Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biffi 2004
Biffi 2004
To cite this article: R. Biffi , M. Munari , L. Dioguardi , C. Ballabio , A. Cattaneo , C. L. Galli & P. Restani (2004) Ochratoxin A
in conventional and organic cereal derivatives: a survey of the Italian market, 2001–02, Food Additives & Contaminants, 21:6,
586-591, DOI: 10.1080/02652030410001687708
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and
should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for
any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of
the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Food Additives and Contaminants, Vol. 21, No. 6 (June 2004), pp. 586–591
JECFA retained the previous established provisional blended. Each batch and each sample was analysed
tolerable weekly intake of 0.1 mg kg1 body weight at least twice.
(bw), recommending a further review of the myco-
toxin in 2004, and it concluded that given the distri-
bution of ochratoxin contamination in cereals,
imposing a limit of 5 or 20 mg kg1 would make no
significant difference to the average consumer’s intake Chemicals
(JECFA 1996, 2001).
The Italian Ministry of Health (1999) adopted the Ochratoxin A from A. ochraceus (benzene free) was
European Union limit of 3 mg kg1 ochratoxin A for from Sigma Aldrich (Milan, Italy); a stock concen-
cereal derivatives and established a further Italian trated solution was prepared in toluene–acetic acid
limit of 0.5 mg kg1 for baby foods. (99:1 v/v) at a final concentration of 1 mg ml1 and
stored at 20 C.
In view of the JECFA’s advice that ochratoxin A
intake should be monitored in different countries, the The ochratoxin A working solution was prepared by
diluting the stock solution with the same solvent to
Downloaded by [University of California, San Francisco] at 23:06 22 February 2015
6 ml min1 and all remaining liquid was removed All samples of commercial cereal derivatives were
from the column at the end of elution. Ochratoxin A below the legal limit, while four samples of baby food
was collected by eluting with 1.5 ml methanol–acetic (two semolinas from conventional agriculture and
acid (98:2 v/v). The eluates were dried under nitrogen two rice creams from organic agriculture) were above
and suspended in 300 ml water–methanol–acetic acid the Italian limit of 0.5 mg kg1. There was no signifi-
(50:49:1). A 100-ml portion was subjected to HPLC. cant difference between similar samples from conven-
To estimate the percentage recovery, flours samples tional and organic agriculture in commercial flours
(10 g) were spiked with 3 ng ochratoxin A (30 ml of a and derivatives, while some differences were observed
standard solution containing 0.1 mg ml1) and stored in baby foods. Semolina from conventional agricul-
overnight at 4 C. A spiked sample was prepared for ture had a higher content of mycotoxin than the
every group of six analyses. corresponding products from organic agriculture
and integrated pest management agriculture
( p < 0.01 and <0.005, respectively). By contrast, rice
formulas from organic agriculture were the more
Statistical analysis contaminated ( p < 0.01 versus conventional agricul-
ture, and p ¼ 0.02 versus integrated pest management
The significance of the difference between the means agriculture). All baby foods from integrated pest
was calculated by analysis of variance and then by a management agriculture contained ochratoxin A
Student’s t-test. below the limit of detection (0.025 mg kg1).
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of a sample of hard whole wheat flour after extraction of ochratoxin A and purification
through an immunoaffinity chromatography column. The sample illustrated contains 0.309 g kg1 ochratoxin A.
Ochratoxin A in conventional and organic cereal derivatives 589
Table 1. Ochratoxin A content (g kg1) in cereal flours and derivatives found in the Italian market, 200102.
Samples above
Agricultural Number of Mean* Median Range legal limits
Cereal Product practices batches (mg kg1) SD (mg kg1) (mg kg1) (n)
To evaluate the role of storage in the development 0.057 0.021 mg kg1 (mean SE) in newly milled
of fungi producing ochratoxin A, several samples flour to 0.223 0.052 and 0.246 0.12 for conven-
of wheat and hard wheat flours were analysed tional and organic commercial flours, respectively.
immediately after milling. The content of mycotoxin
immediately after milling was compared with that
in commercial products (figure 2). The values in Discussion and conclusions
wheat flours measured at the mill and at retailers
were similar: 0.074 0.025 mg kg1 (mean SE) in
flour from the mill versus 0.134 0.039 and The presence of ochratoxin A is usually associated
0.053 0.21 for conventional and organic commercial with cereals and derivatives, although recent data
flours, respectively. A different ochratoxin A content have shown that other sources can contribute signifi-
was found for flour from hard wheat: from cantly to the total intake of the mycotoxin. In recent
590 R. Biffi et al.
0
mill CV OR mill CV OR
Estimated daily intake of ochratoxin A from
consumption of commercial cereal derivatives
wheat flour hard wheat flour
thank Professor Peter Woodford for editorial Italian Ministry of Health, 1999, Direttive in materia di controllo
ufficiale sui prodotti alimentari: valori massimi ammissibili di
assistance. micotossine nelle derrate alimentari di origine nazionale, comu-
nitaria e Paesi terzi [Maximal acceptable mycotoxin concentra-
tions in foods from national and international market]. Circular
No. 10, 9 June 1999. Gazzetta Ufficiale, no. 135 June 11th, 1999.
References JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives),
1996, Ochratoxin A. Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food
Additives and Contaminants in Food, WHO Food Additives,
Series 35, pp. 363–376 WHO, Geneve.
AOAC, 1995, Ochratoxin A. Official Methods of Analysis, Natural JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives),
Toxins (Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical 2001, Ochratoxin A. Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food
Chemists), p. 38. Additives and Contaminants in Food, Fifty-sixth Meeting,
Beretta, B., De Domenico, R., Gaiaschi, A., Ballabio, C., Geneva 6–15 February 2001 (available at http://www.who.int/
Galli, C. L., Gigliotti, C., and Restani, P., 2002. pcs/jecfa/Summary56.pdf) WHO, Geneve.
Ochratoxin A in cereal-based baby-foods: occurrence and Jrgensen, K., 1998, Survey of pork, poultry, coffee, beer and pulses
safety evaluation. Food Additives and Contaminants, 19, 70–75. for ochratoxin A. Food Additives and Contaminants, 15,
Chelkowski, J., Samson, R. A., Wiewiorowska, M., and
550–554.
Golinski, P., 1987, Ochratoxin A formation by isolated strains
Jrgensen, K., Rasmussen, G., and Thorup, I., 1996, Ochratoxin A
Downloaded by [University of California, San Francisco] at 23:06 22 February 2015