Final Update

EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF
MULTISTORY BUILDING WITH COMPOSITE

FRAME IN SEISMIC ZONE-IV
A Thesis Submitted
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
in
Structural Engineering
by
DEEPANKAR SHARMA
(Roll no. 1834073502)
Under the Supervision of
Asst.Prof. Mr. SONU MANGLA
Vivekananda College of Technology & Management, Aligarh
to the
Faculty of Civil Engineering
DR. APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
June, 2020
EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF
MULTISTORY BUILDING WITH COMPOSITE
FRAME IN SEISMIC ZONE-IV
A Thesis Submitted
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
in
Structural Engineering
by
DEEPANKAR SHARMA
(Roll no. 1834073502)
Under the Supervision of
Asst.Prof. Mr. SONU MANGLA
Vivekananda College of Technology & Management, Aligarh
to the
Faculty of Civil Engineering
DR. APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
June, 2020
DECLARATION
I declare that this written submission represents my work and ideas in my own words. I
have adequately cited and referenced all the sources. I also declare that I have adhered to all
principles of academic honesty and integrity and have not misrepresented or fabricated or
falsified any idea/data/source/fact in my submission. I understand that any violation of the
above will be cause for disciplinary action by the University and can also evoke penal
action from the sources which have thus not been properly cited or from whom paper
permission has not been taken when needed.
Deepankar Sharma
Roll no. 1834073502
Department of civil Engineering
Date: _________________
CERTIFICATE
“EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF MULTISTORY BUILDING WITH
COMPOSITE FRAME IN SEISMIC ZONE-IV”
“To whomsoever it may concern”

This is to certify that Mr. Deepankar Sharma has carried out his research work presented in this
thesis entitled “EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF MULTISTORY BUILDING WITH
COMPOSITE FRAME IN SEISMIC ZONE-IV for the award of Master of technology in
‘Structural Engineering' from the department of Civil Engineering, Vivekananda College of
Technology and Management, Aligarh, under my supervision. The thesis embodies results of
original work and studies are carried out by the student himself and the contents of the thesis do
not form the basis for the award of any other degree to the candidate or to anybody else from this
or any other University.
Signature of Supervisor
Full Name: Mr. Sonu Mangla
Date- Designation: Assistant Professor
Address: Department of Civil Engineering
V.C.T.M. Aligarh
ABSTRACT
Nowadays the uses of the composite materials across various fields increasing in field of
the engineering such as civil, mechanical, aerospace engineering, the main purpose of the
composite materials is to reduce the specific weight or unit weight of the materials and
increase the stability of the structure, which can resist the high lateral or vertical load on the
structure. So in this project, we took composite material in the column and normal RCC
column. There are three models such as normal RCC column (model-01), Concrete Filled
Steel Tube column (Model-02) and I-section steel with reinforcement Column (Model-03).
These three models prepare and analyzed with the help of the Etabs software. In the model-
03, we provide the reinforcement with I-section steel because to create a proper join
between the beam and column.
Using the IS Code 1893-part-1:2016 for the seismic analysis of these three models by using
the history data and data used for the time history is “Andaman Islands 2009”. We taken
some seismic parameter such as base shear, storey drift, maximum storey displacement,
natural period, storey acceleration, and mode shape, on the basis of which we will compare
the result of these three models, and decide that which models is more stable as other two
model
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I owe a debt of gratitude to the Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow for
giving me the opportunity to work on the thesis during my final year of M.Tech. Thesis
work is an important aspect in the field of engineering.
I also owe my sincerest gratitude towards Asst. Prof. Mr. Sonu Mangla, Civil Engineering
Department, VCTM, Aligarh for his valuable guidance and healthy criticism throughout my
thesis which helped me immensely to complete my work successfully.
I would like to thank the Dean Academics and members of the Departmental Research
Committee for their valuable suggestions and supports during my presentation of the work..
I would also like to thank my parents, friends and everyone who has knowingly &
unknowingly helped me throughout my thesis.
Last but not least, a word of thanks for the authors of all those books and papers which I
have consulted during my thesis work as well as for preparing the report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER -1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
1.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1
1.3. CFST COLUMN .......................................................................................................... 1
1.4 TYPES OF CFST COLUMN ........................................................................................ 2
1.5. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FAILURE OF CONCRETE COLUMN AND CFST
COLUMN ............................................................................................................................ 3
1.6. COMPOSITE SECTION ............................................................................................. 4
CHAPTER-2 LITERATURE SURVEY ................................................................................ 5
2.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER-3 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 9
3.1. GENERAL ................................................................................................................... 9
3.2. SOFTWARE ................................................................................................................ 9
3.3. METHOD OF ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 9
3.3.1 Equivalent Static Analysis .................................................................................... 10
3.3.2 Response Spectrum Analysis ................................................................................ 11
3.3.3 Linear Dynamic Analysis ..................................................................................... 12
3.3.4 Non-Linear Static Analysis (Pushover Analysis) ................................................. 12
3.4. METHOD SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS ................................................................ 13
3.5. RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR ....................................................................... 13
3.6. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL ............................................................................ 13
3.6.1. Material Property ................................................................................................. 13
3.6.2. Load Parameter .................................................................................................... 14
3.6.3. Geometrical Property of Model ........................................................................... 14
3.6.4. Seismic Property .................................................................................................. 15
3.7. DETAILS VIEW OF THE MODEL .......................................................................... 16
3.7.1. Plan and 3D view of RCC building (Model-01).................................................. 16
3.7.2.Plan and 3D view of CFT Column building (Model-02) ..................................... 17
3.7.3.Plan and 3D view of building (Model-03) ............................................................ 19
CHAPTER -4 RESULT AND ANALYSIS.......................................................................... 22
4.1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 22
4.2. NATURAL PERIOD ................................................................................................. 22
4.3. BASE SHEAR ............................................................................................................ 24
4.4. MAXIMUM STOREY DISPLACEMENT ............................................................... 26
4.5.STOREY OVERTURNING MOMENT ..................................................................... 27
4.6. STOREY DRIFT ........................................................................................................ 29
4.7. STOREY STIFFNESS ............................................................................................... 30
4.8. STOREY ACCELERATION ..................................................................................... 32
4.8.1.Storey Acceleration of the Model-01 ................................................................... 32
4.8.2. Storey Acceleration of the Model-02 .................................................................. 33
4.8.3. Storey Acceleration of the Model-03 .................................................................. 35
4.9. MODE SHAPE........................................................................................................... 36
4.9.1. Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-01................................................................. 37
4.9.10. Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-20............................................................... 41
4.10. COLUMN FORCE ................................................................................................... 44
4.10.1. Column Force in Model-01 ............................................................................... 44
4.11. DESIGN REACTION .............................................................................................. 47
4.11.1.Design Reaction of Model-01 ............................................................................. 47
4.12. JOINT DRIFT .......................................................................................................... 50
4.12.1.Joint Drift of Model-01 ....................................................................................... 51
CHAPTER-5 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 59
REFERENCE ........................................................................................................................ 61
LIST OF TABLE
Table-3.1: Material Property ................................................................................................ 14
Table-3.2: Load Parameter ................................................................................................... 14
Table-3.3: Geometrical Parameter ....................................................................................... 15
Table-3.4: Seismic Parameter .............................................................................................. 15
Table-4.1: Natural Period ..................................................................................................... 23
Table-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX ........................................................................................ 25
Table-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement ......................................................................... 26
Table-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment ............................................................................... 28
Table-4.5: Storey Drift ......................................................................................................... 29
Table-4.6: Storey Stiffness ................................................................................................... 31
Table-4.7: Storey Acceleration Model-01............................................................................ 32
Table-4.10: Column Force of Model-01 .............................................................................. 45
Table-4.13: Design Reaction of Model-01........................................................................... 48
Table-4.16: Joint Drift of Model-01..................................................................................... 51

LIST OF FIGURE
Fig-1.1: CFST Column ........................................................................................................... 2
Fig-1.2: Type of CFST Column ............................................................................................. 3
Fig-1.3: Difference between CFST and normal RCC Column .............................................. 3
Fig-1.4: Composite Section .................................................................................................... 4
Fig-3.1: Method of Analysis ................................................................................................. 10
Fig-3.2: Plan of Model-01 .................................................................................................... 16
Fig-3.3: Elevation of Model-01 ............................................................................................ 16
Fig-3.4: 3D View of Model-01 ............................................................................................. 17
Fig-3.5: Cross-section CFT Column of Model-02 ............................................................... 17
Fig-3.6: Plan of Model-02 .................................................................................................... 18
Fig-3.7: Elevation of Model-02 ............................................................................................ 18
Fig-3.8: 3D View of Model-02 ............................................................................................. 19
Fig-3.9: Cross-section of Composite Column of Model-03 ................................................ 19
Fig-3.10: Plan of Model-03 .................................................................................................. 20
Fig-3.11: Elevation of Model-03 .......................................................................................... 20
Fig-3.12: 3-D View of Model-03 ......................................................................................... 21
Fig-4.1: Natural Period ......................................................................................................... 24
Fig-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX ............................................................................................ 25
Fig-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement ............................................................................. 27
Fig-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment ................................................................................... 28
Fig-4.5: Storey Drift ............................................................................................................. 30
Fig-4.6: Storey Stiffness ....................................................................................................... 31
Fig-4.7: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-01 .................................................................... 37

Fig-4.10: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-15 .................................................................. 38

EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING WITH COMPOSITE FRAME IN
SEISMIC ZONE-IV
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. GENERAL
The composite structure is mainly provided to reduce the effect of horizontal load which
acting on building. Normal RCC structure has low strength as compared to the composite
materials according to some research paper. By using the composite materials in the
column, the effect of the crack or buckling of the column reduce. The stability of the
resisting the forces is high in the composite material.
1.2. BACKGROUND
The construction of steel concrete building has become well known in recent years because
of their different points of interest in excess of predictable Reinforced Concrete and steel
building. In urban territories, because of amplified populace, inaccessibility of land,
engineers like to construct of multistorey tallest structures. CFST (Concrete Filled Steel
Tube) cylindrical individuals are complex individuals who use upsides of in cooperation
steel and concrete. It consist of empty steel cross section of circular, and square shape
loaded up with PCC or RCC. The concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) vertical member of
offers dissimilar structural advantages such as soaring compressive quality, fire resistance,
high ductility and effective vitality assimilation capacity. The CFST structural part has
various distinct focal points over comparable steel, reinforced concrete, or steel-reinforced
concrete part. Direction of the steel and concrete in the cross-section improves the quality
and firmness of section. The steel lies at the external edge where it performs most
effectively in strain and in opposing bowing second. Likewise, the firmness of the CFST is
significantly enhanced because the steel.
1.3. CFST COLUMN

It is a compression member, comprising moreover a concrete-encased steel section or a
concrete-filled tubular section of hot-rolled steel (figure 1.1) and is generally used as a
load-bearing structural member in a complex framed building. Load conveying limit of
complex columns is more than that of the exposed fortified column and the auxiliary steel
column remembered for framework. The concrete-filled steel rounded (figure 1.1) (CFST)
Department of Civil Engineering, VCTM, Aligarh 1

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
structure offers various auxiliary advantages, including high quality and fire protections,
positive malleability and huge vitality assimilation limits. There is additionally no
requirement for the utilization of covering during concrete development; subsequently, the
development cost and period are decreased. These favourable circumstances have been
broadly misused and have prompted broad utilization of concrete filled rounded structures
in structural designing building.
Fig-1.1: CFST Column
1.4 TYPES OF CFST COLUMN

It is classified into the five types, which is given below:
1) Circular Shape CFST Column

2) Square Shape CFST Column
3) Rectangular Shape CFST Column
4) Hexagonal Shape CFST Column
5) Spherical Shape CFST Column

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-1.2: Type of CFST Column
1.5. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FAILURE OF CONCRETE COLUMN AND CFST

COLUMN
The normally RCC column cannot be constructed for the more height such as more 5.0m
because that makes buckling in the column and that column easily gets collapse. So to
reduce the effect of the buckling in the long column, we use the composite material that
column can resist that load without collapse due to buckling. The fig-1.3 represents the
difference between the normal RCC column and CFST column.
Fig-1.3: Difference between CFST and normal RCC Column

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
1.6. COMPOSITE SECTION

Composite section is defined as the when a section is made up of the two materials for
single purpose is known as composite material.
Example using the concrete and steel in the RCC works for resisting the load. The figure of
the composite section is given below:
Figure-1.4: Composite Section

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
CHAPTER-2
LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1. GENERAL
In this chapter of literature reviews, we had provided conclusion of some research paper
related to the composite material as well as CFST column. The conclusion of that paper is
given below:
[1] Ghoneam (1995) introduced the dynamic qualities of overlaid composite shafts (LCB)
with different fiber directions and diverse limit obsessions and talked about in the
nonappearance furthermore, nearness of breaks. A numerical model was created, and trial
analysis was used to contemplate the impacts of various split profundities and areas, limit
conditions, what's more, different code quantities of covers on the dynamic attributes of
CLCB. The analysis demonstrated great understanding among exploratory and hypothetical
outcomes.
[2] Jeong et al. (1995) researched tentatively dynamic qualities of soaring quality evenly
covered carbon fiber epoxy merged vertical member of the building was in space chamber
outfitted with a fibre optic micrometer and the electromagnetic sledge. It was discovered
that macro mechanical hypothesis can precisely foresee the dynamic qualities of the carbon
fiber epoxy complex flimsy vertical member of building when unidirectional property of
complex material were identified.
[3] Gil Lee et al. (1998) explored to get better the damping limit of column of precision
reflect outside granulating appliance device, mixture vertical member of building were
fabricated in cohesive nature by holding flute fiber fortified epoxy complex plates to a cast-
iron vertical member of structure. To enhance damping limit of half breed vertical member
of building that is column, damping limit of mixture vertical member of column were
determined as for the fiber direction and thickness of complex cover plate and contrasted
with deliberate damping limit. From tests, it discovered that damping limit of crossbreed
vertical member of the building was 35% superior than that of cast iron vertical member
of structure.
[4] Jaehong Lee(2000) examined on liberated vibration study of an overlaid horizontal
member of building with delimitations introduced utilizing layer-wise hypothesis.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Conditions of movement are gotten from Hamilton's standard, and a limited component
strategy is created to figure the issue. Numerical outcomes are gotten tending with the
impacts of the cover edge, area, aspect, and a numeral of delaminating on vibration
frequencies of delaminated horizontal member of building. It is discovered that a layer-wise
approach is sufficient for shaking theory test of delaminated complex member.
[5] Lee and Kim (2002) built up common investigative model relevant to dynamic
conduct of flimsy walled I-area composition of materials. The model depends on old-style
cover hypothesis, and records for blend of flexural and twisting modes for self-assertive
overlay stacking grouping setup, for example, unsymmetrical just as symmetric, and
different limit situation. A relocation base 1-D limited component model is created to
anticipate the common frequencies and relating vibration modes for meager walled
composite bar. Conditions of movement gotten from Hamilton's standard. Geometric
outcomes gotten for dainty walled composites tending with the impacts of fiber edge,
modulus proportion, tallness to-thickness proportion, and limit situation on vibration and
method states of composite.
[6] Kisa (2003) explored impacts of breaks on dynamical attributes of cantilever
composite horizontal member of building, completed of graphite fibre-strengthened
polyamide. Limited component furthermore, part mode blend techniques was utilized to
model the issue. Cantilever complex beam isolated into a few parts from break segments.
Impacts of area and profundity of the splits, and volume division and direction of strands
on normal vibration and mode states of horizontal member of building with inverse of
lateral non-spreading open splits, was investigated. After effects of investigation lead to
ends that, introduced strategy was satisfactory for the vibration investigation of broke
cantilever composite beams, and by utilizing the drop in regular frequencies and the
adjustment in the mode shapes, the nearness and nature of splits in a building can be
identified.
[7] Li Jun, Hua Hongxing(2008) introduced specific dynamic stiffness matrix of identical
overlaid merged shaft dependent at trigonometric shear mishappening hypothesis.
Dynamic stiffness prevailing conditions figured straightforwardly at accurate intellect by
illuminating administering differential conditions of movement that portray mishappenings
of overlaid pillars as per trigonometric shear distortion hypothesis, which incorporates
SEISMIC ZONE-IV
sinusoidal variety of the pivotal uprooting over the cross-area. The inferred dynamic
stiffness matrix is then utilized at combination with the Wittrock–Williams calculation to
process characteristic frequencies and mode states of combined shafts.
[8] Volkan Kahya(2011) concentrated on multifaceted shear deformable horizontal
member of building component for active inspection of overlaid composite beams exposed
to moving burdens. Overlaid horizontal member of building component incorporates
disconnect revolving degree of opportunity for every lamina while it doesn't involve a few
extra hub and lateral degrees of opportunity past individuals essential for a only lamina.
Shape capacities chosen to guarantee similarity and progression between laminae.
Interracial slither, and control not permitted. Results specified for moving burden
instigated ambiance of overlaid merged horizontal member of building. Impacts of heap
rate, limit surroundings, and envelop lay-up on horizontal member of building reaction are
contemplated
[9] Zhu (2011) researched at Filets which regularly initiate in meagre walled pillars.
Overlooking nearness of filet in the finite element model of slender walled pillar could
altogether change natural time and mode states of building. Huge number of strong
components essential to precisely speak to nature and solidness of a filet in a FE model,
which make size of the FE model pointlessly huge for worldwide dynamic as well as static
examination. Natural period and mode states of a dainty walled L-shaped shaft example
determined to utilize the new system are contrasted and its trial results for 28 modes. The
most extreme blunder between determined and estimated natural period for all modes is
under two percentage and related modular affirmation rule esteems are for the most part
above ninty five percent.
[10] Konstantinos Daniel (2014), The legitimacy of the above contextual analyses been
confirmed by contrasting geometric expectations and investigational records acquired from
a wide scope of basic frameworks exposed to static and hysteretic loadings. Full subtleties
of these near investigations are introduced in the writing. Be that as it may, such
constitutive system and models normally subject to parameters which assessed through
specific utilization of experimental data, and in architects' prudence to pick and deciphers
these when data are utilized for explicit purposes. In this section, it has been endeavored to
sum up the constitutive models for various application. Then again, absence of sweeping
SEISMIC ZONE-IV
statement and objectivity that portrays most FE bundles must be adjusted using material
models which are good with legitimate experimental data. Truth be told, the work
introduced in the section considered as stage towards these bearings. Displaying of SCC
individuals in this part first serves principally calculation of the reaction of such
individuals when they are exposed to seismic activities and part second goes about as a
vehicle for doing the state assurance of area (or coordination highlight) an edge component
and eventually to the entire edge get together.
[11]Jinlong pan (2018), in this research paper, hub negative nature of force presentation of
RCC-encased CFST vertical member of building tentatively explored. Four RCC-encased
CFST columns or compressive member of the structure and two concrete-encased CFST
vertical member of building was tried. Concrete-encased CFST vertical member of
structures fizzled by means of genuine binding material spelling and pounding, while ECC-
encased CFST column by and large keeps up its respectability. The compressive strength
for C1-ECC is about thirty percen privileged than C1-C,even however the external ECC has
comparative negative nature of strength with the external concrete, showing that the ECC
encased CFST has a superior composite (two or more material prepare together ) impact
than that of concrete-encased CFST columns. Likewise, pliability record for example C1-
ECC is only 10 %.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
CHAPTER-3
METHODOLOGY
3.1. GENERAL
In the chapter of methodology, we will know details about the model and all parameter,
which is used to create and analyze the model; also we will discuss the load combination,
the figure of the model, etc.
3.2. SOFTWARE
 The Etabs software is developed by the CSI Company, which work with earthquake
engineering and structural engineering.
 It is designing encoding platform that take addicted to relation multi-Storey struture
analysis and design. Displaying tools and plan of building, standard code for
analysis burden remedies, analysis approach and planning procedures, all facilities
with matrix-like geometry one of kind to these class of building. Design of steel
and concrete boundaries (with robotized streamlining), merged bars, composite
subdivision, steel roof joist, and concrete and stonework shear partition integrated,
just like perimeter confirm for steel links and base laminate. Model may be virtually
provide, and all product can be indicate legitimately on building. Exhaustive and
adjustable reports are accessible for all analysis and design yield, and schematic
increase drawings of confining procedure, calendars, subtleties, and cross-segments
may be bent for concrete and steel building.
3.3. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Method of analysis is classified into two types such as “Linear and non-linear” analysis.
Details of the analysis are given below in the fig-3.1:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-3.1: Method of Analysis
3.3.1 Equivalent Static Analysis

Design lateral force on building shall be work out as a whole, and then disseminated next
to with height of structure depend on undemanding modus operandi proper for building
with a habitual allotment of weight and stiffness. According to IS 1893(part-I):2016
following were most important stepladder for seminal the forced by an correspondent static
method. The following step is given below for calculating the base shear in the model:
Step-01:Determination of Time Period (Clause 7.6.2 of IS 1893 Part I: 2016)
Ta =0.075h0.75 (for RC Moment Resisting Frame Struture)
&
Ta =0.080h0.75 (for RC-steel composite Moment Resisting Frame)
Where,
h is height of the building ( m)
Step-02: Design lateral seismic Coefficient
𝐙 𝐒𝐚
( )( )
𝟐 𝐠
Ah = 𝐑 (Clause 6.4.2 of IS 1893 Part I: 2016
( )
𝐈

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Where,
R = response reduction factor
Z = zone factor
I = importance factor
Sa/g = designed acceleration coefficient for diverse soil category corresponding to
Natural Period (Ta) of building.
Step-03: Base shear (Lateral load)
Entire design imaginative load or design lateral shear along any principal through
shall be resolute by following formulas,
𝐕𝐡 = 𝐀 𝐡 × 𝐖(Clause 7.6.1.of IS 1893 part I: 2016)

Where,
Ah=Design horizontal seismic coefficient for structure
W=Seismic weight of the building
Step-04: Design lateral load
𝐖𝐢 𝐡𝟐𝐢
𝐐𝐢 = 𝐕𝐛 ∑𝐧 𝟐
𝐢=𝟏 𝐖𝐢 𝐡𝐢
Where,
Qi = Design lateral force at floor number i
Wi = Seismic weight of floor number i
Hi = Height of floor from bottem
N = Number of storeys of building.
3.3.2 Response Spectrum Analysis

It is bends stratagem between the greatest reaction of SDOF framework exposed to indicate
seismic tremor soil movement and time (or recurrence). It can be deciphered as the locus
of the most extreme response of an SDOF framework for given damping quantity. It is in
this manner help in acquiring the pinnacle basic responses under direct range, that could be
operate for getting equivalent load created at building because of seismic tremor hence
persuade in quakequake not dangerous plan of building. Generally, response of an SDOF
skeleton is controlled by period-space or repetition area investigation, and for a set period

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
of the support, the greatest response is pulled out. That procedure proceeds for every one of
capacity of plausible periods of SDOF skeleton. Final plot through framework period on X-
pivot and response amount at Y-hub is the necessary comeback spectra 103 relating to
indicated damping proportion and info ground movement. The same procedure is done
through different damping magnitude to acquire by and large response spectra.
3.3.3 Linear Dynamic Analysis

Static strategies are proper when upper mode impact is not critical. It is commonly valid for
tiny, standard building. Subsequently, for high rise structure, building with twisting
abnormalities, or assymmetrical support, a strategy is essential. In the straight dynamic
method, the structure is displayed as a multi-level of-opportunity (MDOF) framework with
a direct elastic solidness lattice and a equivalent gooey damping network.
Seismic inforamation present make the most of either modular ghastly examination or
perious investigation be that as it may, in second cases, the relating interior force and
relocations are resolute to utilize direct elastic investigation. The upside of these direct
dynamic strategies as for straight static techniques that advanced modes could be thought
of. it may, they depend on direct elastic response and henceforth the appropriateness
diminishes with expanding nonlinear conduct, that is fairly accurate by worldwide power
decrease factors.
3.3.4. Pushover Analysis

An example of powers are functional to a basic model with the intention of incorporates
non-direct possessions, (for example, steel yield), and the all-out power is plotted against a
reference displacement to characterize a limit curve. This would then be able to be joined
with an interest curve (normally as an increasing speed acceleration-displacement response
spectrum (ADRS)). This diminishes the issue to a solitary level of opportunity (SDOF)
framework. Pushover analysis is a static, nonlinear methodology utilizing the rearranged
nonlinear strategy to seismic basic disfigurements. It is an gradual static analysis used to
decide power displacement relationship or limit curve, for structure or basic component.
This analysis includes flat loads in endorsed example to structure gradually, pushing the
structure and plotting shear power and related sidelong displacement at every augmentation,
until the structure or breakdown condition. The force of sidelong burden is gradually
SEISMIC ZONE-IV
expanded and succession of splits, yielding and plastic pivot arrangement and
disappointment of different segments are recorded. It can give noteworthy knowledge into
the frail connections in the seismic presentation of the structure.
3.4. METHOD SELECTED FOR ANALYSIS

3.4.1 Time History method-
 It is an imperative technique for structural seismic analysis specially when estimate

building response nonlinear.
 Linear period history study overcomes all the weakness of model comeback
continuum analysis
 In time history analysis the structural response is computed at some subsequent time
instants.
3.5. Response Reduction Factor

It is factor by which real lateral force ought to be diminished, to get the structure horizontal
power for duration of plan fundamental quake (DBE) shaking. The reaction decrease factor
(R) is essentially relied upon Over quality (Rs), Ductility (Rµ), Redundancy (RR).
3.6. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL
3.6.1. Material Property

The grade of the material which is used in these three models is given below in the form of
the table-3.1:
Table-3.1: Material Property

S.No Material Name Grade
1 Concrete M40 for beam & Column
2 Concrete M30 for Slab
3 Mild Steel (Fe250) I section & Tube Section

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
3.6.2. Load Parameter

The details of the load are given below in the form of the table-3.2, which are applied at the
models to analyze it.
Table-3.2: Load Parameter

S.No Load parameter Value
1 Dead load 6.9 KN/m
2 Live load on Beam 2.5 KN/m
3 Live load 4KN/m2
3.6.3. Geometrical Property of Model

 The details of the geometrical property of the model which is used to analyze it,
given in the details in table-3.3.
 In this table, we write the size of the beam, column, slab thickness, span of the
beam, height of the storey, etc
Table-3.3: Geometrical Parameter

S.No Building Parameter Dimension
1 Beam 350mm X 450mm, M40
2 Column 450mm X 550mm, M40
3 Slab 150mm, M30
4 Bottom storey height 3m
5 Height of every floor 3m
6 The total height of the building 45m
7 Area of the building 24mX24m

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
8 Span of beam 4m
3.6.4. Seismic Property

In the table-3.4, we provide the seismic parameter which is taken in the model for
analyzing.
Table-3.4: Seismic Parameter

1. Seismic zone Fourth
2. Seismic Zone Factor 0.24
3. Damping ratio 5%
4. Importance factor 1.2
5. Types of soil Type (II)
6. Response reduction factor 3 (OMRF)
7. Magnitude 7.8
8. Time history data Andaman, 10/08/2009 19:55:35 UTC
3.7. DETAILS VIEW OF THE MODEL
3.7.1. Plan and 3D view of RCC building (Model-01)

The figure of the Model-01 is given below which represent Plan, Elevation and 3D view of
the model-1:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-3.2: Plan of Model-01
Fig-3.3: Elevation of Model-01

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-3.4: 3D View of Model-01
3.7.2.Plan and 3D view of CFT Column building (Model-02)

The cross section of the CFT column in the building (Model-02) is given below in figure
and plan, elevation and 3D view same as RCC building.
Fig-3.5: Cross-section CFT Column of Model-02

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-3.8: 3D View of Model-02
3.7.3.Plan and 3D view of building (Model-03)

The cross section of the column in the building (Model-03) is given below in figure and
plan, elevation and 3D view same as RCC building.
Fig-3.9: Cross-section of Composite Column of Model-03

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Fig-3.12: 3-D View of Model-03

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
CHAPTER-4
RESULT AND ANALYSIS
4.1. INTRODUCTION
In this chapter of result and analysis, we gave result of all three models which is analyzed
by the Etabs software, and also provides details about every seismic parameter. We have
taken some seismic parameter based on these we compare model, this seismic parameter is
given below:
i. Natural period
ii. Base Shear
iii. Maximum Storey Displacement
iv. Storey Stiffness
v. Storey Drift
vi. Storey Acceleration
vii. Mode Shape
viii. Column Force
ix. Storey Overturning Moment
x. Base Reaction
xi. Joint Drift
4.2. NATURAL PERIOD

 According to the IS code 1893:part 01: 2016 which is used for dynamic analysis of
RCC building, the natural time defined as completion of one cycle of the structure
by the effect of the seismic forces or lateral force is known as the Natural period.
 According to Seismic Code 1893 part-1:2016, value of the natural period of the
building from G+1 to G+20 storey is existing between the 0.05 second to 2.00
second.
 If the RCC structure, which has more than G+ 20 storeys, then we should determine
the value of the natural period and frequency of the structure, according to the
Indian Standard Code 1893 part-1:2016. If the value of the natural period going to

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
be greater than the 2.00 second of the structure which has Storey less than G+20,
then we should redesign the structure.
 The table, as well as a graph of the natural period of this model, is given below:
Table-4.1: Natural Period

Mode Model-01-Period (sec) Model-02-Period (sec) Model-03-Period (sec)
1 2.058 1.715 1.696
2 1.908 1.667 1.655
3 1.784 1.529 1.517
4 0.678 0.556 0.549
5 0.626 0.537 0.532
6 0.584 0.493 0.489
7 0.387 0.313 0.309
8 0.355 0.298 0.296
9 0.338 0.279 0.276
10 0.267 0.21 0.207
11 0.243 0.197 0.195
12 0.232 0.186 0.183
13 0.2 0.152 0.149
14 0.18 0.141 0.139
15 0.173 0.134 0.131
16 0.163 0.116 0.113
17 0.158 0.112 0.104
18 0.148 0.106 0.103
19 0.148 0.104 0.099
20 0.14 0.104 0.097

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Natural Time Period

2.5
Natural Time period (sec)
2
1.5
Model-01-Period (sec)
1 Model-02-Period (sec)
0.5 Model-03-Period (sec)
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Number of Mode
Fig-4.1: Natural Period

From the above details, we can see from analyzing table and graph that the value of the
natural period is high in the Model-01 (Normal RCC) as judge against to the other
composite models.
4.3. BASE SHEAR

 According to the Indian Standard Code 1893 Part-01:2016 which used for seismic
analysis of RCC structure, the base shear is defined as the lateral forces which act
on the floor or at every storey due to seismic force.
 The variation of the base shear is increasing with increasing the height of the
building, and it also depends upon the dead load as well as live load.
 The value of the base shear depends upon some factor such as Importance factor,
Response Reduction Factor, type of the soil, acceleration due to gravity. If the value
of the zone factors increase then the value of the base shear or lateral force which
acting at every floor is also increased.
 The table and graph of base shear of these three models along the EX are given
below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Table-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX

Storey Model-01 Model-02 Model-03
Base 0 0 0
Storey01 3.1997 3.5597 3.5991
Storey02 12.7989 14.2387 14.3964
Storey03 28.7976 32.0372 32.392
Storey04 51.1958 56.955 57.5857
Storey05 79.9934 88.9921 89.9776
Storey06 115.1905 128.1486 129.5678
Storey07 156.7871 174.4245 176.3562
Storey08 204.7832 227.8198 230.3428
Storey09 259.1787 288.3344 291.5276
Storey10 319.9737 355.9684 359.9106
Storey11 387.1682 430.7218 435.4918
Storey12 460.7622 512.5946 518.2712
Storey13 540.7556 601.5867 608.2489
Storey14 627.1485 697.6982 705.4247
Storey15 668.0024 743.1478 751.3777
Base Shear Due to EX

800
Base Shear (KN)
600
400 Model-01
200 Model-02
0 Model-03
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Number of Storey
Fig-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
4.4. MAXIMUM STOREY DISPLACEMENT

 According to IS Code 1893 part-1:2016, maximum storey displacement is defined
as the displacement of storey due to lateral load (seismic force). The storey
displacement is measured from the ground.
 If the value of the maximum storey displacement is going maximum, then the
structure is easily collapsing, so during the designing of the RCC building, we
should keep in the mind that provides a sufficient amount of the steel to resist that
displacement without collapse of the building.
 The table and graph of the Maximum storey displacement of these three models are
given below at the maximum load combination:
Table-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement

Storey Model-01 (mm) Model-02 (mm) Model-03 (mm)
Base 0 0 0
Storey01 34.951 24.936 24.131
Storey02 54.519 41.701 40.631
Storey03 70.551 55.553 54.289
Storey04 85.153 67.944 66.481
Storey05 98.634 79.241 77.576
Storey06 111.038 89.549 87.683
Storey07 122.352 98.886 96.827
Storey08 132.563 107.254 105.01
Storey09 141.654 114.648 112.23
Storey10 149.613 121.062 118.482
Storey11 156.428 126.492 123.763
Storey12 162.093 130.937 128.072
Storey13 166.605 134.403 131.418
Storey14 169.981 136.926 133.838
Storey15 172.345 138.646 135.475

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey Displacement
200
180
Storey Displacement (mm) 160
140
120
100 Model-01 (mm)
80 Model-02 (mm)
60
40 Model-03 (mm)
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Number of Storey
Fig-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement

From the above table as well as the graph, we can see that value of the storey displacement
of the RCC is more as compared to the other model.
4.5.STOREY OVERTURNING MOMENT

 Storey overturning moment is defined as the moment which is produced due to the
apply the lateral load at each floor due to seismic activity, is known as the storey
overturning moment.
 The storey overturning moment depends upon the base shear and the height of the
building. If the height or base shear of the building is increasing then the value of
the storey overturning moment also increasing.
 If the value of the storey overturning moment geet high as compared to the design
value of the storey overturning moment of the structure, then that structure gets
collapse.
 The table and graph of Storey Overturning Moment of these three models is given
below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Table-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment

Storey Model-01 (KN-m) Model-02 (KN-m) Model-03 (KN-m)
Base 3059954 3059954 3059954
Storey01 722980.3 722980.3 722980.3
Storey02 698660.3 698660.3 698660.3
Storey03 670822.3 670822.3 670822.3
Storey04 639466.2 639466.2 639466.2
Storey05 604592.3 604592.3 604592.3
Storey06 566200.3 566200.3 566200.3
Storey07 524290.3 524290.3 524290.3
Storey08 478862.4 478862.4 478862.4
Storey09 429916.5 429916.5 429916.5
Storey10 377452.6 377452.6 377452.6
Storey11 321470.8 321470.8 321470.8
Storey12 261970.9 261970.9 261970.9
Storey13 198953.1 198953.1 198953.1
Storey14 132417.3 132417.3 132417.3
Storey15 62322.77 62332.85 62330.79
Overturning Momemt
4000000
Storey Overturning Moment
3000000
2000000 Model-01 (KN-m)

(KN-m)
1000000 Model-02 (KN-m)

Model-03 (KN-m)
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Number of Storey
Fig-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
From the above table as well as, we can see that value of the storey overturning moment is
almost same in all models.
4.6. STOREY DRIFT

 According to the IS 1893 part-01: 2016, “from clause 4.21, Storey Drift is the
relative displacement between the floor above or below storey under the
consideration.”
 Storey drift is also defined as the relative displacement of the two floors. Or it is the
multiplication of the base shear and storey stiffness.
 According to the Indian Standard code 1893 part-01: 2016, the value of the storey
drift should not be exceeding than 0.004 height of the floor.
 The graph and table of the storey drift of these three models are given below:
Table-4.5: Storey Drift

Storey Model-01 (S.D) Model-02(S.D) Model-03 (S.D)
Storey01 0.01165 0.008312 0.008044
Storey02 0.006565 0.005629 0.005541
Storey03 0.005354 0.004625 0.004559
Storey04 0.004868 0.00413 0.004064
Storey05 0.004494 0.003766 0.003699
Storey06 0.004135 0.003436 0.003369
Storey07 0.003772 0.003113 0.003048
Storey08 0.003404 0.002789 0.002728
Storey09 0.00303 0.002465 0.002407
Storey10 0.002653 0.002138 0.002084
Storey11 0.002272 0.00181 0.00176
Storey12 0.001888 0.001482 0.001436
Storey13 0.001504 0.001156 0.001115
Storey14 0.001126 0.000841 0.000807
Storey15 0.000798 0.000582 0.000554

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey Drift Due to EX

0.014
0.012
Storey Drift 0.01
0.008
Model-01
0.006
Model-02
0.004 Model-03
0.002
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Number of Storey
Fig-4.5: Storey Drift

From the above graph as well as from the table of the storey drift, the value of the storey
drift in the model-01 (normally RCC building) is high as compared to the other models.
4.7. STOREY STIFFNESS

 According to the Indian Standard Code 1893 part-01:2016, from the clause number
4.24, “the storey stiffness is defined as the total lateral translational stiffness of the
all lateral force-resisting elements in the storey considered in the principal plan
direction of the building.”
 In general words, the storey stiffness is defined as the ratio of the base shear or
lateral forces which is existing on the structure due to seismic activity to the storey
drift. The formula of the storey stiffness is given below:
Storey Stiffness (K) = (Base Shear / Storey Drift)
 When the value of the storey drift is high, then the value of the storey stiffness is
low, because the storey stiffness is inversely proportional to the storey drift.
 The table and graph the storey stiffness of all these three models are given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Table-4.6: Storey Stiffness

Storey Model-01 (KN/m) Model-02 (KN/m) Model-03 (KN/m)
Storey01 501720.1 727200 703663.7
Storey02 832773.1 987013.1 971514.6
Storey03 945071.4 1109396 1093787
Storey04 957958.2 1147479 1129074
Storey05 950508.9 1154958 1134269
Storey06 938620.9 1151852 1129496
Storey07 925269.7 1144939 1121204
Storey08 910498 1136029 1110968
Storey09 893623.7 1125249 1098765
Storey10 873425.5 1111882 1083753
Storey11 847834.2 1094287 1064157
Storey12 813057.6 1068880 1036250
Storey13 761071.8 1026322 990697
Storey14 671353.5 936673.9 898617.7
Storey15 468035.1 675828.4 643363.5
Storey Stiffness Due to EX (KN/m)

1300000
1200000
Stiffness (KN/m)
1100000
1000000
900000
Model-01 (KN/m)
800000
700000 Model-02 (KN/m)
600000
500000 Model-03 (KN/m)
400000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Number of Storey
Fig-4.6: Storey Stiffness

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
4.8. STOREY ACCELERATION

 The storey acceleration is defined as the acceleration of each storey due to applying
the seismic force. The main reason for the storey acceleration because during the
release of the seismic wave, the vibration will take place due to which storey of the
structure gets accelerates.
 The effect of the storey acceleration depends upon the plan and elevation of the
structure. If the horizontal direction, the effect of the storey acceleration is
maximum because the lateral force act in the horizontal direction.
 The effect of the storey acceleration on the structure in the vertical direction is low
as compared to the horizontal direction.
4.8.1.Storey Acceleration of the Model-01

 The table of the storey acceleration of the model-01 (normally RCC structure) is
given below due to the EX load case:
Table-4.7: Storey Acceleration Model-01

Storey Load UX UY UZ RX RY RZ
Case 2
(mm/sec ) (mm/sec )2 2
(mm/sec ) 2
(mm/sec ) (mm/sec )2
(mm/sec2)
Storey1 result 0.000084

5 Max 514.56 0.22 13.41 0.0001892 0.01 05
4 Max 510.89 0.1 13.22 0.0001054 0.013 6
3 Max 505.08 0.13 12.72 0.0001084 0.012 85
2 Max 500.22 0.17 12.12 0.0001018 0.007 8
1 Max 495.53 0.15 12.07 0.00009668 0.006 65
0 Max 487.35 0.16 11.98 0.00009282 0.008 27
Storey9 result 473.63 0.09 11.83 0.00009919 0.01 0.000039

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Max 75
result 0.000047
Storey8 Max 453.48 0.11 11.55 0.0001156 0.008 54
result 0.000088
Storey7 Max 432.95 0.21 11.1 0.0001334 0.008 95
result 0.000058
Storey6 Max 415.74 0.13 10.42 0.0001485 0.009 14
result 0.000058
Storey5 Max 394.97 0.14 9.46 0.0001549 0.012 21
result 0.000097
Storey4 Max 370.77 0.23 8.15 0.0001469 0.01 01
result 0.000062
Storey3 Max 350.48 0.15 6.48 0.0001218 0.008 94
result 0.000088
Storey2 Max 324.13 0.23 4.5 0.00008984 0.01 62
result 0.000266
Storey1 Max 284.84 0.49 2.31 0.0003355 0.015 8
result 0.000266
Base Max 207.86 0 0 0.0003994 0.032 8
From the above table, we can see that the value of the storey acceleration is maximum in
the X-direction and value of the storey acceleration is decreasing with decreasing in the
height of the building.
4.8.2. Storey Acceleration of the Model-02

The table of the storey acceleration of the model-02 (tube section column) is given below
due to the EX load case:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

Case 2
(mm/sec )2 2
(mm/sec2)
Storey result 0.000152

15 Max 526.28 0.46 5.75 0.000101 0.013 1
14 Max 514.62 0.09 5.7 0.0001395 0.013 31
Storey result 0.0000653 0.000176
13 Max 517.36 0.49 5.59 5 0.008 2
Storey result 0.0000938 0.000161
12 Max 516.65 0.44 5.41 3 0.009 6
11 Max 510.35 0.25 5.18 0.0001229 0.01 16
Storey result 0.0000469 0.000159
10 Max 498.35 0.43 4.93 9 0.009 3
9 Max 481.95 0.41 4.71 0.0001283 0.014 5
8 Max 462.59 0.41 4.48 0.0001106 0.011 5
Storey result 0.0000403 0.000198
7 Max 441.03 0.54 4.29 1 0.01 7
6 Max 417.45 0.19 4 0.0001417 0.008 07
5 Max 392.15 0.48 3.59 0.0001133 0.008 7
Storey result 0.0000504 0.000242
4 Max 364.47 0.65 3.05 9 0.009 3
3 Max 335.01 0.22 2.4 0.0001486 0.019 71
Storey result 302.59 0.45 1.66 0.0001264 0.017 0.000185

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
2 Max 3
Storey result 0.0000832 0.000355
1 Max 263.92 0.68 0.88 5 0.014 1
From the above table, we can see that the value of the storey acceleration is maximum in
the model-02 as compared to the model-01, it’s because the tube section column more
stable as compared to the normally RCC column.
4.8.3. Storey Acceleration of the Model-03

The table of the storey acceleration of the model-03 (I section provided with reinforcement
in the column) is given below due to the EX load case:

Case 2
(mm/sec )2
(mm/sec )2
(mm/sec )2
(mm/sec2)

5 Max 520.96 0.4 7.44 0.00009259 0.011 6
4 Max 514.57 0.1 7.38 0.0001148 0.012 63
3 Max 517.82 0.41 7.22 0.00005862 0.009 1
2 Max 516.79 0.39 6.96 0.00008496 0.011 3
1 Max 509.06 0.23 6.64 0.00009434 0.01 49
0 Max 495.18 0.39 6.28 0.00004391 0.01 6
result 0.000134
Storey9 Max 477.61 0.35 5.91 0.0001122 0.012 1
result 0.000137
Storey8 Max 458.67 0.36 5.53 0.0001004 0.009 2

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
result 0.000186
Storey7 Max 438.93 0.5 5.27 0.00004575 0.009 5
result 0.000067
Storey6 Max 417.27 0.17 4.92 0.0001237 0.007 08
result 0.000160
Storey5 Max 392.16 0.42 4.43 0.0001023 0.008 1
result 0.000224
Storey4 Max 363.07 0.6 3.78 0.00004516 0.009 8
result 0.000080
Storey3 Max 330.93 0.21 2.97 0.0001277 0.017 29
result 0.000173
Storey2 Max 299.47 0.42 2.04 0.0001214 0.017 7
result
Storey1 Max 262.31 0.65 1.04 0.00007737 0.014 0.000343
result
Base Max 207.86 0 0 0.0003409 0.021 0.000343
From the above table of the storey acceleration of the model-03, the value of the storey
acceleration of the model-03 is less as compared to the model-02
4.9. MODE SHAPE

 A mode shape is a precise model of vibration execute by an automatic system at a
definite frequency. Dissimilar mode shapes will be linked with dissimilar
frequencies. The trial method of modal analysis discovers these mode shapes and
the frequencies.
 According to Indian Standard Code 1893 part-1: 2016, from the clause number 3.17,
“The mode shape coefficient deformation pattern of the oscillation along the degree
of freedom, when the structure in its natural mode. A structure with N degree of the
freedom possesses N natural period and N associated natural mode shape.”

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
 In this project, we have taken the five number of the mode in each model such as
mode-1, mode-5, mode-10, mode-15 and mode-20.
4.9.1. Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-01

In the normally RCC column which is used in the model-01, the first mode shape generated
at the natural period is 2.058 second. The figure 4.7 given below:
Fig-4.7: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-01

In the normally RCC column which is used in the model-01, the fifth mode shape generated
at the natural period is 0.626 second. Figure 4.8 given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

In the normally RCC column which is used in the model-01, the tenth mode shape
generated at the natural period is 0.267 second. Figure 4.9 given below:

In the normally RCC column which is used in the model-01, the fifteen mode shape

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

In the normally RCC column which is used in the model-01, the twenty mode shape

In tube column which is used in the model-02, the first mode shape generated at the natural
period is 1.696 second. Figure 4.12 given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

In tube column which is used in the model-02, the fifth mode shape generated at the natural
period is 0.532 second. Figure 4.13 given below:

In tube column which is used in the model-02, the tenth mode shape generated at the
natural period is 0.207 second. Figure 4.14 given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

In tube column which is used in the model-02, the fifteen mode shape generated at the

In tube column which is used in the model-02, the twenty mode shape generated at the

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

In the column where I section and reinforcement is provided in the column, which is used
in the model-03, the first mode shape generated at the natural period is 1.715 second. Figure
4.17 given below:

in the model-03, the fifth mode shape generated at the natural period is 0.537 second.
Figure 4.18 given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

in the model-03, the tenth mode shape generated at the natural period is 0.210 second.

in the model-03, the fifteen mode shape generated at the natural period is 0.134 second.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

in the model-03, the twenty mode shape generated at the natural period is 0.104 second.
4.10. COLUMN FORCE

 Column force is defined as the force which is an act at the column due to applying
the dead, live wind, seismic or another load.
 We taken column forces at every storey at station 0m and load is due to the seismic
force in the X-direction, which is applied in the model by using the Etabs Software.
4.10.1. Column Force in Model-01

 The table of the column force of the Model-01 (normally RCC column in the

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Table-4.10: Column Force of Model-01

Storey P (KN) V2 (KN) V3 (KN) T (KN-m) M2 (KN-m) M3 (KN-m)
Storey15 2.2244 6.9809 -0.9322 -0.1345 -1.2097 16.7807
Storey14 -3.5583 -8.7708 -1.12 0.0296 -1.7686 1.0723
Storey13 -22.934 -17.5334 -1.3926 -0.0009 -2.185 -12.4921
Storey12 -55.8252 -27.0971 -1.7352 0.0002 -2.6884 -26.7373
Storey11 -102.3839 -36.5608 -2.0614 -0.0005 -3.1799 -41.0488
Storey10 -162.6815 -46.1026 -2.3889 -0.0008 -3.6699 -55.515
Storey09 -236.8372 -55.7436 -2.7111 -0.0011 -4.1516 -70.178
Storey08 -325.0186 -65.5248 -3.0256 -0.0014 -4.6207 -85.0944
Storey07 -427.4473 -75.4887 -3.3294 -0.0016 -5.0733 -100.322
Storey06 -544.4072 -85.6497 -3.6169 -0.0017 -5.4988 -115.844
Storey05 -676.2841 -96.1357 -3.9006 0.0033 -5.9273 -131.772
Storey04 -823.7508 -106.0112 -4.09 0.008 -6.1389 -144.869
Storey03 -989.1013 -118.6517 -4.7637 0.1664 -7.3126 -158.942
-39.51
Storey02 -1181.47 -92.575 -5.397 -0.8054 -9.381
Storey01 -1467.205 -187.4291 -2.8871 0 0 0
 From the above table of the column force of the model-01, the value of the axial
forces is increasing with decreasing in the height of the building.
 The value of the shear force in the column is also increasing with decreasing in the
height of the building.
 The value of the torsion force and moment at the storey-01 is zero.

 The table of the column force of the Model-02 (tube section column in the
structure), is given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

Storey15 -4.7267 4.0033 -0.9531 -0.2517 -0.8937 20.8453
Storey14 -17.416 -11.6996 -1.337 0.0341 -1.9796 9.7403
Storey13 -42.4839 -20.4779 -1.4275 0.0086 -2.3055 -2.4108
Storey12 -80.581 -29.7444 -1.8118 0.0024 -2.8154 -15.791
Storey11 -132.0088 -38.9089 -2.1561 -0.0002 -3.3308 -29.4999
Storey10 -196.8872 -48.1054 -2.4975 -0.0011 -3.8422 -43.385
Storey09 -275.3053 -57.3524 -2.8344 -0.0014 -4.3461 -57.4015
Storey08 -367.3608 -66.6659 -3.1655 -0.0012 -4.8405 -71.5288
Storey07 -473.1803 -76.0515 -3.4902 0.0003 -5.3257 -85.6982
Storey06 -592.9567 -85.4751 -3.8029 0.0056 -5.788 -99.597
Storey05 -727.0672 -94.8685 -4.0999 0.0238 -6.1929 -112.325
Storey04 -876.4934 -103.329 -4.3706 0.0447 -6.41 -119.088
Storey03 -1044.230 -111.766 -6.0495 0.0021 -10.3815 -113.667
Storey02 -1239.722 -89.4919 -3.6889 -1.61 -6.2278 15.3816
Storey01 -1501.209 -183.9922 -4.5459 0 0 0
 From the above table, we can see that the value of the axial forces in the column is
more than shear force in the column.

 Model-03, in which I section provided and also reinforcement used in the column
and that column is used in the RCC structure. The table of column force of that
model-03 is given below:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

Storey15 -3.5693 4.7351 -0.974 -0.2532 -0.9216 20.691
Storey14 -15.0944 -11.1099 -1.36 0.0345 -2.0185 8.9368
Storey13 -39.1424 -19.8523 -1.4534 0.0075 -2.3463 -3.426
Storey12 -76.2801 -29.138 -1.8429 0.0019 -2.864 -16.9239
Storey11 -126.7899 -38.3256 -2.19 -0.0004 -3.3846 -30.7089
Storey10 -190.7854 -47.5536 -2.5347 -0.0012 -3.9009 -44.6658
Storey09 -268.3602 -56.841 -2.8747 -0.0017 -4.4091 -58.7667
Storey08 -359.6221 -66.2068 -3.2082 -0.0016 -4.9069 -73.005
Storey07 -464.7102 -75.6618 -3.5342 -0.0004 -5.3937 -87.3351
Storey06 -583.8278 -85.1795 -3.8472 0.0041 -5.8568 -101.492
Storey05 -717.3518 -94.7121 -4.1434 0.0215 -6.2648 -114.708
Storey04 -866.2362 -103.3572 -4.3939 0.0447 -6.4408 -122.369
Storey03 -1033.444 -112.199 -6.0524 0.0286 -10.3256 -118.970
Storey02 -1228.580 -89.5053 -3.8244 -1.5563 -6.5092 9.684
Storey01 -1492.470 -184.0484 -4.5141 0 0 0
 From the above table, we can analyze that the value of the shear force along the X-
direction is maximum as compared to axial force in that column.
4.11. DESIGN REACTION

Design reaction is defined as the vertical force which is produced to resist the load which
acting on the structure. Based on the design reaction, we design the foundation to resist that
load. The value of the design reaction is mainly maximum in the vertical direction. The
value of the design reaction of these three models is given below due to load case EX.
4.11.1.Design Reaction of Model-01

The value of the design reaction of the model-01 (where the normal RCC column is used in the
RCC building) is given below in the form of the table due to load combination or load case:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Table-4.13: Design Reaction of Model-01

Storey Unique
Joint Label Name FX (KN) FY (KN) FZ (KN)
Base 1 16 188.5801 2.8871 1467.2059
Base 2 32 196.8245 0.1506 1562.6811
Base 3 48 197.1622 0.1646 1568.4822
Base 4 64 197.2415 0 1569.5629
Base 5 80 197.1622 -0.1646 1568.4822
Base 6 96 196.8245 -0.1506 1562.6811
Base 7 112 188.5801 -2.8871 1467.2059
Base 8 128 251.4476 -0.1983 157.7218
Base 9 144 262.0085 0.1033 159.8674
Base 10 160 262.3412 0.0549 163.6301
Base 11 176 262.4188 0 164.2962
Base 12 192 262.3412 -0.0549 163.6301
Base 13 208 262.0085 -0.1033 159.8674
Base 14 224 251.4476 0.1983 157.7218
Base 15 240 248.5317 0.0612 41.7082
Base 16 256 258.3967 0.0234 44.6084
Base 17 272 258.6791 0.0123 45.7621
Base 18 288 258.7589 0 46.0114
Base 19 304 258.6791 -0.0123 45.7621
Base 20 320 258.3967 -0.0234 44.6084
Base 21 336 248.5317 -0.0612 41.7082
Base 22 352 248.5317 -0.0612 -41.7082
Base 23 368 258.3967 -0.0234 -44.6084
Base 24 384 258.6791 -0.0123 -45.7621
Base 25 400 258.7589 0 -46.0114

The value of the design reaction of the model-02 (where the tube column is used in the RCC
building) is given below in the form of the table due to load combination or load case:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

Storey Unique
Base 1 16 185.1432 4.5459 1501.209
Base 2 32 194.6643 1.1033 1625.5849
Base 3 48 195.218 0.5441 1633.6018
Base 4 64 195.3646 0 1634.4291
Base 5 80 195.218 -0.5441 1633.6018
Base 6 96 194.6643 -1.1033 1625.5849
Base 7 112 185.1432 -4.5459 1501.209
Base 8 128 249.3976 0.0288 90.2597
Base 9 144 262.6734 0.3016 91.6529
Base 10 160 263.243 0.1832 94.4393
Base 11 176 263.3977 0 94.8018
Base 12 192 263.243 -0.1832 94.4393
Base 13 208 262.6734 -0.3016 91.6529
Base 14 224 249.3976 -0.0288 90.2597
Base 15 240 248.3074 0.1424 13.3496
Base 16 256 260.6755 0.0678 14.7324
Base 17 272 261.1823 0.0379 15.2066
Base 18 288 261.3389 0 15.2928
Base 19 304 261.1823 -0.0379 15.2066
Base 20 320 260.6755 -0.0678 14.7324
Base 21 336 248.3074 -0.1424 13.3496
Base 22 352 248.3074 -0.1424 -13.3496
Base 23 368 260.6755 -0.0678 -14.7324
Base 24 384 261.1823 -0.0379 -15.2066
Base 25 400 261.3389 0 -15.2928

The value of the design reaction of the model-03 (where the CFST column is used in the RCC
building) is given below in the form of the table due to load combination or load case:

SEISMIC ZONE-IV

Storey Unique
Base 1 16 185.1994 4.5141 1492.4705
Base 2 32 194.5889 1.0638 1610.5987
Base 3 48 195.1107 0.5261 1618.9745
Base 4 64 195.2481 0 1619.9478
Base 5 80 195.1107 -0.5261 1618.9745
Base 6 96 194.5889 -1.0638 1610.5987
Base 7 112 185.1994 -4.5141 1492.4705
Base 8 128 249.6561 0.0089 106.5869
Base 9 144 262.7299 0.2928 108.8316
Base 10 160 263.2648 0.1773 111.972
Base 11 176 263.4091 0 112.4338
Base 12 192 263.2648 -0.1773 111.972
Base 13 208 262.7299 -0.2928 108.8316
Base 14 224 249.6561 -0.0089 106.5869
Base 15 240 248.4161 0.1385 17.9141
Base 16 256 260.6072 0.0654 19.6361
Base 17 272 261.0825 0.0365 20.2614
Base 18 288 261.2285 0 20.3843
Base 19 304 261.0825 -0.0365 20.2614
Base 20 320 260.6072 -0.0654 19.6361
Base 21 336 248.4161 -0.1385 17.9141
Base 22 352 248.4161 -0.1385 -17.9141
Base 23 368 260.6072 -0.0654 -19.6361
Base 24 384 261.0825 -0.0365 -20.2614
Base 25 400 261.2285 0 -20.3843
4.12.JOINT DRIFT
It is defined as the relative displacement between two joint at each storey due to load case.After
analysis of these three models such as normal RCC column, tube column and CFST column. At
every storey there are fourty nine joint at every storey of all these three models. We selected load
case EX due to which taken joint drift. We taken sixnumber of the joint at each floor.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
4.12.1.Joint Drift for Model-01

The numerical value of joint drift of the model-1(where the noramal RCC column is
provided) is given below due to load case EX.
Table-4.16: Joint Drift for Model-01

Storey Label Displacement Displacement Drift X Drift Y
X (mm) Y (mm)
Storey15 1 -114.865 0.0004142 0.00052 0.000002
Storey15 2 -114.866 -0.0004297 0.000519 0.000001
Storey15 3 -114.868 -0.0004913 0.000519 0.000001
Storey15 4 -114.868 1.018E-09 0.000519 0
Storey15 5 -114.868 0.0004913 0.000519 0.000001
Storey15 6 -114.866 0.0004297 0.000519 0.000001
Storey14 1 -113.304 -0.005 0.000747 0.000000481
Storey14 2 -113.309 -0.004 0.000748 2.622E-07
Storey14 3 -113.312 -0.002 0.000748 1.067E-07
Storey14 4 -113.313 1.005E-09 0.000748 0
Storey14 5 -113.312 0.002 0.000748 1.067E-07
Storey14 6 -113.309 0.004 0.000748 2.622E-07
Storey13 1 -111.062 -0.004 0.001003 0
Storey13 2 -111.066 -0.003 0.001003 6.934E-09
Storey13 3 -111.069 -0.002 0.001003 7.087E-09
Storey13 4 -111.07 9.876E-10 0.001003 0
Storey13 5 -111.069 0.002 0.001003 7.087E-09
Storey13 6 -111.066 0.003 0.001003 6.934E-09
Storey12 1 -108.054 -0.004 0.001259 0
Storey12 2 -108.059 -0.003 0.001259 0
Storey12 3 -108.061 -0.002 0.001259 0
Storey12 4 -108.062 9.637E-10 0.001259 0
Storey12 5 -108.061 0.002 0.001259 0
Storey12 6 -108.059 0.003 0.001259 0
Storey11 1 -104.277 -0.004 0.001515 6.304E-09
Storey11 2 -104.282 -0.003 0.001515 0
Storey11 3 -104.284 -0.002 0.001515 0
Storey11 4 -104.285 9.32E-10 0.001515 0
Storey11 5 -104.284 0.002 0.001515 0
Storey11 6 -104.282 0.003 0.001515 0
Storey10 1 -99.733 -0.004 0.001769 1.054E-08

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey10 2 -99.738 -0.003 0.001769 6.669E-09

Storey10 3 -99.74 -0.002 0.001769 0
Storey10 4 -99.741 8.92E-10 0.001769 0
Storey10 5 -99.74 0.002 0.001769 0
Storey10 6 -99.738 0.003 0.001769 6.669E-09
Storey9 1 -94.428 -0.004 0.00202 1.433E-08
Storey9 2 -94.432 -0.003 0.00202 8.952E-09
Storey9 3 -94.434 -0.002 0.00202 0
Storey9 4 -94.435 8.421E-10 0.00202 0
Storey9 5 -94.434 0.002 0.00202 0
Storey9 6 -94.432 0.003 0.00202 8.952E-09
Storey8 1 -88.367 -0.004 0.002269 1.815E-08
Storey8 2 -88.371 -0.003 0.002269 1.121E-08
Storey8 3 -88.374 -0.002 0.002269 0
Storey8 4 -88.374 7.817E-10 0.002269 0
Storey8 5 -88.374 0.002 0.002269 0
Storey8 6 -88.371 0.003 0.002269 1.121E-08
Storey7 1 -81.56 -0.004 0.002514 2.134E-08
Storey7 2 -81.564 -0.003 0.002514 1.313E-08
Storey7 3 -81.567 -0.002 0.002514 5.563E-09
Storey7 4 -81.567 7.145E-10 0.002514 0
Storey7 5 -81.567 0.002 0.002514 5.562E-09
Storey7 6 -81.564 0.003 0.002514 1.313E-08
Storey6 1 -74.016 -0.004 0.002756 2.093E-08
Storey6 2 -74.021 -0.003 0.002756 1.204E-08
Storey6 3 -74.023 -0.002 0.002756 0
Storey6 4 -74.024 6.42E-10 0.002756 0
Storey6 5 -74.023 0.002 0.002756 0
Storey6 6 -74.021 0.003 0.002756 1.204E-08
Storey5 1 -65.747 -0.004 0.002996 1.037E-08
Storey5 2 -65.752 -0.003 0.002996 1.444E-08
Storey5 3 -65.754 -0.002 0.002996 6.988E-09
Storey5 4 -65.755 5.652E-10 0.002996 0
Storey5 5 -65.754 0.002 0.002996 6.988E-09
Storey5 6 -65.752 0.003 0.002996 1.444E-08
Storey4 1 -56.759 -0.004 0.003245 2.365E-07
Storey4 2 -56.764 -0.003 0.003245 2.247E-07
Storey4 3 -56.766 -0.002 0.003245 1.305E-07

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey4 4 -56.767 4.85E-10 0.003245 0

Storey4 5 -56.766 0.002 0.003245 1.305E-07
Storey4 6 -56.764 0.003 0.003245 2.247E-07
Storey3 1 -47.025 -0.004 0.00356 0.000003
Storey3 2 -47.029 -0.003 0.003564 0.000001
Storey3 3 -47.031 -0.001 0.003564 0.000001
Storey3 4 -47.032 4.012E-10 0.003564 0
Storey3 5 -47.031 0.001 0.003564 0.000001
Storey3 6 -47.029 0.003 0.003564 0.000001
Storey2 1 -36.345 0.004 0.004375 0.000011
Storey2 2 -36.339 0.001 0.004361 0.000007
Storey2 3 -36.339 0.0003228 0.004358 0.000003
Storey2 4 -36.339 3.126E-10 0.004357 0
Storey2 5 -36.339 -0.0003228 0.004358 0.000003
Storey2 6 -36.339 -0.001 0.004361 0.000007
Storey1 1 -23.22 -0.029 0.00774 0.00001
Storey1 2 -23.254 -0.019 0.007751 0.000006
Storey1 3 -23.265 -0.009 0.007755 0.000003
Storey1 4 -23.268 2.088E-10 0.007756 0
Storey1 5 -23.265 0.009 0.007755 0.000003
Storey1 6 -23.254 0.019 0.007751 0.000006

The numerical value of joint drift of the model-02(where the tube RCC column is provided)
is given below due to load case EX.

X (mm) Y (mm)
Storey15 1 -90.292 -0.0002409 0.000361 0.000002
Storey15 2 -90.294 -0.001 0.000359 0.000001
Storey15 3 -90.296 -0.001 0.000359 4.336E-07
Storey15 4 -90.296 4.968E-10 0.000359 0
Storey15 5 -90.296 0.001 0.000359 4.336E-07
Storey15 6 -90.294 0.001 0.000359 0.000001
Storey14 1 -89.21 -0.005 0.000535 3.272E-07
Storey14 2 -89.216 -0.004 0.000536 1.701E-07

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey14 3 -89.218 -0.002 0.000536 5.995E-08

Storey14 4 -89.219 4.874E-10 0.000536 0
Storey14 5 -89.218 0.002 0.000536 5.995E-08
Storey14 6 -89.216 0.004 0.000536 1.701E-07
Storey13 1 -87.604 -0.004 0.000743 1.094E-07
Storey13 2 -87.608 -0.003 0.000743 8.011E-08
Storey13 3 -87.611 -0.002 0.000744 4.354E-08
Storey13 4 -87.612 4.757E-10 0.000744 0
Storey13 5 -87.611 0.002 0.000744 4.354E-08
Storey13 6 -87.608 0.003 0.000743 8.011E-08
Storey12 1 -85.374 -0.004 0.000958 0
Storey12 2 -85.378 -0.003 0.000958 0
Storey12 3 -85.38 -0.002 0.000958 0
Storey12 4 -85.381 4.614E-10 0.000958 0
Storey12 5 -85.38 0.002 0.000958 0
Storey12 6 -85.378 0.003 0.000958 0
Storey11 1 -82.501 -0.004 0.001174 0
Storey11 2 -82.505 -0.003 0.001174 0
Storey11 3 -82.507 -0.002 0.001174 0
Storey11 4 -82.508 4.435E-10 0.001174 0
Storey11 5 -82.507 0.002 0.001174 0
Storey11 6 -82.505 0.003 0.001174 0
Storey10 1 -78.98 -0.004 0.001389 5.736E-09
Storey10 2 -78.985 -0.003 0.001389 0
Storey10 3 -78.987 -0.002 0.001389 0
Storey10 4 -78.988 4.214E-10 0.001389 0
Storey10 5 -78.987 0.002 0.001389 0
Storey10 6 -78.985 0.003 0.001389 0
Storey9 1 -74.813 -0.004 0.001604 7.287E-09
Storey9 2 -74.817 -0.003 0.001604 0
Storey9 3 -74.819 -0.002 0.001604 0
Storey9 4 -74.82 3.954E-10 0.001604 0
Storey9 5 -74.819 0.002 0.001604 0
Storey9 6 -74.817 0.003 0.001604 0
Storey8 1 -69.999 -0.004 0.001819 7.455E-09
Storey8 2 -70.004 -0.003 0.001819 0
Storey8 3 -70.006 -0.002 0.001819 0
Storey8 4 -70.006 3.657E-10 0.001819 0

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey8 5 -70.006 0.002 0.001819 0

Storey8 6 -70.004 0.003 0.001819 0
Storey7 1 -64.544 -0.004 0.002032 6.585E-09
Storey7 2 -64.548 -0.003 0.002032 0
Storey7 3 -64.55 -0.002 0.002032 0
Storey7 4 -64.551 3.325E-10 0.002032 0
Storey7 5 -64.55 0.002 0.002032 0
Storey7 6 -64.548 0.003 0.002032 0
Storey6 1 -58.448 -0.004 0.002246 0
Storey6 2 -58.452 -0.003 0.002246 0
Storey6 3 -58.454 -0.002 0.002246 0
Storey6 4 -58.455 2.964E-10 0.002246 0
Storey6 5 -58.454 0.002 0.002246 0
Storey6 6 -58.452 0.003 0.002246 0
Storey5 1 -51.709 -0.004 0.002466 9.984E-08
Storey5 2 -51.714 -0.003 0.002466 7.461E-08
Storey5 3 -51.716 -0.002 0.002466 4.294E-08
Storey5 4 -51.717 2.577E-10 0.002466 0
Storey5 5 -51.716 0.002 0.002466 4.294E-08
Storey5 6 -51.714 0.003 0.002466 7.461E-08
Storey4 1 -44.313 -0.004 0.002708 0.000001
Storey4 2 -44.317 -0.003 0.002709 0.000001
Storey4 3 -44.319 -0.002 0.002709 2.694E-07
Storey4 4 -44.32 2.164E-10 0.002709 0
Storey4 5 -44.319 0.002 0.002709 2.694E-07
Storey4 6 -44.317 0.003 0.002709 0.000001
Storey3 1 -36.188 -0.001 0.003034 2.001E-07
Storey3 2 -36.19 -0.001 0.003035 1.743E-07
Storey3 3 -36.191 -0.001 0.003035 1.723E-07
Storey3 4 -36.192 1.728E-10 0.003035 0
Storey3 5 -36.191 0.001 0.003035 1.723E-07
Storey3 6 -36.19 0.001 0.003035 1.743E-07
Storey2 1 -27.087 -0.001 0.003693 0.000008
Storey2 2 -27.084 -0.002 0.003681 0.000005
Storey2 3 -27.085 -0.001 0.003678 0.000002
Storey2 4 -27.086 1.255E-10 0.003677 0
Storey2 5 -27.085 0.001 0.003678 0.000002
Storey2 6 -27.084 0.002 0.003681 0.000005

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey1 1 -16.009 -0.025 0.005336 0.000008

Storey1 2 -16.041 -0.016 0.005347 0.000005
Storey1 3 -16.051 -0.008 0.00535 0.000003
Storey1 4 -16.054 7.14E-11 0.005351 0
Storey1 5 -16.051 0.008 0.00535 0.000003
Storey1 6 -16.041 0.016 0.005347 0.000005

The numerical value of joint drift of the model-03(where RCC column with I section steel
is provided) is given below due to load case EX.

X (mm) Y (mm)
Storey15 1 -92.405 -0.00001412 0.000379 0.000002
Storey15 2 -92.407 -0.001 0.000378 0.000001
Storey15 3 -92.408 -0.001 0.000377 4.619E-07
Storey15 4 -92.409 5.324E-10 0.000377 0
Storey15 5 -92.408 0.001 0.000377 4.619E-07
Storey15 6 -92.407 0.001 0.000378 0.000001
Storey14 1 -91.268 -0.005 0.000558 3.436E-07
Storey14 2 -91.274 -0.004 0.000558 1.811E-07
Storey14 3 -91.277 -0.002 0.000559 6.483E-08
Storey14 4 -91.277 5.23E-10 0.000559 0
Storey14 5 -91.277 0.002 0.000559 6.483E-08
Storey14 6 -91.274 0.004 0.000558 1.811E-07
Storey13 1 -89.594 -0.004 0.00077 1.049E-07
Storey13 2 -89.599 -0.003 0.00077 7.719E-08
Storey13 3 -89.601 -0.002 0.00077 4.218E-08
Storey13 4 -89.602 5.102E-10 0.00077 0
Storey13 5 -89.601 0.002 0.00077 4.218E-08
Storey13 6 -89.599 0.003 0.00077 7.719E-08
Storey12 1 -87.284 -0.004 0.000988 5.803E-09
Storey12 2 -87.288 -0.003 0.000988 0
Storey12 3 -87.29 -0.002 0.000988 0
Storey12 4 -87.291 4.944E-10 0.000988 0
Storey12 5 -87.29 0.002 0.000988 0

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey12 6 -87.288 0.003 0.000988 0

Storey11 1 -84.321 -0.004 0.001207 5.624E-09
Storey11 2 -84.325 -0.003 0.001207 0
Storey11 3 -84.327 -0.002 0.001207 0
Storey11 4 -84.328 4.754E-10 0.001207 0
Storey11 5 -84.327 0.002 0.001207 0
Storey11 6 -84.325 0.003 0.001207 0
Storey10 1 -80.7 -0.004 0.001425 6.706E-09
Storey10 2 -80.705 -0.003 0.001425 0
Storey10 3 -80.707 -0.002 0.001425 0
Storey10 4 -80.708 4.532E-10 0.001425 0
Storey10 5 -80.707 0.002 0.001425 0
Storey10 6 -80.705 0.003 0.001425 0
Storey9 1 -76.424 -0.004 0.001643 8.651E-09
Storey9 2 -76.428 -0.003 0.001643 5.543E-09
Storey9 3 -76.431 -0.002 0.001643 0
Storey9 4 -76.431 4.279E-10 0.001643 0
Storey9 5 -76.431 0.002 0.001643 0
Storey9 6 -76.428 0.003 0.001643 5.543E-09
Storey8 1 -71.495 -0.004 0.00186 9.356E-09
Storey8 2 -71.499 -0.003 0.00186 5.967E-09
Storey8 3 -71.501 -0.002 0.00186 0
Storey8 4 -71.502 3.985E-10 0.00186 0
Storey8 5 -71.501 0.002 0.00186 0
Storey8 6 -71.499 0.003 0.00186 5.967E-09
Storey7 1 -65.916 -0.004 0.002075 9.046E-09
Storey7 2 -65.92 -0.003 0.002075 5.961E-09
Storey7 3 -65.923 -0.002 0.002075 0
Storey7 4 -65.923 3.655E-10 0.002075 0
Storey7 5 -65.923 0.002 0.002075 0
Storey7 6 -65.92 0.003 0.002075 5.961E-09
Storey6 1 -59.691 -0.004 0.002291 5.707E-09
Storey6 2 -59.695 -0.003 0.002291 5.942E-09
Storey6 3 -59.698 -0.002 0.002291 0
Storey6 4 -59.698 3.289E-10 0.002291 0
Storey6 5 -59.698 0.002 0.002291 0
Storey6 6 -59.695 0.003 0.002291 5.942E-09
Storey5 1 -52.82 -0.004 0.00251 8.442E-08

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
Storey5 2 -52.824 -0.003 0.002511 6.306E-08

Storey5 3 -52.826 -0.002 0.002511 3.671E-08
Storey5 4 -52.827 2.883E-10 0.002511 0
Storey5 5 -52.826 0.002 0.002511 3.671E-08
Storey5 6 -52.824 0.003 0.002511 6.306E-08
Storey4 1 -45.288 -0.004 0.002752 0.000001
Storey4 2 -45.292 -0.003 0.002753 0.000001
Storey4 3 -45.294 -0.002 0.002753 2.674E-07
Storey4 4 -45.295 2.438E-10 0.002753 0
Storey4 5 -45.294 0.002 0.002753 2.674E-07
Storey4 6 -45.292 0.003 0.002753 0.000001
Storey3 1 -37.031 -0.002 0.003077 3.453E-07
Storey3 2 -37.033 -0.001 0.003079 7.975E-08
Storey3 3 -37.034 -0.001 0.003079 1.247E-07
Storey3 4 -37.035 1.952E-10 0.003079 0
Storey3 5 -37.034 0.001 0.003079 1.247E-07
Storey3 6 -37.033 0.001 0.003079 7.975E-08
Storey2 1 -27.8 -0.0004755 0.003751 0.000008
Storey2 2 -27.797 -0.002 0.00374 0.000005
Storey2 3 -27.798 -0.001 0.003737 0.000002
Storey2 4 -27.798 1.421E-10 0.003736 0
Storey2 5 -27.798 0.001 0.003737 0.000002
Storey2 6 -27.797 0.002 0.00374 0.000005
Storey1 1 -16.546 -0.025 0.005515 0.000008
Storey1 2 -16.578 -0.016 0.005526 0.000005
Storey1 3 -16.588 -0.008 0.005529 0.000003
Storey1 4 -16.591 8.112E-11 0.00553 0
Storey1 5 -16.588 0.008 0.005529 0.000003
Storey1 6 -16.578 0.016 0.005526 0.000005

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
CHAPTER-5
CONCLUSIONS
After analyzing the above parameter of the analysis of all models in which the first model is
RCC building and the second model is CFT column and the third model is I section with
rebar in the column. The following conclusion comes out after analysis:
i. The value of the base shear in the RCC building is less about 12.42% compared to
the model-03 were in the column, I section provided with rebar. The value of the
base shear in RCC is less than 11.21% as compared to the CFT column in the
structure (Model-02).
ii. The value of the storey drift is found 40.10% more than as compared to the model-
02 and model-03 which is obtained by applied the earthquake force in the x-
direction. The value of the storey drift due EY is also same because the number and
length of the bay in the X direction is the same in the Y direction. The value of the
storey drift is safe because it should not exceed than 0.004 height of storey
according to the IS code 1893 part-1 2016.
iii. The value of the storey displacement is maximum in the RCC building and which is
more than 40% as compared to the Model-02 and 42.25 % as compared to the
model-03.
iv. The value of the natural period in the RCC building (Model-01) is more as
compared to the all other two models. The value of the natural period in model-01 is
20% more as compared to model-02 and 21.23% more as compared to the model-
03.
v. After comparing the result of the mode shape of the three models, then we find that
mode shape of the model-01 at mode-01 is developed at the 2.058 second, which is
maximum as compared to the model-02 and model-03.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
vi. The value of the storey acceleration of the Model-02 in UX is maximum as

compared to the other models, so we can say that model-02 is more flexible as
compared to the other model.
vii. The value of the axial in the column due to EX forces in the Model-01 is minimum
as compared to the model-02 and model-03. The value of the torsion and moment at
the storey-01 is zero so its means that we do not need to the extra reinforcement in
the models at the storey-01.
viii. From the above table of the design reaction, we can see that value of the design
reaction of the model-01 is maximum as compared to model-02 and model-03, so
the cost of the constructimng the foundation to resist the design reaction is more as
compared to other models, but the model-02 have low value of the design reaction
so its is more economical as compared to other models.

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
REFERENCES
1. Dai Gil lee et al, Experimental investigation of the dynamic characteristic of carbon
fiber epoxy composite thin beams, Composite Structures 33, Issue 2, (1995) 77-86
2. Ghoneam S. M. (1995). Dynamic analysis of open cracked laminated composite
beams.Composite Structures 32 (1995) 3-11.
3. Gounaris G.D., Papadopoulos CA, Dimarogonas AD. (1996). Crack identification
in beams by coupled response measurement. Comput Struct; 58(2):299–305.
4. D G Lee et al, Damping improvement of machine tool column with polymer matrix
fibre composite material, Composite Structures (1998): 155-163
5. Hamada A. Abd El-Hamid (1998). An investigation into the Eigen-nature of
cracked composite beams. Composite Structure Vol. 38, No. l - 4, pp. 45-55.
6. Ahmed Maher et al, Modelling of vibration damping in composite structures,
Composite Structures (1999): 163-170
7. P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design,
Earthquake Spect. 16 (3) (August 2000) 573–592.
8. Dai Gil lee et al, Steel composite hybrid headstock for high precision grinding
machines, Composite Structures (2001): 1-8
9. Dai Gil lee et al, Damping characteristic of composite hybrid spindle covers for
high Speed machine, Journal of Materials processing technology, 113, (2001); 178-
183
10. Banerjee J. R. (2001). Frequency equation and mode shape formulae for composite
Timoshenko beams. Composite Structures 51 (2001) 381-388.
11. Binici B. (2005) Vibration of beams with multiple open cracks subjected to axial
force. J Sound Vib; 287(1-2):277–95.
12. Goyal Vijay K., Kapania Rakesh K. (2008). Dynamic stability of laminated beams
subjected to non-conservative loading. Thin-Walled Structures 46 (2008) 1359–
1369.
13. Ketan Patela, Sonal Thakkarb* Analysis Of CFT, RCC And Steel Building
Subjected To Lateral Loading, ScienceDirect, 2012, 51 ( 2013 ) 259 – 265

SEISMIC ZONE-IV
14. Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis, Seismic Analysis of Steel–Concrete Composite

Buildings: Numerical Modeling.2014, ScienceDirect, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-
36197-5_125-1
15. Sameh A. El-Betar, Seismic performance of existing R.C. framed Buildings.2015,
Elsevier
16. Pramodini Naik1, Satish Annigeri2, Performance Evaluation of ( storey RC
building located in North Goa. ScienceDirect. 2016, Procedia Engineering 173 (
2017 ) 1841 – 1846
17. Jingming Cai, Jinlong Pan (2018) “Behaviour of ECC-encased CFST columns
under axial compression” ELSEVIER vol-171, pp 1-9.
18. IS: 1893-2016, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Bureau of
Indian Standard, New Delhi.
19. IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian
Standard, New Delhi.
20. IS 800-2007, Code of practice for general construction in steel, Bureau of Indian
Standard, New Delhi.
21. NICEE “Earthquake design and construction” IIT Kanpur (www.nicee.org) ”

List of Published Paper
1.A Research paper on “Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Multi-storey Structure with
Composite Column and RCC Column” in International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology(IRJET) Volume:07 Issue:02|Feb2020
2.A Research paper on “The Evaluation of the Composite Column of the Multistory Building by
using the Dynamic Analysis” in International Journal of Research and Analytical
Reviews(IJRAR) Volume:07 Issue:03|July2020
The Board of
International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)
Is hereby awarding this certificate to
Deepankar Sharma
In recognition of the publication of the paper entitled
THE EVALUATION OF THE COMPOSITE COLUMN OF THE MULTISTORY BUILDING BY USING THE
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS.
Published In IJRAR ( www.ijrar.org ) UGC Approved (Journal No : 43602) & 5.75 Impact Factor
Volume 7 Issue 3 , Date of Publication:July 2020 2020-07-22 10:53:54
PAPER ID : IJRAR19L1801 EDITOR IN CHIEF

Registration ID : 223229
UGC and ISSN Approved - International Peer Reviewed Journal, Refereed Journal, Indexed Journal, Impact Factor: 5.75 Google Scholar
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 02 | Feb 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Multi-storey Structure with

Composite Column and RCC Column
Deepankar Sharma1, Sonu Mangla2
1M.Tech, Structural Engineering, VCTM, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh
2Assistant Professor, VCTM, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - In this paper we study about the RCC building in
which the first model is normal RCC building, second model is
composite with the tube section only in column (CFT column)
and third model is composite with I section with rebar in the
column. The main purpose of using three model to check which
one model is more stable at the given time history data. The
analysis is done with the help of the Etabs software by using
the IS Code 1893 part 1 2016. The parameter on which we
analyze the structure is base shear, storey drift, storey
displacement, storey stiffness, overturning moment. We take
the value of the zone factor 0.24 which represent in the zone
four. Time history data is taken from 2009 Andaman Islands
earthquake data in which maximum magnitude is about 7.8 at Fig -1: Composite Section in Structure.
the epicenter. In the all model we assume the frame is RC
building with ordinary moment resisting frame. 2. METHODOLOGY
Key Words: Etabs, Time History, RCC building, Composite Dynamic analysis done in all models by using the “Time
Section, I section, CFT Column. History Data” and data of the earthquake for time history
analysis is taken from Region Andaman and magnitude was
1. INTRODUCTION 7.8. The focus of that earthquake was about 3Km from
ground surface and this type of the earthquake is known as
Now a day we are generally constructing the RCC building the shallow earthquake because the depth of the focus of the
with and without the shear wall to decrease the effect of the earthquake is less than 75Km. The duration of record of the
earthquake in the structure. But in the paper we are making earthquake was about 184.720 Sec. and maximum
the composite structure member in the column to see the acceleration was -6.550 cm/sec2 of that earthquake.
effect of the RCC building. In this paper there are three
models in this paper in which first model is conventional 2.1 Modeling of Structure
RCC building, and in the model second we provide the tube
section of the mild steel which increases the strength of the All models are prepared in the Etabs software which is
column where the tube section is placed in the column. In the developed by CSI company and version of the software was
last model we provide the I section at the middle of the 17 and analysis of the models done with the help of the IS
column and also provide the reinforcement of the 16mm code 1893 part-1 2016. All parameter of the building Such as
diameter with clear cover 40mm, the main purpose of the the material parameter, Section parameter, load parameter,
providing the rebar in the column to make the connection and seismic parameter which are given below:
with beam. The parameter of the RCC building is taken from
IS code 1893 part-1 2016 for the seismic analysis. 2.1.1 Material Parameter
1.1 Composite Structure The parameter of the material which is used in the building
is given below in table-1:-
Composite structure is defined the structure in which that
structure are made up of the two material such as concrete, Table -1: Material Parameter
steel, aluminum, copper etc. The main purpose of the using
the composite structure to study the effect of the using the S.No Material Name Grade
single material and when that material are added with other 1 Concrete M40 for beam & Column
material then what will be effect at that structure. In the 2 Concrete M30 for Slab
Figure-1. it showed the example of the composite of the 3 Mild Steel I section & Tube Section
column in the structure. (Fe250)
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2361
2.1.2 Geometry and Seismic Parameter of the 2.1.5 Plan and 3D view of RCC building (Model-01)
building
The figure of the Model-01 is given below which represent
In this parameter we take the following parameter for the Plan, Elevation and 3D view of the model-1:
RCC building which is shown in the following table-2:-
Table -2: Geometry and Seismic Parameter of building

1 Beam 350mm X 450mm, M40
2 Column 450mm X 550mm, M40
3 Slab 150mm, M30
4 Bottom storey height 3m
5 Height of every floor 3m
6 Total height of building 45m
7 Area of the building 24mX24m Fig -1: Plan and 3D View of Model-01
8 Span of beam 4m
9 Importance Factor (I) 1.2 2.1.6 Plan and 3D view of CFT Column building
10 Response Reduction 3 (Model-02)
Factor (R)
11 Zone Factor (z) 0.24 The cross section of the CFT column in the building (Model-
12 Type of the Soil 2nd 02) is given below in figure and plan, elevation and 3D view
13 Eccentric ratio 0.05 same as RCC building.
14 Magnitude 7.8
15 Time history data Andaman , 10/08/2009
19:55:35 UTC
2.1.3 Load Parameter

In the following table-3, the load value is given which act on
the structure such as dead load, live load and wall load on
the beam:
Table -3: Load Parameter

Fig -2: Cross Section of CFT column of Model-02
1 Dead load 6.9 KN/m 2.1.7 Plan and 3D view of building (Model-03)
2 Live load on Beam 2.5 KN/m
The cross section of the column in the building (Model-03) is
3 Live load 4KN/m2
given below in figure and plan, elevation and 3D view same
as RCC building.
2.1.4 Composite Material Parameter
In the following table which is given below, its shows the
dimension of the composite material which is used in
models, such as representing the dimension of the I section
and dimension of the tube section which is used in the
column to check the stability of all model and which one
represent is play better role in all these three models.
Table -4: Composite Material Parameter
S.No Composite Section Dimension Fig -3: Cross Section of Column of Model-03
1 I section Bf = 125mm, tw = 6.9mm, tf
=6.9mm , D= 250mm 3. ANALYSIS
2 Tube Section Bf = 250mm, D= 250mm, ,
tw = tf = 25mm All models are analyzed with the help of the Etabs software
3 Bar 16mm, 10 with I section by using Dynamic Analysis by defining time History data. We
Steel
had taken the following parameter for comparing all models

with each other:
i. Base Shear.
ii. Storey Drift.
iii. Storey Displacement.
iv. Storey Overturning Moment.
v. Natural Time Period and Frequency.
3.1 Base Shear

The base shear is defined as maximum lateral force act on Chart -2: Storey Drift Due to EX
the each floor due to vibrating the ground surface on which
the structure stabilized. From above graph, we found that value of the storey drift is
maximum in the RCC model as compared to all composite
The graph of the base shear of all models is given below due section models. According to IS code 1893 part-1 2016, the
to earthquake in X direction. The value of the base shear is value of the storey drift should not be exceed than 0.004
same due to earthquake in Y direction because the building height of storey (floor), by using this, all model is safe.
is symmetric.
3.3 Storey Displacement
Storey displacement is defined as measurement of the
displacement of the floor from the ground surface which is
displaced due to effect of the earthquake. The graph of the
storey displacement of all models is given below, which
represent the maximum storey displacement.
Chart -1: Base Shear Due to EX
From the graph we found that value of the base shear is low
in the RCC model as compared to all model so during the
earthquake, the lateral force acts minimum in RCC building
as compared to composite column section.
3.2 Storey Drift Chart -3: Maximum Storey Displacement
Storey drift is defined from clause 4.21 from IS code 1893 From above graph, the value of the storey displacement is
part-1 2016; it is relative displacement between the floor maximum in the RCC model as compared to composite
above or below storey under the consideration. The graph of section and value of the storey displacement is almost same
the storey drift of all models is given below due to in the Model-02 and model-03.
earthquake in X and Y direction (X and Y direction represent
the horizontal directions) the value of the storey drift is 3.4 Storey Stiffness
given at that load combination where the value of the storey
The storey stiffness is defined as the ratio of the storey shear
drift is maximum.
to storey drift.
value of the base shear in RCC is less than 11.21%

as compared to the CFT column in the structure
(Model-02).
ii. The value of the storey drift is found 40.10% more

than as compared to the model-02 and model-03
which is obtained by applied the earthquake force
in x direction. The value of the storey drift due EY is
also same because the number and length of the bay
in X direction is same in Y direction. The value of the
storey drift is safe because it should not exceed than
0.004 height of storey according to the IS code 1893
part-1 2016.
Chart -4: Storey Stiffness Due to EX iii. The value of the storey displacement is maximum in
the RCC building and which is more than 40% as
From the above graph, we found that the value of the storey compared to the Model-02 and 42.25 % as
stiffness is less in the RCC building as compared to the compared to the model-03.
composite column section building.
iv. The value of the natural time period in the RCC
3.5 Natural Time and Frequency building (Model-01) is more as compared to the all
other two models. The value of the natural time
Clause 3.18 from is code 1893 part-2016, the natural time period in model-01 is 20% more as compared to
period it defined as time taken by the structure to complete model-02 and 21.23% more as compared to the
one cycle of the oscillation in its natural mode (k) of model-03.
oscillation. The graph of the natural time periods of all
models is given below with table: REFERENCES
[1] P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance

based seismic design, Earthquake Spect. 16 (3) (August
2000) 573–592.
[2] Ketan Patela, Sonal Thakkarb* ANALYSIS OF CFT, RCC
AND STEEL BUILDING SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADING,
ScienceDirect, 2012, 51 (2013) 259 – 265
[3] Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis, Seismic Analysis of
Steel–Concrete Composite Buildings: Numerical
Modeling.2014, ScienceDirect, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-
36197-5_125-1
[4] Sameh A. El-Betar, Seismic performance of existing R.C.
Chart -5: Natural Time Period framed Buildings.2015, Elsevier
[5] Pramodini Naik1, Satish Annigeri2, Performance
From above graph, the value of the natural time period is Evaluation of (storey RC building located in North Goa.
minimum in model-03 as compared to the model-01 and Science Direct. 2016, Procedia Engineering 173 (2017) 1841
model-02. And there is maximum natural time period in the – 1846
RCC building. The value of the natural time period should be [6] IS: 1893-2016, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of
from 0.05 to 2.0sec. structures, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
[7] IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of
4. CONCLUSIONS Practice, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
[8] IS 800-2007, Code of practice for general construction in
After analyzing the above parameter of the analysis of the all steel, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
models in which first model is RCC building and second
model is CFT column and third model is I section with rebar
in the column. The following conclusion comes out after
analysis:
i. The value of the base shear in the RCC building is

less about 12.42% compared to the model-03 where
in the column, I section provided with rebar. The
© 2020 IJRAR July 2020, Volume 7, Issue 3 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
The Evaluation of the Composite Column of the

Multistory Building by Using the Dynamic Analysis
1
Deepankar Sharma, 2Sonu Mangla
1
M.Tech, Scholar, 2Assistant Professor
1
Civil Engineering Department,
1
VCTM Aligarh, India
Abstract: In this paper, we studied the response of the different composite column in the multistory building by using the dynamic
analysis. In this paper, we created three models which have a different composite column. In the model-01, we provided the normal RCC
column; in the model-02, we provided the column in which tube is provided; in the model-03, we provided the I-section steel with the
reinforcement, where the purpose of the using the reinforcement in the model-03 is that proper joint can be created between the beam and
column. These three models will be analyzed with the help of the Etabs software by using the Indian standard code 1893 part-1:2016. The
method is used for the analysis of these models is Time History Method and data of the time history taken from “Andaman” whose
magnitude was 7.8. After the analysis of these three models, we will compare the result based on the seismic parameter such as Storey
acceleration, Mode shape, Column force, Storey Overturning moment, Base reaction and then we will compare the stability of these three
models with the help of this seismic parameter.
Key Words: Dynamic analysis, time history analysis, CFST column, Composite Section, Etabs
1. INTRODUCTION
At present, the construction of the Multistorey RCC is increasing day by day, due to increasing the height of the structure, the numerical
value of the lateral forces also get increase such as the value of the seismic force and wind force. To resist that lateral force on the
multistory building, we need to design the more stable structure which can easily resist the lateral force.
We know that steel material is used to the tensile force of the structure and nature of the lateral load is in the tensile so we provide the
tube of the steel in the model-02 and I-section with reinforcement in the model-03, which can resist that lateral load.
1.1.CFST Column
Concrete Filled Steeb Tube column is defined as the column in which tube of the steel is placed and no use of the reinforcement bar. The
main advantage of the CFST column is that it can resist the higher lateral force as compared to the reinforcement bar, and drawback of
the CFST column is that we can not provide the proper joint between the beam and column. The figure of the CFST column is given
below:
Figure-1: CFST Column
1.2.Composite Material
The composite material is defined as the combination of the two or more material for one purpose is knows as com[posite material. In this
paper, we used the composite material in the model-02 and model-03. Here Steel and concrete are used in the multistory building for the
resiting load of the structure. The figure of the composite material is given below:
Figure-2: Composite Material
IJRAR19L1801 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) www.ijrar.org 329
2. METHODOLOGY
In the methodology, we studied about the method which is used for the analysis of these models, Indian Standard Code, Software, load
combination, load case, building parameter, seismic parameter, etc.
2.1. Method of the Analysis

In this research paper, we used the dynamic analysis of the CFST column in the multistoried building by using the Time History
Analysis. The dynamic analysis is used when the variation of the lateral force concerning the time is high, or study of the structure in the
moving condition. In the Static Method, we study about the structure when that structure is in the rest or equilibrium condition, or
variation of the lateral force concerning the time is low.
2.2. Software
The software used for creating and analysis of these models is Etabs software, which was developed by the CSI company. Etabs software
is used for the analysis and designing of the structure with the various type of load. In this software, the Standard code is almost uploaded
which used for analyzing the structure by using particular that standard code.
2.3. Indian Standard Code

In this research paper, we used mainly four Indian Standard code such as IS 456:200, IS 875-part-1, IS 875-part-2, and Indian Standard
1893 part-1:2016.
2.3.1. IS Code 456:2000

IS 456-2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice is an Indian Standard code of practice for general structural use of plain
and reinforced concrete. ... It gives extensive information on the various aspects of concrete. Load Combination. In this Indian standard
code, the minimum reinforcement area of the column, beam and slab is given; based on which we check the minimum reinforcement
area.
2.3.2. IS Code 875 part-1

IS 875 (Part 1) Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures. Part 1: Dead Loads--Unit
Weights of Building Materials and Stored Materials. In this Indian standard code, the value of the unit weight of the materials is given.
2.3.3. IS Code 875 part-2

This standard (Part 2) covers imposed loads ( live loads ) to be assumed in the design of buildings. The imposed loads, specified herein,
are minimum loads which should be taken into consideration for the structural safety of buildings. This Indian standard code gives the
value of the live load according to the type of the structure.
2.3.4. IS code 1893:part-1: 2016

This Indian standard code used for the Earthquake Resistant Design of the Structure, in this code, the seismic parameter is given such as
the seismic zone, importance factor, etc; when we analyzed static or dynamic analysis of the structure.
2.4.Load Case
In these three models, we took some load case such as the dead load of the structure, live load on the slab or roof, wall load, and seismic
force.
2.5. Building parameter

In this parameter, we will study about the size of the beam, column, thickness of the slab, plan area of the building, the total height of the
structure, etc. The table of the building parameter is given below:
Table-1: Building Parameter

1 Beam 350mm X 450mm m40
2 Column 440mm X 550mm m40
3 Slab 150mm m30
4 Bottom storey height Bottom storey height
5 Height of every floor Height of every floor
6 The total height of the The total height of the
building building
7 Area of the building Area of the building
8 Span of beam 4m
2.6. Material parameter

The material used in the analysis of these three models such as concrete, reinforcement, etc is given below in the form of the table:
Table-2: Material Parameter
S.No Material Name Grade
1 Concrete M40 for beam & Column
2 Concrete M30 for Slab
3 Mild Steel (Fe250) I section & Tube Section
2.7. Load Parameter

The load which applying on the structure such as dead load or self-weight, live load on the slab or roof, live load on the beam is given
below in the form of the table:
Table-3: Load Parameter
1 Dead load 6.9 KN/m
2 Live load 2.5 KN/m
3 Live load 4KN/m2
2.8. Seismic Parameter

According to the Indian Standard Code, we have taken the value of the seismic parameter based on the location of the structure, type of
frames such as OMRF or SMRF, etc is given below:
Table-4: Seismic Parameter
S.No Seismic Parameter Value
1. Importance Factor (I) 1.2
2. Response Reduction Factor (R) 3
3. Zone Factor (z) 0.24
4. Type of the Soil 2nd
5. Eccentric ratio 0.05
6. magnitude 7.8
7. Time history data Andaman, 10/08/2009 19:55:35
UTC
2.9. Plan, Elevation and 3D view of Model-01

In the model-01, we provided the normal RCC column, the details figure of the model-01 is given below:
Figure-1: Plan, Elevation and 3D View of Model-01

In the model-02, we provided the CFST column means providing the tube of the steel in the column. The plan, elevation and 3D view of
the model-02 are same as model-01, but the cross-section of the column in the model-02 is different from the model-01. The figure of the
cross-section of the column of the model-02 is given below:
Figure-2: Section of tube Column of Model-02
In the model-03, we provided the I-section steel with reinforcement in the column. The plan, elevation and 3D view of the model-03 are
same as model-01, but the cross-section of the column in the model-03 is different from the model-01. The figure of the cross-section of
the column of the model-03 is given below:
Figure-3: Section of Column of Model-03
3. RESULT AND ANALYSIS

In the result and analysis, we will study about the result which comes out after the analysis of three models, and then compare all result of
each model will be compared with other models in the form of the graph. After analyzing all data concerning each other, we will see
which model is more stable and durable as compared to other models. The parameter taken for the analysis of the models is:
i. Design Reaction
ii. Storey Acceleration
iii. Mode Shape
iv. Column Force
v. Storey Overturning Moment
3.1. Design Reaction

Design reaction is defined as the vertical force which is developed at the base of the structure, the design reaction resists all the forces or
load which is acting on these models. The value of the design reaction is taken due to load case EX that is a seismic force in the X-
direction. The graph of the design reaction is given below of these three models along the FZ (vertical load along Z-direction):
Design Reaction (KN)

1800
1600
Design Reaction In FZ (KN)
1400
1200
1000
Model-01 (KN)
800
Model-02 (KN)
600
400 Model-03 (KN)
200
0
-200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910111213141516171819202122232425
Joint Lable
Chart-1: Design Reaction
From the above graph, we can analyze that maximum value of the design reaction at the joint label 06 which is present at the base of the
model.
3.2. Storey Acceleration

Storey acceleration is defined as the acceleration of each storey of the structure due to applying the lateral load on the structure. The
effect of the storey acceleration is high in the case of the lateral load and minimum in the case of the vertical load. The value of the
storey acceleration is taken along the load case EX which applied in the model, and graph of the storey acceleration along UX is given
below:
Storey Acceleration
600
Storey Acceleration (mm/sec*sec)

500
400 Model-01
(mm/sec*sec)
300
Model-02
200 (mm/sec*sec)
100 Model-03
(mm/sec*sec)
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Number of Storey
Chart-2: Storey Acceleration

From the above graph of the storey acceleration, we can analyze that maximum response of the storey acceleration in the model-02.
3.3. Column force

Column force is defined as the vertical force in the compressive nature which come from the above structure to the column. Design the
column to resist that particular load of the column force. The value of the column force due to load case EX, the graph of column force is
given below:
Column Force (KN)

200
0
-200 0 5 10 15 20
Column Force (P)
-400
-600 Model-01 (KN)
-800 Model-02 (KN)
-1000 Model-03 (KN)
-1200
-1400
-1600
Numner og Storey
Chart-3: Column Force

From the above graph of the column forces of the models, the maximum value of the column force in the mode-02, where the tube of the
steel provided in the column.
3.4. Storey Overturning Moment

Storey overturning moment is defined as the moment which acting on every top layer of storey of the structure. The effect of the
overturning moment is maximum due to applying the lateral load on the structure as compared to the vertical load on the structure. The
value of the maximum overturning moment is produced at the base of the structure. The graph of the overturning moment is given below:
Overturning Momemt
4000000
Storey Overturning Moment

3000000
2000000 Model-01 (KN-m)
(KN-m) 1000000 Model-02 (KN-m)

Model-03 (KN-m)
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Number of Storey
Chart-4: Storey Overturning Moment

From the above graph of the storey overturning moment, we can analyze that from storey-01 to storey-02 maximum change occurs.
4. CONCLUSION
i. The value of the storey acceleration of the Model-02 in UX is maximum as compared to the other models, so we can say that
model-02 is more flexible as compared to model-1 and model-3, its because the effect of the lateral force is high in the model-2.
ii. The value of the axial force in the column due to seismic forces in X-direction in the Model-01 is minimum as compared to the
model-02 and model-03. The value of the torsion and moment at the storey-01 is zero so its means that we do not need to the
extra reinforcement in the models at the storey-01. We only need to design the column according to the effect of the load on the
Z-direction.
iii. After comparing the result of the mode shape of the three models, then we find that mode shape of the model-01 at mode-01 is
developed at the 2.058 second, which is maximum as compared to the model-02 and model-03.
iv. Concerning the above graph of the storey overturning moment, the summation of the total overturning moment is in the model-
02 is maximum which is equal to 9750343 KN-m. The value of the storey overturning moment of the model-01 and model-03 is
0.000102% and 0.00002051 % less as compared to the model-02.
v. From the above table of the design reaction, we can see that value of the design reaction of the model-01 is maximum as
compared to model-02 and model-03, so the cost of the constructing the foundation to resist the design reaction is more as
compared to other models, but the model-02 have a low value of the design reaction so it is more economical as compared to
other models.
REFERENCES
[1]P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design, Earthquake Spect. 16 (3) (August 2000) 573–592.
[2]Ketan Patela, Sonal Thakkarb* ANALYSIS OF CFT, RCC AND STEEL BUILDING SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADING,
ScienceDirect, 2012, 51 ( 2013 ) 259 – 265
[3]Konstantinos Daniel Tsavdaridis, Seismic Analysis of Steel–Concrete Composite Buildings: Numerical Modeling.2014,
ScienceDirect, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_125-1
[4]Sameh A. El-Betar, Seismic performance of existing R.C. framed Buildings.2015, Elsevier
[5]Pramodini Naik1, Satish Annigeri2, Performance Evaluation of ( storey RC building located in North Goa. ScienceDirect. 2016,
Procedia Engineering 173 ( 2017 ) 1841 – 1846
[6]IS: 1893-2016, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
[7]IS 456-2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
[8]IS 800-2007, Code of practice for general construction in steel, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
CURRICULUM VITAE
DEEPANKAR SHARMA
Email:- deepankar8052@gmail.com
Contact no:- 8881808883 & 8052683823
Address-F:-639, Barra-8, Kanpur Nagar, UP-208027
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAREER OBJECTIVE:-
I want to secure a position in a company that challenges my skills, updates my current
knowledge and sharpens my training. I want to broaden my horizons and gain a different
perspective so that I can look at the same thing from a variety of angles.
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION:-
Pursuing Master Of Technology in Structural Engineering from Vivekananda

College Of Technology & Management, Aligarh affiliated to Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam
Technical University, Lucknow and approved by AICTE.
ACADEMIC DETAILS:-
Degree School/College Board/University Year Of Aggregate%

Passing
B.Tech. Babu Banarsi Dr A.P.J.Abdul
(Civil Das National Kalam Technical 2015 77.76%
Engineering) Inst.Of Techno. University,
& Management Lucknow
Lucknow
Intermediate Sardar Patel U.P. Board,
Inter College, Allahabad 2010 85%
Kanpur
High School Sardar Patel U.P. Board,
Inter College, Allahabad 2008 69.5%
Kanpur
AREA OF INTEREST:-
➢ Structural analysis
➢ Transportation Engineering
ADDITIONAL ACHEVIMENTS:-
➢ A Research paper on “Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Multi-storey

Structure with Composite Column and RCC Column” in International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology(IRJET) Volume:07
Issue:02|Feb2020
➢ A Research paper on “The Evaluation of the Composite Column of the
Multistory Building by using the Dynamic Analysis” in International
Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews(IJRAR) Volume:07
Issue:03|July2020
TRAINING DETAILS:-
➢ Research Designs & Standard organisation

DURATION: 09 June to 07 July 2014
DESCRIPTION: studied of soil testing in geotechnical lab.
HOBBIES:-
➢ Newspaper reading
➢ Internet surfing
PERSONAL DATA:-
Date of Birth :- 24 January 1993
Father’s name :- Mr. Mahesh Babu Sharma
Sex :- Male
Nationality :- Indian
Marital Status :- Single
Languages Known :- Hindi, English
DECLARATION:-
I hereby declare that the information furnished above is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
DATE:- DEEPANKAR SHARMA

Final Update

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Update

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EVALUATING THE RESPONSE OF

MULTISTORY BUILDING WITH COMPOSITE

Asst.Prof. Mr. SONU MANGLA

Vivekananda College of Technology & Management, Aligarh

Asst.Prof. Mr. SONU MANGLA

Vivekananda College of Technology & Management, Aligarh

“To whomsoever it may concern”

Full Name: Mr. Sonu Mangla

Date- Designation: Assistant Professor

Address: Department of Civil Engineering

Table-3.2: Load Parameter ................................................................................................... 14

Table-3.3: Geometrical Parameter ....................................................................................... 15

Table-3.4: Seismic Parameter .............................................................................................. 15

Table-4.1: Natural Period ..................................................................................................... 23

Table-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX ........................................................................................ 25

Table-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement ......................................................................... 26

Table-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment ............................................................................... 28

Table-4.5: Storey Drift ......................................................................................................... 29

Table-4.6: Storey Stiffness ................................................................................................... 31

Table-4.7: Storey Acceleration Model-01............................................................................ 32

Table-4.8: Storey Acceleration Model-02............................................................................ 34

Table-4.9: Storey Acceleration Model-03............................................................................ 35

Table-4.10: Column Force of Model-01 .............................................................................. 45

Table-4.11: Column Force of Model-02 .............................................................................. 46

Table-4.12: Column Force of Model-03 .............................................................................. 47

Table-4.13: Design Reaction of Model-01........................................................................... 48

Table-4.14: Design Reaction of Model-02........................................................................... 49

Table-4.15: Design Reaction of Model-03........................................................................... 50

Table-4.16: Joint Drift of Model-01..................................................................................... 51

Table-4.17: Joint Drift of Model-02..................................................................................... 53

Table-4.18: Joint Drift of Model-03..................................................................................... 56

Fig-1.1: CFST Column ........................................................................................................... 2

Fig-1.2: Type of CFST Column ............................................................................................. 3

Fig-1.3: Difference between CFST and normal RCC Column .............................................. 3

Fig-1.4: Composite Section .................................................................................................... 4

Fig-3.1: Method of Analysis ................................................................................................. 10

Fig-3.2: Plan of Model-01 .................................................................................................... 16

Fig-3.3: Elevation of Model-01 ............................................................................................ 16

Fig-3.4: 3D View of Model-01 ............................................................................................. 17

Fig-3.5: Cross-section CFT Column of Model-02 ............................................................... 17

Fig-3.6: Plan of Model-02 .................................................................................................... 18

Fig-3.7: Elevation of Model-02 ............................................................................................ 18

Fig-3.8: 3D View of Model-02 ............................................................................................. 19

Fig-3.9: Cross-section of Composite Column of Model-03 ................................................ 19

Fig-3.10: Plan of Model-03 .................................................................................................. 20

Fig-3.11: Elevation of Model-03 .......................................................................................... 20

Fig-3.12: 3-D View of Model-03 ......................................................................................... 21

Fig-4.1: Natural Period ......................................................................................................... 24

Fig-4.2: Base Shear Due to EX ............................................................................................ 25

Fig-4.3: Maximum Storey Displacement ............................................................................. 27

Fig-4.4: Storey Overturning Moment ................................................................................... 28

Fig-4.5: Storey Drift ............................................................................................................. 30

Fig-4.6: Storey Stiffness ....................................................................................................... 31

Fig-4.7: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-01 .................................................................... 37

Fig-4.9: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-10 .................................................................... 38

Fig-4.10: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-15 .................................................................. 38

Fig-4.11: Mode Shape of Model-01 at Mode-20 .................................................................. 39

Fig-4.12: Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-01 .................................................................. 39

Fig-4.13: Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-05 .................................................................. 40

Fig-4.14: Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-10 .................................................................. 40

Fig-4.15: Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-15 .................................................................. 41

Fig-4.16: Mode Shape of Model-02 at Mode-20 .................................................................. 41

Fig-4.17: Mode Shape of Model-03 at Mode-01 .................................................................. 42