how the Nuṣayrı̄s were divided during the time of
the Crusades with a Christian dominance in the west and Muslim rule in the east.
Then, Friedman reconstructs the more widely known theological work of al-Makz un
al-Sinjarı̄, who primarily shaped the current outlook of the Nuṣayrı̄ religion. Because of
his religious doctrine and poetry, the work of al-Makz un is evaluated as having initiated
a short revival of the Nuṣayrı̄ religion in the thirteenth century. Friedman( concludes his
historical account with a description of the oppression of the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s by the
Maml
( uks and the Fatwa of Ibn Taymiyya. The overview of the history of the Nuṣayrı̄-
Alawı̄s is supplemented with a chronological table of historical events.
The second chapter, “The Nuṣayrı̄ Religion” (67–173), is dedicated to the discus-
sion
( of religious doctrines. Considering such doctrines, Friedman views the Nuṣayrı̄-
Alawı̄ religious system as an advanced stage of syncretism. Starting with a brief over-
view of Western research on the Nuṣayrı̄ religion, he explores in nine sections the
Nuṣayrı̄ religion in terms of its theology, cosmology, and anthropology. He discusses
the nature( of the divinity in its triad hierarchy, as represented through the abstract
terms “ma ( na” (meaning), “ism” (name), and “b ab” (gate) that are at the center of the
Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄ doctrine, before elaborating on the five emanations and the various
personifications of the divinity revealed through the prophets of Islam. Friedman fur-
ther describes the emanating structure of the Nuṣayrı̄ cosmos and the creation of the
world through letters and the Nuṣayrı̄ traditions in the interpretation of the original sin
before he discusses the doctrine of God’s revelation in three appearances.
In considering the Nuṣayrı̄ anthropology, he includes the transmigration of souls and
their various levels of reincarnation as central religious doctrine, stressing a rather
cyclical view of time and history. Subsequently, Friedman addresses the demonology
and personification of the devil as he reconstructs the hierarchy of the evil and demonic
nicknames, and then he dedicates a whole chapter to( the story about the “Prince of the
Bees,” which is a unique Nuṣayrı̄ tradition of Qur anic interpretation related to the
Nuṣayrı̄ notions of Docetism, martyrdom, and religious secrecy. The remaining
( part of
this chapter is dedicated to the allegorical interpretation of the shari a (Islamic law),
also practiced among the Nuṣayrı̄s. Friedman covers the Nuṣayrı̄ interpretation of the
five pillars of Islam, namely, the declaration of faith, the ritual prayer, the fast during
Ramadan, almsgiving, and the pilgrimage to Mecca, before he addresses the duty of
taqiyya (concealment), the spiritual jihad (struggle), and the importance of the esoteric
commandments and prohibitions for the Nuṣayrı̄s.
In the final section of the second chapter, Friedman gives a detailed account of the
Nuṣayrı̄ calendar and its holidays. After reviewing the celebration of Christian and
Islamic festivals, which is common to the Nuṣayrı̄s, including those (on or around
Christmas and Easter ( as well as the fast (ṣwam) of Ramaḍan with the Īd al-Fitr and
the ḥajj with the Īd al-Adha, Friedman accounts for the celebration of the Persian
Nawruz, the spring equinox, and the Mihrajan, the autumn equinox.( He completes his
accounts with the main Nuṣayrı̄ festivals,( which include the Īd al-Ghadı̄r celebrating
ur on the tenth of Muḥarram com-
the declaration of Ali’s divinity and the Īd al-Ash
memorating the massacre of the followers of Ali in Kerbela. (
The third chapter, “Identity( between Sunna and Shı̄ a” (175–222), deals with the
unique relation
( of the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s to other interpretations
( of Islam, namely, Sunni
and Shı̄ a. In discussing their attitudes toward the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s, Friedman accounts (
for different historical and geographical contexts. He first presents
( two different Shı̄ a
positions, namely
( an exclusive one, which views Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s as members of the
Extreme (Shı̄ a, or the Ghulat, and an inclusive one, which is more ( tolerant of the
Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s. Then, he explores the Sunni stance on the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s and goes
into some detail about the Fatwa of Ibn Taymiyya against them. After revealing their
historical misconceptions( and systemic inconsistencies, Friedman concludes by recon-
structing the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄ identity through the Dı̄w (an al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ , one of the most
important manuscripts, which identifies the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s in the context of their
own views of different Islamic groups.
( Here, Friedman recognizes the initiation pro-
cesses as central to the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄ identity and closes with a brief statement on
the Nuṣayrı̄ brotherhood as part of their religious identity.
In his conclusion (223–38), Friedman ( revisits the question of external influences and
explains the strength of the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s to resist persecutions in the current era. In
addressing the external influences, he accounts for influences of Greek philosophy and
Judaism regarding the formation of their religious beliefs. Here he revisits the question
of Christian influences, which he perceives as nominal and being overestimated in past
research due to a Christian bias of researchers and missionaries cultivated since the
nineteenth century. Friedman once more stresses the Zoroastrian influences ( on the for-
mation of Nuṣayrı̄ doctrines. Overall, he emphasizes the changes the Alawı̄s have
undergone, starting with their strategic orientation toward the Muslim world and the
ways in which they currently relate to political and religious issues in the Middle East.
Eight significant appendices supplement the main text. In these appendices, Fried-
man provides( sources and documents that are of high relevance for further research on
the Nuṣayrı̄- Alawı̄s. Most important, appendix 1, “Primary Nuṣayrı̄ Sources” (241–
76), lists as many as sixty documents, which were used throughout the text, and com-
ments on their authorship and themes. Appendix 2 lists the titles of all missing sources
and mentions the places in which they are cited. Friedman also lists the ciphers, a table
of ranks, and the names of the Nuṣayrı̄ imams and their prophets. Appendix 6 gives a
summary of the Dı̄w an al-Khaṣı̄bı̄ , which contains the major poems of the Nuṣayrı̄s,
JENS KREINATH
Wichita State University
Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence: Religious Violence across Culture and History. By
JACK DAVID ELLER. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2010. Pp. 451. $28.00.
In Cruel Creeds, Virtuous Violence, Jack David Eller analyzes an array of phenom-
ena that typically fall under the label of religion and violence. The book’s overall
arrangement is right on point, with introductory chapters on understanding violence
and understanding religion, followed by a chapter each on sacrifice, self-injury, perse-
cution, ethnoreligious conflict, war, homicide and abuse, and finally religion and non-
violence. At the beginning, theory is primary, supported by illustrations from the his-
tory of religions. In later chapters—the one on ethnoreligious conflict, for instance—
summaries of conflicts dominate and theory is secondary. Presumably Eller’s book is
written for undergraduate readers, who will find the historical summaries riveting.
Overall, the book succeeds in introducing readers to a range of issues associated with
the topic. In the hands of a professor with critical command of the subject and supple-
mented by outside readings, Eller’s book would be stimulating for first-time students
of religion and violence.
Of course, all projects of such an enormous scope suffer from shortcomings. Con-
spicuous by its absence is the kind of literary-historical analysis one would expect of
an expert in any particular tradition of religion and violence. That is, there is insuffi-
cient attention to the way that religious imagination and violence intertwine com-
plexly in historical circumstance, as in biblical accounts of herem (255),1 or in
1
For the sacrificial innuendos, see Susan Niditch, War in the Hebrew Bible (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1993).