Aer 98 4 1707

American Economic Review 2008, 98:4, 1707–1721
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.98.4.1707
Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins

of International Trade
By Thomas Chaney*
By considering a model with identical firms, Paul Krugman (1980) predicts that a higher elas-
ticity of substitution between goods magnifies the impact of trade barriers on trade flows. In this
paper, I introduce firm heterogeneity in a simple model of international trade. When the distribu-
tion of productivity across firms is Pareto, which is close to the observed size distribution of US
firms, the predictions of the Krugman model with representative firms are overturned: the impact
of trade barriers on trade flows is dampened by the elasticity of substitution, and not magnified.
In Krugman (1980), identical countries trade differentiated goods despite the presence of trade
barriers because consumers have a preference for variety. If goods are less substitutable, con-
sumers are willing to buy foreign varieties even at a higher cost, and trade barriers have little
impact on bilateral trade flows. Total exports from country A to country B are given by the fol-
lowing expression:
GDPA 3 GDPB
ExportsAB 5 Constant 3 s ,
1Trade barriersAB2
where s is the elasticity of substitution between varieties. A crucial assumption in this model is
that all firms are identical, and that the only form of transportation cost is a variable cost. Under
these assumptions, every firm exports to every country in the world. Trade barriers have a strong
impact on trade flows when the elasticity of substitution between goods is high. Competition is
fierce when the elasticity of substitution is high, and any cost disadvantage translates into large
losses of market share.
In this paper, I add firm heterogeneity in productivity, as well as fixed costs of exporting.
These simple amendments introduce a new margin of adjustment: the extensive margin. When
transportation costs vary, not only does each exporter change the size of its exports (the intensive
margin), but the set of exporters varies as well (the extensive margin). The main finding of this
paper is that the elasticity of substitution has opposite effects on each margin. A higher elastic-
ity makes the intensive margin more sensitive to changes in trade barriers, whereas it makes the
extensive margin less sensitive. The reason is the following. When trade barriers decrease, new
and less productive firms enter the export market. When the elasticity of substitution is high, a
low productivity is a severe disadvantage. These less productive firms can capture only a small
market share. The impact of those new entrants on aggregate trade is small. On the other hand,
when the elasticity is low, each firm is sheltered from competition. The new entrants capture a
* Chaney: Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 (e-mail:
tchaney@uchicago.edu). I am grateful to Xavier Gabaix, Marc Melitz, and Daron Acemoglu for their encourage-
ment and advice. I also thank the editor, three anonymous referees, and Richard Rogerson for their comments. For
their suggestions and comments, I also wish to thank Sylvain Chassang, Sam Kortum, David Sraer, and participants
at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Boston College, Boston University, Columbia University, University of
Chicago, Chicago GSB, Harvard University, INSEAD, LSE, MIT, the New York Fed, New York University, University
of Pennsylvania, University of California–Berkeley, University of California–San Diego, University of Wisconsin–
Madison, the World Bank, and on the REStud Tour 2005. All remaining errors are mine.
1707
1708 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW September 2008
large market share. The impact of those new entrants on aggregate trade is large. So a higher
elasticity of substitution magnifies the sensitivity of the intensive margin to changes in trade bar-
riers, whereas it dampens the sensitivity of the extensive margin.
Which effect dominates? I prove that when the distribution of productivity across firms is
Pareto, which is a good approximation of the observed distribution of US firms, the effect on
the extensive margin dominates. My augmented model predicts that total exports from country
A to country B are given by the following expression:
GDPA 3 GDPB
ExportsAB 5 Constant 3 with e91s2 , 0.
1Trade barriersAB2 e 1s2
The elasticity of aggregate trade with respect to trade barriers (both variable and fixed), e, is
negatively related to the elasticity of substitution, s. Variable trade barriers enter the gravity
equation with an exponent that depends only on the distribution of productivity and not on the
elasticity of substitution, and fixed trade barriers with an exponent that is inversely related to the
elasticity of substitution.
The model with heterogeneous firms also predicts that the same trade barriers will have a
larger impact on trade flows than in the model with representative firms. When trade barriers
decrease, each firm exports more. In addition, new firms start exporting. This adjustment on the
extensive margin is quantitatively important. Given the observed distribution of firm size in the
United States, I predict that the elasticity of trade flows with respect to variable trade barriers
such as tariffs is twice as large as it would be in the absence of firm heterogeneity.
The prediction, that the effect of trade barriers on trade flows is magnified by the elasticity of
substitution, is not specific to Krugman’s model of trade. Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff
(2001), for example, explain the six major puzzles in International Macroeconomics by the exis-
tence of trade barriers. The simple model they spell out to illustrate how plausible values for
trade barriers can have a large impact on trade flows relies on the magnification by the elasticity
of substitution. James E. Anderson (1979) presents a theoretical foundation for the gravity equa-
tion based on the Armington assumption of competitive trade in goods differentiated by country
of origin. In both models, a higher elasticity of substitution will magnify the effect of trade bar-
riers on trade flows, even in the absence of increasing returns or monopolistic competition.
The main contribution of this paper is to introduce the extensive margin of trade in a simple and
tractable model with multiple countries and asymmetric trade barriers. The elasticity of aggregate
trade flows with respect to trade barriers is larger than what traditional models would predict. It is
not equal to the elasticity of substitution; it is inversely related to the elasticity of substitution.
In the remainder of this section, I review previous work related to this model, and existing
empirical evidence that supports the predictions of this model.
Marc Melitz (2003) introduces firm heterogeneity in a general equilibrium model of interna-
tional trade. I expand Melitz’s model in the following way. I consider a world with many asym-
metric countries, separated by asymmetric trade barriers. I then study the strategic choice of
firms to export or not, and if they export, which countries to target. I embed my model in a global
equilibrium. Such a model generates predictions for the structure of bilateral trade flows. I can
pin down which firm from which country is able to enter a given market, and how it is affected
by competition from local and other foreign firms, even in the presence of asymmetric bilateral
trade barriers. The presence of fixed costs associated with entering foreign markets provides a
simple foundation for the extensive margin of trade.

See Erzo G. J. Luttmer (2007) for the most recent evidence, and this introduction for further references.
VOL. 98 NO. 4 chaney: Distorted Gravity 1709
Elhanan Helpman, Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein (forthcoming) develop a similar extension to
the Melitz model with multiple countries. Using bounded support for the productivity shocks,
they can make use of the information contained in the zeros of the trade matrices and improve
on the traditional gravity regressions. They do not, however, generate analytical solutions for the
extensive margin of trade. This gives them more flexibility in estimating empirically the prob-
ability that exporters enter a given foreign market. But it prevents them from deriving precise
predictions for the role of variable and fixed costs in explaining both the intensive and the exten-
sive margins of international trade.
Kim J. Ruhl (2005) builds a dynamic version of the Melitz model to explain the so-called
elasticity puzzle. He argues that in response to high frequency transitory shocks, most of the
adjustments of exports happen at the intensive margin, whereas in response to permanent shocks
such as trade liberalization, both the intensive and the extensive margins adjust. I abstract from
any dynamic considerations and build a model of the steady-state trade flows between many
countries. Costas Arkolakis (2007) offers an extension to the current model to explain the exis-
tence of small exporters, even in the presence of fixed trade barriers. He proposes that firms can
decide what fraction of a market they want to access, where the fixed entry cost increases with
the number of consumers reached.
Jonathan Eaton, Sam Kortum, and Francis Kramarz (2007) find that the current model pro-
vides a good description of firm-level trade using data on French exporters. Among others, the
current model predicts correctly many of the patterns of entry of heterogeneous firms into dif-
ferent markets, and the relationship between the size of a firm on its domestic market, and the
number of foreign markets it enters. The assumption that productivity shocks are Pareto distrib-
uted provides a good fit for the firm-level data: it describes precisely the distribution of firm size
within France, as well as which foreign markets a given firm enters.
There is wide empirical evidence that the Pareto distribution is a good approximation of the
upper tail of the distribution of firm sizes. Since exporters are overwhelmingly large firms, and
therefore in the upper tail of the size distribution, this distribution is a good candidate for a
theoretical model of firm selection into export markets. Herbert A. Simon and Charles P. Bonini
(1958) first noted that the size distribution of firm sizes is well described by a Pareto distribu-
tion. Recent evidence on this empirical regularity for the United States include Robert L. Axtell
(2001) and Luttmer (2007). Xavier Gabaix (2008) provides a survey on the prevalence of “power
law” distributions for firms in the United States and in Europe. Helpman, Melitz, and Stephen
Yeaple (2004) estimate a Pareto distribution for both US and European firms to predict foreign
direct investment in different sectors.
The closest evidence in support of the predictions of the current model are James E. Rauch
(1999), Martin Andersson (2007), Matthieu Crozet and Pamina Koenig (2007), and Koenig
(2005). Rauch finds that trade barriers have a milder impact on trade volumes for goods that
are more homogenous. He defines homogenous goods as goods that are traded on organized
exchanges, or goods that have a reference price. He argues that acquiring information about
differentiated goods is costly, so that effectively differentiated goods face a higher trade barrier.
This reasoning can, however, explain why there should be more trade in homogenous goods, but
not why given trade barriers should have a bigger impact. The current model offers an alternative
explanation for the interaction between product differentiation and trade barriers. I spell out a
clear theoretical channel through which product differentiation affects trade barriers. Andersson
(2007) uses firm-level export data on Swedish firms. He separates out the impact of variable
trade barriers and the impact of fixed trade barriers (proxied by measures of “familiarity” of
markets), and separates out their impact on the intensive and extensive margins of trade. First,
he finds that fixed costs have a larger impact on the extensive margin than on the intensive
margin of trade. Moreover, the impact of fixed trade barriers on the extensive margin is larger
for differentiated goods than for homogenous goods. Crozet and Koenig (2007) use firm-level
export data on French firms to structurally estimate the current model. The panel dimension
of the data allows them to separate out the distance elasticity of trade costs from the elasticity
of exports with respect to trade barriers. Koenig (2005) uses the same firm-level export data
on French firms. As the current model predicts, she finds that the distance elasticity of indi-
vidual firm exports (the intensive margin) is larger in sectors where goods are more homogenous,
whereas the distance elasticity of the number of firms (the extensive margin) is smaller in sectors
where goods are more homogenous. In addition, she finds that the share of exports explained by
the extensive margin is larger in sectors with more differentiated goods. At the aggregate level,
unlike the predictions of this model, she finds that in sectors with homogenous goods, the dis-
tance elasticity of total exports is mildly larger than in sectors with differentiated goods, but this
difference is not significant.
Finally, several authors have stressed the quantitative importance of the extensive margin in
explaining aggregate trade flows. David Hummels and Peter J. Klenow (2005) find that larger
and wealthier countries trade more, and that 60 percent of the difference in aggregate trade flows
comes from differences in the number of goods traded. Along a slightly different line, Kei-Mu Yi
(2003) argues that the increase in trade in intermediate goods, which amounts to trade in more
goods, can help explain the observed increase in international trade in the last decades. All find
a strong response of the extensive margin to changes in trade barriers or country size that are
consistent with the current model.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section I introduces a simple model of
international trade with heterogeneous firms and derives partial equilibrium results. In Section II,
I compute the general equilibrium of the world economy. Finally, Section III identifies separately
the adjustments of the intensive and the extensive margins of trade, in response to changes in
both variable and fixed trade barriers.
I. Setup
In this section, I introduce the basic ingredients of the model. I define preferences and
technologies, and I characterize the optimal strategies of both firms and consumers in partial
equilibrium.
There are N potentially asymmetric countries that produce goods using only labor. Country n
has a population Ln. Consumers in each country maximize utility derived from the consumption
of goods from H 1 1 sectors. Sector 0 provides a single homogenous good. The other H sectors
are made of a continuum of differentiated goods. If a consumer consumes qo units of good 0, and
qh 1v 2 units of each variety v of good h, for all varieties in the set V h (determined in equilibrium),
she gets a utility U,
q q3 qh 1v 2
H 3sh / 1sh212 4 mh
1sh212/sh
(1) U; qom0 dvr ,
h51 Vh
where m0 1 g h51 mh 5 1, and where sh . 1 is the elasticity of substitution between two varieties
H
of good h. I assume that H . 1 so that I can compare sectors characterized by different degrees
of product substitutability.

The impact of distance is also larger, which suggests that distance proxies for both variable and some fixed costs.

It is empirically more relevant to compare sectors with different degrees of product substitutability than to com-
pare different economies.
Trade Barriers and Technology.—The homogenous good 0 is freely traded and is used as
the numeraire. It is produced under constant returns to scale with one unit of labor in country n
producing wn units of good 0. Its price is set equal to 1 so that if country n produces this good,
the wage in country n is wn. I shall consider only equilibria where every country produces some
of the numeraire. This assumption greatly simplifies the analysis. It allows countries to differ
both in size 1Ln 2 and in productivity 1wn 2. There are two types of trade barriers, a variable and
a fixed cost. The variable cost takes the form of an “iceberg” transportation cost. If one unit of
any differentiated good h is shipped from country i to country j, only a fraction 1/t hij arrives. The
rest melts on the way. The higher t, the higher the variable trade cost. In addition, if a firm from
country i in sector h exports to country j, it must pay a fixed cost fijh, in units of the numeraire.
All countries have access to the same technology. Due to the presence of fixed costs, firms
in the differentiated sectors operate under increasing returns-to-scale technology. Each firm in
sector h draws a random unit labor productivity w. The cost of producing q units of a good and
selling them in country j for a firm with productivity w is
w ithij
(2) cijh 1q 2 5 q 1 fijh.
w
Firms are price setters. Given that demand functions are isoelastic, the optimal price charged in
country j by firm w from country i is a constant mark-up over the unit cost (including transporta-
tion costs): pijh 1w 2 5 sh / 1sh 2 12 3 wi t hij /w.
As in Helpman, Melitz, and Yeaple (2004), I assume that productivity shocks are drawn from a
Pareto distribution with shape parameter gh : productivity is distributed over 31, 1 `2 according to
(3) P 1w̃h , w 2 5 Gh 1w 2 5 1 2 w2gh,
with gh . sh 2 1. An inverse measure of the heterogeneity in sector h is given by gh. Sectors with
a high g are more homogenous, in the sense that more output is concentrated among the smallest
and least productive firms. The assumption that productivity shocks are Pareto distributed is
made first for analytical tractability, and second because it provides a good approximation of the
distribution of firm sizes in the United States.
I assume that the total mass of potential entrants in country n in each differentiated sector is
proportional to wn Ln , so that larger and wealthier countries have more entrants. This assumption
greatly simplifies the analysis. It is similar to Eaton and Kortum (2002), where the set of goods
is exogenously given. Since I do not impose free entry, firms generate net profits that have to be
redistributed. I assume that each worker owns wn shares of a global fund. The fund collects prof-
its from all firms and redistributes them in units of the numeraire good to its shareholders.
Demand for Differentiated Goods.—The total income spent by workers in country j, Yj , is

the sum of their labor income 1wj Lj 2 and of the dividends they get from their portfolio 1wj Lj p2 ,
where p is the dividend per share of the global mutual fund. Given the optimal pricing of firms,

As long as the share of the homogenous good, m 0 , is large enough, or trade barriers in the other sectors are large
enough, this condition will hold.
h
t ij . 1 for any i Z j and t hii 5 1. I also impose a triangular inequality to prevent transportation arbitrages: 5 1i, j, k 2 ,
tik # tij 3 tjk.

ln w has a standard deviation equal to 1/g. The assumption g . s 2 1 ensures that, in equilibrium, the size distri-
bution of firms has a finite mean.

See Luttmer (2002) for the most recent evidence.
and the demand by consumers, exports from country i to country j in sector h, by a firm with a
labor productivity w, are
phij 1 w 2 1 2 sh
(4) x hij 1w 2 5 phij 1w 2 q hij 1w 2 5 mhYj a h b ,
Pj
where P hj is the ideal price index for good h in country j. If only those firms above the productiv-
ity threshold w–h in country k and sector h export to country j, the ideal price index for good h in
kj
country j, Pj, and dividends per share, p, are defined as
P hj 5 q a wk Lk 3
sh w k tkj 1 2 sh
N ` h 1/ 11 2 sh 2
(5) a b dGh 1w 2r ;
k 51 wkjh sh 2 1 w
a a w k L k a 3 h pkl 1 w 2 dGh 1 w 2 b
H N `
h
h51 k, l51 wkl

(6) ,
a w nL n
p5 N
n51
where phkl 1w 2 5 1 p hkl 1w 2 2 c hkl 1w 2 2 q hkl 1w 2 2 f klh are the net profits that a firm with productivity w
in country k and sector h earns from exporting to country l.
For now, I will consider only sector h. The other sectors are analogous. For notational clarity,
I drop the h subscript and all sectoral variables will refer to sector h when there is no ambiguity.
II. Trade with Heterogeneous Firms
In this section, I compute the global equilibrium of this world economy. To do so, I solve for
the selection of firms into different export markets. I generate predictions for aggregate bilateral
trade flows.
A firm chooses a subset of countries where it sells its output, and sets prices for its good in
each market, taking the strategies of other firms and of consumers as given. Consumers chose
the quantity consumed of each variety available domestically, given prices. All agents move
simultaneously, and an equilibrium is a fixed point to their strategies. Firms decide whether to
enter a given market depending on how much competition they expect to face in that market.
The toughness of competition in turn depends on which firms enter. I derive the solution to this
selection problem, which turns out to be quite tractable.
Productivity Threshold.—Less productive firms are not able to generate enough profits abroad
to cover the fixed cost of entering foreign markets. Exporters are therefore only a subset of
domestic firms. This subset varies with the characteristics of the foreign market. The profits firm
w earns when exporting from i to j are pij 1w 2 5 m/s Yj 3s/ 1s 2 12 1wi tij /w 2 / Pj 4 12s 2 fij. Define
the threshold w– from p 1w – 2 5 0 as the productivity of the least productive firm in country i
ij ij ij
able to export to country j:
f ij 1/ 1s212 w itij
(7) – 5l a
w b ,
Yj Pj
ij 1
– . 1.
with l1 a constant. I assume that trade barriers are always high enough so that 5k, l, wkl

l1 5 1s/m 2 1/ 1s212 1s/ 1s212 2 .
Equilibrium Price Indices.—Until now, I have considered aggregate prices as given. They
do adjust, however, depending on country characteristics. Thanks to two simplifying assump-
tions—wages are exogenously pinned down in the homogenous sector, and the number of poten-
tial entrants (not the number of actual entrants) is exogenously given—the set of firms that export
to country j depends only on country j’s characteristics. Plugging the productivity thresholds
from equation (7) into the price index from equation (5), I can solve for the equilibrium price
index:
(8) Pj 5 l2 3 Yj1/g21/ 1s212 3 uj,
where uj2g ; g k 51 1Yk / Y 2 3 1wk tkj 2 2g 3 f kj2 3g/ 1s212214 , Y is world output, and l2 is a constant.
N
An aggregate index of j’s remoteness from the rest of the world is given by uj.10 It is reminis-
cent of the “multilateral resistance variable” introduced by Anderson and Eric Van Wincoop
(2003). In addition to their measure, it takes into account the impact of fixed costs and of firm
heterogeneity on aggregate prices.
Equilibrium Exports, Thresholds, and Profits.—Exports by an individual firm depend on its

productivity, the trade barriers it must overcome, aggregate demand, the set of competitors it is
facing, and the price they set. Plugging the general equilibrium price index from equation (8) into
the demand function, and into the productivity threshold from equation (7), I can solve simulta-
neously for firm level exports the productivity thresholds and total world profits. In general equi-
librium, exports xij 1w 2 from country i to country j by an individual firm with productivity w, the
productivity threshold w – above which firms in i export to j, aggregate output Y , and dividends
ij j
per share p, are given by
Y j 1s212 / g u j s21
(9) x 1w 2 5 • l3 3 a b 3a b –
3 ws21, if w $ w
ij Y w itij ij
0 otherwise,
w itij
– 5 l 3 aY b
1/g
µ wij 4
Yj
3a
uj
b 3 fij1/ 1s212 ,
Yi 5 11 1 l52 3 wi Li,
p 5 l5,
g 2 1 s 2 1 2 s g/ 1s21221

s g
11p
lg2 5 a ba b a b a b.
g m s21 Y
Note that there is a slight abuse of notations, as dividends per share 1p2 and world output (Y) will be endogenously
determined in equilibrium. However, firms as well as consumers take total world profits and output as a constant. I will
solve for 1p, Y2 in equilibrium.
10
A simple way to interpret this aggregate index is to look at a symmetrical case: when wk tkj 5 wtj and f kj 5 fj for
all k’s, uj 5 fj1/ 1s212 2 1/g 3 wtj. In asymmetric cases, uj is a weighted average of bilateral trade barriers.
with l3, l4, and l5 as constants.11 Equilibrium variables are functions of fundamentals only: the
size Lj ,12 the productivity wi, the trade barriers fij and tij, and the measure of j ’s remoteness from
the rest of the world, uj.
As expected from this simple monopolistic competition model, exports by individual firms
depend on the transportation cost tij with an elasticity s 2 1. Firm-level trade is very similar to
what a traditional model of trade with representative firms would predict for aggregate bilateral
trade flows. In contrast, because of the selection of firms into the export market, aggregate bilat-
eral trade in the present model will look radically different.
Proposition 1 (Aggregate Trade): Total exports (f.o.b.) X hij in sector h from country i to
country j are given by
Yi 3 Yj w ithij 2gh
(10) Xhij 5 mh 3 3a b 3 1 fijh 2 2 3gh / 1sh212214 .
Y u hj
Exports are a function of country sizes 1Yi and Yj 2 ,13 workers’ productivity 1wi 2 , the bilateral
trade costs, variable 1t hij 2 and fixed 1 fijh 2 , and the measure of j’s remoteness from the rest of the
world 1uhj 2.14
Proof:
See the Appendix.
The gravity structure of trade has been dramatically distorted by the presence of firm
heterogeneity.
First note that the elasticity of exports with respect to variable trade barriers, g, is larger than
in the absence of firm heterogeneity, and larger than the elasticity for each individual firm (both
equal to s 2 1). A reduction in variable costs not only causes an increase in the size of exports
of each exporter, but also allows some new firms to enter. The extensive margin comes on top of
the intensive margin and amplifies the impact of variable costs. This amplification effect is quan-
titatively important. Anderson and Van Wincoop (2004) argue that if one assumes that trade is
governed by an underlying model of trade with identical firms, trade barriers between the United
States and Canada must be equivalent to a 46 percent tariff in order to explain the observed
bilateral trade flows (for a benchmark case with s 5 8). In the presence of firm heterogeneity,
11
l3 5 sl412s, l4 5 3s/m 3 g/ 3g 2 1s 2 12 4 3 1/ 11 1 l 52 4 1/g, and
aa
Hs h 2 1 mh
b
h51 gh sh
l5 5 .
12 aa
H s h 2 1 mh
b
h51 gh sh
I am grateful to Sebastian Krautheim for helpful suggestions on computing aggregate profits.
12
The elasticity of individual firms’ exports with respect to the destination market Yj is less than one. This is due to
the impact of market size on the degree of price competition: as the size of the market grows, more firms enter, which
eat up part of the market shares of existing exporters.
13
GDP is proportional to labor income: Yi 5 11 1 l 52 wi Li.
14
Note that the ratio of i’s market share in k, and j ’s market share in k, depends only on the ratio of i’s trade barri-
ers and j ’s trade barriers. If I define the composite measure of trade barriers kik 5 1wi tik 2 2g 3 f ik2 3g2 1s212 4 / 1s212 , I get:
from other countries: Xik / Xk 5 3 1Li / L2 kik / gj 1Lj / L2 kjk 4 .

1Xik / Yi 2 / 1Xjk /Yj 2 5 kik /kjk . Similarly, i ’s market share in k depends only on trade barriers from i relative to trade barriers
and using a heterogeneity parameter estimated from firm-level data 1g/1s 2 12 < 22 ,15 I would
infer from the same trade volume data that trade barriers are equivalent to a 21 percent tariff
11.21 5 !1.462.16 This is far below their 46 percent estimate.
Second, the elasticity of exports with respect to transportation costs depends on the degree of
firm heterogeneity, g. In more homogenous sectors 1g high2 , large productive firms represent a
smaller fraction of firms. The productivity threshold moves in a region where most of the mass
of firms lies. In those sectors, aggregate exports are sensitive to changes in transportation costs
because many firms exit and enter when variable costs fluctuate.
Third and most important, the elasticity of exports with respect to variable costs does not
depend at all on the elasticity of substitution between goods, s,17 and the elasticity of exports
with respect to fixed costs is negatively related to the elasticity s. This prediction is in stark con-
trast with models with representative firms. In such models, the elasticity of exports with respect
to transportation costs would be equal to s 2 1.
III. Intensive versus Extensive Margins of Trade
In this section, I describe how the elasticity of substitution magnifies the sensitivity of the
intensive margin to trade barriers and dampens the sensitivity of the extensive margin. I prove
that the dampening effect on the extensive margin dominates the magnifying effect on the inten-
sive margin.
Thus far, I have shown that in the presence of firm heterogeneity, the selection of firms into the
export market becomes a key feature of the adjustment of trade flows. The main prediction of the
model is that the extensive margin and the intensive margin are affected in opposite directions by
the elasticity of substitution. If the elasticity of substitution is high, then the impact of trade bar-
riers is strong on the intensive margin and mild on the extensive margin. The reverse holds true
when the elasticity of substitution is low. The dampening effect of the elasticity of substitution on
the extensive margin dominates the magnifying effect on the intensive margin.
Proposition 2 (Intensive and Extensive Margins): The elasticity of substitution 1s2 has no
effect on the elasticity of trade flows with respect to variable trade costs 1z2 , and a negative
effect on the elasticity of trade flows with respect to fixed costs 1j2:
d ln X ij d ln X ij 'z 'z
if z ; 2 and j ; 2 , then 5 0 and , 0.
d ln tij d ln f ij 's 's
15
I measure g/ 1s 2 12 as the regression coefficient of the log of rank (ordering US firms according to their sales in
the United States) on the log of sales, using Compustat data on US listed firms. With an alternative method using the
propensity of French firms to export to multiple markets, Eaton, Kortum, and Kramarz (2007) find a smaller number,
g/ 1s 2 12 < 1.5.
16
To make the two models comparable, despite the presence of fixed entry costs, I assume the entry cost into any
Canadian province is the same for US and Canadian firms.
17
Eaton and Kortum (2002) derive a similar prediction from a different setup. In a Ricardian model of trade, they
find that bilateral trade flows do not depend on the elasticity of substitution between goods, but only on the scaling
parameter of the underlying distribution of productivity shocks. They use Fréchet distributions, which approach Pareto
2u
distributions in their right tails: the distribution for shocks they consider is 1 2 F 1z2 5 1 2 e2Tz 5 Tz2u 1 o 1z2u 2 .
z S 1`
In equilibrium, they predict that the elasticity of trade flows with respect to trade barriers (variable only) is equal to u.
Proof:
To prove this proposition, I introduce formally the intensive and the extensive margins of
trade. I describe the adjustment of each margin, and the sensitivity of these adjustments to the
elasticity of substitution.
The impact of trade barriers, both variable and fixed, on aggregate trade flows can be decom-
posed into two different margins. The intensive margin is defined by how much each existing
exporter changes the size of its exports. The extensive margin is defined by how much new
entrants export (in the case of a reduction in trade barriers).
Differentiating the expression for aggregate exports, Xij 5 wi Li ewij xij 1w 2 dG 1w 2 , I get the fol-
`
lowing expressions for each margin: 18
dXij 5 awi Li 3
`
'x ij 1 w 2 'wij
–ij 2 G9 1w
dG 1w 2 b dtij 2 awi Li x 1w –ij 2 3 b dtij
wij 'tij 'tij
1 awi Li 3
`
'x ij 1 w 2 'wij
–ij 2 G9 1w
dG 1w 2 b d fij 2 awi Li x 1w
b d fij . –ij 2 3
'f ij wij 'f ij
8 8
Intensive margin Extensive margin
Following a reduction of trade barriers, each existing exporter 1w . w–ij 2 exports more. This is the
intensive margin. At the same time, higher potential profits attract new entrants 1w –ij goes down2.
This is the extensive margin.
In elasticity notations, I get the following expression for each margin for changes in the vari-
able cost, tij:19
d ln X ij
z;2 5 1s 2 12 1 1g 2 1s 2 12 2 5 g .
d ln tij 3 3
Elasticity Elasticity
When variable costs move 1s 2 1 increases with s2 , s magnifies the intensive margin, whereas
it dampens the extensive margin 1g 2 1s 2 12 decreases with s2.20 The effect of s on each mar-
gin cancels out, so that
'z
5 0.
's
18
I use Leibniz rule to separate the intensive from the extensive margin. I apply Lebesgue’s monotone convergence
theorem to ensure the existence of, and to compute, the intensive margin.
19
See the Appendix for a complete derivation.
20
I have implicitly assumed that changes in both tij and f ij have no significant impact on the general equilibrium.
That is, I have assumed that 0uj /0tij 5 0uj /0 f ij 5 0. This is a fair approximation as long as country i is not too large
compared to the rest of the world 1Yi / Y small). Relaxing this assumption would reinforce my results, but it would make
calculations cumbersome. See the Technical Appendix (available at http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/
aer.98.4.1707 for a derivation of the general case.
In elasticity notation, I get the following expression for each margin for changes in the fixed
costs, fij:
d ln X ij g g
j;2 5 0 1 21 5 2 1.
d ln f ij 3 s21
3 s21
Elasticity Elasticity
When only fixed costs move, s has no impact on the intensive margin, whereas it dampens the
impact on the extensive margin 1g / 1s 2 12 2 1 decreases with s2. The impact of s on the elas-
ticity of trade flows with respect to fixed costs is always negative:
'j
, 0.
's
The intuition for these results is the following. When goods are highly differentiated 1s is
low2 , the demand for each individual variety is relatively insensitive to changes in trade costs.
In other words, when s is low, trade barriers have little impact on the intensive margin of trade.
This margin is the only one in the Krugman model of trade with representative firms.
The interaction between the elasticity of substitution and the extensive margin is more com-
plex. When s is low, the market share that each firm is able to capture is relatively insensitive to
differences in productivity. Less productive firms are still able to capture a relatively large mar-
ket share, despite having to charge a higher price than other firms. As trade barriers decrease,
some firms with a low level of productivity are able to enter. When goods are highly differenti-
ated 1s is low2 , these new entrants are relatively large compared to the firms that are already
exporting. Therefore, the extensive margin is strongly affected by trade barriers when s is low.
The reverse holds when s is high.
In this section, I have explained why the elasticity of substitution has opposite effects on the
intensive and the extensive margins of trade. A higher elasticity of substitution makes the inten-
sive margin more sensitive to changes in trade barriers, whereas it makes the extensive margin
less sensitive. What is the net impact of s on the two margins? I prove in Proposition 2 that with
Pareto distributed productivity shocks, the extensive margin always dominates. Contrary to the
predictions of the Krugman model with representative firms, the elasticity of substitution s
always dampens the impact of trade barriers on trade flows.
IV. Conclusion
Introducing firm heterogeneity leaves many of the predictions of the Krugman (1980) model
of international trade unaffected. Most important, the gravity structure of bilateral trade flows
is preserved. In this paper, I have identified a key difference between the Krugman model with
representative firms and a model with firm heterogeneity. The impact of trade barriers is damp-
ened by the elasticity of substitution, and not magnified by it. I introduce fixed export costs and
adjustments on the extensive margin in a simple model of international trade. A high elasticity
of substitution translates productivity differences into large differences in size. As firm sizes
get more dispersed, fixed costs have a lesser impact on exports: large firms can easily overcome
those fixed costs. Aggregate trade flows are less sensitive to trade barriers when goods are more
substitutable.
Appendix
Proposition 1 (Reminded): Total exports (f.o.b.) X hij in sector h from country i to country j
are given by
Yi 3 Yj w ithij 2gh
X hij 5 mh 3 3a b 3 1 f hij 2 2 1gh / 1sh212212 .
Y u hj
Exports are a function of country sizes 1Yi and Yj 2 , workers’ productivity 1wi 2 , the bilateral
trade costs, variable 1t hij 2 and fixed 1 f hij 2 , and the measure of j’s remoteness from the rest of the
world 1uhj 2.
Proof:
Aggregate exports from i to j are defined as the sum of export of each individual firm with
–ijh:
productivity w $ w
X hij 5 wi Li 3 x hij 1w 2 dGh 1w 2.

`
w hij
–ijh 2 and the productivity
From equation (9) we know the size of firm-level exports x hij 1w Z w $ w
– h
threshold wij . Using the specific assumption about the distribution Gh of productivity shocks
from equation (3), we can rewrite aggregate exports as
5 wi Li 3
`
Yj 1s 2 12 / g u hj s21 w2gh21
X hij l3h 3a b 3a b 3 wsh21 3 dw,
w hij Y w ithij gh
wt h
–ijh 5 lh4 3 a Y b 3 a i ij b 3 fijh 11/ 1s212 2 ,
1/g
with w
Yj u hj
where lh3 and lh4 are some constants.21 Given the assumption of Pareto distributed productivity
and isoelastic preferences, we get a simple solution for the integral. After solving the integral
and rearranging, we get
w i L i Yj w ithij 2gh
X hij 5 lh 3 3a b 3 1 f hij 2 2 1gh / 1sh212212 ,
Y u hj
with lh 5 11 1 l52 3 mh. Noting that Yi 5 11 1 l52 wiLi, we get
Yi 3 Yj w ithij 2gh
X hij 5 mh 3 3a b 3 1 f hij 2 2 1gh / 1sh212212 .
Y u hj
Proposition 2 (Reminded):
(i) The elasticity of the intensive margin of trade with respect to variable trade costs is 1s 2 12.
(ii) The elasticity of the extensive margin of trade with respect to variable costs is 1g 2
1s 2 122.
l 3 5 s 1lh42 12s, lh4 5 3sh /mh 3 gh / 1gh 2 1sh 2 12 2 3 1/ 11 1 l 52 4 1/gh , and l 5 5 5 3 gHh51 1 1sh 2 12 / gh 2 1mh /sh 2 4 /
21 h
312gHh51 1 1sh 2 12 / gh 2 1mh /sh 2 4 6.

(iii) The elasticity of the intensive margin of trade with respect to fixed costs is 0.
(iv) The elasticity of the extensive margin of trade with respect to fixed costs is 3g 2
1s 2 124 / 1s 2 12.
Proof:
(i) The definition of the intensive and the extensive margins from Proposition 2 gives us
d ln X ij 2dX ij/dtij
awiLi 3
tij `
'x ij 1 w 2 tij 'wij
2 5 52 dG 1w 2 b 1 b –ij 2 G9 1w
awi Li x 1w –ij 2 3
d ln tij X ij/tij X ij wij 'tij X ij 'tij
8 8
Intensive margin elasticity Extensive margin elasticity
d ln X ij 2dX ij/df ij
awiLi 3
f ij `
'x ij 1 w 2 f ij 'wij
2 5 52 dG 1w 2 b 1 b. –ij 2 G9 1w
awi Li x 1w –ij 2 3
d ln f ij X ij/f ij X ij wij 'f ij X ij 'f ij
8 8
Intensive margin elasticity Extensive margin elasticity
Using the definition of equilibrium individual exports from equation (9), and assuming that
country i is small enough and/or remote enough, so that 0uj /0tij 5 2g 1Yi / Y2 3 wi2g tij2g21 3
f ij2 3g2 1s212 4/ 1s212 < 0, we get
'x ij 1 w 2 x ij 1 w 2
5 2 1s 2 12 .
'tij tij
Integrating over all exporters, we get
with respect to variable costs 5 2 awiLi 3

Elasticity of the intensive margin tij `
'x ij 1 w 2
dG 1w 2 b
X ij wij 'tij
wiLi 3 xij 1w 2 dG 1w 2
`
tij wij
5 1s 2 12
X ij tij
tij X ij
5 1s 2 12
X ij tij
5 1s 2 12.
(ii) Using the definition of the equilibrium productivity threshold from equation (9), we get
'wij wij
5 .
'tij tij
Using the definition of firm-level exports xij(w) 5 lijws21 from equation (9), and the definition
of the distribution of productivity shocks G9(w) 5 w2g21 /g from equation (3), we can rewrite
aggregate exports in the following way:
Xij 5 wi Li 3 xij 1w 2 dG 1w 2
`
w hij
5 wi Li 3 lijws21
`
w 2g21
dw
wij g
1 –ij1s2122g
5 w L l s21 w
1 g 2 1 s 2 1 2 2 g i i ij
1 –ij2 G9 1w
–ij2 3 w
–ij .
5 3 wiLi xij 1w
g 2 s 2 12
1
We therefore get the simple solution for the elasticity:
Elasticity of the extensive margin tij 'w

with respect to variable costs 5 awiLi x 1w –ij2 3 ij b
–ij2 G9 1w
X ij 'tij
tij w i L i x 1 wij 2 Gr 1 wij 2 3 wij

5 a b
X ij tij
tij X ij
5 1g 2 1s 2 12 2
X ij tij
5 1g 2 1s 2 12 2.
(iii) Using the definition of the equilibrium firm-level exports from equation (9), we get
'x ij 1 w 2
5 0.
'f ij
We directly derive that the elasticity of the intensive margin of trade with respect to fixed costs
is 0.
(iv) Using the definition of the equilibrium productivity threshold from equation (9), we get
'wij 1 wij
5 3 ,
'f ij s21 f ij
and using the same procedure as in (ii), we prove that the elasticity of the extensive margin with
respect to fixed trade costs is g/ 1s 2 12 2 1.
References
Anderson, James E. 1979. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic
Review, 69(1): 106–16.
Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puz-
zle.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 170–92.
Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. “Trade Costs.” Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3):
691–751.
Andersson, Martin. 2007. “Entry Costs and Adjustments on the Extensive Margin—An Analysis of How
Familiarity Breeds Exports.” Unpublished.
Arkolakis, Costas. 2007. “Market Access Costs and the New Consumers Margin in International Trade.”
Unpublished.
Axtell, Robert L. 2001. “Zipf Distribution of U. S. Firm Sizes.” Science, 293(5536): 1818–20.
Crozet, Matthieu, and Pamina Koenig. 2007. “Structural Gravity Equation with Extensive and Intensive
Margins.” Unpublished.
Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 2002. “Technology, Geography, and Trade.” Econometrica, 70(5):
1741–79.
Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz. 2007. “An Anatomy of International Trade: Evi-
dence from French Firms.” Unpublished.
Gabaix, Xavier. 2008. “Power Laws.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd edition, ed.
Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein. Forthcoming. “Estimating Trade Flows: Trad-
ing Partners and Trading Volumes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz, and Stephen R. Yeaple. 2004. “Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous
Firms.” American Economic Review, 94(1): 300–16.
Hummels, David, and Peter J. Klenow. 2005. “The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports.” American
Economic Review, 95(3): 704–23.
Koenig, Pamina. 2005. “The Intensive and Extensive Margins of Trade: Evidence from French Firms.”
Unpublished.
Krugman, Paul. 1980. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American
Luttmer, Erzo G. J. 2007. “Selection, Growth, and the Size Distribution of Firms.” Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 122(3): 1103–44.
Melitz, Marc J. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Pro-
ductivity.” Econometrica, 71(6): 1695–1725.
Obstfeld, Maurice, and Kenneth Rogoff. 2001. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconom-
ics: Is There a Common Cause?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, ed. Ben S. Bernanke and
Kenneth Rogoff, 339–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rauch, James E. 1999. “Networks versus Markets in International Trade.” Journal of International Eco-
nomics, 48(1): 7–35.
Ruhl, Kim J. 2005. “The Elasticity Puzzle in International Economics.” Unpublished.
Simon, Herbert A., and Charles P. Bonini. 1958. “The Size Distribution of Business Firms.” American
Yi, Kei-Mu. 2003. “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?” Journal of Political
Economy, 111(1): 52–102.
This article has been cited by:
1. Zhao Wanwan, Zhou Yanan, Zhao Yongliang. 2023. Temporary trade barriers and enterprise export
market changes: evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36:3. . [Crossref]
2. Damien Dussaux, Stéphanie Monjon. 2023. Selling under other skies when energy prices skyrocket:
How do the companies adapt their export strategy when energy prices rise?. Energy Policy 183, 113777.
[Crossref]
3. Rosanna Pittiglio. 2023. Counterfeiting and firm survival. Do international trade activities matter?.
International Business Review 32:5, 102145. [Crossref]
4. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Stephen R. Cray, Antoine Gervais. 2023. Increasing marginal costs, firm
heterogeneity, and the gains from “deep” international trade agreements. Journal of International
Economics 144, 103774. [Crossref]
5. Christophe Gouel, Sébastien Jean. 2023. Love of variety and gains from trade. European Economic
Review 158, 104558. [Crossref]
6. Xiaoyan Niu, Baoqi Li, Guohua Ni, Zhenling Chen. 2023. Exploring the Nexus of Enterprise
Ownership Structure and Food Safety Incidents: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and
Trade 3, 1-13. [Crossref]
7. Anirudh Shingal, Prachi Agarwal. 2023. How did GVC‐trade respond to previous health shocks?
Evidence from SARS and MERS. Review of International Economics 5. . [Crossref]
8. Clément Malgouyres, Thierry Mayer, Clément Mazet-Sonilhac. 2023. Who Benefits from State
Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms: Comment.
American Economic Review 113:8, 2270-2286. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
9. Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor, Abraham Lartey, Christian Ritzel. 2023. Agri-food importing firms amid
a global health crisis. Food Policy 119, 102507. [Crossref]
10. Vanessa Alviarez, Ayhab F. Saad. 2023. Multinational production and intra‐firm trade. Review of
International Economics 31:3, 826-853. [Crossref]
11. Tomohiro Ara. 2023. Two‐sided heterogeneity: New implications for input trade. Review of
12. Antoine Ferey, Andreas Haufler, Carlo Perroni. 2023. Incentives, globalization, and redistribution.
Journal of Public Economics 224, 104920. [Crossref]
13. Joseph B. Steinberg. 2023. Export market penetration dynamics. Journal of International Economics
122, 103807. [Crossref]
14. Stefano Bolatto, Graziano Moramarco. 2023. Gains from trade and their quantification: Does sectoral
disaggregation matter?. International Economics 174, 44-68. [Crossref]
15. Kazunobu Hayakawa, Keiko Ito, Kyoji Fukao, Ivan Deseatnicov. 2023. The impact of the
strengthening of export controls on Japanese exports of dual-use goods. International Economics 174,
160-179. [Crossref]
16. Vincent Rebeyrol. 2023. Protection Without Discrimination. The Economic Journal 60. . [Crossref]
17. Mathias Juust. 2023. Trade effects of a negative export shock on direct exporters and wholesalers.
Journal of Economic Studies 50:5, 967-986. [Crossref]
18. Shaosheng Jin, Baojie Ma, Yuqing Zheng, Xin Jin, Wenchao Wu. 2023. Short‐term impact of food
safety standards on agri‐product exports: Evidence from Japan's positive list system on Chinese
vegetable exports. Journal of Agricultural Economics . [Crossref]
19. Gunnar Heins. 2023. Endogenous Vertical Differentiation, Variety, and the Unequal Gains from
Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 105:4, 910-930. [Crossref]
20. Ana M. Fernandes, Peter J. Klenow, Sergii Meleshchuk, Martha Denisse Pierola, Andrés Rodríguez-
Clare. 2023. The Intensive Margin in Trade: How Big and How Important?. American Economic
Journal: Macroeconomics 15:3, 320-354. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
21. Brent Neiman, Joseph Vavra. 2023. The Rise of Niche Consumption. American Economic Journal:
Macroeconomics 15:3, 224-264. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
22. Jing Fu, Guangji Tong. 2023. The State of Grain Trade between China and Russia: Analysis of
Growth Effect and Its Influencing Factors. Agriculture 13:7, 1407. [Crossref]
23. Andrea Szalavetz, Nicolas Sauvage. 2023. The financialization of corporate venture capital investment?
The corporation as a venture capitalist. Socio-Economic Review 19. . [Crossref]
24. Raphaël Chiappini, Cyrielle Gaglio. 2023. Digital intensity, trade costs and exports' quality upgrading.
The World Economy 69. . [Crossref]
25. David Rezza Baqaee, Emmanuel Farhi, Kunal Sangani. 2023. The Darwinian Returns to Scale. Review
of Economic Studies 109. . [Crossref]
26. Kexuan Zhou, Linhui Yu, Xinlin Jiang, Sanjay Kumar. 2023. Trade policy uncertainty and pollution
emissions of export enterprises—The case of China‐ASEAN free trade area. Review of International
Economics 67. . [Crossref]
27. Sonali Chowdhry, Gabriel Felbermayr. 2023. Trade liberalization along the firm size distribution: The
case of the EU‐South Korea FTA. Review of International Economics . [Crossref]
28. Satya P. Das, Vinicios P. Sant’Anna. 2023. Determinants of bilateral trade in manufacturing and
services: A unified approach. Economic Modelling 123, 106246. [Crossref]
29. Zühal Kurul. 2023. Hard and soft factors of trade facilitation and export diversification: Evidence for
developing and the least developed countries. The Developing Economies 61:2, 75-116. [Crossref]
30. Nicholas‐Joseph Lazarou, Andreas Zervas. 2023. Declining long‐run income elasticities and the rise
of cyclicality of trade: Evidence from Greece, 1995–2018. The World Economy 46:6, 1873-1888.
[Crossref]
31. Alexander Matros, Vladimir Smirnov, Andrew Wait. 2023. Sunk costs, entry and clustering. Economic
Theory 110. . [Crossref]
32. Alejandro Cuñat, Robert Zymek. 2023. Bilateral Trade Imbalances. Review of Economic Studies 132. .
[Crossref]
33. Mahdi Ghodsi. 2023. Exploring the ‘non-tariff measures black box’: Whose regulatory NTMs on
which products improve the imported quality?. International Economics 173, 45-67. [Crossref]
34. Sergey Nigai. 2023. Selection effects, inequality, and aggregate gains from trade. Journal of
International Economics 142, 103752. [Crossref]
35. Peter H. Egger, Jie Li, Han Wu. 2023. Firms’ entry choices across export products and markets, and
the consequences of trade in an open economy: Evidence from China. Journal of Economic Behavior
& Organization 209, 243-262. [Crossref]
36. Luigi Capoani. 2023. Review of the gravity model: origins and critical analysis of its theoretical
development. SN Business & Economics 3:5. . [Crossref]
37. Haichao Fan, Guangyu Nie, Zhiwei Xu. 2023. Market uncertainty and international trade. Review of
Economic Dynamics 69. . [Crossref]
38. Dong Xuan Nguyen. 2023. Trade and employment in Vietnam: how firms' trade matters. Asian-Pacific
Economic Literature 37:1, 20-38. [Crossref]
39. Dan Liu, Liugang Sheng, Miaojie Yu. 2023. Highways and firms' exports: Evidence from China.
Review of International Economics 31:2, 413-443. [Crossref]
40. Bart J. Bronnenberg, Tobias J. Klein, Yan Xu. 2023. Consumer Time Budgets and Grocery Shopping
Behavior. Management Science 75. . [Crossref]
41. Rishav Bista, W. Charles Sawyer. 2023. Labour market rigidity and trade margins. The World Economy
126. . [Crossref]
42. Kichun Kang. 2023. Heterogeneous welfare gains from import variety across regions: evidence from
South Korea. Applied Economics 55:12, 1328-1340. [Crossref]
43. Hanna Tkachuk, Volodymyr Vyhovskyi, Igor Burachek, Dina Yarmolyk. 2023. The agrarian economy
of occupied territories. What are the agricultural enterprises of the Luhansk and Donetsk region
earning?. International Journal of Environmental Studies 80:2, 363-371. [Crossref]
44. José L. Groizard, Joan Martín-Montaner. 2023. Migrants, regulations, and trade. Economic Modelling
120, 106186. [Crossref]
45. Agnes Kügler, Andreas Reinstaller, Klaus S. Friesenbichler. 2023. Can value chain integration explain
the diverging economic performance within the EU?. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics 50:1,
25-47. [Crossref]
46. Ohyun Kwon, Hao Zhao, Min Qiang Zhao. 2023. Global firms and emissions: Investigating the dual
channels of emissions abatement. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 118, 102772.
[Crossref]
47. Bing Li, Linyue Li, Rou Li, Yunsong Yue. 2023. Internet and firms’ exports and imports: Firm level
evidence from China. The World Economy 46:3, 835-872. [Crossref]
48. Vanessa Hellwig. 2023. Digital gravity? Firm birth and relocation patterns of young digital firms in
Germany. Journal of Regional Science 63:2, 340-378. [Crossref]
49. Soonchan Park, Innwon Park. 2023. Firm size‐specific trade effects of regional trade agreements:
Estimating extensive and intensive margins of trade. Asian Economic Journal 37:1, 82-112. [Crossref]
50. Sergey Mityakov, Margarita Portnykh, Kevin K Tsui. 2023. International politics and oil trade:
evidence from Russian oil exports. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 5. . [Crossref]
51. Manuel García-Santana, Marta Santamaría. Understanding Home Bias in Procurement: Evidence from
National and Subnational Governments 84, . [Crossref]
52. Lionel Artige, Sousso Bignandi. 2023. The firm size distribution: evidence from Belgium. Applied
Economics 55:8, 907-923. [Crossref]
53. Fei Jin, Lung-fei Lee, Jihai Yu. 2023. Estimating flow data models of international trade: dual gravity
and spatial interactions. Econometric Reviews 42:2, 157-194. [Crossref]
54. Marc Badia-Miró, Anna Carreras-MarÍn, Michael Huberman. 2023. Smooth sailing: market
integration, agglomeration, and productivity growth in interwar Brazil. European Review of Economic
History 27:1, 45-69. [Crossref]
55. Suhas Jadhav, Ishita Ghosh. 2023. Future Prospects of the Gravity Model of Trade: A Bibliometric
Review (1993–2021). Foreign Trade Review 63, 001573252211401. [Crossref]
56. Banri Ito, Katsunori Shirai. 2023. Patent law harmonization and international trade. International
Journal of Economic Policy Studies 17:1, 289-306. [Crossref]
57. Niko Korpar, Mario Larch, Roman Stöllinger. 2023. The European carbon border adjustment
mechanism: a small step in the right direction. International Economics and Economic Policy 20:1,
95-138. [Crossref]
58. Valentina Rollo. 2023. Technical regulations and exporters’ dynamics: evidence from developing
countries. International Economics and Economic Policy 20:1, 189-212. [Crossref]
59. Helena Engemann, Yaghoob Jafari, Thomas Heckelei. 2023. Institutional quality and the duration of
agri‐food trade flows. Journal of Agricultural Economics 74:1, 135-154. [Crossref]
60. Andrzej Cieślik, Jan Jakub Michałek, Krzysztof Szczygielski. 2023. Direct Versus Indirect
Exports in Post-Communist Europe and Central Asia: The Role of Innovation Activities and
Internationalization. Eastern European Economics 51, 1-17. [Crossref]
61. Antonio Rodriguez‐Lopez, Miaojie Yu. 2023. All‐around trade liberalization and firm‐level
employment: Theory and evidence from China. Review of International Economics 34. . [Crossref]
62. Matteo Neri--Lainé, Gianluca Orefice, Michele Ruta. Deep Trade Agreements and Heterogeneous
Firms Exports 1, . [Crossref]
63. Simon Galle, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Moises Yi. 2023. Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate
and Distributional Effects of Trade. The Review of Economic Studies 90:1, 331-375. [Crossref]
64. Lorenzo Caliendo, Robert C. Feenstra, John Romalis, Alan M. Taylor. 2023. Tariff Reductions,
Heterogeneous Firms, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for 1990–2010. IMF Economic Review 102. .
[Crossref]
65. Shujaat Naeem Azmi, Tasneem Khan, Wajahat Azmi, Naghma Azhar. 2023. A panel cointegration
analysis of linkages between international trade and tourism: case of India and South Asian Association
for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries. Quality & Quantity 40. . [Crossref]
66. Yulin Hou, Yun Wang, Hakan Yilmazkuday. 2023. Gravity channels in trade. The Journal of
International Trade & Economic Development 32:1, 37-65. [Crossref]
67. Joshua C. Fjelstul. 2023. The political economy of noncompliance in customs unions. Journal of
Theoretical Politics 35:1, 31-57. [Crossref]
68. Woori Lee, Alen Mulabdic, Michele Ruta. 2023. Third-country effects of regional trade agreements:
A firm-level analysis. Journal of International Economics 140, 103688. [Crossref]
69. Chen Liu, Xiao Ma. 2023. Migration, tariffs, and China's export surge. Journal of International
70. Yi-Fan Chen, Wen-Tai Hsu, Shin-Kun Peng. 2023. Innovation, firm size distribution, and gains from
trade. Theoretical Economics 18:1, 341-380. [Crossref]
71. Qiugu He, Guang Yang, Jianhuan Xu. 2023. Multi-Product Exports, Imported Inputs and Within-
Firm Productivity Dispersion. SSRN Electronic Journal 83. . [Crossref]
72. Matteo Neri-Lainé, Gianluca Orefice, Michele Ruta. 2023. Deep Trade Agreements and
Heterogeneous Firms Exports. SSRN Electronic Journal 98. . [Crossref]
73. Wyatt Brooks, Pau Pujolas. 2023. Gains from Trade with Variable Trade Elasticities. SSRN Electronic
Journal 107. . [Crossref]
74. Anirban Sanyal. 2023. Caught in the Crossfire: How Trade Policy Uncertainty Impacts Global Trade.
SSRN Electronic Journal 126. . [Crossref]
75. Christoph Boehm, Aaron Flaaen, Nitya Pandalai-Nayar. 2023. New Measurement of Export
Participation in U.S. Manufacturing. SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
76. Noé J. Nava, William Ridley, Sandy Dall'erba. 2023. A model of the U.S. food system: What are
the determinants of the state vulnerabilities to production shocks and supply chain disruptions?.
Agricultural Economics 54:1, 95-109. [Crossref]
77. Yaghoob Jafari, Maximilian Koppenberg, Stefan Hirsch, Thomas Heckelei. 2023. Markups and
export behavior: Firm‐level evidence from the French food processing industry. American Journal of
78. Raul Serrano, Natalia Dejo‐Oricain, Juan Ferrer, Vicente Pinilla, Silvia Abella‐Garcés, Maria Teresa
Maza. 2023. Domestic clustered networks and internationalization of agrifood SMEs. Agribusiness 39:1,
167-195. [Crossref]
79. María Victoria Lacaze. 2022. Los fundamentos conceptuales del modelo gravitacional de comercio:
una revisión de la literatura. Estudios económicos 40:80, 251-279. [Crossref]
80. Mudaser Ahad Bhat, Aamir Jamal, Mirza Nazrana Beg. 2022. Trade Integration and Export
Aspiration: Evidence from India’s Trade in Goods with BRICS Countries. Organizations and Markets
in Emerging Economies 13:2, 490-514. [Crossref]
81. Stefano Costa, Federico Sallusti, Claudio Vicarelli, Davide Zurlo. 2022. Tech on the ROC: export
threshold and technology adoption interacted. Small Business Economics 59:4, 1593-1611. [Crossref]
82. Shiguang Peng, Le Wang. 2022. A Survival Analysis of China’s Trade of Environmental Goods.
Sustainability 14:24, 16358. [Crossref]
83. Yuko Imura. 2022. Reassessing trade barriers with global production networks. Review of Economic
Dynamics 122. . [Crossref]
84. Ana Cuadros, Antonio Navas, Jordi Paniagua. 2022. Moving ideas across borders: Foreign inventors,
patents and FDI. The World Economy 45:12, 3652-3678. [Crossref]
85. Ziran Ding. 2022. Firm heterogeneity, variable markups, and multinational production: A review
from trade policy perspective. Journal of Economic Surveys 36:5, 1311-1357. [Crossref]
86. Jesse Mora, Michael Olabisi. 2022. Export growth drivers and economic development. Empirical
87. Jesús Peiró-Palomino, Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, Marta Suárez-Varela. 2022. Do countries with
higher institutional quality transition to cleaner trade?. Ecological Economics 201, 107554. [Crossref]
88. Xuebing Yang. 2022. Value-added share and elasticity of trade to barriers. Applied Economics Letters
29:17, 1599-1604. [Crossref]
89. Woan Foong Wong. 2022. The Round Trip Effect: Endogenous Transport Costs and International
Trade. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 14:4, 127-166. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
90. Fabrice Defever, Alejandro Riaño. 2022. Firm-destination heterogeneity and the distribution of export
intensity. Economics Letters 219, 110810. [Crossref]
91. Qinglan Wu, Guifu Chen, Jing Han, Liyan Wu. 2022. Does Corporate ESG Performance Improve
Export Intensity? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Sustainability 14:20, 12981. [Crossref]
92. Edward J. Balistreri, David G. Tarr. 2022. Welfare gains in the Armington, Krugman and Melitz
models: Comparisons grounded on gravity. Economic Inquiry 60:4, 1681-1703. [Crossref]
93. Guillaume Daudin, Jérôme Héricourt, Lise Patureau. 2022. International transport costs: new findings
from modeling additive costs. Journal of Economic Geography 22:5, 989-1044. [Crossref]
94. Martin Alfaro. 2022. Assessing gains of trade in monopolistic competition under the presence of
industry leaders. Applied Economics 54:41, 4711-4724. [Crossref]
95. Jordi Paniagua, Cristina Villó, Maria Escrivà-Beltran. 2022. Cross-Border Higher Education: The
Expansion of International Branch Campuses. Research in Higher Education 63:6, 1037-1057.
[Crossref]
96. Raymond Adu, Ioannis Litsios, Mark Baimbridge. 2022. ECOWAS single currency: Prospective
effects on trade. Journal of International Money and Finance 126, 102651. [Crossref]
97. Luca Macedoni. 2022. Asymmetric information, quality, and regulations. Review of International
98. Johannes Van Biesebroeck, Yingting Yi, Elena Zaurino. 2022. Trade liberalisation and the extensive
margin of differentiated goods: Evidence from China*. The World Economy 45:9, 2724-2747.
[Crossref]
99. Markus Brueckner, Ngo Van Long, Joaquin Vespignani. 2022. Trade, education, and income
inequality. Applied Economics 54:40, 4608-4631. [Crossref]
100. Jialin Guan, Huijuan Xu, Yunfeng Wang, Yaoguang Ma, Yu Wang, Rui Gao, Kexuan Yu. 2022. Digital
Economy and Health: A Case Study of a Leading Enterprise's Value Mining Mode in the Global Big
Health Market. Frontiers in Public Health 10. . [Crossref]
101. Jason Query. 2022. Gross Product, Population Distribution and Heterogeneity of Border Effects in
Gravity Models of Trade. Open Economies Review 69. . [Crossref]
102. Ruben Dewitte, Michel Dumont, Glenn Rayp, Peter Willemé. 2022. Unobserved heterogeneity in
the productivity distribution and gains from trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne
d'économique 55:3, 1566-1597. [Crossref]
103. Luca Macedoni, Mingzhi (Jimmy) Xu. 2022. FLEXIBILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY: TOWARD
THE UNDERSTANDING OF FIRM HETEROGENEITY. International Economic Review 63:3,
1055-1108. [Crossref]
104. Jing Wang, Xi Tian. 2022. Impacts of the belt and road initiative on China’s bilateral trade. Journal
of the Asia Pacific Economy 27:3, 400-424. [Crossref]
105. Han-Lin Wang, Wan-Wan Zhao. 2022. Research on the Impact of Technical Measures on Enterprise
Export Participation. Sustainability 14:14, 8909. [Crossref]
106. Juan de Lucio, Raúl Mínguez, Asier Minondo, Francisco Requena. 2022. Impact of Covid-19
containment measures on trade. International Review of Economics & Finance 80, 766-778. [Crossref]
107. Lisandra Flach, Florian Unger. 2022. Quality and gravity in international trade. Journal of International
108. Sven Blank, Peter H. Egger, Valeria Merlo, Georg Wamser. 2022. A structural quantitative analysis
of services trade de-liberalization. Journal of International Economics 137, 103605. [Crossref]
109. Lionel Fontagné, Houssein Guimbard, Gianluca Orefice. 2022. Tariff-based product-level trade
elasticities. Journal of International Economics 137, 103593. [Crossref]
110. Margarita Gáfaro, Heitor S. Pellegrina. 2022. Trade, farmers’ heterogeneity, and agricultural
productivity: Evidence from Colombia. Journal of International Economics 137, 103598. [Crossref]
111. Julia Schmidt, Walter Steingress. 2022. No double standards: Quantifying the impact of standard
harmonization on trade. Journal of International Economics 137, 103619. [Crossref]
112. Mario Larch, Serge Shikher, Constantinos Syropoulos, Yoto V. Yotov. 2022. Quantifying the impact
of economic sanctions on international trade in the energy and mining sectors. Economic Inquiry 60:3,
1038-1063. [Crossref]
113. Yoto V. Yotov. 2022. On the role of domestic trade flows for estimating the gravity model of trade.
Contemporary Economic Policy 40:3, 526-540. [Crossref]
114. Marina TAN, Sevcan GÜNEŞ, Filiz AKBAŞ-YEŞİLYURT. 2022. Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür
Analizi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9:1, 102-117. [Crossref]
115. Barchynai Kimsanova, Thomas Herzfeld. 2022. Policy analysis with Melitz-type gravity model:
Evidence from Kyrgyzstan. Journal of Asian Economics 80, 101482. [Crossref]
116. Wessel N. Vermeulen. 2022. Stuck outside the single market; Evidence from firms in central and
eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics 50:2, 415-434. [Crossref]
117. Jinghui Duan, Yinuo Liu. 2022. The Decomposition of Information and Communication Technology
Products Trading: A Case Study of China. Economies 10:6, 126. [Crossref]
118. Kemal Türkcan, Socrates Majune Kraido, Eliud Moyi. 2022. Export margins and survival: A firm‐
level analysis using Kenyan data. South African Journal of Economics 90:2, 149-174. [Crossref]
119. Michael O Allen, Kenneth Scheve. 2022. Sustaining Capitalism and Democracy: Lessons from Global
Competition Policy. International Studies Review 24:2. . [Crossref]
120. Xuemei Liu, Wei Chen, William H. Meyers, Yinguo Dong. 2022. Effects of heterogeneous SPS
measures on agricultural growth: Evidence from China. PLOS ONE 17:5, e0266904. [Crossref]
121. Natalie Chen, Dennis Novy. 2022. Gravity and Heterogeneous Trade Cost Elasticities. The Economic
Journal 132:644, 1349-1377. [Crossref]
122. Christina Ruth Elisabeth, Kiki Verico. 2022. The effects of Indonesia’s technical barriers to trade on
manufacturing exports: an empirical analysis using the pseudo-Poisson maximum likelihood method.
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 21:2, 160-181. [Crossref]
123. Richard Friberg, Frode Steen, Simen A. Ulsaker. 2022. Hump-Shaped Cross-Price Effects and
the Extensive Margin in Cross-Border Shopping. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 14:2,
408-438. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
124. Jue Wang, Shi Wang, Hua Wang, Yan Song. 2022. A Numerical Simulation Analysis Framework of
Sustainable Regional Economic Cooperation: A Case Study of the New Silk Road Economic Belt.
Sustainability 14:10, 5991. [Crossref]
125. Zhe Chen, Yoshinori Kurokawa. 2022. Do exporters respond to both tariffs and nominal exchange
rates? Evidence from Chinese firm‐product data. Review of International Economics 30:2, 514-548.
[Crossref]
126. Adriana Cardozo, Inmaculada Martínez‐Zarzoso, Paula L. Vogler. 2022. The impact of free trade
agreements on Middle East and North Africa exports of intermediate and final goods. The World
Economy 45:5, 1501-1527. [Crossref]
127. Luca Macedoni. 2022. Monopsonistic competition, trade, and the profit share*. The Scandinavian
Journal of Economics 124:2, 488-515. [Crossref]
128. Xin Zhao, Jeff Luckstead, Stephen Devadoss. 2022. Decomposition of extensive and intensive margin
impacts of trade policies. The World Economy 45:4, 971-1020. [Crossref]
129. Firat Demir, Chenghao Hu. 2022. Institutional similarity, firm heterogeneity and export
sophistication. The World Economy 45:4, 1213-1241. [Crossref]
130. Sang‐Wook (Stanley) Cho, Hansoo Choi, Julián P. Díaz. 2022. The causal effect of free trade
agreements on the trade margins: Product‐level evidence from geographically distant partners.
Southern Economic Journal 88:4, 1453-1489. [Crossref]
131. Kan Yue. 2022. Non‐tariff measures, product quality and import demand. Economic Inquiry 60:2,
870-900. [Crossref]
132. Nasreen Nawaz. 2022. A Dynamic Optimal Trade Facilitation Policy. The International Trade Journal
36:2, 102-122. [Crossref]
133. Concepción Betrán, Michael Huberman. 2022. Against the Grain: Spanish Trade Policy in the
Interwar Years. The Journal of Economic History 82:1, 42-86. [Crossref]
134. Grégoire Garsous, Stephan Worack. 2022. Technological expertise as a driver of environmental
technology diffusion through trade: Evidence from the wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy
Policy 162, 112799. [Crossref]
135. Federico Esposito. 2022. Demand risk and diversification through international trade. Journal of
136. Sven Blank, Peter H. Egger. 2022. On the sensitivity of trade costs to services trade restrictions †.
The World Economy 45:3, 592-607. [Crossref]
137. Pamela Smith, Xiangwen Kong. 2022. Intellectual property rights and trade: The exceptional case of
GMOs. The World Economy 45:3, 763-811. [Crossref]
138. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet, Augusto Mussi Alvim, Miguel Atienza. 2022. Trade agreements and
participation in global value chains: Empirical evidence from Latin America. The World Economy
45:3, 702-738. [Crossref]
139. İpek Çınar, Robert Gulotty. 2022. Negotiating exclusion: Regulatory barriers in preferential trade
agreements. Economics & Politics 34:1, 192-220. [Crossref]
140. Tobias Sytsma. 2022. Improving Preferential Market Access through Rules of Origin: Firm-Level
Evidence from Bangladesh. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14:1, 440-472. [Abstract]
[View PDF article] [PDF with links]
141. Anna D’Ambrosio, Sandro Montresor. 2022. The pro-export effect of subnational migration
networks: new evidence from Spanish provinces. Review of World Economics 158:1, 53-107. [Crossref]
142. Rod Falvey, Neil Foster-McGregor. 2022. The breadth of preferential trade agreements and the
margins of exports. Review of World Economics 158:1, 181-251. [Crossref]
143. Pushan Dutt, Ana Maria Santacreu, Daniel A. Traça. 2022. The gravity of experience. Canadian
Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 55:1, 213-248. [Crossref]
144. Anca D. Cristea, Anna Miromanova. 2022. Firm‐level trade effects of WTO accession: Evidence from
Russia. Review of International Economics 30:1, 237-281. [Crossref]
145. Robert Feenstra, Chang Hong. 2022. China’s import demand for agricultural products: The impact
of the Phase One trade agreement. Review of International Economics 30:1, 345-368. [Crossref]
146. Julia Grübler, Mahdi Ghodsi, Robert Stehrer. 2022. Import demand elasticities revisited. The Journal
of International Trade & Economic Development 31:1, 46-74. [Crossref]
147. Jürgen Paetz. Geografie, Regionalökonomie und Infrastruktur 75-82. [Crossref]
148. Haillie Na-Kyung Lee, Yu-Ming Liou. 2022. Where You Work Is Where You Stand: A Firm-Based
Framework for Understanding Trade Opinion. International Organization 76:3, 713-740. [Crossref]
149. Shai Bernstein, Emanuele Colonnelli, Davide Malacrino, Tim McQuade. 2022. Who creates new
firms when local opportunities arise?. Journal of Financial Economics 143:1, 107-130. [Crossref]
150. Robert C. Feenstra, Luca Macedoni, Mingzhi Xu. 2022. Large Firms, Consumer Heterogeneity and
the Rising Share of Profits. SSRN Electronic Journal 86. . [Crossref]
151. Luigi Capoani. 2022. An Innovative Deepening of the Gravity Model Through Laws of Physics.
152. Georg Schneider, Frank Stähler, Georg U. Thunecke. 2022. The (Non-)Neutrality of Value-Added
Taxation. SSRN Electronic Journal 128. . [Crossref]
153. Manuel Oechslin, Elias Steiner. 2022. On Curbing Informality and Poverty. SSRN Electronic Journal
135. . [Crossref]
154. German Pupato, Ben Sand, Jeanne Tschopp. 2022. Estimating the Gains from Trade in Frictional
Local Labor Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal 34. . [Crossref]
155. Lian Allub, Nicolás Aragón. 2022. Asymmetric Effects of Trade and FDI: The Role of Country Size
and Bridge Multinational Production. SSRN Electronic Journal 88. . [Crossref]
156. Claudio Labanca, Dario Pozzoli. 2022. Hours Constraints and Wage Differentials Across Firms. SSRN
Electronic Journal 22. . [Crossref]
157. Alejandro Riaño, Fabrice Defever. 2022. Firm-Destination Heterogeneity and the Distribution of
Export Intensity. SSRN Electronic Journal 21. . [Crossref]
158. Pol Antràs, Davin Chor. Global value chains 297-376. [Crossref]
159. Lorenzo Caliendo, Fernando Parro. Trade policy 219-295. [Crossref]
160. Carl Gaigné, Christophe Gouel. Trade in agricultural and food products 4845-4931. [Crossref]
161. Daisuke Fujii. 2022. International Trade Dynamics with Sunk Costs and Productivity Shocks. SSRN
162. Emanuele Brancati. 2022. Help in a Foreign Land: Internationalized Banks and Firms Export. SSRN
163. Sangho Shin. 2022. Selection into Outsourcing Versus Integration Strategies for Heterogeneous
Multinationals. SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
164. Emanuele Brancati. 2022. Help in a Foreign Land: Internationalized Banks and Firms’ Export. SSRN
165. Chengyan Yue, Yufeng Lai, Hayk Khachatryan, Alan Hodges. 2022. Effect of geographic distance on
domestic trade: A case of the US Green industry. Agribusiness 38:1, 154-174. [Crossref]
166. Julien Gourdon, Laura Hering, Stéphanie Monjon, Sandra Poncet. 2022. Estimating the repercussions
from China's export value‐added tax rebate policy*. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 124:1,
243-277. [Crossref]
167. Da Fang, Xiaoke Zhang. 2021. The Protective Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Agricultural
Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from China. Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16:7, 3202-3217. [Crossref]
168. Ailan Liu, Cuicui Lu, Zhixuan Wang. 2021. Does cultural distance hinder exports?: A comparative
study of China and the United States. Economic Modelling 105, 105668. [Crossref]
169. Dongsheng Sun, Yifang Liu, Jason Grant, Yanyu Long, Xiaojuan Wang, Chaoping Xie. 2021. Impact
of food safety regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from China's import refusal data. Food Policy
105, 102185. [Crossref]
170. Rajiv Nathoo, Ruhul Salim, Vinaye Ancharaz, Mahfuz Kabir. 2021. Does aid for trade diversify sub-
Saharan Africa’s exports at the intensive and extensive margins?. Applied Economics 53:55, 6412-6425.
[Crossref]
171. Roger Hosein, Rebecca Gookool, George Saridakis. 2021. An Assessment of the Impact of the
CARIFORUM EU-EPA on CARIFORUM Exports to the EU (2000 to 2017). The International
Trade Journal 35:6, 540-557. [Crossref]
172. Mariam Camarero, Sergi Moliner, Cecilio Tamarit. 2021. Is there a euro effect in the drivers of US
FDI? New evidence using Bayesian model averaging techniques. Review of World Economics 157:4,
881-926. [Crossref]
173. Maria Bas, Pamela Bombarda, Sébastien Jean, Gianluca Orefice. 2021. Firms’ exports, volatility and
skills: Evidence from France. European Economic Review 140, 103941. [Crossref]
174. Priyaranjan Jha, Antonio Rodriguez-Lopez. 2021. Monopsonistic labor markets and international
trade. European Economic Review 140, 103939. [Crossref]
175. Wen-Tai Hsu, Lin Ma. 2021. Urbanization policy and economic development: A quantitative analysis
of China's differential hukou reforms. Regional Science and Urban Economics 91, 103639. [Crossref]
176. Shafaat Yar Khan, Armen Khederlarian. 2021. How does trade respond to anticipated tariff changes?
Evidence from NAFTA. Journal of International Economics 133, 103538. [Crossref]
177. Stefano Iandolo, Anna Ferragina. 2021. International activities and innovation: Evidence from Italy
with a special regressor approach. The World Economy 44:11, 3300-3325. [Crossref]
178. Cletus C. Coughlin, Dennis Novy. 2021. ESTIMATING BORDER EFFECTS: THE IMPACT
OF SPATIAL AGGREGATION. International Economic Review 62:4, 1453-1487. [Crossref]
179. Ryo Makioka. 2021. The impact of export promotion with matchmaking on exports and service
outsourcing. Review of International Economics 29:5, 1418-1450. [Crossref]
180. Ewa Cieślik, Jadwiga Biegańska, Stefania Środa-Murawska. 2021. Central and Eastern European States
from an International Perspective: Economic Potential and Paths of Participation in Global Value
Chains. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57:13, 3587-3603. [Crossref]
181. Mamta Kumari, Nalin Bharti. 2021. Estimating the impact of COVID-19 on South Asia's exports:
does trade facilitation matter now more than ever?. Transnational Corporations Review 13:4, 406-421.
[Crossref]
182. Costas Arkolakis, Sharat Ganapati, Marc-Andreas Muendler. 2021. The Extensive Margin of
Exporting Products: A Firm-Level Analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 13:4,
183. Mohammad Hossein Rahmati, Mehran Ebrahimian, Seyed Ali Madanizadeh. 2021. Dynamic effects
of trade barriers with speculation on foreign currency: The case of Iran. International Economics 167,
151-173. [Crossref]
184. ASIER MARISCAL. 2021. Global ownership patterns. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
131, 104213. [Crossref]
185. Yibei Guo, Baomin Dong. 2021. Railway and trade in modern China: Evidence from the 1930s. China
Economic Review 69, 101661. [Crossref]
186. Pascal Belan, Clément Carbonnier, Martine Carré. 2021. Fiscal Devaluation with Endogenous
Markups: Productivity and Welfare*. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 123:4, 1159-1189.
[Crossref]
187. Frank Asche, Hans‐Martin Straume, Erling Vårdal. 2021. Perish or prosper: Trade patterns for highly
perishable seafood products. Agribusiness 37:4, 876-890. [Crossref]
188. Anna Maria Ferragina, Stefano Iandolo, Erol Taymaz. 2021. Decomposing the immigration-trade
link using price and quantity margins: the role of education. Applied Economics 53:41, 4734-4749.
[Crossref]
189. Peter Egger, Susie Xi Rao, Sebastiano Papini. 2021. A new algorithm for matching Chinese NBS
firm-level with customs data. China Economic Journal 14:3, 311-335. [Crossref]
190. Yi-Fan Chen, Shin-Kun Peng, Tsung-Sheng Tsai. 2021. The market structures in trade
intermediation with heterogeneous manufacturing firms. International Review of Economics & Finance
75, 501-523. [Crossref]
191. Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor, Daniele Curzi, Alessandro Olper. 2021. Trade, price and quality upgrading
effects of agri-food standards. European Review of Agricultural Economics 48:4, 835-877. [Crossref]
192. Anthony Macedo, Sofia Gouveia, João Rebelo, João Santos, Helder Fraga. 2021. International trade,
non-tariff measures and climate change: insights from Port wine exports. Journal of Economic Studies
48:6, 1228-1243. [Crossref]
193. Arman Mazhikeyev, T. Huw Edwards. 2021. Post-colonial trade between Russia and former Soviet
republics: back to big brother?. Economic Change and Restructuring 54:3, 877-918. [Crossref]
194. Seyed Ali Madanizadeh. 2021. International trade, skill premium and endogenous labor division: The
case of Mexico. Labour Economics 71, 102030. [Crossref]
195. Ronaldo Carpio, Meixin Guo. 2021. Bayesian estimation of the Eurozone currency union effect.
196. Rishav Bista, Brandon J. Sheridan. 2021. Economic growth takeoffs and the extensive and intensive
margins of trade. Review of Development Economics 25:3, 1373-1396. [Crossref]
197. Xiaomeng Li, Chen Shen, Hongbo Cai, Qinghua Chen. 2021. Are We in a De‐Globalization Process?
The Evidence from Global Trade During 2007–2017. Global Challenges 5:8, 2000096. [Crossref]
198. Daniele Curzi, Maria Garrone, Alessandro Olper. 2021. Import Competition and Firm Markups in
the Food Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 103:4, 1433-1453. [Crossref]
199. Başak Dalgıç, Burcu Fazlıoğlu, Michael Gasiorek. 2021. Does it matter where you export and does
productivity rise with exporting?. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 30:5,
766-791. [Crossref]
200. Bixuan Yang, James Anderson, Yingkai Fang. 2021. Trade duration of Chinese shrimp exports.
Aquaculture Economics & Management 25:3, 260-274. [Crossref]
201. Arsalan Ahmed, Qi Jian Hong, Hassan Tahir. 2021. Analysis of Pakistan–China FTA by propensity
score matching with difference in differences. SN Business & Economics 1:7. . [Crossref]
202. Cecile Gaubert, Oleg Itskhoki, Maximilian Vogler. 2021. Government policies in a granular global
economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 121, 95-112. [Crossref]
203. Ahmad Lashkaripour. 2021. The cost of a global tariff war: A sufficient statistics approach. Journal
of International Economics 131, 103419. [Crossref]
204. Paul R. Bergin, Ling Feng, Ching-Yi Lin. 2021. Trade and firm financing. Journal of International
205. Leslie Johns, Rachel L. Wellhausen. 2021. The price of doing business: Why replaceable foreign firms
get worse government treatment. Economics & Politics 33:2, 209-243. [Crossref]
206. Ozan Çağrı DEMİRAY. 2021. Ticaret Akımlarının Yapısal Çekim Modeli ile Sınanması: Türkiye
Örneği. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 25:1, 179-204. [Crossref]
207. Ahmad Alawadhi, Nayef Al-Shammari, Wael Alshuwaiee. 2021. Effects of the EU-GCC Economic
Agreement on the Margins of Trade. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 57:8, 2370-2388.
[Crossref]
208. Ana Margarida Fernandes, Kevin Lefebvre, Nadia Rocha. Heterogeneous Impacts of SPS and TBT
Regulations: Firm-Level Evidence from Deep Trade Agreements . [Crossref]
209. Iman Pal, Saibal Kar. 2021. Gravity Models in International Trade: An Exploration in Econo-Physics.
South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 10:1, 72-104. [Crossref]
210. Ian M. Sheldon. 2021. Reflections on a Career as an Industrial Organization and International
Economist. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 43:2, 468-499. [Crossref]
211. Jason H. Grant, Shawn Arita, Charlotte Emlinger, Robert Johansson, Chaoping Xie. 2021.
Agricultural exports and retaliatory trade actions: An empirical assessment of the 2018/2019 trade
conflict. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 43:2, 619-640. [Crossref]
212. Esmat Mostafa Kamel. 2021. The MENA region's need for more democracy and less bureaucracy: A
gravity model controlling for aspects of governance and trade freedom in MENA. The World Economy
44:6, 1885-1912. [Crossref]
213. Van Pham, Alan Woodland, Mauro Caselli. 2021. Exceptional performance of multinational suppliers:
theory and evidence. Review of World Economics 157:2, 221-269. [Crossref]
214. Matthieu Crozet, Julian Hinz, Amrei Stammann, Joschka Wanner. 2021. Worth the pain? Firms’
exporting behaviour to countries under sanctions. European Economic Review 134, 103683. [Crossref]
215. Antonio Rodriguez‐Lopez. 2021. Liquidity and the International Allocation of Economic Activity.
International Economic Review 62:2, 789-830. [Crossref]
216. Chunding Li, John Whalley. 2021. Effects of the comprehensive and progressive agreement for trans‐
pacific partnership. The World Economy 44:5, 1312-1337. [Crossref]
217. Brandon Malloy. 2021. Decomposing episodes of large growth in international trade. Review of
218. Shafaat Yar Khan, Armen Khederlarian. How Does Trade Respond to Anticipated Tariff Changes?
Evidence from NAFTA 69, . [Crossref]
219. Qi Guo, Shengjun Zhu, Ron Boschma. 2021. Networks of export markets and export market
diversification. Industrial and Corporate Change 29:6, 1381-1397. [Crossref]
220. Fida Karam, Chahir Zaki. 2021. On women participation and empowerment in international trade:
Impact on trade margins in the MENA region. The Journal of International Trade & Economic
Development 30:3, 384-406. [Crossref]
221. Martina Aronica, Giorgio Fazio, Davide Piacentino. 2021. SMEs' heterogeneity at the extensive margin
and within the intensive margin of trade. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development
30:3, 439-467. [Crossref]
222. Stephen Esaku. 2021. Export Markets and Firm Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African
Business 22:2, 254-273. [Crossref]
223. Sven Blank, Peter H. Egger. 2021. Melting constants in trade gravity’s rainbow. Economics Letters
201, 109803. [Crossref]
224. Chunding Li, John Whalley, Chuantian He, Chuangwei Lin. 2021. The 2008 Financial Crisis and
the Lack of Retaliatory Trade Intervention. CESifo Economic Studies 67:1, 78-105. [Crossref]
225. Hui-Zheng Liu, Shi-Long Li, Kevin H. Zhang. 2021. An Anatomy of China’s Export Boom: An
Approach of Trade Margins #. The Chinese Economy 54:2, 79-91. [Crossref]
226. Amat Adarov, Mahdi Ghodsi. 2021. The impact of the Eurasian Economic Union–Iran preferential
trade agreement on mutual trade at aggregate and sectoral levels. Eurasian Economic Review 11:1,
125-157. [Crossref]
227. Mariam Camarero, Sergi Moliner, Cecilio Tamarit. 2021. Japan's FDI drivers in a time of financial
uncertainty. New evidence based on Bayesian Model Averaging. Japan and the World Economy 57,
101058. [Crossref]
228. Arsalan Ahmed, Qi Jian Hong, Hassan Tahir. 2021. Effect of Trade Liberalization on Asymmetric
Countries for Homogenous and Differentiate Product: Case of Pakistan-China Free Trade Agreement.
Journal of International Logistics and Trade 19:1, 33-48. [Crossref]
229. Gal Hochman, David Zilberman. 2021. Optimal environmental taxation in response to an
environmentally-unfriendly political challenger. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
106, 102407. [Crossref]
230. Pawel M. Krolikowski, Andrew H. McCallum. 2021. Goods-market frictions and international trade.
Journal of International Economics 129, 103411. [Crossref]
231. Michael Bailey, Abhinav Gupta, Sebastian Hillenbrand, Theresa Kuchler, Robert Richmond,
Johannes Stroebel. 2021. International trade and social connectedness. Journal of International
232. Arnold Njike. 2021. Are African exports that weak? A trade in value added approach. The World
233. Carl Gaigné, Lota D. Tamini. 2021. Environmental Taxation and Import Demand for Environmental
Goods: Theory and Evidence from the European Union. Environmental and Resource Economics 78:2,
307-352. [Crossref]
234. Hongmei Wu, Lu Wan, He Tian, Zhifang Chen, Yian Zhang. 2021. The ternary margins of China's
forest products export and their determinants. Forest Policy and Economics 123, 102378. [Crossref]
235. Ana Lucia Abeliansky, Javier Barbero, Ernesto Rodriguez-Crespo. 2021. ICTs quality and quantity
and the margins of trade. Telecommunications Policy 45:1, 102056. [Crossref]
236. Bernard Hoekman, Ben Shepherd. 2021. Services Trade Policies and Economic Integration: New
Evidence for Developing Countries. World Trade Review 20:1, 115-134. [Crossref]
237. Dong Tianhao, Deng Jing. Research on the Influencing Factors of China's Manufacturing Export
Growth from the Perspective of Four-Dimensional Dynamic Decomposition Taking twenty-four EU
economies as an example 135-138. [Crossref]
238. Letizia Montinari, Massimo Riccaboni, Stefano Schiavo. 2021. Innovation, trade and multi‐product
firms. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 54:1, 311-337. [Crossref]
239. Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor, Oliver‐Ken Haase, Bernhard Brümmer. 2021. The Heterogeneous Effects
of Standards on Agricultural Trade Flows. Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:1, 25-46. [Crossref]
240. Mathias Juust, Priit Vahter, Urmas Varblane. 2021. Trade Effects of the EU–South Korea Free Trade
Agreement in the Automotive Industry. Journal of East-West Business 27:1, 1-29. [Crossref]
241. Jesse Perla, Christopher Tonetti, Michael E. Waugh. 2021. Equilibrium Technology Diffusion, Trade,
and Growth. American Economic Review 111:1, 73-128. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with
links]
242. Jaap W. B. Bos, Lu Zhang. Room to Move: Why Some Industries Drive the Trade-Specialization
Nexus and Others Do Not 265-301. [Crossref]
243. Shaista Aam, Ayesha Khatoon. Financial Inclusion Leads to Export Market Penetration: A Panel
Study on Asian and African Countries 57-71. [Crossref]
244. Raphaël Chiappini, Yves Jégourel. 2021. “The buck stops with the executives”: Assessing the impact
of workforce composition and cultural distance on French firms’ exports. Economic Modelling 94,
45-57. [Crossref]
245. Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi, Saleh Shahriar, Sokvibol Kea, Aminu Muhammad Abdullahi,
Qiangqiang Zhang, Xuexi Huo. 2021. Nigeria’s cocoa exports: a gravity model approach. Ciência
Rural 51:11. . [Crossref]
246. Monika Mrázová, J. Peter Neary, Mathieu Parenti. 2021. Sales and Markup Dispersion: Theory and
Empirics. Econometrica 89:4, 1753-1788. [Crossref]
247. Rahul Singh, Rupa Chanda. 2021. Technical regulations, intermediate inputs, and performance of
firms: Evidence from India. Journal of International Economics 128, 103412. [Crossref]
248. Pamina Koenig, Sebastian Krautheim, Claudius Löhnert, Thierry Verdier. 2021. Local Global
Watchdogs: Trade, Sourcing and the Internationalization of Social Activism. SSRN Electronic Journal
97. . [Crossref]
249. Feicheng Wang, Zheng Wang, Zhuo Zhou. 2021. Business Flies: The Trade Promoting Effect of Air
Connectivity. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
250. Xavier Giroud, Simone Lenzu, Ramain Quinn Maingi, Holger M. Mueller. 2021. Propagation and
Amplification of Local Productivity Spillovers. SSRN Electronic Journal 80. . [Crossref]
251. Gianluca Orefice, Hillel Rapoport, Gianluca Santoni. 2021. How Do Immigrants Promote Exports?
Networks, Knowledge, Diversity. SSRN Electronic Journal 64. . [Crossref]
252. Priyaranjan Jha, Antonio Rodriguez-Lopez. 2021. Minimum Wage and Firm Variety. SSRN Electronic
253. Mathias Juust. 2021. TRADE EFFECTS OF A NEGATIVE EXPORT SHOCK ON DIRECT
EXPORTERS AND WHOLESALERS. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. . [Crossref]
254. Satya Das, Vinicios Sant'Anna. 2021. Determinants of Bilateral Trade in Manufacturing and Services:
A Unified Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
255. Jiahua CHE, Wen Zhou. 2021. Reverse Selection and Crowding-In in Trade with Heterogeneous
Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
256. Vasily Korovkin, Alexey Makarin. 2021. Production Networks and War. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. .
[Crossref]
257. Andrew Wait, Vladimir Smirnov. 2021. Conditions for Efficient Entry and Clustering. SSRN
258. Michael B. Devereux, Wei Dong, Ben Tomlin. 2021. Trade Flows and Exchange Rates: Importers,
Exporters and Products. SSRN Electronic Journal 104. . [Crossref]
259. Clément Malgouyres, Thierry Mayer, Clément Mazet-Sonilhac. 2021. Who Benefits from State
Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms: Comment. SSRN
260. Christophe Benoit Gouel, Sébastien Jean. 2021. Love of Variety and Gains from Trade. SSRN
261. Zheng Han. 2021. Heterogeneous Internal Trade Cost and Its Implications in Trade. SSRN Electronic
262. Benedikt Herz, Xosé-Luís Varela-Irimia. 2020. Border effects in European public procurement.
Journal of Economic Geography 20:6, 1359-1405. [Crossref]
263. Benedikt Zoller-Rydzek, Florian Keller. 2020. COVID-19: guaranteed Loans and Zombie Firms.
CESifo Economic Studies 66:4, 322-364. [Crossref]
264. Xiaohua Yu, Hengrong Luo, Hanjie Wang, Jan-Henning Feil. 2020. Climate change and agricultural
trade in central Asia: evidence from Kazakhstan. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 6:1. . [Crossref]
265. Bin Qiu, Kuntal K. Das, W. Robert Reed. 2020. The Effect of Exchange Rates on Chinese Trade: A
Dual Margin Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56:15, 3709-3731. [Crossref]
266. Tongsheng Xu, Weiwei Li, Yulian Jiang, Ya Chen. 2020. The impact of destination tariffs on China’s
exports: Country, firm, and product perspectives. Journal of Asian Economics 71, 101246. [Crossref]
267. Gideon Ndubuisi. 2020. Fettered cross-border capital flows, external finance dependence, and
international trade. International Economics 164, 206-216. [Crossref]
268. Daniel Goya. 2020. The exchange rate and export variety: A cross-country analysis with long panel
estimators. International Review of Economics & Finance 70, 649-665. [Crossref]
269. Kyle Bagwell, Seung Hoon Lee. 2020. Trade policy under monopolistic competition with firm
selection. Journal of International Economics 127, 103379. [Crossref]
270. Simone Moriconi, Giovanni Peri, Dario Pozzoli. 2020. The role of institutions and immigrant
networks in firms’ offshoring decisions. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
53:4, 1745-1792. [Crossref]
271. Juan Lucio, Raúl Mínguez, Asier Minondo, Francisco Requena. 2020. The contribution of granular
and fundamental comparative advantage to European Union countries' export specialisation. The
World Economy 43:11, 2983-3005. [Crossref]
272. Sebastian Benz, Dorothée Rouzet, Francesca Spinelli. 2020. Firm heterogeneity in services trade:
Micro‐level evidence from eight OECD countries. The World Economy 43:11, 2905-2931. [Crossref]
273. Mahdi Ghodsi. 2020. The impact of Chinese technical barriers to trade on its manufacturing imports
when exporters are heterogeneous. Empirical Economics 59:4, 1667-1698. [Crossref]
274. Tobias Sytsma. 2020. The Impact of Hurricanes on Trade and Welfare: Evidence from US Port-level
Exports. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change 4:3, 625-655. [Crossref]
275. Colin Ward. 2020. Is the IT revolution over? An asset pricing view. Journal of Monetary Economics
114, 283-316. [Crossref]
276. Lixin Tang. 2020. Entrepreneur income inequality, aggregate saving and the gains from trade. Review
of Economic Dynamics 38, 273-295. [Crossref]
277. Fabiano Schivardi, Tom Schmitz. 2020. The IT Revolution and Southern Europe’s Two Lost
Decades. Journal of the European Economic Association 18:5, 2441-2486. [Crossref]
278. Léo Charles. Specializations in Switzerland in the Nineteenth Century: Evolution of Trade Patterns
and Growth Model 1-43. [Crossref]
279. Ayçıl YÜCER. 2020. TİCARİ ÇEKİM MODELİNDE ÇOKLU DİRENÇ FAKTÖRÜ VE
TÜRKİYE’NİN DIŞ TİCARET EĞİLİMİNİN DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 22:3, 1221-1263. [Crossref]
280. Ünal Töngür, Kemal Türkcan, Seda Ekmen-Özçelik. 2020. Logistics performance and export variety:
Evidence from Turkey. Central Bank Review 20:3, 143-154. [Crossref]
281. Fabrice Defever, José-Daniel Reyes, Alejandro Riaño, Gonzalo Varela. 2020. All these worlds are yours,
except india: The effectiveness of cash subsidies to export in nepal. European Economic Review 128,
103494. [Crossref]
282. James E. Anderson, Yoto V. Yotov. 2020. Short run gravity. Journal of International Economics 126,
103341. [Crossref]
283. Yifei Mu, Zhen Chen, Yibing Ding, Yuqing Wang, Bo Pang. 2020. How the Internet Promotes China's
Exports: A Firm‐level Perspective. China & World Economy 28:5, 118-142. [Crossref]
284. Glenn Magerman, Karolien De Bruyne, Jan Van Hove. 2020. Pecking order and core‐periphery in
international trade. Review of International Economics 28:4, 1113-1141. [Crossref]
285. Sílvia Letícia Bampi, André Filipe Zago de Azevedo, Magnus Dos Reis. 2020. O Comércio inexplorado
entre Brasil e Ásia: uma abordagem através do modelo gravitacional. Estudios económicos 37:75, 51-73.
[Crossref]
286. Mahdi Ghodsi. 2020. Is Austria’s economy locked-in in the CESEE region? Austria’s competitiveness
at the micro-level. Empirica 47:3, 669-693. [Crossref]
287. Peter H. Egger, Katharina Erhardt, Christian Keuschnigg. 2020. Heterogeneous tax sensitivity of
firm-level investments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 176, 512-538. [Crossref]
288. Theresa M. Greaney, Kozo Kiyota. 2020. The gravity model and trade in intermediate inputs. The
289. Antonio Navas, Francesco Serti, Chiara Tomasi. 2020. The role of the gravity forces on firms’ trade.
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 53:3, 1059-1097. [Crossref]
290. Lionel Fontagné, Gianluca Orefice, Roberta Piermartini. 2020. Making small firms happy? The
heterogeneous effect of trade facilitation measures. Review of International Economics 28:3, 565-598.
[Crossref]
291. Siyu Huang, Wensha Gou, Hongbo Cai, Xiaomeng Li, Qinghua Chen. 2020. Effects of Regional
Trade Agreement to Local and Global Trade Purity Relationships. Complexity 2020, 1-16. [Crossref]
292. Cheng-wei Chang, Ching-chong Lai, Ting-wei Lai. 2020. Fiscal stimulus in a simple macroeconomic
model of monopolistic competition with firm heterogeneity. The Japanese Economic Review 71:3,
447-477. [Crossref]
293. Jongrim Ha, M. Marc Stocker, Hakan Yilmazkuday. 2020. Inflation and exchange rate pass-through.
Journal of International Money and Finance 105, 102187. [Crossref]
294. Eleonora Fichera, Yevgeniya Shevtsova. 2020. Sunk exporting costs and export market coverage. The
Manchester School 88:4, 599-616. [Crossref]
295. Anca Tamaş. 2020. Why should the gravity model be taught in business education?. Proceedings of the
International Conference on Business Excellence 14:1, 422-433. [Crossref]
296. Umberto Lucia, Thomas S. Deisboeck, Giulia Grisolia. 2020. Entropy-Based Pandemics Forecasting.
Frontiers in Physics 8. . [Crossref]
297. Feifei Wu, Huaqing Wu, Xianfeng Zhang. 2020. How Does Innovation Activity Affect Firm Export
Behavior? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56:8, 1730-1751. [Crossref]
298. Kyung Hwan Baik, Sang-Kee Kim. 2020. Observable versus unobservable R&D investments in
duopolies. Journal of Economics 130:1, 37-66. [Crossref]
299. Keith W. Glaister, Nigel Driffield, Yupu Lin. 2020. Foreign Direct Investment to Africa: Is There a
Colonial Legacy?. Management International Review 60:3, 315-349. [Crossref]
300. Robert Gulotty, Xiaojun Li. 2020. Anticipating exclusion: Global supply chains and Chinese business
responses to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Business and Politics 22:2, 253-278. [Crossref]
301. Benye Shi, Tian Cai. 2020. Has China’s Oil Investment in Belt and Road Initiative Countries Helped
Its Oil Import?. Energies 13:12, 3176. [Crossref]
302. Salamat Ali. 2020. Exchange Rate Effects on Agricultural Exports: Transaction‐Level Evidence from
Pakistan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 102:3, 1020-1044. [Crossref]
303. Aksel Erbahar. 2020. Two worlds apart? Export demand shocks and domestic sales. Review of World
304. Monika Mrázová, J. Peter Neary. 2020. IO for exports(s). International Journal of Industrial
Organization 70, 102561. [Crossref]
305. Penglong Zhang. 2020. Home-biased gravity: The role of migrant tastes in international trade. World
Development 129, 104863. [Crossref]
306. Céline Carrère, Monika Mrázová, J Peter Neary. 2020. Gravity Without Apology: the Science of
Elasticities, Distance and Trade. The Economic Journal 130:628, 880-910. [Crossref]
307. Masashige Hamano, Wessel N Vermeulen. 2020. Natural disasters and trade: the mitigating impact
of port substitution. Journal of Economic Geography 20:3, 809-856. [Crossref]
308. Joseph B. Steinberg. 2020. The macroeconomic impact of NAFTA termination. Canadian Journal
of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 53:2, 821-865. [Crossref]
309. Tomohiro Ara. 2020. Country size, technology, and Ricardian comparative advantage. Review of
310. Allan Sørensen. 2020. Export promotion and intra‐industry reallocations. Review of International
311. Sophie Guilloux-Nefussi. 2020. Globalization, market structure and inflation dynamics. Journal of
312. W. Mark Brown, Afshan Dar‐Brodeur, Jesse Tweedle. 2020. Firm networks, borders, and regional
economic integration. Journal of Regional Science 60:2, 374-395. [Crossref]
313. José Ansón, Jean‐François Arvis, Mauro Boffa, Matthias Helble, Ben Shepherd. 2020. Time,
uncertainty and trade flows. The World Economy . [Crossref]
314. Ahmad Lashkaripour. 2020. Within-Industry Specialization and Global Market Power. American
Economic Journal: Microeconomics 12:1, 75-124. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
315. Gabriel Felbermayr, Alexander Sandkamp. 2020. The trade effects of anti-dumping duties: Firm-level
evidence from China. European Economic Review 122, 103367. [Crossref]
316. Daniele Curzi, Monica Schuster, Miet Maertens, Alessandro Olper. 2020. Standards, trade margins
and product quality: Firm-level evidence from Peru. Food Policy 91, 101834. [Crossref]
317. Pamela Bombarda, Stefania Marcassa. 2020. Welfare and trade elasticity with multinational
production. The World Economy 43:2, 388-411. [Crossref]
318. Frank Asche, Ivar Gaasland, Hans-Martin Straume, Erling Vårdal. 2020. Norwegian export of farmed
salmon − trade costs and market concentration. Applied Economics Letters 27:2, 145-149. [Crossref]
319. Fida Karam, Chahir Zaki. 2020. A new dawn for MENA firms: service trade liberalization for more
competitive exports. Applied Economics 52:1, 19-35. [Crossref]
320. Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen, Raoul van Maarseveen, Peter Zwaneveld. 2020. Firm heterogeneity
and exports in the Netherlands: Identifying export potential beyond firm productivity. The Journal of
321. Miriam Kohl. 2020. Redistribution, selection, and trade. Journal of International Economics 122,
103255. [Crossref]
322. Amanda Kennard. 2020. The Enemy of My Enemy: When Firms Support Climate Change
Regulation. International Organization 74:2, 187-221. [Crossref]
323. Juan R. Ferrer, Silvia Abella-Garcés, María T. Maza-Rubio. 2020. Human resource practices and
performance in small Spanish wineries, and their evolution with age and size. Ciência e Técnica
Vitivinícola 35:2, 107-119. [Crossref]
324. Hans-Martin Straume, James L. Anderson, Frank Asche, Ivar Gaasland. 2020. Delivering the Goods:
The Determinants of Norwegian Seafood Exports. Marine Resource Economics 35:1, 83-96. [Crossref]
325. Nuriye Melisa Bilgin. 2020. Production Networks and Learning-by-Networking. SSRN Electronic
326. Benedikt Zoller-Rydzek, Florian Keller. 2020. COVID-19: Guaranteed Loans and Zombie Firms.
327. Mehran Ebrahimian, Hamid Firooz. 2020. Financial Friction and Gains (Losses) from Trade. SSRN
328. Clément Malgouyres, Thierry Mayer, Clément Mazet-Sonilhac. 2020. Who Benefits from
State Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms: Comment.
329. Elias Dinopoulos, Gunnar Heins, Bulent Unel. 2020. Tariff Wars, Unemployment, and Income
Distribution. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. . [Crossref]
330. Jan Jakub Michałek. Ewolucja metod analizy skutków integracji handlowej . [Crossref]
331. Ishita Ghosh, Sukalpa Chakrabarti. Inward and Outward Foreign Investments of the Asian Economies
in Transition and India 694-719. [Crossref]
332. Tomohiro Ara, Hongyong Zhang. 2020. The Margins of Intermediate Goods Trade: Theory and
Evidence. The International Economy 23:0, 105-144. [Crossref]
333. Pawel M. Krolikowski, Andrew H. McCallum. 2020. Goods-Market Frictions and International Trade.
FEDS Notes 2020:2501. . [Crossref]
334. Gaurav Khanna, Kevin Shih, Ariel Weinberger, Mingzhi Xu, Miaojie Yu. 2020. Trade Liberalization
and Chinese Students in US Higher Education. SSRN Electronic Journal 34. . [Crossref]
335. Federico Esposito. 2020. Demand Risk and Diversification through International Trade. SSRN
336. Todd Messer. 2020. Foreign Currency as a Barrier to Trade: Evidence from Brazil. SSRN Electronic
337. Sokvibol Kea, Hua Li, Saleh Shahriar, Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi, Samnang Phoak, Tharo Touch.
2019. Factors Influencing Cambodian Rice Exports: An Application of the Dynamic Panel Gravity
Model. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55:15, 3631-3652. [Crossref]
338. Elodie Mania, Arsène Rieber. 2019. Product export diversification and sustainable economic growth
in developing countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 51, 138-151. [Crossref]
339. Chaoping Xie, Jason H. Grant, Kathryn A. Boys. 2019. Do state‐owned enterprises benefit more
from China's cereal grain tariff‐rate quota regime?. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue
canadienne d'agroeconomie 67:4, 397-416. [Crossref]
340. Kichun Kang. 2019. Changes in trade variety, substitutability, and terms of trade effect: Evidence from
south korea. The Developing Economies 57:4, 337-361. [Crossref]
341. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, John P. Bruno. 2019. Putting Canada in the penalty box: Trade
and welfare effects of eliminating North American Free Trade Agreement. The World Economy 42:12,
3488-3514. [Crossref]
342. Maria Joy V. Abrenica, Ricardo Rafael S. Guzman, Maria Socorro Gochoco-Bautista. 2019. Trade
Wars and the Disarray in the Global Trading System: Implications for the Philippines. Asian Economic
Papers 18:3, 59-75. [Crossref]
343. Joshua D. Hall. 2019. Measuring the Diffusion of Technologies Through International Trade.
International Advances in Economic Research 25:4, 445-459. [Crossref]
344. Wyatt J. Brooks, Pau S. Pujolas. 2019. GAINS FROM TRADE WITH VARIABLE TRADE
ELASTICITIES. International Economic Review 60:4, 1619-1646. [Crossref]
345. Shihui Ma, Yue Liu, Mohan Zhou. 2019. Trade, educational costs, and skill acquisition. Review of
346. Léa Marchal, Clément Nedoncelle. 2019. Immigrants, occupations and firm export performance.
347. Andreas Hatzigeorgiou, Magnus Lodefalk. 2019. Migration and servicification: Do immigrant
employees spur firm exports of services?. The World Economy 42:11, 3368-3401. [Crossref]
348. Erick Sager, Olga A. Timoshenko. 2019. The double EMG distribution and trade elasticities.
349. Ari Van Assche, Byron Gangnes. Production Switching and Vulnerability to Protectionism 69-87.
[Crossref]
350. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås. 2019. Frankel and Romer revisited. International Economics 159, 26-35.
[Crossref]
351. Matthew Smith, Sara Gorgoni, Bruce Cronin. 2019. International production and trade in a high-
tech industry: A multilevel network analysis. Social Networks 59, 50-60. [Crossref]
352. Chung-Ping A. Loh, Russell E. Triplett. 2019. International accreditation, linguistic proximity and
trade in medical services. Social Science & Medicine 238, 112403. [Crossref]
353. JEAN‐NOËL BARROT, ERIK LOUALICHE, JULIEN SAUVAGNAT. 2019. The Globalization
Risk Premium. The Journal of Finance 74:5, 2391-2439. [Crossref]
354. Saleh Shahriar, Sokvibol Kea, Lu Qian. 2019. Determinants of China’s outward foreign direct
investment in the Belt & Road economies. International Journal of Emerging Markets 15:3, 427-445.
[Crossref]
355. Annelies Van Cauwenberge, Mark Vancauteren, Roel Braekers, Sigrid Vandemaele. 2019. International
trade, foreign direct investments, and firms’ systemic risk : Evidence from the Netherlands. Economic
Modelling 81, 361-386. [Crossref]
356. Camilo Umana-Dajud. 2019. Do visas hinder international trade in goods?. Journal of Development
Economics 140, 106-126. [Crossref]
357. Wojciech W Szewerniak, Yilan Xu, Sandy Dall’erba. 2019. The effects of diesel price on regional trade
in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography 19:5, 1099-1118. [Crossref]
358. Olatunji Abdul Shobande. 2019. Effect of Economic Integration on Agricultural Export Performance
in Selected West African Countries. Economies 7:3, 79. [Crossref]
359. Milos Stepovic. 2019. GDP Growth and Health Care Expenditures Worldwide. The Open
Pharmacoeconomics & Health Economics Journal 7:1, 9-18. [Crossref]
360. Milos Stepovic. 2019. GDP Growth and Health Care Expenditures Worldwide. The Open
Pharmacoeconomics & Health Economics Journal 7:1, 21-30. [Crossref]
361. Peter Wankuru Chacha, Lawrence Edwards. 2019. Exporting to fragile states in Africa: Firm‐level
evidence. Review of Development Economics 23:3, 1177-1201. [Crossref]
362. Andrew Greenland, Mihai Ion, John Lopresti. 2019. Exports, investment and policy uncertainty.
363. Mihnea Constantinescu, Aurelija Proškutė. 2019. Firm productivity, heterogeneity and
macroeconomic dynamics: a data-driven investigation. Baltic Journal of Economics 19:2, 216-247.
[Crossref]
364. Štefan Lyócsa, Petra Vašaničová, Eva Litavcová. 2019. Interconnectedness of international tourism
demand in Europe: A cross-quantilogram network approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications 526, 120919. [Crossref]
365. Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor, Insa Flachsbarth, Amjad Masood, Bernhard Brümmer. 2019. Does
GlobalGAP certification promote agrifood exports?. European Review of Agricultural Economics 91. .
[Crossref]
366. Ana M Fernandes, Esteban Ferro, John S Wilson. 2019. Product Standards and Firms’ Export
Decisions. The World Bank Economic Review 33:2, 353-374. [Crossref]
367. Angela Cheptea, Charlotte Emlinger, Karine Latouche. 2019. Exporting firms and retail
internationalization: Evidence from France. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 28:3,
561-582. [Crossref]
368. Stefano Costa, Federico Sallusti, Claudio Vicarelli, Davide Zurlo. 2019. Over the ROC methodology:
Productivity, economic size and firms’ export thresholds. Review of International Economics 1. .
[Crossref]
369. In Song Kim, Iain Osgood. 2019. Firms in Trade and Trade Politics. Annual Review of Political Science
22:1, 399-417. [Crossref]
370. Rebecca Freeman, Samuel Pienknagura. 2019. Are all trade agreements equal? The role of distance
in shaping the effect of economic integration agreements on trade flows. Review of World Economics
155:2, 257-285. [Crossref]
371. Thibault Fally. 2019. Generalized separability and the gains from trade. Economics Letters 178, 8-12.
[Crossref]
372. Jiao Shi. 2019. Vertical FDI and exchange rates over the business cycle: The welfare implications of
openness to FDI. Journal of Development Economics 138, 274-293. [Crossref]
373. Badi H. Baltagi, Peter H. Egger, Michaela Kesina. 2019. Contagious exporting and foreign ownership:
Evidence from firms in Shanghai using a Bayesian spatial bivariate probit model. Regional Science and
Urban Economics 76, 125-146. [Crossref]
374. Andre Jungmittag. 2019. Service trade restrictiveness and internationalisation of retail trade.
International Economics and Economic Policy 16:2, 293-333. [Crossref]
375. Faqin Lin, Cui Hu, Andreas Fuchs. 2019. How do firms respond to political tensions? The
heterogeneity of the Dalai Lama Effect on trade. China Economic Review 54, 73-93. [Crossref]
376. Maria Tsiapa. 2019. Adjustment mechanisms of Greek regions in export activity during the economic
crisis of 2008–2012. Papers in Regional Science 98:2, 621-639. [Crossref]
377. Richard Sellner. 2019. Non‐discriminatory Trade Policies in Panel Structural Gravity Models:
Evidence from Monte Carlo Simulations. Review of International Economics 25. . [Crossref]
378. Aksel Erbahar. 2019. Market knowledge: Evidence from importers. The World Economy 42:4,
1110-1151. [Crossref]
379. Hege Medin. 2019. Trade barriers or trade facilitators? The heterogeneous impact of food standards
in international trade. The World Economy 42:4, 1057-1076. [Crossref]
380. Kyu Yub Lee. 2019. A Quantitative Trade Model with Unemployment. East Asian Economic Review
23:1, 27-53. [Crossref]
381. Simba Mutsvangwa, Craig R. Parsons, Nagendra Shrestha. 2019. Japan’s trade agreements aren’t
“window dressing” after all. The International Trade Journal 33:2, 176-196. [Crossref]
382. Robin Visser. 2019. The effect of the internet on the margins of trade. Information Economics and
Policy 46, 41-54. [Crossref]
383. Diego Daruich, William Easterly, Ariell Reshef. 2019. The surprising instability of export
specializations. Journal of Development Economics 137, 36-65. [Crossref]
384. Joseph B. Steinberg. 2019. Brexit and the macroeconomic impact of trade policy uncertainty. Journal
of International Economics 117, 175-195. [Crossref]
385. FLORA PANNA BIRO, LASZLO ERDEY, JOZSEF GALL, ADAM MARKUS. 2019. THE
EFFECT OF GOVERNANCE ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN LATIN AMERICA
— ISSUES OF MODEL SELECTION. Global Economy Journal 19:01. . [Crossref]
386. Peter H. Egger, Sergey Nigai, Nora M. Strecker. 2019. The Taxing Deed of Globalization. American
Economic Review 109:2, 353-390. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
387. Manoj Atolia. 2019. Trade Costs and Endogenous Nontradability in a Model with Sectoral and Firm-
Level Heterogeneity. Computational Economics 53:2, 709-742. [Crossref]
388. Alessandra Bonfiglioli, Rosario Crinò, Gino Gancia. 2019. Trade, Finance, and Endogenous Firm
Heterogeneity. Journal of the European Economic Association 17:1, 79-130. [Crossref]
389. Elisabeth Christen, Michael Pfaffermayr, Yvonne Wolfmayr. 2019. Decomposing service exports
adjustments along the intensive and extensive margin at the firm-level. Review of International
390. Eva Hasiner, Xiaohua Yu. 2019. When institutions matter: a gravity model for Chinese meat imports.
International Journal of Emerging Markets 14:1, 231-253. [Crossref]
391. Bernardo S. Blum, Sebastian Claro, Kunal Dasgupta, Ignatius J. Horstmann. 2019. Inventory
Management, Product Quality, and Cross‑Country Income Differences. American Economic Journal:
Macroeconomics 11:1, 338-388. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
392. Ana Cuadros, Joan Martín-Montaner, Jordi Paniagua. 2019. Migration and FDI: The role of job
skills. International Review of Economics & Finance 59, 318-332. [Crossref]
393. Andrea Ariu, Holger Breinlich, Gregory Corcos, Giordano Mion. 2019. The interconnections between
services and goods trade at the firm-level. Journal of International Economics 116, 173-188. [Crossref]
394. Cecilia Hammarlund, Anna Andersson. 2019. What’s in it for Africa? European Union fishing
access agreements and fishery exports from developing countries. World Development 113, 172-185.
[Crossref]
395. In Song Kim, John Londregan, Marc Ratkovic. 2019. The Effects of Political Institutions on the
Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade. International Organization 73:4, 755-792. [Crossref]
396. Eddy Bekkers, Hugo Rojas‐Romagosa. 2019. The welfare effects of free trade agreements in
quantitative trade models: A comparison of studies about Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership. The World Economy 42:1, 87-121. [Crossref]
397. Robin Visser. 2019. The effect of diplomatic representation on trade: A panel data analysis. The
398. German P. Pupato, Ben Sand, Jeanne Tschopp. 2019. Estimating the Gains From Trade in Frictional
Labor Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal 34. . [Crossref]
399. Kyu Yub Lee. 2019. A Quantitative Trade Model with Unemployment. SSRN Electronic Journal 107. .
[Crossref]
400. Brent Neiman, Joseph Vavra. 2019. The Rise of Niche Consumption. SSRN Electronic Journal 24. .
[Crossref]
401. Stephen Esaku. 2019. Export Markets and Firm Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. SSRN Electronic
402. Hamid Firooz. 2019. Trade-Induced Job Turnover and Unemployment: The Role of Variable Demand
Elasticity. SSRN Electronic Journal 83. . [Crossref]
403. Haichao Fan, Guangyu Nie, Zhiwei Xu. 2019. Market Uncertainty and International Trade. SSRN
404. Christopher M. Meissner, John P. Tang. 2018. Upstart Industrialization and Exports: Evidence from
Japan, 1880–1910. The Journal of Economic History 78:4, 1068-1102. [Crossref]
405. ANGELA ABBATE, LUCA DE BENEDICTIS, GIORGIO FAGIOLO, LUCIA TAJOLI. 2018.
Distance-varying assortativity and clustering of the international trade network. Network Science 6:4,
517-544. [Crossref]
406. Chaoping Xie, Jianfeng Gao, Jason H. Grant, Sven Anders. 2018. Examining the Canada-China agri-
food trade relationship: Firms, trading partners, and trading volumes. Canadian Journal of Agricultural
Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 66:4, 539-555. [Crossref]
407. Lionel Fontagné, Angelo Secchi, Chiara Tomasi. 2018. Exporters’ product vectors across markets.
European Economic Review 110, 150-180. [Crossref]
408. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Matthew W. Clance. 2018. Heterogeneous effects of economic
integration agreements. Journal of Development Economics 135, 587-608. [Crossref]
409. Larry D. Qiu, Mohan Zhou, Xu Wei. 2018. Regulation, innovation, and firm selection: The porter
hypothesis under monopolistic competition. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 92,
638-658. [Crossref]
410. Jianhong Qi, Zhaoyong Zhang, Hui Liu. 2018. Credit constraints and firm market entry decision:
Firm-level evidence from internationalizing Chinese multinationals. The North American Journal of
Economics and Finance 46, 272-285. [Crossref]
411. Nguyen Xuan Trung, Nguyen Duc Hung, Nguyen Thi Hien. 2018. Exploiting the Trade Potential
from Integration: Analysing the Impact of Free Trade Agreements between ASEAN and India and
China. China Report 54:4, 442-466. [Crossref]
412. Illenin O. Kondo, Logan T. Lewis, Andrea Stella. 2018. On the U.S. Firm and Establishment Size
Distributions. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018:075. . [Crossref]
413. Jing Yan. 2018. Do mergers and acquisitions promote trade? Evidence from China. The Journal of
414. Chuantian He, Chunding Li, John Whalley. 2018. General equilibrium trade modelling with Canada–
US transportation costs. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 27:7, 806-829.
[Crossref]
415. Zhi-lu SUN, Xian-de LI. 2018. The trade margins of Chinese agricultural exports to ASEAN and
their determinants. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17:10, 2356-2367. [Crossref]
416. Paras Kharel. 2018. Dissecting Gains from Trade: Changes in Welfare Cost of Autarky. East Asian
Economic Review 22:3, 275-306. [Crossref]
417. Shaista Alam. 2018. The trade integration and Pakistan’s export performance. International Journal
of Development Issues 17:3, 326-345. [Crossref]
418. David S. Jacks, Dennis Novy. 2018. Market Potential and Global Growth over the Long Twentieth
Century. Journal of International Economics 114, 221-237. [Crossref]
419. A. Kerem Coşar, Banu Demir. 2018. Shipping inside the box: Containerization and trade. Journal of
International Economics 114, 331-345. [Crossref]
420. Stephen Devadoss, Jeff Luckstead. 2018. Implications of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade
Agreement for Processed Food Markets. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne
d'agroeconomie 66:3, 415-440. [Crossref]
421. Antoine Gervais. 2018. Estimating the impact of country-level policy restrictions on services trade.
422. Costas Arkolakis, Natalia Ramondo, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Stephen Yeaple. 2018. Innovation and
Production in the Global Economy. American Economic Review 108:8, 2128-2173. [Abstract] [View
PDF article] [PDF with links]
423. Wyatt J. Brooks, Pau S. Pujolas. 2018. Capital accumulation and the welfare gains from trade. Economic
Theory 66:2, 491-523. [Crossref]
424. Massimo Del Gatto. 2018. The revealed cost competitiveness of changing trade patterns: A country-
sector exercise. International Economics 154, 3-22. [Crossref]
425. Calin-Vlad Demian, Filippo di Mauro. 2018. The exchange rate, asymmetric shocks and asymmetric
distributions. International Economics 154, 68-85. [Crossref]
426. Jens Wrona. 2018. BORDER EFFECTS WITHOUT BORDERS: WHAT DIVIDES JAPAN'S
INTERNAL TRADE?. International Economic Review 59:3, 1209-1262. [Crossref]
427. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås. 2018. What drives trade in services? Lessons from the Nordics. Applied
428. Aleksandar Stojkov, Thierry Warin. 2018. EU Membership and FDI: Is There an Endogenous
Credibility Effect?. Journal of East-West Business 24:3, 144-169. [Crossref]
429. Minyu Zhou, Ian Sheldon, Jihyun Eum. 2018. The role of intellectual property rights in seed
technology transfer through trade: evidence from U.S. field crop seed exports. Agricultural Economics
49:4, 423-434. [Crossref]
430. Céline Carrère, Maria Masood. 2018. Cultural proximity: A source of trade flow resilience?. The
431. Andrew B. Bernard, Andreas Moxnes, Karen Helene Ulltveit-Moe. 2018. Two-Sided Heterogeneity
and Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100:3, 424-439. [Crossref]
432. Sofia Gouveia, João Rebelo, Lina Lourenço-Gomes. 2018. Port wine exports: a gravity model
approach. International Journal of Wine Business Research 30:2, 218-242. [Crossref]
433. Farkhondeh Jabalameli, Ehsan Rasoulinezhad. 2018. BRICS-United Nations regional groups’ trade
patterns: a panel-gravity approach. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 11:2,
151-179. [Crossref]
434. Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2018. Global Firms.
Journal of Economic Literature 56:2, 565-619. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
435. Juan Blyde, Gonzalo Iberti, Micaela Mussini. 2018. When does innovation matter for exporting?.
Empirical Economics 54:4, 1653-1671. [Crossref]
436. Gabriele Spilker, Thomas Bernauer, In Song Kim, Helen Milner, Iain Osgood, Dustin Tingley. 2018.
Trade at the margin: Estimating the economic implications of preferential trade agreements. The
Review of International Organizations 13:2, 189-242. [Crossref]
437. Yan Dong, Chunding Li. 2018. Economic sanction games among the US, the EU and Russia: Payoffs
and potential effects. Economic Modelling 73, 117-128. [Crossref]
438. Yaghoob Jafari, Wolfgang Britz. 2018. Modelling heterogeneous firms and non-tariff measures in free
trade agreements using Computable General Equilibrium. Economic Modelling 73, 279-294. [Crossref]
439. James E. Anderson, Ingo Borchert, Aaditya Mattoo, Yoto V. Yotov. 2018. Dark costs, missing data:
Shedding some light on services trade. European Economic Review 105, 193-214. [Crossref]
440. Konstantins Benkovskis, Julia Wörz. 2018. What drives the market share changes? Price versus non-
price factors. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 45, 9-29. [Crossref]
441. Sarah Adelman, Katherine Schmeiser. 2018. Infant formula trade and the family-friendly workplace.
Applied Economics Letters 25:8, 527-530. [Crossref]
442. Robert C. Feenstra. 2018. Alternative Sources of the Gains from International Trade: Variety, Creative
Destruction, and Markups. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32:2, 25-46. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
443. Paolo Bertoletti, Federico Etro, Ina Simonovska. 2018. International Trade with Indirect Additivity.
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 10:2, 1-57. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with
links]
444. Lota D. Tamini, Zakaria Sorgho. 2018. Trade in Environmental Goods: Evidences from an Analysis
Using Elasticities of Trade Costs. Environmental and Resource Economics 70:1, 53-75. [Crossref]
445. Ignacio del Rosal. 2018. Power laws in EU country exports. Empirica 45:2, 311-337. [Crossref]
446. Robert Lundmark. 2018. Analysis and projection of global iron ore trade: a panel data gravity model
approach. Mineral Economics 31:1-2, 191-202. [Crossref]
447. Mark J. Gibson, Tim A. Graciano. 2018. Using imported intermediate goods: Selection and
technology effects. Review of International Economics 26:2, 257-278. [Crossref]
448. Anirudh Shingal, Martin Roy, Pierre Sauvé. 2018. Do WTO+ commitments in services trade
agreements reflect a quest for optimal regulatory convergence? Evidence from Asia. The World
449. ###, ###. 2018. Effect of Exchange Rate on Intensive and Extensive Margins - Evidence from Tourist
Expenditure Data. Review of International Money and Finance 8:1, 87-121. [Crossref]
450. Zakaria Sorgho, Bruno Larue. 2018. Do Geographical Indications Really Increase Trade? A Conceptual
Framework and Empirics. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 16:1. . [Crossref]
451. Dave Donaldson. 2018. Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure.
American Economic Review 108:4-5, 899-934. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
452. Juyoung Cheong, Do Won Kwak, Kam Ki Tang. 2018. The trade effects of tariffs and non-tariff
changes of preferential trade agreements. Economic Modelling 70, 370-382. [Crossref]
453. Honggue Lee. 2018. Equivalence between Increasing Returns and Comparative Advantage as the
Determinants of Intra-industry Trade: An Industry Analysis for Korea. East Asian Economic Review
22:1, 75-114. [Crossref]
454. Güzin Bayar. 2018. Estimating export equations: a survey of the literature. Empirical Economics 54:2,
629-672. [Crossref]
455. Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho, Julián P. Díaz. 2018. The new goods margin in new markets. Journal of
Comparative Economics 46:1, 78-93. [Crossref]
456. Haichao Fan, Yao Amber Li, Chen Carol Zhao. 2018. Margins of imports, forward-looking firms,
and exchange rate movements. Journal of International Money and Finance 81, 185-202. [Crossref]
457. Margherita Scoppola, Valentina Raimondi, Alessandro Olper. 2018. The impact of EU trade
preferences on the extensive and intensive margins of agricultural and food products. Agricultural
458. Robert C. Feenstra, Philip Luck, Maurice Obstfeld, Katheryn N. Russ. 2018. In Search of the
Armington Elasticity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100:1, 135-150. [Crossref]
459. Marco Bee, Stefano Schiavo. 2018. Powerless: gains from trade when firm productivity is not Pareto
distributed. Review of World Economics 154:1, 15-45. [Crossref]
460. Anders Akerman. 2018. A theory on the role of wholesalers in international trade based on economies
of scope. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 51:1, 156-185. [Crossref]
461. Kichun Kang. 2018. The effect of immigrants on the extensive and intensive margins of trade. Applied
Economics Letters 25:2, 92-95. [Crossref]
462. Mai Ngo Thi Tuyet, Ngoc Nguyen Bich. 2018. Trade Facilitation in Vietnam: Estimating The Effects
on Trade Flows. Journal of Economics and Development 69-80. [Crossref]
463. Marina Murat. 2018. Foreign education and international trade: empirical evidence from selected
Latin American countries. International Review of Applied Economics 32:1, 84-103. [Crossref]
464. Klaus Schmerler. Drivers of Medical Travel at the National Level 119-171. [Crossref]
465. Lionel Fontagné, Gianluca Orefice. 2018. Let’s try next door: Technical Barriers to Trade and multi-
destination firms. European Economic Review 101, 643-663. [Crossref]
466. Robert C. Feenstra. 2018. Restoring the product variety and pro-competitive gains from trade
with heterogeneous firms and bounded productivity. Journal of International Economics 110, 16-27.
[Crossref]
467. Festus Ebo Turkson. 2018. How well does observable trade data measure trade friction costs? Evidence
from member countries within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Journal
of African Trade 5:1-2, 69. [Crossref]
468. Costas Arkolakis, Theodore Papageorgiou, Olga A. Timoshenko. 2018. Firm learning and growth.
Review of Economic Dynamics 27, 146-168. [Crossref]
469. Andrzej Cieślik, Jan Jakub Michałek. 2018. Firm-level determinants of direct and indirect exports:
empirical evidence for C.E.E. and M.E.N.A. countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja
31:1, 982-996. [Crossref]
470. Everett B. Peterson, Jason H. Grant, Jeta Rudi‐Polloshka. 2018. Survival of the Fittest: Export
Duration and Failure into United States Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Markets. American Journal of
471. Olim Latipov, Christine McDaniel, Simon Schropp. 2018. The de minimis threshold in international
trade: The costs of being too low. The World Economy 41:1, 337-356. [Crossref]
472. Antoine Berthou, Emmanuel Dhyne. 2018. Exchange Rate Movements, Firm-Level Exports and
Heterogeneity. SSRN Electronic Journal 104. . [Crossref]
473. Van Pham, Mauro Caselli, Alan D. Woodland. 2018. Multinational Suppliers: Are They Different
from Exporters?. SSRN Electronic Journal 97. . [Crossref]
474. Honggue Lee. 2018. Equivalence between Increasing Returns and Comparative Advantage as the
Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade: An Industry Analysis for Korea. SSRN Electronic Journal 100. .
[Crossref]
475. Fabiano Schivardi, Tom Schmitz. 2018. The IT Revolution and Southern Europe's Two Lost
Decades. SSRN Electronic Journal 130. . [Crossref]
476. Aksel Erbahar. 2018. Two Worlds Apart? Export Demand Shocks and Domestic Sales. SSRN
477. Lionel Artige, Alexandre Reginster. 2018. On the Stylized Fact of the Firm Size Distribution. SSRN
478. Ulrich Schetter, Oriol Tejada. 2018. Globalization and the Concentration of Talent. SSRN Electronic
479. Paras Kharel. 2018. Dissecting Gains from Trade: Changes in Welfare Cost of Autarky. SSRN
480. Jihyun Eum, Jinho Park, Moon Jung Choi. 2018. #### ### ####(Trade and Labor Demand of Firms).
481. Frode Steen, Richard Friberg, Simen Ulsaker. 2018. Hump-shaped Cross-price Effects and the
Extensive Margin in Cross-border Shopping. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
482. Ana Fernandes, Peter Klenow, Sergii Meleshchuk, Martha Denisse Pierola, Andres Rodriguez-Clare.
2018. The Intensive Margin in Trade. IMF Working Papers 18:259, 1. [Crossref]
483. Yang Yang. 2018. Transport Infrastructure, City Productivity Growth and Sectoral Reallocation:. IMF
Working Papers 18:276, 1. [Crossref]
484. Florin Cucu, Ludovic Panon. 2018. Asylum Policies, International Tensions and Trade Flows:
Evidence From the EU. SSRN Electronic Journal 100. . [Crossref]
485. Kirill Borusyak, Xavier Jaravel. 2018. The Distributional Effects of Trade: Theory and Evidence from
the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal 126. . [Crossref]
486. Paul S. Segerstrom, Ignat Stepanok. 2018. Learning How To Export. The Scandinavian Journal of
487. Sujin Jang, E. Young Song. 2017. Gravity with Intermediate Goods Trade. East Asian Economic Review
21:4, 295-315. [Crossref]
488. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, Giray Gozgor, Chi Keung Marco Lau. 2017. Institutions and gravity model:
the role of political economy and corporate governance. Eurasian Business Review 7:3, 421-436.
[Crossref]
489. Mahfuz Kabir, Ruhul Salim, Nasser Al-Mawali. 2017. The gravity model and trade flows: Recent
developments in econometric modeling and empirical evidence. Economic Analysis and Policy 56, 60-71.
[Crossref]
490. Kichun Kang. 2017. Identifying the dispersion of the Pareto productivity distribution in international
trade. Economics Letters 161, 108-111. [Crossref]
491. Sushanta Mallick, Helena Marques. 2017. Export prices, selection into exporting and market size:
Evidence from China and India. International Business Review 26:6, 1034-1050. [Crossref]
492. Chunding Li, John Whalley. 2017. How close is Asia already to being a trade bloc?. Journal of
Comparative Economics 45:4, 847-864. [Crossref]
493. Holger Görg, Philipp Henze, Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol, Daniel Kopasker, Hassan Molana, Catia
Montagna, Fredrik Sjöholm. 2017. Firm size distribution and employment fluctuations: Theory and
evidence. Research in Economics 71:4, 690-703. [Crossref]
494. Federico Etro. 2017. Research in economics and monopolistic competition. Research in Economics
71:4, 645-649. [Crossref]
495. Tongsheng Xu, Xiao Liang. 2017. Measuring aggregate trade costs and its empirical effects on
manufacturing export composition in China. China Finance and Economic Review 5:1. . [Crossref]
496. Greg Morrison, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Michele Imbruno, Omar Alonso Doria Arrieta, Armando Rungi,
Massimo Riccaboni, Fabio Pammolli. 2017. On Economic Complexity and the Fitness of Nations.
Scientific Reports 7:1. . [Crossref]
497. Keith Head, Barbara J. Spencer. 2017. Oligopoly in international trade: Rise, fall and resurgence.
498. Mark J. Gibson, Jeff Luckstead. 2017. Coupled Vs. Decoupled Subsidies with Heterogeneous Firms
in General Equilibrium. Journal of Applied Economics 20:2, 271-282. [Crossref]
499. Sena Kimm Gnangnon. 2017. Impact of trade facilitation reforms on tax revenue. Journal of Economic
Studies 44:5, 765-780. [Crossref]
500. Hang T. Nguyen, Olga A. Timoshenko. 2017. Entry assumptions and welfare gains from trade.
Economics Letters 159, 104-107. [Crossref]
501. Karyne B. Charbonneau. 2017. Multiple fixed effects in binary response panel data models. The
Econometrics Journal 20:3, S1-S13. [Crossref]
502. Kyle Handley, Nuno Limão. 2017. Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for
China and the United States. American Economic Review 107:9, 2731-2783. [Abstract] [View PDF
article] [PDF with links]
503. Pol Antràs, Teresa C. Fort, Felix Tintelnot. 2017. The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and
Evidence from US Firms. American Economic Review 107:9, 2514-2564. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
504. Karsten Mau. 2017. US policy spillover(?) – China’s accession to the WTO and rising exports to the
EU. European Economic Review 98, 169-188. [Crossref]
505. Katharina Erhardt. 2017. On home market effects and firm heterogeneity. European Economic Review
98, 316-340. [Crossref]
506. Maria Bas, Thierry Mayer, Mathias Thoenig. 2017. From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and
heterogeneity in the trade elasticity. Journal of International Economics 108, 1-19. [Crossref]
507. Xiaoheng Zhang, Yingheng Zhou, Xianhui Geng, Xu Tian. 2017. The Intensive and Extensive
Margins of China's Agricultural Trade. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne
d'agroeconomie 65:3, 431-451. [Crossref]
508. Thi Anh-Dao Tran, Minh Hong Phi, Diadié Diaw. 2017. Export diversification and real exchange rate
in emerging Latin America and Asia: A South–North vs. South-South decomposition. The Journal
of International Trade & Economic Development 26:6, 649-676. [Crossref]
509. Timothy J. Kehoe, Pau S. Pujolàs, Jack Rossbach. 2017. Quantitative Trade Models: Developments
and Challenges. Annual Review of Economics 9:1, 295-325. [Crossref]
510. Erik van der Marel. 2017. Explaining Export Performance through Inputs: Evidence from Aggregated
Cross-country Firm-level Data. Review of Development Economics 21:3, 731-755. [Crossref]
511. Eliav Danziger. 2017. Skill acquisition and the dynamics of trade-induced inequality. Journal of
512. Faqin Lin, Wenshou Yan, Xiaosong Wang. 2017. The impact of Africa-China's diplomatic visits on
bilateral trade. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 64:3, 310-326. [Crossref]
513. Jiangyong Lu, Yi Lu, Yi Sun, Zhigang Tao. 2017. Intermediaries, Firm Heterogeneity and Exporting
Behaviour. The World Economy 40:7, 1381-1404. [Crossref]
514. Federica DeMaria, Sophie Drogue. 2017. EU Trade Regulation for Baby Food: Protecting Health or
Trade?. The World Economy 40:7, 1430-1453. [Crossref]
515. Wanling Chen, Chi Keung Marco Lau, David Boansi, Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin. 2017. Effects of trade
cost on the textile and apparel market: evidence from Asian countries. The Journal of The Textile
Institute 108:6, 971-986. [Crossref]
516. Pamela J. Smith, Erik S. Katovich. 2017. Are GMO Policies “Trade Related”? Empirical Analysis of
Latin America. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 39:2, 286-312. [Crossref]
517. Rishav Bista, Rebecca Tomasik. 2017. Time Zone Effect and the Margins of Exports. The World
518. Per Botolf Maurseth, Hege Medin. 2017. Market-specific Sunk Export Costs: The Impact of
Learning and Spillovers. The World Economy 40:6, 1105-1127. [Crossref]
519. Myoung-jae Lee. 2017. Extensive and Intensive Margin Effects in Sample Selection Models: Racial
Effects on Wages. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 180:3, 817-839.
[Crossref]
520. Hege Medin. 2017. The reverse home-market effect in exports: a cross-country study of the extensive
margin of exports. Review of World Economics 153:2, 301-325. [Crossref]
521. Scott French. 2017. Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for?. Journal of International
522. Hiroyuki Nishiyama. 2017. The effect of exchange rate fluctuation on intra-industry reallocation in a
firm heterogeneity model with trade and foreign direct investment. The Quarterly Review of Economics
and Finance 64, 32-43. [Crossref]
523. Jing Yan. 2017. Privatisation and trade performance: evidence from China. Asian-Pacific Economic
Literature 31:1, 66-78. [Crossref]
524. Wilhelm Kohler, Benjamin Jung. 2017. Wie vorteilhaft ist internationaler Handel?. Perspektiven der
Wirtschaftspolitik 18:1, 32-55. [Crossref]
525. Catherine Thomas. Trade or Multinational Production? Consumer Preferences and Multiproduct
Firms 49-85. [Crossref]
526. Tim Kelly, Aleksandra Liaplina, Shawn W. Tan, Hernan Winkler. Digital Trade 117-150. [Crossref]
527. Felipa de Mello-Sampayo. 2017. Testing competing destinations gravity models – evidence from BRIC
International. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 26:3, 277-294. [Crossref]
528. Gang Wu, Yue Pu, Xing Yao, Yumei Jiang, Wenjun Du. 2017. Multiple Margins of China's
Export Growth: A Two-Mode Network Dynamic Analysis. Canadian Public Policy 43:S2, S57-S71.
[Crossref]
529. Stefano Costa, Carmine Pappalardo, Claudio Vicarelli. 2017. Internationalization choices and Italian
firm performance during the crisis. Small Business Economics 48:3, 753-769. [Crossref]
530. Juyoung Cheong, Do Won Kwak, Haishan Yuan. 2017. Trade to aid: EU's temporary tariff waivers
for flood-hit Pakistan. Journal of Development Economics 125, 70-88. [Crossref]
531. Michael Huberman, Christopher M. Meissner, Kim Oosterlinck. 2017. Technology and Geography in
the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade. The Journal of Economic
History 77:1, 39-89. [Crossref]
532. Marianne Matthee, Maria Santana-Gallego. 2017. Identifying the determinants of South Africa’s
extensive and intensive trade margins: A gravity model approach. South African Journal of Economic
and Management Sciences 20:1. . [Crossref]
533. Maria Cipollina, David Laborde Debucquet, Luca Salvatici. 2017. The tide that does not raise all
boats: an assessment of EU preferential trade policies. Review of World Economics 153:1, 199-231.
[Crossref]
534. Felix Tintelnot. 2017. Global Production with Export Platforms*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics
132:1, 157-209. [Crossref]
535. Tibor Besedeš, Matthew T. Cole. 2017. Distorted Trade Barriers: A Dissection of Trade Costs in a
“Distorted Gravity” Model. Review of International Economics 25:1, 148-164. [Crossref]
536. Carmine Pappalardo, Claudio Vicarelli. 2017. Euro introduction and the behaviour of Italian exporting
firms. Oxford Economic Papers 22, gpw068. [Crossref]
537. Somesh K. Mathur, Rahul Arora, Sarbjit Singh, Amrita Roy. Developments in International Trade
Theory and Gravity Modelling 9-35. [Crossref]
538. Somesh K. Mathur, Sarbjit Singh, Gaurav Doshi, Abhishek Srivastava. Trade Growth Accounting in
Goods and Services: An Empirical Exercise 101-113. [Crossref]
539. Sergey Nigai. 2017. A tale of two tails: Productivity distribution and the gains from trade. Journal of
540. Tomohiro Hirano, Noriyuki Yanagawa. 2017. Asset Bubbles, Endogenous Growth, and Financial
Frictions. The Review of Economic Studies 84:1, 406-443. [Crossref]
541. Laura Alfaro, Maggie Xiaoyang Chen. 2017. Transportation Cost and the Geography of Foreign
Investment. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
542. Aksel Erbahar. 2017. Market Knowledge: Evidence from Importers. SSRN Electronic Journal 6. .
[Crossref]
543. Ching-mu Chen, Shin-Kun Peng, Wen-Jen Tsay. 2017. Estimating Disparity in Welfare Gains from
Trade between Firm Owners and Workers. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
544. Stefano Bolatto, Marco Grazzi, Chiara Tomasi. 2017. Export Intermediaries and Adjustments to
Exchange Rate Movements. SSRN Electronic Journal 84. . [Crossref]
545. D E Kuznetsov, Alexander Knobel. 2017. (Determinants of Entering the Export Markets and Behavior
of Russian Firms in International Trade). SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
546. Juyoung Cheong, Do Wan Kwak, Kam Ki Tang. 2017. The Trade Effects of Tariffs and Non-Tariff
Changes of Preferential Trade Agreements. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
547. Seyed Ali Madanizadeh. 2017. Trade, Skill Premium and Endogenous Firm Organization. SSRN
548. Simon Galle, Andres Rodriguez-Clare, Moises Yi. 2017. Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate
and Distributional Effects of Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
549. Pao-Li Chang, Tomoki Fujii, Wei Jin. 2017. Does 'America First' Help America? The Impact of
Country Image on Exports and Welfare. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
550. Ahmad Lashkaripour, Volodymyr Lugovskyy. 2017. National Differentiation and Industry-Wide
Scale Effects. SSRN Electronic Journal 134. . [Crossref]
551. Wyatt Brooks, Pau Pujolas. 2017. Capital Accumulation and the Welfare Gains from Trade. SSRN
552. Andreas Hatzigeorgiou, Magnus Lodefalk. 2016. Migrants’ Influence on Firm-level Exports. Journal
of Industry, Competition and Trade 16:4, 477-497. [Crossref]
553. Cui Hu, Yong Tan. 2016. Export spillovers and export performance in China. China Economic Review
41, 75-89. [Crossref]
554. Farrukh Suvankulov. 2016. Revisiting national border effects in foreign trade in goods of Canadian
provinces. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 25:8, 1045-1070. [Crossref]
555. Joseph S. Shapiro. 2016. Trade Costs, CO2, and the Environment. American Economic Journal:
Economic Policy 8:4, 220-254. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
556. Subhajit Chakrabarty, Biswajit Nag, Pinaki Dasgupta, Siddhartha K. Rastogi. 2016. Determinants and
Relationships in Sectoral Trade: A Bilateral Model for Knitwear Clothing. Thunderbird International
Business Review 58:6, 565-574. [Crossref]
557. Michael E. Waugh, B. Ravikumar. 2016. Measuring openness to trade. Journal of Economic Dynamics
and Control 72, 29-41. [Crossref]
558. Jose Asturias, Sewon Hur, Timothy J. Kehoe, Kim J. Ruhl. 2016. The interaction and sequencing of
policy reforms. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 72, 45-66. [Crossref]
559. Alessandra Bonfiglioli. 2016. Comments on “Liquidity constrained exporters” by T. Chaney. Journal
of Economic Dynamics and Control 72, 155-158. [Crossref]
560. . The Breadth of Globalization and Distance 119-158. [Crossref]
561. Raul SERRANO, Isabel ACERO, Marta FERNANDEZ-OLMOS. 2016. Networks and export
performance of agri-food firms: New evidence linking micro and macro determinants. Agricultural
Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 62:10, 459-470. [Crossref]
562. Natalia Ramondo, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Milagro Saborío-Rodríguez. 2016. Trade, Domestic
Frictions, and Scale Effects. American Economic Review 106:10, 3159-3184. [Abstract] [View PDF
article] [PDF with links]
563. José A.F. Machado, J.M.C. Santos Silva, Kehai Wei. 2016. Quantiles, corners, and the extensive margin
of trade. European Economic Review 89, 73-84. [Crossref]
564. Lauren Bresnahan, Ian Coxhead, Jeremy Foltz, Tewodaj Mogues. 2016. Does Freer Trade Really Lead
to Productivity Growth? Evidence from Africa. World Development 86, 18-29. [Crossref]
565. Charles Regnacq, Ariel Dinar, Ellen Hanak. 2016. The Gravity of Water: Water Trade Frictions in
California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98:5, 1273-1294. [Crossref]
566. Jeff Luckstead, Stephen Devadoss. 2016. Impacts of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership on Processed Food Trade under Monopolistic Competition and Firm Heterogeneity.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98:5, 1389-1402. [Crossref]
567. Andrew J. Cassey, Katherine N. Schmeiser, Andreas Waldkirch. 2016. Exporting Spatial Externalities.
Open Economies Review 27:4, 697-720. [Crossref]
568. Sushanta Mallick, Helena Marques. 2016. Does quality differentiation matter in exporters' pricing
behaviour? Comparing China and India. China Economic Review 40, 71-90. [Crossref]
569. Timothy J. Kehoe, Pau S. Pujolàs, Kim J. Ruhl. 2016. The opportunity costs of entrepreneurs in
international trade. Economics Letters 146, 1-3. [Crossref]
570. Grigorios Spanos. 2016. Organization and export performance. Economics Letters 146, 130-134.
[Crossref]
571. Sushanta Mallick, Helena Marques. 2016. Pricing strategy of emerging market exporters in alternate
currency regimes: The role of comparative advantage. International Review of Economics & Finance
45, 68-81. [Crossref]
572. Matthias Helble, Boon-Loong Ngiang. 2016. From global factory to global mall? East Asia’s changing
trade composition and orientation. Japan and the World Economy 39, 37-47. [Crossref]
573. Xavier Gabaix, David Laibson, Deyuan Li, Hongyi Li, Sidney Resnick, Casper G. de Vries. 2016.
The impact of competition on prices with numerous firms. Journal of Economic Theory 165, 1-24.
[Crossref]
574. Jan I. Haaland, Anthony J. Venables. 2016. Optimal trade policy with monopolistic competition and
heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics 102, 85-95. [Crossref]
575. Andrew J. Cassey. 2016. The Destinations of State Trade Missions. CESifo Economic Studies 62:3,
547-571. [Crossref]
576. Holger Breinlich, Alejandro Cuñat. 2016. Tariffs, Trade and Productivity: A Quantitative Evaluation
of Heterogeneous Firm Models. The Economic Journal 126:595, 1660-1702. [Crossref]
577. Abhishek Gaurav, Somesh K. Mathur. 2016. Determinants of Trade Costs and Trade Growth
Accounting between India and the European Union during 1995-2010. The World Economy 39:9,
1399-1413. [Crossref]
578. Aslihan Atabek Demirhan. 2016. To be exporter or not to be exporter? Entry–exit dynamics of
Turkish manufacturing firms. Empirical Economics 51:1, 181-200. [Crossref]
579. Sébastien Jean, Jean-Christophe Bureau. 2016. Do regional trade agreements really boost trade?
Evidence from agricultural products. Review of World Economics 152:3, 477-499. [Crossref]
580. Matthieu Crozet, Emmanuel Milet, Daniel Mirza. 2016. The impact of domestic regulations on
international trade in services: Evidence from firm-level data. Journal of Comparative Economics 44:3,
585-607. [Crossref]
581. Hyun-Hoon Lee, John Ries. 2016. Aid for Trade and Greenfield Investment. World Development 84,
206-218. [Crossref]
582. Anna Andersson. 2016. Export Performance and Access to Intermediate Inputs: The Case of Rules
of Origin Liberalisation. The World Economy 39:8, 1048-1079. [Crossref]
583. Jeremiás Máté Balogh. 2016. A földrajzi távolság, a kulturális hasonlóság és a szabadkereskedelem
hatása a borkereskedelemre. Közgazdasági Szemle 63:7-8, 858-881. [Crossref]
584. Luis Castro, Ben G. Li, Keith E. Maskus, Yiqing Xie. 2016. Fixed Export Costs and Export Behavior.
Southern Economic Journal 83:1, 300-320. [Crossref]
585. Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch. 2016. Gravity with unemployment. Journal of International Economics
101, 70-85. [Crossref]
586. Dudley Cooke. 2016. Optimal monetary policy with endogenous export participation. Review of
Economic Dynamics 21, 72-88. [Crossref]
587. Mario Larch, Wolfgang Lechthaler. 2016. BUY NATIONAL AND THE BUSINESS CYCLE.
Macroeconomic Dynamics 20:5, 1196-1218. [Crossref]
588. JEAN-FRANÇOIS ARVIS, YANN DUVAL, BEN SHEPHERD, CHORTHIP UTOKTHAM,
ANASUYA RAJ. 2016. Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996–2010. World Trade Review 15:3,
451-474. [Crossref]
589. Altan Aldan, Olcay Yücel Çulha. 2016. The role of the extensive margin in export of Turkey: A
comparative analysis. Central Bank Review 16:2, 59-64. [Crossref]
590. Qian Xuefeng, Mahmut Yaşar. 2016. Export Market Diversification and Firm Productivity: Evidence
from a Large Developing Country. World Development 82, 28-47. [Crossref]
591. Lota D. Tamini, Maurice Doyon, Rodrigue Simon. 2016. Analyzing Trade Liberalization Effects in
the Egg Sector Using a Dynamic Gravity Model. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue
canadienne d'agroeconomie 64:2, 383-411. [Crossref]
592. Dieter Pennerstorfer. 2016. Export, Migration and Costs of Trade: Evidence from Central European
Firms. Regional Studies 50:5, 848-863. [Crossref]
593. Dongwen Tian, Na Hu, Xin Wang, Li Huang. 2016. Trade margins, quality upgrading, and China’s
agri-food export growth. China Agricultural Economic Review 8:2. . [Crossref]
594. Alan Spearot. 2016. Unpacking the Long-Run Effects of Tariff Shocks: New Structural Implications
from Firm Heterogeneity Models. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8:2, 128-167.
[Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
595. Péter Harasztosi. 2016. Export spillovers in Hungary. Empirical Economics 50:3, 801-830. [Crossref]
596. Yuko Imura. 2016. Endogenous trade participation with price rigidities. Journal of International
597. Natalie Chen, Luciana Juvenal. 2016. Quality, trade, and exchange rate pass-through. Journal of
598. James E. Anderson, Mykyta Vesselovsky, Yoto V. Yotov. 2016. Gravity with scale effects. Journal of
599. Dave Donaldson, Richard Hornbeck. 2016. Railroads and American Economic Growth: A “Market
Access” Approach *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131:2, 799-858. [Crossref]
600. Achim Schmillen. 2016. The Exporter Wage Premium Reconsidered-Destinations, Distances and
Linked Employer-Employee Data. Review of Development Economics 20:2, 531-546. [Crossref]
601. Rishav Bista, Josh Ederington, Jenny Minier, Brandon J. Sheridan. 2016. Austerity and Exports.
602. Stefano Bolatto, Massimo Sbracia. 2016. Deconstructing the Gains from Trade: Selection of Industries
vs Reallocation of Workers. Review of International Economics 24:2, 344-363. [Crossref]
603. Cécile Bastidon, Yusuf Kocoglu. 2016. Accès au financement et dynamique des exportations des
pays MENA méditerranéens. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du
développement 37:2, 178-196. [Crossref]
604. Ben Shepherd. 2016. Did APEC's Trade Facilitation Action Plans deliver the goods?. Journal of Asian
605. Zheng Jiang, Huimin Shi. 2016. The selection of firms based on productivity: different roles of entry
and overhead cost. Economic Modelling 54, 537-544. [Crossref]
606. Kwok Tong Soo. 2016. Intra‐industry trade: A Krugman–Ricardo Model and Data. Economica 83:330,
338-355. [Crossref]
607. Juyoung Cheong, Do Won Kwak, Kam Ki Tang. 2016. The distance effects on the intensive and
extensive margins of trade over time. Empirical Economics 50:2, 253-278. [Crossref]
608. Emanuele Bacchiega, Antonio Minniti, Arsen Palestini. 2016. Quality, distance and trade: A strategic
approach. Papers in Regional Science 95, S165-S191. [Crossref]
609. Jean-François Arvis, Ben Shepherd. 2016. Measuring Connectivity in a Globally Networked Industry:
The Case of Air Transport. The World Economy 39:3, 369-385. [Crossref]
610. Pierre Sauvé, Anirudh Shingal. 2016. Why Do Economies Enter into Preferential Agreements on
Trade in Services? Assessing the Potential for Negotiated Regulatory Convergence in Asian Services
Markets. Asian Development Review 33:1, 56-73. [Crossref]
611. Desislava Dikova, Andreja Jaklič, Anže Burger, Aljaž Kunčič. 2016. What is beneficial for first-time
SME-exporters from a transition economy: A diversified or a focused export-strategy?. Journal of
World Business 51:2, 185-199. [Crossref]
612. Costas Arkolakis. 2016. A Unified Theory of Firm Selection and Growth *. The Quarterly Journal
of Economics 131:1, 89-155. [Crossref]
613. Kenneth S. Chan, Miaojie Yu. 2016. Introduction to the Special Issue of China's Growing Trade and
its Role to the World Economy. Pacific Economic Review 21:1, 32-34. [Crossref]
614. Robert C. Feenstra. 2016. Gains from Trade Under Monopolistic Competition. Pacific Economic
Review 21:1, 35-44. [Crossref]
615. Concepción Betrán, Michael Huberman. 2016. International competition in the first wave of
globalization: new evidence on the margins of trade. The Economic History Review 69:1, 258-287.
[Crossref]
616. Yoke Fong Kong, Richard Kneller. 2016. Measuring the Impact of China's Export Growth on its
Asian Neighbours. The World Economy 39:2, 195-220. [Crossref]
617. Priya Ranjan, Jibonayan Raychaudhuri. The “New-New” Trade Theory: A Review of the Literature
3-21. [Crossref]
618. N. Limão. Preferential Trade Agreements 279-367. [Crossref]
619. María Santana-Gallego, Francisco J. Ledesma-Rodríguez, Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez. 2016.
International trade and tourism flows: An extension of the gravity model. Economic Modelling 52,
1026-1033. [Crossref]
620. Ron Alquist, Rahul Mukherjee, Linda Tesar. 2016. Fire-sale FDI or business as usual?. Journal of
621. Scott French. 2016. The composition of trade flows and the aggregate effects of trade barriers. Journal
of International Economics 98, 114-137. [Crossref]
622. Antoine Berthou, Lionel Fontagné. 2016. Variable Trade Costs, Composition Effects and the Intensive
Margin of Trade. The World Economy 39:1, 54-71. [Crossref]
623. Maria Persson, Fredrik Wilhelmsson. 2016. EU Trade Preferences and Export Diversification. The
624. Jun-Hyung Ko, Akeyoshi Matsuzaki. 2016. The Geography of Gravity. SSRN Electronic Journal 54. .
[Crossref]
625. Raffaello Bronzini. 2016. Bank Internationalization and Firm Exports: Evidence from Matched Firm-
Bank Data. SSRN Electronic Journal 126. . [Crossref]
626. Pol Antras, Teresa Fort, Felix Tintelnot. 2016. The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence
from U.S. Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 97. . [Crossref]
627. Andrew Greenland, Mihai Ion, John Lopresti. 2016. Exports, Investment and Policy Uncertainty.
628. Yulin Hou, Yun Wang. 2016. Gravity Channels in Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
629. Yang Yang. 2016. Transport Infrastructure, City Productivity Growth and Industry Reallocation:
Evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal 83. . [Crossref]
630. Marnix Amand, Florian Pelgrin. 2016. Pareto Distributions in International Trade: Hard to Identify,
Easy to Estimate. SSRN Electronic Journal 119. . [Crossref]
631. John Bound, Gaurav Khanna, Nicolas Morales. 2016. Understanding the Economic Impact of the
H-1B Program on the U.S. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
632. Faqin Lin, Cui Hu. 2016. How Do Firms Respond to Political Tensions? The Heterogeneity of the
Dalai Lama Effect on Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 84. . [Crossref]
633. Sophie Guilloux-Nefussi. 2016. Globalization, Market Structure and Inflation Dynamics. SSRN
634. Meredith mname Startz. 2016. The Value of Face-to-Face: Search and Contracting Problems in
Nigerian Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 84. . [Crossref]
635. Lota D. Tamini, Houssem Eddine Chebbi, Abdessalem Abbassi. 2016. Trade Performance and
Potential of North African Countries: An Application of a Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. SSRN
636. Lota D. Tamini, Zakaria Sorgho. 2016. Trade in Environmental Goods: How Important Are Trade
Costs Elasticities?. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
637. Ishita Ghosh, Sukalpa Chakrabarti. Inward and Outward Foreign Investments of the Asian Economies
in Transition and India 212-237. [Crossref]
638. Matthias Helble, Boon-Loong Ngiang. The Changing Nature of the Production Network in East
Asia 67-86. [Crossref]
639. Jana Šimáková, Daniel Stavárek. 2016. An Empirical Sector-Specific Gravity Model for Hungarian
International Trade. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63:6,
2145-2150. [Crossref]
640. Patrik Karpaty, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall. 2015. Service Offshoring and Corruption: Do Firms
Escape Corrupt Countries?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 15:4, 363-381. [Crossref]
641. Jing Wang, Hyun Hoon Lee, Kyung Tae Kim, Dong Hyun Park. 2015. Firm and Product
Heterogeneity in China's Automotive Exports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 31:4,
449-457. [Crossref]
642. Arman Mazhikeyev, T. Huw Edwards, Marian Rizov. 2015. Openness and isolation: The trade
performance of the former Soviet Central Asian countries. International Business Review 24:6, 935-947.
[Crossref]
643. Pascal Mossay, Takatoshi Tabuchi. 2015. Preferential Trade Agreements Harm Third Countries. The
Economic Journal 125:589, 1964-1985. [Crossref]
644. Eliane Choquette, Philipp Meinen. 2015. Export Spillovers: Opening the Black Box. The World
645. Andreas Hatzigeorgiou, Magnus Lodefalk. 2015. Trade, Migration and Integration - Evidence and
Policy Implications. The World Economy 38:12, 2013-2048. [Crossref]
646. ANDREW JIA-YI KAM. 2015. DETERMINANTS OF INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTION
FRAGMENTATION: MALAYSIA’S EXPERIENCE IN THE INFORMATION,
COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS (ICT) INDUSTRY. The Singapore
Economic Review 60:05, 1550042. [Crossref]
647. Kyle Handley, Nuno Limão. 2015. Trade and Investment under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm
Evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7:4, 189-222. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
648. Gabriel Felbermayr, Benjamin Jung, Mario Larch. 2015. The welfare consequences of import tariffs:
A quantitative perspective. Journal of International Economics 97:2, 295-309. [Crossref]
649. Anne-Célia Disdier, Lionel Fontagné, Mondher Mimouni. 2015. Tariff Liberalization and Trade
Integration of Emerging Countries. Review of International Economics 23:5, 946-971. [Crossref]
650. Eugene Bempong Nyantakyi, Steven Husted, Shuichiro Nishioka. 2015. Trade Frictions and Market
Access of Developing Countries: A Product-level Empirical Investigation. Review of International
651. Christian Hepenstrick, Alexander Tarasov. 2015. Per capita income and the extensive margin of
bilateral trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 48:4, 1561-1599.
[Crossref]
652. Johannes Van Biesebroeck, Emily Yu, Shenjie Chen. 2015. The impact of trade promotion services on
Canadian exporter performance. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 48:4,
1481-1512. [Crossref]
653. Chris Edmond, Virgiliu Midrigan, Daniel Yi Xu. 2015. Competition, Markups, and the Gains from
International Trade. American Economic Review 105:10, 3183-3221. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
654. Ina Simonovska. 2015. Income Differences and Prices of Tradables: Insights from an Online Retailer.
The Review of Economic Studies 82:4, 1612-1656. [Crossref]
655. Michael Jetter, Andrés Ramírez Hassan. 2015. WANT EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION?
EDUCATE THE KIDS FIRST. Economic Inquiry 53:4, 1765-1782. [Crossref]
656. Alfonso Irarrazabal, Andreas Moxnes, Luca David Opromolla. 2015. The Tip of the Iceberg: A
Quantitative Framework for Estimating Trade Costs. Review of Economics and Statistics 97:4, 777-792.
[Crossref]
657. Lionel Fontagné, Gianluca Orefice, Roberta Piermartini, Nadia Rocha. 2015. Product standards and
margins of trade: Firm-level evidence. Journal of International Economics 97:1, 29-44. [Crossref]
658. Thibault Fally. 2015. Structural gravity and fixed effects. Journal of International Economics 97:1,
76-85. [Crossref]
659. Antoine Gervais. 2015. Product quality and firm heterogeneity in international trade. Canadian
660. Karine Latouche, Emmanuelle Chevassus-Lozza. 2015. Retailer Supply Chain and Market Access:
Evidence From French Agri-food Firms Certified with Private Standards. The World Economy 38:8,
1312-1334. [Crossref]
661. Dave Donaldson. 2015. The Gains from Market Integration. Annual Review of Economics 7:1, 619-647.
[Crossref]
662. Rafael Cezar. 2015. The gravity of financial development. The Journal of International Trade &
Economic Development 24:5, 696-723. [Crossref]
663. Jordi Paniagua, Erik Figueiredo, Juan Sapena. 2015. Quantile regression for the FDI gravity equation.
Journal of Business Research 68:7, 1512-1518. [Crossref]
664. Cecília Hornok, Miklós Koren. 2015. Administrative barriers to trade. Journal of International
Economics 96, S110-S122. [Crossref]
665. Wei Liao, Ana Maria Santacreu. 2015. The trade comovement puzzle and the margins of international
trade. Journal of International Economics 96:2, 266-288. [Crossref]
666. Hirokazu Ishise, Miwa Matsuo. 2015. TRADE IN POLARIZED AMERICA: THE BORDER
EFFECT BETWEEN RED STATES AND BLUE STATES. Economic Inquiry 53:3, 1647-1670.
[Crossref]
667. Tomohiko Inui, Keiko Ito, Daisuke Miyakawa. 2015. OVERSEAS MARKET INFORMATION
AND FIRMS' EXPORT DECISIONS. Economic Inquiry 53:3, 1671-1688. [Crossref]
668. Peter H. Egger, Katharina Erhardt, Andrea Lassmann. 2015. Productivity and R&D as Drivers of
Exports and Domestic Sales: Semi-parametric Evidence from French Firm-level Data. The World
669. Bassem Kahouli, Samir Maktouf. 2015. The determinants of FDI and the impact of the economic
crisis on the implementation of RTAs: A static and dynamic gravity model. International Business
670. Michele Battisti, Filippo Belloc, Massimo Del Gatto. 2015. Unbundling Technology Adoption and
tfp at the Firm Level: Do Intangibles Matter?. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 24:2,
390-414. [Crossref]
671. Antoine Gervais. 2015. Product quality, firm heterogeneity and trade liberalization. The Journal of
672. Ivan Cherkashin, Svetlana Demidova, Hiau Looi Kee, Kala Krishna. 2015. Firm heterogeneity and
costly trade: A new estimation strategy and policy experiments. Journal of International Economics
96:1, 18-36. [Crossref]
673. Christian Hepenstrick, Alexander Tarasov. 2015. Trade Openness and Cross-country Income
Differences. Review of International Economics 23:2, 271-302. [Crossref]
674. Laura Hering, Rodrigo Paillacar. 2015. Does Access to Foreign Markets Shape Internal Migration?
Evidence from Brazil. The World Bank Economic Review 91, lhv028. [Crossref]
675. Meixin Guo, Huiran Pan. 2015. Can cross-listing relax financial frictions in trade and equity holdings?
A sector-level analysis. Applied Economics 47:19, 2012-2029. [Crossref]
676. Faqin Lin. 2015. Estimating the effect of the Internet on international trade. The Journal of
677. Ariel Burstein, Javier Cravino. 2015. Measured Aggregate Gains from International Trade. American
Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7:2, 181-218. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
678. Olga A. Timoshenko. 2015. Product switching in a model of learning. Journal of International
679. Katharina Eck, Martina Engemann, Monika Schnitzer. 2015. How trade credits foster exporting.
Review of World Economics 151:1, 73-101. [Crossref]
680. Julian di Giovanni, Andrei A. Levchenko, Francesc Ortega. 2015. A GLOBAL VIEW OF CROSS-
BORDER MIGRATION. Journal of the European Economic Association 13:1, 168-202. [Crossref]
681. Soojae Moon. 2015. The Losses from Trade Restrictions: Policy Dynamics with Firm Selection and
Endogenous Markup. Review of International Economics 23:1, 86-110. [Crossref]
682. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Matthew W. Clance. Preliminary examination of heterogeneous
effects on international trade of economicintegration agreements 355-373. [Crossref]
683. Gabriel Felbermayr, Volker Grossmann, Wilhelm Kohler. Migration, International Trade, and Capital
Formation 913-1025. [Crossref]
684. W. Mark Brown, William P. Anderson. 2015. How thick is the border: the relative cost of Canadian
domestic and cross-border truck-borne trade, 2004–2009. Journal of Transport Geography 42, 10-21.
[Crossref]
685. L. Caliendo, F. Parro. 2015. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA. The Review of
Economic Studies 82:1, 1-44. [Crossref]
686. Anne-Célia Disdier, Lionel Fontagné, Olivier Cadot. 2015. North-South Standards Harmonization
and International Trade. The World Bank Economic Review 29:2, 327-352. [Crossref]
687. Jana Šimáková, Daniel Stavárek. 2015. An Empirical Sector-Specific Gravity Model for Hungarian
International Trade. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63:6,
2145-2150. [Crossref]
688. João M. C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro, Frank Windmeijer. 2015. Testing Competing Models for
Non-negative Data with Many Zeros. Journal of Econometric Methods 4:1. . [Crossref]
689. Joseph S. Shapiro, Reed Walker. 2015. Why is Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing Declining? The
Roles of Trade, Regulation, Productivity, and Preferences. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
690. Yao Amber Li, Chen Carol Zhao. 2015. Expected Exchange Rate Movement and Forward-Looking
Importers. SSRN Electronic Journal 122. . [Crossref]
691. Joseph S. Shapiro, Reed Walker. 2015. Why is Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing Declining? The
Roles of Trade, Regulation, Productivity, and Preferences. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
692. Sophie Guilloux-Nefussi. 2015. Globalization, Market Structure and the Flattening of the Phillips
Curve. SSRN Electronic Journal XLII. . [Crossref]
693. Sophie Guilloux-Nefussi. 2015. Globalization, Market Structure and the Flattening of the Phillips
Curve. SSRN Electronic Journal XLII. . [Crossref]
694. Yao Amber Li, Juanyi (Jenny) Xu, Chen Zhao. 2015. Import Response to Exchange Rate Fluctuations:
A Micro-Level Investigation. SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
695. Antoine Berthou, Lionel Fontagne. 2015. Variable Trade Costs, Composition Effects, and the Intensive
Margin of Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
696. Juliana Araujo, Povilas Lastauskas, Chris Papageorgiou. 2015. Evolution of Bilateral Capital Flows to
Developing Countries at Intensive and Extensive Margins. SSRN Electronic Journal 90. . [Crossref]
697. Jose Sanchez-Gutierrez, Juan Mejia-Trejo, Elsa Georgina Gonzalez-Uribe. 2015. The
Internationalization Process and the Competitiveness in Manufacturing SMEs. SSRN Electronic
698. Sophie Soete, Jan Van Hove. 2015. Dissecting the Trade Effects of Europe's Economic Integration
Agreements. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
699. Antoine Gervais. 2015. The Impact of Policy Restrictions on Services Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal
3. . [Crossref]
700. Alimamy Kamara. 2015. Regional Trade Agreements and Bilateral Trade: An Eclectic View of the
Hidden Trade Costs. SSRN Electronic Journal 63. . [Crossref]
701. Yao Amber Li, Juanyi (Jenny) Xu, Chen Carol Zhao. 2015. Import Response to Exchange Rate
Fluctuations: A Micro-Level Investigation. SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
702. Jan Heufer, Per Hjertstrand. 2015. Homothetic Efficiency and Test Power: A Non-Parametric
Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
703. Maria Bas, Thierry Mayer, Mathias Thoenig. 2015. From Micro to Macro: Demand, Supply, and
Heterogeneity in the Trade Elasticity. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
704. Carlos-Enrique Cardoso-Vargas. 2015. Productivity, Size and Exporting Dynamics of Firms: Evidence
for Mexico. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
705. Jan Simon Schymik. 2015. Trade, Technologies, and the Evolution of Corporate Governance. SSRN
706. S. Miroudot, Ben Shepherd. 2015. Regional Trade Agreements and Trade Costs in Services. SSRN
707. Hunt Allcott, Daniel Keniston. 2015. Dutch Disease or Agglomeration? The Local Economic Effects
of Natural Resource Booms in Modern America. SSRN Electronic Journal 113. . [Crossref]
708. Jiao Shi. 2015. Vertical FDI and Exchange Rates Over the Business Cycle: The Welfare Implications
of Openness to FDI. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
709. Stefano Bolatto, Massimo Sbracia. 2015. Deconstructing the Gains from Trade: Selection of Industries
vs. Reallocation of Workers. SSRN Electronic Journal 54. . [Crossref]
710. Ho Yeol Lim, Jangho Choi, Ho-Kyung Bang, So Jeong Im, Junyoung Kim, Xianping Zhu, Hualin
Jin, Eunlee Joung. 2015. (Determining Factors and the Effects of Trade on Economic Growth in
North Korea). SSRN Electronic Journal 3. . [Crossref]
711. Douglas R. Nelson. Migration and Networks 141-164. [Crossref]
712. Takayuki Mizuno, Wataru Souma, Tsutomu Watanabe. Buyer-Supplier Networks and Aggregate
Volatility 15-37. [Crossref]
713. E. Young Song. 2014. Trade Finance and Trade Collapse during the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence
from the Republic of Korea. East Asian Economic Review 18:4, 395-423. [Crossref]
714. Francesco Serti, Chiara Tomasi. 2014. Export and import market-specific characteristics. Empirical
715. Andrea Fracasso. 2014. A gravity model of virtual water trade. Ecological Economics 108, 215-228.
[Crossref]
716. M. Riccaboni, S. Schiavo. 2014. Stochastic trade networks. Journal of Complex Networks 2:4, 537-556.
[Crossref]
717. Rossana Mastrandrea, Tiziano Squartini, Giorgio Fagiolo, Diego Garlaschelli. 2014. Reconstructing
the world trade multiplex: The role of intensive and extensive biases. Physical Review E 90:6. .
[Crossref]
718. Sébastien Miroudot, Ben Shepherd. 2014. The Paradox of ‘Preferences’: Regional Trade Agreements
and Trade Costs in Services. The World Economy 37:12, 1751-1772. [Crossref]
719. Alex Sander Souza do Carmo, Maurício Vaz Lobo Bittencourt. 2014. O efeito da volatilidade da taxa
de câmbio sobre o comércio internacional: uma investigação empírica sob a ótica da margem extensiva.
Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) 44:4, 815-845. [Crossref]
720. Thomas Chaney. 2014. The Network Structure of International Trade. American Economic Review
104:11, 3600-3634. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
721. Ina Charlotte Jäkel. 2014. Import-push or export-pull? An industry-level analysis of the impact of
trade on firm exit. Empirica 41:4, 747-775. [Crossref]
722. Filippo di Mauro, Francesco Pappadà. 2014. Euro area external imbalances and the burden of
adjustment. Journal of International Money and Finance 48, 336-356. [Crossref]
723. George Alessandria, Horag Choi. 2014. Do falling iceberg costs explain recent U.S. export growth?.
Journal of International Economics 94:2, 311-325. [Crossref]
724. Yves Bourdet, Maria Persson. 2014. Expanding and Diversifying South Mediterranean Exports
through Trade Facilitation. Development Policy Review 32:6, 675-699. [Crossref]
725. Kristian Behrens, Giordano Mion, Yasusada Murata, Jens Südekum. 2014. TRADE, WAGES, AND
PRODUCTIVITY. International Economic Review 55:4, 1305-1348. [Crossref]
726. Nuria Gallego, Carlos Llano. 2014. The Border Effect and the Nonlinear Relationship between Trade
and Distance. Review of International Economics 22:5, 1016-1048. [Crossref]
727. Treb Allen. 2014. Information Frictions in Trade. Econometrica 82:6, 2041-2083. [Crossref]
728. Jakob R. Munch, Daniel X. Nguyen. 2014. Decomposing firm-level sales variation. Journal of
Economic Behavior & Organization 106, 317-334. [Crossref]
729. MARK J. McCABE, CHRISTOPHER M. SNYDER. 2014. IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF
OPEN ACCESS ON CITATIONS USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE JOURNALS. Economic Inquiry
52:4, 1284-1300. [Crossref]
730. Dimitri Bellas, Vincent Vicard. 2014. French Firms' Exports During Downturns: Evidence from Past
Crises. The World Economy 37:10, 1410-1423. [Crossref]
731. Ioannis K. Dassios, Grigoris Kalogeropoulos. 2014. On the stability of equilibrium for a reformulated
foreign trade model of three countries. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 10:3. . [Crossref]
732. Kyle Handley. 2014. Exporting under trade policy uncertainty: Theory and evidence. Journal of
733. Ana P. Fernandes, Heiwai Tang. 2014. Learning to export from neighbors. Journal of International
734. Loris Rubini. 2014. Innovation and the trade elasticity. Journal of Monetary Economics 66, 32-46.
[Crossref]
735. Bo Xiong, Sixia Chen. 2014. Estimating gravity equation models in the presence of sample selection
and heteroscedasticity. Applied Economics 46:24, 2993-3003. [Crossref]
736. Justin Caron, Thibault Fally, James R. Markusen. 2014. International Trade Puzzles: A Solution
Linking Production and Preferences *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129:3, 1501-1552.
[Crossref]
737. Chang-Tai Hsieh, Peter J. Klenow. 2014. The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico *. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics 129:3, 1035-1084. [Crossref]
738. Treb Allen, Costas Arkolakis. 2014. Trade and the Topography of the Spatial Economy *. The
739. Li-juan Yang. Harmonized standards, heterogeneous firms and dual margins of China's export growth
833-844. [Crossref]
740. JaeBin Ahn. 2014. A welfare analysis of unilateral trade and FDI liberalization. Canadian Journal of
Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 47:3, 758-774. [Crossref]
741. Philipp J. H. Schröder, Allan Sørensen. 2014. A Welfare Ranking of Multilateral Reductions in
Real and Tariff Trade Barriers when Firms are Heterogenous. Review of International Economics 22:3,
423-443. [Crossref]
742. Nicholas Sheard. 2014. Learning to Export and the Timing of Entry to Export Markets. Review of
743. Martina Lawless, Karl Whelan. 2014. Where Do Firms Export, How Much and Why?. The World
744. Takayuki Mizuno, Wataru Souma, Tsutomu Watanabe. 2014. The Structure and Evolution of Buyer-
Supplier Networks. PLoS ONE 9:7, e100712. [Crossref]
745. Laura Márquez-Ramos, Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso. 2014. Trade in intermediate goods and Euro-
Med production networks. Middle East Development Journal 6:2, 215-231. [Crossref]
746. Julian di Giovanni, Andrei A. Levchenko, Jing Zhang. 2014. The Global Welfare Impact of China:
Trade Integration and Technological Change. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 6:3,
747. Scott L. Baier, Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Michael Feng. 2014. Economic integration agreements and the
margins of international trade. Journal of International Economics 93:2, 339-350. [Crossref]
748. Holger Breinlich. 2014. Heterogeneous firm-level responses to trade liberalization: A test using stock
price reactions. Journal of International Economics 93:2, 270-285. [Crossref]
749. F. Rauch. 2014. Cities as spatial clusters. Journal of Economic Geography 14:4, 759-773. [Crossref]
750. BO XIONG, JOHN BEGHIN. 2014. DISENTANGLING DEMAND-ENHANCING AND
TRADE-COST EFFECTS OF MAXIMUM RESIDUE REGULATIONS. Economic Inquiry 52:3,
1190-1203. [Crossref]
751. Armando J. Garcia Pires. 2014. Beyond Trade Costs: Firms’ Endogenous Access to International
Markets. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 14:2, 229-257. [Crossref]
752. Kai Xu. 2014. Barriers to labor mobility and international trade: The case of China. China Economic
Review 29, 107-125. [Crossref]
753. ###, Soonchan Park. 2014. The Impact of Monetary Policy on the Foreign Exchange Rate: An
Empirical Evidence from Korea. KUKJE KYUNGJE YONGU 20:2, 49-70. [Crossref]
754. Kazunobu Hayakawa, Fukunari Kimura, Kaoru Nabeshima. 2014. Nonconventional Provisions in
Regional Trade Agreements: Do They Enhance International Trade?. Journal of Applied Economics
17:1, 113-137. [Crossref]
755. J.M.C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro, Kehai Wei. 2014. Estimating the extensive margin of trade.
756. Robert C. Feenstra, John Romalis. 2014. International Prices and Endogenous Quality *. The
757. Joel Rodrigue. 2014. Multinational production, exports and aggregate productivity. Review of
Economic Dynamics 17:2, 243-261. [Crossref]
758. Keisaku Higashida, Shunsuke Managi. 2014. Determinants of trade in recyclable wastes: evidence from
commodity-based trade of waste and scrap. Environment and Development Economics 19:2, 250-270.
[Crossref]
759. Erik van der Marel, Iana Dreyer. 2014. Beyond Dutch disease. Economics of Transition 22:2, 341-364.
[Crossref]
760. Ari Kokko, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall. 2014. Distance, Transaction Costs, and Preferences in
European Trade. The International Trade Journal 28:2, 87-120. [Crossref]
761. Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman. 2014. Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises. American
Economic Review 104:3, 793-831. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
762. Mariya Aleksynska, Giovanni Peri. 2014. Isolating the Network Effect of Immigrants on Trade. The
763. Harald Badinger, Kemal Türkcan. 2014. Currency Unions, Export Margins, and Product
Differentiation: An Empirical Assessment for European Monetary Union. Review of International
764. Chunding Li, John Whalley. 2014. China and the Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Numerical Simulation
Assessment of the Effects Involved. The World Economy 37:2, 169-192. [Crossref]
765. Juan S. Blyde. What It Takes to Join an International Value Chain: The Firm-Level Evidence 75-104.
[Crossref]
766. Marc J. Melitz, Stephen J. Redding. Heterogeneous Firms and Trade 1-54. [Crossref]
767. Pol Antràs, Stephen R. Yeaple. Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade 55-130.
[Crossref]
768. Keith Head, Thierry Mayer. Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook 131-195.
[Crossref]
769. Arnaud Costinot, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the
Consequences of Globalization 197-261. [Crossref]
770. Ina Simonovska, Michael E. Waugh. 2014. The elasticity of trade: Estimates and evidence. Journal of
771. Lawrence Edwards, Rhys Jenkins. 2014. The margins of export competition: A new approach to
evaluating the impact of China on South African exports to Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Policy
Modeling 36, S132-S150. [Crossref]
772. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Ram Mudambi. MNEs as Border-Crossing Multi-location Enterprises: The Role
of Discontinuities in Geographic Space 8-34. [Crossref]
773. Ermias Weldemicael. 2014. Technology, Trade Costs and Export Sophistication. The World Economy
37:1, 14-41. [Crossref]
774. Dimitri Bellas, Vincent Vicard. 2014. French Firms Exports During Downturns: Evidence from Past
Crises. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
775. Cletus C. Coughlin. 2014. Determinants of Trade Margins: Insights Using State Export Data. SSRN
776. Pushan Dutt, Ana Maria Santacreu, Daniel A. Traca. 2014. The Gravity of Experience. SSRN
777. Abel M. Mateus. 2014. Development Theory and Globalization, the Second Wave: A
Reinterpretation. SSRN Electronic Journal 60. . [Crossref]
778. Fatima Olanike Kareem, Idowu Olayinka Kareem. 2014. Specification and Estimation of Gravity
Models: A Review of the Issues in the Literature. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
779. Laura Hering, Rodrigo Paillacar. 2014. Does Access to Foreign Markets Shape Internal Migration?
Evidence from Brazil. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
780. Ana Fernandes, Heiwai Tang. 2014. Learning to Export from Neighbors. SSRN Electronic Journal
43. . [Crossref]
781. Alyson C. Ma, Ari Van Assche. 2014. Vertical Specialization, Tariff Shirking and Trade. SSRN
782. Matthias Carl Helble, Boon-Loong Ngiang. 2014. From Global Factory to Global Mall: East Asia's
Changing Trade Composition. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
783. Matthias Carl Helble. 2014. The Pacific's Connectivity and Its Trade Implications. SSRN Electronic
784. Kim Joseph Ruhl, Jonathan L. Willis. 2014. New Exporter Dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal 88. .
[Crossref]
785. Jan I. Haaland, Anthony J. Venables. 2014. Optimal Trade Policy with Monopolistic Competition
and Heterogeneous Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
786. Jan Heufer, Per Hjertstrand. 2014. Homothetic Efficiency. SSRN Electronic Journal 13. . [Crossref]
787. Pol Antras, Teresa Fort, Felix Tintlenot. 2014. The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence
from U.S. Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 97. . [Crossref]
788. Andrés Artal-Tur, Vicente Pallardó-López, Francisco Requena-Silvente. Immigrants’ Networks,
Distance, and Trade Creation Effects: An Study Employing Province-Level Data for Italy, Spain and
Portugal 3-18. [Crossref]
789. Armando Silva, Oscar Afonso, Ana Paula Africano. 2013. Economic performance and international
trade engagement: the case of Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Economics and Economic
Policy 10:4, 521-547. [Crossref]
790. Bruce A. Blonigen, Wesley W. Wilson. 2013. The growth and patterns of international trade.
Maritime Policy & Management 40:7, 618-635. [Crossref]
791. Alberto Behar, Philip Manners, Benjamin D. Nelson. 2013. Exports and International Logistics*.
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 75:6, 855-886. [Crossref]
792. Wataru Johdo. 2013. Corporate Tax Reductions, Cross-Border Ownership and Welfare. Japanese
793. Pushan Dutt, Ilian Mihov, Timothy Van Zandt. 2013. The effect of WTO on the extensive and the
intensive margins of trade. Journal of International Economics 91:2, 204-219. [Crossref]
794. Yi Lu, Zhigang Tao, Yan Zhang. 2013. How do exporters respond to antidumping investigations?.
795. Matthieu Crozet, Federico Trionfetti. 2013. Firm-level comparative advantage. Journal of International
796. Kristie Briggs. 2013. Institutional quality as a barrier to trade. Applied Economics Letters 20:16,
1453-1458. [Crossref]
797. Xuebing Yang. 2013. The relative importance of distance in restricting international trade. Applied
Economics Letters 20:17, 1548-1552. [Crossref]
798. Keith Head, Thierry Mayer. 2013. What separates us? Sources of resistance to globalization. Canadian
799. Sebastian Krautheim. 2013. Export‐supporting FDI. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne
800. Amit K. Khandelwal,, Peter K. Schott,, Shang-Jin Wei. 2013. Trade Liberalization and Embedded
Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. American Economic Review 103:6, 2169-2195.
[Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
801. Andrew J. Cassey, Katherine N. Schmeiser. 2013. The agglomeration of exporters by destination. The
Annals of Regional Science 51:2, 495-513. [Crossref]
802. Iza Lejárraga, Peter Walkenhorst. 2013. Economic policy, tourism trade and productive diversification.
International Economics 135-136, 1-12. [Crossref]
803. Mario Larch, Wolfgang Lechthaler. 2013. Whom to send to Doha? The shortsighted ones!. Review
of Economic Dynamics 16:4, 634-649. [Crossref]
804. SÉBASTIEN MIROUDOT, JEHAN SAUVAGE, BEN SHEPHERD. 2013. Measuring the cost of
international trade in services. World Trade Review 12:4, 719-735. [Crossref]
805. Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, Sami Bensassi. 2013. THE PRICE OF MODERN MARITIME
PIRACY. Defence and Peace Economics 24:5, 397-418. [Crossref]
806. Rinaldo Brau, Anna Maria Pinna. 2013. Movements of People for Movements of Goods?. The World
807. Juan Carlos Hallak, Jagadeesh Sivadasan. 2013. Product and process productivity: Implications for
quality choice and conditional exporter premia. Journal of International Economics 91:1, 53-67.
[Crossref]
808. Rasyad A. Parinduri, Shandre M. Thangavelu. 2013. Trade liberalization, free trade agreements, and
the value of firms: Stock market evidence from Singapore. The Journal of International Trade &
Economic Development 22:6, 924-941. [Crossref]
809. Olivier Cadot, Céline Carrère, Vanessa Strauss-Kahn. 2013. TRADE DIVERSIFICATION,
INCOME, AND GROWTH: WHAT DO WE KNOW?. Journal of Economic Surveys 27:4, 790-812.
[Crossref]
810. Maria Persson. 2013. Trade facilitation and the extensive margin. The Journal of International Trade
& Economic Development 22:5, 658-693. [Crossref]
811. Jürgen Meckl, Benjamin Weigert. 2013. Occupational Choice, Aggregate Productivity, and Trade.
Review of Development Economics 17:3, 549-558. [Crossref]
812. Benjamin Bridgman. 2013. Market entry and trade weighted import costs. Canadian Journal of
Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 46:3, 982-1013. [Crossref]
813. Emmanuelle Chevassus-Lozza, Carl Gaigné, Léo Le Mener. 2013. Does input trade liberalization
boost downstream firms' exports? Theory and firm-level evidence. Journal of International Economics
90:2, 391-402. [Crossref]
814. CHRIS MILNER, DANNY McGOWAN. 2013. TRADE COSTS AND TRADE
COMPOSITION. Economic Inquiry 51:3, 1886-1902. [Crossref]
815. Mark Vancauteren. 7 The Role of EU Harmonization in Explaining the Export-Productivity Premium
of Food Processing Firms 165-185. [Crossref]
816. Hyun-Hoon Lee, Donghyun Park, Jing Wang. 2013. Different types of firms, different types of
products, and their dynamics: An anatomy of China's imports. China Economic Review 25, 62-77.
[Crossref]
817. Katherine N. Schmeiser. 2013. The firm export and FDI choice in the context of gravity. International
Review of Economics & Finance 27, 592-596. [Crossref]
818. Joseph Francois, Miriam Manchin. 2013. Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade. World Development
46, 165-175. [Crossref]
819. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Ram Mudambi. 2013. MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The
role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies 44:5, 413-426.
[Crossref]
820. C. C. Coughlin, D. Novy. 2013. Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic Border
Effect? Evidence from US Trade. CESifo Economic Studies 59:2, 249-276. [Crossref]
821. C. Arkolakis, M.-A. Muendler. 2013. Exporters and Their Products: A Collection of Empirical
Regularities. CESifo Economic Studies 59:2, 223-248. [Crossref]
822. J. H. Bergstrand. 2013. Measuring the Effects of Endogenous Policies on Economic Integration.
CESifo Economic Studies 59:2, 199-222. [Crossref]
823. Fernando Ferreira, Joel Waldfogel. 2013. Pop Internationalism: Has Half a Century of World Music
Trade Displaced Local Culture?. The Economic Journal 123:569, 634-664. [Crossref]
824. Seema Sangita. 2013. The Effect of Diasporic Business Networks on International Trade Flows.
825. Wei-Chih Chen. 2013. The Extensive and Intensive Margins of Exports: The Role of Innovation.
The World Economy 36:5, 607-635. [Crossref]
826. Daniel Berger,, William Easterly,, Nathan Nunn,, Shanker Satyanath. 2013. Commercial
Imperialism? Political Influence and Trade During the Cold War. American Economic Review 103:2,
827. Ariel Burstein,, Javier Cravino,, Jonathan Vogel. 2013. Importing Skill-Biased Technology. American
Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5:2, 32-71. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
828. Fernando Parro. 2013. Capital-Skill Complementarity and the Skill Premium in a Quantitative Model
of Trade. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5:2, 72-117. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
829. Raphael A. Auer, Kathrin Degen, Andreas M. Fischer. 2013. Low-wage import competition,
inflationary pressure, and industry dynamics in Europe. European Economic Review 59, 141-166.
[Crossref]
830. Julian di Giovanni, Andrei A. Levchenko. 2013. Firm entry, trade, and welfare in Zipf's world. Journal
of International Economics 89:2, 283-296. [Crossref]
831. Dennis Novy. 2013. International trade without CES: Estimating translog gravity. Journal of
832. Jiandong Ju, Li Su. 2013. Market structure in the Chinese steel industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of
Accounting & Economics 20:1, 70-84. [Crossref]
833. Francesc Ortega, Giovanni Peri. 2013. The effect of income and immigration policies on international
migration. Migration Studies 1:1, 47-74. [Crossref]
834. Gal Hochman, Chrysostomos Tabakis, David Zilberman. 2013. The impact of international trade on
institutions and infrastructure. Journal of Comparative Economics 41:1, 126-140. [Crossref]
835. Yan Zhou, Jiadong Tong, Puyang Sun. 2013. What's special about the extensive and intensive margins
in Chinese manufacturing exports?. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 6:1, 19-34.
[Crossref]
836. Russell Hillberry, David Hummels. Trade Elasticity Parameters for a Computable General
Equilibrium Model 1213-1269. [Crossref]
837. Armando Silva, Oscar Afonso, Ana Paula Africano. 2013. ¿Las empresas más productivas se
autoseleccionan para exportar? Aplicación de una prueba para el caso de Portugal. Investigación
Económica 72:283, 135-161. [Crossref]
838. Andrea Finicelli, Patrizio Pagano, Massimo Sbracia. 2013. Ricardian selection. Journal of International
839. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Peter Egger, Mario Larch. 2013. Gravity Redux: Estimation of gravity-equation
coefficients, elasticities of substitution, and general equilibrium comparative statics under asymmetric
bilateral trade costs. Journal of International Economics 89:1, 110-121. [Crossref]
840. Richard Fabling, Arthur Grimes, Lynda Sanderson. 2013. Any port in a storm: Impacts of new port
infrastructure on exporter behaviour. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation
841. DENNIS NOVY. 2013. GRAVITY REDUX: MEASURING INTERNATIONAL TRADE COSTS
WITH PANEL DATA. Economic Inquiry 51:1, 101-121. [Crossref]
842. Xuebing Yang. 2013. The Relative Importance of Distance in Restricting International Trade. SSRN
843. Lionel Fontagne, Gianluca Orefice, Roberta Piermartini, Nadia Rocha. 2013. Product Standards and
Margins of Trade: Firm Level Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal 98. . [Crossref]
844. Lionel Fontagne, Gianluca Orefice, Roberta Piermartini, Nadia Rocha. 2013. Product Standards and
Margins of Trade: Firm Level Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal 98. . [Crossref]
845. Luciana Juvenal, Paulo Santos Monteiro. 2013. Export Market Diversification and Productivity
Improvements: Theory and Evidence from Argentinean Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 88. .
[Crossref]
846. Mark J. McCabe, Christopher M. Snyder. 2013. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer: The
Effect of Open Access on Cites to Science Journals Across the Quality Spectrum. SSRN Electronic
847. Loren Brandt, Peter Morrow. 2013. Tariffs and the Organization of Trade in China. SSRN Electronic
848. Konstantins Benkovskis, Julia Wörz. 2013. What Drives the Market Share Changes? Price versus
Non-Price Factors. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
849. Julian di Giovanni, Andrei A. Levchenko, Jing Zhang. 2013. The Global Welfare Impact of China:
Trade Integration and Technological Change. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
850. Bart J. Bronnenberg. 2013. The Provision of Convenience and Variety by the Market. SSRN Electronic
851. Povilas Lastauskas. 2013. Europe's Revolving Doors: Import Competition and Endogenous Firm
Entry Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal 24. . [Crossref]
852. Haichao Fan, Edwin L.-C. Lai, Han Steffan Qi. 2013. A Model of Trade with Ricardian Comparative
Advantage and Intra-Sectoral Firm Heterogeneity. SSRN Electronic Journal 97. . [Crossref]
853. Povilas Lastauskas. 2013. Europe's Revolving Doors: Import Competition and Endogenous Firm
Entry Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal 24. . [Crossref]
854. Tomohiro Hirano, Noriyuki Yanagawa. 2013. Asset Bubbles, Endogenous Growth, and Financial
Frictions. SSRN Electronic Journal 114. . [Crossref]
855. Fernando Leibovici. 2013. Financial Development and International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal
94. . [Crossref]
856. Maria Persson, Fredrik Wilhelmsson. 2013. EU Trade Preferences and Export Diversification. SSRN
857. Charles Ackah, Festus Ebo Turkson, Kwadwo Opoku. 2013. Measuring Trade Costs in Economic
Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Modern Economy 04:01, 56-65. [Crossref]
858. Akira Sasahara. 2013. A Theory of Gains from New Imported Inputs. The International Economy
16:0, 37-57. [Crossref]
859. Henk L. M. Kox. Export Decisions of Services Firms Between Agglomeration Effects and Market-
Entry Costs 177-201. [Crossref]
860. Yi Lu, Zhigang Tao, Yan Zhang. 2013. How Do Exporters Respond to Antidumping Investigations?.
861. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Peter Egger. Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy
532-570. [Crossref]
862. Irene Brambilla,, Daniel Lederman,, Guido Porto. 2012. Exports, Export Destinations, and Skills.
American Economic Review 102:7, 3406-3438. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
863. H. Tang, Y. Zhang. 2012. Exchange Rates and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Chinese
Exporters. CESifo Economic Studies 58:4, 671-702. [Crossref]
864. Peter Egger, Valeria Merlo. 2012. BITs Bite: An Anatomy of the Impact of Bilateral Investment
Treaties on Multinational Firms*. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114:4, 1240-1266.
[Crossref]
865. Maria Persson. 2012. From Trade Preferences to Trade Facilitation: Taking Stock of the Issues.
Economics 6:1. . [Crossref]
866. José de Sousa, Thierry Mayer, Soledad Zignago. 2012. Market access in global and regional trade.
Regional Science and Urban Economics 42:6, 1037-1052. [Crossref]
867. Tomohiro Machikita, Yasushi Ueki. 2012. The geographic extent of global supply chains: evidence
from Southeast Asia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 26:2, 72-87. [Crossref]
868. Massimiliano Bratti, Giulia Felice. 2012. Are Exporters More Likely to Introduce Product
Innovations?. The World Economy 35:11, 1559-1598. [Crossref]
869. Juan Blyde, Gonzalo Iberti. 2012. Trade Costs, Resource Reallocation and Productivity in Developing
Countries. Review of International Economics 20:5, 909-923. [Crossref]
870. Stefanie A. Haller. 2012. Intra‐firm trade, exporting, importing, and firm performance. Canadian
871. Francesco Serti, Chiara Tomasi. 2012. Self selection among different export markets. Economics Letters
117:1, 102-105. [Crossref]
872. E. Young Song, Chen Zhao. 2012. Does Specialization Matter for Trade Imbalance at Industry Level?.
East Asian Economic Review 16:3, 227-247. [Crossref]
873. Andrés Artal-Tur, Vicente J. Pallardó-López, Francisco Requena-Silvente. 2012. The trade-enhancing
effect of immigration networks: New evidence on the role of geographic proximity. Economics Letters
116:3, 554-557. [Crossref]
874. Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2012. The Empirics of
Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade. Annual Review of Economics 4:1, 283-313. [Crossref]
875. Maksim Belenkiy, David Riker. 2012. Face-to-Face Exports. Journal of Travel Research 51:5, 632-639.
[Crossref]
876. Kristian Behrens, Cem Ertur, Wilfried Koch. 2012. ‘DUAL’ GRAVITY: USING SPATIAL
ECONOMETRICS TO CONTROL FOR MULTILATERAL RESISTANCE. Journal of Applied
Econometrics 27:5, 773-794. [Crossref]
877. Hartmut Egger, Peter Egger, James R. Markusen. 2012. INTERNATIONAL WELFARE AND
EMPLOYMENT LINKAGES ARISING FROM MINIMUM WAGES*. International Economic
878. Pierre-Louis Vézina. 2012. How migrant networks facilitate trade: Evidence from Swiss exports. Swiss
Journal of Economics and Statistics 148:3, 449-476. [Crossref]
879. Oscar Afonso, Armando Silva. 2012. Non-scale endogenous growth effects of subsidies for exporters.
Economic Modelling 29:4, 1248-1257. [Crossref]
880. Gábor Békés, Balázs Muraközy. 2012. Temporary trade and heterogeneous firms. Journal of
881. Paulo Bastos, Joana Silva. 2012. Networks, firms, and trade. Journal of International Economics 87:2,
352-364. [Crossref]
882. Paul R. Bergin, Ching-Yi Lin. 2012. The dynamic effects of a currency union on trade. Journal of
883. NATALIE CHEN, DENNIS NOVY. 2012. On the measurement of trade costs: direct vs. indirect
approaches to quantifying standards and technical regulations. World Trade Review 11:3, 401-414.
[Crossref]
884. MARIE-AGNÈS JOUANJEAN. 2012. Standards, reputation, and trade: evidence from US
horticultural import refusals. World Trade Review 11:3, 438-461. [Crossref]
885. Giulia Bettin, Alessia Lo Turco. 2012. A Cross-Country View on South-North Migration and Trade:
Dissecting the Channels. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 48:4, 4-29. [Crossref]
886. Joachim Wagner. 2012. International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since
2006. Review of World Economics 148:2, 235-267. [Crossref]
887. Vincenzo Verardi, Joachim Wagner. 2012. Productivity Premia for German Manufacturing Firms
Exporting to the Euro-Area and Beyond: First Evidence from Robust Fixed Effects Estimations. The
888. Gregory Corcos, Massimo Del Gatto, Giordano Mion, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano. 2012. Productivity
and Firm Selection: Quantifying the ‘New’ Gains from Trade. The Economic Journal 122:561,
754-798. [Crossref]
889. Sebastian Krautheim. 2012. Heterogeneous firms, exporter networks and the effect of distance on
international trade. Journal of International Economics 87:1, 27-35. [Crossref]
890. Matilde Bombardini, Christopher J. Kurz, Peter M. Morrow. 2012. Ricardian trade and the impact
of domestic competition on export performance. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne
891. Philipp J.H. Schröder, Allan Sørensen. 2012. Firm exit, technological progress and trade. European
892. E. Chevassus-Lozza, K. Latouche. 2012. Firms, markets and trade costs: access of French exporters
to European agri-food markets. European Review of Agricultural Economics 39:2, 257-288. [Crossref]
893. Hyo-young Lee, Chong-Sup Kim. 2012. The Impact of Trade Facilitation on the Extensive and
Intensive Margins of Trade: An Application for Developing Countries. East Asian Economic Review
16:1, 67-96. [Crossref]
894. Alexander Tarasov. 2012. Per capita income, market access costs, and trade volumes. Journal of
895. Daniel X. Nguyen. 2012. Demand uncertainty: Exporting delays and exporting failures. Journal of
896. Ines Buono, Guy Lalanne. 2012. The effect of the Uruguay round on the intensive and extensive
margins of trade. Journal of International Economics 86:2, 269-283. [Crossref]
897. Costas Arkolakis,, Arnaud Costinot,, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2012. New Trade Models, Same Old
Gains?. American Economic Review 102:1, 94-130. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
898. Paul De Grauwe, Romain Houssa, Giulia Piccillo. 2012. African trade dynamics: is China a different
trading partner?. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 10:1, 15-45. [Crossref]
899. K. Manova, Z. Zhang. 2012. Export Prices Across Firms and Destinations. The Quarterly Journal of
900. N. Berman, P. Martin, T. Mayer. 2012. How do Different Exporters React to Exchange Rate
Changes?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127:1, 437-492. [Crossref]
901. Eric Sheppard. 2012. Trade, globalization and uneven development. Progress in Human Geography
36:1, 44-71. [Crossref]
902. Sébastien Miroudot, Jehan Sauvage, Ben Shepherd. 2012. Trade costs and productivity in services
sectors. Economics Letters 114:1, 36-38. [Crossref]
903. Emanuele Bacchiega, Antonio Minniti, Arsen Palestini. 2012. Quality, Distance and Trade: A
Strategic Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 3. . [Crossref]
904. Xuebing Yang. 2012. An Eaton-Kortum Openness Index. SSRN Electronic Journal 3. . [Crossref]
905. Kai Xu. 2012. Gains from Trade and the Food Problem. SSRN Electronic Journal 54. . [Crossref]
906. Alberto Felettigh. 2012. Entry Dynamics as a Solution to the Puzzling Behaviour of Real Marginal
Costs in the Ghironi-Melitz Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
907. Cletus C. Coughlin. 2012. Extensive and Intensive Trade Margins: A State-by-State View. SSRN
908. Lota D. Tamini, Maurice Doyon, Rodrigue Simon. 2012. Analyzing Trade Liberalization Effect in
the Egg Sector Using a Dynamic Gravity Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 56. . [Crossref]
909. Douglas Brooks, Benno Ferrarini. 2012. Vertical Gravity. SSRN Electronic Journal 98. . [Crossref]
910. Antoine Gervais. 2012. Product Quality, Firm Heterogeneity and Trade Liberalization. SSRN
911. Till Gross, Stephane Verani. 2012. Financing Constraints, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade.
912. Ana Fernandes, Heiwai Tang. 2012. Learning from Neighbors’ Export Activities: Evidence from
Exporters’ Survival. SSRN Electronic Journal 43. . [Crossref]
913. Angelo Secchi, Federico Tamagni, Chiara Tomasi. 2012. Exporting Under Financial Constraints:
Margins, Switching Dynamics and Prices. SSRN Electronic Journal 10. . [Crossref]
914. Shon M. Ferguson. 2012. Cross-Industry Heterogeneity in Export Participation: The Role of Scale
Economies in R&D. SSRN Electronic Journal 30. . [Crossref]
915. Angela Abbate, Luca De Benedictis, Giorgio Fagiolo, Lucia Tajoli. 2012. The International Trade
Network in Space and Time. SSRN Electronic Journal 13. . [Crossref]
916. Soojae Moon. 2012. How Trade Restrictions Disperse: Policy Dynamics with Firm Selection. SSRN
917. Ha Manh Nguyen. 2012. The Home Market Effects with Heterogeneous Firms. SSRN Electronic
918. Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2012. The Empirics of
Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
919. Chang-Tai Hsieh, Peter J. Klenow. 2012. The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico. SSRN
920. Chankwon Bae, Jeong-Gon Kim, Hye Yoon Keum, Yong Joon Jang. 2012. FTAA (The Impact of Free
Trade Agreements on Economic Performance in Korea). SSRN Electronic Journal 927. . [Crossref]
921. Hyo-young Lee, Chong-Sup Kim. 2012. The Impact of Trade Facilitation on the Extensive and
Intensive Margins of Trade: An Application for Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal 94. .
[Crossref]
922. Heiwai Tang, Yifan Zhang. 2012. Quality Differentiation and Trade Intermediation. SSRN Electronic
923. Henk LM Kox. 2012. Export Decisions of Services Firms between Agglomeration Effects and Market-
Entry Costs. SSRN Electronic Journal 6. . [Crossref]
924. Julian di Giovanni, Jing Zhang, Andrei A. Levchenko. 2012. The Global Welfare Impact of China:
Trade Integration and Technological Change. IMF Working Papers 12:79, 1. [Crossref]
925. Wei Liao, Ana Maria Santacreu. 2012. The Trade Comovement Puzzle and the Margins of
International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 111. . [Crossref]
926. Harold Creusen, Henk Kox, Arjan Lejour, Roger Smeets. 2011. Exploring the Margins of Dutch
Exports: A Firm-Level Analysis. De Economist 159:4, 413-434. [Crossref]
927. Massimo Del Gatto, Adriana Di Liberto, Carmelo Petraglia. 2011. MEASURING
PRODUCTIVITY. Journal of Economic Surveys 25:5, 952-1008. [Crossref]
928. SEMIH TUMEN. 2011. MEASURING EARNINGS INEQUALITY: AN ECONOMIC
ANALYSIS OF THE BONFERRONI INDEX. Review of Income and Wealth 57:4, 727-744.
[Crossref]
929. Natalie Chen, Dennis Novy. 2011. Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries.
930. Maria Bejan. 2011. Trade agreements and international comovements: The case of NAFTA (North
American Free Trade Agreement). Review of Economic Dynamics 14:4, 667-685. [Crossref]
931. Carlos Llano-Verduras, Asier Minondo, Francisco Requena-Silvente. 2011. Is the Border Effect an
Artefact of Geographical Aggregation?. The World Economy 34:10, 1771-1787. [Crossref]
932. Matthew T. Cole. 2011. Not all trade restrictions are created equally. Review of World Economics
147:3, 411-427. [Crossref]
933. Julian di Giovanni, Andrei A. Levchenko, Romain Rancière. 2011. Power laws in firm size and
openness to trade: Measurement and implications. Journal of International Economics 85:1, 42-52.
[Crossref]
934. James E. Anderson. 2011. The Gravity Model. Annual Review of Economics 3:1, 133-160. [Crossref]
935. Stephen J. Redding. 2011. Theories of Heterogeneous Firms and Trade. Annual Review of Economics
3:1, 77-105. [Crossref]
936. Francesco Pappadà. 2011. Real Adjustment of Current Account Imbalances with Firm Heterogeneity.
IMF Economic Review 59:3, 431-454. [Crossref]
937. A. B. Bernard, S. J. Redding, P. K. Schott. 2011. Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization. The
938. Luca De Benedictis, Lucia Tajoli. 2011. The World Trade Network. The World Economy 34:8,
1417-1454. [Crossref]
939. Holger Breinlich, Alessandra Tucci. 2011. Foreign market conditions and export performance: does
‘crowdedness’ reduce exports?. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 44:3,
991-1019. [Crossref]
940. Mario Larch, Wolfgang Lechthaler. 2011. Why ‘Buy American’ is a bad idea but politicians still like
it. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 44:3, 838-858. [Crossref]
941. José Antonio Rodríguez-López. 2011. Prices and Exchange Rates: A Theory of Disconnect. The
Review of Economic Studies 78:3, 1135-1177. [Crossref]
942. Matthieu Crozet, Isabelle Méjean, Soledad Zignago. 2011. Plus grandes, plus fortes, plus loin... Revue
économique Vol. 62:4, 717-736. [Crossref]
943. Richard Kneller, Mauro Pisu. 2011. Barriers to Exporting: What are They and Who do They Matter
to?. The World Economy 34:6, 893-930. [Crossref]
944. Joakim Gullstrand. 2011. Firm and destination-specific export costs: The case of the Swedish food
sector. Food Policy 36:2, 204-213. [Crossref]
945. Yushi Yoshida. 2011. An Empirical Examination of Export Variety: Regional Heterogeneity within a
Nation. The World Economy 34:4, 602-622. [Crossref]
946. Gabriel Felbermayr, Julien Prat. 2011. PRODUCT MARKET REGULATION, FIRM
SELECTION, AND UNEMPLOYMENT. Journal of the European Economic Association 9:2,
278-317. [Crossref]
947. Gábor Békés, Balázs Muraközy, Péter Harasztosi. 2011. Firms and products in international trade:
Evidence from Hungary. Economic Systems 35:1, 4-24. [Crossref]
948. David S. Jacks, Christopher M. Meissner, Dennis Novy. 2011. Trade booms, trade busts, and trade
costs. Journal of International Economics 83:2, 185-201. [Crossref]
949. Ferdinando Monte. 2011. Skill bias, trade, and wage dispersion. Journal of International Economics
83:2, 202-218. [Crossref]
950. Edward J. Balistreri, Russell H. Hillberry, Thomas F. Rutherford. 2011. Structural estimation and
solution of international trade models with heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics
83:2, 95-108. [Crossref]
951. K. Head, T. Mayer. 2011. Gravity, market potential and economic development. Journal of Economic
Geography 11:2, 281-294. [Crossref]
952. Rod Falvey, David Greenaway, Zhihong Yu. 2011. Catching Up or Pulling Away: Intra-Industry Trade,
Productivity Gaps and Heterogeneous Firms. Open Economies Review 22:1, 17-38. [Crossref]
953. Gonzague Vannoorenberghe. 2011. Trade between symmetric countries, heterogeneous firms, and
the skill premium. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 44:1, 148-170.
[Crossref]
954. Luca De Benedictis, Daria Taglioni. The Gravity Model in International Trade 55-89. [Crossref]
955. Mark J. Gibson, Tim A. Graciano. 2011. The Decision to Import. American Journal of Agricultural
956. Allen Dennis, Ben Shepherd. 2011. Trade Facilitation and Export Diversification. The World Economy
34:1, 101-122. [Crossref]
957. Cletus C. Coughlin, Dennis Novy. 2011. Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic
Border Effect? Evidence from U.S. Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
958. Dan Ciuriak. 2011. Policy Implications of Heterogeneous Firms Trade Theory. SSRN Electronic
959. Pushan Dutt, Ilian Mihov, Timothy Van Zandt. 2011. Does WTO Matter for the Extensive and the
Intensive Margins of Trade?. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
960. Pushan Dutt, Ilian Mihov, Timothy Van Zandt. 2011. Does WTO Matter for the Extensive and the
Intensive Margins of Trade?. SSRN Electronic Journal 105. . [Crossref]
961. Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman. 2011. Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises. SSRN
962. Fabien Candau, Elisa Dienesch. 2011. A Survey on the Micro-Foundations of the Trade Gravity
Equation. SSRN Electronic Journal 790. . [Crossref]
963. Emma Batchford, Danny McGowan, Chris Milner. 2011. Trade Costs and Trade Composition. SSRN
964. Lorenzo Caliendo, Fernando Parro. 2011. Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA.
965. Gita Gopinath, Brent Neiman. 2011. Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises. SSRN
966. Danny McGowan, Chris Milner. 2011. Trade Costs and Trade Composition. SSRN Electronic Journal
38. . [Crossref]
967. Wei Liao, Ana Maria Santacreu. 2011. The Trade Comovement Puzzle and the Margins of
International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 111. . [Crossref]
968. Chang-Tai Hsieh, Peter J. Klenow. 2011. The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico. SSRN
969. Gregory Corcos, Massimo Del Gatto, Giordiano Mion, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano. 2011. Productivity
and Firm Selection: Quantifying the 'New' Gains from Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 119. .
[Crossref]
970. Bo Xiong, John C. Beghin. 2011. Disentangling the Demand-Enhancing Effect and Trade-Cost
Effect of Technical Measures in Agricultural Trade Among OECD Countries. SSRN Electronic
971. Antoine Gervais. 2011. Product Quality and Firm Heterogeneity in International Trade. SSRN
972. Achim Daniel Schmillen. 2011. The Exporter Wage Premium Reconsidered: Destinations, Distances
and Linked Employer-Employee Data. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
973. Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch, Alejandro Riano. 2011. Maquiladoras and Informality: A Mixed
Blessing. SSRN Electronic Journal 119. . [Crossref]
974. Maria Persson. 2011. From Trade Preferences to Trade Facilitation: Taking Stock of the Issues. SSRN
975. Yves Bourdet, Maria Persson. 2011. Reaping the Benefits of Deeper Euro-Med Integration Through
Trade Facilitation. SSRN Electronic Journal 4473. . [Crossref]
976. Rodrigo Andres Wagner. 2011. The Collective Action of Global Entrepreneurs. SSRN Electronic
977. Ferdinando Monte. 2011. Skill Bias, Trade, and Wage Dispersion. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. .
[Crossref]
978. Yong Joon Jang. 2011. Trade Liberalization, Intra-Industry Reallocation of Labor and Trade
Adjustment Assistance. SSRN Electronic Journal 3. . [Crossref]
979. Young Gui Kim, Jungu Kang, Hyuk-Hwang Kim, Hea-Jung Hyun. 2011. (A Study on the
Determinants and Productivity Spillover Effects of Korea's Intermediate Goods Trade). SSRN
980. Nakgyoon Choi. 2011. (Economic Costs of Protectionism and Its Policy Implications). SSRN
981. Luca Antonio Ricci, Federico Trionfetti. 2011. Evidenceon Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and
Networks in the Export Performance of Firms. IMF Working Papers 11:77, 1. [Crossref]
982. Heiwai Tang, Yifan Zhang. 2011. Exchange Rates and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Chinese
Exporters. SSRN Electronic Journal 122. . [Crossref]
983. George Alessandria,, Joseph P. Kaboski,, Virgiliu Midrigan. 2010. Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and
Large Devaluations. American Economic Review 100:5, 2304-2339. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
984. L. D. Tamini, J.-P. Gervais, B. Larue. 2010. Trade liberalisation effects on agricultural goods at
different processing stages. European Review of Agricultural Economics 37:4, 453-477. [Crossref]
985. Kichun KANG, Jong-Ho KIM. 2010. EXPLORING THE SPECTRUM OF EXPORT
DESTINATION: THE GEOGRAPHIC SPREAD OF KOREAN EXPORTS, ITS
DETERMINANTS, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS. The Developing Economies 48:4, 421-449.
[Crossref]
986. Philipp J. H. Schröder, Allan Sørensen. 2010. Ad valorem versus unit taxes: monopolistic competition,
heterogeneous firms, and intra-industry reallocations. Journal of Economics 101:3, 247-265. [Crossref]
987. Nicolas Berman, Jérôme Héricourt. 2010. Financial factors and the margins of trade: Evidence from
cross-country firm-level data. Journal of Development Economics 93:2, 206-217. [Crossref]
988. Octavio R. Escobar Gamboa. 2010. The (un)lucky neighbour: Differences in export performance
across Mexico's states. Papers in Regional Science 89:4, 777-799. [Crossref]
989. Giovanni Peri, Francisco Requena‐Silvente. 2010. The trade creation effect of immigrants: evidence
from the remarkable case of Spain. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
43:4, 1433-1459. [Crossref]
990. Martina Lawless. 2010. Deconstructing gravity: trade costs and extensive and intensive margins.
991. Fan Zhai. Chapter 2 Trade Liberalization and the Extensive Margin of Trade in a CGE Model with
Heterogeneous Firms 27-40. [Crossref]
992. Henk L. M. Kox, Hugo Rojas-Romagosa. 2010. Exports and Productivity Selection Effects for Dutch
Firms. De Economist 158:3, 295-322. [Crossref]
993. Ben shepherd. 2010. Geographical Diversification of Developing Country Exports. World Development
38:9, 1217-1228. [Crossref]
994. R. S. Grossman, C. M. Meissner. 2010. International aspects of the Great Depression and the crisis of
2007: similarities, differences, and lessons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26:3, 318-338. [Crossref]
995. D’Artis Kancs. 2010. Structural Estimation of Variety Gains from Trade Integration in Asia. Australian
996. Kichun Kang, Byung Chul Ahn. 2010. China's Penetration of the Korean Market: Stylized Facts and
Welfare Effect. China & World Economy 18:5, 54-71. [Crossref]
997. Itai Agur. 2010. Trade Liberalization, Firm Selection, and Variety Growth. Review of International
998. Pamina Koenig, Florian Mayneris, Sandra Poncet. 2010. Local export spillovers in France. European
999. Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, John Ries. 2010. The erosion of colonial trade linkages after
independence. Journal of International Economics 81:1, 1-14. [Crossref]
1000. Richard Frensch. 2010. Trade Liberalization and Import Margins. Emerging Markets Finance and
Trade 46:3, 4-22. [Crossref]
1001. Andreas Moxnes. 2010. Are sunk costs in exporting country specific?. Canadian Journal of Economics/
Revue canadienne d'économique 43:2, 467-493. [Crossref]
1002. Kei-Mu Yi. 2010. Can Multistage Production Explain the Home Bias in Trade?. American Economic
Review 100:1, 364-393. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
1003. Davide Castellani, Francesco Serti, Chiara Tomasi. 2010. Firms in International Trade: Importers’
and Exporters’ Heterogeneity in Italian Manufacturing Industry. World Economy 33:3, 424-457.
[Crossref]
1004. Massimo Riccaboni, Stefano Schiavo. 2010. Structure and growth of weighted networks. New Journal
of Physics 12:2, 023003. [Crossref]
1005. Matthieu Crozet, Pamina Koenig. 2010. Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive
margins. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 43:1, 41-62. [Crossref]
1006. Robert C. Feenstra. 2010. Measuring the gains from trade under monopolistic competition. Canadian
1007. Anne-Célia Disdier, Silvio H. T. Tai, Lionel Fontagné, Thierry Mayer. 2010. Bilateral trade of cultural
goods. Review of World Economics 145:4, 575-595. [Crossref]
1008. Paulo Bastos, Joana Silva. 2010. Identifying vertically differentiated products. Economics Letters 106:1,
32-34. [Crossref]
1009. Giulia Bettin, Alessia Lo Turco. 2010. A Cross Country View On South-North Migration And Trade:
Dissecting the Channels. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
1010. Isao Kamata. 2010. Comparative Advantage, Firm Heterogeneity, and Selection of Exporters. SSRN
1011. Massimo Riccaboni, Stefano Schiavo. 2010. The Structure and Growth of International Trade. SSRN
1012. J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott, Andrew B. Bernard. 2010. The Margins of
US Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
1013. Daniel Nguyen. 2010. Demand Uncertainty: Exporting Delays and Exporting Failures. SSRN
1014. Philipp J. H. Schröder, Allan Sorensen. 2010. Ad Valorem versus Unit Taxes: Monopolistic
Competition, Heterogeneous Firms, and Intra-Industry Reallocations. SSRN Electronic Journal 81. .
[Crossref]
1015. Isao Kamata. 2010. Explaining Export Varieties: The Role of Comparative Advantage. SSRN
1016. Arthur Grimes. 2010. The Economics of Infrastructure Investment: Beyond Simple Cost Benefit
Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
1017. Reto Foellmi, Christian Hepenstrick, Josef Zweimüller. 2010. Non-Homothetic Preferences, Parallel
Imports and the Extensive Margin of International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 100. . [Crossref]
1018. Ines Buono, Guy Lalanne. 2010. The Effect of the Uruguay Round on the Intensive and Extensive
Margins of Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
1019. Filip Abraham, Jan Van Hove. 2010. Can Belgian Firms Cope with the Chinese Dragon and the Asian
Tigers? The Export Performance of Multi-Product Firms on Foreign Markets. SSRN Electronic
1020. Richard Frensch. 2010. European Trade in Parts and Components: Searching (for a Trade Model for
Searching) for Offshoring Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal 49. . [Crossref]
1021. Nicola Lacetera, Justin R. Sydnor. 2010. Is high-Quality Production Location-Specific? Evidence
from the Automobile Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
1022. Matthieu Crozet, Isabelle Mejean, Soledad Zignago. 2010. Plus grandes, plus fortes, plus loin... Les
performances des firmes exportatrices françaises (Bigger, Stronger, Farther... Relative Performances
of French Exporting Firms). SSRN Electronic Journal 36. . [Crossref]
1023. Christian Knebel. 2010. Measuring the Price Effects of Import Restrictions: Theory and Evidence.
1024. Henk LM Kox, Hugo Rojas-Romagosa. 2010. Exports and Productivity Selection Effects for Dutch
Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 47. . [Crossref]
1025. Andrei A. Levchenko, Julian di Giovanni, Romain Ranciere. 2010. Power Laws in Firm Size and
Openness to Trade: Measurement and Implications. IMF Working Papers 10:109, 1. [Crossref]
1026. Dudley Cooke. 2010. Monetary Policy and Trade Globalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 122. .
[Crossref]
1027. M.-L. Rau, F. van Tongeren. 2009. Heterogeneous firms and homogenising standards in agri-food
trade: the Polish meat case. European Review of Agricultural Economics 36:4, 479-505. [Crossref]
1028. Pascal L. Ghazalian, Bruno Larue, Jean-Philippe Gervais. 2009. Exporting to new destinations and
the effects of tariffs: the case of meat commodities. Agricultural Economics 40:6, 701-714. [Crossref]
1029. Raphael Auer. 2009. Taste Heterogeneity, Trade, and the Within-Industry Home Market Effect.
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 145:4, 387-403. [Crossref]
1030. Betina Dimaranan, Elena Ianchovichina, Will Martin. 2009. How will growth in China and India
affect the world economy?. Review of World Economics 145:3, 551-571. [Crossref]
1031. Ben Shepherd, John S. Wilson. 2009. Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries: Measuring
progress and assessing priorities. Journal of Asian Economics 20:4, 367-383. [Crossref]
1032. Xavier Gabaix. 2009. Power Laws in Economics and Finance. Annual Review of Economics 1:1, 255-294.
[Crossref]
1033. Silvio H. T. Tai. 2009. Market structure and the link between migration and trade. Review of World
1034. Quy-Toan Do, Andrei A. Levchenko. 2009. Trade, inequality, and the political economy of
institutions. Journal of Economic Theory 144:4, 1489-1520. [Crossref]
1035. Luciana Echazu. 2009. Product differentiation, firm heterogeneity and international trade: Exploring
the Alchian–Allen effect. Research in Economics 63:2, 95-101. [Crossref]
1036. Martina Lawless. 2009. Firm export dynamics and the geography of trade. Journal of International
1037. Richard Frensch. 2009. Trade Liberalisation and Import Margins. SSRN Electronic Journal 97. .
[Crossref]
1038. Juan Carlos Carlos Hallak, Jagadeesh Sivadasan. 2009. Firms' Exporting Behavior under Quality
Constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
1039. Roc Armenter, Miklós Koren. 2009. Economies of Scale and the Size of Exporters. SSRN Electronic
1040. Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2009. The Margins of
U.S. Trade (Long Version). SSRN Electronic Journal 118. . [Crossref]
1041. Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso, Gordon Wilmsmeier. 2009. Freight Rates and the Margins of Intra-
Latin American Maritime Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
1042. Andrew B. Bernard, Stephen J. Redding, Peter K. Schott. 2009. Multi-Product Firms and Trade
Liberalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
1043. Cletus C. Coughlin, Dennis Novy. 2009. Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic
Border Effect? Evidence from U.S. Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
1044. Ines Buono. 2009. Firm Heterogeneity and Comparative Advantage: The Response of French Firms
to Turkey's Entry in the European Customs Union. SSRN Electronic Journal 47. . [Crossref]
1045. Stephan Rudolph. 2009. The Gravity Equation with Micro-Founded Trade Costs. SSRN Electronic
1046. Andrea Finicelli, Patrizio Pagano, Massimo Sbracia. 2009. Ricardian Selection. SSRN Electronic
1047. International Monetary Fund. 2009. Elasticity Optimism. IMF Working Papers 09:279, 1. [Crossref]
1048. Andrew Atkeson,, Ariel Burstein. 2008. Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative
Prices. American Economic Review 98:5, 1998-2031. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
1049. George A. Alessandria, Joseph P. Kaboski, Virgiliu Midrigan. 2008. Inventories, Lumpy Trade, and
Devaluations. SSRN Electronic Journal 115. . [Crossref]
1050. Ruben Segura-Cayuela, Josep M. Vilarrubia. 2008. Uncertainty and Entry into Export Markets. SSRN
1051. Kei-Mu Yi. 2008. Can Multi-Stage Production Explain the Home Bias in Trade?. SSRN Electronic
1052. Edward J. Balistreri, Russell H. Hillberry, Thomas F. Rutherford. 2008. Structural Estimation and
Solution of International Trade Models with Heterogeneous Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. .
[Crossref]
1053. Xavier Gabaix. 2008. Power Laws in Economics and Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
1054. Kristian Behrens, Giordano Mion, Yasusada Murata, Jens Suedekum. 2008. Trade, Wages, and
Productivity. SSRN Electronic Journal 93. . [Crossref]
1055. Jean M. Imbs, Isabelle Mejean. 2008. Elasticity Optimism. SSRN Electronic Journal 84. . [Crossref]
1056. Paulo Bastos, Joana Silva. 2008. Cultural Links, Firm Heterogeneity and the Intensive and Extensive
Margins of International Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal 138. . [Crossref]
1057. Massimo Del Gatto, Adriana Di Liberto, Carmelo Petraglia. 2008. Measuring Productivity. SSRN
1058. Anne-Celia Disdier, Silvio H. T. Tai, Lionel Fontagne, Thierry Mayer. 2007. Bilateral Trade of
Cultural Goods. SSRN Electronic Journal 96. . [Crossref]

Aer 98 4 1707

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aer 98 4 1707

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

American Economic Review 2008, 98:4, 1707–1721

Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins

(3) P 1w̃h , w 2 5 Gh 1w 2 5 1 2 w2gh,

Demand for Differentiated Goods.—The total income spent by workers in country j, Yj , is

h51 k, l51 wkl

II. Trade with Heterogeneous Firms

(8) Pj 5 l2 3 Yj1/g21/ 1s212 3 uj,

Equilibrium Exports, Thresholds, and Profits.—Exports by an individual firm depend on its

from other countries: Xik / Xk 5 3 1Li / L2 kik / gj 1Lj / L2 kjk 4 .

III. Intensive versus Extensive Margins of Trade

lowing expressions for each margin: 18

X hij 5 wi Li 3 x hij 1w 2 dGh 1w 2.

with lh 5 11 1 l52 3 mh. Noting that Yi 5 11 1 l52 wiLi, we get

312gHh51 1 1sh 2 12 / gh 2 1mh /sh 2 4 6.

Integrating over all exporters, we get

with respect to variable costs 5 2 awiLi 3

We therefore get the simple solution for the elasticity:

Elasticity of the extensive margin tij 'w

tij w i L i x 1 wij 2 Gr 1 wij 2 3 wij

You might also like