Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • PAD13 MoSCoW Prioritization - Standard

    Uploaded by

    Hazqan
    21 views1 page
    The document outlines a project prioritization using MoSCoW methodology. It lists 20 tasks with assigned effort estimates and priorities of Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. 58% of the efforts are allocated to Must Have tasks, 13% to Should Have, 22% to Could Have, and 7% to Won't Have. The allocation of efforts to the different priority levels is generally aligned with the intended balancing criteria of 60% for Must Have, 15% for Should Have, 20% for Could Have, and 10% for Won't Have.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines a project prioritization using MoSCoW methodology. It lists 20 tasks with assigned effort estimates and priorities of Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. 58% of the efforts are allocated to Must Have tasks, 13% to Should Have, 22% to Could Have, and 7% to Won't Have. The allocation of efforts to the different priority levels is generally aligned with the intended balancing criteria of 60% for Must Have, 15% for Should Have, 20% for Could Have, and 10% for Won't Have.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    21 views1 page

    PAD13 MoSCoW Prioritization - Standard

    Uploaded by

    Hazqan
    The document outlines a project prioritization using MoSCoW methodology. It lists 20 tasks with assigned effort estimates and priorities of Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. 58% of the efforts are allocated to Must Have tasks, 13% to Should Have, 22% to Could Have, and 7% to Won't Have. The allocation of efforts to the different priority levels is generally aligned with the intended balancing criteria of 60% for Must Have, 15% for Should Have, 20% for Could Have, and 10% for Won't Have.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    MoSCoW Prioritization ANALYSISTABS

    Company Name DOCUMENT CONTROL PROJECT DETAILS

    A: Street, Address Line 1 Created On: 1-Jan-20 Project Number: #123456


    E: contact@company.com Last Updated On: 15-Jan-20 Project Name: Title of the Project
    T: +1 23456 789 Reviewd On: 15-Jan-20 Manager Name: Name of the Project Manager

    Task Efforts Priority


    Balancing Criteria Efforts
    Task Title 1 30 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 2 20 (S)hould Have

    Task Title 3 20 (C)ould Have

    Task Title 4 80 (W)on't Have


    (M)ust Have (11) 58% 60%
    Task Title 5 40 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 6 70 (S)hould Have

    Task Title 7 30 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 8 80 (C)ould Have (S)hould Have (3) 13% 15%


    Task Title 9 70 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 10 100 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 11 50 (C)ould Have

    Task Title 12 60 (S)hould Have

    Task Title 13 40 (C)ould Have


    (C)ould Have (5) 22% 20%
    Task Title 14 80 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 15 90 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 16 40 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 17 30 (M)ust Have (W)on't Have (1) 7% 10%


    Task Title 18 80 (M)ust Have

    Task Title 19 80 (M)ust Have


    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
    Task Title 20 60 (C)ould Have

    * Contact@company.com ( 123456789 H www.yourcompany.com

    You might also like