Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case 40 - 46
Case 40 - 46
Bail should be granted before arraignment, otherwise the accused may be precluded from filing a motion
to quash. For if the information is quashed and the case is dismissed, there would be no need of
arraignment. Relative to the case, to the condition the grant of bail on his arraignment would be to place
him in a position where he has to choose between:
a. filing a motion to quash and, thus, delay his release until his motion can be resolved because
prior to its resolution, he cannot be arraigned
b. foregoing the filing of a motion to quash so that he can be arraigned and thereafter be released
on bail
These scenarios violate the accused’s constitutional right to bail.
One of the conditions of bail is that the accused shall appear before the court whenever so required by
the court. The failure of the accused to appear at the trial without justification despite due notice shall be
deemed an express waiver of his right to be present on the date specified in the notice. There can be no
trial in absentia unless the accused has been arraigned.
The Constitution allows the accused to be absent at the trial but not at certain stages of the proceedings,
to wit:
a. at arraignment and plea
b. during trial whenever necessary
c. at the promulgation of sentence
R.A No. 7160 is similar to rape in which each act should be the subject of a separate information.