Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Accounting Spiceland 3rd Edition Solutions Manual
Financial Accounting Spiceland 3rd Edition Solutions Manual
The financial accounting course is taken by all business majors, usually in their sophomore year.
Financial accounting reports summarize the financial health, operating results, and changes in
financial status for a business as viewed over a specific period of time. This information is used
by outside parties such as stockholders, creditors, prospective investors, regulatory agencies, and
the general public. The financial accounting market can be segmented into three categories:
preparer (traditional), balanced, and user (innovative). Spiceland/Thomas/Herrmann falls into the
balanced segment by offering a balance between the user and preparer orientation. The decision
maker's perspective used throughout the book competes directly with Kimmel's pedagogical
approach.
Financial Accounting has been revised based on the great success of Financial Accounting 2e,
Spiceland, Thomas, Herrmann. The content was developed with feedback from over 480 reviewers
and focus group participants from across the country. The authors, David Spiceland, Wayne
Thomas and Don Herrmann, have developed a unique text based on over 50 collective years of
experience in the classroom. They've brought together best practices like highlighting Common
Mistakes, offering frequent Let's Review exercises, integrating the course with a running
Continuing Problem, demonstrating the relevance of the course to non-majors with a Career
Corner, and communicating it all in a student-friendly Conversational Writing Style.
Don Herrmann passed away on May 8, 2018, after a 14-month battle with brain cancer. He was
the Deloitte Professor of Accounting at Oklahoma State University, where he had been on the
faculty since 2005. Don won several teaching awards and enjoyed teaching financial accounting,
intermediate accounting, and doctoral students. He received his bachelor’s degree in business from
John Brown University, his master’s degree in accounting from Kansas State University, and his
PhD in accounting from Oklahoma State University. He was active in the AAA and served as
president of the International Accounting Section.
Don was best known for his warm and welcoming personality. He enjoyed serving in his local
community and church, as well as hosting families and students in his home. His outgoing nature
wasn’t the type that filled a room with his presence, but it was the type that filled a one-on-one
conversation with purpose.
Above all else, family was first to Don. Some of his favorite family activities included camping,
going to amusement parks, and coaching little league sports. He is survived by his wonderful wife
Mary and four amazing children Rachel, David, Nathan, and Micah. As he battled through the
different stages of cancer, he often reflected on his family. He was so proud of them and talked
about them with a humble thankfulness.
Those who knew Don were fortunate to share their lives with him. He lived with a sense of purpose
and a solid foundation. That foundation continues through his family and the people he’s touched.
He will be missed by many.
Wayne Thomas is the W. K. Newton Chair in Accounting at the University of Oklahoma, where
he teaches introductory financial accounting and intermediate accounting. He received his
bachelor’s degree in accounting from Southwestern Oklahoma State University, and his master’s
and PhD in accounting from Oklahoma State University. Professor Thomas has won teaching
awards at the university, college, and departmental levels, and has received the Outstanding
Educator Award from the Oklahoma Society of CPAs. Wayne is also a co-author on McGraw-
Hill’s best-selling Financial Accounting, with David Spiceland and Don Herrmann.
His primary research interests are in markets-based accounting research, financial disclosures,
financial statement analysis, and international accounting issues. He previously served as an editor
of The Accounting Review and has published articles in a variety of journals including The
Accounting Review, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research,
Review of Accounting Studies, and Contemporary Accounting Research. He has won several
research awards, including the American Accounting Association’s Competitive Manuscript
Award. Professor Thomas enjoys various activities such as tennis, basketball, golf, and crossword
puzzles, and most of all, he enjoys spending time with his wife and kids.
David Spiceland is Accounting Professor Emeritus at the University of Memphis. He received his
Another random document
un-related content on Scribd:
they delayed the approach of the Federal forces. The Federal commander
had some disquieting fears about the number of men that were engaged in
the expedition, and he did not press the pursuit as savagely as he would
have done had he known that less than seven hundred men were standing in
the pathway he must travel to reach his adventurous foes, who were now
divided by the rapid currents of the icy stream.
A part of the Confederate dead who so gloriously had died were left
behind. Their enemies gave them burial. War destroys the tenderness of
sentiment. The safety of their own lives was more important than the
sepulture of the slain, however bravely they had gone down in the struggle.
Most of the wounded were placed in wagons and ambulances, which were
driven away from the scene of carnage and battle. The infantry, in defense
of their wounded comrades, had the call been made, would have been
extremely dangerous customers. The economics of war are ruthless. The
living, the fighters, are to be considered, and then the maimed and dead. On
the horsemen fell the burden of the defense of the rear. During all the
expedition, the web-footed infantry had gotten the worst of the deal, and the
cavalry, gay, happy and mounted, were disposed to place no unnecessary
work upon their comrades who were trudging their way back to their
comrades, who were longing to hear the tidings of what battle had brought
to those who had been selected for so dangerous a mission.
If the infantry had looked with side glances at the cavalry when at Baird’s
Mills, they had now lost the recollection of such ungenerous feelings in
admiration for the horsemen who, dismounted, had manifested a courage
and valor equal to their own, and who, in the charge and advance upon the
enemy at Hartsville, and in standing off the Federal pursuers, had displayed
an intrepidity that was not unworthy of any Kentucky Confederates, be they
men who walked or men who rode to battle. Whenever Hartsville was
recalled or its experiences were freshened in their minds, there was no
distrust of the steadfastness of the 3rd, 8th and 11th Kentucky Cavalry, and
the gallant 9th Tennessee, and by common consent the 2nd and 9th
Kentucky Infantry admitted these regiments which had been with them at
Hartsville into the full brotherhood of war’s heroes.
The captured guns and the four pieces brought by Morgan were pounding
away on the south bank of the river and hurling shot and shell at the
pursuers on the north bank, serving notice on the Federals that thus far and
no farther could they come. It never entered the minds of the Federals that
the Confederates were so few in number. They could not understand how
any commander with the slightest prudence would expose his men to such
risk as Morgan had dared. It would have been questionable for even cavalry
to have undertaken such a campaign, but to jeopardize two of the best
regiments of infantry in the army of Tennessee by marching and fighting so
far from their military base, and with such liability to attack on the rear and
flank, was inconceivable to the Federals who were pursuing. They
concluded that there were at least three times as many in the battle as had
captured their comrades at Hartsville. Colonels Harlan and Moore estimated
Morgan’s fighting force at five thousand, and Federal officers declared that
they had seen several regiments of infantry and cavalry standing across the
river awaiting the return of their comrades who had gone over the stream
and won victory at Hartsville.
By eleven o’clock the agony was past. The pursuit was ended. Joy and
complacency filled the hearts of the infantry as they tramped back to
Baird’s Mills. They did not ask to ride any more. The cavalry marched in
the rear and stood guard and waited for approaching foes. None came. After
crossing the stream, courtesy and generosity prompted kindness to the blue-
coated prisoners. There was no word of unkindness spoken.
Along the Confederate lines, they were received with surprise, and
wonder staggered credence to believe how few could have accomplished so
much or that any men in such rigorous weather could have so quickly
covered so great a distance, or against such odds have won so marvelous a
victory.
For a little while the Federal commanders were dazed. On December 7th
General Rosecrans wired General George H. Thomas as follows: “Do I
understand they have captured an entire brigade of our troops without our
knowing it, or a good fight?” And at one thirty o’clock the same day there
came from the President at Washington the following message: “The
President to Major General George H. Thomas: The President demands an
explanation of the Hartsville affair. Report in detail exact position, strength
and relative distances of your troops between Gallatin and Hartsville, and
causes of disaster as far as known to you.”
On December 10th, the rage and indignation became more pronounced,
and General Halleck wired from Washington: “The most important of the
President’s inquiries has not been answered. What officer or officers are
chargeable with the surprise at Hartsville and deserve punishment?” Later
General Halleck wired the President: “I respectfully recommend that
Colonel Moore, 104th Illinois Volunteers, be dismissed from the service for
neglect of duty in not properly preparing for the enemy’s attack on
Hartsville, Tennessee.” Afterwards Colonel Moore was allowed to resign on
the ground of disability after long imprisonment by the Confederates.
Meagre and exaggerated reports were spread among the Confederates of
the number of men that had reduced such a numerous company to prisoners.
The whole army with glad cheers along the line greeted the return of the
victors. Much was said of the cavalry, but the chiefest and highest meed of
praise was awarded to the infantry. In less than thirty-six hours they had
marched forty-five miles over trying and difficult roads, had fought a battle,
with their associates had captured eighteen hundred prisoners and brought
these back across an almost impassable stream in the midst of fierce winter
weather.
General Bragg, more or less phlegmatic, was moved to enthusiastic
praise. He tendered to General Morgan his thanks and assured him and his
troops of his unbounded admiration.
He said: “I take great pleasure in commending the endurance and
gallantry of all engaged in this remarkable expedition.” He predicted that
such valor and courage had before it higher and yet more magnificent
victories, and to appeal still more strongly to the pride of those who had
been engaged in this wonderful conflict, he ordered that hereafter, upon the
battle flags of all organizations which had taken part in this battle, the name
of “Hartsville” should be emblazoned, to remind the world forever of the
bravery, endurance, enterprise and courage of those who had there won
such great distinction.
C XI
WHEELER’S RAID INTO TENNESSEE,
AUGUST, 1864